Tracing the Chains of Thought in the Aphoristic Writing of Ludwig Hohl
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
TRACING THE CHAINS OF THOUGHT IN THE APHORISTIC WRITING OF LUDWIG HOHL (WITH REFERENCE TO SEVERAL ASPECTS OF THE APHORISTIC WRITING OF FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE AND PETER HANDKE) by ALEXANDRA SATTLER A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of German Studies School of Languages, Cultures, Art History, and Music College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham January 2016 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis investigates the use of aphorism in the work (Notizenwerk) of Ludwig Hohl and selected passages of Friedrich Nietzsche and Peter Handke in order to demonstrate the connections (Zusammenhänge) between aphorisms, taking seriously what aphoristic writers say about their own work, i.e. that aphorisms are the result of long secret chains of thought (Nietzsche). The study thereby addresses a gap in the research identified by Neumann. Concurring with Fedler, this thesis understands aphorism as combining conceptual with metaphorical (non-conceptual) thought and chains of thought are investigated on different levels. The dissertation illustrates that aphoristic writers dissolve conceptual boundaries and have elaborate concepts of phantasy (Phantasie), confirming Blumenberg’s view that wherever the conceptual is questioned, phantasy will be re-evaluated. In the course of this, Kassner’s influence on Hohl and Hohl’s influence on Handke will be shown. With the help of Begriffsgeschichte the thesis will demonstrate unity underlying Hohl’s Notizen, that aphorisms are capable of expressing a complex life-affirming theory, and that furthermore the aphorism cannot be understood without an existential, ineffable and personal dimension. An ontological fragmentariness underlies aphoristic writing, meaning that there is no opposition between aphorism and fragment and that instead aphorisms are inherently fragmentary. DEDICATION To R.W.K. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am grateful to Dr Nigel Harris (University of Birmingham) and Professor Bill Dodd (University of Birmingham) for supervising of this thesis. To write this thesis would have been far harder without the generosity and support of Stephen Mitchelmore, Dr Herman Siemens (Leiden University) and the NHS. I am also indebted to Professor Scott Abbott’s (Utah Valley University) generous advice on Peter Handke and to Dr Rainer Marwedel (Hannover) for many early conversations about Hohl. CONTENTS I Introduction............................................................................................................................1 I.1 Methodological and Theoretical Considerations..............................................................2 I.1.1 Theoretical Considerations regarding previous Research into the Aphorism...........6 I.2 General Outline of the Argument....................................................................................9 II Approaches to the Aphorism..............................................................................................15 II.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................15 II.2.1 Harald Fricke.........................................................................................................18 II.2.2 Stephan Fedler.......................................................................................................24 II.2.3 Heinz Krüger.........................................................................................................29 II.2.4 Gary Saul Morson.................................................................................................39 II.3. Conclusion...................................................................................................................50 III Ludwig Hohl, Friedrich Nietzsche: General Problems related to................................55 the Aphorism and the Structure of Aphoristic Writing III.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................55 III.1.1 Influence..............................................................................................................61 III.2 Addressing Questions of Mode: Aphorism, Fragment, Note, Sentenz, Betrachtung..64 III.2.1 Rejection of the Term ‘Aphorism’ by Aphoristic Writers....................................64 III.2.1.1 Rejection of the System...............................................................................72 III.2.2 Hohl’s Rejection of the Aphorism........................................................................74 III.2.2.1 The Unity in Hohl’s Notizen.........................................................................78 III.2.3 Nietzsche’s Rejection of Classification................................................................86 III.2.4 Hohl and the Note...............................................................................................101 III.2.5 Hohl and the Fragment.......................................................................................111 III.2.5.1 Fragment as Mode......................................................................................112 III.2.5.2 Fragment as Ontological Category: Ontological Fragmentariness.............113 III.2.5.2.1 The Problem of Beginnings and Conclusions....................................122 III.2.5.2.2 Wirklichkeit and Realität....................................................................125 III.3 Chains of Thought.....................................................................................................127 III.3.1 Nietzsche: Repetition and Connectedness..........................................................133 III.4 Ingenium and the Capacity to Create Context: Hohl’s Notion of Zusammenhänge..137 III.5 Reading the Aphorism: Challenges and Methods......................................................150 III.5.1 Methods of Reading...........................................................................................150 III.5.2 The Role of Personality......................................................................................157 III.5.2.1 The Role of Personality in Reading............................................................162 III.5.3 Hohl’s Views on Reading...................................................................................164 III.6 Conclusion..................................................................................................................171 IV The Conceptual Dimension of Aphoristic Writing......................................................173 IV.1 Introduction...............................................................................................................173 IV.2 Reinventions of the Concept....................................................................................177 IV.2.1 Nietzsche: Concept of Fluid Sense.....................................................................177 IV.2.1.1 Origin of Words and Concepts in Über Wahrheit und Lüge im..................178 außermoralischen Sinne IV.2.1.2 Nietzsche’s Concept of Fluid Sense in Genealogie zur Moral...................179 IV.2.2 Hohl: Complex Concept.....................................................................................183 IV.3 Hohl’s Concept of Kraft............................................................................................187 IV.3.1 Relation of Kraft to the Self..........................................................................189 IV.3.1.2 Invincibility and Obstacles.........................................................................192 IV.3.1.3 The Integral Nature of Power, Competition and....................................195 Movement (Bewegung) IV.3.1.3.1 Sport and Daily Life............................................................................198 IV.3.1.4 Authority and Social Power.........................................................................200 IV.3.2 Geisteskräfte.......................................................................................................202 IV.3.2.1 Courage (Mut).............................................................................................202 IV.3.2.2 Choice (Wahl)..............................................................................................205 IV.3.2.3 Patience (Geduld)........................................................................................208 IV.3.2.4 Belief (Glaube)..........................................................................................212 IV.4 Tenderness (Zartheit) & the Immense (das Gewaltige).............................................214 IV.5 Conclusion..................................................................................................................217 V The Metaphorical Dimension of Aphoristic Writing.....................................................219 V.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................219