DOCSLIB.ORG

Dec. 2016 CURRICULUM VITAE RUTH ABBEY Educational Background Phd in Political Science, Mcgill University, 1995. Di

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dec. 2016 CURRICULUM VITAE RUTH ABBEY Educational Background Phd in Political Science, Mcgill University, 1995. Di Updated – Dec. 2016 CURRICULUM VITAE RUTH ABBEY Educational Background PhD in Political Science, McGill University, 1995. Dissertation: Descent & Dissent: Nietzsche's Reading of Two French Moralists. Supervisor: Charles Taylor. MA in Political Science, McGill University, 1989 Research paper: John Dewey: A Fresh Look BA, Monash University, 1984. First class honours in Political Science and a Major in English. Thesis title: The Liberation of the senses in Karl Marx’s Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 Career Current Position Professor, Dept. of Political Science, University of Notre Dame Previous Positions 2005-2013 Associate Professor, Dept. of Political Science, University of Notre Dame 2008-2009 Faculty Fellow Murphy Institute for Ethics and Public Affairs Tulane University, New Orleans 2002-2005 Senior Lecturer Department of Politics & International Relations University of Kent at Canterbury 2000-2002 Lecturer in Political Theory, Department of Politics and International Relations, UKC 2000 Senior Lecturer in Philosophy, University of Notre Dame, Australia 1999-2000 Member of the School of Social Science, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey 2 1999 Acting Director, Politics & Law Program, College of Law, University of Notre Dame, Australia Honorary Research Fellow, Department of Political Science, University of Western Australia. 1997 Visiting Scholar, Faculty of Social & Political Sciences, Cambridge University (Michaelmas Term) 1996-1997 Postdoctoral Fellow in Political Science, University of Western Australia (UWA); Part-time lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Notre Dame, Australia 1995 Lecturer in Philosophy & Assistant Dean, College of Arts & Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Australia; Sessional Lecturer, Department of Political Science, UWA 1994 Part-time Lecturer in Philosophy, University of Notre Dame, Australia 1991-1992 Assistant Lecturer, Department of Political Science, McGill University 1990 Part-time Research Assistant, Department of Political Science, McGill 1985-1987 Full-time Tutor, Department of Politics, Monash University Publications Monographs Nietzsche’s Middle Period. Oxford University Press, New York, 2000. 208pp. Reviewed in The Review of Metaphysics, 55, September 2001, 117-18; Mind Vol. 111, No. 442, April, 2002, 434-443; British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Vol. 10, No. 2, May 2002, 318-20; Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 80, No. 3, Sept. 2002, pp. 390-92 Charles Taylor. Princeton University Press and Acumen Publishing, UK, 2000 250pp. Selected as one of the 2002 Outstanding Academic Titles by Choice Magazine; Reviewed in Radical Philosophy, 108, July-Aug, 2001, 52-54; Australian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 36, Issue 3, Nov. 2001, p. 618; Review of Politics, Vol. 64, No. 1, Winter 2002, 170-72; Thesis Eleven, #71, 1, 2002, 142-146; 3 Review of Metaphysics, Vol. 56, No. 1, Sept. 2002, 157-8; University of Toronto Quarterly, Vol. 71, No.1, Winter 2002; Philosophy in Review, XXII, No. 5, 2002; Carnegie Council, July 1, 2002 Ethics, Vol. 113, No. 2, January 2003, 456. Australasian Catholic Record, 2003; Political Theory, Vol. 32, No. 5, Oct. 2004, 723-733 The Return of Feminist Liberalism. McGill-Queens University Press, 2011. 