DOCSLIB.ORG

Target 2019 ST

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Target 2019 ST 2 INDEX 1. Space Technology ............................................... 6 1.38 Juno Spacecraft ......................................................... 20 1.1 Types of Orbits ............................................................ 6 1.39 OSIRIS-REx ............................................................... 20 1.2 Types of Satellites ........................................................ 7 1.40 Orion Spacecraft ........................................................ 21 1.3 Launch Vehicles .......................................................... 7 1.41 Voyager 1 & Voyager 2 ............................................. 21 1.42 Dawn Mission ............................................................ 21 Indian Missions ........................................................ 10 1.43 Europa Clipper Mission............................................. 22 1.4 PSLV C-44/Kalamsat ................................................ 10 1.44 Lucy and Psyche ........................................................ 22 1.5 PSLV C-43/HysIS ...................................................... 10 1.45 Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) Mission .............. 22 1.6 HySIS ......................................................................... 11 1.46 CubeSat...................................................................... 23 1.7 PSLV C-42................................................................. 11 1.47 NICER ....................................................................... 23 1.8 PSLV C-41/IRNSS-1I................................................. 11 1.48 GOLD & ICON .......................................................... 23 1.9 PSLV-C40/Cartosat-2 ............................................... 11 1.49 IMAP ......................................................................... 23 1.10 Cartosat Series Satellite ............................................ 12 1.50 VISIONS – 2............................................................... 24 1.11 Other Notable missions of PSLV ............................... 12 1.51 Kilopower Project ...................................................... 24 1.12 GSAT – 31 ................................................................. 12 1.52 Asteroid Impact and Deflection Assessment Mission . 24 1.13 GSAT – 11 ................................................................. 12 1.53 TESS .......................................................................... 24 1.14 GSLV MK-III D2 / GSAT 29 ...................................... 13 1.54 TDRS-M ..................................................................... 24 1.15 Other Developmental & Experimental Flights of GSLV MK-III… ................................................................................. 13 1.55 EcAMSat Mission ...................................................... 24 1.16 GSLV F-11/GSAT -7A ............................................... 13 1.56 ICESat-2 and GRACE ................................................ 25 1.17 GSLV-F08/GSAT-6A ................................................. 13 1.57 GRACE FO ................................................................ 25 1.18 GSLV-F09 / GSAT-9.................................................. 13 1.58 OCO-3 Mission .......................................................... 25 1.19 INSAT-3DR ............................................................... 14 1.59 SUBSEA ..................................................................... 25 1.20 ExseedSAT – 1 ........................................................... 14 1.60 Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System .............. 25 Other Notable Missions ........................................... 14 1.61 Joint Polar Satellite System ....................................... 26 1.21 Gaganyaan ................................................................ 14 1.62 Cassini Space Craft ................................................... 26 1.22 Mission Venus ........................................................... 15 1.63 Rosetta ....................................................................... 26 1.23 Aditya-L1 Mission ..................................................... 15 Other Space Agencies .............................................. 26 1.24 AstroSat ..................................................................... 16 1.64 Gaia mission .............................................................. 26 1.25 Mars Orbiter Mission ................................................ 16 1.65 Belle II ....................................................................... 27 1.26 Chandrayaan ............................................................. 16 1.66 Aeolus Satellite .......................................................... 27 1.27 Chandrayaan-2 ......................................................... 17 1.67 Galileo ....................................................................... 27 1.28 NISAR ........................................................................ 17 1.68 BepiColombo mission ................................................ 27 Global Missions ........................................................ 17 1.69 ExoMars .................................................................... 27 NASA ......................................................................... 17 1.70 SENTINEL-5P ........................................................... 28 1.29 NASA Solar Probe ..................................................... 17 1.71 Tiangong-1 ................................................................ 28 1.30 FOXSI Mission .......................................................... 