Annual Report 2013-2014

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report 2013-2014 The A Assppeenn IInnssttiittuuttee GGeerrmmaannyy ANNUAL REPOORRT 2013 2007 2014 The Aspen Institute Germany ANNUAL REPORT 2013 2014 Zlatko Lagumdžija, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Bosnia and Herzegovina Ditmir Bushati, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Albania Philip Hammond, Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, United Kingdom Nikola Poposki, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Macedonia Dr. Frank Walter Steinmeier, Federal Minister of Foreign Affairs, Germany Ivica Dačić, First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, Serbia Prof. Dr. Vesna Pusić, First Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign and European Affairs, Croatia Dr. Enver Hoxhaj, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Kosovo Dr. Igor Lukšić, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, Montenegro Hoyt Yee, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, U.S. Department of State ASPEN INSTITUTE Annual Report 3 GERMANY 2013/2014 PREFACE Dear Friend of the Aspen Institute Germany, The past year marked a very special occasion for the Aspen Institute Germany as it celebrated its 40th an- niversary. Founded in 1974 in the midst of the Cold War, the Institute was envisioned as a bulwark against dicta- torship and a symbol of freedom in the divided city of Berlin. Under the charismatic leadership of its first di- rector Shepard Stone, the Institute established a unique track record of building German-U.S. cooperation and dialog with the former Soviet Union. Ever since, it has been continuing this tradition of building bridges be- tween East and West and enabling constructive dialog amongst conflicting parties, promoting Euro-Atlantic co- operation, and enhancing a strong open society. To highlight the accomplishments of these four decades, Aspen Germany hosted its first Berlin Transatlantic Forum in October 2014, dedicated to opening new per- spectives for the Transatlantic partnership and for the fu- ture of European-American relations. The one-and-a-half day gathering brought together opinion leaders and high level decision-makers from the United States, Germany, and other European countries to advance the Euro-At- lantic agenda. The 40th anniversary was also the perfect occasion to introduce the newly endowed Shepard Stone Award for Outstanding Transatlantic Leadership in honor of the extraordinary achievements of Aspen Germany’s founder. The first recipient of the award was the pub- lisher and CEO of Springer Verlag, Dr. Mathias Döpfner. The anniversary celebration was perceived as a huge suc- cess and has been a wonderful encouragement on our path to innovate and expand the Institute’s programming. The Transatlantic Forum will continue to be an annual Aspen Germany landmark conference to provide a highly visible platform to address the most pressing challenges jointly facing Europe and the United States. Each fall, we will gather renowned experts and decision-makers Annual Report ASPEN INSTITUTE 2013/2014 GERMANY 4 from both sides of the Atlantic to foster the exchange of Board of Trustees has invited me in summer 2013 to as- ideas and search for answers to important questions in sume the Institute’s leadership and become its first Ger- the fields of security, energy, and trade, and in regard to man Executive Director. As a longtime former U.S. our shared foundation of Western values. correspondent for Deutsche Welle and founder of the German American Heritage Museum in Washington DC, Launching the Berlin Transatlantic Forum was not the it is my personal belief that Germany, Europe, and the only change in 2014. We also introduced the so-called United States of America need each other, probably more Brown Bag Luncheons. This format, commonly used in than ever before. American think tanks, takes place every two months and gathers experts, Aspen members, and guests from poli- I would like to take this opportunity and sincerely thank tics, business, and