Erik Nelson, Driss

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Erik Nelson, Driss Editors: Heather Tallis, Taylor Ricketts, Anne Guerry, Spencer Wood, and Richard Sharp. Contributing Authors: Erik Nelson, Driss Ennaanay, Stacie Wolny, Nasser Olwero, Kari Vigerstol, Derric Penning- ton, Guillermo Mendoza, Juliann Aukema, John Foster, Jessica Forrest, Dick Cameron, Katie Arkema, Eric Lonsdorf, Christina Kennedy, Gregory Verutes, Chong-Ki Kim, Gregory Guannel, Michael Papenfus, Jodie Toft, Matthew Mar- sik, Joey Bernhardt, Robert Griffin, Kathryn Glowinski, Nicholas Chaumont, Adam Perelman, and Martin Lacayo. Citation: Tallis, H.T., Ricketts, T., Guerry, A.D., Wood, S.A., Sharp, R., Nelson, E., Ennaanay, D., Wolny, S., Olwero, N., Vigerstol, K., Pennington, D., Mendoza, G., Aukema, J., Foster, J., Forrest, J., Cameron, D., Arkema, K., Lonsdorf, E., Kennedy, C., Verutes, G., Kim, C.K., Guannel, G., Papenfus, M., Toft, J., Marsik, M., Bernhardt, J., and Griffin, R., Glowinski, K., Chaumont, N., Perelman, A., Lacayo, M. 2013. InVEST 2.5.6 User’s Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford. i CONTENTS I Front-matter1 1 Data Requirements and Outputs Summary Table2 2 The Need for a New Tool 8 2.1 Introduction...............................................8 2.2 Who should use InVEST?........................................8 2.3 Introduction to InVEST.........................................9 2.4 A work in progress............................................ 11 2.5 This guide................................................ 11 3 Getting Started 13 3.1 Getting started with InVEST....................................... 13 3.2 Installing the InVEST tool and data on your computer......................... 13 3.3 Downloading and installing Python library extensions......................... 13 3.4 Adding the InVEST toolbox to ArcMap................................. 14 3.5 Using sample data............................................ 15 3.6 Formatting your data........................................... 15 3.7 Running the models........................................... 16 3.8 Support information........................................... 17 3.9 Model run checklist........................................... 19 3.10 Reporting errors............................................. 19 3.11 Working with the DEM......................................... 19 3.12 Resources................................................. 22 II Marine Models 23 4 Wave Energy Model 24 4.1 Summary................................................. 24 4.2 Introduction............................................... 24 4.3 The model................................................ 25 4.4 Data needs................................................ 29 4.5 Running the model............................................ 32 4.6 Interpreting results............................................ 35 4.7 Case example illustrating results..................................... 38 4.8 Appendix A............................................... 41 4.9 Wave Energy 3.0 Beta.......................................... 41 4.10 References................................................ 42 ii 5 Wind Energy Model 43 5.1 Summary................................................. 43 5.2 Introduction............................................... 43 5.3 The model................................................ 44 5.4 Data Needs................................................ 53 5.5 Interpreting Results........................................... 54 5.6 Data Sources............................................... 55 5.7 Running the Model............................................ 55 5.8 References................................................ 56 6 Coastal Vulnerability Model 57 6.1 Summary................................................. 57 6.2 Introduction............................................... 57 6.3 The model................................................ 58 6.4 Limitations and Simplifications..................................... 64 6.5 Data needs................................................ 64 6.6 Running the model............................................ 70 6.7 Interpreting results............................................ 74 6.8 Appendix A............................................... 76 6.9 Appendix B................................................ 76 6.10 References................................................ 82 7 Erosion Protection Model 84 7.1 Summary................................................. 84 7.2 Introduction............................................... 84 7.3 The model................................................ 85 7.4 Limitations and Simplifications..................................... 97 7.5 Data Needs................................................ 99 7.6 Running the model............................................ 114 7.7 Interpreting results............................................ 121 7.8 References................................................ 126 7.9 Appendix A............................................... 127 8 Marine Fish Aquaculture 132 8.1 Summary................................................. 132 8.2 Introduction............................................... 