DOCSLIB.ORG

Dark Matter and the Universe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dark Matter and the Universe ! Dark Matter and the Universe Topic 4 Hunting for Baryonic Dark Matter Black Holes, Dead Stars, Neutrinos & the Primordial Soup Why is the dark matter not ordinary matter we can not see?! Contents of Topic 4 In this Topic we move to consider the possible Baryonic candidates for dark matter, their nature and the arguments that eventually lead to the conclusion that dark matter can not be composed of hidden Baryons. We cover: " Gas, dust, rocks and smaller material as dark matter " Massive Astronomical Compact Halo Objects (MACHOs), Brown Dwarfs, Dead Stars and Stellar Remnants " Hunting for MACHOs with Gravitational Microlensing " Microlensing theory, Amplification Factor and Einstein Time " Very Massive Objects (VMOs), Black Holes, & Neutron Stars " Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, the CMBR and #B " The death of Baryonic Dark Matter " First ideas on particle dark matter - Antimatter and Neutrinos Baryonic Dark Matter Candidates " It is clear from the evidence shown that there are copious amounts of Missing Matter or Dark Matter in the Universe. " Whatever this material is it must not give off light or interact with light, otherwise we would see it! " A first step to unravelling this huge mystery, investigated by the first scientists involved, is to consider objects or classes of ordinary material, i.e. Baryonic Material, that are known to exist but that might be hidden from us. An example is Hydrogen Gas: " The term Baryon basically refers to protons and neutrons. Strewn throughout the Universe are "trees" of H gas that absorb light from distant objects. For instance they leave absorption lines in distant quasar's spectra. Baryonic Dark Matter Candidates " A more complete list of possible Baryonic Candidates, roughly in order of size, is as follows: (1)! Gas - hot and cold gas, hydrogen and helium (2)! Snowballs - particles of frozen gas (3)! Dust - particles that include heavier elements like Si (4)! Rocks and Small Planets - including asteroid size objects (5)! Dim Stars - including Brown Dwarfs and Black Dwarfs (6)! Neutron Stars - remnants of supernovae (7)! Black Holes - remnants of bigger supernovae " Candidates labelled (5) have been the subject of intense searches in the halo of our galaxy. They are often called: Massive Astronomical Compact Halo Objects (MACHOs) " Candidates (6) and (7) come under the heading Very Massive Object (VMO) Gas, Dust and Smaller Material " This type of material is actually hard to hide in the Universe. It can produce spectral lines if hot or absorption lines due to background stars. Gas as Baryonic Dark Matter " A first obvious Baryonic Candidate might be objects made of hydrogen or helium gas, the most abundant elements in the Universe. But each class of this has a problem:! (1)!so called “Snowballs” (small lumps of frozen hydrogen) – it turns out that these would be expected to evaporate. (2)!Hot Gas - this is expected to emit x-rays, but very little such radiation is seen. (3)!Cool Neutral Hydrogen Gas – this should absorb background light from distant objects like quasars, but not much of this absorption is seen either.! Dust, Rocks and Small Planets " So what about material with elements more complex than hydrogen, forming dust, rocks, asteroids or even small planets. It certainly exists, here is an example Porous Chondrite interplanetary dust particle. " But if the Universe is filled with a lot of this stuff then stars should be contaminated with significant abundance of “Metals”. This is not seen. We see mainly hydrogen again. " Also rocks and dust can be observed by obscuration of background light. It is actually hard to hide in the Universe. It can produce spectral lines if hot or absorption lines due to background stars. Not enough of this phenomena is seen. None of this can explain the dark matter problem. MACHOs " MACHOs are another possibility, basically Very Low Luminosity Stars, sometimes called Dead Stars or Stellar Remnants, stars known as Brown Dwarfs and Jupiter-like Objects. These objects would have mass < ~0.08 M⦿. " Below this mass they never attain a high enough central temperature for the fusion reactions that convert H into He normal in larger mass stars to start and produce high luminosity. " The only energy