civil society during their lunch break everybody on the Aspen team, without whose extraordi- for an off-the-record exchange on pressing issues. In ad- nary and admirable engagement our significant achieve- dition, we expanded our “Public Program” in 2013/14 ments despite many obstacles would not have been and hosted a total of 20 events including engaged con- possible. I also like to express my deepest gratitude to versations and in-depth discussion at the China Club and our partners, sponsors, donors, and everyone who sup- other venues. Numerous of these events were broad- ported our work. We would not be where we are today casted by Deutschland Radio Kultur. without your continued commitment and encouragement. The Institute’s renowned Southeast Europe Program, Together, we will continue working successfully toward which dates back to the early nineties and promotes the our common goal of strengthening the Transatlantic part- Euro-Atlantic integration of the Western Balkans and nership, promoting values-based leadership, and actively fosters regional cooperation and dialog between the enhance the freedom of our open societies. countries, was continued in 2013/2014. It was a special endorsement of the program, when in November 2014 Sincerely, German Foreign Minister Dr. Frank-Walter Steinmeier and his British counterpart Philip Hammond served as the patrons of the foreign ministers’ conference of all Western Balkan countries, and used the event, organized and moderated by Aspen Germany, to announce a joint German-British initiative to revitalize the reform process in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Rüdiger Lentz Executive Director Our Aspen Leadership Seminar has grown in numbers Aspen Institute Deutschland e.V. and since its introduction in 2011 earned a reputation in its own right. In addition, it has proven to be an indis- pensable backbone of the Aspen network. For me, it has been a great pleasure and honor to be part of this vibrant and dynamic institution, ever since the ASPEN INSTITUTE Annual Report 5 GERMANY 2013/2014 CONTENT MISSION 09 BENEFACTORS 19 TRUSTEES 25 MANAGEMENT BOARD 37 FRIENDS OF ASPEN GERMANY 39 LEADERSHIP PROGRAM 43 The Aspen Leadership Seminar 43 POLICY PROGRAM 46 Aspen Southeast Europe Working Group 46 Sixth Southeast Europe Foreign Ministers’ Conference 46 Bundestag and Congress Staffers Exchange Program 47 Rule of Law Enhancement in the Western Balkans: Identifying the Next Steps 47 Roundtable Discussion with journalists from the Western Balkans 48 Security Concepts and Conflict Management: The Roles of NATO, the UN, and the EU 48 Economic Development in the Western Balkans: On the Road to Competitive Market Economies? 49 NATO’s Role for Europe’s Security 49 Aspen Working Group Southeast Europe 50 German-Israeli Strategic Dialog 50 Maritime Security and Europe 51 Energy Security as a Security Challenge in Southeast Europe? 51 Organized Crime as a Security Challenge in Southeast Europe 52 PUBLIC PROGRAM 55 Dr. Sharon T. Freeman 55 40 Years Aspen Germany Celebration: “Partners in Leadership” 56 Berlin Transatlantic Conference 56 Steffi Lemke, Christian Lindner, and Lars Zimmermann 57 Thomas Miller & Malte Lehming 57 Robert Hunter 58 Ed Geoas, Chris Israel, David Metzner, and Peter Beyer 58 Summer Party 2014 61 Annual Report ASPEN INSTITUTE 2013/2014 GERMANY 6 Prof. Lawrence Chalmer 61 Henryk M. Broder 62 Tara Sonenshine 62 Jackson Janes, Sofia Onufriv, Ewald Böhlke, and Pavlo Klimkin 63 Shi Ming 63 Dr. Sandro Gaycken and Arne Schönbohm 64 Dimitrios Droutsas and Peter Lange 64 Wolfgang Grupp 65 Egon Ramms 65 Niels Annen, Philipp Mißfelder, and John B. Emerson 66 Haifa Al Kaylani 66 Foreign Correspondents Panel 67 Summer Party 67 H.E. Takeshi Nakane 68 Dr. Jürgen Stark 68 KEY STAFF 71 PROGRAM 2015 73 FIVE REASONS TO SUPPORT ASPEN 76 Norbert Röttgen, Member of the German Bundestag and Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs Elmar Brok, Member of the European Parliament and Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ASPEN INSTITUTE Annual Report 9 GERMANY 