DOCSLIB.ORG

2009 Annual Report Document De Référence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2009 Annual Report Document De Référence Vienna 2009 Annual Report Document de Référence TABLE OF CONTENTS COMPANY OVERVIEW 3 Financial highlights 4 The year 2009 6 The outdoor advertising industry 8 One business, three segments 16 Our advertisers 33 Sustainable development 38 Research and development 54 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 58 Management discussion and analysis of group consolidated financial statements 59 Consolidated financial statements and notes 69 Management discussion and analysis of corporate financial statements 128 Corporate financial statements and notes 130 LEGAL INFORMATION 152 Corporate governance, internal control and risk management 153 Shareholders and trading information 179 Share capital 186 Other legal information 189 COMBINED ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS, 19 MAY 2010 205 Agenda 206 Summary of proposed resolutions 207 Proposed resolutions 208 OTHER INFORMATION 211 Statutory auditors’ reports 212 Person responsible for the Annual Report and Persons responsible for the audit of the financial statements 217 Incorporation by reference In accordance with Article 28 of EU Regulation n°809/2004 dated 29 April 2004, the reader is referred to previous “Documents de référence” containing certain information: 1. Relating to fiscal year 2008: - The Management Discussion and Analysis and consolidated financial statements, including the statutory auditors’ report, set forth in the “Document de référence” filed on 10 April 2009 under number D.09-0229 (pages 51 to 117and 213, respectively). - The corporate financial statements of JCDecaux SA, their analysis, including the statutory auditors’ report, set forth in the “Document de référence” filed on 10 April 2009 under number D.09-0229 (pages 118 to 141 and 214, respectively). - The statutory auditors’ special report on regulated agreements with certain related parties, set forth in the “Document de référence” filed on 10 April 2009 under number D.09-0229 (page 216). 2. Relating to fiscal year 2007: - The Management Discussion and Analysis and consolidated financial statements, including the statutory auditors’ report, set forth in the “Document de référence” filed on 7 April 2008 under number D.08-207 (pages 49 to 112 and 194, respectively). - The corporate financial statements of JCDecaux SA, their analysis, including the statutory auditors’ report, set forth in the “Document de référence” filed on 7 April 2008 under number D.08-207 (pages 113 to 135 and 195, respectively). - The statutory auditors’ special report on regulated agreements with certain related parties, set forth in the “Document de référence” filed on 7 April 2008 under number D.08-207 (page 196). 1 2 COMPANY OVERVIEW Financial highlights 4 The year 2010 6 Our contracts 6 Partnerships, acquisitions and reorganisations 7 The outdoor advertising industry 8 Segments of the outdoor advertising industry 8 Outdoor advertising: an increasingly relevant communication channel 8 Competitive environment 14 One business, three segments 16 Our strategy 16 Street Furniture 17 Transport 23 Billboard 29 Our advertisers 33 Key advertisers 33 Characteristics of advertising contracts 36 JCDecaux OneWorld: serving our international advertisers 37 Sustainable development 38 Human resources 39 Relations with customers and suppliers 46 Relations with the community 48 Protecting the environmental policy 49 Carbon policy 52 Research and development 54 3 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 2009 REVENUES BY REGION (1) (1) Excluding France and the United Kingdom REVENUES BY BUSINESS OPERATING MARGIN BY BUSINESS (in € million, segment’s share in %) (in € million, segment’s share in %) In 2009, the Group’s revenue decreased by 11.5% to Operating margin(1) decreased by 28.7% to €392.0 million from €1,918.8 million. Excluding acquisitions and the impact of foreign €549.9 million in 2008. Operating margin as a percentage of exchange, organic revenue decline was 10.9%. Street Furniture consolidated revenue was 20.4%, down 500 basis points compared revenues were €934.3 million, a decline of 12.1%. Excluding to the prior period (2008: 25.4%), reflecting strong operating acquisitions and the impact of foreign exchange, organic revenue leverage partly offset by the cost saving measures successfully growth was (10.1)%. Transport revenues decreased by 6.3% to implemented in 2009. €589.6 million. Excluding acquisitions and the impact of foreign (1) Operating margin: Revenue less Direct operating expenses (excluding Maintenance exchange, organic revenue growth was (8.3)%. Billboard revenues spare parts) less SG&A expenses. decreased to 17.1% to €394.9 million. Excluding acquisitions and the impact of foreign exchange, organic revenue growth was (16.1)%. 