132 8.3 The Model................................................ 133 8.4 Limitations and simplifications..................................... 135 8.5 Data needs................................................ 136 8.6 Running the model............................................ 138 8.7 Interpreting results............................................ 142 8.8 References................................................ 145 9 Aesthetic Quality 146 9.1 Summary................................................. 146 9.2 Introduction............................................... 146 9.3 The model................................................ 147 9.4 Limitations and simplifications..................................... 148 9.5 Data needs................................................ 148 9.6 Running the model............................................ 149 9.7 Interpreting results............................................ 154 9.8 Case example illustrating results..................................... 155 9.9 References................................................ 159 10 Overlap Analysis Model 160 iii 10.1 Summary................................................. 160 10.2 Introduction............................................... 160 10.3 The model................................................ 161 10.4 Limitations and simplifications..................................... 162 10.5 Data needs................................................ 163 10.6 Interpreting results............................................ 166 10.7 Appendix A............................................... 167 10.8 References................................................ 169 11 Habitat Risk Assessment 170 11.1 Summary................................................. 170 11.2 Introduction............................................... 170 11.3 The model................................................ 172 11.4 Data Needs................................................ 179 11.5 Interpreting results............................................ 186 11.6 References................................................ 190 12 Marine Water Quality Model: Advection-Diffusion Model 191 12.1 Summary................................................. 191 12.2 Introduction............................................... 191 12.3 The model................................................ 192 12.4 Limitations and simplifications..................................... 195 12.5 Data Needs................................................ 195 12.6 Running the Model............................................ 196 12.7 Interpreting Results........................................... 196 12.8 Case example illustrating model inputs and results........................... 196 12.9 References................................................ 200 III Terrestrial and Freshwater Models 201 13 Biodiversity: Habitat Quality & Rarity 202 13.1 Summary................................................. 202 13.2 Introduction............................................... 202 13.3 The Model................................................ 203 13.4 Data needs................................................ 209 13.5 Running the Model............................................ 212 13.6 Interpreting Results........................................... 214 13.7 Biodiversity 3.0 Beta........................................... 216 13.8 References................................................ 216 14 Carbon Storage and Sequestration 218 14.1 Summary................................................. 218 14.2 Introduction............................................... 218 14.3 The Model................................................ 219 14.4 Data needs................................................ 224 14.5 Running the Model............................................ 232 14.6 Interpreting Results........................................... 234 14.7 Appendix: data sources......................................... 236 14.8 Carbon 3.0 Beta............................................. 241 14.9 References................................................ 241 15 Reservoir Hydropower Production 246 15.1 Summary................................................. 246 15.2 Introduction............................................... 246 iv 15.3 The Model................................................ 247 15.4 Data needs................................................ 251 15.5 Running
Recommended publications
  • Renewable Energy in Small Islands
