DOCSLIB.ORG

Informacja O Działalności IPN W Okresie: 1 Stycznia 2007 R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Informacja O Działalności IPN W Okresie: 1 Stycznia 2007 R Spis treści Wykaz skrótów .................................................................................................................................... 5 Wstęp ......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Część I INFORMACJA O DZIAŁALNOŚCI INSTYTUTU PAMIĘCI NARODOWEJ – KOMISJI ŚCIGANIA ZBRODNI PRZECIWKO NARODOWI POLSKIEMU 1. Informacja o działalności Kolegium Instytutu Pamięci Narodowej Komisji Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu w okresie wrzesień 2007 – grudzień 2007 r. ... 13 2. Główna Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu ............................. 15 2.1. Wydział Nadzoru nad Śledztwami ...................................................................................... 15 2.2. Statystyka ................................................................................................................................. 17 3. Biuro Udostępniania i Archiwizacji Dokumentów ................................................................ 25 3.1. Ewidencja ................................................................................................................................. 26 3.1.1. Wydział Ewidencji .................................................................................................... 27 3.1.2. Referaty/Sekcje Ewidencji ....................................................................................... 28 3.1.3. Ewidencja – dane statystyczne .............................................................................. 34 3.2. Gromadzenie, opracowywanie i obsługa magazynów ............................................... 35 3.2.1. Wydział Gromadzenia, Opracowywania i Obsługi Magazynów ................ 35 3.2.2. Referaty/Sekcje Gromadzenia, Opracowywania i Obsługi Magazynów... 42 3.2.3. Gromadzenie, opracowywanie i obsługa magazynów – dane statystyczne. 48 3.3. Udostępnianie i informacja naukowa .............................................................................. 60 3.3.1. Wydział Udostępniania i Informacji Naukowej .............................................. 60 3.3.2. Referaty/Sekcje Udostępniania i Informacji Naukowej ................................. 67 3.4. Obsługa bieżąca .................................................................................................................... 78 3.4.1. Wydział Obsługi Bieżącej ...................................................................................... 78 3.4.2. Obsługa bieżąca – dane statystyczne .................................................................. 79 3.5. Badania archiwalne i edycja źródeł ................................................................................. 80 3.5.1. Opracowywanie monograficznych wydawnictw źródłowych ....................... 80 3.5.2. Redakcja czasopisma „Przegląd Archiwalny Instytutu Pamięci Narodo- wej” ............................................................................................................................... 81 3.5.3. Prace nad przygotowaniem „Informatora o zasobie archiwalnym Insty- tutu Pamięci Narodowej” ....................................................................................... 81 3.5.4. Współpraca archiwalno-historyczna z archiwum Służby Bezpieczeństwa Ukrainy ........................................................................................................................ 81 3.5.5. Współpraca archiwalno-historyczna z archiwum Federalnej Służby Bezpieczeństwa Federacji Rosyjskiej .................................................................. 82 3.5.6. Współpraca edytorska z jednostkami terenowymi BUiAD ........................... 82 3.5.7. Udział w innych projektach badawczych i indywidualnie opracowane prace naukowe .......................................................................................................... 83 4. Biuro Edukacji Publicznej ............................................................................................................ 84 4.1. Wydział Badań Naukowych, Dokumentacji, Ekspertyz i Zbiorów Bibliotecznych .... 84 4.1.1. Wydział Badań Naukowych, Dokumentacji, Ekspertyz i Zbiorów Biblio- tecznych ........................................................................................................................ 84 4.2. Wydział Wystaw i Edukacji Historycznej ........................................................................ 89 4.2.1. Działania edykacyjne i popularyzatorskie ......................................................... 90 4.2.2. Działania wystawiennicze, współpraca z mediami ......................................... 94 4.3. Wydział Wydawnictw ............................................................................................................. 96 3 5. Biuro Lustracyjne ............................................................................................................................. 