DOCSLIB.ORG

Case White: the Invasion of Poland 1939'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Case White: the Invasion of Poland 1939' H-Poland Biskupska on Forczyk, 'Case White: The Invasion of Poland 1939' Review published on Tuesday, July 7, 2020 Robert Forczyk. Case White: The Invasion of Poland 1939. Oxford: Osprey Publishing, 2019. Illustrations. 416 pp. $30.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-1-4728-3495-9. Reviewed by Jadwiga Biskupska (Sam Houston State University)Published on H-Poland (July, 2020) Commissioned by Anna Muller (University of Michigan - Dearborn) Printable Version: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showpdf.php?id=55304 The popularity of the recent BBC/PBS documentary series World on Fire and its sentimental portrait of Polish soldiers contesting Germans “on bicycles,” as Helen Hunt’s character repeatedly insists, demonstrates the need for a work like Robert Forczyk’s Case White: The Invasion of Poland, 1939. It promises an updated analysis of the military campaign that began the Second World War. Forczyk is the author of numerous specialized campaign studies and his Case White is deliberately revisionist, dismissing much of the Western scholarship on the Polish campaign as “lazy” and dominated by the German perspective (p. 10). Even more ambitiously, Forczyk asserts that the 1939 co-invasion of Poland by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union constituted “the greatest criminal conspiracy of the 20th century”—a bold claim considering the bloodiness of the century—and therefore demands more consideration than it has gotten (p. 7). This volume is the first book-length study in English since Steven Zaloga and Victor Madej’s illustrated The Polish Campaign 1939 (1985) and should now be considered the definitive English-language treatment, though there is a much-deeper Polish literature and source base. It covers the German and Soviet attacks on Poland and considers all branches of the German military and the combat performance of the SS, though the police atrocity campaign, Operation Tannenberg, is mentioned only in passing. The study relies on an established library of secondary sources and campaign studies, supplemented with the memoirs and diaries of participants and some archival sources on British decision-making. The maps interspersed throughout are especially useful for visualizing the campaign as a series of regional conflicts. Though the heart of the book investigates the fighting itself, the treatment begins with a brief overview of Polish military history, “Poland Is Not Lost,” followed by a very interesting chapter on how the new Polish Second Republic built an army and a military-industrial complex, and the political and economic difficulties that stunted these efforts, a chapter that should have wide interest. The central thesis in this discussion is that the Polish Army was on a successful modernization path by the late 1930s, but that this late date and limited financial means meant that reforms were incomplete at the time of the German invasion—a story of a state caught mid-reform that was not unique during the longer war. Chapters 3 and 4 consider the military and diplomatic buildup to war, outlining interwar German and Soviet military developments and the wrangling of alliances. Forczyk blames Polish military unpreparedness on Józef Piłsudski’s narrowmindedness and financial limitations, but he sees the country’s political isolation as largely the result of some combination of British indifference and hostility. Of note here is his reminder that the Germans, Poles, and Soviets all undertook Citation: H-Net Reviews. Biskupska on Forczyk, 'Case White: The Invasion of Poland 1939'. H-Poland. 07-07-2020. https://networks.h-net.org/node/9669/reviews/6239089/biskupska-forczyk-case-white-invasion-poland-1939 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-Poland politically motivated purges of their militaries during the 1930s and that these purges had far- reaching consequences. The book then provides a detailed story of the five-week war, breaking it down into its major engagements region by region, and opening with naval and air warfare but focusing primarily on the land campaigns. Though military historians now begrudge the term, it is therefore an examination of Nazi Germany’s first stab at Blitzkrieg. The heart of the book (chapters 5 and 6) is a campaign history analyzing how the Polish Army and Wehrmacht maneuvered and fought, how good their commanders’ decisions were, and how well they