French Sociologists and the Public Space of the Press: Thoughts Based on a Case Study (Le Monde, 1995-2002)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

French Sociologists and the Public Space of the Press: Thoughts Based on a Case Study (Le Monde, 1995-2002) See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282608008 French Sociologists and the Public Space of the Press: Thoughts based on a Case Study (Le Monde, 1995-2002) Chapter · January 2009 CITATIONS READS 0 41 1 author: Sebastien Mosbah-Natanson Université du Québec à Montréal 26 PUBLICATIONS 85 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Sebastien Mosbah-Natanson on 10 January 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Intellectuals and their Publics Chapter 10 Perspectives from the Social Sciences French Sociologists and the Public Space of the Press: Thoughts Based on a Case Study (Le Monde, 19951002) Laurent Jeanpierre and Sébastien Mosbah-Natanson Intrsduction Recent studies in comparative history tend to support the hypothesis of a Edited by speciûcally French national mode of engagement of the intellectual professions cHRIsTIAN n'rpck and oftheir place in the social sbucture (see Charle, 1996). lt is in France, as is University of Graz, Austria well known, that, at the time of the Dreyfus Affair at ths end of the nineteenth century, the neologism 'intellectual' was coined and that a heterogeneous social ANDREAS HESS gloup, made up of thinkers and writers, used it to oppose the traditional elites, in University College Dublin, IrelaJtd particular those in possession of economic power (see Charle, 1990, 163-82). For a long time, being an intellectual in France was based on the fact of E. STINA LYON speaking out in public in the name of universal values, using a legitimacy acquired in a specific London South Bank University, UK professional field of the intellectual world, as in the case of Zolaupon his famous publication of 'J'accuse' (1898). Other forms of intervention by professional intellectuals have undoubtedly been developed over the last century. But this initial model ofengagementhas been maintained in contemporary national public life. In this chapter we ask how it is socially structured and organized today. This chapter deals more particularly with the public engagement of sociologists in France. It considers one aspect of this issue: stances taken in newspaper op-ed columns. We focus on the op-ed columns ofonly one large daily newspaper,Ie Monde, between 1995 and 2002.t In the French political and public context, the year 1995 witnessed the intense engagement ofcertain intellecfuals with social movements ofthe time, a mobilization that has already been the subject of sociological analysis (see Duval et al., i998; Legavre, 1999). Therefore, it appeared that this year and the studies formerly canied out could serve as a ûrst point of oomparison *hich would be of relevance for our own results, seeking to treat a longer time span. On the basis of this case study, we shall firstly situate the commentary of sociologists in relation to that of the other intellectual professions. Then, the main factors determining the behaviour of French sociologists in Le Monde over recent years will be analysed. Finally, we aim to identiS the traits - in ASHGATE I For a comparison between the French and the ltalian case, see Lettieri (2002). t4 Intellectuals and their Publics French Sociologists and the Public Space ofthe Press 175 particular - the themes - that may characte rize the modes of intervention of French The first selection was made on the basis of 'selÈpresentations', in the Goffinanian sociologists in the national daily press. sense, chosenbythe authorsthemselves(seeGoffman, 1959 [ 956]).Itis noJunusual to observe intellectuals changing self-presentation on the basis of circumstance or the 'cause'being defended.s In all ofthe professional fields selected, professors Methodology and the holders of various teaching positions at secondary or tertiary levels, as well as students, were added from the outset wherever their disciplinary affiliation In order to evaluate the position and role of sociologists in the contemporary was indicated. In order to limit the omission of professionals in the social and French public sphere, we decided to carry out an analysis of the interventions in human sciences, we also specifically added people with an affiliation tothe Centre debates in the daily newspaperze Monde. using