18 1.72 Queqiao ..................................................................... 28 1.31 Insight Mission .......................................................... 18 1.73 Chang’e 4 .................................................................. 29 1.32 Curiosity .................................................................... 18 1.74 HY-1C satellite .......................................................... 29 1.33 Opportunity Rover ..................................................... 19 1.75 Cargo Spacecraft and Lunar Palace ......................... 29 1.34 ASPIRE ..................................................................... 19 1.76 Quasi-Zenith Satellite System .................................... 29 1.35 MAVEN ..................................................................... 19 1.77 MINERVA-II1 ............................................................ 30 1.36 New Frontiers program ............................................. 19 1.78 Ibuki – 2 ..................................................................... 30 1.37 New Horizons ............................................................ 20 1.79 Kirameki -2 ................................................................ 30 1.80 Hope Mission ............................................................. 30 www.shankariasacademy.com || www.iasparliament.com 3 1.81 Israel Spacecraft ....................................................... 30 3.6 James Webb Telescope .............................................. 42 1.82 Venus Satellite ........................................................... 30 3.7 Kepler Telescope ....................................................... 42 1.83 Remove Debris Mission ............................................. 31 3.8 SPHEREx ................................................................... 42 1.84 Falcon Heavy ............................................................ 31 3.9 Giant Magellan Telescope ......................................... 42 2. Planetary Systems ............................................ 31 3.10 SPARCS telescope ..................................................... 42 2.1 Sun’s Atmosphere ...................................................... 31 3.11 Very Large Telescope ................................................ 43 2.2 Solar Cycles and Sun spots ....................................... 32 3.12 Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope ............................ 43 2.3 Presence of Water in the Moon ................................. 32 3.13 ARIES Telescope ........................................................ 43 2.4 Super Blood Wolf Moon ............................................ 32 3.14 X-Calibur Telescope .................................................. 43 2.5 Super Blood Blue Moon ............................................ 33 3.15 INO Project ............................................................... 43 2.6 Pink Moon ................................................................. 33 2.36 Green Propellants ...................................................... 44 2.7 Longest Lunar Eclipse of the Century ....................... 33 2.37 Indo-UN Small Satellites Programme ........................ 45 2.8 Kordylewski Clouds................................................... 33 3.16 Excitonium ................................................................. 45 2.9 Liquid Water Lake in Mars ....................................... 34 4. Defense .............................................................. 45 2.10 Definition of a Planet ................................................ 34 Artillery .................................................................... 45 2.11 Graveyard Orbits ...................................................... 34 4.1 Pinaka Mark I ............................................................ 45 2.12 Rogue Planet ............................................................. 35 4.2 Dhanush
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pecora 21/ISRSE 38 Organized Special Presentation (SP) Sessions When Submitting an Abstract for a Proposed Special Session, Please Include the Session ID (E.G
    Pecora 21/ISRSE 38 Organized Special Presentation (SP) Sessions When submitting an abstract for a proposed special session, please include the session ID (e.g. SP1, SP2) as a Keyword. SP1 Open Data Cube: A new data technology for enhancing the use of satellite data to address sustainable development goals Brian Killough, NASA The Open Data Cube (ODC), created and facilitated by the Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS), is an open source software architecture that allows analysis-ready satellite data to be packaged in "cubes" to minimize data preparation complexity and take advantage of modern computing for increased value and impact of Earth observation data. This session will summarize the ODC progress, discuss the advancements of country-based implementation and present the status of several new open source ODC applications and their potential to address society and the UN Sustainable Development Goals. SP2 An overview of the current Analysis Ready Data products, tools, applications and impacts Andreia Siqueira, Geoscience Australia Public and private agencies have been committed to address the big data challenge by producing Analysis Ready Data products (ARD) for their users. The ARD products are enabling users to get first hand satellite data that are ready to use for a wide range of applications, including time-series analysis and the way forward to multi-sensor interoperability. The Analysis Ready Data session has as its main objective to present the current state of knowledge on global efforts towards producing Analysis Ready Data (ARD). It is expected that topics across the maturity of ARD products, including validation and calibration, the overall CEOS Analysis Ready Data for Land (CARD4L) framework as well as the Product Family Specifications (PFS) and the Product Alignment Assessment process (PAA) will be presented and discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • India and China Space Programs: from Genesis of Space Technologies to Major Space Programs and What That Means for the Internati
