DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix E: California Tribes and Tribal Communities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix E: California Tribes and Tribal Communities Appendix E: California Tribes and Tribal Communities This appendix provides information submitted by California Tribes and Tribal Communities in the MLPA North Coast Study Region. California Tribes and Tribal Communities were invited to submit information to be included, verbatim, in a special appendix to the regional profile as supplemental to the information provided in sections 5.2 (Native American Tribes and Tribal People) and 7.1 (Federal, Tribal, State, and Local Jurisdiction and Programs) of this regional profile. The information included in this appendix has been included as it was submitted to the MLPA Initiative and has not been edited by MLPA Initiative staff. The pages that follow are exactly as they were submitted, except that page numbers have been added which continue the page numbering of this regional profile. Information in the appendix is organized alphabetically, as follows: Page 187 Bear River Band of Rohnerville Rancheria, submitted by Nick Angeloff, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, Bear River Band of Rohnerville Rancheria 197 Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria, submitted by Jacque Hostler, CEO/Transportation Land Use Director, Trinidad Rancheria 223 Elk Valley Rancheria, submitted by Reweti Wiki, Chief Governmental Officer, Elk Valley Rancheria 225 InterTribal Sinkyone Profile, submitted by Hawk Rosales, Executive Director, InterTribal Sinkyone Wilderness Council 269 Noyo River Indian Community, submitted by Valerie Stanley, Representative, Noyo River Indian Community 273 Potter Valley Tribe, submitted by Gregg Young, Environmental Manager, Potter Valley Tribe 275 Robinson Rancheria, submitted by Meyo Marrufo, Environmental Coordinator, Robinson Rancheria 277 Tolowa Dee-ni’ Tribe of the Smith River Rancheria, submitted by Russ Crabtree, Tribal Administrator, Smith River Rancheria 279 Tolowa Nation, submitted by Raja Storr, Tolowa Nation member 291 Wiyot Tribe, submitted by Stephen Kullmann, Environmental Director, Wiyot Tribe 293 Yurok Tribe, submitted by Megan Rocha, Acting Self-Governance Officer, Yurok Tribe Please note: The content included in this appendix was not created by MLPA Initiative staff nor does it reflect the views or opinions of the California Department of Fish and Game, California Department of Parks and Recreation, or the MLPA Initiative. 185 186 April 12, 2010 California Marine Life Protection Act Initiative C/O California Natural Resources Agency 1416 Ninth Street, Suite 1311 Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: Bear River Regional Profile The Bear River Band of Rohnerville Rancheria regional profile includes sections on the history of the tribe as it relates to federal recognition, an overview of the historic coastal land use and an overview of contemporary life among the tribe. This profile is intended to bring a broad understanding to the reader and is not comprehensive in any manner. Identifying specific information with regard to the location of prehistoric (or contemporary) use areas is not appropriate in a document of this sort. There are tables of archaeological species documented as being utilized in the past; this list is neither complete nor comprehensive as archaeological data is jaded as a function of preservation, if faunal remains do not preserve then they are not captured in archaeological recovery projects. The Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria is located on a rural parcel of Federal Trust land located two miles east of Loleta, CA. It overlooks the mouth of the Eel River and the Pacific Ocean; this land lies within the ancestral territory of the tribes served by the Bear River Rancheria. Tribal lands now amount to 191 acres, of which 62 are trust lands. The Tribe currently has 400 members. The Rohnerville Rancheria was established in 1910 as a refuge for dispossessed Indian people. It drew in members from various tribes in the area. The Rancheria was terminated following the California Rancheria Act of 1958, and was reinstated after the Tillie Hardwick vs. United States case of 1983. The Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria is federally recognized as having members from the Bear River/Mattole tribes and the Wiyot tribes. Its members have direct ancestral links to each of the local tribes, and principally to the Wiyot, Bear River, Mattole, Lassik, Nongatl, Sinkyone and Whilkut. The members of Bear River are active in hunting and gathering, ceremony, traditional manufacturing and many other aspects of continued use of traditional resources. 