DOCSLIB.ORG

Freud and His Critics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Freud and His Critics Freud and his Critics Preferred Citation: Robinson, Paul. Freud and His Critics. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1993 1993. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft4w10062x/ Freud and his Critics Paul Robinson UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS Berkeley · Los Angeles · London © 1993 The Regents of the University of California For Dr. Carlos Esquivel Dr. Paul Nakazato and Dr. Barry Levin who gave me a new liver but left me my old spleen Preferred Citation: Robinson, Paul. Freud and His Critics. Berkeley: University of California Press, c1993 1993. http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft4w10062x/ For Dr. Carlos Esquivel Dr. Paul Nakazato and Dr. Barry Levin http://content.cdlib.org:8088/xtf/view?docId=ft4w10062x&chunk.id=0&doc.view=print (1 of 139)9/28/2005 11:36:52 AM Freud and his Critics who gave me a new liver but left me my old spleen Introduction: The Anti-Freudian Mood Everybody knows that Freud has fallen from grace. Whenever I have told someone that I was writing a book about him, the response has almost invariably been the same: “Hasn’t he been disproved?” Or I have been asked about the latest scandal from the newspapers: “Wasn’t he a cocaine addict?” “Didn’t he lie about his patients being sexually abused?” “Freud’s Reputation Shrinks a Little” read a recent front-page headline in the San Francisco Chronicle, introducing an account of Freud’s American patient Dr. Horace Frink, whom Freud apparently urged to divorce his wife and marry a former patient. In the same article Frank Sulloway is quoted: “Each of Freud’s published cases plays a role in the psychoanalytic legend. But the more detail you learn about each case, the stronger the image becomes of Freud twisting the facts to fit his theory.”[1] Hardly a month seems to pass without a story or a comment of this sort, whether in the popular press or in scholarly writings and reviews. The tide had already begun to turn in the 1970s. The first hint that Freud’s reputation was in trouble came from the new feminists. The year 1970 itself was particularly rough, when, in separate books, Kate Millett, Germaine Greer, Shulamith Firestone, and Eva Figes all took Freud to task for his reactionary views on women.[2] 1970 also witnessed the publication of Henri Ellenberger’s massive study The Discovery of the Unconscious, with its irreverent chapter on Freud; a few years later Paul Roazen’s Freud and His Followers continued in a similar vein. Ellenberger and Roazen were significant precursors of the more full-blooded criticism of the 1980s, but in retrospect they seem relatively mild and conventional. The past decade, by comparison, has brought an avalanche of anti-Freudian writings, their tone ever more hostile. Undeniably, Freud’s reputation has undergone a sea change. The contrast with the 1950s and 1960s, when I first read Freud, could hardly be greater. In the wake of Ernest Jones’s three-volume biography, published between 1953 and 1957, the American intellectual community seemed to have reached a consensus that Freud was not only the most important thinker of the twentieth century but one of the giants in the history of thought. The year 1952 saw him installed as the author of the final volume in Robert Maynard Hutchins’s Great Books of the Western World, placing him in the company of the immortals. In Freud and the Crisis of Our Culture (1955), Lionel Trilling, the voice of the liberal intellectual establishment, pronounced him the prime mover of modernism, and he was accorded a similar dignity, a decade later, in Richard Ellmann and Charles Feidelson’s widely used anthology, The Modern Tradition. Philip Rieff’s Freud: The Mind of the Moralist reflected perhaps most perfectly the stature he had attained by the year of its publication, 1961. Freud, Rieff argued, was the great moral intelligence of the century and the virtual creator of the modern conception of the self. Steven Marcus—who, with Lionel Trilling, edited a one- volume abridgment of Jones’s biography—summed up the mid-century consensus just as it was about to dissolve: http://content.cdlib.org:8088/xtf/view?docId=ft4w10062x&chunk.id=0&doc.view=print (2 of 139)9/28/2005 11:36:52 AM Freud and his Critics As the twentieth century moves through its last two decades, it becomes increasingly evident that the figure of Sigmund Freud remains as one of a very small handful of intellectual presences who have presided over the complex courses that Western thought and culture have taken throughout the entire epoch. His reputation and place in the history of the modern world have never stood higher or enjoyed a firmer security than they do today.