    Renewable Energy on Small Islands Second edition august 2000 Sponsored by: Renewable Energy on Small Islands Second Edition Author: Thomas Lynge Jensen, Forum for Energy and Development (FED) Layout: GrafiCO/Ole Jensen, +45 35 36 29 43 Cover photos: Upper left: A 55 kW wind turbine of the Danish island of Aeroe. Photo provided by Aeroe Energy and Environmental Office. Middle left: Solar water heaters on the Danish island of Aeroe. Photo provided by Aeroe Energy and Environmental Office. Upper right: Photovoltaic installation on Marie Galante Island, Guadeloupe, French West Indies. Photo provided by ADEME Guadeloupe. Middle right: Waiah hydropower plant on Hawaii-island. Photo provided by Energy, Resource & Technology Division, State of Hawaii, USA Lower right: Four 60 kW VERGNET wind turbines on Marie Galante Island, Guadeloupe, French West Indies. Photo provided by ADEME Guadeloupe. Printing: Vesterkopi Printing cover; Green Graphic No. printed: 200 ISBN: 87-90502-03-5 Copyright (c) 2000 by Forum for Energy and Development (FED) Feel free to use the information in the report, but please state the source. Renewable Energy on Small Islands – Second Edition August 2000 Table of Contents Table of Contents Foreword and Acknowledgements by the Author i Introduction iii Executive Summary v 1. The North Atlantic Ocean Azores (Portugal) 1 Canary Island (Spain) 5 Cape Verde 9 Faeroe Islands (Denmark) 11 Madeira (Portugal) 13 Pellworm (Germany) 17 St. Pierre and Miquelon (France) 19 2. The South Atlantic Ocean Ascension Island (UK) 21 St. Helena Island (UK) 23 3. The Baltic Sea Aeroe (Denmark) 25 Gotland (Sweden) 31 Samsoe (Denmark) 35 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Generation Data for European Energy System Analysis
    Renewable Generation Data for European Energy System Analysis Alexander Kies1, Bruno U. Schyska2, Mariia Bilousova1;3, Omar El Sayed1;3, Jakub Jurasz4;5;6, Horst Stoecker1;3;7 1Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Ruth-Moufang-Str. 1, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany 2German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Networked Energy Systems, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Straße 15, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany 3Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany 4Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland 5Faculty of Management, AGH University, 30-059 Cracow, Poland 6School of Business, Society and Engineering, M¨alardalens H¨ogskola,72113 V¨aster˚as, Sweden 7GSI Helmholtzzentrum f¨urSchwerionenforschung, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany Abstract In the process of decarbonization, the global energy mix is shifting from fossil fuels to renewables. To study decarbonization pathways, large-scale energy system models are utilized. These models require accurate data on renewable generation to develop their full potential. Using different data can lead to conflicting results and policy advice. In this work, we compare several datasets that are commonly used to study the transition towards highly renewable European power system. We find significant differences between these datasets and cost-difference of about 10% result in the different energy mix. We conclude that much more attention must be paid to the large uncertainties of the input data. Keywords: Energy System Analysis, Renewable Generation Data, Energy arXiv:2101.08741v1 [physics.soc-ph] 21 Jan 2021 Meteorology, MERRA-2, ERA5, renewables.ninja, EMHires Preprint submitted to Journal Name January 22, 2021 1. Introduction Sustainable energy sources are a major solution for the imminent thread of climate change [1, 2].
    [Show full text]
  • Power and Wind Shear Implications of Large Wind Turbine Scenarios in the US Central Plains
    energies Article Power and Wind Shear Implications of Large Wind Turbine Scenarios in the US Central Plains Rebecca J. Barthelmie 1,* , Tristan J. Shepherd 2 , Jeanie A. Aird 1 and Sara C. Pryor 2 1 Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; [email protected] (T.J.S.); [email protected] (S.C.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 13 July 2020; Accepted: 11 August 2020; Published: 18 August 2020 Abstract: Continued growth of wind turbine physical dimensions is examined in terms of the implications for wind speed, power and shear across the rotor plane. High-resolution simulations with the Weather Research and Forecasting model are used to generate statistics of wind speed profiles for scenarios of current and future wind turbines. The nine-month simulations, focused on the eastern Central Plains, show that the power scales broadly as expected with the increase in rotor diameter (D) and wind speeds at hub-height (H). Increasing wind turbine dimensions from current values (approximately H = 100 m, D = 100 m) to those of the new International Energy Agency reference wind turbine (H = 150 m, D = 240 m), the power across the rotor plane increases 7.1 times. The mean domain-wide wind shear exponent (α) decreases from 0.21 (H = 100 m, D = 100 m) to 0.19 for the largest wind turbine scenario considered (H = 168 m, D = 248 m) and the frequency of extreme positive shear (α > 0.2) declines from 48% to 38% of 10-min periods.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.8.5.Post0+Ug.Gdd887c5.D20201118