2013/2014 MISSION THE ASPEN IDEA To fulfill its mission, Aspen Germany convenes decision- makers and experts from the fields of politics, business, THE ASPEN INSTITUTE GERMANY PRO- academia, media, culture, and civil society in three pro- MOTES VALUES-BASED LEADERSHIP, CON- grams: STRUCTIVE DIALOG AMONG CONFLICTING PARTIES, AND EURO-ATLANTIC COOPERA- Policy Programs offer a non-partisan, confidential TION TO SUPPORT AND ENHANCE A platform for dialog and analysis to address regional and STRONG OPEN SOCIETY. global challenges and to develop mutually acceptable so- lutions. Leadership Programs reflect on values and ideas using the Socratic method to deepen knowledge, broaden perspectives, and enhance participants’ ability to solve the problems they face. Public Programs provide a forum for open and con- structive dialog between decision-makers and a broader audience on a wide range of current issues. The Aspen Institute Germany was founded in Berlin in 1974 and has since then actively promoted the idea of transatlantic community and of a free and open society. It serves as a non-partisan, non-profit convening plat- form and is part of the global Aspen network, with part- ners in the U.S., France, Italy, the Czech Republic, Romania, Spain, Japan, India, and Mexico. Together, the Institutes are committed to addressing the challenges of the 21st century. Annual Report ASPEN INSTITUTE 2013/2014 GERMANY 10 The Aspen Idea goes back to 1945 when Chicago busi- The Institute is based in Washington, D.C. and has nessman and philanthropist Walter Paepcke (1896-1960), campuses in Aspen, Colorado, and on the Wye River on son of German immigrants from Mecklenburg, arrived in Maryland’s Eastern Shore. It also maintains offices in New Aspen, a then sleepy town in the mountains of Colorado. York City and has an international network of partners in Under the impression of the human and moral catastrophe Germany, France, Italy, the Czech Republic, Romania, of World War II, Paepcke dreamed of “a place where the Spain, Japan, India, and Mexico. human spirit can flourish.” As the first Institute abroad, Aspen Germany was founded Paepcke was a trustee of the University of Chicago and in 1974 in the midst of the Cold War.
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2019 Contents
    Annual Report 2019 Contents 4 Foreword 93 Report of the Supervisory Board 6 Executive Board 102 Consolidated Financial Statements 103 Consolidated Statement of 8 The Axel Springer share Financial Position 10 Combined Management Report 105 Consolidated Income Statement 106 Consolidated Statement of 13 Fundamentals of the Axel Springer Group Comprehensive Income 24 Economic Report 107 Consolidated Statement of 44 Economic Position of Axel Springer SE Cash Flows 48 Report on risks and opportunities 108 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 60 Forecast Report 109 Consolidated Segment Report 71 Disclosures and explanatory report on the Executive Board pursuant to takeover law 110 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 77 Corporate Governance Report 180 Responsibility Statement 181 Independent Auditor’s Report 187 Boards 2 Group Key Figures in € millions Change yoy 2019 2018 Group Revenues – 2.2 % 3,112.1 3,180.7 Digital revenue share1) 73.3 % 70.6 % 2) EBITDA, adjusted – 14.5 % 630.6 737.9 EBITDA margin, adjusted2) 20.3 % 23.2 % 2) EBIT, adjusted – 21.5 % 414.5 527.9 EBIT margin, adjusted 2) 13.3 % 16.6 % Net income – 35.4 % 134.6 208.4 2) Net income, adjusted – 21.5 % 263.7 335.7 Segments Revenues Classifieds Media 0.1 % 1,213.8 1,212.5 News Media – 4.4 % 1,430.9 1,496.2 Marketing Media 0.8 % 421.5 418.3 Services/Holding – 14.4 % 46.0 53.7 EBITDA, adjusted2) Classifieds Media – 3.8 % 468.4 487.2 News Media – 39.3 % 138.5 228.2 Marketing Media 20.3 % 107.8 89.6 Services/Holding − – 84.1 – 67.0 EBIT, adjusted2) Classifieds Media – 7.1 % 377.9 406.7 News Media – 54.4 % 72.1 158.2 Marketing Media 26.1 % 83.3 66.0 Services/Holding − – 118.6 – 103.0 Liquidity and financial position 2) Free cash flow (FCF) – 38.1 % 214.6 346.9 2) 3) FCF excl.