[3] Writing a couple of years before Marcus, Frederick Crews more accurately sensed the winds of change that were about to buffet Freud’s creation. “Psychoanalysis,” Crews predicted, “will fade away just as mesmerism and phrenology did, and for the same reason: its exploded pretensions will deprive it of recruits.”[4] Unquestionably, the collapse of Freud’s reputation in the 1980s—not unlike the simultaneous collapse of Marx’s reputation—was an extraordinarily dramatic reversal of fortune. In one respect, Freud might seem to be alive and well in the contemporary intellectual world. I am thinking of the prestige that psychoanalysis still enjoys in literary studies, particularly those influenced by his French disciple Jacques Lacan. But analytically inclined literary critics have been largely uninterested in Freud himself, and, in any event, the Lacanian version of psychoanalysis favored by many literary critics is a very different intellectual animal from the Viennese original, lacking both Freud’s strong clinical base and his devotion to lucidity. One might even argue that the airy extravagance of recent literary theory—psychoanalytic or otherwise—has actually contributed to the pervasive sense of Freud’s disgrace: to many, the bad intellectual manners on display in deconstruction bear more than a family resemblance to the interpretive habits fostered by analysis. Frederick Crews, for one, is as dismissive of contemporary literary theory as he is of Freud, and for similar reasons. Crews’s fellow critic Nina Auerbach observes of Freud’s popularity in the literary community: “No sadder proof exists of the rift between literature and science than this new adherence to a Freudianism that is rapidly losing authority outside the circle of literary theory.”[5] The boom in psychoanalytic literary studies, then, seems to have at best ambiguous implications for Freud’s reputation as a thinker. For some time I have pondered how to respond to the new anti-Freudianism—how to take the measure of it, how to offer a corrective to its obvious excesses. If I thought of trying to chart the shift in all its manifestations, I was confronted with an embarrassment of riches: there were too many naysayers to choose among. Inevitably, however, some of them were more interesting and impressive than others, and eventually I hit on the tactic that has led to the present book: I would look very closely at the critics who offered the most systematic, original, and disturbing (if not always the most hostile) reinterpretations of Freud’s life and thought. These, I quickly became convinced, were precisely the three figures whose views of Freud I examine in the following chapters: the historian of science Frank Sulloway, the Sanskrit scholar and sometime psychoanalyst Jeffrey Masson, and the philosopher of science Adolf Grünbaum. Sulloway, Masson, and Grünbaum can hardly be said to constitute a school, because their interpretations of Freud are so utterly unlike. Nor do they appear to have influenced one another’s thinking. What they share is simply a marked hostility to Freud, as well as the talent and industry to have created counterviews whose weight and ingeniousness require that they be taken seriously. http://content.cdlib.org:8088/xtf/view?docId=ft4w10062x&chunk.id=0&doc.view=print (3 of 139)9/28/2005 11:36:52 AM Freud and his Critics Frank Sulloway studied with the sociobiologist Edward O. Wilson. His Freud, Biologist of the Mind, published in 1979, aims to place Freud within the tradition of evolutionary thought leading from Darwin to Wilson. The book argues that Freud’s psychoanalytic biographers fundamentally misrepresent his achievement when they portray him as a psychological thinker. This misrepresentation, Sulloway believes, was intended to create an image of Freud as an embattled innovator carrying on a lonely and heroic campaign against organic determinism. Freud, Biologist of the Mind—whose subtitle is Beyond the Psychoanalytic Legend—is thus as much an attack on the hagiographic proclivities of traditional scholarship on Freud as it is a revisionist interpretation of the psychoanalytic revolution. Freud’s ideas, Sulloway insists, are simply an