98 5.1. Płaszczyzna organizacyjna .................................................................................................. 98 5.2. Zadania ustawowe ................................................................................................................ 101 6. Administracja ..................................................................................................................................... 113 6.1. Biuro Organizacyjne ............................................................................................................. 113 6.2. Biuro Prawne ........................................................................................................................... 114 6.2.1. Wydział Obsługi Prawnej ....................................................................................... 114 6.2.2. Wydział Legislacyjny................................................................................................. 115 6.2.3. Wydział Orzecznictwa ............................................................................................... 115 6.3. Wydział Informacji i Komunikacji Społecznej ............................................................... 116 6.4. Gospodarstwo Pomocnicze ............................................................................................... 119 7. Budżet .................................................................................................................................................. 121 7.1. Wykonanie dochodów budżetowych .................................................................................. 122 7.2. Wykonanie wydatków budżetowych ................................................................................. 123 7.2.1. Wykonanie wydatków w poszczególnych działach według klasyfikacji budżetowej ................................................................................................................... 125 7.2.2. Dotacje ......................................................................................................................... 125 7.2.3. Świadczenia na rzecz osób fizycznych ................................................................ 125 7.2.4. Wydatki bieżące .......................................................................................................... 126 7.2.5. Wydatki majątkowe .................................................................................................... 129 7.3. Zatrudnienie ........................................................................................................................... 131 Część II ANEKS DO INFORMACJI O DZIAŁALNOŚCI INSTYTUTU PAMIĘCI NARODOWEJ – KOMISJI ŚCIGANIA ZBRODNI PRZECIWKO NARODOWI POLSKIEMU OD 1 STYCZNIA DO 31 GRUDNIA 2007 r. Załącznik Nr 1: Śledztwa o szczególnym ciężarze gatunkowym prowadzone przez Od- działowe Komisje Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu .................................. 5 1. Oddziałowa Komisja w Białymstoku ....................................................................................... 5 2. Oddziałowa Komisja w Gdańsku............................................................................................... 11 3. Oddziałowa Komisja w Katowicach......................................................................................... 17 4. Oddziałowa Komisja w Krakowie ........................................................................................... 22 5. Oddziałowa Komisja w Lublinie ............................................................................................... 33 6. Oddziałowa Komisja w Łodzi ................................................................................................... 38 7. Oddziałowa Komisja w Poznaniu ........................................................................................... 42 8. Oddziałowa Komisja w Rzeszowie ......................................................................................... 47 9. Oddziałowa Komisja w Szczecinie ......................................................................................... 59 10. Oddziałowa Komisja w Warszawie .......................................................................................... 66 11. Oddziałowa Komisja we Wrocławiu ....................................................................................... 79 Załącznik Nr 2: Publikacje IPN ........................................................................................................ 87 Załącznik Nr 3: Publikacje pracowników IPN ............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Resurgence of Antisemitic Discourse in Poland Rafał Pankowski
    Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1080/23739770.2018.1492781 The Resurgence of Antisemitic Discourse in Poland Rafał Pankowski Rafał Pankowski is an associate professor in sociology at Warsaw’s Collegium Civitas University and a co-founder of the Nigdy Wiecej̨ [Never Again] Association, which monitors and combats antisemitism and xenophobia. His books include The Populist Radical Right in Poland (2010) and the forthcoming Poland: Inventing the Nation. The surge of hostility to Jews and the Jewish State in the Polish media and politics in early 2018 took many observers by surprise. For some, it was shocking to witness a virtual tidal wave of antisemitism in the mainstream discourse of one of the largest member states of the European Union—on territory which, during the German occupation, was the epicenter of the Holocaust. It was also a great shock because for many years, bilateral relations between Poland and Israel had been especially cordial and fruitful. While the history of antisemitism in Poland is relatively well known and has been thoroughly researched, few observers adequately assessed its potential as a tool with which to whip up the masses in contemporary Polish society. As late as Feb- ruary 4, 2018, Jonny Daniels, a controversial Anglo-Israeli public relations specialist frequently quoted in the Polish media on Jewish issues, boldly declared, “There is no such thing as Polish antisemitism.”1 Daniels, who mysteriously sur- faced in Poland after the elections in 2015 that brought the radical, right-wing Prawo i Sprawiedliwosċ́(PiS) party to power, became the Orthodox Jewish poster boy of the Polish right.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Death Camps Obrona
    December 2019 (REVISED) Why it matters not to refer to Nazi German camps as “Polish” The story you won’t find in the North American mainstream media Poland’s new anti-defamation law has sparked an avalanche of alarmist commentary and harsh criticism.1 Extravagant claims have been made about the scope and intent of the law as, allegedly, suppressing discussion of Second World War crimes committed by Poles. Outrageous charges, often accompanied by unbridled hysteria, are being levelled against the Polish government, which is accused of “Holocaust denial” and even anti-Semitism. The Foreign Affairs and Defence Committee of the Knesset declared that “the Polish law is a crime and we will not allow it to happen.” Jack Rosen, President of the American Jewish Congress and chairman of the American Council for World Jewry, goes even further, claiming that Poland has put itself “in the same team as Iran and other Islamic terror states and the alt-right in the US and Holocaust deniers.” The anti-defamation law has also released pent-up aggression against Poles. However, the North American media rarely, if ever, mentions this aspect in the tsunami of articles critical of Poland. They show no apparent concern for the many rancorous statements by prominent Jews mentioned later on. In fact, the 1 On January 26, 2018 and February 1, 2018, respectively, the Seym (lower chamber) and Senate of the Polish Parliament passed legislation, commonly referred to as an “anti-defamation law,” which was proclaimed into law on February 6, 2019 by Poland’s President. It was an amendment to the 1998 Act on the Institute of National Remembrance – Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Proceedings Against Colonel Feliks Michałowski (1952-1953)
    Annuals of the Administration and Law no. 17 (1), p. 83-101 Original article Received: 16.03.2017 Accepted: 11.05.2017 Published: 30.06.2017 The funding sources for the publication: author’s own resources Authors’ Contribution: (A) Study Design (B) Data Collection (C) Statistical Analysis (D) Data Interpretation (E) Manuscript Preparation (F) Literature Search Elżbieta Romanowska* CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST COLONEL FELIKS MICHAŁOWSKI (1952-1953) In May 1943, the 1st Polish Infantry Division named after Tadeusz Kosciuszko was created in the USSR. It was the nucleus of the future Polish Armed Forces creat- ed in the territory of the USSR. With the formation of the 1st Infantry Division, the Military Information was created otherwise called Military Counterintelligence1. Military Information was one of the most criminal institutions in the Stalinist Po- land. From 1949 to 1953, the bodies of this institution arrested 2665 people, includ- * PhD; Institute of National Remembrance in Warsaw. 1 See. S. Cenckiewicz, Długie ramię Moskwy. Wywiad wojskowy Polski Ludowej 1943-1991, Poznań 2011; A. Pietrzak, Główny Zarząd Informacji wobec flagowców 1949-1956, Warsaw 2011; L. Pawliko- wicz, Tajny front zimnej wojny. Uciekinierzy z polskich służb specjalnych 1956-1964, Warsaw 2004; P. Semków, Informacja Marynarki Wojennej w latach 1945-1957, Warsaw 2006; J. Poksiński, „TUN” Tatar-Utnik-Nowicki. Represje wobec oficerów Wojska Polskiego w latach 1949-1956, Warsaw 1992; idem, Victis Honos, Spisek w wojsku, Warsaw 1994; W. Tkaczew, Powstanie i działalność organów In- formacji Wojska Polskiego w latach 1943-1948. Kontrwywiad wojskowy, Warsaw 1994; idem, Organa Informacji Wojska Polskiego 1943-1956, Warsaw 2007. 84 ANNUALS OF THE ADMINISTRATION AND LAW.
