Thermoregulation in Neo-Tropical Tree Frogs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Thermoregulation in Neo-Tropical Tree Frogs A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Master of Philosophy in the Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences Submitted on 2015 Francisco Herrerías Azcué School of Physics and Astronomy 1 2 List of Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................. 7 Abstract ........................................................................................................................ 11 Publications and Presentations ...................................................................................... 15 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................... 17 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 19 2 Thermoregulation .................................................................................................. 21 2.1 Absorbed radiation ................................................................................................. 22 2.2 Emitted radiation .................................................................................................... 22 2.3 Conduction .............................................................................................................. 23 2.4 Convection .............................................................................................................. 23 2.5 Evaporative water loss ............................................................................................ 24 2.6 Metabolism ............................................................................................................. 24 3 Parameters ............................................................................................................ 25 3.1 Environmental ......................................................................................................... 25 3.1.1 Solar Irradiance ............................................................................................... 26 3.1.2 Surrounding Temperature .............................................................................. 27 3.1.3 Wind ................................................................................................................ 27 3.1.4 Relative Humidity ............................................................................................ 27 3.1.5 Global Position and Time ................................................................................ 28 3.2 Frog-Dependant ...................................................................................................... 29 3.2.1 Shape ............................................................................................................... 29 3 3.2.2 Position / Projection ........................................................................................ 30 3.2.3 Frog Spectra ..................................................................................................... 31 3.2.4 Convection Coefficients ................................................................................... 32 3.3 Constants ................................................................................................................. 34 4 Photogrammetry.................................................................................................... 35 4.1 Software .................................................................................................................. 35 4.2 Method .................................................................................................................... 36 4.2.1 Image Acquisition ............................................................................................ 36 4.2.2 Model Reconstruction ..................................................................................... 38 4.2.3 Mesh scaling and cleaning ............................................................................... 39 4.3 Measurements ......................................................................................................... 40 4.4 Precision .................................................................................................................. 40 4.4.1 Printed 3D Models ........................................................................................... 40 4.4.1 Known Density Objects .................................................................................... 41 5 Frog Surface Areas ................................................................................................. 43 5.1 Acquired Data .......................................................................................................... 44 5.2 Interpolation from weight ....................................................................................... 44 5.3 Interpolation from snout-vent length ..................................................................... 45 5.4 Surface area comparison ......................................................................................... 46 6 Measuring the Mass Transfer Coefficient ................................................................ 49 6.1 Theoretical Background ........................................................................................... 49 6.2 Experimental Method .............................................................................................. 50 6.3 Models and Instrumentation ................................................................................... 51 6.3.1 Agar Models ..................................................................................................... 51 6.3.2 Agar Moulds for Plaster of Paris Models ......................................................... 52 6.3.3 Plaster of Paris Models .................................................................................... 52 6.3.4 Instrumentation ............................................................................................... 53 6.4 Results and Discussion ............................................................................................. 53 6.5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 56 7 Frog Simulator GUI ................................................................................................. 57 7.1 Solar Irradiance Model ............................................................................................ 57 4 7.1.1 Air Mass Approach .......................................................................................... 58 7.1.2 Solar Position Calculator ................................................................................. 58 7.1.3 SMARTS Approach .......................................................................................... 59 7.2 GUI Inputs and Functionality .................................................................................. 60 7.2.1 Frog Characteristics ......................................................................................... 60 7.2.2 Ambient Characteristics .................................................................................. 63 7.2.3 Location Characteristics .................................................................................. 64 7.3 Outputs ................................................................................................................... 64 7.4 Save and Load ......................................................................................................... 65 8 Simulation Results.................................................................................................. 67 8.1 Extreme Case Scenario ............................................................................................ 67 8.2 Partially Occluded Frog ........................................................................................... 69 9 Conclusions ............................................................................................................ 73 Appendix A, Frog Simulator Code ................................................................................... 76 Appendix B, Solar Position Code .................................................................................. 114 Appendix C, Solar Spectrum Code ................................................................................ 116 References .................................................................................................................. 137 Final word count: 33,458 5 6 List of Figures Figure 1.1 Photographs of Cruziohyla craspedopus (Top) and Cruziohyla calcarifer (Bottom), on which the surface area studies were focused. ...................................................................... 20 Figure 2.1 Diagram of the power exchange processes considered in the thermoregulation model. Absorption of solar radiation considers scattered, reflected direct and indirect sunlight, and it can only have a positive sign (going into the frog). Conduction and grey body radiation and convection can take either sign, and although evaporative water loss could too, it usually has a negative sign. ..................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 3.1 Samples of the solar direct (red) and diffuse (blue) spectra at different zenith angles.
Recommended publications
  • Contents Herpetological Journal