    [Show full text]
  • BT Drs. 19/17750
    Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 19/17750 19. Wahlperiode 10.03.2020 Vorabfassung Antrag der Abgeordneten Renate Künast, Dr. Irene Mihalic, Dr. Konstantin von Notz, Tabea Rößner, Luise Amtsberg, Canan Bayram, Katja Dörner, Erhard Grundl, Britta Haßelmann, Katja Keul, Monika Lazar, Steffi Lemke, Cem Özdemir, Filiz Polat, Claudia Roth, Dr. Manuela Rottmann, Ulle Schauws, Charlotte Schneidewind- Hartnagel, Kordula Schulz-Asche, Margit Stumpp, Beate Walter-Rosenheimer und der Fraktion BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN - wird Hass und Hetze wirksam bekämpfen, Betroffene stärken und Bürgerrechte schützen durch Der Bundestag wolle beschließen: I. Der Deutsche Bundestag stellt fest: die Zur wirksamen Bekämpfung von Rechtsextremismus, der Bedrohung ganzer Be- völkerungsgruppen sowie von Hass und Hetze im Netz bedarf es einer koordinier- ten Gesamtstrategie, die das Problemfeld auf seinen sämtlichen Ebenen bearbei- lektorierte tet: als rechtsextreme Strategie zur Aushöhlung der Demokratie, als gesamtgesell- schaftliches Phänomen einer Verrohung der Debattenkultur und als Fortsetzung wie Befeuerung analoger Formen von Diskriminierung und Gewalt. Rassistischer, antisemitischer, antiziganistischer, muslimfeindlicher, völkischer, antifeministischer, homo- und transfeindlicher Propaganda und Agitation muss mit aller Entschlossenheit begegnet werden. Menschenverachtenden Ideologien der Ungleichwertigkeit muss entschieden widersprochen und der Strategie einer Normalisierung des vormals Unsagbaren entschlossen begegnet werden. Die dem Gesetzentwurf der Bundesregierung
    [Show full text]
  • Monitor Electoral
    ANGELA MERKEL SE PREPARA PARA SU CUARTO MANDATO COMO CANCILLER FEDERAL: CONFORMACIÓN Y DESAFÍOS DE LA NUEVA GRAN COALICIÓN EN ALEMANIA 7 DE MARZO DE 2018 MONITOR ELECTORAL Fuente: Diario El País. ANÁLISIS E INVESTIGACIÓN El 4 de marzo, las bases socialdemócratas alemanas dieron el “Sí” a la coalición de Gobierno con los conservadores. Desde el 24 de septiembre de 2017, cuando tuvieron lugar las elecciones generales, hasta esta fecha, habrán transcurrido más de cinco meses para que la Canciller Angela Merkel pudiera formar gobierno. En el camino de las negociaciones, las dificultades y obstáculos fueron muchos y provinieron de las reticencias de los principales partidos que dominan el escenario político en Alemania. Un primer intento fallido fue el de la conformación de la así denominada Coalición Jamaica, que dio paso al tránsito hacia una fórmula que en buena medida repite la coalición de 2013 entre conservadores y socialdemócratas. El proceso no sólo ha dejado un desgaste relevante en el liderazgo e influencia de los líderes de los partidos y desde luego en la imagen de la propia Canciller Federal. También ha hecho lo propio con Martín Schulz, quien fracasó en su objetivo de asumir la cartera de Asuntos Exteriores. Pareciera, en este sentido, que la Gran Coalición es un mayor acierto para Europa, que para distintos actores en el ámbito nacional. El bloque comunitario ansiaba la conclusión de las negociaciones para poner en marcha el eje París-Berlín y así dar forma a un ambicioso proyecto para renovar la Unión. Pero, al interior del país existe el temor de que en el largo plazo la Gran Coalición fortalezca a la extrema derecha, por lo que conservadores y socialdemócratas tendrán que buscar la forma de que estas fuerzas no les arrebaten más simpatías.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion: Europe Is Worth It – for a Green Recovery Rooted in Solidarity and A
