DOCSLIB.ORG

Marsec Conference 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MARSEC COE Editorial Director Sümer Kayser Captain (TUR N) Executive Manager Devrim Bülent AKKUŞOĞLU Captain (TUR N) Editor-In-Chief Dr. Dirk SIEBELS Murat AKBAŞ MCPO (TUR N) Layout Production Ahmet ÜZÜLMEZ CPO (TUR N) Sezer UYANIK Ensign (TUR N) Review/LEGAD Özden KORAL Lt.Cdr. (TUR N) Published by NATO Maritime Security Centre of Excellence (MARSEC COE) Enquiries: Please direct enquiries to: Maritime Security Centre of Excellence, [email protected] or Phone: +90-212-398 0100 (Ext: 5885) All rights reserved Copyright © 2021 This paper is copyrighted. Portions of the document may be quoted or reproduced without permission, provided a standard source credit is included. Any comprehensive reproduction requires written permission of the publisher. Disclaimer The views, conclusions and recommendations expressed or implied within are the opinions of the authors/contributors and do not necessarily reflect/represent NATO MARSEC COE’s or NATO’s official positions. -2- MARSEC COE TABLE OF CONTENTS Forewords 5 Introduction of the Key Note Speaker 8 Background & Narrative 12 Report of Proceedings 14 CONFERENCE PAPERS 39 Dr.Emre BAYSOY 41 The Increasing Role of Maritime Power in Contemporary Geopolitics Author Flotilla Admiral Prof. Dr. Dsc Boyan MEDNIKAROV & Assoc.Prof. Dr. Siyana LUTZKANOVA 49 The Impact of Some Geopolitical Aspects on Maritime Strategy from the Bulgarian Perspective Assoc.Prof. Sercan EROL& Research Assistant Sait Baki DEMİR Examination of the Ship Traffic Regime in North Sea Route According to 55 International Maritime Rules Prof.Guy THOMAS 65 Space-based Global Maritime Awareness is about to Come of Age Lieutenant Colonel Bernd ALLERT Preventing the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction in the Maritime 70 Domain Cdr. (R.) Marten MEIJER Maritime Strategies of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation and the African 75 Union: Similarities and Recommendations Capt. (N) Auras-Liviu COMAN Improving of Readiness and Protecting Crews to Maintain: A reliable Maritime 80 Security Level in Pandemic Environment Capt. (N) Todd BONNAR 86 Increasing Resilience in NATO ISR Dr. Dirk SIEBELS 102 Outlook on Maritime Security Challenges in a Pandemic Environment Capt. (N) Daniel-Cornel TANASESCU The Maritime Security Strategy– Analysis on Using Autonomous Maritime Systems 111 for Undersea Challenges Dr. Keiko KONO A case study of the dispute in the South China Sea: an Approach by Claimant 120 Countries and ASEAN and Its Impact on Maritime Security in the Region Gözde BOZTEPE KARATAŞ & Orhan AYHAN 134 Advanced Analysis and Fusion Systems for Improved Risk Analysis at Sea Mr. Sam ZWOLINSKI 141 How can navies serve their countries at the start of a transformative decade? SPEECHES 149 Welcome Speech 150 -3 - MARSEC COE Closing Speech 152 Closing Remarks 154 Pictorial 155 Presentatitons 167 Speakers’ Profiles 205 About NATO MARSEC COE 228 Conference Programme 231 Conference Organization Committee 237 -4 - MARSEC COE -5- MARSEC COE FOREWORD Maritime security has been an important component of international relations throughout history, especially in the global economy. Maritime domain which is vital for global trade, also carry some threats such as terrorism, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction; cross-border organized crime and irregular migration. With the developing technology, cyber threats have been added to these threats as well. Nowadays, COVID-19 which has been believed to create a new world order, has had serious effects on the maritime domain. In order to draw attention to this crucial issue in terms of maritime security, we planned to conduct Maritime Security Conference-2020 with the theme of “Maritime Security in Pandemic Environment” as our first diamond event in June 2020 right after the completion of NATO accreditation of our centre. However, it has to be postponed to September 16 and 17, due to this pandemic which has still been affecting the world on a large scale, including maritime domain. The aim of the conference was to provide a global and regional focus for maritime security and to discuss maritime security related issues including the challenges and I think the conference was quite fruitful and gave the opportunity to bring forward maritime security challenges, potential impacts of the COVID-19 on maritime security together with some solutions to deal with these challenges as much as possible. As I always emphasize that closer inter-agency cooperation with the universities and international organizations along with other stake holders of maritime security is indispensable to create a safer and more secure maritime environment. As a requirement of our concept and in order to support efforts in the field of maritime security at the highest level, this conference will be conducted annually with new challenging themes. I hope I may host you in İstanbul for the next conference in person rather than virtual. Lastly, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the