    Contents Herpetological Journal

    British Herpetological Society Herpetological Journal Volume 31, Number 3, 2021 Contents Full papers Killing them softly: a review on snake translocation and an Australian case study 118-131 Jari Cornelis, Tom Parkin & Philip W. Bateman Potential distribution of the endemic Short-tailed ground agama Calotes minor (Hardwicke & Gray, 132-141 1827) in drylands of the Indian sub-continent Ashish Kumar Jangid, Gandla Chethan Kumar, Chandra Prakash Singh & Monika Böhm Repeated use of high risk nesting areas in the European whip snake, Hierophis viridiflavus 142-150 Xavier Bonnet, Jean-Marie Ballouard, Gopal Billy & Roger Meek The Herpetological Journal is published quarterly by Reproductive characteristics, diet composition and fat reserves of nose-horned vipers (Vipera 151-161 the British Herpetological Society and is issued free to ammodytes) members. Articles are listed in Current Awareness in Marko Anđelković, Sonja Nikolić & Ljiljana Tomović Biological Sciences, Current Contents, Science Citation Index and Zoological Record. Applications to purchase New evidence for distinctiveness of the island-endemic Príncipe giant tree frog (Arthroleptidae: 162-169 copies and/or for details of membership should be made Leptopelis palmatus) to the Hon. Secretary, British Herpetological Society, The Kyle E. Jaynes, Edward A. Myers, Robert C. Drewes & Rayna C. Bell Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK. Instructions to authors are printed inside the Description of the tadpole of Cruziohyla calcarifer (Boulenger, 1902) (Amphibia, Anura, 170-176 back cover. All contributions should be addressed to the Phyllomedusidae) Scientific Editor. Andrew R. Gray, Konstantin Taupp, Loic Denès, Franziska Elsner-Gearing & David Bewick A new species of Bent-toed gecko (Squamata: Gekkonidae: Cyrtodactylus Gray, 1827) from the Garo 177-196 Hills, Meghalaya State, north-east India, and discussion of morphological variation for C.
  • Phylogenetics, Classification, and Biogeography of the Treefrogs (Amphibia: Anura: Arboranae)

    Phylogenetics, Classification, and Biogeography of the Treefrogs (Amphibia: Anura: Arboranae)

    Zootaxa 4104 (1): 001–109 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4104.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D598E724-C9E4-4BBA-B25D-511300A47B1D ZOOTAXA 4104 Phylogenetics, classification, and biogeography of the treefrogs (Amphibia: Anura: Arboranae) WILLIAM E. DUELLMAN1,3, ANGELA B. MARION2 & S. BLAIR HEDGES2 1Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, 1345 Jayhawk Blvd., Lawrence, Kansas 66045-7593, USA 2Center for Biodiversity, Temple University, 1925 N 12th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122-1601, USA 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by M. Vences: 27 Oct. 2015; published: 19 Apr. 2016 WILLIAM E. DUELLMAN, ANGELA B. MARION & S. BLAIR HEDGES Phylogenetics, Classification, and Biogeography of the Treefrogs (Amphibia: Anura: Arboranae) (Zootaxa 4104) 109 pp.; 30 cm. 19 April 2016 ISBN 978-1-77557-937-3 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77557-938-0 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2016 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/j/zt © 2016 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use.
  • Cruziohyla (Anura: Phyllomedusidae), with Description of a New Species

