05-10-06 Election Lr.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sample Ballot Primary
PRIMARY ELECTION BALLOT Nez Perce County, JUDICIAL NOMINATING Nez Perce County, 9 DEMOCRATIC PARTY Idaho 10 ELECTION BALLOT Idaho May 23, 2006 May 23, 2006 SAMPLE BALLOT CANDIDATES FOR NEZ PERCE COUNTY OFFICES JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT PRIMARY ELECTION COUNTY COMMISSIONER TO SUCCEED JUSTICE DAN EISMANN 173 TUESDAY, MAY 23, 2006 - NEZ PERCE COUNTY, IDAHO DAN EISMANN District No. 1 J.R. VAN TASSEL 155 POLLS OPEN 8:00 A.M. TO 8:00 P.M. VOTE FOR ONE VOTE FOR ONE LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT 7 COUNTY COMMISSIONER JUDGE OF THE COURT OF APPEALS PRECINCT POLLING PLACE Lewiston #20 ..................... Nez Perce County Fair Building District No. 3 DAVE STRADLEY 158 Lewiston #1 ............................ Lewiston Community Center Lewiston #21 ..................... Nez Perce County Fair Building TO SUCCEED JUDGE DARREL R. PERRY 177 Lewiston #2 ............................ Lewiston Community Center Lewiston #22 ..................... Nez Perce County Fair Building VOTE FOR ONE DARREL R. PERRY Lewiston #3 .................................... Trinity Lutheran Church Lewiston #23 ..................... Nez Perce County Fair Building VOTE FOR ONE CLERK OF THE PATTY WEEKS 160 Lewiston #4 ............................ Lewiston Community Center Lewiston #24 ..................... Nez Perce County Fair Building DISTRICT COURT Lewiston #5 .................... Woodworkers Local Lodge W364 Lewiston #25 ..................... Nez Perce County Fair Building VOTE FOR ONE Lewiston #6 ............................ Lewiston Community Center Lewiston #26 .................... -
Idaho Shows Strong Support for GNEP
Idaho shows strong support for GNEP Support for Idaho as a potential site for the Department of Energy's Global Nuclear Photo: Idaho mayors Energy Partnership (GNEP) project was abundant at the March 15 Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) scoping meeting. Turnout was considerable. Approximately 650 people participated in the event, and 132 speakers shared their opinions. The number attending was roughly double in size of the next-largest GNEP scoping meeting prior to Idaho Falls. Widespread support for the project was clear with approximately 95% of the speakers advocating the development of GNEP in Idaho or at Idaho National Laboratory. Throughout the evening, numerous private citizens and representatives of Idaho civic and business organizations provided compelling reasons why DOE should choose INL to Idaho Falls Mayor Jared Fuhriman was surrounded participate in the project - including the lab's history, current mission and resources. by 16 other mayors from Idaho as he read a joint statement that favored a critical GNEP role for INL. Political luminaries lined up to support GNEP. Spokesmen for the entire Idaho political delegation - all of Idaho's U.S. senators and congressmen, the governor, lieutenant governor, the state legislature, as well as 16 mayors and commissioners from 10 counties - stood up to read letters of support into the meeting record. The standing-room-only crowd included dozens of community leaders from counties surrounding INL. Among the key political figures represented were Sen. Larry Craig, Sen. Mike Crapo, Rep. Mike Simpson, Rep. Bill Sali, Gov. Butch Otter and mayors from across the state who offered written appeals to DOE to include INL as a vital element of GNEP. -
State of Idaho
STATE OF IDAHO CONTRIBUTIONS AND EXPENDITURES OF CANDIDATES FOR STATEWIDE, LEGISLATIVE, AND JUDICIAL OFFICE and POLITICAL COMMITTEES January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2006 and LOBBYIST EXPENDITURES 2005 - 2006 COMPILED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF BEN YSURSA SECRETARY OF STATE STATE OF IDAHO OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE BEN YSURSA Dear Citizens of Idaho: This report is the fourteenth compilation of the campaign disclosure and lobbyist expenditure reports filed pursuant to the "Sunshine Law." The purpose of this report is to disseminate the information in our files to the public in an easily accessible form. We would hope that this compilation will play an integral part in achieving the ultimate goal of the Sunshine Law - - Public Disclosure. In that regard I invite you to visit our elections website at www.sos.idaho.gov to access further campaign information. We invite and appreciate your suggestions for improving this report. Sincerely, BEN YSURSA Secretary of State P.O. Box 83720, Boise, Idaho 83720-0080 Elections Telephone: (208) 334-2852, FAX: (208) 334-2282 Located at 304 North 8th, Ste. 149 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction...................................................................iii Definitions.....................................................................iv SECTION I: Total Amount of Contributions and Expenditures Unopposed Candidates in 2006 ................................... 1 Statewide Candidates................................................... 2 District Judge Candidates............................................ -
Election 2006