offshoot of the Darwinian paradigm that has dominated biological thought from the late nineteenth century to the present. Jeffrey Masson is the best known of my three critics, mainly because in 1983 he was the subject of a withering New Yorker profile by the journalist Janet Malcolm, whom he subsequently sued for malicious misrepresentation (in a case that recently reached the Supreme Court). While employed as a professor of Sanskrit at the University of Toronto in the 1970s, Masson obtained analytic training and eventually rose within the Freudian establishment to become the editor of the Freud-Fliess correspondence. His highly visible defection from analysis in 1981 and the publication, in 1984, of The Assault on Truth: Freud’s Suppression of the Seduction Theory made him the most famous analytic renegade since Carl Jung. His book argues that the psychoanalytic revolution was based on Freud’s cowardly cover-up of his discoveries about the sexual abuse of children.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jones Robert W
    ‘Lain Beside Gold’ Narrative, Metaphor, and Energy in Freud and Conan Doyle Robert W. Jones PhD Candidate Aberystwyth University Contents Chapter 1 Introduction and Methodology ............................................................................. 3 1.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Secondary Material: Literature Review ........................................................................... 8 1.2.1 Critiques of Freud’s Narrativity ................................................................................ 8 1.2.2 Other Critiques ........................................................................................................ 11 1.2.3 Royle and the Uncanny Text ................................................................................... 14 1.2.4 Holland and the Practical Text ................................................................................ 17 1.3 Approaches ..................................................................................................................... 20 1.3.1 Metaphor .................................................................................................................. 23 1.3.2 The Text World ....................................................................................................... 30 1.3.3 Text as Performative Space ..................................................................................... 36 Chapter 2 Freud, Narrative, and the
    [Show full text]
  • Sigmund Freud Papers
    Sigmund Freud Papers A Finding Aid to the Papers in the Sigmund Freud Collection in the Library of Congress Digitization made possible by The Polonsky Foundation Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 2015 Revised 2016 December Contact information: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/mss.contact Additional search options available at: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.mss/eadmss.ms004017 LC Online Catalog record: http://lccn.loc.gov/mm80039990 Prepared by Allan Teichroew and Fred Bauman with the assistance of Patrick Holyfield and Brian McGuire Revised and expanded by Margaret McAleer, Tracey Barton, Thomas Bigley, Kimberly Owens, and Tammi Taylor Collection Summary Title: Sigmund Freud Papers Span Dates: circa 6th century B.C.E.-1998 Bulk Dates: (bulk 1871-1939) ID No.: MSS39990 Creator: Freud, Sigmund, 1856-1939 Extent: 48,600 items ; 141 containers plus 20 oversize and 3 artifacts ; 70.4 linear feet ; 23 microfilm reels Language: Collection material in German, with English and French Location: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Summary: Founder of psychoanalysis. Correspondence, holograph and typewritten drafts of writings by Freud and others, family papers, patient case files, legal documents, estate records, receipts, military and school records, certificates, notebooks, a pocket watch, a Greek statue, an oil portrait painting, genealogical data, interviews, research files, exhibit material, bibliographies, lists, photographs and drawings, newspaper and magazine clippings, and other printed matter. The collection documents many facets of Freud's life and writings; his associations with family, friends, mentors, colleagues, students, and patients; and the evolution of psychoanalytic theory and technique. Selected Search Terms The following terms have been used to index the description of this collection in the Library's online catalog.
