DOCSLIB.ORG

Copyright © 2014 Randall Scott Fryar All Rights Reserved. the Southern

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Copyright © 2014 Randall Scott Fryar All Rights Reserved. the Southern Copyright © 2014 Randall Scott Fryar All rights reserved. The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary has permission to reproduce and disseminate this document in any form by any means for purposes chosen by the Seminary, including, without limitation, preservation or instruction. THE NON-ENDING SEARCH FOR A PRE-DNA REPLICATOR: RICHARD DAWKINS AND THE PROBLEM OF ABIOGENESIS __________________ A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary __________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy __________________ by Randall Scott Fryar May 2014 APPROVAL SHEET THE NON-ENDING SEARCH FOR A PRE-DNA REPLICATOR: RICHARD DAWKINS AND THE PROBLEM OF ABIOGENESIS Randall Scott Fryar Read and Approved by: __________________________________________ Theodore J. Cabal (Chair) __________________________________________ James Parker III __________________________________________ Mark T. Coppenger Date ______________________________ To Wendy, the love of my life and best friend. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page PREFACE …………………………………………………………………………. ix Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION……………..…………………………………………… 1 The Gap Separating Non-Life from Life ……………….……………….. 1 Contribution of Richard Dawkins ………………………………………. 5 Focus of this Study ……………………………………………………… 7 Background of this Study …………………………………..………….... 8 Structure of this Study …………………………………………………… 10 2. HISTORY OF ABIOGENESIS……………………………………………. 13 Antiquity: A Mythological Beginning ………………………………….. 13 Judaism: Case of the Miraculous ……………………………………….. 18 The Greeks: The Rise of Rationale ……………………………………… 21 The Medieval Era and Speculation ……..….…………………............... 26 The Enlightenment: Return to Naturalism ………………………………. 28 The 19th Century: Science Coming of Age …………………………….... 34 Evolution: Darwin’s Metanarrative .………….………………………….. 36 The Prevailing Zeitgeist ……………………………………………….... 40 3. THE CONTRIBUTION OF DAWKINS …….....…………….…………… 44 Introduction ………………………………………………………………. 44 iv Chapter Page A Life Destined for Science ………………….………………….…...... 45 Dawkins’s Computer Simulations ……….…………………………….. 49 “Methinks it is Like a Weasel” Program ……………………….… 51 D’Arcy Thompson’s Transformations …………………………… 58 Dawkins’s Biomorph Program .…………………………………... 60 Dawkins’s Movement Between Models ………………………………... 66 Dawkins’s 1st Model: The Prebiotic Soup ……………………..…. 67 Dawkins’s 2nd Model: A Crystalline Theory ……..……………... 73 Dawkins’s 3rd Model: Panspermia ……………………………….. 77 Dawkins’s 4th Model: RNA World ………………………………. 81 4. DAWKINS AND THE CLASSIC SOLUTION …………………………. 86 Introduction …………………………………………………………….. 86 The Prevailing View ……………………………………………… 87 Era of Optimism ………………………………………………….. 89 The General Theory ………………………………………………. 90 Dawkins’s Selfish Gene ………………………………………………… 93 Dawkins on Altruistic Behavior …………………………………… 94 Dawkins’s Position on the Study ………………………………….. 95 Philosophical and Scientific Assumptions ……………………….. 97 The Assumed Process for the Origin of Life …………………………... 109 Entropy and the Second Law …………………………………..…. 109 Going Against the Second Law …………………………………… 112 Self-Organization and Selection ………………………………….. 116 Evidence of emergence …………………………………...... 118 v Chapter Page Complexity through gradualism …………………………… 121 Information and Complexity …………………………………….. 127 Conclusion ……………………………………………………….. 134 5. A MOVE TOWARD ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS …………………. 136 Introduction ……………………………………………………………. 136 Setting Aside the Gene-Centered Studies .….…………………………. 139 In Defense of Evolution ……………………………………………….. 143 Empirical Evidence ………………………………………………. 144 The early atmosphere ……………………………………….. 