First Attempts at Undoing the Consequences of Violating the Rule of Law in 1944–1956**

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

First Attempts at Undoing the Consequences of Violating the Rule of Law in 1944–1956** 7 PRAWO W DZIAŁANIU LAW IN ACTION 38/2019 DOI: 10.32041/pwd.3801 Maria Stanowska* First Attempts at Undoing the Consequences of Violating the Rule of Law in 1944–1956** I. DEVELOPMENT OF LEGAL AND FACTUAL CONDITIONS ENABLING THE APPLICATION OF SEVERE REPRESSIVE PUNISHMENTS The end, in May 1945, of World War II in Europe and the liberation of the Polish territory from the German occupation did not bring Poland full independence. The new authorities, recognizing the superior role of the Soviet Union, did their best to break any resistance on the part of the society that objected to limitation of the Polish state’s sovereignty. In order to achieve the purpose, state terror was applied in 1944–19561. Criminal law, enforced with the help of the system of justice and investigative bodies ensured effective fi ght against political opponents. Care was taken to cre- ate adequate conditions which would make it possible to apply severe repressions, among others, through the enforcement of decrees passed by the Polish Committee of National Liberation: the Criminal Code of the Polish Army2 of 23 September 1944 and the Decree on the protection of the State3 of 30 October 1944, with the sanction of capital punishment in every provision, as well as the Decree of Council of Ministers of 16 November 1945 on crimes particularly dangerous at the time of rebuilding the country4, replaced with the Decree of the same name of 13 June 19465 (the so-called ‘little criminal code’). The severity of repressions was further enhanced by the Decree of the Council of Ministers of 16 November 1945 on summary proceedings6, allowing the imposition of capital punishment or life imprisonment * Marta Stanowska is a Doctor of law sciences, retired Member of the Offi ce for Studies and Analyses of the Supreme Court, Poland, Email: [email protected] ** The manuscript was submitted by the author on 12 December 2018; the manuscript was accepted for publication by the editorial board on 6 March 2019. 1 For more details, see M. Stanowska, Rehabilitation of People Repressed for Activity for the Independence of Poland in the Years 1944–1956 in the Practice of the Warsaw Court, Prawo w Działaniu 32(2017), 7 et seq. 2 Polish journal of laws Dz.U. No. 6, item 27, as amended. 3 Dz.U. No. 10, item 50. 4 Dz.U. No. 53, item 300. 5 Dz.U. No. 30, item 192. 6 Dz.U. No. 53, item 301. 8 Maria Stanowska regardless of whether the law provided for such punishments for a given offence, with no possibility of appealing judgments issued in summary proceedings7. Changes made in the criminal procedure gradually phased out the independence of the investigating magistrate8 to fi nally eliminate it altogether when the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1928 was amended9. Preparatory proceedings were entrusted to the prosecutor (or military prosecutor) and public security offi cers (or Polish Army Intelligence Service offi cers). These bodies were also authorized to apply pre- trial detention. This state of law made it easy to detain people in relation to whom proceedings had not even been formally instituted. The absence of any control over the preparatory proceedings made it possible to ruthlessly deal with real or alleged political opponents. All too often, detention was also excessively extended. The prosecutor’s offi ce became actually subordinated to special services. The trial was in turn dominated by the prosecutor who actually directed the court proceedings. Thus, it was the public security or Military Intelligence Service authorities that had the decisive voice in the court proceedings. The communist authorities also had ensured monopoly in appointing judges. The appointment of judges, with the requirement of the procedure being repeated every year, was entrusted to the Minister of Justice. Pursuant to the Decree of 22 February 1946 on the registration and compulsory employment in the system of justice of people qualifi ed to take the position of a judge10, the Minister of Justice could, until the end of 1946, employ these people to work in the system of jus- tice for a period of one year with a possibility of extension for another year. The Decree, extended by subsequent amendments, remained in force until the end of 1952. In addition, what was abandoned in the Decree of 22 January 1946 on the exceptional admission to taking the positions of judges, prosecutors and notaries as well as to being entered on the list of attorneys-at-law11 was the previously absolute requirement of completing university studies in law and judicial training12. Pursu- ant to this instrument, the Minister of Justice could, during the 5 years from the entry in force of the Decree, appoint, among others, for the position of a judge, a person exempt from the obligation to have law studies and judicial training. The binding force of the Decree was also extended13. It was thus obvious that judges of this kind would offer full cooperation to the authorities. In addition, the hitherto effective ban, forbidding judges from being members of a political party, resul- ting from Article 121 of the Law on the Organization of General Courts (‘and in particular a judge must not belong to any political faction’)14, guaranteeing judges’ 7 Summary proceedings were applied only in general courts. 