    [Show full text]
  • Staircase, Berggasse 19, Vienna 2017
    Staircase, Berggasse 19, Vienna 2017 344 The Dream— an Imaging Process Monika Pessler As Sigmund Freud observes in The Interpretation of Dreams, «dreams think 345 essentially in images,» and while noises and sounds can at times make their ways into our imaginations, our dream-lives generally favor the visual.1 According to Freud, visual hallucinations replace the expression of thoughts in the form of language because dreams are characterized by «only those elements of their content which behave like images.»2 Another characteristic the psychoanalyst attributes to dreams, and one which is equally inherent to the arts, is an ability to «construct,» to represent an event that is «actually happening,» or to «dramatize an idea.»3 As such, Freud’s characterizations equally apply to artistic modes of rep- resentation: in particular conceptual art, which above all serves to visualize an idea. Greater significance is generally attached to the concept than to its rep- resentation—similar to psychoanalysis, which regards latent thoughts in the unconscious important components which manifest themselves dream images. Just consider Freud’s dictum that subjectively perceived «psychical reality» is more important than «material reality,» in other words, that psychically com- municated realities generally appear more factual than those regarded by the environment as given.4 Freud’s rejection of the «seduction theory» strengthened his awareness that mental ideas, fantasies, outstrip the factual, and are responsible for producing psychosomatic symptoms,5 and thus the formation of the dream itself is like- wise driven by «wish[es] from the unconscious.»6 In an effort to support its associative potential, art is conditioned on con- scious action.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9: the Psychology of the Unconscious
    24/10/2014 Chapter 9: The Psychology of the Unconscious Katie Collins, Michelle Guinchard, & Raven Warren Overview • Introduction • Freud and Scientific Psychology • The Formation of Psychoanalysis: 1884-1899 • Classical Psychoanalysis (1900-1919) • Revising and Extending Psychoanalysis: 1920- 1939 • The Fate of Psychoanalysis 1 24/10/2014 Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) Introduction Psychology of Consciousness Psychology of the Unconscious • Studied normal, adult mind • Freud studied abnormal through introspection. minds through therapeutic • Wanted to make an talk sessions. experimental science out of • Thought consciousness was philosophers’ traditional “a self-deceiving puppet of questions and theories. disgusting, primal impulses it dared not acknowledge”. 2 24/10/2014 Introduction • Freud did not perform experiments. • He used patients’ symptoms, dreams, and therapeutic talk to look for unconscious childhood and evolutionary experiences. • Called himself a conquistador, aka. adventurer. • Curious, daring, tenacious. • Thought adventurers would only be admired if they were successful or discovered something. Freud and Scientific Psychology • Three great blows to human self-esteem: 1. Copernicus’ demonstration that humans are not at the center of the universe. 2. Darwin’s demonstration that humans are part of nature, just like any other animal. 3. Freud’s demonstration that the human ego is not master in its own house. 3 24/10/2014 Freud and Academic Psychology • Academic psychology has mostly ignored or rejected psychoanalysis. • Psychology of consciousness rejected existence of unconscious. • Behaviourists rejected existence of mind. • Psychoanalysis developed as a branch of medicine, and only psychiatrists could be trained in psychoanalysis. Freud and Experimental Method • Considered psychoanalysis a science like any other, but did not try to study the unconscious experimentally.
    [Show full text]
  • Freud and Castration Carlo Bonomi
    Propriety of the Erich Fromm Document Center. For personal use only. Citation or publication of mate- rial prohibited without express written permission of the copyright holder. Eigentum des Erich Fromm Dokumentationszentrums. Nutzung nur für persönliche Zwecke. Veröffentli- chungen – auch von Teilen – bedürfen der schriftlichen Erlaubnis des Rechteinhabers. Freud and Castration Carlo Bonomi Paper presented at the Conference Psychoanalysis in the 20th Century Cultural Life, Reichenau, June 17-18, 1995 Copyright © 1995 and 2011 by Dr. Carlo Bonomi, Borgo Pinti 87, I-50121 Firenze, E-Mail: mail[at- symbol]carlobonomi.it. Introduction entities created by triangular speculations in which everybody takes the place of someone The topic of castration represents one of the else. Anatomy is ambiguous and the clitoris pro- most important