145 Spiegelman’s “Little Monster” ……………………………… 148 Rebek’s autocatalytic system ……………………………….. 151 Current Theoretical Modeling ……………………………………. 154 Cairns-Smith’s clay replicators ……………………………… 155 Manfred Eigen’s hypercycle ………………………………… 159 Thomas Gold’s deep, hot biosphere ………………………… 163 Computer modeling ………………………………………….. 168 6. DAWKINS’S INTEREST IN PANSPERMIA …………………………… 170 Introduction …………………………………………………………….. 170 History of Panspermia ………………………………………………….. 171 Explanation of the Theory ……………………………………................ 174 Dawkins’s Move toward Panspermia ………………………………...... 175 Interview with Ben Stein …………………………………………. 177 Dawkins’s Reasoning toward Panspermia ……………………….. 185 Dawkins’s Ambiguous Solution ……………………………………….. 188 vi Chapter Page Dawkins on Directed Panspermia ………………………………… 189 Dawkins on the Probability of Alien Life ………………………… 192 Dawkins on “Advanced” Alien Life ……………………………… 195 The Characteristics of Alien Life …………………………..……… 198 Minimal Life Elsewhere …………………………………………... 203 Search for Life in the Solar System ………………….……………. 205 Search for Life outside the Solar System …………………………. 209 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………... 213 7. DAWKINS AND RNA WORLD THEORY …………………………….. 215 Introduction ………………………………………………………….…. 215 History of RNA World …………………………………………………. 217 Challenges to RNA World Theory …….……………………………...... 220 Dawkins and RNA World Theory….………………………………….... 222 Impact of Dawkins’s Worldview …………………….……………….... 226 Current Status of RNA World ………………………………………….. 228 8. CONCLUSION .…………………………………………………………. 233 Initial Remarks: Dawkins and Abiogenesis …………………………… 233 Dawkins’s Search for a Solution ………………………………………. 236 Applying Theistic Science to Abiogenesis ……………………………. 238 God-of-the-Gaps: A General Response ……………………………….. 240 God-of-the-Gaps: A Specific Response ……………………………….. 243 Admonition against Methodological Naturalism ……………………… 246 Failure of Metaphysical Naturalism …………………………………….. 251 Current State of the Problem ……………………………………………. 257 vii Chapter Page Further Research ……………………………………………………….. 258 BIBLIOGRAPHY …………………………………………………………… 260 viii PREFACE Only through the grace of God has this dissertation been possible given the many obstacles I have experienced. To learn how to thoroughly research and critically argue through a paper of this magnitude yields perhaps the greatest challenge of all. The experience itself has truly given me a whole new perspective of the process and upon those who have accomplished it before me. They had undoubtedly earned it and I am humbled beyond measure to be even mentioned among them. I am simply amazed that an airline pilot who had thought about enrolling in an off campus hermeneutics course a decade ago would ever arrive at this time and place. Little do we know how God will direct our paths. We must all have faith in preparing for the ride, for it is not always a smooth experience when God chooses to engage our hearts. He often demands our blood, sweat, and tears to take on the challenges presented to us. But what a joy it is in the grand scheme of it all as God alone receives praise! Along this journey, God has afforded me many to thank. Chuck Lawless is one of the first who comes to mind when thinking back to the decision made to pursue a research doctoral track. When faced against the seemingly impossible odds of attending mid-week classes amidst an airline schedule, I was dumbfounded as to how such a conflict could ever be resolved. Unbelievably, God saw to it that the out-of-town and out-of-country flights would neither interfere nor cause me to miss but a single class during the entire time. And that class, as Mark Coppenger knows, was due to my own faulty scheduling and not a lack of God’s provision. ix I would be remiss if I did not recognize the godly leadership and friendship offered by Peter Gentry, Steve