Effects of the March 1964 Alaska Earthquake on the Hydrology of the Anchorage Area

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Effects of the March 1964 Alaska Earthquake on the Hydrology of the Anchorage Area THE ALASKA EARTHQUAKE, MARCH 27, 1964: EFFECTS ON THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMEN Effects of the March 1964 Alaska Earthquake On the Hydrology Of the Anchorage Area By ROGER M. WALLER A description and analysis of temporary and lasting eflects of the earthquake on surface and ground water in the Anchorage area GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 544-B UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1966 -- - - For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 60 cents (paper cover) THE ALASKA EARTHQUAKE SERIES The U.S. Geological Survey is publishing the results of investigations of the earthquake in a series of six Professional Papers. Professional Paper 544 describes the effects on the hydrology. Other Pro- fessional Papers describe the effects of the earth- quake on communities; the regional effects of the earthquake; the effects on transportation, communi- cations, and utilities; and the history of the field investigations and the reconstruction effort. CONTENTS Abstract_------------------------------------------------------------------ Introduction--------------------------------------------------------------- Changes in the hydrologic system ......................................... ---- Streams-_---__-------------------------------------------------------- Lakes_---___---------------------------------------------------------- Groundwater---------------------------------------------------------- Waterwells__-__--------------------------------------------------- Response of the shallow water table___---____-_-_--------------------- Artesian-aquifer response- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - -- - - -. - - - - - - - - - - - - - Piezometric levels._---_-__------------------------------------------ Causes of residual changes- - _---------------- ........................ Discharge zones-------------------------------------------------------- Chemicalqualit~i------------------------------------------------------- Ground water in the Bootlegger Cove Clay ..................................... Subsidence.---_----_----.---------------------------------------------------- Conclusions--_-----_-------------------------------------------------------- References cited-____------------------------------------------------------- ILLUSTRATIONS PLATE In 1. Map of Anchorage showing effects of earthquake on water levels in wells- - _ - - - - - - porket FIGURES 1-5. H y drographs: Page 1. Anchorage streams--______------~--------------- B3 2. Well Anc 316B_-______-----__~~---~---------6 3. Five Anchorage-area wells- - _ _ _ _ __-___ __------------ ---- - --------- 7 4. Two wells east of Anchorage and graph of city pumpage ___----____--- 8 5. A well near Anchorage in Tertiary strata-- - -_-----..-_--------------10 6. Map showing artesian-pressure changes at Anchorage __-___-----____--..-------11 7. Knik Arm bottom changes--- .......................................... 12 8. Hydrographs of pore pressures versus water levels----------..----------------- 14 9. Hydrographs of piezometer observations- - - ................................. 15 10. Map showing relative subsidence at Anchorage ........................... -16 THE ALASKA EARTHQUAKE, MARCH 27,1964: EFFECTS ON THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMEN EFFECTS OF THE MARCH 1964 ALASKA EARTHQUAKE ON THE HYDROLOGY OF THE ANCHORAGE AREA, ALASKA By Roger M. Waller ABSTRACT The Anchorage hydrologic system Water supplies were disrupted tem- slides. Measurements after the earth- was greatly affected by the seismic porarily by snowslides on streams and quake indicate that most pore pressures shock. Immediate but temporary ef- by sanding or turbidity in wells. Salt- are declining, whereas some remain fects included increased stream dis- water encroachment to wells on Fire high or are increasing. charge, seiche action on lakes, and Island seems to have increased. The Subsidence in the area was caused fluctuations in ground-water levels. approximate 3.7-foot lowering of land principally by tectonic readjustment, Generally, ground-water levels were level and the diminished artesian but differential compaction within the residually lowered after the initial head may permit further salt-water Bootlegger Cove Chy contributed to period of fluctuation. This lowering is encroachment. subsidences estimated to be as much as attributed either to changes in the dis- Increased pore pressure in the Pleis- 0.6 foot beneath Anchorage. charge zones offshore or to a change in tocene Bootlegger Cove Clay led to the permeability of the aquifers by liquefaction in silt and sand lenses that seismically induced strain. 