links between the clinical and vides the illusion of power: thus only through the philosophical side of Freud's work. Freud's castration girls realize the expected passive sub- view of the human being is constantly associated mission, permitting the reality to be what it is. to castration. Primeval barbarism is represented Like in the ancient mystery cults and neo- by the image of the father who castrates the platonic philosophies (see Burkert 1987), also in sons, while civilization is represented by the Freud's vision of the world, the Being is con- ambivalent attenuation and substitution of cas- stantly risking to degenerate in Chaos and only tration by circumcision. In modern society, the castration permits to preserve stability. In circumcised penis, both sacred and damaged, Freud's view castration is, therefore, both the characterizes the essence of the Jew, represent- original trauma and the posthumous ing the mirror for the gentile fear of feminiza- (nachtr’glich) order of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • 9789461664174.Pdf
    A DARK TRACE SIGMUND FREUD ON THE SENSE OF GUILT FIGURES OF THE UNCONSCIOUS 8 Editorial Board PHILIPPE VAN HAUTE (Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands) TOMAS GEYSKENS (Catholic University Leuven, Belgium) PAUL MOYAERT (Catholic University Leuven, Belgium) MONIQUE DAVID-MÉNARD (Université Paris VII – Diderot, France) VLADIMIR SAFATLE (University of Sao Paolo, Brazil) CHARLES SHEPHERDSON (State University of New York at Albany, USA) A Dark Trace Sigmund Freud on the Sense of Guilt Herman Westerink The translation was funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). Original title: Het schuldgevoel bij Freud. Een duister spoor. Authorized translation from the Dutch language edition published by Uitgeverij Boom, Amsterdam. © 2005 Dutch language edition by Uitgeverij Boom, Amsterdam (The Netherlands). © 2009/2013 English language edition by Leuven University Press / Universitaire Pers Leuven / Presses Universitaires de Louvain. Minderbroedersstraat 4, B-3000 Leuven (Belgium) ePDF published in 2021 by Leuven University Press / Presses Universitaires de Louvain / Universitaire Pers Leuven. Minderbroedersstraat 4, B-3000 Leuven (Belgium). © 2021 Herman Westerink This ePDF is published under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Non-Derivative 4.0 Licence. Further details about Creative Commons licences are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Attribution should include the following information: Herman Westerink. A Dark Trace: Sigmund Freud on the Sense of Guilt. Leuven: Leuven University Press,
    [Show full text]
  • 9781782206521.Pdf
    Ferenczi’s Influence on Contemporary Psychoanalytic Traditions This collection covers the great variety topics relevant for understanding the importance of Sándor Ferenczi and his influence on contemporary psychoanalysis. Pre-eminent Ferenczi scholars were solicited to contribute succinct reviews of their fields of expertise. The book is divided in five sections. ‘The historico-biographical’ describes Ferenczi’s childhood and student days, his marriage, brief analyses with Freud, his correspondences and contributions to the daily press in Budapest, exploration of his patients’ true identities, and a paper about his untimely death. ‘The development of Ferenczi’s ideas’ reviews his ideas before his first encounter with psychoanalysis, his relationship with peers, friendship with Groddeck, emancipation from Freud, and review of the importance of his Clinical Diary. The third section reviews Ferenczi’s clinical concepts and work: trauma, unwelcome child, wise baby, identification with aggressor, mutual analysis, and many others. In ‘Echoes’, we follow traces of Ferenczi’s influence on virtually all traditions in contemporary psychoanalysis: interpersonal, independent, Kleinian, Lacanian, relational, etc. Finally, there are seven ‘application’ chapters about Ferenczi’s ideas and the issues of politics, gender and development. Aleksandar Dimitrijević, PhD, is interim professor of psychoanalysis and clinical psychology at the International Psychoanalytic University, Berlin, Germany. He is a member of the Belgrade Psychoanalytical Society (IPA) and Faculty at the Serbian Association of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapists (EFPP), and the editor or co-editor of ten books or special journal issues, as well as author of many conceptual and empirical papers, about attachment theory and research, psychoanalytic education, psychoanalysis and the arts. Gabriele Cassullo is a psychologist, psychotherapist, doctor in research in human sciences and interim professor in psychology at the Department of Psychology, University of Turin.