187 Since the Rancheria’s inception a century ago, Bear River has established itself as one of the most progressivetribesinthearea.Ithasatribalgovernmentcomposedatribalcouncilandanelectedchair and a constitution. It has established numerous other administrative offices: a Historic Preservation Office, an Environmental Department, and Administration on Aging Department, a Child Care 188 Department,aLibrary,andaTribalSocialServicesDepartment.Fiveyearsago,theTribeopenedacasino and in 2009 it opened a gas station. In short, the Tribe has demonstrated great resourcefulness in developingselffundedandstateandfederalfundedprojects. HistoricCoastalLandUse The Bear River Band of Rohnerville Rancheria has been active participants, proponents of and has conductedarchaeologicalresearchforovertwodecades.Thetribebelievesthatarchaeologicalresearch isanaspectoftheirhistoryisalegitimateresourcethatshouldbefullyunderstoodinordertoprovidea holisticunderstandingoftheirpast.Apartofthisresearchincludesethnographicresearchasatoolto documentthewordsoftheirancestors.Bothofthesetools,archaeologyandethnographyhavebeen utilizedtothebenefitofthetribeandsomeoftheinformationgatheredoverthepasttwodecadesis presentedhere. EthnographicworksalongcoastalareasincludesLlewellynLoud’sEthnogeographyandArchaeologyofthe Wiyot, Gladys Ayers Nomland’s Bear River Ethnography and Pliny Earle Goddard’s compilation of field notes. The archaeological data gathered by Loud (1913) is included below as a synthesis of species representedinthearchaeologicalrecord.However,Loudisveryclearinhisworkthatsubstantialcoastal resourceusewasbeingpracticedduringhisbriefvisittoWiyotterritory.ThereisclearevidenceinLoud (1913)ofcoastalresourceuseateachofthesiteslistedbelow,allareassociatedwitheithertheoceanor HumboldtBayandallweremajoruseareasin1850andmostwereinusein1908whenLoudvisitedwith theWiyotpeople. Figure 1 Wiyot Villages 189 Loudindicatesthattherewasintensiveuseofcoastalareasduringtheethnographicperiodthroughan unknown time depth (very little chronometric resources were available to him). Surf fishing and clammingoccurredonthesandybeaches,salmon,EelandsturgeonfishingontheMadandEelRivers, mussel and seaweed gathering along rocky shores and many places of spiritual significance were identifiedalongthecoast. Glady’sAyersNomlandworkedwiththeancestorsoftheBearRiverTribeproper.Selfidentifiedasthe Nekannis,thepeopleinhabitingthecoastsouthoftheEelRiverthroughandpastBearRivertothesouth, alsoutilizedasignificantportionofcoastalresources.Whileverylittleformalarchaeologicalworkhas beenconducted in this area due to private ownerships, there is a modicum of ancillary data gathered throughprivatecollectionrevealingaconsistentuseofcoastalresourceswhencomparedtotheWiyot and the Mattole and Sinkyone. The Nekannis also have spiritual areas located all along this coast. It appearsthatthereisacontinuumofspiritualandsubsistenceusethatareinextricablefromoneanother; allsubsistencegatheringisassociatedwithaceremonialorsocialfunctionwithspiritualconnections. Pliny Goddard’s field notes provide insight into the words of the ancestor’s of Bear River Band of RohnervilleRancheriawithoutediting.Wehavefoundthesenotestobeadirecthistoricalaccountofthe tribesrepresentedattheRancheriaandtheiraccuracyhasbeentestedthrougharchaeologicalfieldwork and oral testimony of the membership at the Rancheria. Included in the documents are evidence of continueduseofcoastalresourcesthroughthe1920’sandintothe1930’s.Goddarddocumentsevidence ofcontinuedinlandtradeofshells(variousspecies),seaweed,surffish,salmonandeels.Alsoimportant isevidenceofsandasbeingusedinceremony.Many,ifnotall,oftheonshoreandoffshorecoastalrocks are identified as places of ceremony. Villages are strewn throughout the area and specific resource locationsareidentified.Whileresourceprocurementareashavechangedovertime,asisevidencedin thearchaeologicalrecord,thisresourceishighlyamenabletolocationalinformationforspecificresources