moderators, speakers and presenters who contributed to our conference with their valuable presentations, to the conference core staff who worked with great devotion for running this organization smoothly and to those who actively participated in the conference with their questions and comments, last but not least to the conference academic committee who reviewed all the articles for the sake of conference. Sümer KAYSER Capt. (TUR-N) NATO MARSEC COE Director -6- MARSEC COE FOREWORD The Maritime Security Conference-2020 was an excellent platform to look at issues related to maritime security in a unique setting. Only a few months before the conference, a pandemic had started to spread, leading to many new and unexpected challenges. Navies and other maritime agencies also felt the impacts of these challenges. It was therefore important to identify lessons learned and to start discussions about maritime security in a pandemic environment as soon as possible. Unfortunately, the term 'maritime security' is not used in a systematic way, neither by academics nor by practitioners. In short, it means different things to different people. Even naval officers may have very different perspectives. Few navies are really capable of projecting power at sea, many others are essentially limited to law enforcement operations in their own country's Exclusive Economic Zone. In addition, there are many stakeholders outside of navies who are – broadly speaking – interested in maritime security. A secure environment at sea ensures that fishing grounds as well as maritime trade are protected, allows for offshore oil and gas production and enables coastal tourism to develop. Many other aspects could be named as well, but none of them are an end in itself. Governments should rather see maritime security as an enabler for economic growth and development as well as for the marine environment's protection. None of this has changed in the age of COVID-19. At the same time, the pandemic had a significant impact on the tactical and operational level, but also on the level of high-ranking military and political decision-makers. The articles in this book, based on presentations during the conference in September 2020, are not a complete summary of all these impacts. However, they underline the impacts of the pandemic in many different areas. Moreover, the authors provide thoughts and ideas which may help to solve issues in other areas. The staff at MARSEC COE must be commended for bringing such a broad range of experts in different fields together to stimulate further discussions. I am already looking forward to future courses, workshops and conferences hosted by MARSEC COE. The centre has already provided a large number of outstanding contributions to discussions around maritime security since its inception in 2012, and I am certain that many more will follow. Dr.Dirk SIEBELS Editör-In-Chief -7- MARSEC COE -8- MARSEC COE INTRODUCTION of THE KEY NOTE SPEAKER Vice Admiral Keith Blount, CB OBE Royal Navy Commander, Allied Maritime Command First let me congratulate MARSEC for its accreditation as a NATO Centre of Excellence by the North Atlantic Council. It is a recognition that you have the expertise and experience that will be of tremendous benefit to the Alliance. It is my desire to deepen and strengthen MARCOM’s links with MARSEC and with all the COEs. NATO is at its core a maritime Alliance. The clue is in the name, and that core aspect endures today. The Atlantic, Mediterranean, Black Sea and Baltic unite our nations geographically and strategically. MARSEC’s accreditation will help build and strengthen our Alliance, our understanding and our outreach across the region. I cannot stress enough the importance of this first conference and of its main theme of maritime security in a COVID-19 environment. As we are all acutely aware, the pandemic has had a massive impact on daily life, not only in terms of economic consequences, but simply by the manner in which we are able to carry out the day-to-day operations of our organisations. This includes things like: the facilitation of our workforce, the restructuring of our procedures and processes to adapt to teleworking, and the safe and calculated approach to bringing everyone back together in a safe new working environment as we are permitted to do so. And if those unexpected organisational challenges were not difficult enough, we would have been required to accomplish them while ensuring our missions continue -- and while continuing to employ safe measures to limit and minimize risks to our personnel. Because even as we know the devastating impact of COVID around the world, we also know that our competitors might be tempted by even the slightest glitch in our posture or smallest window of opportunity to exploit such a gap. On the maritime front, I am very proud of the resilience our forces have shown during these challenging times. On the surface, it may seem that there is an inherent advantage to being in the maritime domain during a pandemic.
Recommended publications
  • Unlocking NATO's Amphibious Potential