326pp. Reviewed in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, Dec. 2011 Journal of Gender Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3, September 2012, 327–8. International Feminist Journal of Politics, Volume 15, Issue 1, 2013 Hypatia, 2013 http://hypatiaphilosophy.org/HRO/reviews/content/178 In Progress Human All too Human: A Critical Introduction and Guide, The Edinburgh Guides to Nietzsche Series, Edinburgh University Press, Edited by Keith Ansell Pearson and Daniel Conway Edited Volumes In Progress Cosmopolitan Civility: Global-Local Reflections in Honor of Fred Dallmayr Contemporary Philosophy in Focus: Charles Taylor. Cambridge University Press, 2004. 220pp. Reviewed in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 2004.08.02; Heythrop Journal, 46 (2): 272-273 April, 2005; Perspectives on Political Science, Vol. 34, No. 1, Winter, 2005, p. 63; Philosophy in Review, XXV, No. 1, 2005, 1-3; Feminist Interpretations of Rawls. Part of the Penn State University Press Series Re- Reading the Canon. 2013 Reviewed in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/50412-feminist-interpretations-of-john-rawls/ 4 Hypatia http://hypatiaphilosophy.org/HRO/reviews/content/223 Publications in Refereed Journals Published “Putting Cruelty First: Animals and the Liberalism of Fear”, Animals and Politics, pp. 25 - 36, dec. 2016. ISSN 2002-0295. http://journals.lub.lu.se/index.php/pa/article/view/15202 “Closer Kinships? Rortyan Resources for Animal Rights”, Contemporary Political Theory, 2016, First online March 22, 2016. doi:10.1057/cpt.2016.10 “Nietzsche and Swanton on Self-Love” Journal of Value Inquiry. Volume 49, Issue 3 (2015), Page 387-403 “Lotsa Gotcha Moments for the Deciders”, Contribution to Symposium on The Eyes of the People. Political Theory. April 2014, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 202-6. [co-authored with Jeff Spinner Halev] “Rawls, Mill and the Problem of Political Liberalism”. Journal of Politics, 2013, pp. 1-13. [co-authored with Sarah Hyde] ‘No Country for Older People? Age and the Digital Divide’, Journal of Information, Communication & Ethics in Society, Vol. 7. No. 4, 2009, pp. 225-242. ‘Bricks and Stones’, The Review of Politics, Vol. 70, No. 2, 2008 pp.1-6. ‘Rawlsian Resources for Animal Ethics’, Ethics and the Environment, Vol. 12, No. 1, Spring 2007, pp. 1-22. `Back Toward a Comprehensive Liberalism? Justice as Fairness, Gender and Families’, Political Theory, Vol. 35, No. 1, Feb, 2007, pp. 1-24. 'Turning or Spinning? Charles Taylor’s Catholicism’, Contemporary Political Theory, Vol. 5, No. 2, May 2006, pp. 163-175. ‘Is Liberalism Now an Essentially Contested Concept?’ Journal of New Political Science, Vol. 27, No. 4, December 2005, pp. 461-480. 'Recognising Taylor Rightly: A Reply to Morag Patrick’, Ethnicities, 3 (1), March, 2003, pp. 115-131. 'Pluralism in Practice: The Political Thought of Charles Taylor’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Vol 5, No. 3 (Autumn 2002) pp. 98-123. 5 'Young Karl Does Headstands: A Reply to Daniel Brudney’, Political Theory, Vol. 30, No. 1, February 2002. pp. 151-156. [co-authored with Douglas Den Uyl] 'The Chief Inducement? The Idea of Marriage as Friendship', Journal of Applied Philosophy, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2001. 37-52 'Circles, Ladders and Stars: Nietzsche on Friendship’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2.4. Winter, 1999. pp. 50-73. 'The Roots of Ressentiment: Nietzsche on Vanity'. New Nietzsche Studies, Vol. 3, nos. 3 & 4, Summer/ Fall, 1999 pp. 47-61. 'Charles Taylor and the Politics of Recognition: A Reply to Jonathan Seglow’, Political Studies, 47 (4) September, 1999. pp. 710-714 'Back to the Future: Marriage as Friendship in the thought of Mary Wollstonecraft'. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy. 14, 3, Summer 1999. pp. 78-95. [co-authored with Fredrick Appel] 'Domesticating Nietzsche: A reply to Mark Warren’ Political Theory. Vol 27, No. 1. February, 1999 pp. 121-25 'Mediocrity versus Meritocracy: Nietzsche's (Mis)reading of Chamfort'. History of Political Thought, Volume XIX, No. 3, Autumn 1998. pp. 457-483 'Nietzsche and the Invention of Invention' Journal of Nietzsche Studies. Issue 15. Spring 1998 pp. 1-14. [co-authored with Fredrick Appel] 'Nietzsche and the Will to Politics'. Review of Politics. Winter, 1998 (January, Vol. 60:1) pp. 83-114 'Odd Bedfellows: Nietzsche and Mill on Marriage' History of European Ideas, Vol. 23, No 2-4, 1997. pp. 81-104 'More perspectives on communitarianism: A reply to Chandran Kukathas' Australian Quarterly Winter 1997. Vol 69, No. 2 pp. 73-82 'A Critique of Lynch’s Locke' Political Theory Newsletter. March, 1997. Vol 8 No 2 pp. 11-14 'Beyond Misogyny and Metaphor: Women in Nietzsche's Middle Period', Journal of the History of Philosophy (US). 