the newspaper's cD-RoMs, we national de la recherche scienlifique (CNRS) or the École des hautes ëtudes en .Horizons-Débats' constructed a database containing the opinions published in the sciences sociales (EHESS) and explicitly coming from disciplines in the social pages between 1995 and 2002. For the most part, these pages publish columns, sciences which appear in the public organigrams of these institutions or of their similar to the 'op-ed'pages ofAnglo-American newspapers.2 Thàre is no freedom research centres.e This means that while self-presentation remained the criterion of access to the column, which is in fact managed by one editorial journalist for the professional categorization ofposition that prevailed, it was also crossed, who selects columns on the basis of proposals received. she or he is actually the during the primary phase of the study, with another criterion: affiliation to teaching gatekeeper or even the producer ofthe op-ed section. personalities gain the right and research in social science institutions. to write in it, and through this, attain the status of public intellectual. The words In order to avoid any suspicion of professional ethnocentrism or bias, we published in the opinion pages must, furthermore, be individually or collectively applied this last criterion most rigorously to sociologists themselves. The number signed, or taken responsibility for in the name of a group. In the newspaper studied, of interventions they made was therefore slightly underestimated. During the individual bylines must also be followed by a title or post. This signàture takes on study's second phase, we excluded from the final breakdown those who presented the role of a veritable 'discourse on discourse', and allows for the representation themselves as sociologists or as holding a title or an equivalent position but having made by the intellectuals of their position in the social space, and on this occasion never appeared in a scientific journal ofthe discipline in recent decades.r0 Taking the public sphere, to be situated.3 into account the proximity in France between sociology and political science, the The articles which appeared in the opinion pages of Le Monde can be broken same restrictive criterion had also to be applied to political scientists. In several down and analysed in terms of the following intellectual professions: economists,a cases, it was difficult to determine if people belonged to one discipline or the writers, historians,5 philosophers, political scientists, psychologists,6 sociologists.T other, as instances of cross- and dual affiliations were rather frequent. In the same way, columnists who declared themselves teachers of 'political sociology' were classified in both disciplines, and consequently counted twice. 2 These commentaries, solicited or selected by the newspaper, were also supplemented In addition to the margins of error regarding the breakdown of intellectual by some less frequent pages of interviews under the same general op-ed formai and called professions contributing to op-ed sections, a further limitation of our study, related Horizons-Entretiens ('intewiews'). They also reflect the representation that the newspaper constructs of people with the most legitimacy to have their words published. 3 On the social role ofthe signature, see Fraenkel (1992). 8 Therefore, in the relatively numerous cases of dual self-deflnitions ('philosopher 4 We have excluded signatories of texts with the title 'lecturer in economic sciences' and writer', 'sociologist and historian'), we decided to classiff the author under all the and probably underestimated the number of economists who do not work in higher education fields she or he claimed to represent. We therefore from the outset prevented ourselves from or scientiûc institutions, but rather for banks or insurance companies. We have also excluded judging the legitimacy of the self-deûnitions given. As a result, multiple self-definitions do business; management or flnance professionals. Intellectuals with multiple affiliations (a not ûgure more heavily in any field in particular. Professor of Economics and Business, for instance) were included with the economists. 