used the weapons they possessed. Forczyk is dismissive of Gerd von Rundstedt and thinks Heinz Guderian competent if overpraised; he considers the Polish commander in chief Edward Smigły-Rydz so bad—“disastrous” and “disgraceful”—that his men were often better off when he lost contact with them (pp. 255, 261). Chapter 7, “Apotheosis,” sandwiches a brief discussion of the Soviet invasion of eastern Poland between a two-part discussion of the siege and defense of Warsaw. Though the detail in these chapters will likely overwhelm the nonspecialist, particular attention should be paid to the sections on aerial bombardment, the Battle of the Bzura, and the fight for Warsaw. Chapter 8, “Occupation,” is not primarily about occupation but about how the fighting ended, and its opening campaign analysis should be widely useful. Forczyk passes harsh judgment on German and Polish command decisions, and also on French and British hesitation after their declarations of war. His goal is not primarily to overturn the conventional understanding of the campaign, which was that it was a decisive German victory, but to complicate that portrait by explaining that the victory was more difficult than it is generally taken to have been and that German use of air power and armor was less effective than it later became. The Polish defensive plan, which was to delay the German advance and then launch a substantial counterattack, was foiled in both aspects primarily by poor coordination among Polish units as they retreated. As a general matter, Forczyk asserts that Polish behavior—and especially the decisions of lower-level commanders—should not be dismissed outright and that some Polish actions were effective in delaying the German advance, maintaining soldiers’ morale, and creating precedents upon which later military resistance depended. Those with an interest in wartime resistance will encounter some of its major players—Kazimierz Sosnkowski, Stefan Rowecki, Tadeusz Komorowski—in their 1939 exploits. Though politics are bracketed once the fighting begins in this study, it provides context for the behavior of Polish ethnic minorities, antisemitic atrocities, and the (mis)treatment of prisoners. Wehrmacht and SS atrocities against Polish soldiers and civilians, which Forczyk details at Wieluń, Gdańsk, Bydgoszcz, Parzymiechy, Zimnowo, Bolesławiec, Częstochowa, Milejów, Ciepielów, and Modlin, are a particular theme. This volume will allow historians of the war to understand how the campaign in Poland was conducted and how later German campaigns emerged out of solutions to the mistakes of 1939. Its narrative and detailed maps, images, and appendices should be an asset to those interested in the Polish wartime experience, and a complement to the literature on antisemitic violence and police and Wehrmacht brutalization. Forczyk’s study of the collapse of Poland and the start of the Second World War is the only account available in English that considers all three opponents in the campaign. It demonstrates clearly that the Wehrmacht in 1939 was not already an institution capable of defeating France or invading the Soviet Union but that it developed from its experiences in Poland—and that it Citation: H-Net Reviews. Biskupska on Forczyk, 'Case White: The Invasion of Poland 1939'. H-Poland. 07-07-2020. https://networks.h-net.org/node/9669/reviews/6239089/biskupska-forczyk-case-white-invasion-poland-1939 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-Poland had to do so. Citation: Jadwiga Biskupska. Review of Forczyk, Robert, Case White: The Invasion of Poland 1939. H-Poland, H-Net Reviews. July, 2020. URL: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=55304 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Citation: H-Net Reviews. Biskupska on Forczyk, 'Case White: The Invasion of Poland 1939'. H-Poland. 07-07-2020. https://networks.h-net.org/node/9669/reviews/6239089/biskupska-forczyk-case-white-invasion-poland-1939 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Axis Blitzkrieg: Warsaw and Battle of Britain