    Unlocking NATO's Amphibious Potential

    November 2020 Perspective EXPERT INSIGHTS ON A TIMELY POLICY ISSUE J.D. WILLIAMS, GENE GERMANOVICH, STEPHEN WEBBER, GABRIELLE TARINI Unlocking NATO’s Amphibious Potential Lessons from the Past, Insights for the Future orth Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members maintain amphibious capabilities that provide versatile and responsive forces for crisis response and national defense. These forces are routinely employed in maritime Nsecurity, noncombatant evacuation operations (NEO), counterterrorism, stability operations, and other missions. In addition to U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) and U.S. Navy forces, the Alliance’s amphibious forces include large ships and associated landing forces from five nations: France, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, and the United Kingdom (UK). Each of these European allies—soon to be joined by Turkey—can conduct brigade-level operations, and smaller elements typically are held at high readiness for immediate response.1 These forces have been busy. Recent exercises and operations have spanned the littorals of West and North Africa, the Levant, the Gulf of Aden and Arabian Sea, the Caribbean, and the Pacific. Given NATO’s ongoing concerns over Russia’s military posture and malign behavior, allies with amphibious capabilities have also been exploring how these forces could contribute to deterrence or, if needed, be employed as part of a C O R P O R A T I O N combined and joint force in a conflict against a highly some respects, NATO’s ongoing efforts harken back to the capable nation-state. Since 2018, NATO’s headquarters Cold War, when NATO’s amphibious forces routinely exer- and various commands have undertaken initiatives and cised in the Mediterranean and North Atlantic as part of a convened working groups to advance the political intent broader strategy to deter Soviet aggression.
  • Why the Black Sea Matters

    Why the Black Sea Matters

    NEW STRATEGY CENTER Center for American Seapower WHY THE BLACK SEA MATTERS POLICY PAPER – January 2017 – 1 WHY THE BLACK SEA MATTERS NEW STRATEGY CENTER Sponsored by: 2 WHY THE BLACK SEA MATTERS NEW STRATEGY CENTER CENTER FOR AMERICAN SEAPOWER, HUDSON INSTITUTE History is not only about the past For most of its ancient and mediaeval history, the Black Sea 1936 which, although it reflected the political and technical basin was the meeting place of flourishing civilizations, circumstances of that time in terms of restrictions on the imperial ambitions, confrontations for domination and tonnage and duration of sojourn for the non-riparian naval control, lucrative trade and cultural synergies. Greek city-states vessels, is still valid today. established trading colonies all along the sea shores as early as 7th century B.C., Byzantium ruled for centuries through an World War II changed the regional geopolitical picture once intricate web of alliances and selective military interventions, again. During the war, fierce battles took place in Crimea, the Tatars of the Golden Horde supervised a vital segment of especially over the naval port of Sevastopol, which accounts for the ancient Silk Road from China to Europe, Venice and Genoa the special symbolic value of those places in the Russian psyche. established thriving trading posts that survived until the end With the exception of Turkey, which chose to join NATO in of the 15th century, when they were superseded by the growing 1952, all the other political entities around the Black Sea were might of the Ottoman Empire, only to be challenged by the either part of the USSR or Soviet satellite states, members of imperial expansion of Russia, which reached the Black Sea the Warsaw Treaty.
  • Flotilla Admiral Georgi Penev Deputy Commander of The