    Cruziohyla (Anura: Phyllomedusidae), with Description of a New Species

    Zootaxa 4450 (4): 401–426 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2018 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4450.4.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:54B89172-7983-40EB-89E9-6964A4D4D5AC Review of the genus Cruziohyla (Anura: Phyllomedusidae), with description of a new species ANDREW R. GRAY The Manchester Museum, The University of Manchester, England. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The presented work summarises new and existing phenotypic and phylogenetic information for the genus Cruziohyla. Data based on morphology and skin peptide profiling supports the identification of a separate new species. Specimens of Cruziohyla calcarifer (Boulenger, 1902) occurring in Ecuador, Colombia, two localities in Panama, and one in the south east Atlantic lowlands of Costa Rica, distinctly differ from those occurring along the Atlantic versant of Central America from Panama northwards through Costa Rica, Nicaragua, to Honduras. A new species—Cruziohyla sylviae sp. n.—(the type locality: Alto Colorado in Costa Rica)—is diagnosed and described using an integrated approach from morphological and molecular data. Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences of the 16S rRNA gene confirms the new species having equal minimum 6.2% genetic divergence from both true C. calcarifer and Cruziohyla craspedopus. Key words: Amphibia, Variation, Taxonomy, Cruziohyla, northern South America, Central America, Middle America, Cruziohyla calcarifer, Cruziohyla
  • Amphibian Ark News

    Amphibian Ark News

    Number 15, June 2011 The Amphibian Ark team is pleased to send you the latest edition of our e- newsletter. We hope you enjoy reading it. Amphibian Ark photography contest winners announced! The Amphibian Ark Amphibian Ark photography contest winners Pre-order your 2012 AArk announced! calendars now! What an amazing response to our amphibian photography competition! And the winners are.... AArk 2011 Seed Grant Read More >> winners Pre-order your 2012 AArk calendars now! Wouldn't you like to be an The twelve winning photos from our international amphibian photography AArk Sustaining Donor too? competition have now been made into a beautiful calendar for 2012. You can order your calendars now! Conservation Needs Read More >> Assessment workshop for Caribbean amphibians AArk 2011 Seed Grant winners New AArk brochure and Amphibian Ark is pleased to announce the winners of the 2011 Seed Grant booklet program. These $5,000 competitive grants are designed to fund small start-up projects that are in need of seed money in order to build successful long-term programs that attract larger funding. New Frog MatchMaker Read More >> projects Launch of the Global Wouldn't you like to be an AArk Sustaining Donor too? Amphibian Blitz In 2009, three institutions pledged to donate their current amount of general operating support to the Amphibian Ark each year through 2013. We’re asking other zoos, aquariums and other facilities to follow their lead and become AArk Frog vets on the go! Sustaining Donors. Amphibian Veterinary Outreach Program continues Read More >> work in Ecuador Conservation Needs Assessment workshop for Conservation and breeding of Caribbean amphibians the Japanese Giant In March 2011, Amphibian AArk staff facilitated two Amphibian Conservation Needs Salamander at Asa Zoo Assessment workshops in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, in the Caribbean.
  • Frog S Observer Cards L.Org Frogs Body Size and Shape a Na to My Frogs Body Color and Pattern a Na to My

    Frog S Observer Cards L.Org Frogs Body Size and Shape a Na to My Frogs Body Color and Pattern a Na to My

    Observer Cards Observing Frogs EOL Observer Cards Fr Amphibians are a unique group of vertebrates that are distributed og across the globe. Sadly, nearly one-third of the world’s over 7,400 species are threatened. Frogs are the most speciose of three orders of amphibians, which also includes salamanders and worm-like s caecilians. Use these cards to help you focus on the key traits and behaviors that make different frogs species unique. Drawings, photographs, and recordings of frog calls are a great way to supple- ment your field notes as you explore the diversity of these amazing animals. Find out what species are in your area before you go looking www. for frogs by searching online or using a field guide for the state or country where you live. About Observer Cards Each set of observer cards provides information about key traits and techniques necessary to make accurate and useful scientific observations. The tool is not eo designed to identify species, but rather to encourage detailed observations. Take a journal or notebook along with you on your next nature walk and use these cards to guide your explorations. l. Image: Cryptothylax greshoffii, © B. Zimkus. org Breda Zimkus, PhD, MCZ, Harvard University Author: Breda Zimkus. Editor: Jeff Holmes & Tracy Barbaro, EOL, Harvard University. Edited by Tracy Barbaro, MA & Jeff Holmes, PhD Created by the Encyclopedia of Life - www.eol.org Supported by the Encyclopedia of Life Content Licensed Under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share-alike 3.0 License. Body Size and Shape Body Size and Shape EOL Observer Cards Frogs Make observations regarding the general body shape and record the 1 3 total body length.
  • Revista Nicaraguense De Biodiversidad