APPENDIX: CANDIDATE PROFILES BY STATE We analyzed the fair trade positions of candidates in each race that the Cook Political Report categorized as in play. In the profiles below, race winners are denoted by a check mark. Winners who are fair traders are highlighted in blue text. Alabama – no competitive races___________________________________________ Alaska_________________________________________________________________ Governor OPEN SEAT – incumbent Frank Murkowski (R) lost in primary and was anti-fair trade. As senator, Murkowski had a 100% anti-fair trade voting record. 9 GOP Sarah Palin’s trade position is unknown. • Democratic challenger Tony Knowles is a fair trader. In 2004, Knowles ran against Lisa Murkowski for Senate and attacked her for voting for NAFTA-style trade deals while in the Senate, and for accepting campaign contributions from companies that off-shore jobs.1 Arizona________________________________________________________________ Senate: Incumbent GOP Sen. Jon Kyl. 9 Kyl is anti-fair trade. Has a 100% anti-fair trade record. • Jim Pederson (D) is a fair trader. Pederson came out attacking Kyl’s bad trade record in closing week of campaign, deciding to make off-shoring the closing issue. On Nov. 3 campaign statement: “Kyl has repeatedly voted for tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas, and he has voted against a measure that prohibited outsourcing of work done under federally funded contracts,” said Pederson spokesman Kevin Griffis, who added that Pederson “wants more protections [in trade pacts] related to child labor rules and environmental safeguards to help protect U.S. jobs.”2 House Arizona 1: GOP Rep. Rick Renzi incumbent 9 Renzi is anti-fair trade. 100% bad trade vote record. -
Executive Branch
EXECUTIVE BRANCH Bayhorse Ghost Town Photo Courtesy: Idaho Department of Commerce EXECUTIVE BRANCH 49 Downtown Boise Photos Courtesy: Boise Convention & Visitors Bureau 50 IDAHO BLUE BOOK The People of Idaho Legislative Judicial Branch Executive Branch Branch Senate Supreme Court Superintendent Lieutenant Secretary Attorney State State Governor of Public Governor of State General Controller Treasurer House of Instruction Representatives Court of Appeals Department Department Department Department Offi ce of the Department of of of of of State Board of Environmental Trial Administration Agriculture Commerce Correction Education Quality Courts Department Fish and Health and Department Department of Department of Game Welfare of Juvenile of Finance Department Department Insurance Corrections Labor Department Department Idaho Department of Department Department Idaho State of of Parks & State Self-Governing of of Tax Commission Lands Recreation Police Agencies Transportation Water Resources Shading indicates elective offi ces Qualifi cations of Executive Offi cers Method of Offi cer Selection Qualifi cation Term of Offi ce Governor Elected by greatest 30 years of age; U.S. Four years number of voters in Citizen; 2 year Idaho general election resident Lieutenant Same as governor Same as governor Four years Governor Secretary of State Same as governor 25 years of age; U.S. Four years Citizen; 2 year Idaho resident State Controller Same as governor 25 years of age; U.S. Four years Citizen; 2 year Idaho resident State Treasurer Same as governor 25 years of age; U.S. Four years Citizen; 2 year Idaho resident Attorney General Same as governor 30 years of age; U.S. Four years Citizen; admitted to the practice of law in Idaho; 2 year Idaho resident Superintendent Same as governor 25 years of age; Four years of Public U.S. -
Congressional Delegation
CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION Boise Depot Tower Photo courtesy of: Boise Convention & Visitors Bureau CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION 39 Congressional Districts 40 IDAHO BLUE BOOK Congressional Qualifi cations Method of Offi cer Selection Qualifi cation Term of Offi ce United Elected by greatest 30 years of age, US Six years States number of votes in citizen for at least 9 Senator general election years and an Idaho resident United Elected by greatest 25 years of age, US Two years States number of votes in citizen for at least 7 Congressman general election years and an Idaho resident Article I of the U.S. Constitution states that Congress will consist of two separate houses. A lawmaking body with two houses is called a bicameral legislature. The two houses that make up the U.S. Congress are the House of Representatives and the Senate. Congress is the primary lawmaking body in the U.S. government. To solve problems, Members of Congress introduce legislative proposals called bills or resolutions. After considering these proposals, Members vote to adopt or to reject them. Members of Congress also review the work of executive agencies to determine if they are following government policy, and may introduce new legislation based on what they discover. Bills accepted by both houses of Congress and by the President become law. When the President vetoes a bill and returns it to Congress, Congress reviews the reasons for the rejection but may still act to pass the bill. The U.S. Constitution allows Congress to override the President’s veto with a two-thirds majority vote of both the House and the Senate. -