    InVEST User’s Guide, Release 3.8.5.post0+ug.gdd887c5.d20201118 InVEST User’s Guide Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs Version 3.8.5.post0+ug.gdd887c5.d20201118 Editors: Richard Sharp, James Douglass, Stacie Wolny. Contributing Authors: Katie Arkema, Joey Bernhardt, Will Bierbower, Nicholas Chaumont, Douglas Denu, James Douglass, David Fisher, Kathryn Glowinski, Robert Griffin, Gregory Guannel, Anne Guerry, Justin Johnson, Perrine Hamel, Christina Kennedy, Chong-Ki Kim, Martin Lacayo, Eric Lonsdorf, Lisa Mandle, Lauren Rogers, Richard Sharp, Jodie Toft, Gregory Verutes, Adrian L. Vogl, Stacie Wolny, Spencer Wood. Citation: Sharp, R., Douglass, J., Wolny, S., Arkema, K., Bernhardt, J., Bierbower, W., Chaumont, N., Denu, D., Fisher, D., Glowinski, K., Griffin, R., Guannel, G., Guerry, A., Johnson, J., Hamel, P., Kennedy, C., Kim, C.K., Lacayo, M., Lonsdorf, E., Mandle, L., Rogers, L., Toft, J., Verutes, G., Vogl, A. L., and Wood, S. 2020, InVEST 3.8.5.post0+ug.gdd887c5.d20201118 User’s Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund. 1 InVEST User’s Guide, Release 3.8.5.post0+ug.gdd887c5.d20201118 2 CONTENTS 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Data Requirements and Outputs Summary Table............................5 1.2 Why we need tools to map and value ecosystem services........................5 1.2.1 Introduction...........................................5 1.2.2 Who should use InVEST?...................................5 1.2.3 Introduction to InVEST..................................... 10 1.2.4 Using InVEST to Inform Decisions.............................. 12 1.2.5 A work in progress....................................... 15 1.2.6 This guide............................................ 15 1.3 Getting Started.............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Power Prediction Model Based on Publicly Available Data: Sensitivity Analysis on Roughness and Production Trend
    WIND POWER PREDICTION MODEL BASED ON PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DATA: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ON ROUGHNESS AND PRODUCTION TREND Dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE WITH A MAJOR IN WIND POWER PROJECT MANAGEMENT Uppsala University Campus Gotland Department of Earth Sciences Gireesh Sakthi [10th December, 2019] WIND POWER PREDICTION MODEL BASED ON PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DATA: SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS ON ROUGHNESS AND PRODUCTION TREND Dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE WITH A MAJOR IN WIND POWER PROJECT MANAGEMENT Uppsala University Campus Gotland Department of Earth Sciences Approved by Supervisor, Dr. Karl Nilsson Examiner, Dr. Stefan Ivanell 10th December, 2019 II Abstract The wind power prediction plays a vital role in a wind power project both during the planning and operational phase of a project. A time series based wind power prediction model is introduced and the simulations are run for different case studies. The prediction model works based on the input from 1) nearby representative wind measuring station 2) Global average wind speed value from Meteorological Institute Uppsala University mesoscale model (MIUU) 3) Power curve of the wind turbine. The measured wind data is normalized to minimize the variation in the wind speed and multiplied with the MIUU to get a distributed wind speed. The distributed wind speed is then used to interpolate the wind power with the help of the power curve of the wind turbine. The interpolated wind power is then compared with the Actual Production Data (APD) to validate the prediction model. The simulation results show that the model works fairly predicting the Annual Energy Production (AEP) on monthly averages for all sites but the model could not follow the APD trend on all cases.
    [Show full text]
  • The CLIMIX Model a Tool to Create and Evaluate Spatially-Resolved
    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 42 (2015) 1–15 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rser The CLIMIX model: A tool to create and evaluate spatially-resolved scenarios of photovoltaic and wind power development S. Jerez a,b,n, F. Thais c, I. Tobin a, M. Wild d, A. Colette e, P. Yiou a, R. Vautard a a Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement (LSCE), IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France b Department of Physics, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain c Institut de Technico-Economie des Systèmes Energétiques (I-Tésé), CEA/DEN/DANS, 91191 Gif sur Yvette, France d Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland e Institut National de l’Environnement Industriel et des Risques (INERIS), Parc Technologique Alata, 60550 Verneuil en Halatte, France article info abstract Article history: Renewable energies arise as part of both economic development plans and mitigation strategies aimed Received 16 April 2014 at abating climate change. Contrariwise, most renewable energies are potentially vulnerable to climate Received in revised form change, which could affect in particular solar and wind power. Proper evaluations of this two-way 5 August 2014 climate–renewable energy relationship require detailed information of the geographical location of the Accepted 26 September 2014 renewable energy fleets. However, this information is usually provided as total amounts installed per administrative region, especially with respect to future planned installations. To help overcome this Keywords: limiting issue, the objective of this contribution was to develop the so-called CLIMIX model: a tool that Wind power performs a realistic spatial allocation of given amounts of both photovoltaic (PV) and wind power Solar photovoltaic power installed capacities and evaluates the energy generated under varying climate conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelo Para a Formatação Dos Artigos a Serem Submetidos À Revista Gestão Industrial
