London Assembly 11Am Wednesday 9 July 2003

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

London Assembly 11Am Wednesday 9 July 2003 Minutes: London Assembly 11am Wednesday 9 July 2003 Present Sally Hamwee (Chair) Toby Harris Samantha Heath (Deputy Chair) Meg Hillier Tony Arbour Elizabeth Howlett Jennette Arnold Diana Johnson Richard Barnes Darren Johnson John Biggs Jenny Jones Angie Bray Noel Lynch Brian Coleman Bob Neill Len Duvall Eric Ollerenshaw Roger Evans Andrew Pelling Lynne Featherstone Valerie Shawcross Nicky Gavron Graham Tope Mike Tuffrey 1. APOLOGIES (Item 1) There were none 2. DECLARATION OF INTERESTS (Item 2) A list of the membership of Functional Bodies and London Boroughs was tabled and is attached at Appendix A to these minutes. City Hall, The Queen’s Walk, London SE1 2AA Enquiries: 020 7983 4100 minicom: 020 7983 4458 www.london.gov.uk 3. INTRODUCTION BY THE CHAIR (Item 3) Welcome to an important day, and a very warm welcome to friends from the whole of London, colleagues from the London Assembly and the London boroughs, as well as the whole of the GLA, and from the German community. In particular we welcome Walter Momper on what, I think, is a significant day. The Mayor has a partnership agreement with the Mayor of Berlin, and today we mark the start of partnership joint working with the House of Representatives. We will now ask Walter Momper, President, to speak to us. 4. WALTER MOMPER, PRESIDENT OF THE BERLIN HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Chair, dear Sally, Mayor Livingstone, dear Ken, Members of the House, colleagues, Ladies and Gentlemen, Excellencies, it is a great honour and pleasure for me to speak here. Thank you very much for your warm me. I hope that I can express the great affection and feelings of friendship that unite the British and German people, and the people of Berlin and London. I hope that my visit will contribute to a further development of the city partnerships. Sally already talked about the close partnership that the Mayors of both cities have, and I think that now is the time to expand the connection to the parliamentary assemblies of both cities and, of course, for the exchange of the experience that we have. Firstly, I send you the greetings and the best wishes of the House of Representatives – the Abgeordnetenhaus – of Berlin. I really can see that Berlin’s city partnership with London is very important for us, for all five parliamentary groups that we have in the Abgeordnetenhaus, a little more than you have. We have the Greens, the Reds, those who call themselves the Blacks, the Yellows, and the Blues. We also have the very Red ones. So you see the colours are the same. I believe that this is a good starting point for further contacts between our cities, and I also think that we have reason to be optimistic in this respect. Ladies and gentlemen, our friendship with Great Britain is, for us, something which is not just politically important, but rather it comes from the heart. We in Berlin have not forgotten that Great Britain was one of our protecting powers in the past during the era of the Cold War, and of course what we owe to the British people and, of course, to the British armed forces who have done their constant duty in the Berlin garrison. Let me look back for a moment at the consequences of the Second World War. Germany, Europe and Berlin were divided after 1945; the western half of the city was under the control of the US, Britain and France, whereas the eastern part of the city was under control of the Soviet Union. West Berlin’s existence and freedom were threatened for decades by the Soviet Union and the former GDR, or East Germany. The three western allied powers defended the western part of the city and defended its freedom. Remember that in 1948-1949, Great Britain played an important part during the time of the Berlin Blockade and the Berlin Airlift. Day and night, American and British airplanes came to our city and brought to the city what was needed there to live and to survive. The German-British friendship grew in Berlin during that time, and it became stronger and stronger in the following decades in 2 - - times of threat, when in 1958 the Kruschev ultimatum really was a great danger for the city, and for world peace, of course. The Wall was erected in 1961, and the friendship between Germany and Great Britain was very much alive when the wall fell in November 1989. Germany was reunited in October 1990, when the allied troops were withdrawn from Germany and from Berlin. Changes in world politics in the 1980s, the end of confrontation between East and West, and globalisation, created new international constellations to which we all have to adjust - you in London, we in Berlin; you in Britain, we in Germany. Countries that once regarded themselves as enemies were now working together, and especially the countries of Eastern Europe have become partners since 1990. It was this development that also made German reunification possible. We know that many people in Great Britain, in view of the past, were sceptical over the idea of a reunited Germany. Nevertheless, Great Britain consented to German reunification. For Germans, especially for those in Berlin, German reunification led to radical changes in life, changes for which people were unprepared. 