4 EBIT BY BUSINESS NET INCOME GROUP SHARE (in € million, segment’s share in %) (in € million) EBIT(1) decreased by 48.1% to €122.8 million, down from €236.4 million in Net income Group share decreased by 77.3% to €24.5 million, compared to 2008. The Group’s EBIT margin was 6.4% of consolidated revenues, down €108.1 million in 2008. This decrease reflects the lower operating margin, the 450 basis points compared to 2008. (10.9%) increase in the effective tax rate and the strong decline in the performance of equity affiliates only somewhat offset by the improved net financial income. (1)EBIT: Earnings Before Interests and Taxes = Operating Margin less Depreciation, amortization and provisions, less Maintenance spare parts, less impairment charges, less other operating income and expenses. FREE CASH FLOW FINANCIAL NET DEBT / (in € million) EQUITY RATIO Free cash flow(1) increased by €16.8 million and amounted to €164.8 million, as a consequence of the strong reduction of capital expenditure and the further optimization of the Group’s working capital requirements Net debt as of 31 December 2009 was €670.0 million. The Group is rated “Baa2” by Moody’s and “BBB” by Standard and Poor’s. (1) Free Cash Flow: Net cash flow from operating activities less net capital investments (tangible and intangible assets). 2009 EMPLOYEE BREAKDOWN BY EXPERTISE EMPLOYEE BREAKDOWN BY REGION (1) (1) Excluding France and the United Kingdom FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS > 5 THE YEAR 2009 In 2009, we continued our strategy of selective organic and external growth and reinforced our position as the world leader in Street Furniture and airport advertising. 2009 saw a very difficult economic and financial environment leading to fewer tenders particularly in France. Nonetheless JCDecaux won important new and renewed contracts, both in mature markets, such as the renewal of the Marseilles Street Furniture contract, and in new markets, such as the win of the Kyoto street furniture contract, which enables JCDecaux to reinforce its presence in Japan. We also stepped up our self-service bicycle business, launching several new schemes in, among other places, Dublin in Ireland and Brussels in Belgium, where the existing scheme has been extended. The Group also exported the concept of self-service bicycle outside of Europe with the win of two contracts in Brisbane, Australia and Toyama, Japan. Both contracts will be operated in the course of 2010. JCDecaux maintained its position in the main French airports with the renewals of Nice, Toulouse and Biarritz. Finally, in 2009 JCDecaux acquired a complementary 49.18% share of the capital of the German company Wall, increasing its holding in the second largest outdoor advertising company to 89.18%. This transaction will strengthen JCDecaux’s commercial offer in the largest European market which is also one of the historical markets of the Group. 1. OUR CONTRACTS Europe In France, we won the following public tenders: The street furniture contract for the Urban Community of Marseille (CUM) Provence Métropole (population: 980,000). The award follows a competitive tender and will be for a 13-year period. The advertising street ® furniture contract covers the installation, maintenance and upkeep of 922 bus shelters, 432 MUPI free-standing ® information panels and 96 large-format (8 m²) Senior advertising panels in Marseille in addition to 124 bus shelters for 8 of the 18 municipalities belonging to the CUM urban community. The contract represents a total of 3,070 advertising panels; The contract for indoor and outdoor advertising operations at Toulouse Blagnac Airport. This 7-year contract will begin on April 1 2009 and follows a consultation process by Toulouse Blagnac Airport. With more than 6 million passengers every year, Toulouse Blagnac is France’s fourth largest airport. JCDecaux Airport, already responsible for managing indoor advertising at Toulouse Blagnac, focused its bid on innovation – with the creation of walls of video screens, the use of exceptional billboard displays, a range of sponsored services for passengers, hotel information terminals – as well as on the development of experiential advertising. JCDecaux Airport’s well-designed and innovative advertising sites will enhance the environment of Toulouse Blagnac Airport’s new terminal (Hall D); Ten street furniture contracts in the Ile-de-France region through a process of competitive tenders over the past few months. The towns cities have a combined population of more than 316,000 inhabitants. These contracts cover a total of 883 2m² advertising panels and 182 8m² advertising panels. JCDecaux has been chosen by the following cities: Bois d'Arcy, Champigny sur Marne, Choisy le Roi, Dammarie Les Lys, Louveciennes, Maisons Alfort, Montigny le Bretonneux, Rosny sous Bois, Saint Gratien and Velizy Villacoublay. Nine advertising street furniture contracts in the French provinces over the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Le Développement Durable