Wellum, Bruce Ware, and Bill Cook. These men left their mark on my heart as brothers of insight and encouragement. But where they prepared me, God supplied others to polish the skills of my chosen discipline. Jim Parker, Mark Coppenger, James Chancellor and Ted Cabal poured their efforts into further refining that which was demanded. I am forever in their debt – especially to Ted Cabal, who has not left my side since taking me on in that opening interview. He has refined the fire in my heart and channeled it in a way that would best serve God and His kingdom. I thank God for each and every one of these men. I am also indebted to the encouragement of friends that God has brought into my life at this time. Brothers such as Brian Payne and Travis Kerns saw to it that I was steadfast to complete that which was before me. Then came men like Tawa Anderson who found a way to trudge through the process with me. In addition to these expected colleagues of the process, God has also blessed me with a few unexpected fellows who have encouraged and prayed for me along the way. A number of pilots at UPS had become aware of my work over time and offered their encouragement to get through it. Though there are too many to list here in this place, my thanks would be incomplete without mentioning Brad Clark, Mike Zawisza, Ron Karr, and Ivan Lasoi. Each has been a Barnabas to me. Last and certainly not least, I offer my greatest appreciation and thanks to those who bore the greatest challenge of all. Only through the love and support of my ever faithful and patient wife Wendy and my two children Ciana and Luke, could this dissertation been completed. They have respected my time to research and write, and x have celebrated each and every passing chapter that had been written (and edited). They are the ones who have kept the home fires burning for a weary pilot and researcher who had come in from the cold. All in all, my hope and prayer is that this dissertation does not simply accomplish the requirements of a degree, but that the truth about creation by the hand
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Venter Institute
    Genomics:GTL Program Projects J. Craig Venter Institute 42 Estimation of the Minimal Mycoplasma Gene Set Using Global Transposon Mutagenesis and Comparative Genomics John I. Glass* ([email protected]), Nina Alperovich, Nacyra Assad-Garcia, Shibu Yooseph, Mahir Maruf, Carole Lartigue, Cynthia Pfannkoch, Clyde A. Hutchison III, Hamilton O. Smith, and J. Craig Venter J. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD The Venter Institute aspires to make bacteria with specific metabolic capabilities encoded by artificial genomes. To achieve this we must develop technologies and strategies for creating bacterial cells from constituent parts of either biological or synthetic origin. Determining the minimal gene set needed for a functioning bacterial genome in a defined laboratory environment is a necessary step towards our goal. For our initial rationally designed cell we plan to synthesize a genome based on a mycoplasma blueprint (mycoplasma being the common name for the class Mollicutes). We chose this bacterial taxon because its members already have small, near minimal genomes that encode limited metabolic capacity and complexity. We took two approaches to determine what genes would need to be included in a truly minimal synthetic chromosome of a planned Mycoplasma laboratorium: determination of all the non-essential genes through random transposon mutagenesis of model mycoplasma species, Mycoplasma genitalium, and comparative genomics of a set of 15 mycoplasma genomes in order to identify genes common to all members of the taxon. Global transposon mutagenesis has been used to predict the essential gene set for a number of bac- teria. In Bacillus subtilis all but 271 of bacterium’s ~4100 genes could be knocked out.