    PERMANENT GREEN ENERGY PRODUCTION Relly Victoria V. Petrescu1, Aversa Raffaella2, Apicella Antonio2; Florian Ion T. Petrescu1 1ARoTMM-IFToMM, Bucharest Polytechnic University, Bucharest, 060042 (CE) Romania [email protected]; [email protected] 2Advanced Material Lab, Department of Architecture and Industrial Design, Second University of Naples, Naples 81031 (CE) Italy [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract After 1950, began to appear nuclear fission plants. The fission energy was a necessary evil. In this mode it stretched the oil life, avoiding an energy crisis. Even so, the energy obtained from oil represents about 60% of all energy used. At this rate of use of oil, it will be consumed in about 60 years. Today, the production of energy obtained by nuclear fusion is not yet perfect prepared. But time passes quickly. We must rush to implement of the additional sources of energy already known, but and find new energy sources. Green energy in 2010-2015 managed a spectacular growth worldwide of about 5%. The most difficult obstacle met in worldwide was the inconstant green energy produced. Key-words: environmental protection, green energy, wind power, hydropower, pumped-storage. 1. Introduction Energy development is the effort to provide sufficient primary energy sources and secondary energy forms for supply, cost, impact on air pollution and water pollution, mitigation of climate change with renewable energy. Technologically advanced societies have become increasingly dependent on external energy sources for transportation, the production of many manufactured goods, and the delivery of energy services (Aversa et al., 2017 a-e, 2016 a-o; Petrescu et al., 2017, 2016 a-e).
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Location Optimisation of Wind and Solar Photovoltaic Power Capacity in South Africa Using Mean- Variance Portfolio Theory and Time Series Clustering
    Geographical Location Optimisation of Wind and Solar Photovoltaic Power Capacity in South Africa using Mean- variance Portfolio Theory and Time Series Clustering By Christiaan Johannes Joubert Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of Engineering in Electrical Engineering at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof. H.J. Vermeulen Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering November 2016 Declaration By submitting this thesis/dissertation electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. C.J. Joubert November 2016 Copyright © 2016 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved i Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following people for their contribution during this project: My study leader, Prof H.J. Vermeulen, for his valuable guidance and inputs throughout my two years at Stellenbosch University. Thanks are also due to Prof H.J. Vermeulen’s family who opened up their home to the crowd of master’s students and their circle of friends on many occasions. My mother, Marina Joubert, father, Stefan Joubert, brother, Peter Joubert, aunt, Juanita Du Toit, grandmother, Irene Du Toit, as well as my late grandparents Pieter du Toit, Chris Joubert and Rita Joubert. To the extent that I have achieved anything in my life it would undoubtedly not have been possible without their unwavering love, sacrifice and support.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1703.06553V1 [Physics.Flu-Dyn]
    An entrainment model for fully-developed wind farms: effects of atmospheric stability and an ideal limit for wind farm performance Paolo Luzzatto-Fegiza1 and Colm-cille P. Caulfieldb,c a Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA b BP Institute for Multiphase Flow, Madingley Rise, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0EZ, UK c Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Rd, CB3 0WA, UK Abstract While a theoretical limit has long been established for the performance of a single turbine, no corresponding upper bound exists for the power output from a large wind farm, making it difficult to evaluate the available potential for further performance gains. Recent work involving vertical-axis turbines has achieved large increases in power density relative to traditional wind farms (Dabiri, J.O., J. Renew. Sust. Energy 3, 043104 (2011)), thereby adding motivation to the search for an upper bound. Here we build a model describing the essential features of a large array of turbines with arbitrary design and layout, by considering a fully-developed wind farm whose upper edge is bounded by a self-similar boundary layer. The exchanges between the wind farm, the overlaying boundary layer, and the outer flow are parameterized by means of the classical entrainment hypothesis. We obtain a concise expression for the wind farm’s power density (corresponding to power output per unit planform area), as a function of three coefficients, which represent the array thrust and the turbulent exchanges at each of the two interfaces. Before seeking an upper bound on farm performance, we assess the performance of our simple model by comparing the predicted power density to field data, laboratory measurements and large-eddy simulations for the fully-developed regions of wind farms, finding good agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Characteristics and Mapping of Near-Surface and Elevated Wind Resources in the Middle East