    German Bundestag Printed paper 19/20564 19th electoral term 30 June 2020 version Preliminary Motion tabled by the Members of the Bundestag Agnieszka Brugger, Anja Hajduk, Dr Franziska Brantner, Sven-Christian Kindler, Dr Frithjof Schmidt, Margarete Bause, Kai Gehring, Uwe Kekeritz, Katja Keul, Dr Tobias Lindner, Omid Nouripour, Cem Özdemir, Claudia Roth, Manuel Sarrazin, Jürgen Trittin, Ottmar von Holtz, Luise Amtsberg, Lisa Badum, Danyal Bayaz, Ekin Deligöz, Katja Dörner, Katharina Dröge, Britta Haßelmann, Steffi Lemke, Claudia Müller, Beate Müller-Gemmeke, Erhard Grundl, Dr Kirsten Kappert-Gonther, Maria Klein-Schmeink, Christian Kühn, Stephan Kühn, Stefan Schmidt, Dr Wolfgang Strengmann-Kuhn, Markus Tressel, Lisa Paus, Tabea Rößner, Corinna Rüffer, Margit Stumpp, Dr Konstantin von Notz, Dr Julia Verlinden, Beate Walter-Rosenheimer, Gerhard Zickenheiner and the Alliance 90/The Greens parliamentary group be to Europe is worth it – for a green recovery rooted in solidarity and a strong 2021- 2027 EU budget the by replaced The Bundestag is requested to adopt the following resolution: I. The German Bundestag notes: A strong European Union (EU) built on solidarity which protects its citizens and our livelihoods is the best investment we can make in our future. Our aim is an EU that also and especially proves its worth during these difficult times of the corona pandemic, that fosters democracy, prosperity, equality and health and that resolutely tackles the challenge of the century that is climate protection. We need an EU that bolsters international cooperation on the world stage and does not abandon the weakest on this earth. proofread This requires an EU capable of taking effective action both internally and externally, it requires greater solidarity on our continent and beyond - because no country can effectively combat the climate crisis on its own, no country can stamp out the pandemic on its own.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda 2010“ in Der SPD: Ein Beispiel Mangelnder Innerparteilicher Demokratie?
    Bamberger Beiträge zur Vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft Heft 2 Simon Preuß Der Willensbildungsprozess zur „Agenda 2010“ in der SPD: Ein Beispiel mangelnder innerparteilicher Demokratie? Überarbeitete und gekürzte Version der Diplomarbeit zum selben Thema Inhaltsverzeichnis I Einleitung .................................................................................................................................................- 1 - II Innerparteiliche Demokratie in der theoretischen Diskussion ............................................................- 9 - 1. Verschiedene Modelle innerparteilicher Demokratie.........................................................................- 10 - 2. Das Grundgesetz und das Parteiengesetz von 1967 ...........................................................................- 11 - 3. Michels „ehernes Gesetz der Oligarchie“..........................................................................................- 13 - 3.1. Ursachen der Oligarchisierung..................................................................................................- 13 - 3.2. Machtressourcen der Parteiführung...........................................................................................- 14 - 4. Neuere Arbeiten zur innerparteilichen Demokratie............................................................................- 15 - 5. Parteien als „lose verkoppelte Anarchien“?......................................................................................- 17 - 6. Neuere empirische Untersuchungen zu Machtressourcen
    [Show full text]
  • 14Annual Report Contents
    14Annual Report Contents 4 Foreword 78 Report of the Supervisory Board 6 Executive Board 86 Consolidated Financial Statements 87 Responsibility Statement 8 The Axel Springer share 88 Auditor’s Report 89 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 10 Combined Management Report 91 Consolidated Statement of 12 Fundamentals of the Axel Springer Group Comprehensive Income 22 Economic report 92 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 41 Economic position of Axel Springer SE 93 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 44 Events after the reporting date 94 Consolidated Segment Report 45 Report on risks and opportunities 95 Notes to the Consolidated 56 Forecast report Financial Statements 61 Disclosures and explanatory report of the Executive Board pursuant to takeover law 158 Boards 65 Corporate Governance Report Group Key Figures Continuing operations in € millions Change yoy 2014 2013 2012 Group Total revenues 8.4 % 3,037.9 2,801.4 2,737.3 Digital media revenues share 53.2 % 47.5 % 42.4 % 1) EBITDA 11.6 % 507.1 454.3 498.8 1) EBITDA margin 16.7 % 16.2 % 18.2 % 2) Digital media EBITDA share 72.1 % 62.0 % 49.4 % 3) EBIT 9.7 % 394.6 359.7 413.6 Consolidated net income 31.9 % 235.7 178.6 190.7 3) Consolidated net income, adjusted 9.3 % 251.2 229.8 258.6 Segments Revenues Paid Models 2.6 % 1,561.4 1,521.5 1,582.9 Marketing Models 10.8 % 794.1 716.5 662.8 Classified Ad Models 27.2 % 512.0 402.6 330.2 Services/Holding 6.1 % 170.5 160.8 161.4 EBITDA1) Paid Models – 2.4 % 244.2 250.1 301.8 Marketing Models 6.0 % 109.7 103.4 98.1 Classified Ad Models