    [Show full text]
  • Artículos Destacados. the FREUD-FERENCZI CONTROVERSY in LIGHT of EMMA ECKSTEIN's CIRCUMCISION
    CLÁSICOS DESTACADOS. INDEPSI-ALSF. THE FREUD-FERENCZI CONTROVERSY IN LIGHT OF EMMA ECKSTEIN'S CIRCUMCISION. Carlo Bonomi INTRODUCTION On 2 September 1932, while on his way to the Wiesbaden, conference, Sándor Ferenczi decided to stop in Vienna in order to personally read to Freud the paper that he planned to contribute. This was his famous paper on the “Confusion of tongues between the adults and the child” (Ferenczi, 1933/ 1955), a milestone in the psychoanalytic theory and treatment of trauma. Ferenczi’s important ideas and profound reformulation of trauma theory were, however, met by Freud with an icy reception. The consequences of this last encounter between Freud and Ferenczi were dramatic: Ferenczi, who passed away just seven months later, at the age of 59, lost Freud’s protection, and this acted as a prompt and releasing factor for a collective reaction, by which Ferenczi and his work was banished from the psychoanalytic community (Bonomi, 1998). Starting with the publication of his Clinical diary in 1985, the work of Ferenczi has begun to be rediscovered, marking a new phase in the history of psychoanalysis. After three decades, this process is still going on and is far from being concluded. The aim of this paper is to add a further element, which might shed a new light into Ferenczi’s attempt to resume Freud’s initial idea that traumatic memories were the building blocks on which the entire edifice of psychoanalysis rested. I am referring to the trauma of Emma Eckstein’s circumcision. There are no elements that suggest that Ferenczi had a conscious knowledge of the role played by Emma in the triangle with Freud and Fliess in the years of the foundation of psychoanalysis.
    [Show full text]
  • As Figuras Paternas, Um Assunto Coletivo
    Michèle Bompard-Porte, Tradução: Bernardo Maranhão, Revisão da tradução: Carlos Teoria Antônio Andradepsicanalítica Mello As figuras paternas, um assunto coletivo Michèle Bompard-Porte Tradução: Bernardo Maranhão Revisão da tradução: Carlos Antônio Andrade Mello Resumo Segundo Freud, a existência de figuras paternas em um grupo humano é contingente e depende das dinâmicas coletivas prevalentes. Uma recapitulação sucinta das três dinâmicas paradigmáticas segundo Freud – horda, matriarcado, grupo fraternal – permite concluir que a invenção dos pais no seio dessas dinâmicas advém mais propriamente da lógica fálica que do reconhecimento da alteridade dos sexos. Assim, a autoridade dos pais depende de uma regressão infantil, e tornar-se adulto psíquico implica separar-se disso. Palavras-chave Pais, Psicologia coletiva, Horda, Matriarcado, Grupo fraterno, Clivagem, Onipotência. Em setembro de 1897, Freud não acredita surpresa de que na totalidade dos casos o mais em sua neurótica (FREUD, [1887-1904] pai deva ser acusado como perverso, in- 1986). O delírio a dois (Freud e Fliess), do clusive o meu” – tal havia sido a desastrosa qual Emma Eckstein foi a vítima, guarda, entrada dos pais na psicanálise. Terceira, sem dúvida, relação com essa mudança a ideia fundadora da psicanálise: “[...] teórica.1 No entanto, a psicanálise foi a percepção certeira de que não há no fundada dessa maneira. A primeira teoria inconsciente signo da realidade, de modo da sedução era, com efeito, uma teoria que não se pode distinguir a verdade da local, extrínseca e unicausal dos sintomas. ficção investida de afeto (Por conseguinte, A afirmação segundo a qual “não há no a solução continua sendo que a fantasia inconsciente signo de realidade, de modo sexual se aproveita regularmente do tema que não se pode distinguir a verdade da dos pais)”.