'contributed to the disastrous bluff land- INTRODUCTION The earthquake occurred at been conducting water-resources Bootlegger Cove Clay, of Pleis- 5 :36 p.m. Alaska standard time studies in the Anchorage area for tocene age, \\-ere initiated by and lasted about 6 minutes; the about 15 years. A network of ob- Shannon and Wilson and were epicenter was located in Prince servation wells and stream-gaging continued by the Geological Sur- William Sound. The main shock stations provided preearthquake vey. The writer is indebted to the was of Richter magnitude 8.4-8.6. control for assessing the effects of District Engineer, U.S. Army During the main shock, and pos- the earthquake. The number and Corps of Engineers, for coopera- sibly during some of the earlier frequency of observations were tion in making those further aftershocks, about 40,000 square increased for a time after the studies possible. The well-dam- miles of land, including the earthquake. Anchorage area, was lowered from Information on hydrologic con- age and water-loss data were col- a fraction of a foot to as much as ditions in and near the disastrous lected by L. L. Dearborn; his 8 feet, and about 25,000 square landslides along the Anchorage results and interpretations are in- miles of land was raised from a bluffs was obtained during a soils corporated in a following sec- fraction of a foot to as much as study reported by Shannon and tion. A description of the general 33 feet (Plafker, 1965). Wilson, Inc. (1964). Measure- earthquake effects at Anchorage The Geological Survey has ments of pore pressures in the was given by Hansen (1965). B1 ALASKA EARTHQUAKE, MARCH 27, 1964 CHANGES IN THE HYDROLOGIC SYSTEM STREAMS creased abruptly and reached a Ground water in glacial deposits, The Anchorage streams were in plateau at about 50 cfs. This rate as well as in the bedrock, provides their annual period of low flow of flow was maintained for about the base flow for the streams and were ice covered at the time 6 weeks, and then discharge in- throughout most of the winter. of the earthquake. The ground creased normally as a result of 'l'he intense ground movement waves and the oscillations of water increasing snowmelt in the moun- probably fractured the frost cover in the shallow streams broke the tains. The earthquake therefore and compacted streambeds, and ice cover. Water and sediment temporarily increased the rate of thereby released ground water to were ejected at some places, par- discharge by about 200 percent the streams. Similar increases ticularly along the tidal reach of until the normal discharge pattern were noted in streams draining each stream, as the confined water was resumed. areas affected by an underground was subjected to pulsating seismic Discharge records of the South nuclear detonation in Mississippi waves. Fork Campbell Creek show nearly (C. P. Humphreys, Jr., and R. E. Snow and rock avalanches oc- the same pattern (fig. 1) as that Taylor, written commun., 1965). curred in the headwaters of each for Ship Creek. Preearthquake The major cause of increased dis- stream rising in the Chugach discharge records for South Fork charge in both places probably is Mountains, but only one slide is Campbell Creek are not as de- compaction of near-surface sedi- known to have affected the stream- pendable as those for Ship Creek, ments which releases water from flow. A snowslide on Ship Creek but the increased flow related to the unconfined aquifer. about 3 miles upstream from the the earthquake apparently was be- Chester Creek, a stream that lowland temporarily dammed the tween 20 and 25 cfs. The plateau rises in the lowland (fig. 6), dis- stream. In a short time the stream on the discharge hydrograph is played a postearthquake discharge had cut through the slide, but the similar to that of Ship Creek, and pattern somewhat different from temporary stoppage of flow had was maintained for about 6 weeks that of Ship and Campbell Creeks. depleted the reservoir at the diver- until snowmelt greatly increased The preearthquake discharge had sion dam downstream (fig. 6). the discharge. Differences be- been about 12 cfs for more than a Within a few hours after the tween the Campbell Creek and month; on March 31, when the earthquake, all the water behind Ship Creek hydrographs probably first information was obtained the dam was diverted to the mili- are dependent, at least in part, after the earthquake, the flow was tary and city distribution systems. upon locations of the gaging sta- 4 cfs but apparently was increas- Because of this complete diversion, tions (pl. 1). The South Fork ing. The stream either lost water no water flowed over the diversion Campbell Creek gage is more than from its channel after the earth- dam until the afternoon of March 2 miles from the mountains, and quake,