    Couv Rapport GB_2010 18/05/11 16:20 Page1 2010 Annual report 2010 Annual report Document de Référence Shanghai TABLE OF CONTENTS COMPANY OVERVIEW 3 Financial highlights 4 The year 2010 6 The outdoor advertising industry 9 One business, three segments 18 Our advertisers 37 Sustainable development 39 Research and development 52 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 54 Management discussion and analysis of group consolidated financial statements 55 Consolidated financial statements and notes 65 Management discussion and analysis of corporate financial statements 123 Corporate financial statements and notes 125 LEGAL INFORMATION 146 Corporate governance, internal control and risk management 147 Shareholders and trading information 174 Share capital 181 Other legal information 184 COMBINED ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS, 11 MAY 2011 201 Agenda 202 Summary of proposed resolutions 203 Proposed resolutions 205 OTHER INFORMATION 221 Statutory auditors’ reports 222 Person responsible for the Annual Report and Persons responsible for the audit of the financial statements 230 Incorporation by reference In accordance with Article 28 of EU Regulation n°809/2004 dated 29 April 2004, the reader is referred to previous “Documents de référence” containing certain information: 1. Relating to fiscal year 2009: - The Management Discussion and Analysis and consolidated financial statements, including the statutory auditors’ report, set forth in the “Document de référence” filed on 16 April 2010 under number D 10-0283 (pages 57 to 124 and 224 to 225, respectively). - The corporate financial statements of JCDecaux SA, their analysis, including the statutory auditors’ report, set forth in the “Document de référence” filed on 16 April 2010 under number D. 10-0283 (pages 125 to 145 and 226 to 227, respectively).
    [Show full text]
  • Bike Sharing 5.0 Market Insights and Outlook
    Bike Sharing 5.0 Market insights and outlook Berlin, August 2018 This study provides a comprehensive overview of developments on the bike sharing market Management summary 1 Key trends in > Major innovations and new regulations are on the way to reshaping the mobility market innovative mobility > New business models follow an asset-light approach allowing consumers to share mobility offerings > Bike sharing has emerged as one of the most-trending forms of mobility in the current era > Digitalization has enabled bike sharing to become a fully integrated part of urban mobility 2 Bike sharing market > Bike sharing has grown at an extremely fast rate and is now available in over 70 countries development > Several mostly Asian operators have been expanding fast, but first business failures can be seen > On the downside, authorities are alarmed by the excessive growth and severe acts of vandalism > Overall, the bike sharing market is expected to grow continuously by 20% in the years ahead 3 Role of bike sharing > Bike sharing has established itself as a low-priced and convenient alternative in many cities in urban mobility > The three basic operating models are dock-based, hybrid and free-floating > Key success factors for bike sharing are a high-density network and high-quality bikes > Integrated mobility platforms enable bike sharing to become an essential part of intermodal mobility 4 Future of bike > Bike sharing operators will have to proactively shape the mobility market to stay competitive sharing > Intense intra-city competition will
    [Show full text]
  • Cardiff City Bike Share a Study in Success