9 Other institutions were added in the case of political scientists - the Fondation 5 Historians of art and of science were éxcluded from the study. In the French nationale des sciences politiques (FNSP), the Ceri tre d'études etderecherches internalionales university system, their training and recruitment follow different patterns from those of (CERI) and the Centre d'étude de la vie politique française (CEVIPOF). To be sure, our historians. breakdowns tend to underestimate specialists ofcultural regions. It appeared to us that their 6 In addition to psychologists and teachers ofpsychology, we included psychoanalysts disciplinary skills, as sociologists, political scientists, geographers, historians, economists and psychotherapists. We did not take psychiatrists into account, as their primary training in or anthropologists, were secondary to their knowledge of a specific territorial domain. medicine is further away from the human and social sciences that are the focus oiour study. 10 The appearance of signatories in disciplinary journals was evaluated onthe basis
Recommended publications
  • AHA 2010 Freedom of Expression and the Rights of Women
    www.theAHAfoundation.org FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND THE RIGHTS OF WOMEN Political Islam’s threat to freedom of expression is bad for everyone, but hurts women the most December 2, 2010 Published by the AHA Foundation The AHA Foundation 130 7th Avenue, Suite 236, New York, NY 10011 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary & Recommendations 3 Introduction: The Price of Freedom of Expression 6 Section 1: The Importance of Freedom of Expression for the Rights of 7 Muslim Women in Western Countries Section 2: Political Islam and Multiple Levels of Pressure against Freedom 10 of Expression 1) Global Political Pressure 12 2) Lawsuits and Legal Tactics Pressuring Individuals—the Fight in the 25 Courts 3) Pressure through Physical Threats to Individuals 31 4) Internal Pressures: U.S. Institutions, Fear, and Self-Censorship 39 Section 3: The Effects of a Climate of Domination 48 Conclusion: A More Effective Response in the United States and Other 52 Western Countries References 55 2 Executive Summary Supporters of political Islam have launched a multifaceted assault on the principles of freedom in the West. Political Islam includes the establishment of Sharia (the body of Islamic religious law), which contains harsh restrictions on freedom of expression, as well as harsh punishments for apostasy and blasphemy and standards at odds with modern Western norms of gender equality. Political Islamists are actively attempting to extend the reach of Sharia over Western cultures and legal systems. This report addresses how, through means of actual physical violence, threats and intimidation, legal action, and political pressure, the emancipation of Muslim women is stunted if not ground to a halt.
    [Show full text]
  • La Parité Paradoxale, De La Justice Sociale À L'instrumentalisation Des
    Malka Marcovich CONTROVER ES S 67 La parité paradoxale, de la justice sociale à l’instrumentalisation des droits des femmes Malka Marcovich Historienne, auteur de Les Nations dés-Unies, ou comment l’ONU enterre les Droits de l’Homme Liberté, universalité, parité (Edit. Jacob-Duvernet). Je fais partie des féministes qui ont défendu durant les années 1990 l’inscription de la parité dans la constitution. Il ne s’agissait en aucune manière d’une affirmation « communauta- riste » – car les femmes ne constituent nulle- ment une « communauté » ni davantage une « catégorie » 1 de la population – mais d’une revendication pour plus de justice et pour la mise en œuvre du contrat social d’égalité affirmé sur le fronton des mairies de la République. La France de la liberté, de l’Universel, « des droits de l’Homme » accusait un retard patent dans la représentation politique des femmes par rapport aux autres démocraties dans le monde. En 1981, malgré la création pour la pre- mière fois d’un Ministère aux droits des femmes confié à Yvette Roudy, on ne trouvait que 5 % de députées et 2 % de sénatrices. En 1993, lorsque débuta le mouvement pour plus de représentation politique des femmes, l’Assemblée n’avait gagné qu’un point par rapport aux chiffres calamiteux des années 802, affichant 6 % et le Sénat 5 %. Alors que l’on assistait à un formidable vent d’espoir démocratique en Europe avec l’effondrement des régimes communistes, que l’Afrique du Sud sortait 68 CONTROVER ES S Dossier d’une longue période de discrimination raciste, la France qui se présentait comme la voix inspirée des droits fondamentaux dans le monde, continuait d’exclure de sa représentation politique plus de la moitié de sa population.