    Axis Blitzkrieg: Warsaw and Battle of Britain By Skyla Gabriel and Hannah Seidl Background on Axis Blitzkrieg ● A military strategy specifically designed to create disorganization in enemy forces by logical firepower and mobility of forces ● Limits civilian casualty and waste of fire power ● Developed in Germany 1918-1939 as a result of WW1 ● Used in Warsaw, Poland in 1939, then with eventually used in Belgium, the Netherlands, North Africa, and even against the Soviet Union Hitler’s Plan and “The Night Before” ● Due to the non-aggression pact with the Soviet Union, once the Polish state was divided up, Hitler would colonize the territory and only allow the “superior race” to live there and would enslave the natives. ● On August 31, 1939 Hitler ordered Nazi S.S. troops,wearing Polish officer uniforms, to sneak into Poland. ● The troops did minor damage to buildings and equipment. ● Left dead concentration camp prisoners in Polish uniforms ● This was meant to mar the start of the Polish Invasion when the bodies were found in the morning by Polish officers Initial stages ● Initially, one of Hitler’s first acts after coming to power was to sign a nonaggression pact (January 1934) with Poland in order to avoid a French- Polish alliance before Germany could rearm. ● Through 1935- March 1939 Germany slowly gained more power through rearmament (agreed to by both France and Britain), Germany then gained back the Rhineland through militarization, annexation of Austria, and finally at the Munich Conference they were given the Sudetenland. ● Once Czechoslovakia was dismembered Britain and France responded by essentially backing Poland and Hitler responded by signing a non-aggression with the Soviet Union in the summer of 1939 ● The German-Soviet pact agreed Poland be split between the two powers, the new pact allowed Germany to attack Poland without fear of Soviet intervention The Attack ● On September 1st, 1939 Germany invaded Warsaw, Poland ● Schleswig-Holstein, a German Battleship at 4:45am began to fire on the Polish garrison in Westerplatte Fort, Danzig.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of Poland and Lithuania
    A Short History of Poland and Lithuania Chapter 1. The Origin of the Polish Nation.................................3 Chapter 2. The Piast Dynasty...................................................4 Chapter 3. Lithuania until the Union with Poland.........................7 Chapter 4. The Personal Union of Poland and Lithuania under the Jagiellon Dynasty. ..................................................8 Chapter 5. The Full Union of Poland and Lithuania. ................... 11 Chapter 6. The Decline of Poland-Lithuania.............................. 13 Chapter 7. The Partitions of Poland-Lithuania : The Napoleonic Interlude............................................................. 16 Chapter 8. Divided Poland-Lithuania in the 19th Century. .......... 18 Chapter 9. The Early 20th Century : The First World War and The Revival of Poland and Lithuania. ............................. 21 Chapter 10. Independent Poland and Lithuania between the bTwo World Wars.......................................................... 25 Chapter 11. The Second World War. ......................................... 28 Appendix. Some Population Statistics..................................... 33 Map 1: Early Times ......................................................... 35 Map 2: Poland Lithuania in the 15th Century........................ 36 Map 3: The Partitions of Poland-Lithuania ........................... 38 Map 4: Modern North-east Europe ..................................... 40 1 Foreword. Poland and Lithuania have been linked together in this history because
    [Show full text]
  • THE BRITISH ARMY in the LOW COUNTRIES, 1793-1814 By
    ‘FAIRLY OUT-GENERALLED AND DISGRACEFULLY BEATEN’: THE BRITISH ARMY IN THE LOW COUNTRIES, 1793-1814 by ANDREW ROBERT LIMM A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY. University of Birmingham School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law October, 2014. University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The history of the British Army in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars is generally associated with stories of British military victory and the campaigns of the Duke of Wellington. An intrinsic aspect of the historiography is the argument that, following British defeat in the Low Countries in 1795, the Army was transformed by the military reforms of His Royal Highness, Frederick Duke of York. This thesis provides a critical appraisal of the reform process with reference to the organisation, structure, ethos and learning capabilities of the British Army and evaluates the impact of the reforms upon British military performance in the Low Countries, in the period 1793 to 1814, via a series of narrative reconstructions. This thesis directly challenges the transformation argument and provides a re-evaluation of British military competency in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars.