    [Show full text]
  • Beowulf and Competitive Altruism,” P
    January 2013 Volume 9, Issue 1 ASEBL Journal Association for the Study of Editor (Ethical Behavior)•(Evolutionary Biology) in Literature St. Francis College, Brooklyn Heights, N.Y. Gregory F. Tague, Ph.D. ~ Editorial Board ~▪▪~ Kristy Biolsi, Ph.D. THIS ISSUE FEATURES Kevin Brown, Ph.D. Wendy Galgan, Ph.D. † Eric Luttrell, “Modest Heroism: Beowulf and Competitive Altruism,” p. 2 Cheryl L. Jaworski, M.A. † Dena R. Marks, “Secretary of Disorientation: Writing the Circularity of Belief in Elizabeth Costello,” p.11 Anja Müller-Wood, Ph.D. Kathleen A. Nolan, Ph.D. † Margaret Bertucci Hamper, “’The poor little working girl’: The New Woman, Chloral, and Motherhood in The House of Mirth,” p. 19 Riza Öztürk, Ph.D. † Kristin Mathis, “Moral Courage in The Runaway Jury,” p. 22 Eric Platt, Ph.D. † William Bamberger, “A Labyrinthine Modesty: On Raymond Roussel Michelle Scalise Sugiyama, and Chiasmus,” p. 24 Ph.D. ~▪~ Editorial Interns † St. Francis College Moral Sense Colloquium: - Program Notes, p. 27 Tyler Perkins - Kristy L. Biolsi, “What Does it Mean to be a Moral Animal?”, p. 29 - Sophie Berman, “Science sans conscience n’est que ruine de l’âme,” p.36 ~▪~ Kimberly Resnick † Book Reviews: - Lisa Zunshine, editor, Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies. Gregory F. Tague, p. 40 - Edward O. Wilson, The Social Conquest of Earth. Wendy Galgan, p. 42 ~▪~ ~ Contributor Notes, p. 45 Announcements, p. 45 ASEBL Journal Copyright©2013 E-ISSN: 1944-401X *~* [email protected] www.asebl.blogspot.com ASEBL Journal – Volume 9 Issue 1, January 2013 Modest Heroism: Beowulf and Competitive Altruism Eric Luttrell Christian Virtues or Human Virtues? Over the past decade, adaptations of Beowulf in popular media have portrayed the eponymous hero as a dim-witted and egotistical hot-head.
    [Show full text]
  • Virus of the Mind
    OF THE Also by Richard Brodie Getting Past OK: A Straightforward Guide to Having a Fantastic Life ttt Hay House Titles of Related Interest YOU CAN HEAL YOUR LIFE, the movie, starring Louise L. Hay & Friends (available as a 1-DVD program and an expanded 2-DVD set) Watch the trailer at: www.LouiseHayMovie.com THE SHIFT: the movie, starring Wayne W. Dyer (available as a 1-DVD program and an expanded 2-DVD set) Watch the trailer at: www.DyerMovie.com ttt ASK & IT IS GIVEN: Learning to Manifest the Law of Attraction, by Esther & Jerry Hicks THE BIOLOGY OF BELIEF: Unleashing the Power of Consciousness, Matter & Miracles, by Bruce H. Lipton, PhD DESTINY vs. FREE WILL: Why Things Happen the Way They Do, by David R. Hamilton, PhD FRACTAL TIME: The Secret of 2012 and a New World Age, by Gregg Braden POWER vs. FORCE: The Hidden Determinants of Human Behavior, by David R. Hawkins, MD, PhD STOP THE EXCUSES! How to Change Lifelong Self-Defeating Thinking Habits, by Dr Wayne W. Dyer Please visit Hay House UK: www.hayhouse.co.uk Hay House USA: www.hayhouse.com® Hay House Australia: www.hayhouse.com.au Hay House South Africa: www.hayhouse.co.za Hay House India: www.hayhouse.co.in OF THE The New Science of the Meme Richard Brodie Published and distributed in the United Kingdom by: Hay House UK Ltd, 292B Kensal Rd, London W10 5BE. Tel.: (44) 20 8962 1230; Fax: (44) 20 8962 1239. www.hayhouse.co.uk Published and distributed in the United States of America by: Hay House, Inc., PO Box 5100, Carlsbad, CA 92018-5100.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbial Identification Framework for Risk Assessment
    Microbial Identification Framework for Risk Assessment May 2017 Cat. No.: En14-317/2018E-PDF ISBN 978-0-660-24940-7 Information contained in this publication or product may be reproduced, in part or in whole, and by any means, for personal or public non-commercial purposes, without charge or further permission, unless otherwise specified. You are asked to: • Exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced; • Indicate both the complete title of the materials reproduced, as well as the author organization; and • Indicate that the reproduction is a copy of an official work that is published by the Government of Canada and that the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with or with the endorsement of the Government of Canada. Commercial reproduction and distribution is prohibited except with written permission from the author. For more information, please contact Environment and Climate Change Canada’s Inquiry Centre at 1-800-668-6767 (in Canada only) or 819-997-2800 or email to [email protected]. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of the Environment and Climate Change, 2016. Aussi disponible en français Microbial Identification Framework for Risk Assessment Page 2 of 98 Summary The New Substances Notification Regulations (Organisms) (the regulations) of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA) are organized according to organism type (micro- organisms and organisms other than micro-organisms) and by activity. The Microbial Identification Framework for Risk Assessment (MIFRA) provides guidance on the required information for identifying micro-organisms. This document is intended for those who deal with the technical aspects of information elements or information requirements of the regulations that pertain to identification of a notified micro-organism.