    Flotilla Admiral Georgi Penev Deputy Commander of The

    FLOTILLA ADMIRAL GEORGI PENEV DEPUTY COMMANDER OF THE BULGARIAN NAVY Flotilla Admiral Georgi Penev Penev, Bulgarian Navy is a native of Provadia, Bulgaria, and was born on 19 August 1969. In 1989, he graduated from the Secondary Polytechnic School in Provadia, Bulgaria. Flotilla Admiral Penev graduated the Bulgarian Naval Academy in Varna where he got a Master Degree of Science in Navigation (1994). He was commissioned as Navigation Officer from the Bulgarian Naval Academy on August 1994. From 1995 to 1997, he served as Anti-submarine Warfare Officer onboard of KONI class frigate BGS SMELI in Varna Naval Base. His next seagoing assignment was Executive Officer of the KONI class frigate BGS SMELI from 1997 to 2003. In 2003, Flotilla Admiral Penev was selected to attend the Rakovski National Defence Academy in Sofia, and graduated in 2005. After his graduation, Flotilla Admiral Penev was appointed as Commanding Officer of the KONI class frigate BGS SMELI from 2005 to 2007. His next appointment was as Chief of Staff of the First Patrol Frigate and Corvettes Squadron in Varna Naval Base from 2007 to 2011. In 2011, Flotilla Admiral Penev was appointed as Squadron Commander of the First Patrol Frigate and Corvettes Squadron in Varna Naval Base. In 2013, Flotilla Admiral Penev reported as a student to the Rakovski National Defence College in Sofia and graduated in 2014. In 2014, Flotilla Admiral Penev was appointed as Chief of Staff in Bulgarian Naval Base, and in 2016 he received an assignment in the Bulgarian Navy Headquarters as Chief of Staff. In 2018 he assumed his current position as a Deputy Commander of the Bulgarian Navy.
  • Pamphlet to Accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3131

    Pamphlet to Accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3131

    Bedrock Geologic Map of the Seward Peninsula, Alaska, and Accompanying Conodont Data By Alison B. Till, Julie A. Dumoulin, Melanie B. Werdon, and Heather A. Bleick Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3131 View of Salmon Lake and the eastern Kigluaik Mountains, central Seward Peninsula 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................1 Sources of data ....................................................................................................................................1 Components of the map and accompanying materials .................................................................1 Geologic Summary ........................................................................................................................................1 Major geologic components ..............................................................................................................1 York terrane ..................................................................................................................................2 Grantley Harbor Fault Zone and contact between the York terrane and the Nome Complex ..........................................................................................................................3 Nome Complex ............................................................................................................................3
  • Davis-Monthan Afb 1940 - 1976 Preface

    Davis-Monthan Afb 1940 - 1976 Preface

    DAVIS-MONTHAN AFB 1940 - 1976 PREFACE This history, in its final form, is the result of almost three years of off-and-on effort on the part of this historian. It has had to be sandwiched in between the myriad taskings associated with three different assignments. It began at Davis-Monthan AFB in 1979 while assigned there as the historian for the 390th Strategic Missile Wing. My research notes and supporting documents came with me when I was subsequently transferred to the Headquarters SAC Office of the Historian and then later to the 4000th Satellite Operations Group at Offutt AFB, Nebraska. The need for a complete base history became painfully obvious as soon as I began my initial research. There was very little data available at Davis-Monthan AFB concerning the history of the installation; other than a few short Information Office history handouts of the type often given to newcomers and visitors. The majority of substantive material on base activities over the years had been lost as host units switched repeatedly throughout the station’s existence. Those units were subsequently inactiviated or transferred to other bases. Accordingly, the majority of material presented herein had to be obtained at the Albert F. Simpson Historical Research Center, Maxwell AFB, Alabama. Without the invaluable assistance of the many dedicated professionals at the Simpson Center, this history could never have been compiled. The transfer of Davis-Monthan AFB from the Strategic Air Command to the Tactical Air Command on 30 September 1976 ends the period of
  • Military Italian F-35A Lightning Ii