40 years of separation within one people has resulted in differences in mentality in east and west and we still have enormous problems overcoming these differences in mentality. Reservation and suspicion have to be overcome. The people in the two halves of the city have grown apart. They have different life experiences, and now have to find common ground and new common standards for their social, political, economic and daily lives. The city itself had to change as well. It became the German capital again, and the seat of the Bundestag and the Federal Government. In other words, it became the centre of political decision- making in our country. Thirteen years after German reunification we can say that a new Berlin has emerged, a Berlin as a meeting place of nations, a market place of ideas, a cultural metropolis in the middle of Europe. Today, Berlin has more to offer than ever before: a great many creative young minds, and an outstanding scientific and academic landscape, with very close ties between science and industry. Berlin is an ideal location for the dialogue between cultures. We have people from over 190 countries - although you probably have even more in this city - living together peacefully in Germany’s capital city now. It is its geographical location, historical experience and, not least, its cultural diversity, which make Berlin the city of encounters. We believe that we have historical obligations to do everything we can to make it possible for Christians, Muslims, people from all parts of the world, Jews, as well as other faiths, to live there together in peace, in Germany and especially in Berlin. Berlin is also a city of knowledge. We have a big landscape of universities, research institutions and this makes Berlin an innovative city. New medicine, communications, IT, media, all that a modern big city has, is typical for Berlin. Infrastructure and the telecommunications network meet high standards, and a great gift of German unity is that we got this money, not only from the private sector but from federal government and agencies, to renew the whole infrastructure, because it was old and rotten and did not fit the today’s needs. 3 - - Berlin is also on the way to becoming a city of service providers, a trade fair and congress city, and so on. Today, Berlin is one of the world’s most exciting cities. Thirteen years ago, on the evening of November 9th, Berliners fell into each others’ arms on the Berlin Wall when it had just come down. Today only a few pieces of the Wall can remain, and Berlin is looking forward. We have a high percentage of young people among the population - about 35% are under the age of 35 - and 1 million Berlin residents have come to the city in the last 10 years. Berlin is now located in the middle of a new, united Europe, and that is why the extension eastwards of the European Union is so important for us. It is a chance for the future, and we want to develop close cooperation with our partners in the EU and far beyond, in the west as well as the east. As in no other city, the face of Berlin has changed. It was a city of crisis, of politics and of the east- west confrontation, and now it is set to become a city of opportunity, although the city is still suffering, especially with regard to budget and financing, from the division of the past, which takes some time to overcome. It is good to know that the city of Berlin has friends all over the world, which is an investment into the future of our city. Berlin maintains partnerships with 16 capital cities and we plan to cultivate this network of friendship. We believe that it is important for people to be connected, not only on the national level but also on the municipal level. We should work together to ensure that the friendship between cities also plays an important role in our practical policy. Ladies and gentlemen, the success of city partnership also involves cooperation, and the exchange of experience, between city policy-makers. At the same time, however, we need to keep in mind differences in administrative structures and political structures.