    [Show full text]
  • They Fought for Independent Poland
    2019 Special edition PISMO CODZIENNE Independence Day, November 11, 2019 FREE AGAIN! THEY FOUGHT FOR INDEPENDENT POLAND Dear Readers, The day of November 11 – the National Independence Day – is not accidentally associated with the Polish military uni- form, its symbolism and traditions. Polish soldiers on almost all World War I fronts “threw on the pyre their lives’ fate.” When the Polish occupiers were drown- ing in disasters and revolutions, white- and-red flags were fluttering on Polish streets to mark Poland’s independence. The Republic of Poland was back on the map of Europe, although this was only the beginning of the battle for its bor- ders. Józef Piłsudski in his first order to the united Polish Army shared his feeling of joy with his soldiers: “I’m taking com- mand of you, Soldiers, at the time when the heart of every Pole is beating stron- O God! Thou who from on high ger and faster, when the children of our land have seen the sun of freedom in all its Hurls thine arrows at the defenders of the nation, glory.” He never promised them any bat- We beseech Thee, through this heap of bones! tle laurels or well-merited rest, though. On the contrary – he appealed to them Let the sun shine on us, at least in death! for even greater effort in their service May the daylight shine forth from heaven’s bright portals! for Poland. And they never let him down Let us be seen - as we die! when in 1920 Poland had to defend not only its own sovereignty, but also entire Europe against flooding bolshevism.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Strategy: the Blind Spot of International Humanitarian Law
    Harvard National Security Journal / Vol. 8 333 ARTICLE Military Strategy: The Blind Spot of International Humanitarian Law Yishai Beer* * Professor of Law, Herzliya Interdisciplinary Center, Herzliya, Israel. The author would like to thank Eyal Benvenisti, Gabriella Blum, Moshe Halbertal, Eliav Lieblich, David Kretzmer, and Kenneth Watkin for their useful comments, and Ohad Abrahami for his research assistance. © 2017 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College and Yishai Beer. 334 2017 / Military Strategy: The Blind Spot of International Humanitarian Law Abstract The stated agenda of international humanitarian law (IHL) is to humanize war’s arena. Since it is the strategic level of war that primarily affects war’s conduct, one might have expected that the law would focus upon it. Paradoxically, the current law generally ignores the strategic discourse and prefers to scrutinize the conduct of war through a tactical lens. This disregard of military strategy has a price that is demonstrated in the prevailing law of targeting. This Article challenges the current blind spot of IHL: its disregard of the direct consequences of war strategy and the war aims deriving from it. It asks those who want to comprehensively reduce war’s hazards to think strategically and to leverage military strategy as a constraining tool. The effect of the suggested approach is demonstrated through an analysis of targeting rules, where the restrictive attributes of military strategy, which could play a significant role in limiting targeting, have been overlooked. Harvard National Security Journal / Vol. 8 335 Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................336 I. Strategy Determines War’s Patterns and Scope .........................................340 II.
    [Show full text]
  • The Axis Advances
    wh07_te_ch17_s02_MOD_s.fm Page 568 Monday, March 12, 2007 2:32WH07MOD_se_CH17_s02_s.fm PM Page 568 Monday, January 29, 2007 6:01 PM Step-by-Step German fighter plane SECTION Instruction 2 WITNESS HISTORY AUDIO Objectives Janina’s War Story As you teach this section, keep students “ It was 10:30 in the morning and I was helping my focused on the following objectives to help mother and a servant girl with bags and baskets as them answer the Section Focus Question they set out for the market. Suddenly the high- and master core content. pitch scream of diving planes caused everyone to 2 freeze. Countless explosions shook our house ■ Describe how the Axis powers came to followed by the rat-tat-tat of strafing machine control much of Europe, but failed to guns. We could only stare at each other in horror. conquer Britain. Later reports would confirm that several German Janina Sulkowska in ■ Summarize Germany’s invasion of the the early 1930s Stukas had screamed out of a blue sky and . Soviet Union. dropped several bombs along the main street— and then returned to strafe the market. The carnage ■ Understand the horror of the genocide was terrible. the Nazis committed. —Janina Sulkowska,” Krzemieniec, Poland, ■ Describe the role of the United States September 12, 1939 before and after joining World War II. Focus Question Which regions were attacked and occupied by the Axis powers, and what was life like under their occupation? Prepare to Read The Axis Advances Build Background Knowledge L3 Objectives Diplomacy and compromise had not satisfied the Axis powers’ Remind students that the German attack • Describe how the Axis powers came to control hunger for empire.