    [Show full text]
  • Classic Text 15 - Atheism
    1 Classic Text 15 - Atheism In Classic Text 03 and to a lesser extent in Classic Text 06 we considered several argu- ments in favour of God’s existence, all of which were problematic in one way or an- other. Atheism, on the other hand, from the Greek ἄθεος (atheos) for “without a god” is the belief that there are no gods or God. The earliest documented evidence for atheism comes from the time of the historical Vedic religion in India in the 6th Century BCE and in Classical antiquity in the 5th Century BCE in the West. There have been many secular and atheistic historical movements or rather coun- ter movements down the centuries, most noteworthy beginning in the Renaissance; however the atheism we shall be considering has been described by Wikipedia as “New Atheism”. (Wikipedia: New Atheism) With notable exceptions such as Periyar E. V. Ramasamy, Vladimir Lenin and Bertrand Rus- sell, most atheists before the turn of the 21st Century had been content to “practice” their disbelief in private. Whether spurred by the terrorist attacks of 9/11 or the 7/7 London bombings of 2005 or the ongoing revelations of sexual abuse within the Catholic Church, prominent scientists and philosophers like Richard Dawkins and Daniel Dennett and other intellectuals have been advocating that “religion should not simply be tolerated but should be countered, criticized, and exposed by rational argument wherever its influence arises.” (Hooper, 2006) Unlike previous thinkers who regarded religion merely as a source of error or folly, the New Atheists argue that it is harmful on both a personal and social level.
    [Show full text]
  • Dawkins, 1991. Viruses of the Mind
    “Viruses of the Mind” Richard Dawkins 1991 The haven all memes depend on reaching is the human mind, but a human mind is itself an artifact created when memes restructure a human brain in order to make it a better habitat for memes. The avenues for entry and departure are modified to suit local conditions, and strengthened by various artificial devices that enhance fidelity and prolixity of replication: native Chinese minds differ dramatically from native French minds, and literate minds differ from illiterate minds. What memes provide in return to the organisms in which they reside is an incalculable store of advantages—with some Trojan horses thrown in for good measure. –Daniel Dennett, Consciousness Explained 1 Duplication Fodder A beautiful child close to me, six and the apple of her father’s eye, believes that Thomas the Tank Engine really exists. She believes in Father Christmas, and when she grows up her ambition is to be a tooth fairy. She and her school-friends believe the solemn word of respected adults that tooth fairies and Father Christmas really exist. This little girl is of an age to believe whatever you tell her. If you tell her about witches changing princes into frogs she will believe you. If you tell her that bad children roast forever in hell she will have nightmares. I have just discovered that without her father’s consent this sweet, trusting, gullible six-year-old is being sent, for weekly instruction, to a Roman Catholic nun. What chance has she? A human child is shaped by evolution to soak up the culture of her people.