    [Show full text]
  • Roger Garaudy, Abbé Pierre, and the French Negationists
    Simon Epstein Roger Garaudy, Abbé Pierre, and the French Negationists The Roger Garaudy affair, was the most famous of the cases of negationism in France in the 1990s. It boosted Garaudy to the rank of chief propagator of denial of the Shoah, following in the footsteps of Paul Rassinier, who made himself known in the 1950s, and Robert Faurisson, whose hour of glory came in the 1980s. In addition, the Garaudy affair marks the point of intersection between negationism and a particularly virulent anti-Zionism. For both of these reasons—its place in the history of negationism in France and its “anti-Zionist” specificity—this affair deserves to be examined in detail, in all its phases of development. Central to such an analysis is the somewhat unusual biography of the chief protagonist. Born in 1913 to a working-class family, Roger Garaudy was first tempted by Protestantism before becoming a Marxist in 1933. A teacher of philosophy at the secondary school in Albi, in the Tarn, he became an active militant in the ranks of the French Communist Party (PCF). He was arrested in September 1940 and trans- ferred to the detention camps of the Vichy regime in Southern Algeria. Elected to the French Parliament after the war, he progressed through the Communist hierarchy and became one of the intellectuals most representative of, and loyal to the PCF. Director of the Center of Marxist Studies and Research (CERM) from 1959 to 1969, he addressed himself to promoting dialogue between Marxists and Christians. He sought to prove that Communism was compatible with humanism, in compliance with the “politics of openness” advocated by Maurice Thorez, the Communist leader.
    [Show full text]
  • Consulter/Télécharger
    Sommaire | juin 2015 Éditorial 5 | Réformer l’islam › Valérie Toranian Événement 8 | Éric Zemmour. « J’aime la France de 1660 à 1815 » › Valérie Toranian et Marin de Viry 24 | Éric Zemmour est-il un intellectuel ? › Franz-Olivier Giesbert Dossier | L’islam face au Coran. La réforme est-elle possible ? 32 | Histoire de la réforme en islam › Malek Chebel 45 | La révolution de la raison › Ghaleb Bencheikh 53 | « Il faut se débarasser du wahhabisme » › Alaa El Aswany et Valérie Toranian 63 | La réforme religieuse n’est pas un long fleuve tranquille › Robert Redeker 70 | Plutôt que réformer l’islam, réformons l’école › Leïla Slimani 76 | L’islam et l’école › Jean-Paul Brighelli 85 | L’imamat en France : magistère religieux et formation › Bernard Godard 94 | Chair et charia › Shereen El Feki 99 | Pour aller plus loin › Aurélie Julia Études, reportages, réflexions 102 | Vers la paix au Moyen-Orient : l’accord nucléaire avec l’Iran › Renaud Girard 106 | Les lieux de l’historien › Philippe Raynaud 2 JUIN 2015 118 | Pourquoi calculer la valeur de la vie humaine ? › Annick Steta 126 | Journal › Richard Millet 130 | Choses entendues › Arthur Dreyfus Critiques 138 | Livres – Malraux derrière la caméra › Michel Ciment 142 | Livres – L’accouplement selon Jean-Didier Vincent › Laura Bossi Régnier 145 | Livres – Les enquêtes de Roger Chartier › Michel Delon 148 | Livres – Vers un abêtissement irrémédiable › Robert Kopp 151 | Livres – Morand entre Chardonne et Nimier › Stéphane Guégan 155 | Livres – Alain Gouttman, le désastre de Sedan › Robert Kopp 157
    [Show full text]
  • Tunisia Page 1 of 18
    Tunisia Page 1 of 18 Tunisia Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2006 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 6, 2007 Tunisia is a constitutionally based republic with a population of approximately 10 million, dominated by a single political party, the Democratic Constitutional Rally (RCD). Zine El-Abidine Ben Ali has been the president since 1987. In the 2004 presidential election, President Ben Ali ran against three opposition candidates and was declared the winner with approximately 94 percent of the popular vote. Official turnout was higher than 90 percent, although observers regarded these figures as substantially inflated. In concurrent parliamentary elections, the RCD gained 152 of the 189 seats. A second legislative body, the Chamber of Advisors, was created in a 2002 referendum amending the constitution. In July 2005 indirect elections for the Chamber of Advisors resulted in a heavily pro-RCD body. The civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces. The government continued to commit serious human rights abuses. There were significant limitations on citizens' right