    [Show full text]
  • Generate PDF of This Page
    Institute of National Remembrance https://ipn.gov.pl/en/news/1477,European-Arrest-Warrant-for-Stefan-Michnik-a-former-judge-of-the-Mil itary-Distri.html 2021-09-30, 11:03 08.11.2018 European Arrest Warrant for Stefan Michnik, a former judge of the Military District Court in Warsaw The Branch Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation in Warsaw is conducting an investigation against Stefan Michnik, a former judge of the Military District Court in Warsaw. He is suspected of committing thirty crimes constituting communist crimes, falling within the scope of crimes against humanity, which involved issuing unlawful sentences adjudicating capital punishment and imprisonment for persons working towards sovereignty of the Polish State. The suspected crimes were perpetrated in the years 1952- 1953 in Warsaw. In the course of the proceedings evidence material was gathered that gave grounds for assuming that judge Stefan Michnik compromised the principle of objectivity, and when ruling in criminal matters he was primarily guided by ideological premises, seeking physical elimination of people perceived by the former authorities as political opponents. His assessment of evidence was discretionary, without any objective evidence against the defendants, and thus he unjustifiably imputed alleged acts to them. Moreover, when forming the punishment, he adopted a principle that the defendants "are highly dangerous for the rest of the society", not taking into account any circumstances in their favour (young age, no previous criminal record, repentance). Stefan Michnik, among others, presided over a body of judges of the Military District Court in Warsaw, which in 5 January 1953 passed a death sentence on the activist of the independence organization "Kraj".
    [Show full text]
  • FREE POLAND SPECIAL REPORT No 3
    MOOS IFIEO AND RELEASED BY UN1RA INTELLIGENCE AGENCY SOURCES METHODS EXEMPT ION3B28 NA Z I WAR CR IMES DISCLOSURE AC1 DATE 2004 2006 FREE POLAND SPECIAL REPORT No 3 The WOLNA POLSKA [Free Poland] Fighting Organization is based-- in accordanCe with out Political Manifesto--on historical ideals of political independence of the United States Consti- tution and by virtue of this is conducting an open struggle for Freedom and Independence of Poland. The struggle for the liberation of Poland from the Soviet yoke, conducted jointly with the legal authorities of Independent Poland in Great Britain and other countries, is directed by us primarily against all those in . Poland and. abroad whose activity is harmful to the interest of Poland and the Polish Nation. We publish the names of such . persons systematically in black lists and in "Communi- ques from the Battlefield," and in the journal "SOHO WEEKLY NEWS" made available to us for this purpose. We receive Many .letters from true patriots, persons actively engaged in the struggle for independence, and sympathizers of FREE POLAND. It is very gratifying to have so many friends throughout the whole world. Following disclosure of the names of agents of the Security Service of the MSW and of the Information Service of the PRL Armed Forces in Special , Report No 2, a real avalanche of let- ters poured in to the Administration of TREE POLAND. We have received from various countries, including Poland, much data relating also to CIA and FBI agents acting against the interests Of the Republic of Poland, the legal Government of the Republic of Poland in Exile, and Polish organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Why USA Is Backstabbing Its Faithful Ally Poland?
    Why USA is backstabbing its faithful ally Poland? The Honorable Ed Royce Chairman House Foreign Affairs Committee Dear Chairman Royce: The POLISH AMERICAN CONGRESS represents the interests of Americans of Polish heritage who are convinced that their ancestral country, Poland, as a key NATO ally, protects United States national security interests in Central and Eastern Europe and promotes the values of freedom and limited government in that dangerous part of the world. 1. Res. 447, known as the JUST ACT OF 2017, includes Poland among countries, which were Axis allies during World War II, such as Romania and Hungary. A parallel resolution H.R. 1226 is under consideration by your committee. It also appears to ignore, or evade, moral and historical principles of high importance, with the result that H.R. conflates victims with villains. Poland’s unique circumstances, as a victim nation of German and Soviet aggression in September 1939, which started World War II by virtue of the mutually-planned and executed Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact, need to be recognized by Congress in these matters. The language of HR 1226 proposes that claims (under Terezin Declaration definitions) could be made against today’s Polish State for crimes today’s Poles did not commit. Stunningly, this completely ignores that the monstrous crimes perpetrated on Polish territory by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union were followed by massive property transfers carried out directly by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. Indeed, Poland’s history from 1795 to 1918 found her wiped from the map of Europe by way of the infamous three Partitions of 1772, 1793, and 1795 that had been engineered by her contiguous imperial neighbors, Russia, Austria, and Prussia (the latter nation being an integral progenitor of Nazi Germany).