8 A. Lityński, O prawie i sądach początków Polski Ludowej, Białystok, 1999, 117–122. 9 Law of 27 April 1949 on Amendments to the Provisions on the Criminal Procedure, Dz.U. No. 32, item 238. 10 Dz.U. No. 9, item 65. 11 Dz.U. No. 4, item 33. 12 Interestingly, attorneys-at-law were not released from the obligation of completing law studies and passing examinations required by the law. According to I.S. Grat, the opinion of the Ministry of Justice seemed to indicate that the abandonment of this obligation could adversely affect ‘the professional and ethical standards of the Bar’ – I.S. Grat, Uchwalenie dekretu z 22 stycznia 1946 r o wyjątkowym dopuszczeniu do obejmowania stanowisk sędziowskich, prokuratorskich i notarialnych oraz do wpisania na listę adwokatów, Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica, 6/107(2008), p. 107. 13 The last extension was made by the Law of 29 December 1951. 14 Order of the President of the Republic of Poland of 6 February 1928 – Law on the System of General Courts, Dz.U. No. 12, item 93. First Attempts at Undoing the Consequences of Violating the Rule of Law in 1944–1956 9 impartiality, was repealed by the Decree of the 14 March 1945 on amendments to the Law on the Organization of General Courts15. The communist authorities’ lack of confi dence in general courts resulted in a signifi cant limitation of the competence of general courts in favour of military courts16. The system of military courts was organized from scratch and this provided full control over their activity. Military courts did what they were expected to do. The sentences were very severe. There were approximately 100,000, perhaps even 150,000 of political prisoners sentenced to long-term imprisonment for anti-state offences. In the years 1944–1947 alone, over 2,500 people were convicted to capital punishment for political offences17. J. Paśnik reports that in 1945–1953 military courts convicted over 81,000 people18 (including 65,000 people in 1946–1953 alone) of crimes against the state and the penalties imposed were very severe. According to Z. Leszczyńska, who presented profi les of the persons convicted by the Military Court of the Garrison of Lublin and the Military Court in Lublin in 1944–1945, at the Lublin Castle alone 210 people were sentenced to capital punishment and 125 of them were executed. The sentenced were (apart from 26 deserters from the army) people who had fought for independence, predominantly Home Army soldiers19. More than half of those convicted in 1950–1953 were sentenced to imprisonment for over 5 years, life sentences, and capital punish- ments20. A. Lityński estimates that in 1945–1954 approximately 5,860 people were sentenced to capital punishment for offences against the state and 70% of those sentences were carried out21. The authorities did not stop at providing legal safeguards. What guaranteed strict performance of the new tasks was – following the Soviet model – adequate cadre. It was the tried and tested Soviet offi cers who were entrusted with the formation of the Military Intelligence Service. At the beginning of 1946, 90.3% of executive posts in the MIS were still occupied by Soviet offi cers. Although the situation gradually changed as the Polish cadre were being prepared22, there is no doubt that Soviet offi cers in the Polish Army Intelligence Service formations, with Dmitry Voznesenski, head of the Main Board of the Polish Army Intelligence Service, played a signifi cant role in the development of a repressive policy in the armed forces23. Soviet offi cers also acted as prosecutors in the Supreme Military Prosecutor’s Offi ce, judges in the Supreme Military Court, as well as advisors 15 Dz.U. No. 9, item 46. 16 It was only the Law of 5 April 1955 on the Transfer to General Courts of the Hitherto Jurisdiction of Mi- litary Courts in Criminal Cases Concerning Civilians, Public Security Offi cers, Citizen’s Militia and Prison Service (Dz.U. No. 15, item 122) that restored the jurisdiction of general courts over a vast majority of these offences (with the exception of espionage). 17 M. Turlejska, Te pokolenia żałobami czarne… Skazani na śmierć i ich sędziowie, Warszawa, 1990, 26, 106–107. 18 J. Paśnik, Prawne aspekty represji stalinowskich w Polsce, Dziś 7/101(1991), p. 101. 19 Z. Leszczyńska, Ginę za to co najgłębiej człowiek ukochać może.