    [Show full text]
  • Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 19/6961 11.01.2019 19
    Deutscher Bundestag Drucksache 19/6961 11.01.2019 19. Wahlperiode ersetzt. - wird durch die lektorierte Version Vorabfassung Schriftliche Fragen mit den in der Woche vom 7. Januar 2019 eingegangenen Antworten der Bundesregierung Verzeichnis der Fragenden Abgeordnete Nummer Abgeordnete Nummer der Frage der Frage Amtsberg, Luise (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) .... 54 Dehm, Diether, Dr. (DIE LINKE.) ................... 29, 100 Andreae, Kerstin Domscheit-Berg, Anke (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) ................................ 24 (DIE LINKE.) ...................................... 30, 31, 74, 117 Badum, Lisa Ernst, Klaus (DIE LINKE.) .............................. 75, 118 (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) ........................ 55, 126 Faber, Marcus, Dr. (FDP) ....................................... 101 Baerbock, Annalena (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) Fricke, Otto (FDP) .............................................. 92, 93 ................................................................................. 114 Frömming, Götz, Dr. (AfD) ..................................... 61 Barrientos, Simone (DIE LINKE.) ..................... 1, 2, 3 Gastel, Matthias Bause, Margarete (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) ............................. 119 (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) .................... 25, 56, 57 Hänsel, Heike (DIE LINKE.) ................................... 76 Bayaz, Danyal, Dr. (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) .... 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 Höferlin, Manuel (FDP) ..................................... 32, 33 Bayram, Canan Holm, Leif-Erik (AfD) ................................. 4, 5, 6, 34 (BÜNDNIS
    [Show full text]
  • Daimler-Benz AG Stuttgart Annual Report 1985
    Daimler-Benz Highlights Daimler-Benz AG Stuttgart Annual Report 1985 Page Agenda for the Stockholders' Meeting 5 Members of the Supervisory Board and the Board of Management 8 Report of The Board of Management 11 Business Review 11 Outlook 29 100 Years of The Automobile 35 Research and Development 59 Materials Management 64 Production 67 Sales 71 Employment 77 Subsidiaries and Affiliated Companies 84 Report of the Supervisory Board 107 Financial Statements of Daimler-Benz AG 99 Notes to Financial Statements of Daimler-Benz AG 100 Proposal for the Allocation of Unappropriated Surplus 106 Balance Sheet as at December 31,1985 108 Statement of Income ForThe Year Ended December 31,1985 110 Consolidated Financial Statements 111 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 112 Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31,1985 122 Consolidated Statement of Income For The Year Ended December 31,1985 124 Tables and Graphs 125 Daimler-Benz Highlights 126 Sales and Production Data 129 Automobile Industry Trends in Leading Countries 130 3 for the 90th Stockholders' Meeting being held on Wednesday, July 2,1986 at 10:00 a.m. in the Hanns-Martin-Schleyer-Halle in Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, MercedesstraBe. 1. Presentation of the audited financial statements as of 3. Ratification of the Board of December 31,1985, the reports of the Board of Manage­ Management's Actions. ment and the Supervisory Board together with the con­ Board of Management and solidated financial statements and the consolidated annual Supervisory Board propose report for the year 1985. ratification. 2. Resolution for the Disposition of the Unappropriated 4. Ratification of the Supervi­ Surplus.