butasofnowtheonlywaytogarnerinformationisthroughacompletephysicalsearchofthedocuments, makingtheprocesscumbersomeandtimeconsuming. Baumhoff Goddard “A” Goddard “B” VillageName TribalGroup Source # # # 1 6 RR Sitcibi Mattole notecards 2 7 RR Sesnoiko " " 3 8 RR Sesnot " " 4 9 RR Sedjildaxdin " " 5 10 RR Gotxenin " " 6 11 RR Nebitta " " 7 12 RR Sebiye " " 8 13 RR Bekenoadin " " 9 14 RR Lasaiduk " " 10 15 RR Dzindin " " 11 16 RR Sastecdin " " 12 17 RR Senalindin " " 13 18 RR Kailistci " " 14 19 RR Saitcibi " " 15 RR 1 Bitcibi ShelterCove " people 16 RR 2 Deci Kuskic " 17 RR 3 Yinaki " " 18 20 RR Seyetci Mattole " 190 19 21 RR Sedanadaaibi " " 20 22 RR Daxdeginkatik " " 21 23 RR Daaibi " " 22 24 RR Bisyetobi " " 23 25 RR Tcegilticexbi " " 24 26 RR Solkaiye " " 25 27 RR Djetxenin " " 26 RR RR Djinsibbai "summercamp " 27 28 RR Djibbedaxtukkabi " " 28 29 RR Natsinnadaat " " 29 31 RR Sedjegunkoldin " " 30 30 RR Djegaslinabi " " 31 RR 4 Daloidin UpperMattole " people 32 RR 5 Djanoldin """ " 33 RR 6 Saiqotlundin """ " 34 RR 7 Godanindjaibi """ " 35 RR 8 Nowillenebi """ " 36 RR 9 Gonsakke """ " 37 RR
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brock, Lowry, Leon, Bailey, Woodward, Maple, Brett, Cripe and Cooper Families Susie Van Kirk
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Susie Van Kirk Papers Special Collections 1-2013 Brock, Lowry, Leon, Bailey, Woodward, Maple, Brett, Cripe and Cooper Families Susie Van Kirk Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/svk Part of the Genomics Commons Recommended Citation Van Kirk, Susie, "Brock, Lowry, Leon, Bailey, Woodward, Maple, Brett, Cripe and Cooper Families" (2013). Susie Van Kirk Papers. 8. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/svk/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Collections at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Susie Van Kirk Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Susie Van Kirk Historic Resources Consultant P.O Box 568 Bayside, CA 95524 [email protected] 707-822-6066 January 2013 BROCK, LOWRY, LEON, BAILEY, WOODWARD, MAPLE, BRETT, CRIPE AND COOPER FAMILIES Addendum, Feb. 2013 FE (16 Feb. 1894) Erick Thorsen and Yarnell Cooper have been brought from Orleans to Eureka charged with grand larceny in having killed a beef belonging to C.S. Hoffman and used it for food. FE (9 March 1894) Yarnell Cooper has been held to answer to charge of grand larceny [Thorsen released] FE (3 May 1895) Mrs. Thos. Brett, aged 21 years, died at Hoopa a few days since, of consumption. 1880 U.S. Census, Humboldt county, Redwood; Willow Creek precinct [Indian residents] 8. Jim, Capt., 40, Calif. 9. Mary, 30, wife 10. George, 12, son 11. Mary, 30 sister 12.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2020 Coordinated Tribal Assistance Solicitation Combined Award List Page 1 of 8 Nunakauyarmiut Tribe $500,950 1
    Department of Justice Fiscal Year 2020 Coordinated Tribal Assistance Solicitation Combined Award List ALASKA AMOUNT: $13,596,823 Alaska Native Justice Center $450,000 6. Children’s Justice Act Partnerships for Indian Communities (OVC) $450,000 Aleutian Pribilof Islands Association, Inc. $880,702 5. Violence Against Women Tribal Governments Program (OVW) $880,702 Asa'carsarmiut Tribal Council $387,415 1. Public Safety and Community Policing (COPS) $387,415 Central Council Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska $1,208,431 4. Tribal Justice System Infrastructure Program (BJA) $1,208,431 Fairbanks Native Association $416,030 9. Tribal Youth Program (OJJDP) $416,030 Kawerak, Inc. $1,229,928 3. Justice Systems and Alcohol and Substance Abuse (BJA) $813,898 9. Tribal Youth Program (OJJDP) $416,030 Koyukuk Native Village $437,628 1. Public Safety and Community Policing (COPS) $437,628 Maniilaq Association $699,015 5. Violence Against Women Tribal Governments Program (OVW) $699,015 Manokotak Village Council $362,390 1. Public Safety and Community Policing (COPS) $362,390 Native Village of Fort Yukon $390,820 1. Public Safety and Community Policing (COPS) $390,820 Native Village of Kwinhagak $306,123 1. Public Safety and Community Policing (COPS) $306,123 Native Village of Napakiak $453,859 1. Public Safety and Community Policing (COPS) $453,859 Native Village of Nunapitchuk $465,365 1. Public Safety and Community Policing (COPS) $465,365 Native Village of Port Graham $272,618 5. Violence Against Women Tribal Governments Program (OVW) $272,618 Native Village of Port Heiden $385,000 5. Violence Against Women Tribal Governments Program (OVW) $385,000 Native Village of Shageluk $413,426 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Project Partners