to change their government. Members of the security forces tortured and physically abused prisoners and detainees. Security forces arbitrarily arrested and detained individuals. Authorities did not charge any police or security force official with abuse during the year. Lengthy pretrial and incommunicado detention remained a serious problem. The government infringed on citizens' privacy rights, continued to impose severe restrictions on freedom of speech and of the press, and restricted freedom of assembly and association. The government remained intolerant of public criticism and used intimidation, criminal investigations, the court system, arbitrary arrests, residential restrictions, and travel controls (including denial of passports), to discourage criticism by human rights and opposition activists.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrorism Research Institute Denying the Link Between Islamist Ideology
    Terrorism Research Institute Denying the Link between Islamist Ideology and Jihadist Terrorism “Political Correctness” and the Undermining of Counterterrorism Author(s): Jeffrey M. Bale Source: Perspectives on Terrorism, Vol. 7, No. 5 (October 2013), pp. 5-46 Published by: Terrorism Research Institute Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/26297006 Accessed: 03-07-2018 14:08 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms This article is licensed under a Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0). To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/. Terrorism Research Institute is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Perspectives on Terrorism This content downloaded from 132.229.180.47 on Tue, 03 Jul 2018 14:08:49 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms PERSPECTIVES ON TERRORISM Volume 7, Issue 5 I. Articles Denying the Link between Islamist Ideology and Jihadist Terrorism: “Political Correctness” and the Undermining of Counterterrorism by Jeffrey M. Bale “[I]f your enemy is a terrorist and he professes to be an Islamist, it may be wise to take him at
    [Show full text]
  • The Redeker Affair Christian Delacampagne
    Retour € l'Accueil The Redeker Affair Christian Delacampagne his past September, Robert Redeker, a French Laden) Sheikh Youssef al-Qaradawi. In Egypt and T high-school philosophy teacher at Saint- Tunisia, the offending issue of Le Figaro was banned. Orens-de-Gameville (a small city near Toulouse) As for Redeker himself, he soon received a large and the author of several scholarly books, published number of threats by letter and e-mail. On an Is- an op-ed article in the newspaper Le Figaro. The lamist website, he was sentenced to death in a post- piece, a response to the controversy over remarks ing that, in order to facilitate a potential assassin’s about Islam made a week earlier by Pope Benedict task, also provided his address and a photograph of XVI, was titled “What Should the Free World Do his home. Fearful for himself and his family, Redek- in the Face of Islamist Intimidation?” It was a fierce er sought protection from the local police, who critique of what Redeker called Islam’s attempt “to transferred the case to the national counter-espi- place its leaden cloak over the world.” If Jesus was onage authorities. On their advice, Redeker, his wife, “a master of love,” he wrote, Muhammad was “a and three children fled their home and took shelter master of hatred.” Of the three “religions of the in a secret location. Since then, they have moved book,” Islam was the only one that overtly preached from city to city, at their own expense, under police holy war. “Whereas Judaism and Christianity are re- protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Défendre Robert Redeker
    MdM3bat 20/02/07 15:46 Page 128 128 HORS CADRE Jazira. Il a demandé aux musulmans du monde entier de protester « pacifi- quement » contre l’article de Robert Redeker. Ces protestations « pacifiques » se sont traduites aussitôt par de nombreuses Défendre menaces de mort qui, prises au sérieux par la DST, ont conduit le ministère de Robert Redeker l’Intérieur à instaurer un dispositif de sécurité permanent afin de le proté- ger. Un des auteurs présumés des MICHEL TAUBMANN menaces a été arrêté au Maroc en décembre. Mais Robert Redeker demeurera encore longtemps une cible Qui aurait pu imaginer cela ? Robert Redeker,un pro- à la merci de n’importe quel fanatique. Toutefois, le plus grave pour lui, c’est fesseur de philosophie, respectable et débonnaire, l’absence de réelle solidarité