Recommended publications
  • The Resurgence of Antisemitic Discourse in Poland Rafał Pankowski
    Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1080/23739770.2018.1492781 The Resurgence of Antisemitic Discourse in Poland Rafał Pankowski Rafał Pankowski is an associate professor in sociology at Warsaw’s Collegium Civitas University and a co-founder of the Nigdy Wiecej̨ [Never Again] Association, which monitors and combats antisemitism and xenophobia. His books include The Populist Radical Right in Poland (2010) and the forthcoming Poland: Inventing the Nation. The surge of hostility to Jews and the Jewish State in the Polish media and politics in early 2018 took many observers by surprise. For some, it was shocking to witness a virtual tidal wave of antisemitism in the mainstream discourse of one of the largest member states of the European Union—on territory which, during the German occupation, was the epicenter of the Holocaust. It was also a great shock because for many years, bilateral relations between Poland and Israel had been especially cordial and fruitful. While the history of antisemitism in Poland is relatively well known and has been thoroughly researched, few observers adequately assessed its potential as a tool with which to whip up the masses in contemporary Polish society. As late as Feb- ruary 4, 2018, Jonny Daniels, a controversial Anglo-Israeli public relations specialist frequently quoted in the Polish media on Jewish issues, boldly declared, “There is no such thing as Polish antisemitism.”1 Daniels, who mysteriously sur- faced in Poland after the elections in 2015 that brought the radical, right-wing Prawo i Sprawiedliwosċ́(PiS) party to power, became the Orthodox Jewish poster boy of the Polish right.
    [Show full text]
  • Poles As Pigs in MAUS the Problems with Spiegelman’S MAUS
    May 2019 Poles as Pigs in MAUS The Problems with Spiegelman’s MAUS Spiegelman’s representation of Poles as pigs is “a calculated insult” leveled against Poles. The Norton Anthology of American Literature, 7th edition Maus made me feel that Poland was somehow responsible for the Holocaust, or at least that many Poles collaborated in it.1 These materials were prepared for the Canadian Polish Congress by a team of researchers and reviewed for accuracy by historians at the Institute for World Politics, Washington, DC. 1. Background MAUS is a comic book – sometimes called a graphic novel – authored by American cartoonist Art Spiegelman. The core of the book is an extended interview by the author/narrator with his father, a Polish Jew named Vladek, focusing on his experiences as a Holocaust survivor. Although MAUS has been described as both a memoir and fiction, it is widely treated as non-fiction. Time placed it on their list of non-fiction books. MAUS is considered to be a postmodern book. It is a story about storytelling that weaves several conflicting narratives (historical, psychological and autobiographical). The book employs various postmodern techniques as well as older literary devices. A prominent feature of the book is the author’s depiction of 1 Seth J. Frantzman, “Setting History Straight – Poland Resisted Nazis,” Jerusalem Post, January 29, 2018. 1 national groups in the form of different kinds of animals: Jews are drawn as mice, Germans as cats, and (Christian) Poles as pigs. MAUS has been taught widely in U.S. high schools, and even elementary schools, as part of the literature curriculum for many years.