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2009 India And China Space Programs: From Genesis Of Space Technologies To Major Space Programs And What That Means For The Internati Gaurav Bhola University of Central Florida Part of the Political Science Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Bhola, Gaurav, "India And China Space Programs: From Genesis Of Space Technologies To Major Space Programs And What That Means For The Internati" (2009). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 4109. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/4109 INDIA AND CHINA SPACE PROGRAMS: FROM GENESIS OF SPACE TECHNOLOGIES TO MAJOR SPACE PROGRAMS AND WHAT THAT MEANS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY by GAURAV BHOLA B.S. University of Central Florida, 1998 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Political Science in the College of Arts and Humanities at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Summer Term 2009 Major Professor: Roger Handberg © 2009 Gaurav Bhola ii ABSTRACT The Indian and Chinese space programs have evolved into technologically advanced vehicles of national prestige and international competition for developed nations. The programs continue to evolve with impetus that India and China will have the same space capabilities as the United States with in the coming years.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade Studies Towards an Australian Indigenous Space Launch System
    TRADE STUDIES TOWARDS AN AUSTRALIAN INDIGENOUS SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Engineering by Gordon P. Briggs B.Sc. (Hons), M.Sc. (Astron) School of Engineering and Information Technology, University College, University of New South Wales, Australian Defence Force Academy January 2010 Abstract During the project Apollo moon landings of the mid 1970s the United States of America was the pre-eminent space faring nation followed closely by only the USSR. Since that time many other nations have realised the potential of spaceflight not only for immediate financial gain in areas such as communications and earth observation but also in the strategic areas of scientific discovery, industrial development and national prestige. Australia on the other hand has resolutely refused to participate by instituting its own space program. Successive Australian governments have preferred to obtain any required space hardware or services by purchasing off-the-shelf from foreign suppliers. This policy or attitude is a matter of frustration to those sections of the Australian technical community who believe that the nation should be participating in space technology. In particular the provision of an indigenous launch vehicle that would guarantee the nation independent access to the space frontier. It would therefore appear that any launch vehicle development in Australia will be left to non- government organisations to at least define the requirements for such a vehicle and to initiate development of long-lead items for such a project. It is therefore the aim of this thesis to attempt to define some of the requirements for a nascent Australian indigenous launch vehicle system.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Spaceflight Plans of Russia, China and India
    Presentation to the ASEB Committee on NASA Technology Roadmaps Panel on Human Health and Surface Exploration June 1, 2011 by Marcia S. Smith Space and Technology Policy Group, LLC Russia Extensive experience in human spaceflight First animal in space (1957), first man in space (1961), first woman in space (1963), first spacewalk (1965), first space station (1971) Seven successful space stations (Salyut 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and Mir) before partnering in International Space Station (ISS) No people beyond low Earth orbit (LEO), however For earth orbit, continues to rely on Soyuz, first launched in 1967, but upgraded many times and is key to ISS operations Designed space shuttle, Buran, but launched only once in automated mode (no crew) in 1988 06-01-2011 2 Russia (2) Existing reliable launch vehicles Proton is largest: 21 tons to LEO; 5.5 tons to geostationary transfer orbit (GTO) Attempts to build Saturn V-equivalent in 1960s and 1970s failed (N1 failed four times in four attempts 1969-1972) Energiya booster in 1980s only flew twice (1987 with Polyus and 1988 with Buran). Abandoned for financial reasons. Was 100 tons to LEO; 18-20 tons to GTO; 32 tons to lunar trajectory. RD-170 engines for Energiya’s strap-ons live on today in other forms for Zenit, Atlas V, and Angara (under development) 06-01-2011 3 Russia (3) Robotic planetary space exploration mixed Excellent success at – Moon (Luna and Lunokhod series, plus Zond circumlunar flights) Venus (Venera series) Halley’s Comet (Vega 1 and 2—also Venus) Jinxed at Mars More than a dozen failures in 1960s - 1970s Partial success with Phobos 2 in 1988 (Phobos 1 failed) Mars 96 failed to leave Earth orbit Phobos-Grunt scheduled for later this year; designed as sample return from Phobos (includes Chinese orbiter) 06-01-2011 4 Russia (4) Grand statements over decades about sending people to the Moon and Mars, but never enough money to proceed.