    Military Italian F-35A Lightning Ii

    MILITARY ITALIAN F-35A LIGHTNING II ndoubtedly the most complex, partner, with the Netherlands. Subsequently, Eighteen months on, thanks to the advanced and often controversial Italy was the fi rst nation to build and activate cooperation of the Italian MoD and the programme ever been launched in a Final Assembly and Checkout facility, Aeronautica Militare (Italian Air Force) and a the history of aviation: an accurate where the F-35 Lightning II is assembled. discussion with Colonel Davide Marzinotto, description of the F-35 Joint Strike Italy subsequently fl ew the fi rst F-35 aircraft 32° Stormo’s commander, AIR International UFighter programme, especially in Italy. produced outside the United States. Italy was was granted clearance to gain fi rst-hand December will mark the 20th anniversary also the fi rst nation in the world (excluding experience of the progress made by the Italian of the nation’s participation in the the United States) to introduce the new F-35 fl eet. programme following the signing of a fi ghter into service. The fi rst examples arrived Colonel Marzinotto is a former AMX and memorandum of agreement for the Concept at Amendola Air Base on December 12, 2016, F-2000 pilot. He commanded 20° Gruppo, Demonstration Phase. Four years later, destined for 13° Gruppo (13th Squadron), the Italian F-2000 operational conversion Italy joined the System Development and one of the component squadrons with the unit, assignment to the F-35 Joint Program Demonstration (SDD) phase as a second tier resident 32° Stormo (32nd Wing). O ce in Crystal City, Virginia, prior to Quinta generazione Italiana Troupe Azzurra Troupe 42 | www.airinternational.com ITALIAN F-35A LIGHTNING II MILITARY undergoing F-35 pilot conversion and be undertaken concurrently with the initial confi guration ahead of Block 3F, the fi rst subsequent appointment as the commander production phase su cient to equip US full-up operational standard.
  • Forward Deployed by Jennifer Hlad

    Forward Deployed by Jennifer Hlad

    Forward Deployed By Jennifer Hlad KEEPING ON IN QATAR Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Egypt, and other Muslim nations in June cut diplomatic ties and sea and land connections with Qatar, saying the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) country supports terrorism. Saudi Arabia made the decision “as a result of grave viola- tions being committed by the authorities in Doha over the past years,” according to a statement posted by the official Saudi news agency. Despite upheaval in Qatar, USAF continues operations, like In the statement, Saudi Arabia accused Qatar of supporting this B-52’s arrival, at al Udeid Air Base. the Muslim Brotherhood, ISIS, al Qaeda, Iran-backed “terrorist groups,” and other extremists. The exercise included troops from Belgium, Canada, Finland, Just hours after the announcement, commercial airlines in the France, Germany, Norway, the Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, region began suspending flights between Doha and cities in the the United Kingdom, and the US. Arctic Challenge included four other countries. However, US military aircraft continued to live-flying training for offensive and defensive air combat. conduct missions out of al Udeid Air Base, Qatar, said Lt. Col. The goal was to work with partner nations and increase Damien Pickart, spokesman for US Air Forces Central Command. interoperability, said Lt. Col. Jason Zumwalt, commander of the That included flights in support of Operation Inherent Resolve, 493rd Fighter Squadron. Freedom’s Sentinel, and chartered flights that carry service “These practice opportunities and experiences allow our pilots members to and from the area, Pickart said. and maintainers to work together side-by-side with our partners “The United States and the coalition are grateful to the Qataris and allies to plan, execute, and debrief some very complex mis- for their longstanding support of our presence and their enduring sions.
  • The Importance of Protection 57 60 1