    Narrative, network and nextbike Cardiff City Bike Share A study in success Beate Kubitz December 2018 About the author Beate Kubitz is an independent researcher and writer on innovative mobility. She is the author of the Annual Survey of Mobility as a Service (2017 and 2018) published by Landor LINKS, as well as numerous articles about changing transport provision, technology and innovation including bike share, car sharing, demand responsive transport, mobile ticketing and payments and open data. Her background is in shared transport – working on the Public Bike Share Users Survey and the Annual Survey of Car Clubs (CoMoUK). She has contributed to TravelSpirit Foundation publications on autonomy and open models of Mobility as a Service and open data and transport published by the Open Data Institute. About the report This report is based on interviews with Cardiff cyclists carried out online and a field trip to Cardiff in August 2018 including interviews with: • Cardiff City Council Transport and Planning Officer • Cardiff University Facilities Manager • Pedal Power Development Manager • Group discussion with Cardiff Cycle City group Membership and usage data for Cardiff, Glasgow and Milton Keynes bike share schemes was provided by nextbike. In addition, it draws on the Propensity to Cycle Tool, the 2017 Public Bike Share User Survey (Bikeplus, now Como UK), Sustrans reporting, local government data and media and social media scanning. Photographs of Cardiff nextbike docking stations and bikes were taken by the author in August 2018. The report was commissioned and funded by nextbike UK in order to understand how different elements affect the use and success of a bike share scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Mobility Response to COVID-19 How Cities Are Responding, Recovering, and Reopening Transportation Systems Around the World
    Global Mobility Response to COVID-19 How cities are responding, recovering, and reopening transportation systems around the world June 2020 | Version 1.0 Global Mobility Response to COVID-19 Contents About Sam Schwartz Sam Schwartz is a full-service engineering, Introduction ................................................................................................. pg. 3 design, and consulting firm with nearly 25 years of experience helping cities respond to unexpected challenges. From the beginning, our firm has focused 1. Research Framework ............................................................................ pg. 4 on two things: solving the most novel, complicated problems—and putting people first. 2. Overview - Global Mobility Response to COVID-19 ...................... pg. 6 In the wake of 9/11, Superstorm Sandy, and other disasters, we were trusted by public and private i. Immediate Response in a New Transportation Landscape .........pg. 7 clients to address unprecedented challenges. During these crises, we went to work immediately to ensure efficient and safe movement of people and goods. ii. Trends by Transportation Category .........................................................pg. 7 Similarly, in this moment, we are committed to doing everything we can to keep our first responders moving, our institutions operational, and our 3. Recovery-Based Strategies - Worldwide Case Studies ................. pg. 8 communities safe. i. Rethinking the Right of Way .......................................................................pg.
    [Show full text]
  • Pourquoi Smoove a Remporté Les Vélos En Libre-Service D'helsinki
    En 2014 Smoove avait remporté le marché de Moscou D.R. Pourquoi Smoove a remporté les vélos en libre-service d'Helsinki La PME hexagonale poursuit son développement à l’international. Après Moscou en 2014, elle vient de remporter l’appel d’offres pour équiper la capitale de la Finlande de 1500 vélos en libre- service. Et elle prévoit de se positionner face à JCDecaux pour le renouvellement des marchés du Vélib’et du Vélov’. Après un an de discussions, c’est la PME montpelliéraine Smoove qui a décroché le contrat pour le déploiement du système de vélos en libre-service d’Helsinki. Un contrat remporté avec deux partenaires : le groupe catalan de transport et d’automobile Moventia, ainsi que l’américain Clear Channel, spécialiste de la publicité urbaine. "Nous avons principalement décroché ce contrat car nous étions les mieux positionnés en termes de prix", confie Laurent Mercat, président de Smoove. "Notre système est basé sur des stations d’accueil très légères ce qui réduit le coût d’infrastructure". Smoove a en effet développé un "système inversé" par rapport aux solutions telles que Vélib’où toutes les communications s’effectuent au niveau des stations. Dans le cas de Smoove, c’est le vélo qui intègre un boîtier de communication électronique, baptisé "Smoove Box", qui communique avec le serveur central du service par radios. Pour déverrouiller le vélo, il suffit ainsi de passer une carte sans contacts à proximité de ce boîtier. Une formule qui a séduit Helsinki qui prévoit le déploiement de 50 stations et 500 vélos en 2016. Dès le printemps 2017, le système sera étendu à 1500 vélos et 150 stations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pebss Week