    [Show full text]
  • Tageszeitung (Taz) Article on the Opening of the Berlin Wall
    Volume 10. One Germany in Europe, 1989 – 2009 The Fall of the Berlin Wall (November 9, 1989) Two journalists from Die Tageszeitung (taz), a left-of-center West Berlin newspaper, describe the excitement generated by the sudden opening of the Berlin Wall on November 9, 1989. The event was the result of internal pressure applied by East German citizens, and it evoked spontaneous celebration from a people who could once again freely cross the border and rekindle relationships with friends and relatives on the other side. (Please note: the dancing bear mentioned below is a figurative reference to West Berlin's official mascot. Beginning in 1954, the flag of West Berlin featured a red bear set against a white background. In 1990, the bear became the mascot of a unified Berlin. The former West Berlin flag now represents the city as a whole.) "We Want In!" The Bear Is Dancing on the Border Around midnight, RIAS – the American radio station broadcasting to the East – still has no traffic interruptions to report. Yet total chaos already reigns at the border checkpoint on Invalidenstrasse. People parked their cars at all conceivable angles, jumped out, and ran to the border. The transmission tower of the radio station "Free Berlin" is already engulfed by a throng of people (from the West) – waiting for the masses (from the East) to break through. After three seconds, even the most hardened taz editor finds himself applauding the first Trabi he sees. Everyone gets caught up in the frenzy, whether she wants to or not. Even the soberest members of the crowd are applauding, shrieking, gasping, giggling.
    [Show full text]
  • Entscheidungen Im August 2020 Und Ergebnisse Der 252. Sitzung Der KEK Zulassungen • Supreme Master TV / Supreme Master Ching Hai Deutschland E
    KEK-Pressemitteilung 04/2020 • Berlin, 8. September 2020 Entscheidungen im August 2020 und Ergebnisse der 252. Sitzung der KEK Zulassungen • Supreme Master TV / Supreme Master Ching Hai Deutschland e. V. • TVR (Arbeitstitel) / Deutsches Musik Fernsehen GmbH & Co. KG Beteiligungsveränderungen • TM-TV GmbH • ProSiebenSat.1 Media SE • RTL Group S.A. • German Car TV Programm GmbH und MV Sendebetriebs- gesellschaft UG (haftungsbeschränkt) • sporttotal.tv GmbH • WeltN24 GmbH und Bild GmbH Die Kommission zur Ermittlung der Konzentration im Medienbereich (KEK) hat entschieden, dass den folgenden Zulassungen und Beteiligungsveränderungen keine Gründe der Sicherung der Meinungsvielfalt entgegenstehen: Zulassung Supreme Master TV / Supreme Master Ching Hai Deutschland e. V. Der Supreme Master Ching Hai Deutschland e.V. hat bei der Medienanstalt Berlin-Brandenburg (mabb) eine Zulassung für das bundesweite Fernsehspartenprogramm Supreme Master TV beantragt. Das Programm Supreme Master TV ist geprägt vom Leben und Wirken der Ching Hai, einer vietnamesischen Schriftstellerin, Unternehmerin und Meditationslehrerin, die in ihrem Umfeld als spirituelle Meisterin gilt. Themenschwerpunkte sind unter anderem Veganismus, Frieden, Kultur, Spiritualität, Umwelt und Gesundheit. Supreme Master TV wird bereits international über verschiedene Ausspielwege verbreitet. In Deutschland ist der Empfang über die sendereigene Website www.suprememastertv.com und über YouTube, Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV sowie Android-Smart-TV-Systeme und TikTok möglich. 1/8 Zulassung TVR (Arbeitstitel) / Deutsches Musik Fernsehen GmbH & Co. KG Die Deutsches Musik Fernsehen GmbH & Co. KG plant ein Unterhaltungsspartenprogramm unter dem Arbeitstitel TVR. Das Programm soll frei empfangbar über Satellit (Astra) und Kabel (PŸUR/Tele Columbus) erfolgen. Ein entsprechender Zulassungsantrag wurde bei der Bremischen Landesmedienanstalt (brema) gestellt. Die Deutsches Musik Fernsehen GmbH & Co.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs
    The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project AMBASSADOR HARRY JOSEPH GILMORE Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: February 3, 2003 Copyright 2012 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born and raised in Pennsylvania Carnegie Institute of Technology (Carnegie Mellon University) University of Pittsburgh Indiana University Marriage Entered the Foreign Service in 1962 A,100 Course Ankara. Turkey/ 0otation Officer1Staff Aide 1962,1963 4upiter missiles Ambassador 0aymond Hare Ismet Inonu 4oint US Military Mission for Aid to Turkey (4USMAT) Turkish,US logistics Consul Elaine Smith Near East troubles Operations Cyprus US policy Embassy staff Consular issues Saudi isa laws Turkish,American Society Internal tra el State Department/ Foreign Ser ice Institute (FSI)7 Hungarian 1963,1968 9anguage training Budapest. Hungary/ Consular Officer 1968,1967 Cardinal Mindszenty 4anos Kadar regime 1 So iet Union presence 0elations Ambassador Martin Hillenbrand Israel Economy 9iberalization Arab,Israel 1967 War Anti,US demonstrations Go ernment restrictions Sur eillance and intimidation En ironment Contacts with Hungarians Communism Visa cases (pro ocations) Social Security recipients Austria1Hungary relations Hungary relations with neighbors 0eligion So iet Mindszenty concerns Dr. Ann 9askaris Elin OAShaughnessy State Department/ So iet and Eastern Europe EBchange Staff 1967,1969 Hungarian and Czech accounts Operations Scientists and Scholars eBchange programs Effects of Prague Spring 0elations
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Charlevoix G7 Final Compliance Report 10 June 2018 — 25 July 2019
    The G7 Research Group at the Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy at Trinity College in the University of Toronto presents the 2018 Charlevoix G7 Final Compliance Report 10 June 2018 — 25 July 2019 Prepared by Angela Min Yi Hou, Julia Tops, and Cindy Xinying Ou 23 August 2019 www.g7.utoronto.ca [email protected] @g7_rg “We have meanwhile set up a process and there are also independent institutions monitoring which objectives of our G7 meetings we actually achieve. When it comes to these goals we have a compliance rate of about 80%, according to the University of Toronto. Germany, with its 87%, comes off pretty well. That means that next year too, under the Japanese G7 presidency, we are going to check where we stand in comparison to what we have discussed with each other now. So a lot of what we have resolved to do here together is something that we are going to have to work very hard at over the next few months. But I think that it has become apparent that we, as the G7, want to assume responsibility far beyond the prosperity in our own countries. That’s why today’s outreach meetings, that is the meetings with our guests, were also of great importance.” Chancellor Angela Merkel, Schloss Elmau, 8 June 2015 G7 summits are a moment for people to judge whether aspirational intent is met by concrete commitments. The G7 Research Group provides a report card on the implementation of G7 and G20 commitments. It is a good moment for the public to interact with leaders and say, you took a leadership position on these issues — a year later,
    [Show full text]