    The Importance of Protection 57 60 1

    Arctic Ocean B e a u Utqiagvik f o r t Wrangel 4 (Point Barrow) S e a Island 62 49 52 3 61 1 2 Pacific Walrus Haulout 21. Dezhnev Bay 42. Tyulen’e Ozero Bay 58 The Importance of Protection 57 60 1. Cape Blossom 22. Anastasia Bay 43. Srednyaya Bay 56 59 23. Bogoslava Island 44. Somneniye Chukchi Sea 2. Somnitelnaya Spit 55 24. Cape Tiomney 45. Olutorskaya Spit The Walrus Islands State Game Sanctuary (WISGS) was established 51 3. Davidova Spit 54 25. Cape Sery-Anana 46. Lekalo Spit in 1960 to protect Pacific walrus haulout sites on seven small craggy 4. Gavai 39 53 5. Kolyuchyn Island 26. Verkhoturova Island 47. Cape Vankarem 47 27. Cape Golenishcheva 48. Cape Onmyn islands in northern Bristol Bay: Round Island, Summit Island, Crooked 48 6. Belyaka Spit 7. Strait of Neskenpil’gyn Lagoon 28. Cape Semionova 49. Ayon Island Island, High Island, Black Rock, and The Twins. Chukotka, Russia 5 7 30 50 29. Little Diomede Island 50. Cape Serdtse-Kamen’ t S o u 8. Unlisted 6 i e n u d a e b 30. Kotzebue Sound 51. Ryrkaipii r z t 9. Cape Inkigur 9 t 10 o The sanctuary includes the surrounding waters that support a diverse S K 31. King Island 52. Cape Shelagsky 10. Cape Dezhnev 16 12 11 group of marine mammals, seabirds, and other marine wildlife. 15 32. Gambell 53. Cape Lisburne g 29 11. Big Diomede Island 17 n Alaska, USA i 31 A b a r 33. Savoonga 54.
  • Maritime Safety of NATO Borders in the Baltic Sea Region

    Maritime Safety of NATO Borders in the Baltic Sea Region

    Historia i Polityka No. 30(37)/2019, pp. 77–87 www.hip.umk.pl ISSN 1899-5160, e-ISSN 2391-7652 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/HiP.2019.037 Miłosz GAC WSB University, Faculty of Finance and Management, Gdańsk, Poland Maritime Safety of NATO Borders in the Baltic Sea Region Bezpieczeństwo morskich granic NATO w regionie Morza Bałtyckiego • Abstrakt • • Abstract • Region Morza Bałtyckiego jest specyficznym ob- The Baltic Sea Region (BSR) is a specific area szarem leżącym na styku sprzecznych interesów lying between the areas of conflicting political politycznych Wschodu i Zachodu, co sprawia, interests of the East and West, making it an ob- że jest obiektem szczególnego zainteresowania ject of particular interest of the North Atlantic tak Sojuszu Północnoatlantyckiego, jak i Fede- Treaty Organisation and the Russian Federa- racji Rosyjskiej. Obecną sytuację charakteryzu- tion. The current situation is characterized by je wysoka militaryzacja tego rejonu, związana the high militarization of the region, mainly przede wszystkim z wykorzystaniem rosyjskiego related to the use of the Russian power sector, sektora siłowego, a szczególnie zdolności prze- with the anti-access capabilities in the Kalinin- ciwdostępowych w Obwodzie Kaliningradzkim. grad District in particular. Changes in the secu- Zmiany w środowisku bezpieczeństwa na tym rity environment in this area have resulted in the obszarze spowodowały zwiększenie zdolności increased capabilities to deter and the collective do odstraszania i zbiorowej obrony wszyst- defence capabilities of all NATO members, as kich członków NATO w ramach wzmacniania part of strengthening the Alliance’s eastern flank. wschodniej flanki Sojuszu. Słowa kluczowe: Rosja; NATO; region Mo- Keywords: Russian Federation; NATO; Bal- rza Bałtyckiego; Baltops tic Sea Region; Baltops Introduction The Baltic Sea Region has a special role in the maritime safety strategy of the Baltic Sea members of the North Atlantic Alliance.
  • Examples on International Training and Exercise Events in Which Finland Plans to Participate Or Which Will Be Organised by Finland in 2021

    Examples on International Training and Exercise Events in Which Finland Plans to Participate Or Which Will Be Organised by Finland in 2021