    [Show full text]
  • Sol Spiegelman, a Pioneer in Molecular Biology
    They Wand 0SS tk Slmsldera of Giants: Sol S@egelman, a Piomer in l$lokcular Biology Number 21 May 23,1983 Science in our century has been Indeed, it is upon his widely acclaimed marked by tremendous upheavals in un- discoveries that much of the framework derstanding, brought about by momen- of the discipline now rests. Sol was still tous discoveries and extraordinary pe~ deeply involved in a number of projects ple. One such upheaval has occurred in when, tragically, he died following a biology. It began in the 1930s, when a brief illness on January 21, 1983.2 This new field, molecular biology, was born essay is dedicated to his memory, and to of the synthesis of five distinct disci- the surviving members of his family: hw plines: physical chemistry, crystallogra- wife, Helen; his daughter, Marjorie; and phy, genetics, microbiology, and bio- hk sons, Willard and George. chemistry.1 I deeply regret that Sol did not have Molecular biologists try to explain the opportunity to read this long biological phenomena at the molecular overdue discussion of his work. I had level. By the mid-twentieth century, planned to do this as part of our series of they had settled several problems that essays on various awards in science—in plagued previous generations of biolo- particular, the Feltnnelfi prize, men- gists. For instance, proteins and nucleic tioned later. Sol was one of the true acids had been known since the nine- giants of modem science. So it is with a teenth century to be very large mole- mixed sense of pain and gratitude that I cules, each consisting of long chains of use thk opportunity to pay tribute to a subunits—amino acids in the case of man whose genius was unique.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Dawkins
    RICHARD DAWKINS HOW A SCIENTIST CHANGED THE WAY WE THINK Reflections by scientists, writers, and philosophers Edited by ALAN GRAFEN AND MARK RIDLEY 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offices in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York © Oxford University Press 2006 with the exception of To Rise Above © Marek Kohn 2006 and Every Indication of Inadvertent Solicitude © Philip Pullman 2006 The moral rights of the authors have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2006 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should
    [Show full text]
  • The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint and Speciation
    The spindle assembly checkpoint and speciation Robert C. Jackson1 and Hitesh B. Mistry2 1 Pharmacometrics Ltd., Cambridge, United Kingdom 2 Division of Pharmacy, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom ABSTRACT A mechanism is proposed by which speciation may occur without the need to postulate geographical isolation of the diverging populations. Closely related species that occupy overlapping or adjacent ecological niches often have an almost identical genome but differ by chromosomal rearrangements that result in reproductive isolation. The mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint normally functions to prevent gametes with non-identical karyotypes from forming viable zygotes. Unless gametes from two individuals happen to undergo the same chromosomal rearrangement at the same place and time, a most improbable situation, there has been no satisfactory explanation of how such rearrange- ments can propagate. Consideration of the dynamics of the spindle assembly checkpoint suggest that chromosomal fission or fusion events may occur that allow formation of viable heterozygotes between the rearranged and parental karyotypes, albeit with decreased fertility. Evolutionary dynamics calculations suggest that if the resulting heterozygous organisms have a selective advantage in an adjoining or overlapping ecological niche from that of the parental strain, despite the reproductive disadvantage of the population carrying the altered karyotype, it may accumulate sufficiently that homozygotes begin to emerge. At this point the reproductive disadvantage of the rearranged karyotype disappears, and a single population has been replaced by two populations that are partially reproductively isolated. This definition of species as populations that differ from other, closely related, species by karyotypic changes is consistent with the classical definition of a species as a population that is capable of interbreeding to produce fertile progeny.
    [Show full text]
  • The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins Is Another
    BOOKS & ARTS COMMENT ooks about science tend to fall into two categories: those that explain it to lay people in the hope of cultivat- Bing a wide readership, and those that try to persuade fellow scientists to support a new theory, usually with equations. Books that achieve both — changing science and reach- ing the public — are rare. Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species (1859) was one. The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins is another. From the moment of its publication 40 years ago, it has been a sparkling best-seller and a TERRY SMITH/THE LIFE IMAGES COLLECTION/GETTY SMITH/THE LIFE IMAGES TERRY scientific game-changer. The gene-centred view of evolution that Dawkins championed and crystallized is now central both to evolutionary theoriz- ing and to lay commentaries on natural history such as wildlife documentaries. A bird or a bee risks its life and health to bring its offspring into the world not to help itself, and certainly not to help its species — the prevailing, lazy thinking of the 1960s, even among luminaries of evolution such as Julian Huxley and Konrad Lorenz — but (uncon- sciously) so that its genes go on. Genes that cause birds and bees to breed survive at the expense of other genes. No other explana- tion makes sense, although some insist that there are other ways to tell the story (see K. Laland et al. Nature 514, 161–164; 2014). What stood out was Dawkins’s radical insistence that the digital information in a gene is effectively immortal and must be the primary unit of selection.