Recommended publications
  • Tageszeitung (Taz) Article on the Opening of the Berlin Wall
    Volume 10. One Germany in Europe, 1989 – 2009 The Fall of the Berlin Wall (November 9, 1989) Two journalists from Die Tageszeitung (taz), a left-of-center West Berlin newspaper, describe the excitement generated by the sudden opening of the Berlin Wall on November 9, 1989. The event was the result of internal pressure applied by East German citizens, and it evoked spontaneous celebration from a people who could once again freely cross the border and rekindle relationships with friends and relatives on the other side. (Please note: the dancing bear mentioned below is a figurative reference to West Berlin's official mascot. Beginning in 1954, the flag of West Berlin featured a red bear set against a white background. In 1990, the bear became the mascot of a unified Berlin. The former West Berlin flag now represents the city as a whole.) "We Want In!" The Bear Is Dancing on the Border Around midnight, RIAS – the American radio station broadcasting to the East – still has no traffic interruptions to report. Yet total chaos already reigns at the border checkpoint on Invalidenstrasse. People parked their cars at all conceivable angles, jumped out, and ran to the border. The transmission tower of the radio station "Free Berlin" is already engulfed by a throng of people (from the West) – waiting for the masses (from the East) to break through. After three seconds, even the most hardened taz editor finds himself applauding the first Trabi he sees. Everyone gets caught up in the frenzy, whether she wants to or not. Even the soberest members of the crowd are applauding, shrieking, gasping, giggling.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project AMBASSADOR HARRY JOSEPH GILMORE Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: February 3, 2003 Copyright 2012 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born and raised in Pennsylvania Carnegie Institute of Technology (Carnegie Mellon University) University of Pittsburgh Indiana University Marriage Entered the Foreign Service in 1962 A,100 Course Ankara. Turkey/ 0otation Officer1Staff Aide 1962,1963 4upiter missiles Ambassador 0aymond Hare Ismet Inonu 4oint US Military Mission for Aid to Turkey (4USMAT) Turkish,US logistics Consul Elaine Smith Near East troubles Operations Cyprus US policy Embassy staff Consular issues Saudi isa laws Turkish,American Society Internal tra el State Department/ Foreign Ser ice Institute (FSI)7 Hungarian 1963,1968 9anguage training Budapest. Hungary/ Consular Officer 1968,1967 Cardinal Mindszenty 4anos Kadar regime 1 So iet Union presence 0elations Ambassador Martin Hillenbrand Israel Economy 9iberalization Arab,Israel 1967 War Anti,US demonstrations Go ernment restrictions Sur eillance and intimidation En ironment Contacts with Hungarians Communism Visa cases (pro ocations) Social Security recipients Austria1Hungary relations Hungary relations with neighbors 0eligion So iet Mindszenty concerns Dr. Ann 9askaris Elin OAShaughnessy State Department/ So iet and Eastern Europe EBchange Staff 1967,1969 Hungarian and Czech accounts Operations Scientists and Scholars eBchange programs Effects of Prague Spring 0elations
    [Show full text]
  • After the Wall: 20 Years On
    FEATURE AFTER THE WALL: 20 YEARS ON Oliver Marc Hartwich looks at Germany’s unification history wenty years ago, the Germans were When we commemorate the events of 9 the ‘happiest people on Earth.’ This November 1989, our first thought should be with is how Walter Momper, the mayor these victims of the Wall. of Berlin, summed up the mood They died because they wanted to be free. when he addressed a crowd gathered We should not forget the other victims of the Toutside West Berlin’s Town Hall the day after the East German regime, either. The people whose Wall had been opened. lives were ruined by the secret police; whose For nearly three decades, the monstrosity of the ambitions were thwarted because they did not Wall had torn apart friends, families and lovers. It conform to the communist ideology; who were was an inhumane scar running right through the imprisoned, tortured and killed for their beliefs. heart of Berlin. Where once there had been vibrant The 9th of November signalled the end of streets and town squares, the death strip had turned their suffering. It quite literally opened the gates the city centre into an eerie no-man’s land. to a new life. The Wall had been built by the communist For these reasons, the Germans were indeed rulers of East Germany in August 1961 as more the happiest people on Earth in those November and more people were leaving behind oppression days of 1989. The end of the second German and misery for a better life in the West.