de son milieu professionnel. Seule une poi- totalement en règle avec les lois françaises, s’est trouvé gnée de ses collègues a participé au meeting de soutien, organisé le contraint à une semi-clandestinité au cœur même de 16 novembre dernier à Toulouse notamment par SOS-Racisme, Ni putes notre pays, patrie des droits de l’homme, en ce début ni soumises, le CRIF, Les Temps modernes et Le Meilleur des mondes. Et de XXIe siècle. Suite à la publication de son article sur si les directions des principaux syndi- cats enseignants ont, fin septembre, l’islam dans Le Figaro du 19 septembre 2006, l’au- dénoncé les menaces de mort visant Robert Redeker, le milieu enseignant tomne, pour lui, a viré au cauchemar. si prompt à faire grève ne semble guère perturbé par le drame que vit l’un des siens ! Après avoir erré quelques semaines jamais rien risqué pour leurs idées, se Il faut dire que le ministre de l’Éduca- avec son épouse, de maison en mai- gaussent d’une soi-disant « paranoïa » tion nationale n’a pas montré son, de « cache » en « cache » devrait- de Robert Redeker.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Europe: France
    France National Affairs THE CPE CRisis The most remarkable series of events to occur in France during 2006 was a two-month-long struggle, marked by violence, over a pro- posed new employment law. The proposal, Contrat premiere embauche (CPE)—First Employment Contract—was the government's effort to address youth unemployment, a key problem that had led to massive ri- oting in heavily Arab and black African immigrant ghettos around France in October—November 2005 (see AJYB 2006, pp. 337—39). While the overall French unemployment rate was close to 10 percent, the figure was 23 percent for young people, and possibly double that for those of im- migrant origin. Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin agreed with many economists that a major reason for high unemployment was that social-welfare laws were overly protective of workers' rights. Left-wing governments that ruled France off-and-on since 1936 had instituted legislation that effec- tively gave much of the French labor force either quasi-ensured contin- ual employment, or the guarantee of major financial compensation in case of dismissal. As a result, employers had become extremely wary of hiring people who had not proven their skills—principally inexperienced youths seeking to enter the workforce—or whom they were not sure they wanted to employ for long periods. While all sorts of temporary work contracts had been introduced in recent years to give employers more flex- ibility, unemployment remained stubbornly high. De Villepin's CPE made it easier to dismiss employees under age 26 dur- ing their first two years of employment by exempting their employers from the law requiring provable grounds for dismissal.
    [Show full text]
  • Victims of Intimidation Freedom of Speech Within Europe’S Muslim Communities
    Victims of Intimidation FREEDOM OF SPEECH WITHIN Europe’S MUSLIM COMMUNITIES Victims of Intimidation FREEDOM OF SPEECH WITHIN Europe’S MUSLIM COMMUNITIES Douglas Murray and Johan Pieter Verwey 2008 THE CENTRE FOR SOCIAL COHESION The Centre for Social Cohesion Clutha House 10 Storey’s Gate London SW1P 3AY Tel: +44 (0)20 7222 8909 Fax: +44 (0)5 601527476 Email: [email protected] www.socialcohesion.co.uk The Centre for Social Cohesion Limited by guarantee. Registered in England and Wales: No. 6609071 © The Centre for Social Cohesion,October 2008 All the Institute’s publications seek to further its objective of promoting the advancement of learning. The views expressed are those of the authors, not of the Institute. All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-9560013-1-3 Printed in Great Britain by The Cromwell Press Trowbridge, Wiltshire Contents Introduction xi Methodology xiii Politicians 1 n Ahmed Aboutaleb 2 n Mimount Bousakla 4 n Ekin Deligöz 6 n Ehsan Jami 8 n Naser Khader 11 n Samira Munir 14 n Nyamko Sabuni 16 n Manu Sareen 18 Journalists 21 n Magdi Allam 22 n Reda Hassaine 26 n Nosheen Ilyas 29 n Mohamed Sifaoui 31 Activists 35 n Mina Ahadi 36 n Ayaan Hirsi Ali 39 n Seyran Ates 43 n Mansur Escudero 47 n Maryam Namazie 49 n Kadra Noor 53 Writers & Academics 57 n Afshin Ellian 58 n Salman Rushdie 60 n Mohammad Anwar Shaikh 65 n Ibn Warraq 68 Artists 71 n Rachid Ben Ali 72 n Sooreh Hera 75 n Shabana Rehman 79 n Omar Sharif 83 n Deepika Thathaal 85 Conclusion 91 vi The authors Douglas Murray Douglas Murray is the Director of the Centre for Social Cohesion.