    [Show full text]
  • August Zaleski Papers, 1919-1981
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf2s2002bg No online items Register of the August Zaleski Papers, 1919-1981 Processed by Michael Jakobson; machine-readable finding aid created by Xiuzhi Zhou Hoover Institution Archives Stanford University Stanford, California 94305-6010 Phone: (650) 723-3563 Fax: (650) 725-3445 Email: [email protected] © 1998 Hoover Institution Archives. All rights reserved. Register of the August Zaleski 80163 1 Papers, 1919-1981 Register of the August Zaleski Papers, 1919-1981 Hoover Institution Archives Stanford University Stanford, California Contact Information Hoover Institution Archives Stanford University Stanford, California 94305-6010 Phone: (650) 723-3563 Fax: (650) 725-3445 Email: [email protected] Processed by: Michael Jakobson Date Completed: 1989 Encoded by: Xiuzhi Zhou © 1998 Hoover Institution Archives. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: August Zaleski Papers, Date (inclusive): 1919-1981 Collection Number: 80163 Creator: Zaleski, August, 1883-1972 Collection Size: 29 manuscript boxes, 1 oversize box, 1 envelope (13 linear feet) Repository: Hoover Institution Archives Stanford, California 94305-6010 Abstract: Correspondence, dispatches, memoranda, and reports, relating to interwar Polish diplomacy, conditions in Poland and diplomacy regarding Poland during World War II, and postwar Polish emigre life. Physical Location: Hoover Institution Archives Language: Polish. Access Collection is open for research. The Hoover Institution Archives only allows access to copies of audiovisual items. To listen to sound recordings or to view videos or films during your visit, please contact the Archives at least two working days before your arrival. We will then advise you of the accessibility of the material you wish to see or hear. Please note that not all audiovisual material is immediately accessible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Buildup of the German War Economy: the Importance of the Nazi-Soviet Economic Agreements of 1939 and 1940 by Samantha Carl I
    The Buildup of the German War Economy: The Importance of the Nazi-Soviet Economic Agreements of 1939 and 1940 By Samantha Carl INTRODUCTION German-Soviet relations in the early half of the twentieth century have been marked by periods of rapprochement followed by increasing tensions. After World War I, where the nations fought on opposite sides, Germany and the Soviet Union focused on their respective domestic problems and tensions began to ease. During the 1920s, Germany and the Soviet Union moved toward normal relations with the signing of the Treaty of Rapallo in 1922.(1) Tensions were once again apparent after 1933, when Adolf Hitler gained power in Germany. Using propaganda and anti-Bolshevik rhetoric, Hitler depicted the Soviet Union as Germany's true enemy.(2) Despite the animosity between the two nations, the benefits of trade enabled them to maintain economic relations throughout the inter-war period. It was this very relationship that paved the way for the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact of 1939 and the subsequent outbreak of World War II. Nazi-Soviet relations on the eve of the war were vital to the war movement of each respective nation. In essence, the conclusion of the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact on August 23, 1939 allowed Germany to augment its war effort while diminishing the Soviet fear of a German invasion.(3) The betterment of relations was a carefully planned program in which Hitler sought to achieve two important goals. First, he sought to prevent a two-front war from developing upon the invasion of Poland. Second, he sought to gain valuable raw materials that were necessary for the war movement.(4) The only way to meet these goals was to pursue the completion of two pacts with the Soviet Union: an economic agreement as well as a political one.
    [Show full text]
  • Oliver Cromwell and the Siege of Drogheda
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers 2017 Just Warfare, or Genocide?: Oliver Cromwell and the Siege of Drogheda Lukas Dregne Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/utpp Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Dregne, Lukas, "Just Warfare, or Genocide?: Oliver Cromwell and the Siege of Drogheda" (2017). Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers. 175. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/utpp/175 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dregne Just Warfare, or Genocide? Just Warfare, or Genocide?: Oliver Cromwell and the Siege of Drogheda." Sir, the state, in choosing men to serve it, takes no notice of their opinions; if they be willing to serve it, that satisfies. I advised you formerly to bear with minds of different men from yourself. Take heed of being sharp against those to whom you can object little but that they square not with you in matters of religion. - Cromwell, To Major General Crawford (1643) Lukas Dregne B.A., History, Political Science University of Montana 1 Dregne Just Warfare, or Genocide? Abstract: Oliver Cromwell has always been a subject of fierce debate since his death on September 3, 1658. The most notorious stain blotting his reputation occurred during the conquest of Ireland by forces of the English Parliament under his command.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Doctrine for Campaign Planning