Recommended publications
  • Recommendations
    RECOMMENDATIONS . 7-1 Anchorage Metropolitan Area Transportation Solutions 2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan 7-2 . A Call to Action . 7-3 Anchorage Metropolitan Area Transportation Solutions 2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan 7-4 7-5 Anchorage Metropolitan Area Transportation Solutions 2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan 7-6 Roads Scoring Points Criterion 0 1 3 5 Some preliminary Final engineering design and/or ROW purchased; Project readiness No work started completed or environmental ready to construct nearing completion work complete Needed in short Needed in short term (2011- term—helps to Can wait until Long-term need 2023)— addresses Timing of need complete grid beyond 2035 (2023-2035) major system or improves safety/capacity facility to standards needs Next logical or final Logical sequencing N/A New project N/A phase of an existing road Functional classification Local Collector Arterial/expressway Freeway Number of modes (automobile, pedestrian, bike, transit, freight Single Two Three Four or more or intermodal) 1st quartile Cost/length/AADT 4th quartile 3rd quartile 2nd quartile (highest score) AADT = Annual Average Daily Traffic N/A = not applicable 7-7 Anchorage Metropolitan Area Transportation Solutions 2035 Metropolitan Transportation Plan 7-8 Criterion Scoring Points 2010 Cost Cost/ Project Project Timing of Logical Functional Multi-modal Project Name Project Location Estimate Length/ Total Number Readiness Need Sequencing Classification Function ($ million) AADT Seward Hwy - Dimond Blvd Dimond Blvd to Dowling 101
    [Show full text]
  • Chester Creek Watershed Plan (Draft)
    Prepared for: The Municipal Planning Department and Watershed Management Services 1 Prepared by: Anchorage Waterways Council Rev. 4, September 2014 (Draft) Table of Contents Executive Summary...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Importance of Watershed Planning .................................................................................................................................................................. 8 Regulations and Plans ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 2 Creation of the Plan................................................................................................................................................................................................ 10 History of the Plan and Participants ...............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1964 Great Alaska Earthquake—A Photographic Tour of Anchorage, Alaska
    1964 Great Alaska Earthquake—A Photographic Tour of Anchorage, Alaska Open-File Report 2014–1086 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Comparison photographs taken from the same location on 4th Avenue looking east through the intersection with C Street, Anchorage, Alaska. (Top photograph taken by U.S. Army, 1964; bottom photograph taken by Robert G. McGimsey, 2013) 1964 Great Alaska Earthquake—A Photographic Tour of Anchorage, Alaska By Evan E. Thoms, Peter J. Haeussler, Rebecca D. Anderson, and Robert G. McGimsey Open-File Report 2014–1086 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2014 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Suggested citation: Thoms, E.E., Haeussler, P.J., Anderson, R.D., and McGimsey, R.G., 2014, 1964 Great Alaska Earthquake—A photographic tour of Anchorage, Alaska: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2014-1086, 48 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141086. ISSN 2331-1258 (online) Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Temperature Monitoring Network for Cook Inlet Salmon Streams 2008 - 2012