    Revista Nicaraguense De Biodiversidad

    ISSN 2413-337X REVISTA NICARAGUENSE DE BIODIVERSIDAD N°52. Noviembre 2019 Comments and updates to “Guía Ilustrada de Anfibios y Reptiles de Nicaragua” along with taxonomic and related suggestions associated with the herpetofauna of Nicaragua James R. McCranie, Javier Sunyer & José G. Martínez Fonseca PUBLICACIÓN DEL MUSEO ENTOMOLÓGICO ASOCIACIÓN NICARAGÜENSE DE ENTOMOLOGÍA LEON - - - NICARAGUA REVISTA NICARAGUENSE DE BIODIVERSIDAD. No.52. 2019. La Revista Nicaragüense de Biodiversidad (ISSN 2413-337X) es una publicación que pretende apoyar a la divulgación de los trabajos realizados en Nicaragua en este tema. Todos los artículos que en ella se publican son sometidos a un sistema de doble arbitraje por especialistas en el tema. The Revista Nicaragüense de Biodiversidad (ISSN 2413-337X) is a journal created to help a better divulgation of the research in this field in Nicaragua. Two independent specialists referee all published papers. Consejo Editorial Jean Michel Maes Editor General Museo Entomológico Nicaragua Milton Salazar Eric P. van den Berghe Herpetonica, Nicaragua ZAMORANO, Honduras Editor para Herpetología. Editor para Peces. Liliana Chavarría Arnulfo Medina ALAS, El Jaguar Nicaragua Editor para Aves. Editor para Mamíferos. Oliver Komar Estela Yamileth Aguilar ZAMORANO, Honduras Álvarez Editor para Ecología. ZAMORANO, Honduras Editor para Biotecnología. Indiana Coronado Missouri Botanical Garden/ Herbario HULE-UNAN León Editor para Botánica. Foto de Portada: Agalychnis callidryas: El Crucero, Managua, Nicaragua (Foto J. G. Martínez-Fonseca). _____________________________________ ( 2) _________________________________________ REVISTA NICARAGUENSE DE BIODIVERSIDAD. No.52. 2019. Comments and updates to “Guía Ilustrada de Anfibios y Reptiles de Nicaragua” along with taxonomic and related suggestions associated with the herpetofauna of Nicaragua James R. McCranie1, Javier Sunyer2,3, and José G.
  • For Immediate Release

    For Immediate Release

    For immediate release: Spectacular frog identified as new species One of the world’s most spectacular frogs has been identified as a new species after 20 years of painstaking research at The University of Manchester. Amphibian conservationist Andrew Gray, Curator of Herpetology at Manchester Museum, has named the creature Sylvia’s Tree Frog, Cruziohyla sylviae, after his 3-year-old granddaughter. The large colourful tree frog has remained under the radar of zoologists for almost 100 years. Sylvia’s Tree Frog, Cruziohyla sylviae, was originally collected in Panama in 1925 but has remained confused with the Splendid Tree Frog, Cruziohyla calcarifer, ever since. The discovery has highlighted that the original Splendid Tree Frog, first collected in 1902, remains much rarer than anyone ever realized and could face complete extinction in the near future. Less than 50 specimens are known of that species and less than 150 specimens of Sylvia’s Tree Frog are recorded. Gray officially describes the frog as a separate species in the top zoological journal, Zootaxa. He has worked extensively with this unusual group of frogs from Central and South America, both in the wild and in the live amphibian collection at Manchester Museum. Genetic and biochemical work carried out at The University of Manchester’s Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health was instrumental in the findings. The scientist at the University combined the unique characteristics of the Central American frog with skin peptide profiling and a genetic assessment. And that, says Gray, clearly identified the distinctiveness of the new species, which is in fact more closely related to another unusual South American species than the original Splendid Tree Frog.
  • A Thesis Submitted to the Honors College in Partial Fulfillment of the Bachelors Degree with Honors in Natural Resources

    A Thesis Submitted to the Honors College in Partial Fulfillment of the Bachelors Degree with Honors in Natural Resources