    [Show full text]
  • FACT FILE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY.Indd
    www.iasscore.in IAS 2021 | SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY | CONTENTS Development in the field of Information Technology .......................... 1 f Basic Computer/IT Terms .............................................................................................................. 1 f Current Trends in Information Technology ................................................................................. 4 f Emerging Trends in Information Technology .............................................................................. 5 Life Sciences & Biotechnology .......................................................... 9 f Cells ................................................................................................................................................11 f Genetics .........................................................................................................................................16 f Mendel and his work, seven traits observed by Mendel .........................................................18 f Biotechnology ...............................................................................................................................21 Space Program Development-India and World ................................ 25 f Genesis of Indian Space Programme..........................................................................................25 f Major milestones in Indian Space Programme .........................................................................26 f Chandrayaan-2 ..............................................................................................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • Gao-21-306, Nasa
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Committees May 2021 NASA Assessments of Major Projects GAO-21-306 May 2021 NASA Assessments of Major Projects Highlights of GAO-21-306, a report to congressional committees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found This report provides a snapshot of how The National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) portfolio of major well NASA is planning and executing projects in the development stage of the acquisition process continues to its major projects, which are those with experience cost increases and schedule delays. This marks the fifth year in a row costs of over $250 million. NASA plans that cumulative cost and schedule performance deteriorated (see figure). The to invest at least $69 billion in its major cumulative cost growth is currently $9.6 billion, driven by nine projects; however, projects to continue exploring Earth $7.1 billion of this cost growth stems from two projects—the James Webb Space and the solar system. Telescope and the Space Launch System. These two projects account for about Congressional conferees included a half of the cumulative schedule delays. The portfolio also continues to grow, with provision for GAO to prepare status more projects expected to reach development in the next year. reports on selected large-scale NASA programs, projects, and activities. This Cumulative Cost and Schedule Performance for NASA’s Major Projects in Development is GAO’s 13th annual assessment. This report assesses (1) the cost and schedule performance of NASA’s major projects, including the effects of COVID-19; and (2) the development and maturity of technologies and progress in achieving design stability.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Launchers Between Commerce and Geopolitics
    The European Launchers between Commerce and Geopolitics Report 56 March 2016 Marco Aliberti Matteo Tugnoli Short title: ESPI Report 56 ISSN: 2218-0931 (print), 2076-6688 (online) Published in March 2016 Editor and publisher: European Space Policy Institute, ESPI Schwarzenbergplatz 6 • 1030 Vienna • Austria http://www.espi.or.at Tel. +43 1 7181118-0; Fax -99 Rights reserved – No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose with- out permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “Source: ESPI Report 56; March 2016. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. ESPI is not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, product liability or otherwise) whether they may be direct or indirect, special, inciden- tal or consequential, resulting from the information contained in this publication. Design: Panthera.cc ESPI Report 56 2 March 2016 The European Launchers between Commerce and Geopolitics Table of Contents Executive Summary 5 1. Introduction 10 1.1 Access to Space at the Nexus of Commerce and Geopolitics 10 1.2 Objectives of the Report 12 1.3 Methodology and Structure 12 2. Access to Space in Europe 14 2.1 European Launchers: from Political Autonomy to Market Dominance 14 2.1.1 The Quest for European Independent Access to Space 14 2.1.3 European Launchers: the Current Family 16 2.1.3 The Working System: Launcher Strategy, Development and Exploitation 19 2.2 Preparing for the Future: the 2014 ESA Ministerial Council 22 2.2.1 The Path to the Ministerial 22 2.2.2 A Look at Europe’s Future Launchers and Infrastructure 26 2.2.3 A Revolution in Governance 30 3.