    Examples on international training and exercise events in which Finland plans to participate or which will be organised by Finland in 2021 Exercise Date Location Cyber exercise Early 2021 Baltic countries CROSSED SWORDS 21 Artillery planning exercise Early 2021 Germany DYNAMIC FRONT 21 Naval mine countermeasures exercise Early 2021 Belgium DYNAMIC MOVE Air Force command post exercise Early 2021 Germany KALKAR SKY Engineering exercise Spring Italy BISON COUNTER 2021 Marine oil spill exercise Spring Estonia/Gulf of Finland CLEAN SEA21 C3 Exercise Spring Finland/Sweden/Norway FIN ENDEAVOR United States C3 exercise Spring Europe/Finland TIMBER EXPRESS Finnish Defence Forces’ main military Spring/Summer Finland exercise PVPSH21 Air Force command post exercise Spring/Summer Germany RAMSTEIN AMBITION C3 Exercise Spring/Summer Poland TRANSFORMATIONAL COALITION WARRIOR INTEROPERABILITY EXERCISE (CWIX) Flight operation exercise June Finland/Sweden/Norway ARCTIC CHALLENGE EXERCISE 21 (ACE21) Multinational naval exercise June Baltic Sea BALTIC OPERATIONS (BALTOPS) EU planning exercise MILEX 21 Spring/autumn Europe JEF command post exercise Summer/autumn Sweden JEF Ex JOINT PROTECTOR Engineering exercise EUROPEAN September Austria GUARDIAN Multinational naval exercise NORTHERN September Baltic Sea COASTS 21 (NOCO21) CBRN threats exercise September Sweden RECCEX 21 Training event September Latvia STEADFAST PYRAMID/STEADFAST PINNACLE Marine oil spill exercise Autumn Finland/Gulf of Finland BALEX DELTA 21 Naval mine countermeasures exercise Autumn Belgium/Netherlands
  • Italian Specail Report

    Italian Specail Report

    SHAPING THE FUTURE OF ITALIAN AIRPOWER 10/13/15 Second Line of Defense Second Line of Defense Shaping the Future of Italian Airpower SECOND LINE OF DEFENSE Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 2 THE FIRST FLIGHT AS A KEY BASELINE EVENT .................................................................................................... 2 THE ITALIAN AIR FORCE SHAPES A WAY AHEAD: THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE ITALIAN CHIEF OF STAFF ......... 6 ITALIAN AIRPOWER MODERNIZATION: A DISCUSSION WITH THE EDITOR OF RIVISTA ITALIANA DIFESA ..... 8 RESHAPING CONCEPTS OF OPERATIONS: EUROFIGHTER, THE F-35, THE UK AND ITALY ............................. 10 THE RECONFIGURATION OF EUROFIGHTER ................................................................................................................ 11 THE IMPACT OF THE F-35 FLEET ............................................................................................................................... 12 WORKING NEW CONCEPTS OF OPERATIONS ............................................................................................................. 14 EVOLVING WEAPONS AT THE VORTEX OF THE CHANGE .............................................................................................. 15 LEVERAGING WEAPONS COMMONALITIES: THE CASE OF THE METEOR MISSILE ............................................................... 16 AN UPDATE ON EUROFIGHTER MODERNIZATION: THE
  • Eighteenth International Seapower Symposium: Report of the Proceedings

    Eighteenth International Seapower Symposium: Report of the Proceedings

    U.S. Naval War College U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons International Seapower Symposium Events 10-2007 Eighteenth International Seapower Symposium: Report of the Proceedings The U.S. Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/iss Recommended Citation Naval War College, The U.S., "Eighteenth International Seapower Symposium: Report of the Proceedings" (2007). International Seapower Symposium. 3. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/iss/3 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Events at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Seapower Symposium by an authorized administrator of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen EIGHTEENTH INTERNATIONAL SEAPOWER SYMPOSIUM Report of the Proceedings ISS18.prn C:\Documents and Settings\john.lanzieri.ctr\Desktop\NavalWarCollege\5164_NWC_ISS-18\Ventura\ISS18.vp Friday, August 28, 2009 3:11:10 PM Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen ISS18.prn C:\Documents and Settings\john.lanzieri.ctr\Desktop\NavalWarCollege\5164_NWC_ISS-18\Ventura\ISS18.vp Friday, August 28, 2009 3:11:12 PM Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen EIGHTEENTH INTERNATIONAL SEAPOWER SYMPOSIUM Report of the Proceedings 17–19 October 2007 Edited by John B. Hattendorf Ernest J. King Professor of Maritime History Naval War College with John W. Kennedy NAVAL WAR COLLEGE NEWPORT,RHODE ISLAND