34:2 April 1996 pp. 233-56 ‘Crocodile Dundee or Davy Crockett? What Crocodile Dundee doesn't say about Australia’ (with Jo Crawford) Journal of Popular Culture (US) XXIII:4 1990. pp. 155- 175. This was an expanded version of an article that appeared in Meanjin 46, 2. June 1987. pp. 145-52. 6 'Caveat Emptor! The False Advertising of the New Right' The Australian Quarterly 59: 3 & 4 1987. pp. 290-296. Chapters in Books "Siblings under the Skin?: Charles Taylor on Believers and Sceptics in A Secular Age" for Religion and Atheism: Beyond the Divide eds. Richard Norman and Tony Carroll. Routledge, UK, 2016. “Skilled Marksman and Strict Self-Examination: Nietzsche on La Rochefoucauld” in Nietzsche’s Free Spirit Philosophy (ed.) Rebecca Bamford, 2015, Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 13-32. [co-authored with Naomi Choi] Entry on Charles Taylor, Encyclopedia of Political Thought, edited by Michael Gibbon. 2015. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. “Are Women Human? Wollstonecraft’s Vindication of Rights for Women”, for the Vindication of the Rights of Woman in the "Rethinking the Western Canon" series, Yale University Press, 2014. Edited by Eileen Hunt Botting, pp. 229-245. “Theorizing Secularity 3: Authenticity, Ontology, Fragilization ” in Aspiring to Fullness in a Secular Age: Essays on Religion and Theology in the Work of Charles Taylor (eds.) Carlos D. Colorado and Justin D. Klassen, University of Notre Dame Press. 2014, pp. 98- 124. “Biography of a Bibliography: Three decades of feminist response to Rawls”, Editor’s Introduction to Feminist Interpretations of Rawls, Penn
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Impact of Aenesidemus Upon Fichte and Schopenhauer
    Richard Fincham 97 Pli 10 (2000), 96-126. subject from both object and subject and is referred to both".4 Fichte shows that although this may suffice as the first principle of theoretical knowledge, it cannot be the first principle of all philosophy.s Therefore, for Fichte, principles of theoretical knowledge can only be satisfactorily grounded upon the self qua reflective consciousness of Kantian and Reinholdian transcendental idealism once the existence of such reflective The Impact of Aenesidemus upon Fichte and consciousness is itself grounded upon an absolute foundation. It is of Schopenhauer course in response to this perceived requirement that Fichte constructs a system of transcendental idealism which asserts that the self itself ­ conceived of as primordially an absolute self-reverting activity - should RICHARD FINCHAM be the absolute foundation of all philosophy. This article will show why it is that for Fichte, 'reflective consciousness', which for Kant was the ground of all explanation, becomes conceived of as itself requiring explanation. It will be argued Fichte's reconfiguration of Kantian transcendental idealism is motivated that this is due to an engagement with a sceptical attack upon the by an engagement with two specific 'commentaries' upon it. Firstly, transcendental idealism of Kant and Reinhold named after (and Fichte was clearly convinced by Reinhold's complaint that the Critique's supposedly expounded by) the neo-Pyrrhonean sceptic Aenesidemus, principles can only "become universally binding"l by being grounded [I which was published anonymously in 1792, but was later revealed to be upon a universally valid and indubitable "self-explanatory,,2 foundation, the work of G.