    [email protected] sas asddcsdfADFEDFEaefafqaefqaefqqefqfqwfqffqdasdcsdfawef awd fawe fwefwefwe +32 2 880 92 74 THE PEBSS WEEK Inaugural Conference of the Platform for European Bicycle Sharing & Systems Hotel Haarhuis, Stationsplein 1, Arnhem – Monday 12 June 2017, 13:00 through 18:00 Time Topic / Subject / Event 13:00–13:10 Conference Opening & Welcome 13:10–13:30 Opening Keynote: Matthew Clark, Steer Davies Gleave A Diverse World: Ralf Kalupner @ nextbike; Lee Jones @ BCycle; Damien Vander Heyden @ Smoove; Johan Hogasen-Hallesby @ Urban Infrstructure; Tomas Martins @ 13:30–14:00 TemBici Moderator: Paul Stratta Integrating ALL species of shared bicycle mobility into one eco-system: traditional PBS, train station-based AA bike share, campus fleets, corporate fleets, and un-anchored ECF free-floating systems. Commercial strategies to ensure that the entire eco-system becomes self-reinforcing. Electric Bike Share: Philip Douglas @ Motivate: Talia Winokur @ SoftWheel; 14:00–14:30 Antonia Roberts @ Bikeplus; Paola Bellocchio @ Bicincitta; Alain Ayotte @ Bewegen Moderator: Industry accelerator for shared bicycle mobility; Lessons learned so far, commercial Russell Meddin implications for future development, “big sky thinking”. Integration with 5th Generation Bike Share Map PBS and general urban mobility. 14:30–14:45 Coffee break Maas, Big Data & Apps: Tom Nutley @ Stage Intelligence; Irene MacAleese @ 14:45–15:15 See.Sense; Marie Quinquis @ Qucit; David Lewis @ ITO World; Erdem Ovacik @ Moderator: Donkey Republic Raymond Gense For and across Bikeshare;
    [Show full text]
  • Business Report FY 2020
    Business report FY 2020 March 15th, 2021 Contents Annual business review – FY 2020 ......................................................................................... 3 Annual financial release – FY 2020 ............................................................................................. 3 Business highlights of FY 2020 ................................................................................................. 11 Perspectives .............................................................................................................................. 13 Related parties .......................................................................................................................... 14 Risk factors ............................................................................................................................... 15 Annual consolidated financial statements – FY 2020 ....................................................... 18 Annual consolidated financial statements .................................................................................. 18 Notes to the annual consolidated financial statements .............................................................. 24 Statutory Auditors’ report ...................................................................................................... 88 2 Annual business review – FY 2020 Annual financial release – FY 2020 ANNUAL BUSINESS REVIEW – FY 2020 ANNUAL FINANCIAL RELEASE – FY 2020 • Adjusted revenue down -40.6% to €2,311.8 million • Adjusted organic
    [Show full text]
  • Public Bicycle Schemes
    Division 44 Water, Energy and Transport Recommended Reading and Links on Public Bicycle Schemes September 2010 Reading List on Public Bicycle Schemes Preface Various cities around the world are trying methods to encourage bicycling as a sustainable transport mode. Among those methods in encouraging cycling implementing public bicycle schemes is one. The public bicycle schemes are also known as bicycle sharing systems, community bicycling schemes etc., The main idea of a public bicycle system is that the user need not own a bicycle but still gain the advantages of bicycling by renting a bicycle provided by the scheme for a nominal fee or for free of charge (as in some cities). Most of these schemes enable people to realize one way trips, because the users needn’t to return the bicycles to the origin, which will avoid unnecessary travel. Public bicycle schemes provide not only convenience for trips in the communities, they can also be a good addition to the public transport system. Encouraging public bike systems have shown that there can be numerous short that could be made by a bicycle instead of using motorised modes. Public bike schemes also encourage creative designs in bikes and also in the operational mechanisms. The current document is one of the several efforts of GTZ-Sustainable Urban Transport Project to bring to the policymakers an easy to access list of available material on Public Bike Schemes (PBS) which can be used in their everyday work. The document aims to list out some influential and informative resources that highlight the importance of PBS in cities and how the existing situation could be improved.