    [Show full text]
  • Polish Death Camps Obrona
    December 2019 (REVISED) Why it matters not to refer to Nazi German camps as “Polish” The story you won’t find in the North American mainstream media Poland’s new anti-defamation law has sparked an avalanche of alarmist commentary and harsh criticism.1 Extravagant claims have been made about the scope and intent of the law as, allegedly, suppressing discussion of Second World War crimes committed by Poles. Outrageous charges, often accompanied by unbridled hysteria, are being levelled against the Polish government, which is accused of “Holocaust denial” and even anti-Semitism. The Foreign Affairs and Defence Committee of the Knesset declared that “the Polish law is a crime and we will not allow it to happen.” Jack Rosen, President of the American Jewish Congress and chairman of the American Council for World Jewry, goes even further, claiming that Poland has put itself “in the same team as Iran and other Islamic terror states and the alt-right in the US and Holocaust deniers.” The anti-defamation law has also released pent-up aggression against Poles. However, the North American media rarely, if ever, mentions this aspect in the tsunami of articles critical of Poland. They show no apparent concern for the many rancorous statements by prominent Jews mentioned later on. In fact, the 1 On January 26, 2018 and February 1, 2018, respectively, the Seym (lower chamber) and Senate of the Polish Parliament passed legislation, commonly referred to as an “anti-defamation law,” which was proclaimed into law on February 6, 2019 by Poland’s President. It was an amendment to the 1998 Act on the Institute of National Remembrance – Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Criminal Proceedings Against Colonel Feliks Michałowski (1952-1953)
    Annuals of the Administration and Law no. 17 (1), p. 83-101 Original article Received: 16.03.2017 Accepted: 11.05.2017 Published: 30.06.2017 The funding sources for the publication: author’s own resources Authors’ Contribution: (A) Study Design (B) Data Collection (C) Statistical Analysis (D) Data Interpretation (E) Manuscript Preparation (F) Literature Search Elżbieta Romanowska* CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST COLONEL FELIKS MICHAŁOWSKI (1952-1953) In May 1943, the 1st Polish Infantry Division named after Tadeusz Kosciuszko was created in the USSR. It was the nucleus of the future Polish Armed Forces creat- ed in the territory of the USSR. With the formation of the 1st Infantry Division, the Military Information was created otherwise called Military Counterintelligence1. Military Information was one of the most criminal institutions in the Stalinist Po- land. From 1949 to 1953, the bodies of this institution arrested 2665 people, includ- * PhD; Institute of National Remembrance in Warsaw. 1 See. S. Cenckiewicz, Długie ramię Moskwy. Wywiad wojskowy Polski Ludowej 1943-1991, Poznań 2011; A. Pietrzak, Główny Zarząd Informacji wobec flagowców 1949-1956, Warsaw 2011; L. Pawliko- wicz, Tajny front zimnej wojny. Uciekinierzy z polskich służb specjalnych 1956-1964, Warsaw 2004; P. Semków, Informacja Marynarki Wojennej w latach 1945-1957, Warsaw 2006; J. Poksiński, „TUN” Tatar-Utnik-Nowicki. Represje wobec oficerów Wojska Polskiego w latach 1949-1956, Warsaw 1992; idem, Victis Honos, Spisek w wojsku, Warsaw 1994; W. Tkaczew, Powstanie i działalność organów In- formacji Wojska Polskiego w latach 1943-1948. Kontrwywiad wojskowy, Warsaw 1994; idem, Organa Informacji Wojska Polskiego 1943-1956, Warsaw 2007. 84 ANNUALS OF THE ADMINISTRATION AND LAW.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruno Kamiński
    Fear Management. Foreign threats in the postwar Polish propaganda – the influence and the reception of the communist media (1944 -1956) Bruno Kamiński Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Florence, 14 June 2016 European University Institute Department of History and Civilization Fear Management. Foreign threats in the postwar Polish propaganda – the influence and the reception of the communist media (1944 -1956) Bruno Kamiński Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Examining Board Prof. Pavel Kolář (EUI) - Supervisor Prof. Alexander Etkind (EUI) Prof. Anita Prażmowska (London School Of Economics) Prof. Dariusz Stola (University of Warsaw and Polish Academy of Science) © Bruno Kamiński, 2016 No part of this thesis may be copied, reproduced or transmitted without prior permission of the author Researcher declaration to accompany the submission of written work Department of History and Civilization - Doctoral Programme I <Bruno Kamiński> certify that I am the author of the work < Fear Management. Foreign threats in the postwar Polish propaganda – the influence and the reception of the communist media (1944 -1956)> I have presented for examination for the Ph.D. at the European University Institute. I also certify that this is solely my own original work, other than where I have clearly indicated, in this declaration and in the thesis, that it is the work of others. I warrant that I have obtained all the permissions required for using any material from other copyrighted publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Pubfactory at 09/25/2021 10:15:12AM Via Free Access 136 Chapter 4