they can radiate comes from Gravitational Energy as they slowly contract to a final dense state. There is an initial fairly fast contraction which can cause significant luminosity but it does not last long. Hunting for MACHOs " So MACHOs can not be seen with telescopes but it is possible to use so-called Gravitational Microlensing (GM). This exciting method to search for faint stars in the halo of our galaxy was first proposed by Bohdan Paczynski in 1986. " GM is a variant of the lensing described earlier but here the lens is a MACHO in the halo of our galaxy (a much smaller object than considered before) and the source is a star in a nearby galaxy, usually the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). Bohdan MACHO Paczynski Star in nearby galaxy Earth Gravitational Microlensing Theory " We can use the same equations for GM as previously used for Gravitational Lensing. However, in Microlensing there are a few interesting differences to what is happening: (1)!For a small lens like a Brown Dwarf we might expect an Einstein Ring or Multiple Images, but in practice the light bending is too small for this to be resolved in a telescope on Earth. Instead we see a general brightening resulting from the multiple images being superposed on each other. MOVING MACHO (2)!Another vital difference is that STAR IN OBSERVER we expect the MACHO to be LMC ON EARTH moving in the halo such that the alignment between Observer, MACHO and Lens that produces this brightening will only occur for a timescale of ~days to months. Microlensing Example " The image here shows an actual example candidate MACHO Event. We see a sequence of pictures of a small section of a star field taken over a period of a few weeks. Note how one of the stars in the centre gets brighter and then dims. " A plot of the brightness vs. time gives us a characteristic Light Curve for the event as opposite. We see a Transient Brightening of the background star as the MACHO passes by. Microlensing Theory? " We can use the same equations to describe Microlensing as we examined for general lensing previously. r here is distance of the MACHO from the line-of-sight r source observer MACHO (lens) " The MACHO moves across the line-of-sight so r changes with time, i.e. r(t). We can call it the angular separation of the lens from the observer-source line-of-sight vs. time. " The Impact Parameter b, as defined previously, is effectively the instantaneous value of r. The Amplification Factor " The source brightness is amplified by an Amplification Factor A that depends only on how close the alignment, r(t), is between observer, lens, and source. It is given by: here u(t) is defined in terms of r(t), the angular separation of the lens from the observer-source line-of-sight, divided by the Einstein Radius θE and is given by: where t0 is the time at Peak Brightness and u0 = u(t = t0). τE is the Einstein Time, the time taken by the lens to travel the angular distance θE. u = 0 corresponds to perfect alignment. The Amplification Factor ‣ So when t = t0, we have Peak Brightness. ‣ The smaller u becomes, the bigger the amplitude A, and also the smaller the value for u0 = u(t = t0), the bigger is the value that the Amplification Factor A can achieve. ‣ In the extreme case that u0 = 0, which corresponds to a situation where we get perfect alignment of source, lens and observer at t = t0, then A would become infinite. ‣ Here is an example light curve u0 for a point like MACHO for different values of u0 vs. time. ‣ The vertical axis is logarithmic multiplied with 2.5 to obtain the astronomical logarithmic brightness measure Magnitude. How to Identify a MACHO ‣ Microlensing differs from Macrolensing (the Strong and Weak Lensing with galaxies) in that the value of u changes significantly in a short period of time, ~days to months. ‣ Note also that observation of a MACHO Event can allow us to determine a value for the Einstein Time τE, but this is not sufficient to allow the MACHO mass to be determined because we also need to know the distance D and the velocity of the MACHO vM. ‣ In other words the main observable, the Einstein Time, is a degenerate function of the lens mass, distance and velocity. We can not determine them from a single event. ‣ So in practice to get at the masses we need multiple events and estimates of the distances and velocities. How to Identify a MACHO ‣ Another issue is that many stars naturally have variability. It is important to distinguish such stars from MACHO Events. ‣ This can be done because MACHOs have three particular characteristics: (1)! A MACHO Event should never repeat (they are too rare). (2)! The Light Curve for a MACHO should be symmetric in ! time, i.e. rising and falling with the same shape. (3)!The magnitude of the Light Amplification should be the ! ! same in all wavelengths e.g. the blue and red wavebands !as typically measured in astronomical observations. " This difference arises because the change in light for a MACHO concerns purely gravitational effects, whereas in a variable star, such as a Ceyfert Variable, the changes are due to physics processes to do with the star itself. MACHOs Found! or Not " Several extensive searches have been undertaken for MACHOs in the halo of our galaxy by observing many stars in the LMC over several years.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dark Energy and Dark Matter As Inertial Effects Introduction
    Dark Energy and Dark Matter as Inertial Effects Serkan Zorba Department of Physics and Astronomy, Whittier College 13406 Philadelphia Street, Whittier, CA 90608 [email protected] ABSTRACT A disk-shaped universe (encompassing the observable universe) rotating globally with an angular speed equal to the Hubble constant is postulated. It is shown that dark energy and dark matter are cosmic inertial effects resulting from such a cosmic rotation, corresponding to centrifugal (dark energy), and a combination of centrifugal and the Coriolis forces (dark matter), respectively. The physics and the cosmological and galactic parameters obtained from the model closely match those attributed to dark energy and dark matter in the standard Λ-CDM model. 20 Oct 2012 Oct 20 ph] - PACS: 95.36.+x, 95.35.+d, 98.80.-k, 04.20.Cv [physics.gen Introduction The two most outstanding unsolved problems of modern cosmology today are the problems of dark energy and dark matter. Together these two problems imply that about a whopping 96% of the energy content of the universe is simply unaccounted for within the reigning paradigm of modern cosmology. arXiv:1210.3021 The dark energy problem has been around only for about two decades, while the dark matter problem has gone unsolved for about 90 years. Various ideas have been put forward, including some fantastic ones such as the presence of ghostly fields and particles. Some ideas even suggest the breakdown of the standard Newton-Einstein gravity for the relevant scales. Although some progress has been made, particularly in the area of dark matter with the nonstandard gravity theories, the problems still stand unresolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Matter and the Early Universe: a Review Arxiv:2104.11488V1 [Hep-Ph
    Dark matter and the early Universe: a review A. Arbey and F. Mahmoudi Univ Lyon, Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, Institut de Physique des 2 Infinis de Lyon, UMR 5822, 69622 Villeurbanne, France Theoretical Physics Department, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Institut Universitaire de France, 103 boulevard Saint-Michel, 75005 Paris, France Abstract Dark matter represents currently an outstanding problem in both cosmology and particle physics. In this review we discuss the possible explanations for dark matter and the experimental observables which can eventually lead to the discovery of dark matter and its nature, and demonstrate the close interplay between the cosmological properties of the early Universe and the observables used to constrain dark matter models in the context of new physics beyond the Standard Model. arXiv:2104.11488v1 [hep-ph] 23 Apr 2021 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Standard Cosmological Model 3 2.1 Friedmann-Lema^ıtre-Robertson-Walker model . 4 2.2 A quick story of the Universe . 5 2.3 Big-Bang nucleosynthesis . 8 3 Dark matter(s) 9 3.1 Observational evidences . 9 3.1.1 Galaxies . 9 3.1.2 Galaxy clusters . 10 3.1.3 Large and cosmological scales . 12 3.2 Generic types of dark matter . 14 4 Beyond the standard cosmological model 16 4.1 Dark energy . 17 4.2 Inflation and reheating . 19 4.3 Other models . 20 4.4 Phase transitions . 21 5 Dark matter in particle physics 21 5.1 Dark matter and new physics . 22 5.1.1 Thermal relics . 22 5.1.2 Non-thermal relics .