    Humboldt County Coastal Trail Implementation Strategy Technical Appendix JANUARY 2011 Prepared for: State of California Coastal Conservancy Project team: Natural Resources Services Division of Redwood Community Action Agency Alta Planning + Design Planwest Partners Streamline Planning Consultants Humboldt County Coastal Trail Implementation Strategy TECHNICAL APPENDICES Thank you to the community members and agency staff who provided input during public meetings and advisory team workshops throughout the planning process. Your participation and contributions are key to this and future efforts to bring the CCT to fruition. Peter Jarausch Project Manager State of California Coastal Conservancy [email protected] This plan was made possible through Proposition 40 funding Photo credits: Kids on bicycles, N. Wynne; Trail horses, U. Driscoll; Eureka boardwalk, J. Kalt All other photos by project team Appendix A: Project Partners Primary Partners ................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Federal Agencies .............................................................................................................................................................. 2 Bureau of Land Management (BLM) ....................................................................................................................... 2 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Background for Assets and Values at Risk, Humboldt
    HUMBOLDT COUNTY COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN, 2019 Table of Contents — Appendix D: Background Information for Assets and Values at Risk D.1 Communities at Risk ................................................................................................................... D-1 D.2 Community and Economic ......................................................................................................... D-4 Residential Construction and WUI Building Codes .......................................................................... D-4 D.3 Natural ....................................................................................................................................... D-9 Wildlife ............................................................................................................................................. D-9 Hydrology ....................................................................................................................................... D-10 Geology .......................................................................................................................................... D-11 Figures Figure D.1 Humboldt County Designated Communities at Risk .............................................................. D-1 Figure D.2. Improvement Value by Fire Hazard Severity Zone ................................................................. D-4 Figure D.3 Medical Facilities ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mattole River Cumulative Effects
    Mattole River Watershed Analysis Cumulative Watershed Effects Public Review Draft September 2011 Cumulative Watershed Effects TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS ........................................................................................................ vi LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF MAPS ........................................................................................................................ viii LIST OF ATTACHMENTS .......................................................................................................... x LIST OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................... xi 1.0 ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 OVERVIEW OF WATERSHED ANALYSIS PROCESS .................................................................. 6 2.2 PURPOSE AND ORGANIZATION OF REPORT .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Right Thing to Do: Returning Land to the Wiyot Tribe