Former Idaho Journalists
Former Idaho Journalists Anderson, KTVB-TV (Boise, reporter) Bogus Basin ski area (communications) Gretchen Anthony, Bob KTVB-TV (Boise, weather) Department of Water Resources Arledge, Sharla KTVB-TV (Boise, managing editor) City of Nampa Baker, Karen Idaho Statesman (Boise, managing HealthWise (senior vice president) editor) Bard, Steve Idaho Statesman (Boise) Cypress Semiconductor (Boise) Micron Technology Student, Boise State University Beaman, Jeff KTVB-TV (Boise, reporter) Idaho Power Co. (communications) Boles, Jan Idaho Press Tribune (Nampa, chief Albertson College of Idaho (archivist) photographer) Bostwick, Bob* KBCI-TV (Boise, reporter) Coeur d’Alene Tribe Casino (communications) KID-TV (Idaho Falls, reporter) Brown, Janelle Idaho Statesman (Boise) Boise State University (communications) Browning, Mark KPVI-TV (Pocatello), KBCI-TV State Board of Education (communications) (Boise) Bugger, Brad Idaho State Journal (Pocatello, U.S. Department of Energy reporter) (communications) Bunch, Al** Idaho Statesman (Boise) State Insurance Fund (communications) Camp, Roya Idaho Statesman (Boise, city editor) HealthWise Campbell, Joe Morning News (Blackfoot, assistant CH2M-Hill WG Idaho (CWI), editor) (communications) Carnopis, Mark Idaho Statesman (Boise) Department of Corrections (communications) Valley Regional Transit (community relations) Cawley, Eric KIDK-TV (Idaho Falls, reporter) Idaho State Legislature (Communications) Lance for Atty General (Campaign Manager) Idaho Atty General’s Office (Communications) Ada County Assessor -
Federal Government
Federal Government US Capitol Building Photo courtesy of Architect of the Capitol Congressional Districts 46 IDAHO BLUE BOOK U.S. Congress Article I of the U.S. Constitution states agencies to determine if they are following that, “All legislative Powers herein granted government policy, and may introduce new shall be vested in a Congress of the United legislation based on what they discover. States, which shall consist of a Senate and a Bills accepted by both houses of Con- House of Representatives.” This bicameral gress and by the President become law. legislature (a governing body with two However, the President may veto a bill houses) is the primary lawmaking body in and return it to Congress. Congress then the U.S. government. To solve problems, reviews the reasons for the rejection but Federal Members of Congress introduce legislative may still act to pass the bill. The U.S. Con- proposals called bills or resolutions. After stitution allows Congress to override the considering these proposals Members vote President’s veto with a two-thirds majority to adopt or to reject them. Members of vote of both the House and the Senate. Congress also review the work of executive Members of Congress Members of the Senate and of the House elected for a period of six years, while of Representatives are known respectively representatives are elected for a period as senators and representatives. Each of two years. Furthermore, senators and Member of Congress is elected by representatives must meet the following receiving the greatest number of votes minimum requirements: in the general election. -
Congressional Delegation
CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION Blacks Creek Road overlooking the south fork of the Boise River. Photo courtesy of: Rachel “Annie” Cuellar CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATION 37 Congressional Districts 38 IDAHO BLUE BOOK Congressional Qualifications Method of Officer Selection Qualification Term of Office United Elected by greatest 30 years of age, US Six years States number of votes in citizen for at least 9 Senator general election years and an Idaho resident United Elected by greatest 25 years of age, US Two years States number of votes in citizen for at least 7 Congressman general election years and an Idaho resident Article I of the U.S. Constitution states that Congress will consist of two separate houses. A lawmaking body with two houses is called a bicameral legislature. The two houses that make up the U.S. Congress are the House of Representatives and the Senate. Congress is the primary lawmaking body in the U.S. government. To solve problems, Members of Congress introduce legislative proposals called bills or resolutions. After considering these proposals, Members vote to adopt or to reject them. Members of Congress also review the work of executive agencies to determine if they are following government policy, and may introduce new legislation based on what they discover. Bills accepted by both houses of Congress and by the President become law. When the President vetoes a bill and returns it to Congress, Congress reviews the reasons for the rejection but may still act to pass the bill. The U.S. Constitution allows Congress to override the President’s veto with a two-thirds majority vote of both the House and the Senate. -
From Macacas to Turban Toppers: the Rise in Xenophobic and Racist Rhetoric in American Political Discourse