    [Show full text]
  • Réfugié Politique Dans Mon Propre Pays
    Retour à l’accueil. A mon père , Walter Réfugié politique dans mon propre pays. Par Robert Redeker * Début février, mon père, qui avait vu le jour en 1923 à Steinbergen, près de Hanovre est mort, dans son lit, un peu par surprise. Pendant l’heure où mère, née à Hildesheim en 1921, préparait le café du petit-déjeuner à la cuisine. Ces gens, de nationalité allemande, se sont installés dans le sud de la France, pour y mener une laborieuse et honnête vie d’ouvriers agricoles, voici plus de 60 ans. Les autorités policières ne nous permirent pas de faire afficher l’avis de décès à la mairie, sur le panneau d’état-civil, comme le veut la coutume. Il ne fut pas non plus possible de passer une annonce funèbre dans le quotidien local, La Dépêche du Midi . La sécurité l’imposait : personne ne devait savoir qu’un homme portant mon nom serait accompagnée dans sa dernière demeure, le mercredi 7 février. Ce serait beaucoup trop dangereux : on pourrait prendre des photos du cortège, et par la suite menacer certaines personnes, ou bien tirer dessus, jeter un coktail molotov ou une bombe. Nous – le cercle de famille – dûmes donc enterrer Walter Redeker, mon père, en cachette, dans la clandestinité. Comme des voleurs. Comme des pestiférés. Comme des exclus de la société. Comment en est-on arrivé là ? Courant septembre 2006 j’ai écrit dans un grand quotidien français, Le Figaro , un article titré “ Contre les intimidations islamistes, que doit faire le monde libre ? ”. Il s’agissait d’une vive critique de la pression que fait peser l’islam sur la vie quotidienne des pays occidentaux.
    [Show full text]
  • State-Dialogue with Muslim Communities in Italy and Germany
    ARTICLES State-Dialogue with Muslim Communities in Italy and Germany - The Political Context and the Legal Frame- works for Dialogue with Islamic Faith Communities in Both Countries By Hans-Christian Jasch∗ A. Introduction - Muslims in Europe: Integration and Security Estimates of the number of Muslims in EU Member States vary widely, depending on the methodology and definitions used and the geographical limits imposed. Excluding Turkey and the Balkan-regions, researchers estimate that as many as 13 to 20 million Muslims live in the EU: That is about 3.5 - 4% of the total EU population.1 Muslims are the largest religious minority in Europe, and Islam is the continent’s fastest growing religion. Substantial Muslim populations exist especially in Western European countries, including France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium and the Scandinavian Countries. Europe’s Muslim populations are ethnically diverse and Muslim immigrants in Europe hail from a variety of Middle Eastern, African, and Asian countries, as well ∗ The author is a government councillor in the German Federal Ministry of the Interior and has spent 18 months in 2005/6 as a fellow of the Bellevue-Programme of the Federal President’s Office of Germany and the Robert-Bosch-Foundation in Rome in the Italian Foreign Ministry and as an exchange-official in the cabinet of the Italian Minister of the Interior. Currently he is serving as a stagiaire structurel of the Federal German Ministry of the Interior at the Cabinet of Vice-President and Commissioner for Justice, Freedom and Security Franco Frattini in Brussels. This article reflects only the private opinions of the author.
    [Show full text]