    THE RIGHT THING TO DO: RETURNING LAND TO THE WIYOT TRIBE by Karen Elizabeth Nelson A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Humboldt State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts In Sociology May, 2008 THE RIGHT THING TO DO: RETURNING LAND TO THE WIYOT TRIBE by Karen Elizabeth Nelson Approved by the Master’s Thesis Committee: Jennifer Eichstedt, Committee Chair Date Elizabeth Watson, Committee Member Date Judith Little, Committee Member Date Jennifer Eichstedt, Graduate Coordinator Date Chris Hopper, Interim Dean for Research and Graduate Studies Date ABSTRACT THE RIGHT THING TO DO: RETURNING LAND TO THE WIYOT TRIBE Karen Elizabeth Nelson In 2004, the Eureka City Council legally returned forty acres of Indian Island to the Wiyot tribe. This return occurred one hundred and forty four years after the Indian Island massacre. This research explores the returning of sacred tribal land in the context of collective apologies and reconciliations after generations of Native genocide. The significance of this case study includes a detailed narration of how the land transfer occurred and more importantly why it was labeled “the right thing to do” by Eureka City Council members and staff. This case study was examined with a grounded theory methodology. Using no hypotheses, the research and the research methodology unfolded in a non-linear process, letting the research speak for itself. Detailed interviews and a review of documents were used to qualify and quantify this unique community based social act. The results of this case study include how and why the Eureka City Council returned forty acres of Indian Island to the Wiyot people.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Sandpaintings of Southern California
    UC Merced Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Title Indian Sandpaintings of Southern California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/59b7c0n9 Journal Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 9(1) ISSN 0191-3557 Author Cohen, Bill Publication Date 1987-07-01 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Journal of California and Great Basin Antliropology Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 4-34 (1987). Indian Sandpaintings of Southern California BILL COHEN, 746 Westholme Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90024. OANDPAINTINGS created by native south­ were similar in technique to the more elab­ ern Californians were sacred cosmological orate versions of the Navajo, they are less maps of the universe used primarily for the well known. This is because the Spanish moral instruction of young participants in a proscribed the religion in which they were psychedelic puberty ceremony. At other used and the modified native culture that times and places, the same constructions followed it was exterminated by the 1860s. could be the focus of other community ritu­ Southern California sandpaintings are among als, such as burials of cult participants, the rarest examples of aboriginal material ordeals associated with coming of age rites, culture because of the extreme secrecy in or vital elements in secret magical acts of which they were made, the fragility of the vengeance. The "paintings" are more accur­ materials employed, and the requirement that ately described as circular drawings made on the work be destroyed at the conclusion of the ground with colored earth and seeds, at the ceremony for which it was reproduced.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.6 Cultural Resources, Including Tribal Cultural Resources
    3.6 CULTURAL RESOURCES, INCLUDING TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES This section presents an evaluation of the potential impacts of project implementation on cultural resources. “Cultural resources” is a general term that encompasses CEQA’s historical resource and unique archaeological resource (see Section 3.6.2, “Regulatory Setting,” for definitions of historical resources and unique archaeological resources). Cultural resources may include archaeological traces such as early Native American occupation sites and artifacts, historic-age buildings and structures, and places used for traditional Native American observances or places with special cultural significance. These materials can be found at many locations on the landscape, and along with prehistoric and historic human remains and associated grave-goods, are protected under various state and local statutes. Tribal cultural resources are sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe. During the public scoping comment period, comments relevant to tribal lands and artifacts, and previous Scotia EIRs that addressed historical resource planning, protection, and the special Scotia Historic Resource Protection zoning provisions were received. These topics are discussed in this section. 