    [Show full text]
  • Infinite Thought Truth and the Return to Philosophy
    Infinite Thought Truth and the Return to Philosophy ALAIN BADIOU Translated and edited by Oliver Feltham and Justin Clemens Continuum The Tower Building 15 East 26th Street II York Road New York London, SE I 7~X ;\IY 10010 www.continuumbooks.com Editorial material and selection © Oliver Feltharn and Justin Clemens Philosophy and Desire, Philosophy and Film, Philosophy and"the war against terrorism" © Alain Badiou Contents Philosophy andArt, and The Definition of Philosophy © Seuil (from Conditions, 1992) Philosophy and the Death of Communism © Editions de l'Aube (from D'un desastre obscur, 1998) An introduction to Alain Badiou's philosophy English language translations: 'Philosophy and Truth' © Pli; 'Philosophy and Politices' © Radical Philosophy; 'Philosophy and Psychoanalysis' (!:') Ana{ysis; all other English language translations © Continuum I Philosophy and desire 39 2 Philosophy and truth 58 Reprinted 2003 3 Philosophy and politics 69 This paperback edition published 2004 by Continuum 4- Philosophy and psychoanalysis 79 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or 5 Philosophy and art 91 transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical 6 Philosophy and cinema 109 including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. 7 Philosophy and the 'death of communism' 126 8 Philosophy and the 'war against British Library Oatalcgufng-dn-Publicarlon Data terrorism' 141 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library 9 The definition of philosophy 165 ISB:\" 0-8264-6724-5 (Hardback) 10 Ontology and politics: an interview with 0-8264-7320-2 (Paperback) Alain Badiou 169 Index of names 195 Typeset by BookEns Ltd, Royston, Herts.
    [Show full text]
  • Shame and Philosophy
    The University of Notre Dame Australia ResearchOnline@ND Philosophy Papers and Journal Articles School of Philosophy 2010 Shame and philosophy Richard P. Hamilton University of Notre Dame Australia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/phil_article Part of the Philosophy Commons This book review in a scholarly journal was originally published as: Hamilton, R. P. (2010). Shame and philosophy. Res Publica, 16 (4), 431-439. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-010-9120-4 This book review in a scholarly journal is posted on ResearchOnline@ND at https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/ phil_article/14. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Res Publica DOI 10.1007/s11158-010-9120-4 12 3 Shaming Philosophy 4 Richard Paul Hamilton 5 6 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 7 8 Michael L. Morgan (2008), On Shame. London: RoutledgePROOF (Thinking In Action). 9 Philip Hutchinson (2008), Philosophy and Shame: An Investigation in the 10 Philosophy of Emotions and Ethics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 11 Shame is a ubiquitous and highly intriguing feature of human experience. It can 12 motivate but it can also paralyse. It is something which one can legitimately demand 13 of another, but is not usually experienced as a choice. Perpetrators of atrocities can 14 remain defiantly immune to shame while their victims are racked by it. It would be 15 hard to understand any society or culture without understanding the characteristic 16 occasions upon which shame is expected and where it is mitigated. Yet, one can 17 survey much of the literature in social and political theory over the last century and 18 find barely a footnote to this omnipresent emotional experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Augustine and the Art of Ruling in the Carolingian Imperial Period
    Augustine and the Art of Ruling in the Carolingian Imperial Period This volume is an investigation of how Augustine was received in the Carolingian period, and the elements of his thought which had an impact on Carolingian ideas of ‘state’, rulership and ethics. It focuses on Alcuin of York and Hincmar of Rheims, authors and political advisers to Charlemagne and to Charles the Bald, respectively. It examines how they used Augustinian political thought and ethics, as manifested in the De civitate Dei, to give more weight to their advice. A comparative approach sheds light on the differences between Charlemagne’s reign and that of his grandson. It scrutinizes Alcuin’s and Hincmar’s discussions of empire, rulership and the moral conduct of political agents during which both drew on the De civitate Dei, although each came away with a different understanding. By means of a philological–historical approach, the book offers a deeper reading and treats the Latin texts as political discourses defined by content and language. Sophia Moesch is currently an SNSF-funded postdoctoral fellow at the University of Oxford, working on a project entitled ‘Developing Principles of Good Govern- ance: Latin and Greek Political Advice during the Carolingian and Macedonian Reforms’. She completed her PhD in History at King’s College London. Augustine and the Art of Ruling in the Carolingian Imperial Period Political Discourse in Alcuin of York and Hincmar of Rheims Sophia Moesch First published 2020 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN and by Routledge 52 Vanderbilt Avenue, New York, NY 10017 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business Published with the support of the Swiss National Science Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophical Practice As Contemplative Philosophy
    Practical Philosophy Spring 2006 Philosophical Practice as Contemplative Philosophy Ran Lahav As philosophical practitioners we are often asked: ‘What what is desirable, and adjusts philosophy to the demands is philosophical practice all about?’ And it is not easy to of the market. find a good answer, other than something like: ‘Well, philosophical practice is not one thing. There are all kinds But, hold on, one might say, is there anything wrong with of approaches.’ this contemporary trend? After all, people in today’s world want solutions to their problems, self-gratification, In this paper I would like to offer a distinction between recognition, profit, comfort, fun—so why should what seems to me three fundamentally different kinds of philosophers be different? Why shouldn’t they, too, join philosophical practice that are based on three different the market economy and sell what they have to offer to visions of the nature of philosophising. Through this those willing to pay? classification I will characterise a vision of philosophical practice that is close to my heart, which I feel is important My answer is that I don’t see anything wrong with helping and inspiring, but which is, unfortunately, often neglected. people feel better, on the contrary. But doing so is not really philosophy in the original, deep sense of the word. The Problem-Solving Approach It is no longer philo-sophia—a search inspired by a I think that in the eyes of many practitioners nowadays, yearning for wisdom, but rather a process dictated by the the main goal of philosophical practice is to help counselees client’s desire for comfort or security or satisfaction.