    [Show full text]
  • Protokoll 16 / 49
    Plenarprotokoll 16 / 49 16. Wahlperiode 49. Sitzung Berlin, Donnerstag, 11. Juni 2009 Inhalt ......................................................................... Seite Inhalt ........................................................................ Seite Nachruf Fragestunde – Mündliche Anfragen ehemaliger Abgeordneter Peter Vetter ................ 4505 Kein Kindergeld für Eltern inhaftierter Straftäter/-innen Geschäftliches Dr. Fritz Felgentreu (SPD) ....................... 4506, 4507 Glückwünsche zur Verpartnerung Senatorin Gisela von der Aue ................... 4506, 4507 Dirk Behrendt (Grüne) ........................................ 4507 für Dr. Klaus Lederer (Linksfraktion) ................. 4505 Wie viel heiße Luft erzeugt der Bildungszuschlag Für erledigt erklärter Antrag in den Kindertagesstätten? Drs 16/0333 ......................................................... 4505 Emine Demirbüken-Wegner (CDU) ......... 4507, 4508 Zurückgezogener Antrag Senator Dr. Jürgen Zöllner ....................... 4507, 4508 Drs 16/1501 ......................................................... 4505 Elfi Jantzen (Grüne) ............................................ 4508 Anträge auf Durchführung einer Ausdehnung des Neuköllner Modells Aktuellen Stunde ..................................................... 4505 Dr. Margrit Barth (Linksfraktion) ....................... 4509 Liste der Dringlichkeiten ....................................... 4591 Senatorin Gisela von der Aue ................... 4509, 4510 Dirk Behrendt (Grüne) .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • 50 Jahre DGVT – Chronologie Der Ereignisse Zusammengestellt Von Bernhard Scholten Nach Berichten in Den GVT/DGVT- Mitteilungen
    50 Jahre DGVT – Chronologie der Ereignisse zusammengestellt von Bernhard Scholten nach Berichten in den GVT/DGVT- Mitteilungen und der Verhaltenstherapie und psychosozialen Praxis (VPP) Teil 1: Die ersten 25 Jahre von der Vorgeschichte über 1968 bis 1992 Vorgeschichte: In den 50er Jahren des 20. Jahrhunderts entwickelten Burrhus F. Skinner in den USA, Hans-Jürgen Eysenck in England sowie Joseph Wolpe und Arnold Lazarus zu- erst in Südafrika, später in den USA erste auf lernpsychologischen Grundlagen beru- hende psychotherapeutische Methoden, die sie „Behaviour Therapy“ oder „Behavior Therapy“ gelegentlich auch „Behavior modification“ nannten. Erna Duhm und Albert Görres brachten diese im anglo-amerikanischen Raum entwi- ckelten Methoden nach Deutschland; Duhm nach Göttingen, Görres erst nach Mainz, dann nach München. Sie boten erste „verhaltenstherapeutische Seminare“ an. 1963 gründete sich die Sektion Klinische Psychologie im Berufsverband Deutscher Psychologen (BDP). 1965 wird Johannes C. Brengelmann Leiter der psychologi- schen Abteilung des Max-Planck-Instituts für Psychiatrie (MPI) in München. Brengel- mann vertritt einen streng behavorialen Kurs. 1966 wird Albert Görres erster Inhaber eines Lehrstuhls für klinische Psychologie an der LMU München. Jarg Bergold und Klaus M. Mandler übernehmen die Leitung der verhaltenstherapeutischen Ambulanz an der LMU. An der 1964 neugegründeten Ruhr-Universität Bochum wird 1966 eine Beratungsstelle für Studierende unter Lei- tung von Eva Jaeggi und Ingeborg Jöhrens eingerichtet, die verhaltenstherapeutisch arbeitet. 1968 Die Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Verhaltenstherapie wird in München (GVT) ge- gründet. Johannes Brengelmann, Peter Gottwald, Jarg Bergold, Eibe-Rudolf Rey, Wolfgang Tunner bilden den 1. Vorstand. Lilly Kemmler erhält den Lehrstuhl für klini- sche Psychologie in Münster. Frederick C. Kanfer ist mit einem Fulbright-Stipendium an der Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
    [Show full text]
  • Heft 2 / April 2014 ISSN 0042-5702 B 2176 F Die Anfänge Des Privatkundengeschäfts Der Grossbanken