    [Show full text]
  • SICSA Mars Project
    SICSA Mars Project Space Architecture Spring 2010 Jessica Corbett James Doehring Frank Eichstadt Michael Fehlinger Kristine Ferrone Loi Nguyen Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture, University of Houston College of Architecture Mission Statement: Student Project • Explore and define an architectural framework through which to study space architecture, space operations and mission planning, and functional relationships of systems, elements and people • Facilitate multi-disciplinary and cooperative study involving numerous students pursuing discrete aspects of the architecture Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture, University of Houston College of Architecture Mission Statement: Mars Architecture • Provide sustainable, scalable and expandable capability to access and operate throughout the Martian system • Enable human visitation and Earth-return from Martian system, including orbits, natural satellites and eventually to the surface • Enable recovery of Martian artifacts • Contribute to the continued evolution Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture, University of Houston College of Architecture Context of Mars Exploration Sasakawa International Center for Space Architecture, University of Houston College of Architecture Deployment Strategy • Earth Region – Incoming –Surface •Crew •Artifacts • Industry – Solar Orbit • Academia • Communication Satellites • Politics • Mars Region • Launch facilities – Approach –Orbital •Braking • LEO construction –Orbital • L4/L5 depot •OMV Ops • Departure trajectory
    [Show full text]
  • RISAT-1A Scatsat-1 Mission : Continuity for OSCAT Orbit : 720 Km; Inclination : 98.27 Deg; ECT : 18:00 Hrs Des
    3rd Feb 2016 User Interaction Meet-2016 O.V.RAGHAVA REDDY Project Director Scatsat-1,Oceansat 3/3A 1 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018 and Beyond High CARTO-2C CARTO-2D CARTO-3 (Mar ’ 18) Resolution (Apr’ 16) (Apr’ 17) CARTO-3A(Mar’ 19) MICROSAT Mapping CARTO-3B(Mar’ 20) Missions (Sept’ 17) CARTO-2E (Dec’ 17) Ocean and SCATSAT OCEANSAT-3/3A Atmosphere (June’ 16) July ‘18/Dec,’19 Observation Missions Resource RESO’SAT-2A HYSIS (Mar’ 19) Monitoring (Aug’ 16) RISAT-2A (Mar’20) (Land & NISAR (Dec’20) Water) & EMISAT / Other SPADEX RESO’SAT-3S/3SA missions (Nov ‘16) RESO’SAT-3/3A/3B Mx RISAT-1A Scatsat-1 Mission : Continuity for OSCAT Orbit : 720 km; Inclination : 98.27 deg; ECT : 18:00 hrs Des Payloads Ku Band Scatterometer Res:25x25 km; Swath:1400km Status: • Budget Approved on 7/4/2015 • OS-2 Scatterometer Anomaly Comm. Recommendation implemented. • Configuration Finalized. • Overall PDR (S/c & Gr. seg) – Completed • Cross patching aspects Addressed. • Realization of Flight Model Sub-systems in Progress. • No criticalities foreseen Remarks: • Discussions are being held to launch at 9-45 AM ECT and subsequently lock the spacecraft at 8.00AM within 6 months • Tanks availability • Testing of integrated payload for on-orbit temperature excursions, considering on-orbit experience of OSCAT Readiness for Shipment: June,2016 Cartosat-2E Mission Cartosat-2E : Continuity for Cartosat-2 Orbit : Orbit : 505 Km (PSS); ECT : 9.30AM Incl. : 97.43 deg Mass : 710 Kg Payloads : • 0.64m Resolution - Panchromatic camera • 2m Resolution - Multi-spectral camera with
    [Show full text]
  • INDIA JANUARY 2018 – June 2020
    SPACE RESEARCH IN INDIA JANUARY 2018 – June 2020 Presented to 43rd COSPAR Scientific Assembly, Sydney, Australia | Jan 28–Feb 4, 2021 SPACE RESEARCH IN INDIA January 2018 – June 2020 A Report of the Indian National Committee for Space Research (INCOSPAR) Indian National Science Academy (INSA) Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) For the 43rd COSPAR Scientific Assembly 28 January – 4 Febuary 2021 Sydney, Australia INDIAN SPACE RESEARCH ORGANISATION BENGALURU 2 Compiled and Edited by Mohammad Hasan Space Science Program Office ISRO HQ, Bengalure Enquiries to: Space Science Programme Office ISRO Headquarters Antariksh Bhavan, New BEL Road Bengaluru 560 231. Karnataka, India E-mail: [email protected] Cover Page Images: Upper: Colour composite picture of face-on spiral galaxy M 74 - from UVIT onboard AstroSat. Here blue colour represent image in far ultraviolet and green colour represent image in near ultraviolet.The spiral arms