    [Show full text]
  • La Philosophie Du Son Roberto Casati
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Archive Electronique - Institut Jean Nicod La philosophie du son Roberto Casati To cite this version: Roberto Casati. La philosophie du son. Chapter 13 : Bibliographie, 1994. <ijn 00000529> HAL Id: ijn 00000529 http://jeannicod.ccsd.cnrs.fr/ijn 00000529 Submitted on 30 Jul 2004 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destin´eeau d´ep^otet `ala diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publi´esou non, lished or not. The documents may come from ´emanant des ´etablissements d'enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche fran¸caisou ´etrangers,des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou priv´es. BIBLIOGRAPHIE Almog, J., Perry, J. et Wettstein, H., 1989, Themes from Kaplan, New York, Oxford University Press. Alston, W.P., 1990, "Externalist Theories of Perception", Philoso- phy and Phenomenological Research, 50, 73-97. Anders-Stern, G., 1951, "The Acoustic Stereoscope", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 26,238-43. Anscombe, G.E.M., 1965, "The Intentionality of Sensation: À Grammatical Feature", in R.J. Butler, éd., Analytical Phi- losophy, Second Series. Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 158-80. Armstrong, D. M., 1960, Berkeley's Theory of Vision. Melbourne, Melbourne University Press. Armstrong, D.M., 1961, Perception and The Physical World. Lon- don, Routledge and Kegan Paul. Armstrong, D.M., 1962, Bodily Sensations. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul. Armstrong, D.M., 1968, À ~aterialistTheory of the Mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:Cs/9903016V1 [Cs.AI] 24 Mar 1999 .Truhu H Ae Eue“Eiin Orfrt G’ Pr AGM’S to Refer to “Revision” Use We Paper the Throughout 1
    Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 10 (1999) 117-167 Submitted 2/98; published 3/99 Modeling Belief in Dynamic Systems Part II: Revision and Update Nir Friedman [email protected] Institute of Computer Science Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 91904, ISRAEL http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/∼nir Joseph Y. Halpern [email protected] Computer Science Department Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/halpern Abstract The study of belief change has been an active area in philosophy and AI. In recent years two special cases of belief change, belief revision and belief update, have been studied in detail. In a companion paper (Friedman & Halpern, 1997), we introduce a new framework to model belief change. This framework combines temporal and epistemic modalities with a notion of plausibility, allowing us to examine the change of beliefs over time. In this paper, we show how belief revision and belief update can be captured in our framework. This allows us to compare the assumptions made by each method, and to better understand the principles underlying them. In particular, it shows that Katsuno and Mendelzon’s notion of belief update (Katsuno & Mendelzon, 1991a) depends on several strong assumptions that may limit its applicability in artificial intelligence. Finally, our analysis allow us to identify a notion of minimal change that underlies a broad range of belief change operations including revision and update. 1. Introduction The study of belief change has been an active area in philosophy and artificial intelligence. The focus of this research is to understand how an agent should change her beliefs as a result arXiv:cs/9903016v1 [cs.AI] 24 Mar 1999 of getting new information.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives on Ethical Leadership: an Overview Drs Ir Sophia Viet MTD
    Perspectives on ethical leadership: an overview drs ir Sophia Viet MTD Paper submitted to the International Congress on Public and Political Leadership 2016 Draft version. Do not site or quote without the author’s permission Abstract There is a growing scientific interest in ethical leadership of organizations as public confidence in organizational leaders continues to decline. Among scholarly communities there is considerable disagreement on the appropriate way to conceptualize, define and study ethical leadership. This disagreement is partly due to the ontological and epistemological differences between the scholarly communities, resulting in different views of organizations, on the role of organizational leadership in general, and on ethical leadership of organizations in particular. Because of the differences in their ontological and epistemological assumptions scholars endlessly debate the concept of ethical leadership. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the academic concepts of ethical leadership by classifying these concepts in terms of their ontological and epistemological assumptions and views of organizations into the modern, symbolic and the critical perspectives of postmodernism and communitarianism. Each category represents a particular set of perspectives on organizations, business ethics, and ethical leadership. The overview can serve as a guide to decode the academic debate and to determine the positions of the scholars participating in the debate. In addition it can serve as a multi-perspective-framework to study lay concepts of ethical leadership of (executive) directors of contemporary organizations. In this article the overview serves as a guide of how to classify some of the most common concepts in the debate on ethical leadership. Introduction There is a growing scientific interest in ethical leadership of organizations as public confidence in organizational leaders continues to decline.