    Statistical characteristics and mapping of near-surface and elevated wind resources in the Middle East Dissertation by Chak Man Andrew Yip In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia November, 2018 2 EXAMINATION COMMITTEE PAGE The dissertation of Chak Man Andrew Yip is approved by the examination committee Committee Chairperson: Georgiy L. Stenchikov Committee Members: Marc G. Genton, Gerard T. Schuster, Kristopher B. Kar- nauskas 3 ©November, 2018 Chak Man Andrew Yip All Rights Reserved 4 ABSTRACT Statistical characteristics and mapping of near-surface and elevated wind resources in the Middle East Chak Man Andrew Yip Wind energy is expected to contribute to alleviating the rise in energy demand in the Middle East that is driven by population growth and industrial development. However, variability and intermittency in the wind resource present significant chal- lenges to grid integration of wind energy systems. The first chapter addresses the issues in current wind resource assessment in the Middle East due to sparse meteorological observations with varying record lengths. The wind field with consistent space-time resolution for over three decades at three hub heights over the whole Arabian Peninsula is constructed using the Modern Era Retrospective-Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) dataset. The wind resource is assessed at a higher spatial resolution with metrics of temporal variations in the wind than in prior studies. Previously unrecognized locations of interest with high wind abundance and low variability and intermittency have been identified in this study and confirmed by recent on-site observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Access Proceedings Journal of Physics
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Dec 16, 2018 Probabilistic Meteorological Characterization for Turbine Loads Kelly, Mark C.; Larsen, Gunner Chr.; Dimitrov, Nikolay Krasimirov; Natarajan, Anand Published in: Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Online) Link to article, DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/524/1/012076 Publication date: 2014 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Kelly, M. C., Larsen, G. C., Dimitrov, N. K., & Natarajan, A. (2014). Probabilistic Meteorological Characterization for Turbine Loads. Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Online), 524, [012076]. DOI: 10.1088/1742- 6596/524/1/012076 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Probabilistic Meteorological Characterization for Turbine Loads M Kelly1, G Larsen, N K Dimitrov, and A Natarajan Department of Wind Energy, Risø Campus, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde 4000, DK E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Beyond the existing, limited IEC prescription to describe fatigue loads on wind turbines, we look towards probabilistic characterization of the loads via analogous characterization of the atmospheric flow, particularly for today's "taller" turbines with rotors well above the atmospheric surface layer.
    [Show full text]
  • An Airborne Cycloidal Wind Turbine Mounted Using a Tethered Bal- Loon
    Technical Paper Int’l J. of Aeronautical & Space Sci. 12(4), 354–359 (2011) DOI:10.5139/IJASS.2011.12.4.354 An Airborne Cycloidal Wind Turbine Mounted Using a Tethered Bal- loon In Seong Hwang*, Wanggu Kang** and Seung Jo Kim*** Korea Aerospace Research Institute, Daejeon 305-333, Korea Abstract This study proposes a design for an airborne wind turbine generator. The proposed system comprises a cycloidal wind turbine adopting a cycloidal rotor blade system that is used at a high altitude. The turbine is mounted on a tethered balloon. The proposed system is relatively easier to be realized and stable. Moreover, the rotor efficiency is high, which can be adjusted using the blade pitch angle variation. In addition, the rotor is well adapted to the wind-flow direction change. This article proves the feasibility of the proposed system through a sample design for a wind turbine that produces a power of 30 kW. The generated wind power at 500 m height is nearly 3 times of that on the ground. Key words: Cycloidal wind turbine, Tethered balloon, High altitude 1. Introduction altitudes have been studied. Kim and Park (2010) proposed a parawing on ships, in which the underlying concept is Wind energy is one of the most popular renewable a tethered parafoil that pulls and tows a ship. The ship is energies in the world. However, the generation of a strong equipped with hydraulic turbines below the water line. and steady wind flow is not easy to achieve. For this purpose, Another concept is the use of controlled tethered airfoils to wind turbines are fixed on top of a tall tower; typically, in extract energy from high-altitude wind flows (Fagiano, 2009).
    [Show full text]