SOUTH ASIAN AMERICANS LEADING TOGETHER FROM MACACAS TO TURBAN TOPPERS: THE RISE IN XENOPHOBIC AND RACIST RHETORIC IN AMERICAN POLITICAL DISCOURSE OCTOBER 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 PART I COMMENTS AIMED GENERALLY AT SOUTH ASIAN, MUSLIM, SIKH, AND ARAB AMERICAN COMMUNITIES 4 PART II COMMENTS AIMED AT SOUTH ASIAN CANDIDATES FOR PUBLIC OFFICE 19 PART III TIPS FOR COMMUNITY MEMBERS RESPONDING TO XENOPHOBIC RHETORIC 22 TIMELINE OF KEY POST-SEPTEMBER 11TH DOMESTIC POLICIES AFFECTING 25 SOUTH ASIAN, MUSLIM, SIKH, AND ARAB AMERICAN COMMUNITIES ENDNOTES 28 FROM MACACAS TO TURBAN TOPPERS: THE RISE IN XENOPHOBIC AND RACIST RHETORIC IN AMERICAN POLITICAL DISCOURSE 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY research about such incidents only after that time, primarily Xenophobia and racism have no place in political and civic because of their unprecedented frequency as part of the discourse. Yet, a pattern of such rhetoric continues to exist in broader backlash against these communities. America’s political environment today. For decades, African Divided into three primary sections, the report touches upon Americans and Latinos have been subjected to racist rhetoric the following themes: (1) documented examples of in the political sphere. More recently, as this report shows, xenophobic rhetoric, aimed generally at South Asian, Muslim, South Asians, Muslims, Sikhs, and Arab Americans have been Sikh, or Arab American communities as a whole; the targets of such rhetoric by public officials and political (2) documented examples of such rhetoric aimed specifically candidates from both sides of the aisle. Even more alarming at South Asian candidates running for elected office; and (3) is the use of xenophobia and racism to stir negative responses tips for community members on how to respond to such against political candidates of South Asian descent. -
NORMAL WINNERS: the STRATEGIES of STRONG CANDIDATES Ellen Gutman Galantucci a Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Unive
NORMAL WINNERS:THE STRATEGIES OF STRONG CANDIDATES Ellen Gutman Galantucci A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science. Chapel Hill 2015 Approved by: James A. Stimson John H. Aldrich Virginia H. Gray Michael B. MacKuen Jason M. Roberts c 2015 Ellen Gutman Galantucci ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT ELLEN GUTMAN GALANTUCCI: Normal Winners: The Strategies of Strong Candidates. (Under the direction of James A. Stimson) Much research has focused on what challengers do to win an election. Little research has been dedicated to exploring the behavior of candidates who are expected to win their elections. Candidates who find themselves in close races are likely to act differently than candidates in landslide elections because, as Kahn and Kenney (1997) suggest, voters eval- uate candidates differently based on the intensity of the election. What things do candidates who are expected to easily win their elections discuss? By content analyzing websites of candidates for the U.S. House, Senate, and state gov- ernorships from 2008, I find that candidates who are expected to win their elections are likely to act in ways that will not draw attention to the election. They are less likely to discuss controversial issues or mention their opponents than candidates in close races or those expected to lose. Alternatively, they focus on valence issues and constituent service. The same is true for their advertisements. Expected winners air fewer ads than candidates in competitive elections and the ones they do air tend to have less controversial content. -
Senate State Affairs Committee
Senate State Affairs Committee Minutes 2005 MINUTES SENATE STATE AFFAIRS COMMITTEE DATE: Friday, January 14, 2005 TIME: 8:00 a.m. PLACE: Room 437 MEMBERS Chairman Burtenshaw, Vice Chairman McKenzie, Senators Darrington, PRESENT: Davis, Stegner, Little, Stennett, Malepeai MEMBERS Geddes ABSENT/ EXCUSED: GUESTS: Clive Strong, Office of the Attorney General CONVENE: Chairman Burtenshaw called the meeting to order at 8:08 a.m. NEZ PERCE Presentation from Mr. Clive Strong, with the Attorney General's Office. AGREEMENT: Mr. Clive Strong, Division Chief of the Natural Resources Division for the Attorney General's Office, provided the committee with an unabridged version of the Nez Perce Water Rights Agreement as well as a short two-sided handout of the main points of the Agreement, which is attached to these minutes. Mr. Strong stated that this Agreement has a lot of support but added that it does not have unanimous support. The Agreement came about as a result of the Snake River Basin Adjudication. In 1987, the state commenced the SRBA to quantify all water right claims in the state of Idaho and to provide a comprehensive inventory of all the water rights. He explained that Idaho follows the prior appropriations doctrine. He stated that the federal Indian reserved water rights are an exception to state water law. Indian reserved water rights originated from the United States Supreme court case of Winters v. United States. This case involved the Fort Peck Reservation in Montana. Because all of the water supply had been fully appropriated under state law, there was insufficient water remaining to irrigate tribal lands.