    [Show full text]
  • Chad Van Schoelandt
    CHAD VAN SCHOELANDT Tulane University Department of Philosophy, New Orleans, LA [email protected] Employment 2015-present Assistant Professor, Tulane University, Department of Philosophy 2016-present Affiliated Fellow, George Mason University, F. A. HayeK Program for Advanced Study in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics Areas of Specialization Social and Political Philosophy Ethics Agency and Responsibility Philosophy, Politics & Economics Areas of Competence Applied Ethics (esp. Business, Environmental, Bio/Medical) History of Modern Philosophy Moral Psychology Education Ph.D., University of Arizona, Philosophy, 2015 M.A., University of Wisconsin - MilwauKee, Philosophy, 2010 B.A. (High Honors), University of California, Davis, Philosophy (political science minor), 2006 Publications Articles “Moral Accountability and Social Norms” Social Philosophy & Policy, Vol. 35, Issue 1, Spring 2018 “Consensus on What? Convergence for What? Four Models of Political Liberalism” (with Gerald Gaus) Ethics, Vol. 128, Issue 1, 2017: pp. 145-72 “Justification, Coercion, and the Place of Public Reason” Philosophical Studies, 172, 2015: pp. 1031-1050 “MarKets, Community, and Pluralism” The Philosophical Quarterly, Discussion, 64(254), 2014: pp. 144-151 "Political Liberalism, Ethos Justice, and Gender Equality" (with Blain Neufeld) Law and Philosophy 33(1), 2014: pp. 75-104 Chad Van Schoelandt CV Page 2 of 4 Book Chapters “A Public Reason Approach to Religious Exemption” Philosophy and Public Policy, Andrew I. Cohen (ed.), Rowman and Littlefield International,
    [Show full text]
  • Whose Who? the Case for a Kantian Right of Publicity
    HAEMMERLI TO PRINTER 01/12/00 11:21 AM Duke Law Journal VOLUME 49 NOVEMBER 1999 NUMBER 2 WHOSE WHO? THE CASE FOR A KANTIAN RIGHT OF PUBLICITY ALICE HAEMMERLI† ABSTRACT Rapidly developing technological opportunities for unauthorized uses of identity—from “virtual kidnapping” to digitalcasting—coin- cide with growing demand for a preemptive federal right of publicity that can replace the existing welter of inconsistent state laws. Progress is impeded, however, by intractable doctrinal confusion and academic hostility to the right as allegedly inimical to society’s cultural need to manipulate celebrity images. Because the right of publicity is tradi- tionally based on Lockean labor theory and analogized to intellectual property in created works, it is vulnerable to such attacks; to date, no serious attempt has been made to elaborate an alternative philosophi- cal justification that can withstand them. In this Article, Dean Haemmerli uses Kantian philosophy to justify an autonomy-based right of publicity. In doing so, she challenges both the traditional approach to the right of publicity and its postmodernist critiques. First, the Article’s proposed reconception of the right of publicity rejects the existing doctrinal bifurcation of publicity and pri- vacy rights and explicitly embraces both the economic and moral fac- ets of the individual’s need to control the use of his identity. Second, † Dean of Graduate Legal Studies and International Programs, Columbia Law School. A.B., Vassar College; M.Sc., London School of Economics; M.A., Ph.D., Harvard University; J.D., Columbia Law School. Thanks to Mike Dorf, George Fletcher, Jane Ginsburg, Kent Gre- enawalt, Ken Jones, John Manning, Henry Monaghan, Jeremy Waldron, and, in particular, Robert Ferguson, for their helpful comments on various drafts, and to Jack Kernochan for his encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • Anca Gheaus Curriculum Vitae