3.6.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The information in this section was collected from the following cultural resources technical reports that were prepared for the project applicant. They included the results of a records search, lists
    [Show full text]
  • Drought and Equity in California
    Drought and Equity in California Laura Feinstein, Rapichan Phurisamban, Amanda Ford, Christine Tyler, Ayana Crawford January 2017 Drought and Equity in California January 2017 Lead Authors Laura Feinstein, Senior Research Associate, Pacific Institute Rapichan Phurisamban, Research Associate, Pacific Institute Amanda Ford, Coalition Coordinator, Environmental Justice Coalition for Water Christine Tyler, Water Policy Leadership Intern, Pacific Institute Ayana Crawford, Water Policy Leadership Intern, Pacific Institute Drought and Equity Advisory Committee and Contributing Authors The Drought and Equity Advisory Committee members acted as contributing authors, but all final editorial decisions were made by lead authors. Sara Aminzadeh, Executive Director, California Coastkeeper Alliance Colin Bailey, Executive Director, Environmental Justice Coalition for Water Carolina Balazs, Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley Wendy Broley, Staff Engineer, California Urban Water Agencies Amanda Fencl, PhD Student, University of California, Davis Center for Environmental Policy and Behavior Kelsey Hinton, Program Associate, Community Water Center Gita Kapahi, Director, Office of Public Participation, State Water Resources Control Board Brittani Orona, Environmental Justice and Tribal Affairs Specialist and Native American Studies Doctoral Student, University of California, Davis Brian Pompeii, Lecturer, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Tim Sloane, Executive Director, Institute for Fisheries Resources ISBN-978-1-893790-76-6 © 2017 Pacific Institute. All rights reserved. Pacific Institute 654 13th Street, Preservation Park Oakland, California 94612 Phone: 510.251.1600 | Facsimile: 510.251.2203 www.pacinst.org Cover Photos: Clockwise from top left: NNehring, Debargh, Yykkaa, Marilyn Nieves Designer: Bryan Kring, Kring Design Studio Drought and Equity in California I ABOUT THE PACIFIC INSTITUTE The Pacific Institute envisions a world in which society, the economy, and the environment have the water they need to thrive now and in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Dee-Ni' Wee-Ya' Lhetlh-Xat 1
    Dee-ni' Wee-ya' Lhetlh-xat 1 Dee-ni' (Tolowa) language class Textbook 1 Day min' ch'v-ghvt-te'sr (table of content) Title Description Page Number Dan'-waa-ghii~-li~ (history) Language history and current status. 3 Wee-ya' Xwan-tee-ne (language hunter) Teaching language learns how to teach themselves. 24 Dv-laa-ha~ Wee-ya' Slaa Introductions unit 25 Xwee-cha~ Wee-ya' Slaa Weather unit 28 Dee-dvt-nish Wee-ya' Slaa Physical feelings unit 33 Mee-dvt-nish Wee-ya' Slaa Emotional feelings unit 36 Yuu-t'i Wee-ya' Slaa Noun unit 39 Naa-ghvt-na' Wee-ya' Slaa Verbs unit 42 Tv-xvm-t'i Wee-ya' Slaa Postpositions unit 48 Srtaa~ Wee-ya' Slaa Food unit 53 Taa-chv-ghvt-la Wee-ya' Slaa Color unit 55 Taa-chv-ghvt-la nat-trvsh Wee-ya' Slaa Color and clothes unit 56 Tr'vlh-tak yuu-t'I Wee-ya' Slaa Number nouns unit 59 Nay-talh Srtaa~ Wee-ya' Slaa Color with like unit 60 Srii-nis Wee-ya' Slaa Day unit 65 Ghvt-ti~lh Wee-ya' Slaa Time unit 68 Dii-dvn Mvn-taa-dvn Tash Wee-ya' Slaa Modern town, going unit 70 Da'-ye' Wee-ya' Slaa Family unit 74 2 Taa-laa-wa Dee-ni' Dan'-waa-ghii~-li~ "The Tolowa Dee-ni’ History" I. The Taa-laa-waa-dvn A. Dee-ni' / Xvsh The aboriginal lands of the Tolowa Dee-ni', the Taa-laa-waa-dvn, lay along the Pacific coast between Wilson Creek to the south, Sixes River to the north and inland to the Applegate River.