    [Show full text]
  • The Dialectics of Pain:1 the Interrogation Methods of the Communist Secret Police in Poland, 1944-1955 Marek Jan Chodakiewicz
    Marek Jan Chodakiewicz, The Dialectics of Pain Glaukopis, vol. 2/3 (2004-2005) The Dialectics of Pain:1 The Interrogation Methods of the Communist Secret Police in Poland, 1944-1955 Marek Jan Chodakiewicz Find the man and we shall find a paragraph for him. A Stalinist saying Our task is not only to destroy you physically, but also to smash you morally before the eyes of the society.2 Major Wiktor Herer, a superior officer at the Office of Public Security, to a prisoner, 1948 The duty of the public security is to beat the enemy; the duty of the prosecutor is to guard revolutionary legality. Each of those organs has its own methods of work.3 Józef Różański, Director of the Investigative Department of the Ministry of Public Security, Warsaw, December 1950 I believe that Christ will be victorious! Poland will regain her independence and human dignity will be restored. 4 Lieutenant Colonel Łukasz Ciepliński, a Polish underground leader, shortly before his execution, December 1950. Throughout the ages, torture has been applied to extract information needed for a utilitarian purpose. With a few exceptions,5 the objective has been to find out the truth. According to a 3rd century legal authority, Ulpian, “By quaestio [torture] we are to understand the torment and suffering of the body in order to elicit the truth.” Writing in the 13th century the judicial 1 This paper was written for the 61st Annual Meeting of the Polish Institute of Arts and Sciences of America (PIASA) at McGill University, Montreal, Canada, June 6-7, 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Przegląd Archiwalny Instytutu Pamięci Narodowej
    PRZEGLĄD ARCHIWALNY INSTYTUTU PAMIĘCI NARODOWEJ Tom 1 ISSN 1899–1254 WARSZAWA 2008 PRZEGLĄD ARCHIWALNY INSTYTUTU PAMIĘCI NARODOWEJ PRZEGLĄD ARCHIWALNY INSTYTUTU PAMIĘCI NARODOWEJ Tom 1 WARSZAWA 2008 Recenzenci Bohdan Ryszewski Antoni Dudek Zespół Redakcyjny Tomasz Balbus, Jerzy Bednarek (redaktor naczelny), Rafał Dyrcz, Rafał Leśkiewicz, Bartłomiej Noszczak, Paweł Perzyna (sekretarz redakcji) Projekt grafi czny Krzysztof Findziński Redakcja techniczna Andrzej Broniak Skład i łamanie Wojciech Czaplicki Korekta Wanda Chudzik Tłumaczenie streszczeń na język angielski Matylda Górzyńska Druk i oprawa Instytut Technologii Eksploatacji ul. Pułaskiego 6/10, 26-600 Radom © Copyright by Instytut Pamięci Narodowej Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu ISSN 1899–1254 Wydział Badań Archiwalnych i Edycji Źródeł Biuro Udostępniania i Archiwizacji Dokumentów Instytutu Pamięci Narodowej 00-869 Warszawa, ul. Towarowa 28 tel. (0 22) 581 86 01, faks (0 22) 581 89 48, e-mail: [email protected] Przegląd Archiwalny Instytutu Pamięci Narodowej tom 1 SPIS TREŚCI Przedmowa . 9 Od Redakcji . 11 I. Archiwum Paweł Perzyna, Marta Polańska-Bergman Archiwum Instytutu Pamięci Narodowej – aspekty prawne funkcjonowania i udostępniania materiałów archiwalnych w latach 2000–2007 . 13 Stefan Białek Proces przekazywania dokumentów przez Komendę Wojewódzką Policji w Opolu do archiwum Oddziału IPN we Wrocławiu (2002–2007) . 35 II. Zasób archiwalny Marcin Majewski Dokumenty dotyczące Ericha Kocha w zasobie archiwalnym Instytutu Pamięci Narodowej w Warszawie. 41 Przemysław Wojciechowski Ofi ary drugiej wojny światowej w powiecie kluczborskim na Opolszczyźnie w świetle akt spraw uznania za zmarłego . 69 Rafał Leśkiewicz Badanie procesów archiwotwórczych na przykładzie akt Wojskowego Sądu Rejonowego w Poznaniu (1946–1955) . 85 Janusz Oszytko Repertoria Wojskowego Sądu Rejonowego w Opolu jako źródło do badań nad represjami komunistycznymi w województwie opolskim w latach 1950–1954 .