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneer Valley Regional Bike Share System Pilot
    Pioneer Valley Regional Bike Share System Pilot Pioneer Valley Regional Bike Share System Pilot April 2016 Alta Planning + Design | Page 0 Pioneer Valley Regional Bike Share System Pilot Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 2. Business Models ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Business Model Matrix ................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Proposed Business Model............................................................................................................................................. 7 3. System Costs and Revenues .................................................................................................................................................. 9 3.1 Cost Components ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • City Bike Hire Schemes
    1 1 City Bike Hire Schemes - Emerging Trends in Europe 2 3 4 Stephen Parkes 5 6 Institute for Transport Studies 7 University of Leeds 8 Leeds 9 LS2 9JT 10 United Kingdom 11 Tel: +44 (0)113 343 1787 12 [email protected] 13 14 15 Dr Greg Marsden* 16 17 Institute for Transport Studies 18 University of Leeds 19 Leeds 20 LS2 9JT 21 United Kingdom 22 Tel: +44 (0)113 343 5325 23 Fax: +44 (0)113 343 5334 24 [email protected] 25 26 * corresponding author 27 28 Word Count: 5989 + 6 Figures = 7489 29 30 Submission Date: 14/11/2011 TRB 2012 Annual Meeting Paper revised from original submittal. 2 31 City Bike Hire Schemes - Emerging Trends in Europe 32 33 34 Abstract 35 36 This paper examines the recent increase in the uptake of city bike hire (also known as “bike 37 share”) schemes and provides an analysis of the emerging trends that are being witnessed. 38 The paper is based on an ongoing study into the spread and distribution in the adoption of 39 bike hire schemes throughout Europe. The data collection consists of two stages that first 40 seek to build a picture of the current situation before moving on to a more detailed discussion 41 with the scheme adopters. 42 The paper presents a brief history of bike hire schemes and describes the theoretical basis 43 for the investigation, drawing on innovation and diffusion theory. It then reports the findings 44 of the research, which suggests that the expansion phase of city adoption of public bike hire 45 schemes may be past its peak.
    [Show full text]
  • AWARE in Openlca
    openLCA (1.7.4) Case study: Bike sharing openLCA Version: 1.7.4 Document version: 1.0 Date: 09. November 2018 Authors: Francesca Recanati, Andreas Ciroth GreenDelta GmbH Tel +49 30 48496030 Kaiserdamm 13 Fax +49 30 4849 6991 14057 Berlin GERMANY Bike sharing Outline 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Goal and scope definition ................................................................................................................ 2 3 Inventory analysis – baseline and alternatives .......................................................................... 3 3.1 Bike production .................................................................................................................................. 3 3.2 Bike use phase and maintenance ................................................................................................. 4 3.3 Baseline and alternatives cases ...................................................................................................... 5 3.4 Urban (public) transportation means – comparison ................................................................. 7 4 Summary of modelling approach and cases under study ....................................................... 7 5 Life Cycle Impact Assessment method ........................................................................................ 8 6 Results .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Uanotat 134 2019 Sykkeldelingsordninger
    Ingunn Opheim Ellis Notat Maria Amundsen 134/2019 Sykkeldelingsordninger Sykkeldelingsordninger Forord På oppdrag fra Kolumbus har Urbanet Analyse gjort en kartlegging av ulike sykkeldelingsordninger verden over. Oppdraget gikk utgangspunktet ut på å gjennomføre en analyse av suksesskriterier for en sykkeldelingsordning, basert på en kvantitativ analyse av ulike egenskaper ved et større antall ulike sykkeldelingsordninger. Den innledende kartleggingen av ulike sykkeldelingsordninger avdekket at det er lite tilgjengelig informasjon om svært mange av sykkeldelingsordningene som finnes, da dette i stor grad anses som forretningssensitiv informasjon. Den kvantitative analysen har derfor ikke kunnet gjennomføres. I dette notatet oppsummeres den kunnskapen om ulike sykkeldelingsordninger vi har fått gjennom arbeidet med prosjektet. Kontaktperson hos oppdragsgiver har vært Rolf Michael Odland. Fra Urbanet Analyse har Ingunn Opheim Ellis vært prosjektleder, med Maria Amundsen og Karoline Nielsen (Asplan Viak) som prosjektmedarbeidere. Katrine N. Kjørstad har kvalitetssikret oppdraget. Oslo, februar 2019 Bård Norheim Urbanet Analyse notat 134/2019 Innhold Hovedfunn ........................................................................................................................... i Vanskelig å finne gode data om bruk av sykkeldelingsordninger ......................................................... i Noen få kommersielle aktører har ansvar for mange sykkeldelingsordninger ..................................... i De største sykkeldelingsordningene
    [Show full text]