    62. Jahrgang / Heft 2 / April 2014 ISSN 0042-5702 B 2176 F Die Anfänge DeS PriVAtkunDengeSchäftS Der groSSBAnken Zeitgeschichte 2014 Zeitgeschichte für herausgegeben von Helmut Altrichter Horst Möller Andreas Wirsching Aus dem Inhalt Jenny Pleinen/Lutz Raphael Schriftenreihe der Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte, Band 108 Vierteljahrshefte Zeithistoriker in den Archiven der Sozialwissenschaften 5 | 2014. ca. 272 Seiten Broschur 978-3-486-76462-8 € 24,95 Hajime Konno ebook 978-3-11-034525-4 € 24,95 print + eBook 978-3-11-036296-1 € 39,95 Die liberalen und konservativen Interpretationen der deutschen Politik an der Kaiserlichen Universität Tokio 1905–1933 Großbanken symbolisieren wie kaum eine andere Institution das kapitalistische Wirtschaftssystem. Hans Schafranek Um 1870 entstanden, erlangten sie in kürzester Zeit eine beherrschende Stellung in der deutschen NS-Fememorde in der Steiermark Wirtschaft. Für die breite Bevölkerung interessierten sie sich bis Mitte des 20. Jahrhunderts aber nicht. Erst im Gefolge des Wirtschaftswunders, als der Durchschnittsbürger allmählich zu Sven Feyer einem Wirtschaftsfaktor wurde, bemühten sich die Deutsche Bank, die Dresdner Bank und die Otto Meyer: MAN-Vorstand im Dritten Reich Commerzbank mit neuen Finanzprodukten um das „gemeine Volk“ und seine Spargroschen. In seiner Studie, die 2013 den Preis für Unternehmensgeschichte erhalten hat, untersucht Simon Thorsten Holzhauser Gonser, wie die drei Kreditinstitute in den 1950er und 1960er Jahren die Basis für ihr heutiges „Niemals mit der PDS“? Privatkundengeschäft legten und welche wirtschaftlichen, gesellschaftlichen und sozialen Zum Umgang der SPD mit der SED-Nachfolgepartei zwischen ­­ Rahmenbedingungen dabei eine Rolle spielten. Ausgrenzungs- und Integrationsstrategie (1990–1998) Simon Gonser ist stellv. Leiter des Kreisarchivs Rems-Murr-Kreis in Waiblingen (Baden- Württemberg).
    [Show full text]
  • Dodis.Ch/52958 Netherlands Telegram1 from the Dutch
    dodis.ch/52958 77 15 dodis.ch/52958 Netherlands Telegram1 from the Dutch Ambassador in Bonn, Jan van der Tas2, to the Dutch Minister of Foreign Affairs, Hans van den Broek3 Berlin 9 November 1989 – the Wall Loses its Relevance Extract Confidential Bonn, 14 November 1989 […]4 Report “Ab sofort” was the answer of the SED Politburo member responsible for in- formation, Schabowski5, after the meeting of the Central Committee on the 9th on the question when the arrangement for travel to the Federal Republic and West Berlin that he had just made public would enter into force. A directive that he pre- sumed was already known to the assembled press, but which he himself clearly did not know intimately. The border guards were also unprepared, but confront- ed by the inflowing masses they threw open the gates at the Borholmer Strasse crossing, stepped back and let the flow of people pass by. Shortly afterwards the other border crossings followed including Checkpoint Charlie. The Wall had – in the words of governing mayor Momper6 – lost its relevance. On 9 November 1989, this inhuman and monstrous edifice that was founded on 13 August 1961 fell. The cornered leadership of the collapsing “First State of Workers and Farmers on German Soil”7 had risked the desperate flight forward to stem the bloodlet- ting of “Republikflucht”8 and regain the trust of the population. In Berlin (West) this “Day of Re-Encounter”9 (Momper) led to an emotionally charged cheerfully chaotic exuberant weekend in which nearly two million peo- ple from the Eastern Sector and all parts of the GDR flowed into the city.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER No. 40 May 31St, 2002
    ___________________________________________________________________________ NEWSLETTER No. 40 May 31st, 2002 Marlene Dietrich Collection Berlin is a division of Filmmuseum Berlin - Deutsche Kinemathek If you want your fellow fans to receive this newsletter or if you just want to add informations write to [email protected] . If you want to support the work of the Filmmuseum Berlin-Deutsche Kinemathek of which Marlene Dietrich Collection Berlin is a division you can do so by joining the "Friends and Supporters of Filmmuseum Berlin". Just go to http://www.fffb.de ___________________________________________________________________________ Dear fans and friends, “Ernest Hemingway once said about Marlene May again has been a busy month. It marked Dietrich: ‘If she only had her voice, she could the tenth anniversary of Marlenes death date break your heart.’ Today we are once again with the highlight of journalists at the grave who able to see how right he was. did not ask questions but simply hold their micophones to your mouth and said: “Say Marlene Dietrich’s voice touches us – not only something”. At least, they could think of a with its modulation, which is colored by age and question, didn’t they. her experience in life, but especially because On May 16th Marlene was declared Honorary of her clear and uncompromising attitude Citizen of Berlin – the first person ever to towards Berlin and her role as a Berliner in receive this honor after her death. We listened Germany’s political history. And not least also to music, to speeches and again Marlene made because of the many images that her voice the headline as she did all her lifetime.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Union Und Die Deutsche Einheit
    These 4 Die Union hat als einzige Partei von der Westbindung Konrad Adenauers bis zur Deutschlandpolitik Helmut Kohls öffentlich und auch gegen große Widerstände immer am Ziel der deutschen Einheit in Freiheit festgehalten. —·—·— Die Union und die deutsche Einheit Horst Möller Als Konrad Adenauer am 20. September 1949 seine erste Regierungserklärung als Bundeskanzler abgab, betonte er: „Die Teilung Deutschlands wird eines Tages – das ist un- sere feste Überzeugung – wieder verschwinden. Ich fürchte, dass, wenn sie nicht verschwindet, in Europa keine Ruhe eintreten wird. Diese Teilung Deutschlands ist durch Span- nungen herbeigeführt worden, die zwischen den Sieger- mächten entstanden sind. Auch diese Spannungen werden vorübergehen: Wir hoffen, dass dann der Wiedervereini- gung mit unseren Brüdern und Schwestern in der Ostzone und Berlin nichts mehr im Wege steht.“ Damals, viereinhalb Jahre nach Kriegsende, war das wohl die Einschätzung der meisten Deutschen. Als vierzig Jahre danach die Mauer in Berlin geöffnet wurde und die kommunistische Diktatur sang- und klanglos, ja durch die Pressekonferenz vom 9. November 1989 mit dem Bei- geschmack der Lächerlichkeit zusammenbrach, kam dies für die meisten Beobachter überraschend, wenngleich sich die Zeichen für die Schwäche der DDR durch verstärkte Fluchtbewegungen und Massenproteste während des gan- zen Jahres gemehrt hatten. Wesentlich war auch, dass die 57 Horst Möller Sowjetunion unter Führung Michail Gorbatschows seit 1985 Reformversuche im ebenfalls maroden sowjetkom- munistischen System unternommen hatte und den Auf- lösungstendenzen in den Staaten des Warschauer Paktes nicht, wie früher üblich, durch den Einmarsch der Roten Armee begegnete. Die Niederschlagung der Aufstände, die am 17. Juni 1953 in der DDR, 1956 in Ungarn und 1968 in der Tschechoslowakei erfolgte, ließ sich auch aufgrund des Desasters in Afghanistan, wo die Sowjetunion um die Jah- reswende 1979/80 einmarschiert war, nicht wiederholen.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2013-2014
    The A Assppeenn IInnssttiittuuttee GGeerrmmaannyy ANNUAL REPOORRT 2013 2007 2014 The Aspen Institute Germany ANNUAL REPORT 2013 2014 Zlatko Lagumdžija, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Bosnia and Herzegovina Ditmir Bushati, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Albania Philip Hammond, Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, United Kingdom Nikola Poposki, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Macedonia Dr. Frank Walter Steinmeier, Federal Minister of Foreign Affairs, Germany Ivica Dačić, First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, Serbia Prof. Dr. Vesna Pusić, First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign and European Affairs, Croatia Dr. Enver Hoxhaj, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Kosovo Dr. Igor Lukšić, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, Montenegro Hoyt Yee, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, U.S. Department of State ASPEN INSTITUTE Annual Report 3 GERMANY 2013/2014 PREFACE Dear Friend of the Aspen Institute Germany, The past year marked a very special occasion for the Aspen Institute Germany as it celebrated its 40th an- niversary. Founded in 1974 in the midst of the Cold War, the Institute was envisioned as a bulwark against