    STREAM TEMPERATURE MONITORING NETWORK FOR COOK INLET SALMON STREAMS 2008 - 2012 SYNTHESIS REPORT By COOK INLETKEEPER This document serves as a final project report for: Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ACWA 13-01) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (F12AC01078) Prepared by: Sue Mauger Cook Inletkeeper 3734 Ben Walters Lane Homer, AK 99603 (907) 235-4068 [email protected] www.inletkeeper.org October 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements Executive Summary ___________________________________________ 1 Background ___________________________________________ 2 Project Goals and Objectives _______________________________ 2 Methods ___________________________________________ 3 Sampling Design Temperature Data Collection Watershed Characteristics Temperature Metrics Models Climate Change Analysis Results _________________________________________________ 12 Water and Air Temperature (2008-2012) Models Climate Change Implications Discussion ___________________________________________ 24 Citations ___________________________________________ 28 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This 5-year synthesis would not have been possible without the contributions of Dr. Dan Rinella and Becky Shaftel with the University of Alaska Anchorage – Alaska Natural Heritage Program, Jason Leppi with The Wilderness Society, and Branden Bornemann with the Kenai Watershed Forum. Their insights, time and talents were invaluable. Special thanks to Marcus Geist, The Nature Conservancy of Alaska; Robert Ruffner, Kenai Watershed Forum; Jeff and Gay Davis, Aquatic Restoration
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Hazards in Anchorage
    Anchorage All-Hazard Mitigation Plan October 2004 CHAPTER 4 HAZARDS IN ANCHORAGE One of the requirements of a hazard mitigation plan is that is describes the hazards that affect a jurisdiction. This chapter profiles the hazards that occur in Anchorage by identifying each hazard’s location, extent, previous occurrences, and the probability of future events. Hazard mitigation plans are also required to summarize the vulnerability to the hazards. The vulnerability information was calculated by identifying the parcels that intersect each of the hazard zones. Some notes about this method are: • Not all the hazard GIS layers used to perform this analysis cover the entire MOA. Most only include a portion of the Municipality. (Parcels could be at risk but the risk area has not been mapped and included in the GIS yet.) • The taxable value is based on 2003 MOA tax assessor data • Using the taxable Value underestimates the vulnerability because: - Some parcels, such as schools, are not taxed and therefore do not have a taxable value. - Some parcels are treated as economic units (separate parcels that are treated as 1 for tax purposes) and do not have taxable values listed. - Taxable value does not consider the value of the contents. - The taxable value is the sum on the land and building taxable values. This is different from the total taxable value listed in the tax assessor’s file because tax exemptions have been applied to those totals. • If a parcel was in multiple risk areas, the entire parcel was considered to be in the highest risk area (i.e., no partial parcels).
    [Show full text]
  • Transport on Trails: a Cyclist Typology Study of Anchorage’S Greenbelt Trails
    TRANSPORT ON TRAILS: A CYCLIST TYPOLOGY STUDY OF ANCHORAGE’S GREENBELT TRAILS Supervised Research Project Report Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Master of Urban Planning degree Submitted by: Nicolette Dent Supervised by: Ahmed El-Geneidy School of Urban Planning, McGill University May 15, 2020 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was made possible through support from the Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). Special thanks to Barrett Hedges and the Eco-Counter Montreal team for the training on counter data and project inspiration. I am grateful to the Anchorage Park Foundation, the Municipality of Anchorage Parks and Recreation and Traffic departments, and Bike Anchorage for their support of the project and assistance distributing the survey. And thank you to the enthusiastic group of Anchorage cyclists who donated their time to answer the survey questions. Many thanks to Professor Ahmed El-Geneidy, whose communication and supervision never wavered even during the most unprecedented situation. To Gladys Chan, thank you for never missing a beat. Finally, endless gratitude to my family and friends for their emotional support from all corners of the continent. 2 POLICY BRIEF THE ISSUE value the social aspects of cycling and are concerned The Municipality of Anchorage, Alaska and many local about secure bicycle parking. The typology results confirm partner organizations share a goal to increase transport the mixed utilitarian and recreational patterns seen from cycling rates in order to improve quality of life and
    [Show full text]
  • Earthquake Alaska Are We Prepared?