    [Show full text]
  • Page 11 Your Help Is Needed Get Involved in Polonia! Join a Polish Organization
    News of Polonia Pasadena, California July 2008 Page 11 Chodakiewicz from 10 Dariusz Iwaneczko by Mariusz Pamięci Narodowej, no. 6 (June 2002): 26- Nasz Dziennik, 8 June 2005; and on the Kamieniecki, “Kaci przemyskiej bezpieki,” 28. [UP] lackluster prosecution of the policemen Dziennik, 7 January 2003. According to Nasz Dziennik, 5 November 2004. [UP] [159] Other investigations are under way as guilty of beating the protesters during the Radziszewski, the Mazovia branch of the [145] Krajewski and Łabuszewski, well. For instance, 29 prison guards have 1976 riots in Radom see “Proces ruszy od MOR had about 30 members, mostly high- "Łupaszka”, "Młot”, "Huzar”, 548 n. 8. been identified who tortured Polish nowa,” Nasz Dziennik, 21 May 2003; as schoolers. They were active between 1948 [UP] independentists in Rawicz prison near well as on similarly lenient handling of the and 1950, when the secret police destroyed [146] In 2004 Wybraniec was sentenced to 6 Poznań between 1945 and 1956. The most perpetrators of the Baltic Coast massacre in their organizations. At least 4 managed to years but he remains free, pending an sadistic guards were the prison warden 1970 see j.o., “Sąd usprawiedliwił flee to Wolin, where they continued their appeal. See Jerzy Morawski, “Kat Kazimierz Szymanowicz, Jerzy Cymbalista, Jaruzelskiego,” Rzeczpospolita, 10 May activities, recruiting new members. [UP] Zamojszczyzny,” Rzeczpospolita, 20 Bronisław Łukasiewicz, Bronisław Komar, 2005. [UP] [130] See J.O. “Kulik: Dziennikarze to psy,” February 2002; Robert Horbaczewski, “Kat Tadeusz Kulik, Jerzy Precel, Stanisław [161] In the case of torture of General Rzeczpospolita, 2 February 2002; Agata Zamojszczyzny nie stawił się w sądzie,” Bochenek, and Jerzy Utrata.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing Memory of the Debates And, Most Importantly, the Panorama of Opinions Revealed in the Process
    5 The book aims to reconstruct and analyze the disputes over the Polish- Jewish past and memory in public debates in Poland between 1985 and 2012, Piotr Forecki from the discussions about Claude Lanzmann’s Shoah, Jan Bło´nski’s essay The Poor Poles Look at the Ghetto, Jan Tomasz Gross’ books Neighbours, Fear and Golden Harvest, to the controversies surrounding the premiere of Władysław Pasikowski’s The Aftermath. The analysis includes the course and dynamics Reconstructing Memory of the debates and, most importantly, the panorama of opinions revealed in the process. It embraces the debates held across the entire spectrum The Holocaust in Polish Public Debates of the national press. The selection of press was not limited by the level of circulation or a subjective opinion of their value. The main intention was to reconstruct the widest possible variety of opinions that were revealed during the debates. Broad symbolic elites participated in the debates: people who exercised control over publicly accessible knowledge, legitimacy of beliefs and the content of public discourse. GESCHICHTE ERINNERUNG POLITIK Piotr Forecki, PhD, is Assistant Professor of the Section of Political Culture Posener Studien zur Geschichts-, at the Faculty of Political Science and Journalism of the Adam Mickiewicz University in Pozna´n (Poland). He is a member of the Jewish Historical Insti- Kultur- und Politikwissenschaft tute Association. His academic research concerns the Polish memory of the Herausgegeben von Anna Wolff-Powe˛ska Holocaust, the representation of
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACTS & BIOS 9-10 November 2020 International Scientific