    Joint Publication 5-00.1 Joint Doctrine for Campaign Planning 25 January 2002 PREFACE 1. Scope 3. Application This publication provides overarching a. Doctrine and guidance established in guidance and principles governing the this publication apply to the commanders planning of campaigns at the combatant of combatant commands, subunified command and subordinate joint force levels. commands, joint task forces, and subordinate It focuses on the methodology for translating components of these commands. These national and theater strategy into planning principles and guidance also may apply when actions required to design and synchronize a significant forces of one Service are attached campaign plan. It describes joint campaign to forces of another Service or when planning across the full range of military significant forces of one Service support operations at the strategic and operational forces of another Service. levels of war. It discusses campaign planning within the context of the Joint Operation b. The guidance in this publication is Planning and Execution System and guides authoritative; as such, this doctrine will be planners to necessary planning references. followed except when, in the judgment of the commander, exceptional circumstances 2. Purpose dictate otherwise. If conflicts arise between the contents of this publication and the This publication has been prepared under contents of Service publications, this the direction of the Chairman of the Joint publication will take precedence for the Chiefs of Staff. It sets forth doctrine to govern activities of joint forces unless the Chairman the joint activities and performance of the of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, normally in Armed Forces of the United States in joint coordination with the other members of the operations and provides the doctrinal basis Joint Chiefs of Staff, has provided more for US military involvement in multinational current and specific guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Mathematicians and Mathematics in World War I. Part I: Galicia (Austro-Hungarian Empire)
    Science in Poland Stanisław Domoradzki ORCID 0000-0002-6511-0812 Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszów (Rzeszów, Poland) [email protected] Małgorzata Stawiska ORCID 0000-0001-5704-7270 Mathematical Reviews (Ann Arbor, USA) [email protected] Polish mathematicians and mathematics in World War I. Part I: Galicia (Austro-Hungarian Empire) Abstract In this article we present diverse experiences of Polish math- ematicians (in a broad sense) who during World War I fought for freedom of their homeland or conducted their research and teaching in difficult wartime circumstances. We discuss not only individual fates, but also organizational efforts of many kinds (teaching at the academic level outside traditional institutions, Polish scientific societies, publishing activities) in order to illus- trate the formation of modern Polish mathematical community. PUBLICATION e-ISSN 2543-702X INFO ISSN 2451-3202 DIAMOND OPEN ACCESS CITATION Domoradzki, Stanisław; Stawiska, Małgorzata 2018: Polish mathematicians and mathematics in World War I. Part I: Galicia (Austro-Hungarian Empire. Studia Historiae Scientiarum 17, pp. 23–49. Available online: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.18.003.9323. ARCHIVE RECEIVED: 2.02.2018 LICENSE POLICY ACCEPTED: 22.10.2018 Green SHERPA / PUBLISHED ONLINE: 12.12.2018 RoMEO Colour WWW http://www.ejournals.eu/sj/index.php/SHS/; http://pau.krakow.pl/Studia-Historiae-Scientiarum/ Stanisław Domoradzki, Małgorzata Stawiska Polish mathematicians and mathematics in World War I ... In Part I we focus on mathematicians affiliated with the ex- isting Polish institutions of higher education: Universities in Lwów in Kraków and the Polytechnical School in Lwów, within the Austro-Hungarian empire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crime of Genocide Committed Against the Poles by the USSR Before and During World War II: an International Legal Study, 45 Case W
    Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 45 | Issue 3 2012 The rC ime of Genocide Committed against the Poles by the USSR before and during World War II: An International Legal Study Karol Karski Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Karol Karski, The Crime of Genocide Committed against the Poles by the USSR before and during World War II: An International Legal Study, 45 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 703 (2013) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol45/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 45 Spring 2013 Issue 3 The Crime of Genocide Committed Against the Poles by the USSR Before and During WWII: An International Legal Study Karol Karski Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law·Vol. 45·2013 The Crime of Genocide Committed Against the Poles The Crime of Genocide Committed Against the Poles by the USSR Before and During World War II: An International Legal Study Karol Karski* The USSR’s genocidal activity against the Polish nation started before World War II. For instance, during the NKVD’s “Polish operation” of 1937 and 1938, the Communist regime exterminated about 85,000 Poles living at that time on the pre- war territory of the USSR.
    [Show full text]