    [Show full text]
  • ‚So This Is the Strong Sex.' Women in Psychoanalysis
    ‚So this is the strong Sex.‘ Women in Psychoanalysis Special exhibition at the Sigmund Freud Museum, 16/10/2015 – 12/6/2016 The Sigmund Freud Museum is dedicating the special exhibition ‘So this is the strong Sex.’ Women in Psychoanalysis beginning on 16 October to women from the early history of psychoanalysis. Marie Bonaparte, Helene Deutsch, Emma Eckstein, Anna Freud, Lou Andreas-Salomé and Sabina Spielrein had a major influence on the work of Sigmund Freud and on the development of psychoanalysis. ‘So this is the strong sex.’ – Emma Eckstein is said to have once greeted Sigmund Freud with this ironic allusion. Succinctly, this quotation conveys the possible new interpretations of predominant gender roles. As patients, these women provided Sigmund Freud with the basis for his discovery of the unconscious; the “father of psychoanalysis” himself confirms how he developed his treatment method known as the “talking cure” together with them. In addition to their practical work as analysts, these protagonists made substantial contributions to the development of psychoanalytical theory, inspiring Freud’s works or even anticipating them, as in the case of Sabina Spielrein. Their involvement in the international dissemination and global institutionalisation of psychoanalysis is equally undisputed: Sabina Spielrein in Switzerland and Russia, Lou Andreas-Salomé in Germany, Marie Bonaparte in France, Helene Deutsch in the USA, and Anna Freud in England. The biographies and works of these different figures, all impressive, are focused on in the exhibition along with Freud’s theoretical work from the perspective of feminism, gender and queer studies criticism. Using specially designed screens to divide the exhibition rooms into several segments, the exhibition is dedicating a separate room to each of the six female pioneers of psychoanalysis with the aim of spotlighting their life and work in a suitable manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Sigmund Freud - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Page 1 of 10
    Sigmund Freud - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 of 10 Sigmund Freud From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Freud redirects to here. For other Freuds, see Freud (disambiguation) Sigmund Freud (May 6, 1856 - September 23, 1939) was an Austrian psychiatrist and the founder of the psychoanalytic school of psychology, a movement that popularized the theory that unconscious motives control much behavior. He became interested in hypnotism and how it could be used to help the mentally ill. He later abandoned hypnotism in favor of free association and dream analysis in developing what is now known as "the talking cure." These became the core elements of psychoanalysis. Freud was especially interested in what was then called hysteria, and is now called conversion syndrome. The name Freud is generally pronounced Froid in English and Froit in German. Freud's theories, and his treatment of patients, were controversial in 19th century Vienna, and remain hotly debated today. Freud's ideas are often discussed and analyzed as works of literature, philosophy, and general culture in addition to continuing debate around them as scientific and medical treatises. He is commonly referred to as "the father of psychoanalysis." Sigmund Freud Contents 1 His life 2 Freud's innovations 2.1 Early work 2.2 The unconscious 2.3 Psychosexual development 2.4 The id, ego and superego 2.5 Defense mechanisms 2.6 The life and death instincts 2.7 Speculation on religion 3 Freud's legacy 4 Patients 5 Major works 6 See also 7 Books critical of Freud and psychoanalysis 8 External links His life Sigismund Schlomo Freud was born into a Jewish family in Freiberg (Příbor), Moravia, the Austrian Empire (now the Czech Republic).
    [Show full text]
  • Freud's Baby, Fliess's May Be
    FREUD’S BABY, FLIESS’S MAYBE Daniel Boyarin “I recover this drama not to unseat Freud, but to reupholster him for the purposes of gay criticism.” Wayne Koestenbaum Something happened around 1890, something that John C. Fout has called 66 a ‘new,’ historically specific stage in the history of sexuality” (389). It is quite clear that our reading of what exactly happened around 1890 will be contingent in large measure on our assessment of Freud’s of the Oedipus complex and thus of psychoanalysis, just at this time. How to inter- pret this foundational event, however, is less clear. According to the “official” accounts endorsed by the psychoanalytic establishment, what hap- pened was simply that Freud’s attainment of psychological maturity- marked not least by the “over~oming~~of homoerotic desire-led to an advance in the theory of sexuality that made possible a great scientific dis- covery (Kris). According to critiques of Freud that currently enjoy hege- mony, on the other hand, the story is one of betrayal and abuse (Masson). According to this revisionist version, Freud originally asserted that abuse of girls by adult male relatives (usually fathers) is the cause of later hysteria in women, but he abandoned this correct understanding in favor of a theory of infantile sexual desire and fantasy because the “true” account was threaten- ing to patriarchal privilege. Neither of these extremes will do, neither Saint Sigmund nor Freud the fraud. There is something that hagiographers and demonologists of Freud alike have left out of accounts of this stage in the history of sexuality, the ways in which the foundations of psychoanalysis and the Oedipus complex are specifically embroiled in the homophobic-anti- Semitic movement of the fin de sihcle.’ GLQ, Vol.
    [Show full text]