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY EARTHQUAKE ALASKA ARE WE PREPARED? Edited by Rodney Combellick1 Roger Head2 RandaU Updike3 Open-File Report 94-218 Prepared in cooperation with ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF GEOLOGICAL & GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS Alaska Division of Geological & 2Alaska Department of Transportation & 3U.S. Geological Survey Geophysical Surveys Public Facilities Reston, Virginia Fairbanks, Alaska Anchorage, Alaska 1994 EARTHQUAKE ALASKA ARE WE PREPARED? A conference on the status of knowledge and preparedness for earthquake hazards in Alaska November 19-20,1992 Anchorage, Alaska SPONSORED BY: U.S. Geological Survey Federal Emergency Management Agency Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities Alaska Division of Emergency Services Municipality of Anchorage ORGANIZING COMMITTEE: Roger Head (Conference Chair), Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities Rodney Combellick, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys Mike Webb, Alaska Division of Emergency Services John Aho,CH2M Hill David Cole, DOWL Engineers Robert Steward, Municipality of Anchorage EDITORS Rodney A. Combellick, Alaska Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys Roger D. Head, Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities Randall G. Updike, U.S. Geological Survey Front Cover: View of Anchorage looking east soon after the great Alaska earthquake of March 27,1964. Many homes in the Turnagain heights subdivision were destroyed
    [Show full text]
  • Water-Quality Conditions of Chester Creek, Anchorage, Alaska, 1998 2001
    Prepared as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program Water-Quality Conditions of Chester Creek, Anchorage, Alaska, 1998 2001 Scientific Investigations Report 2006-5229 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover Photograph. Chester Creek at Arctic Boulevard looking upstream (east), May 21, 2003. Photograph taken by Janet P. Curran, U.S. Geological Survey. Water-Quality Conditions of Chester Creek, Anchorage, Alaska, 1998–2001 By Roy L. Glass and Robert T. Ourso Prepared as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program Scientific Investigations Report 2006–5229 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For Additional Information: U.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, Chief Water Resources Office, 4230 University Dr., Suite 201, Anchor- age, AK 99508-4664. Information regarding the National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program is available on the Internet via the World Wide Web: http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/ For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1–888–ASK–USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Glass, Roy L., and Ourso, Robert T., 2006, Water-Quality Conditions of Chester Creek, Anchorage, Alaska, 1998–2001; U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Centennial Edition 1913 - 2013
    Key to Political Party Affiliation Designations (AIP) Alaskan Independence (L) Libertarian (D) Democrat (NP) No Party (HR) Home Rule (P) Progressive (I) Independent (PD) Progressive Democrat (ID) Independent Democrat (PHR) Progressive Home Rule (IR) Independent Republican (R) Republican Published by: The Legislative Affairs Agency State Capitol, Room 3 Juneau, AK 99801 (907) 465-3800 This publication is also available online at: http://w3.legis.state.ak.us/pubs/pubs.php ALASKA LEGISLATURE ROSTER OF MEMBERS CENTENNIAL EDITION 1913 - 2013 Also includes Delegates to and Officers of the Alaska Constitutional Convention (1955-56), Governors, and Alaska Congressional Representatives since 1913 2013 In 2012, the Alaska Legislative Celebration Commission was created when the Legislature passed Senate Concurrent Resolution 24. Seven Alaskans were named to the Commission which organized events to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the First Territorial Legislature: two senators, two representatives and three members of the public. In addition, the Commission includes two alternate members, one from the Senate and another from the House of Representatives. The Alaska Legislative Centennial Commission consists of the following members: Senator Gary Stevens, Chair Senator Lyman Hoffman Representative Mike Chenault Representative Bill Stoltze Member Member Member Terrence Cole Rick Halford Clem V. Tillion Public Member Public Member Public Member Senator Anna Fairclough Representative Cathy Muñoz Alternate Member Alternate Member FORWARD Many staff and Legislators have been involved in creating this Centennial Edition of our annual Roster of Members. I want to thank all of them for their hard work and willingness to go beyond expectations. We have had nearly 800 individual Legislators in the past 100 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledging Landscape: Walking Paths Towards Indigenous Urbanism