dicta- torship and a symbol of freedom in the divided city of Berlin. Under the charismatic leadership of its first di- rector Shepard Stone, the Institute established a unique track record of building German-U.S. cooperation and dialog with the former Soviet Union. Ever since, it has been continuing this tradition of building bridges be- tween East and West and enabling constructive dialog amongst conflicting parties, promoting Euro-Atlantic co- operation, and enhancing a strong open society. To highlight the accomplishments of these four decades, Aspen Germany hosted its first Berlin Transatlantic Forum in October 2014, dedicated to opening new per- spectives for the Transatlantic partnership and for the fu- ture of European-American relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: the Historian As a Detective
    Notes Introduction: The Historian as a Detective 1. In preparation of the two-part “docu-drama” titled Deutschlandspiel (German Game) to mark the tenth anniversary of the reunification of Germany, along with other broadcasters the Zweite Deutsche Fernsehen (ZDF) had had around 60 interviews conducted with the international main actors in the process. I took part in these. Deutschlandspiel was produced by Ulrich Lenze, and Hans- Christoph Blumenberg was the director. Blumenberg conducted a largest num- ber of the interviews, while Thomas Schuhbauer and I conducted a smaller number. I also wrote the treatment and served as an academic advisor for the film project. 2. Compare the literature at the end of this book. 3. The official files of Gorbachev’s talks with other politicians are in the Presidential Archive. Those in the Gorbachev Foundation in Moscow that I was able to look at were prepared at the time by clerks and translators. Most were countersigned by Chernayev himself, the main “note-taker” then. These meeting minutes stand apart under the comparisons that I carried out and appear, among others, to be authentic, because critical statements or sections are included, in which Gorbachev does not appear in the best light. Nor have I found any “retrospective foreshadowing” of particular views of Gorbachev or his discussion partners. The Politburo minutes are not official minutes, but rather later compilations of the notes made during the meetings by Medvedev, Skhakhnazarov, who has died, and Chernayev—that is, by Gorbachev’s people. These Politburo minutes also give a credible impression, particularly naturally in their original note form.
    [Show full text]
  • Minderheitsregierungen in Deutschland
    Minderheitsregierungen in Deutschland Stephan Klecha Landesbüro Niedersachsen Minderheitsregierungen in Deutschland Stephan Klecha Friedrich-Ebert-Stifung Impressum Herausgeber: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Landesbüro Niedersachsen Theaterstraße 3 30159 Hannover E-Mail: [email protected] Telefon: 0511 357708 - 30 www.fes.de/niedersachsen Autor: Dr. Stephan Klecha Redaktion: Petra Wilke Lektorat: Bettina Munimus Layout: Pellens Kommunikationsdesign GmbH Druck: bub Bonner Universitäts-Buchdruckerei Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Printed in Germany 2010 ISBN: 978-3-86872-594-0 MINDERHEITSREGIERUNGEN IN DEUTSCHLAND Inhalt Vorbemerkung ....................................................................................................7 Vorwort von Ministerpräsidentin Hannelore Kraft ................................................9 Einleitung .......................................................................................................... 12 Parlamentarisches Regierungssystem und Mehrheitsprinzip ............................14 Einfl ussfaktor Parteiensystem ......................................................................... 18 Alternativen zur gewohnten Mehrheitsregierung ........................................... 25 Stabilität von Minderheitsregierungen ............................................................30 Handlungsstärken von Regierungen ...............................................................32 Regieren ohne Mehrheiten ............................................................................. 37 Exekutive Eigenverantwortung
    [Show full text]