    The Biogeography Of Diel Patterns In Herpetofauna Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors Runnion, Emily Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 27/09/2021 09:59:20 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/632848 THE BIOGEOGRAPHY OF DIEL PATTERNS IN HERPETOFAUNA By EMILY RUNNION _______________________________ A Thesis Submitted to The Honors College In Partial Fulfillment of the Bachelors degree With Honors in Natural Resources THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA MAY 2019 Approved by: _____________________________ Dr. John Wiens Ecology and Evolutionary Biology ABSTRACT Animal activity varies greatly during daylight and nighttime hours, with species ranging from strictly diurnal or nocturnal, to cathemeral or crepuscular. Which of these categories a species falls into may be determined by a variety of factors, including temperature, and biogeographic location. In this study I analyzed diel activity patterns at 13 sites distributed around the world, encompassing a total of 901 species of reptile and amphibians. I compared these activity patterns to the absolute latitudes of each site and modeled diel behavior as a function of distance from the equator. I found that latitude does correlate with the presence of nocturnal snake and lizard species. However, I did not find significant results correlating latitude to any other reptile or amphibian lineage. INTRODUCTION Cycles of light and darkness are important for the activity and behaviors of many organisms, both eukaryotic and prokaryotic (Johnson et al.
  • Cop15 Prop. 13

    Cop15 Prop. 13

    CoP15 Prop. 13 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________________ Fifteenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Doha (Qatar), 13-25 March 2010 CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS FOR AMENDMENT OF APPENDICES I AND II A. Proposal Inclusion of the genus Agalychnis in Appendix II in compliance with Article II, paragraph 2 (a), of the text of the Convention, and Resolution Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP14) Annex 2 a, paragraph B, for: Agalychnis callidryas (Cope, 1862) Agalychnis moreletii (Duméril, 1853) And in compliance with Article II, paragraph 2 (b), of the text of the Convention, and Resolution Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP14), Annex 2 b, paragraph A, for: Agalychnis annae (Duellmann, 1963) Agalychnis saltator (Taylor, 1955) Agalychnis spurrelli (Boulenger, 1913) B. Proponent Honduras and Mexico* C. Supporting statement 1. Taxonomy 1.1 Class: Amphibia 1.2 Order: Anura 1.3 Family: Hylidae, subfamily Phyllomedusinae 1.4 Genus, species or subspecies: Agalychnis annae (Duellmann, 1963) 1.5 Scientific synonyms: Phyllomedusa annae (Duellmann, 1963) 1.6 Common names: English: blue-sided tree/leaf frog; golden-eyed leaf frog French: rainette arboricole à côtes bleues Spanish: rana azul, rana/ranita de los cafetales; rana de café * The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CITES Secretariat or the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for the contents of the document rests exclusively with its author. CoP15 Prop.
  • Systematic Review of the Frog Family Hylidae, with Special Reference to Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis and Taxonomic Revision

    Systematic Review of the Frog Family Hylidae, with Special Reference to Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis and Taxonomic Revision

    SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE FROG FAMILY HYLIDAE, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO HYLINAE: PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS AND TAXONOMIC REVISION JULIAÂ N FAIVOVICH Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Herpetology), American Museum of Natural History Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology (E3B) Columbia University, New York, NY ([email protected]) CEÂ LIO F.B. HADDAD Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de BiocieÃncias, Unversidade Estadual Paulista, C.P. 199 13506-900 Rio Claro, SaÄo Paulo, Brazil ([email protected]) PAULO C.A. GARCIA Universidade de Mogi das Cruzes, AÂ rea de CieÃncias da SauÂde Curso de Biologia, Rua CaÃndido Xavier de Almeida e Souza 200 08780-911 Mogi das Cruzes, SaÄo Paulo, Brazil and Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de SaÄo Paulo, SaÄo Paulo, Brazil ([email protected]) DARREL R. FROST Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Herpetology), American Museum of Natural History ([email protected]) JONATHAN A. CAMPBELL Department of Biology, The University of Texas at Arlington Arlington, Texas 76019 ([email protected]) WARD C. WHEELER Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History ([email protected]) BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10024 Number 294, 240 pp., 16 ®gures, 2 tables, 5 appendices Issued June 24, 2005 Copyright q American Museum of Natural History 2005 ISSN 0003-0090 CONTENTS Abstract ....................................................................... 6 Resumo .......................................................................
  • Anfibios Y Reptiles De Nicaragua