    [Show full text]
  • Adrien Christian René THOB
    THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MORPHOLOGY AND KINEMATICS OF GALAXIES AND ITS DEPENDENCE ON DARK MATTER HALO STRUCTURE IN SIMULATED GALAXIES Adrien Christian René THOB A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Liverpool John Moores University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 26 April 2019 To my grand-parents, René Roumeaux, Christian Thob, Yvette Roumeaux (née Bajaud) and Anne-Marie Thob (née Léglise). ii Abstract Galaxies are among nature’s most majestic and diverse structures. They can play host to as few as several thousands of stars, or as many as hundreds of billions. They exhibit a broad range of shapes, sizes, colours, and they can inhabit vastly differing cosmic environments. The physics of galaxy formation is highly non-linear and in- volves a variety of physical mechanisms, precluding the development of entirely an- alytic descriptions, thus requiring that theoretical ideas concerning the origin of this diversity are tested via the confrontation of numerical models (or “simulations”) with observational measurements. The EAGLE project (which stands for Evolution and Assembly of GaLaxies and their Environments) is a state-of-the-art suite of such cos- mological hydrodynamical simulations of the Universe. EAGLE is unique in that the ill-understood efficiencies of feedback mechanisms implemented in the model were calibrated to ensure that the observed stellar masses and sizes of present-day galaxies were reproduced. We investigate the connection between the morphology and internal 9:5 kinematics of the stellar component of central galaxies with mass M? > 10 M in the EAGLE simulations. We compare several kinematic diagnostics commonly used to describe simulated galaxies, and find good consistency between them.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Standard Model: Successes and Problems
    Searching for new particles at the Large Hadron Collider James Hirschauer (Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory) Sambamurti Memorial Lecture : August 7, 2017 Our current theory of the most fundamental laws of physics, known as the standard model (SM), works very well to explain many aspects of nature. Most recently, the Higgs boson, predicted to exist in the late 1960s, was discovered by the CMS and ATLAS collaborations at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN in 2012 [1] marking the first observation of the full spectrum of predicted SM particles. Despite the great success of this theory, there are several aspects of nature for which the SM description is completely lacking or unsatisfactory, including the identity of the astronomically observed dark matter and the mass of newly discovered Higgs boson. These and other apparent limitations of the SM motivate the search for new phenomena beyond the SM either directly at the LHC or indirectly with lower energy, high precision experiments. In these proceedings, the successes and some of the shortcomings of the SM are described, followed by a description of the methods and status of the search for new phenomena at the LHC, with some focus on supersymmetry (SUSY) [2], a specific theory of physics beyond the standard model (BSM). 1 Standard model: successes and problems The standard model of particle physics describes the interactions of fundamental matter particles (quarks and leptons) via the fundamental forces (mediated by the force carrying particles: the photon, gluon, and weak bosons). The Higgs boson, also a fundamental SM particle, plays a central role in the mechanism that determines the masses of the photon and weak bosons, as well as the rest of the standard model particles.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Gamma and X-Ray Interactions in Matter
    Photon interactions in matter Gamma- and X-Ray • Compton effect • Photoelectric effect Interactions in Matter • Pair production • Rayleigh (coherent) scattering Chapter 7 • Photonuclear interactions F.A. Attix, Introduction to Radiological Kinematics Physics and Radiation Dosimetry Interaction cross sections Energy-transfer cross sections Mass attenuation coefficients 1 2 Compton interaction A.H. Compton • Inelastic photon scattering by an electron • Arthur Holly Compton (September 10, 1892 – March 15, 1962) • Main assumption: the electron struck by the • Received Nobel prize in physics 1927 for incoming photon is unbound and stationary his discovery of the Compton effect – The largest contribution from binding is under • Was