    [Show full text]
  • California Gambling Control Commission Revenue Sharing Trust Fund Recipients March 4, 2009
    CALIFORNIA GAMBLING CONTROL COMMISSION REVENUE SHARING TRUST FUND RECIPIENTS MARCH 4, 2009 TRIBE CASINO LOCATION 1 Alturas Indian Rancheria Desert Rose Casino Alturas 2 Bear River Band of Rohnerville Rancheria Bear River Casino Loleta 3 Benton Paiute Reservation N/A Benton 4 Big Lagoon Rancheria N/A Trinidad 5 Big Pine Reservation N/A Big Pine 6 Big Sandy Rancheria Mono Wind Casino Auberry Konocti Vista 7 Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians Lakeport Casino Paiute Palace 8 Bishop Paiute Tribe Bishop Casino 9 Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony N/A Bridgeport 10 Buena Vista Rancheria N/A Ione 11 Cahto Indian Tribe of Laytonville Rancheria Red Fox Casino Laytonville Cahuilla Creek 12 Cahuilla Band of Mission Indians Anza Casino 13 California Valley Miwok Tribe N/A Stockton 14 Cedarville Rancheria N/A Alturas Havasu Landing 15 Chemehuevi Indian Tribe Havasu Lake Resort and Casino Cher-Ae-Heights 16 Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community Trinidad Casino Chicken Ranch 17 Chicken Ranch Rancheria Jamestown Bingo and Casino 18 Cloverdale Rancheria N/A Cloverdale 19 Cold Springs Rancheria N/A Tollhouse CALIFORNIA GAMBLING CONTROL COMMISSION REVENUE SHARING TRUST FUND RECIPIENTS MARCH 4, 2009 TRIBE CASINO LOCATION 20 Colorado River Indian Tribes N/A Parker, AZ 1 21 Cortina Rancheria N/A Williams Coyote Valley 22 Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians Redwood Valley Shodakai Casino 23 Death Valley Timba-Sha Shoshone Tribe N/A Death Valley 24 Elem Indian Colony N/A Clearlake Oaks 25 Elk Valley Rancheria Elk Valley Casino Crescent City 26 Enterprise Rancheria N/A Oroville
    [Show full text]
  • Ritual Management of Salmonid Fish Resources in California
    UC Merced The Journal of California Anthropology Title Ritual Management of Salmonid Fish Resources in California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0rg7c5vf Journal The Journal of California Anthropology, 4(1) Authors Swezey, Sean L Heizer, Robert F Publication Date 1977-07-01 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Scaffold for A-frame net fbhing. Karok man pladn( net Into water. Ca. 1900. After Krocber and Barrett (1962:Plate 2). Courtesy of the Lowie Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley. Ritual Management of Salmonid Fish Resources in California SEAN L. SWEZEY ROBERT F. HEIZER THNOGRAPHERS at times are more nets, toggle harpoons, and application of bo­ Econcerned with reporting data than tanical fish poisons. interpreting them. As a result, ethnographies Whereas the material aspects of fishery often have the appearance of being little more technology form a basic and informative part than collections of facts organized by a gener­ of the ethnographic record, the potential im­ ally standardized topical outline. Synoptic portance of specialized ritual procedures surveys may result from an effort to synthesize undertaken at the inception of anadromous a particular trait, custom, or complex, and fish runs has generally been overlooked. from these there often results a deeper insight Through much of Northern California, ritual into the function and purpose of what, in injunctions and social control mechanisms unanalyzed form, seem to be cultural prac­ were instituted by specific "ritual specialists" tices which are illogical or meaningless. We (formulists, shamans, and moiety chiefs) at the attempt here to review native ritual, belief, and outset of the first major seasonal migrations of ceremony connected with anadromous fish in salmon.
    [Show full text]