    Acknowledging Landscape: Walking Paths Towards Indigenous Urbanism Melanie M Hess A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Landscape Architecture University of Washington 2021 Committee: Jeffrey Hou Nancy Rottle Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Department of Landscape Architecture ©Copyright 2021 University of Washington Melanie M. Hess Abstract Acknowledging Landscape: Walking Paths Towards Indigenous Urbanism Melanie M. Hess Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Jeffrey Hou Department of Landscape Architecture In North America, all cities have beneath them Indigenous land and are set within Indigenous landscapes, and yet this connection is rarely explicit in the physical environment. Much of urban development has been constructed as part of the settler colonial project that has sought to replace Indigenous land tenure through destruction of Indigenous lifeways on the landscape, in order to build something new as settler colonialism has always destroyed to replace (Wolfe 2006). But the lands on which cities reside continue to remain Indigenous lands so long as Indigenous people continue to relate to them. Landscape architecture as a field and discipline works with the land as its medium, and yet the discipline has yet to truly acknowledge the implications of Indigenous tenure on the lands on which they work and shape in North America, and have failed to examine the discipline’s role in the settler colonial project. As a student of landscape architecture and an Indigenous person, I have sought to first situate myself in the lands I live in as a visitor as a first step in acknowledgement of Indigenous lands and people of Dgheyey Kaq’ as a means to interrupt the dominant narratives of the history of our cities.
    [Show full text]
  • HHH Collections Management Database V8.0
    LANIE FLEISCHER CHESTER CREEK TRAIL HALS AK-8 (Chester Creek Trail) HALS AK-8 The Lanie Fleischer Chester Creek Trail follows the course of Chester Creek for four miles between Westchester Lagoon and Goose Lake Park. The area is generally bounded by 15 th Avenue to the north, Bragaw Street to the east, Northern Lights Boulevard to the south, and the Alaska Railroad tracks to the west. Anchorage Anchorage Alaska WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN LANDSCAPES SURVEY National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 HISTORIC AMERICAN LANDSCAPES SURVEY LANIE FLEISCHER CHESTER CREEK TRAIL (Chester Creek Trail) HALS NO. AK-8 Location: The Lanie Fleischer Chester Creek Trail follows the course of Chester Creek for four miles between Westchester Lagoon and Goose Lake Park. The area is generally bounded by 15th Avenue to the north, Bragaw Street to the east, Northern Lights Boulevard to the south, and the Alaska Railroad tracks to the west. Municipality of Anchorage, Alaska The trail passes through Margaret Egan Sullivan Park, Valley of the Moon Park, Mulcahy Park, Charles Smith Memorial Park, Eastchester Park, Tikishla Park, and Goose Lake Park, a nearly continuous string of parks comprising the Chester Creek Greenbelt. Chester Creek is the southern boundary of the Historic Preservation Plan for Anchorage’s Original Four Neighborhoods, adopted by the Anchorage Assembly on February 12, 2013. Latitude: 61.208611, Longitude: -149.9225 (west end of trail at Westchester Lagoon, Google Earth, Simple Cylindrical Projection, WGS84). Latitude: 61.196944, Longitude: -149.821389 (east end of trail at Goose Lake Park, Google Earth, Simple Cylindrical Projection, WGS84).
    [Show full text]
  • Chester Creek, University Lake, and Westchester Lagoon, Anchorage, Alaska
    Total Maximum Daily Load for Fecal Coliform in Chester Creek, University Lake, and Westchester Lagoon, Anchorage, Alaska FINAL Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 555 Cordova Street Anchorage , Alaska 99501 May 2005 This page is intentionally left blank Fecal Coliform TMDL Chester Creek Watershed CONTENTS Executive Summary.....................................................................................................................................ix 1.0 Description of the Watershed and Waterbodies................................................................................1 1.1 Location.......................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Population....................................................................................................................................3 1.3 Topography..................................................................................................................................4 1.4 Land Cover..................................................................................................................................4 1.5 Climate ........................................................................................................................................8 1.6 Hydrology....................................................................................................................................9 2.0 Water Quality Standards, TMDL Target and Area of Coverage ....................................................11
    [Show full text]