a key figure in the Manhattan Project, condition of high Z, low energy and creation of first nuclear reactor, which went critical in December 1942 – Under these conditions photoelectric effect is dominant Born and buried in • Consider two aspects: kinematics and cross Wooster, OH http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Compton sections http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=22551 3 4 Compton interaction: Kinematics Compton interaction: Kinematics • An earlier theory of -ray scattering by Thomson, based on observations only at low energies, predicted that the scattered photon should always have the same energy as the incident one, regardless of h or • The failure of the Thomson theory to describe high-energy photon scattering necessitated the • Inelastic collision • After the collision the electron departs
    [Show full text]
  • Particle Dark Matter an Introduction Into Evidence, Models, and Direct Searches
    Particle Dark Matter An Introduction into Evidence, Models, and Direct Searches Lecture for ESIPAP 2016 European School of Instrumentation in Particle & Astroparticle Physics Archamps Technopole XENON1T January 25th, 2016 Uwe Oberlack Institute of Physics & PRISMA Cluster of Excellence Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz http://xenon.physik.uni-mainz.de Outline ● Evidence for Dark Matter: ▸ The Problem of Missing Mass ▸ In galaxies ▸ In galaxy clusters ▸ In the universe as a whole ● DM Candidates: ▸ The DM particle zoo ▸ WIMPs ● DM Direct Searches: ▸ Detection principle, physics inputs ▸ Example experiments & results ▸ Outlook Uwe Oberlack ESIPAP 2016 2 Types of Evidences for Dark Matter ● Kinematic studies use luminous astrophysical objects to probe the gravitational potential of a massive environment, e.g.: ▸ Stars or gas clouds probing the gravitational potential of galaxies ▸ Galaxies or intergalactic gas probing the gravitational potential of galaxy clusters ● Gravitational lensing is an independent way to measure the total mass (profle) of a foreground object using the light of background sources (galaxies, active galactic nuclei). ● Comparison of mass profles with observed luminosity profles lead to a problem of missing mass, usually interpreted as evidence for Dark Matter. ● Measuring the geometry (curvature) of the universe, indicates a ”fat” universe with close to critical density. Comparison with luminous mass: → a major accounting problem! Including observations of the expansion history lead to the Standard Model of Cosmology: accounting defcit solved by ~68% Dark Energy, ~27% Dark Matter and <5% “regular” (baryonic) matter. ● Other lines of evidence probe properties of matter under the infuence of gravity: ▸ the equation of state of oscillating matter as observed through fuctuations of the Cosmic Microwave Background (acoustic peaks).
    [Show full text]
  • DARK MATTER and NEUTRINOS Arxiv:1711.10564V1 [Physics.Pop-Ph]
    Physics Education 1 dateline DARK MATTER AND NEUTRINOS Gazal Sharma1, Anu2 and B. C. Chauhan3 Department of Physics & Astronomical Science School of Physical & Material Sciences Central University of Himachal Pradesh (CUHP) Dharamshala, Kangra (HP) INDIA-176215. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] (Submitted 03-08-2015) Abstract The Keplerian distribution of velocities is not observed in the rotation of large scale structures, such as found in the rotation of spiral galaxies. The deviation from Keplerian distribution provides compelling evidence of the presence of non-luminous matter i.e. called dark matter. There are several astrophysical motivations for investigating the dark matter in and around the galaxy as halo. In this work we address various theoretical and experimental indications pointing towards the existence of this unknown form of matter. Amongst its constituents neutrino is one of the most prospective candidates. We know the neutrinos oscillate and have tiny masses, but there are also signatures for existence of heavy and light sterile neutrinos and possibility of their mixing. Altogether, the role of neutrinos is of great interests in cosmology and understanding dark matter. arXiv:1711.10564v1 [physics.pop-ph] 23 Nov 2017 1 Introduction revealed in 2013 that our Universe contains 68:3% of dark energy, 26:8% of dark matter, and only 4:9% of the Universe is known mat- As a human being the biggest surprise for us ter which includes all the stars, planetary sys- was, that the Universe in which we live in tems, galaxies, and interstellar gas etc.. This is mostly dark.