    9-10 November 2020 International Scientific Conference organized by the Justice Institute ABSTRACTS & BIOS Institutionalisation of Historical Revisionism in Russia? Since 2014, Russia’s leadership has significantly intensified its historical policy aimed at undermining the European consensus on shared responsibility for the crimes of totalitarian regimes, that constitutes either denial or excuse the crimes of the Soviet totalitarian regime. Using primarily the pretext of the memory of the victory in World War II, Russia’s government is trying to aggressively impose its view of the history of the twentieth century on society, using ‘memory legislation’ and other institutional means. The presentation addresses aforementioned attempts of Russian government, including recent constitutional and legislative changes, in light of international law and relevant state practice. Gleb Bogush Associate Professor (National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE), Moscow), expert in international criminal law, the law of the use of force, international humanitarian law, human rights law, and Russian law, author of numerous publications on Russian and international law. His recent publications and talks deal with the issues of criminal responsibility for core international crimes, including the crime of aggression, national implementation of international law in Russian legal order, and the history of international criminal justice. https://www.hse.ru/en/staff/bogush *** International Criminal Responsibility of the Communist Party of the
    [Show full text]
  • First Attempts at Undoing the Consequences of Violating the Rule of Law in 1944–1956**
    7 PRAWO W DZIAŁANIU LAW IN ACTION 38/2019 DOI: 10.32041/pwd.3801 Maria Stanowska* First Attempts at Undoing the Consequences of Violating the Rule of Law in 1944–1956** I. DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL AND FACTUAL CONDITIONS ENABLING THE APPLICATION OF SEVERE REPRESSIVE PUNISHMENTS The end, in May 1945, of World War II in Europe and the liberation of the Polish territory from the German occupation did not bring Poland full independence. The new authorities, recognizing the superior role of the Soviet Union, did their best to break any resistance on the part of the society that objected to limitation of the Polish state’s sovereignty. In order to achieve the purpose, state terror was applied in 1944–19561. Criminal law, enforced with the help of the system of justice and investigative bodies ensured effective fi ght against political opponents. Care was taken to cre- ate adequate conditions which would make it possible to apply severe repressions, among others, through the enforcement of decrees passed by the Polish Committee of National Liberation: the Criminal Code of the Polish Army2 of 23 September 1944 and the Decree on the protection of the State3 of 30 October 1944, with the sanction of capital punishment in every provision, as well as the Decree of Council of Ministers of 16 November 1945 on crimes particularly dangerous at the time of rebuilding the country4, replaced with the Decree of the same name of 13 June 19465 (the so-called ‘little criminal code’). The severity of repressions was further enhanced by the Decree of the Council of Ministers of 16 November 1945 on summary proceedings6, allowing the imposition of capital punishment or life imprisonment * Marta Stanowska is a Doctor of law sciences, retired Member of the Offi ce for Studies and Analyses of the Supreme Court, Poland, Email: [email protected] ** The manuscript was submitted by the author on 12 December 2018; the manuscript was accepted for publication by the editorial board on 6 March 2019.
    [Show full text]