show the young stars that are copious emitters of ultraviolet light. Lower: Sarabhai crater as imaged by Terrain Mapping Camera-2 (TMC-2)onboard Chandrayaan-2 Orbiter.TMC-2 provides images (0.4μm to 0.85μm) at 5m spatial resolution 3 INDEX 4 FOREWORD PREFACE With great pleasure I introduce the report on Space Research in India, prepared for the 43rd COSPAR Scientific Assembly, 28 January – 4 February 2021, Sydney, Australia, by the Indian National Committee for Space Research (INCOSPAR), Indian National Science Academy (INSA), and Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO). The report gives an overview of the important accomplishments, achievements and research activities conducted in India in several areas of near- Earth space, Sun, Planetary science, and Astrophysics for the duration of two and half years (Jan 2018 – June 2020).
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Remote Sensing Satellites (IRS)
    Topic: Indian Remote Sensing Satellites (IRS) Course: Remote Sensing and GIS (CC-11) M.A. Geography (Sem.-3) By Dr. Md. Nazim Professor, Department of Geography Patna College, Patna University Lecture-5 Concept: India's remote sensing program was developed with the idea of applying space technologies for the benefit of human kind and the development of the country. The program involved the development of three principal capabilities. The first was to design, build and launch satellites to a sun synchronous orbit. The second was to establish and operate ground stations for spacecraft control, data transfer along with data processing and archival. The third was to use the data obtained for various applications on the ground. India demonstrated the ability of remote sensing for societal application by detecting coconut root-wilt disease from a helicopter mounted multispectral camera in 1970. This was followed by flying two experimental satellites, Bhaskara-1 in 1979 and Bhaskara-2 in 1981. These satellites carried optical and microwave payloads. India's remote sensing programme under the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) started off in 1988 with the IRS-1A, the first of the series of indigenous state-of-art operating remote sensing satellites, which was successfully launched into a polar sun-synchronous orbit on March 17, 1988 from the Soviet Cosmodrome at Baikonur. It has sensors like LISS-I which had a spatial resolution of 72.5 meters with a swath of 148 km on ground. LISS-II had two separate imaging sensors, LISS-II A and LISS-II B, with spatial resolution of 36.25 meters each and mounted on the spacecraft in such a way to provide a composite swath of 146.98 km on ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Science & Technology
    2 INDEX 1. Space Technology ............................................... 6 1.38 Juno Spacecraft ......................................................... 20 1.1 Types of Orbits ............................................................ 6 1.39 OSIRIS-REx ............................................................... 20 1.2 Types of Satellites ........................................................ 7 1.40 Orion Spacecraft ........................................................ 21 1.3 Launch Vehicles .......................................................... 7 1.41 Voyager 1 & Voyager 2 ............................................. 21 1.42 Dawn Mission ............................................................ 21 Indian Missions ........................................................ 10 1.43 Europa Clipper Mission............................................. 22 1.4 PSLV C-44/Kalamsat ................................................ 10 1.44 Lucy and Psyche ........................................................ 22 1.5 PSLV C-43/HysIS ...................................................... 10 1.45 Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) Mission .............. 22 1.6 HySIS ......................................................................... 11 1.46 CubeSat...................................................................... 23 1.7 PSLV C-42................................................................. 11 1.47 NICER ....................................................................... 23 1.8 PSLV C-41/IRNSS-1I................................................
    [Show full text]