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Description of Dark Matter As a Viscous Fluid
    Motivation Framework Perturbation theory Effective viscosity Results FRG improvement Conclusions Effective Description of Dark Matter as a Viscous Fluid Nikolaos Tetradis University of Athens Work with: D. Blas, S. Floerchinger, M. Garny, U. Wiedemann . N. Tetradis University of Athens Effective Description of Dark Matter as a Viscous Fluid Motivation Framework Perturbation theory Effective viscosity Results FRG improvement Conclusions Distribution of dark and baryonic matter in the Universe Figure: 2MASS Galaxy Catalog (more than 1.5 million galaxies). N. Tetradis University of Athens Effective Description of Dark Matter as a Viscous Fluid Motivation Framework Perturbation theory Effective viscosity Results FRG improvement Conclusions Inhomogeneities Inhomogeneities are treated as perturbations on top of an expanding homogeneous background. Under gravitational attraction, the matter overdensities grow and produce the observed large-scale structure. The distribution of matter at various redshifts reflects the detailed structure of the cosmological model. Define the density field δ = δρ/ρ0 and its spectrum hδ(k)δ(q)i ≡ δD(k + q)P(k): . N. Tetradis University of Athens Effective Description of Dark Matter as a Viscous Fluid 31 timation method in its entirety, but it should be equally valid. 7.3. Comparison to other results Figure 35 compares our results from Table 3 (modeling approach) with other measurements from galaxy surveys, but must be interpreted with care. The UZC points may contain excess large-scale power due to selection function effects (Padmanabhan et al. 2000; THX02), and the an- gular SDSS points measured from the early data release sample are difficult to interpret because of their extremely broad window functions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Derivation of Modified Newtonian Dynamics
    Journal of The Korean Astronomical Society http://dx.doi.org/10.5303/JKAS.2013.46.2.93 46: 93 ∼ 96, 2013 April ISSN:1225-4614 c 2013 The Korean Astronomical Society. All Rights Reserved. http://jkas.kas.org A DERIVATION OF MODIFIED NEWTONIAN DYNAMICS Sascha Trippe Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea E-mail : [email protected] (Received February 14, 2013; Revised March 20, 2013; Accepted March 29, 2013) ABSTRACT Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) is a possible solution for the missing mass problem in galac- tic dynamics; its predictions are in good agreement with observations in the limit of weak accelerations. However, MOND does not derive from a physical mechanism and does not make predictions on the transitional regime from Newtonian to modified dynamics; rather, empirical transition functions have to be constructed from the boundary conditions and comparisons with observations. I compare the formalism of classical MOND to the scaling law derived from a toy model of gravity based on virtual massive gravitons (the “graviton picture”) which I proposed recently. I conclude that MOND naturally derives from the “graviton picture” at least for the case of non-relativistic, highly symmetric dynamical systems. This suggests that – to first order – the “graviton picture” indeed provides a valid candidate for the physical mechanism behind MOND and gravity on galactic scales in general. Key words : Gravitation — Galaxies: kinematics and dynamics −10 −2 1. INTRODUCTION where x = ac/am, am ≈ 10 ms is Milgrom’s con- stant, and µ(x)isa transition function with the asymp- “ It is worth remembering that all of the discus- totic behavior µ(x) → 1 for x ≫ 1 and µ(x) → x for sion [on dark matter] so far has been based on x ≪ 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Scientific Terms in the Mystery of Matter
    GLOSSARY OF SCIENTIFIC TERMS IN THE MYSTERY OF MATTER Term Definition Section acid A substance that has a pH of less than 7 and that can react with 1 metals and other substances. air The mixture of oxygen, nitrogen, and other gasses that is consistently 1 present around us. alchemist A person who practices a form of chemistry from the Middle Ages 1 that was concerned with transforming various metals into gold. Alchemy A type of science and philosophy from the Middle Ages that 1 attempted to perform unusual experiments, taking something ordinary and turning it into something extraordinary. alkali metals Any of a group of soft metallic elements that form alkali solutions 3 when they combine with water. They include lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, cesium, and francium. alkaline earth Any of a group of metallic elements that includes beryllium, 3 metals magnesium, calcium, strontium, barium, and radium. alpha particle A positively charged particle, indistinguishable from a helium atom 5, 6 nucleus and consisting of two protons and two neutrons. alpha decay A type of radioactive decay in which a nucleus emits 6 an alpha particle. aplastic anemia A disorder of the bone marrow that results in too few blood cells. 4 apothecary The person in a pharmacy who distributes medicine. 1 atom The smallest component of an element that shares the chemical 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 properties of the element and contains a nucleus with neutrons, protons, and electrons. atomic bomb A bomb whose explosive force comes from a chain reaction based on 6 nuclear fission. atomic number The number of protons in the nucleus of an atom.