    Anfibios Y Reptiles De Nicaragua

    LIBRO ROJO ANFIBIOS Y REPTILES DE NICARAGUA 2017 CONSERVACIÓN DE LA DIVERSIDAD BIOLÓGICA NICARAGUA LISTA ROJA - . REDACCIÓN Y EDICIÓN Silvia Robleto_Hernández CO-EDICIÓN Allan Gutiérrez Rodríguez REVISIÓN César Otero Ortuño COORDINADOR DE GRUPO César Otero Ortuño COORDINACIÓN Edwin Castro Rivera Raomir Manzanárez Carlos Ramiro Mejía ASISTENTE DE COORDINACIÓN Julio César Santos Zacha Gutiérrez Joselin Manzanárez DISEÑO DE PORTADAS Y MAPAS Allan Gutiérrez Rodríguez FOTOS DE PORTADA Cochranella granulosa, Oedipina koehleri, Cruziohyla calcarifer, Agalychnis callidryas (Javier Sunyer), Coleonyx mitratus, Crocodylus acutus (Allan Gutiérrez), Agkistrodon howardgloydi (José G. Martínez) FOTOS CONTRAPORTADA Oophaga pumilio, Bothriechis schlegelii, Leptophis ahaetulla (Javier Sunyer), Trachemys venusta, Thecadactylus rapicauda (Silvia Robleto), Lepidochelys olivacea (Lidice Jarquín) AUTORES Robleto Hernández, Silvia Bióloga Investigadora Candidata a MSc. Gestión Ambiental Sub-coordinadora de Amphibian Specialist Group (ASG) – Nicaragua Miembro de la Comisión de Supervivencia de Especies (SSC) - UICN Gutiérrez Rodríguez, Allan Biólogo Investigador Especialista en Sistema de Información Geográfica Coordinador de Amphibian Specialist Group (ASG) – Nicaragua Miembro de la Comisión de Supervivencia de Especies (SSC) -UICN Otero Ortuño, César Biólogo investigador MSc. en Gestión Ambiental Presidente Capitulo SMBC- Nicaragua González, Ernesto Yarinse Miembro SMBC Capítulo Nicaragua Miembro Herpetonica_ Herpetólogos de Nicaragua Miembro Amphibian Specialist Group (ASG) –Nicaragua Leets Rodríguez, Layo Herbario UNAN-Managua Miembro SMBC Capítulo Nicaragua López Guevara, Henry Herbario UNAN-Managua Miembro Amphibian Specialist Group (ASG) –Nicaragua Miembro Herpetonica_ Herpetólogos de Nicaragua Sunyer, Javier PhD. en Biología con especialidad en Herpetología Miembro HerpetoNica_ Herpetólogos de Nicaragua Miembro de la Comisión de Supervivencia de Especies (SSC) Miembro Amphibian, Viper y Anoline Lizards Specialist Groups – UICN Libro Rojo Anfibios y Reptiles de Nicaragua.
  • S1. Field Dataset

    S1. Field Dataset

    Supplementary Materials S1. Field dataset (Figure S1–S2, Table S1–S2): We surveyed nine amphibian assemblages across Costa Rica in both versants (Caribbean and Pacific) and at elevations ranging from sea level to 1385 m (Figure S1). All surveys were conducted during the months of June and July between 2016–2018, except the locality of Alto Lari, which was sampled in March 2015. In total, we screened for Bd from 267 amphibians from 33 species. A total of 19 (58%) of the sampled species tested positive for Bd (Table S1 and S2, Figure S2). The overall infection rate in the field dataset was 39%, however this value showed high heterogeneity among sites, with values ranging from 0% in Punta Bunco-Burica to 60% in Santa Elena Peninsula (Table S2, Figure S2). In addition, we did not detect signs of disease in any infected individuals during our study and quantified low levels of infection in most of our samples (Table S1). S2. Species assessment (Table S3–S4): We updated the last official list of amphibian species in Costa Rica published in 2011 [1] by consulting the Herpetological Database (“Herp Database”) of the Museo de Zoología at Universidad de Costa Rica (http://museo.biologia.ucr.ac.cr/) and taxonomists’ lists [2,3]. We also compiled a list of all the species that have been screened for Bd and the methods used for detection (histology or PCR). Our new list of amphibians in Costa Rica includes a total of 215 species grouped in three orders, 16 families, and 48 genera (Table S1). This represents and addition of 20 species (ten anurans, nine salamanders, and one caecilian).