    Anca Gheaus curriculum vitae Curriculum Vitae WORK ADDRESS HOME ADDRESS Law, University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona Wiesenstrasse 16 [email protected] 80993 München EMPLOYMENT________________________________________________________________ 2020 – Assistant Professor, Central European University, Vienna 2016 – 2020 Ramon y Cajal Researcher, University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona 2014 – 2016 Researcher, Philosophy Department, Umeå University 2012 – 2016 De Velling Willis Fellow, Philosophy Department, University of Sheffield 2009 – 2011 Postdoctoral researcher, Philosophy Department, Erasmus University Rotterdam 2008 – 2009 Marie Curie Researcher, Equality Studies Centre, University College Dublin 2008 Researcher, Centre de Recherche en Etique Economique, Université Catholique de Lille 2004 – 2005 Fellow, New Europe College, Bucharest 2003 – 2005 Visiting lecturer, National School of Political and Administrative Science, Bucharest 2003 – 2004 Lecturer, Invisible College, Bucharest PUBLICATIONS________________________________________________________________ Books Child-Centred Childrearing, under contract with Oxford University Press Debating Surrogacy, under contract with Oxford University Press (with C. Straehle) Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Childhood and Children, Routledge, 2018, edited (with G. Calder and J. De Wispelaere) Journal special issues Special issue of Moral Philosophy and Politics on children’s rights, forthcoming 2020 (with S. Hohl) Special issue of the Journal of Applied Philosophy 35(S1) on “The Nature and Value of Childhood”, 2018 Special issue of the Journal of Medical Ethics 43(3), on “The Ethics of Health Incentive Programs”, 2017 (with V. Wild) Reference works The Ethics of Parenting, Routledge Encyclopedia Online, DOI 10.4324/9780415249126-L156-1, Routledge, 2020 Personal Relationship Goods, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, E. N. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/personal-relationship-goods/, Fall 2018 Gender policies in the workplace and the family, in A.
    [Show full text]
  • MARTIN HÄGGLUND Website
    MARTIN HÄGGLUND Website: www.martinhagglund.se APPOINTMENTS Birgit Baldwin Professor of Comparative Literature and Humanities, 2021- Chair of Comparative Literature, Yale University, 2015- Professor of Comparative Literature and Humanities, Yale University, 2014- Tenured Associate Professor of Comparative Literature and Humanities, Yale University, 2012-2014 Junior Fellow, Society of Fellows, Harvard University, 2009-2012 DEGREES Ph.D. Comparative Literature, Cornell University, 2011 M.A. Comparative Literature, emphasis in Critical Theory, SUNY Buffalo, 2005 B.A. General and Comparative Literature, Stockholm University, Sweden, 2001 PUBLICATIONS Books This Life: Secular Faith and Spiritual Freedom, Penguin Random House: Pantheon 2019: 465 pages. UK and Australia edition published by Profile Books. *Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Chinese, Korean, Macedonian, Swedish, Thai, and Turkish translations. *Winner of the René Wellek Prize. *Named a Best Book of the Year by The Guardian, The Millions, NRC, and The Sydney Morning Herald. Reviews: The New Yorker, The Guardian, The New Republic, New York Magazine, The Boston Globe, New Statesman, Times Higher Education (book of the week), Jacobin (two reviews), Booklist (starred review), Los Angeles Review of Books, Evening Standard, Boston Review, Psychology Today, Marx & Philosophy Review of Books, Dissent, USA Today, The Believer, The Arts Desk, Sydney Review of Books, The Humanist, The Nation, New Rambler Review, The Point, Church Life Journal, Kirkus Reviews, Public Books, Opulens Magasin, Humanisten, Wall Street Journal, Counterpunch, Spirituality & Health, Dagens Nyheter, Expressen, Arbetaren, De Groene Amsterdammer, Brink, Sophia, Areo Magazine, Spiked, Die Welt, Review 31, Parrhesia: A Journal of Critical Philosophy, Reason and Meaning, The Philosopher, boundary 2, Critical Inquiry, Radical Philosophy. Journal issues on the book: Los Angeles Review of Books (symposium with 6 essays on the book and a 3-part response by the author).
    [Show full text]