    [Show full text]
  • Modified Newtonian Dynamics
    J. Astrophys. Astr. (December 2017) 38:59 © Indian Academy of Sciences https://doi.org/10.1007/s12036-017-9479-0 Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) as a Modification of Newtonian Inertia MOHAMMED ALZAIN Department of Physics, Omdurman Islamic University, Omdurman, Sudan. E-mail: [email protected] MS received 2 February 2017; accepted 14 July 2017; published online 31 October 2017 Abstract. We present a modified inertia formulation of Modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) without retaining Galilean invariance. Assuming that the existence of a universal upper bound, predicted by MOND, to the acceleration produced by a dark halo is equivalent to a violation of the hypothesis of locality (which states that an accelerated observer is pointwise inertial), we demonstrate that Milgrom’s law is invariant under a new space–time coordinate transformation. In light of the new coordinate symmetry, we address the deficiency of MOND in resolving the mass discrepancy problem in clusters of galaxies. Keywords. Dark matter—modified dynamics—Lorentz invariance 1. Introduction the upper bound is inferred by writing the excess (halo) acceleration as a function of the MOND acceleration, The modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) paradigm g (g) = g − g = g − gμ(g/a ). (2) posits that the observations attributed to the presence D N 0 of dark matter can be explained and empirically uni- It seems from the behavior of the interpolating function fied as a modification of Newtonian dynamics when the as dictated by Milgrom’s formula (Brada & Milgrom gravitational acceleration falls below a constant value 1999) that the acceleration equation (2) is universally −10 −2 of a0 10 ms .
    [Show full text]
  • The Standard Model and Beyond Maxim Perelstein, LEPP/Cornell U
    The Standard Model and Beyond Maxim Perelstein, LEPP/Cornell U. NYSS APS/AAPT Conference, April 19, 2008 The basic question of particle physics: What is the world made of? What is the smallest indivisible building block of matter? Is there such a thing? In the 20th century, we made tremendous progress in observing smaller and smaller objects Today’s accelerators allow us to study matter on length scales as short as 10^(-18) m The world’s largest particle accelerator/collider: the Tevatron (located at Fermilab in suburban Chicago) 4 miles long, accelerates protons and antiprotons to 99.9999% of speed of light and collides them head-on, 2 The CDF million collisions/sec. detector The control room Particle Collider is a Giant Microscope! • Optics: diffraction limit, ∆min ≈ λ • Quantum mechanics: particles waves, λ ≈ h¯/p • Higher energies shorter distances: ∆ ∼ 10−13 cm M c2 ∼ 1 GeV • Nucleus: proton mass p • Colliders today: E ∼ 100 GeV ∆ ∼ 10−16 cm • Colliders in near future: E ∼ 1000 GeV ∼ 1 TeV ∆ ∼ 10−17 cm Particle Colliders Can Create New Particles! • All naturally occuring matter consists of particles of just a few types: protons, neutrons, electrons, photons, neutrinos • Most other known particles are highly unstable (lifetimes << 1 sec) do not occur naturally In Special Relativity, energy and momentum are conserved, • 2 but mass is not: energy-mass transfer is possible! E = mc • So, a collision of 2 protons moving relativistically can result in production of particles that are much heavier than the protons, “made out of” their kinetic
    [Show full text]