    [Show full text]
  • A Theological Perspective on the Phenomenon of Life: Introduction Into the Bios, Psyche, and Zoe
    ROCZNIKI TEOLOGICZNE TOM LXVII, zeszyt 2 – 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rt20672-7 ANNA PĘDRAK KAMIL DUSZEK A THEOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE PHENOMENON OF LIFE: INTRODUCTION INTO THE BIOS, PSYCHE, AND ZOE A b s t r a c t . Life is such a beautiful and unique phenomenon. It cannot be described by a single definition, as it manifests itself in many different ways. Therefore, the phenomenon of life must be cap- tured as a whole and by including its essential planes. The authors of the paper did interdisciplinary research. Their task was an exploration of the issue of life on three planes: bios (life in its core manifes- tations), psyche (intelligent and conscious life), and zoe (life that transcends itself). The collected data gives an appropriate perspective for theological insight. This approach determines a methodology that is interdisciplinary and very theological in character. This in-depth perspective enables the whole phe- nomenon to be understood in its transcendental function. Life from its very inception emerges toward “something more.” The final goal of this transcendental dynamism is ever-living God. Key words: bios; psyche; zoe; religion and science; transcendentality; contemporary theology. 1. INTRODUCTION Is it possible to capture the essence of life? At present, many different branches of science dealing with the issue of life provide very interesting data. However, each of them captures this phenomenon in a narrow and precise field, so although their conclusions are pertinent, they are also limited. Despite the tremendous intel- Anna Pędrak, MA (can. licentiate) – doctoral student of dogmatic theology at the Faculty of Theology of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin; e-mail: [email protected]; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9813-5277.
    [Show full text]
  • National Academy of Sciences Annual Meeting
    National Academy of Sciences Annual Meeting The 107th Annual Meeting of the National Academy of Sciences was held on April 27-29, 1970, in Washington, D.C. Academy Awards were presented at a ceremony held in the Great Hall on Monday evening. The presentation was followed by an informal reception for members and their guests in honor of the award recipients. At the Academy Dinner on Tuesday night, Barnaby C. Keeney, Chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities, was the guest speaker. Scientific sessions were comprised of symposia, sessions of in- vited papers, and contributed papers. Abstracts of contributed papers and groups of invited papers appear in this issue. PRESENTATION OF ACADEMY AWARDS George P. Merrill Award KLAUS KEIL, University of New Mexico National Academy of Sciences Award in Microbiology EARL REECE STADTMAN, National Heart and Lung Institute U.S. Steel Foundation Award in Molecular Biology ARMIN DALE KAISER, Stanford University Jessie Stevenson Kovalenko Medal THOMAS FRANCIS, JR. (Posthumous presentation), University of Michigan Mary Clark Thompson Medal RAYMOND CECIL MOORE, University of Kansas J. Lawrence Smith Medal EDWARD PORTER HENDERSON, Smithsonian Institution Downloaded by guest on September 27, 2021 222 N. A. S. ANNUAL MEETING 1970 PROC. N. A. S. Monday Morning: SYMPOSIUM ON THE CRISIS IN FEDERAL FUNDING OF SCIENCE CURRENT PROBLEMS Moderator: HARVEY BROOKS Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts WILLIAM G. ANLYAN, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina HERBERT E. CARTER, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois CARL M. YORK, Office of Science and Technology, Washington, D. C. VICTOR F. WEISSKOPF, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts YARON EzRAHI, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts FUTURE COURSES Moderator: EMANUEL R.
    [Show full text]