    Chapter 4 The Myth of Unity (1956–59) Memory Unbound The Thaw in Poland has traditionally been described in terms of confl icts between opposing cliques in the corridors of power. Some authors examine the ethnic and ideological tensions between Polish Communists; others argue that the political changes were a ‘ritual drama’ played out for the consumption of the public.1 These approaches are countered by historian Paweł Machcewicz , who paints a picture of a mass social movement that entered the public stage and contested the existing political order.2 Despite appearances, however, these contrasting approaches do not contradict each other, but rather show the same phenomenon from different angles: they illuminate history either from the top-down or the bottom-up.3 This chapter attempts to understand the changes that resulted from a collision of interests between the state authorities and the grassroots elements of Polish society. It presents the rejection by the veterans’ and former prisoners’ groups of the ideological formulae of the Stalinist years, and the reaction of the authorities in creating a new legitimizing narrative: the myth of the unity of the resistance movement, which utilized parts of the myth of victory over fascism but also rearranged the hierarchy of wartime narratives. Unlike its Stalinist predecessor, the new myth was inclusivist, but in stipulating the unity of diverse groups and interests, it also falsifi ed the history of the war. De-Stalinization arrived in Poland quickly, thanks to a rapidly unfolding chain of events: the USSR ’s change in direction under Nikita Khrushchev , whose ‘Secret Speech’ about the crimes of Stalinism (February 1956 ) was widely distributed in Warsaw ; the death of Bolesław Bierut (March 1956); the outbreak of the workers’ protests in Poznań (June 1956); and fi nally, the election of Władysław Gomułka as the First Secretary of the Party (October 1956) at a moment when the uprising in 1 Witold Jedlicki, Klub Krzywego Koła, Warszawa 1963; Jadwiga Staniszkis, Poland’s Self- Limiting Revolution, Princeton 1984, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Moskiewskie Korzenie Komunistycznej Elity Władzy W Polsce
    Wrocławskie Studia Wschodnie 21 (2017) Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego Mirosław szuMiło Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie, Instytut Pamięci Narodowej Moskiewskie korzenie komunistycznej elity władzy w Polsce W powszechnej świadomości funkcjonuje słuszne przekonanie, że władza ko- munistyczna została przywieziona do Polski na sowieckich bagnetach. W niniej- szym tekście chciałbym przyjrzeć się owym moskiewskim korzeniom elity komunistycznej sprawującej władzę w tzw. Polsce Ludowej. Spróbuję okre- ślić formy i metody kształtowania przyszłych kadr rządzących naszym krajem przez Komintern (Międzynarodówkę Komunistyczną) i NKWD oraz rzeczy- wisty (ilościowy i jakościowy) udział tych ludzi w powojennej elicie władzy. Pod pojęciem „elita władzy” rozumiem elitę rzeczywistą PPR i PZPR, do której oprócz członków kierownictwa partii (Biura Politycznego i Sekretariatu KC) należy zaliczyć osoby zajmujące najwyższe stanowiska kierownicze w róż- nych segmentach aparatu władzy na szczeblu centralnym: kierowników wydzia- łów KC PPR/PZPR, członków Rady Ministrów i Prezydium KRN, a od 1947 r. Rady Państwa, wiceministrów i dyrektorów departamentów w Ministerstwie Bezpieczeństwa Publicznego, a później MSW, oraz członków tzw. Zespołu Partyjnego MON. Ponadto uwzględniam I sekretarzy komitetów wojewódzkich PPR/PZPR jako najważniejsze osoby na poziomie województwa. W powojennej elicie władzy zdecydowanie przeważali dawni członkowie Komunistycznej Partii Polski (KPP) lub Komunistycznego Związku Mło- dzieży Polski (KZMP). W latach 1944–1948 przedwojenni komuniści, tzw. kapepowcy, stanowili 90% elity PPR1. Działaczom komunistycznym w II Rzeczypospolitej przez cały czas przyświecała myśl o zwycięstwie rewo- lucji i objęciu władzy w Polskiej Republice Rad. Ich sowieccy protektorzy starali się przygotowywać odpowiednie, z punktu widzenia Moskwy, kadry polskich komunistów. Podstawową formą selekcji było prawdopodobnie 1 Dokładna analiza elity PPR zob. M. Szumiło, Elita Polskiej Partii Robotniczej (1944– 1948).
    [Show full text]
  • Service of Certified Lieutenant Colonel Marian Morawski (1892-1945)
    “NOT ONLY FLOWING WITH MILK AND HONEY...” SERVICE OF CERTIFIED LIEUTENANT COLONEL MARIAN MORAWSKI (1892–1945) IN THE ARMY OF THE SECOND REPUBLIC. AN OUTLINE OF A BIOGRAPHY Marek Stefański University of Lodz, Institute of History ORCID ID: 0000-0003-3159-5409 The Republic of Poland, which was reborn in 1918, had to deal with many external and internal problems. Strenuous work on the recon- struction of statehood was carried out both in political cabinets and on the fronts of wars over state borders. However, the fight with the neighbours would not have been possible without the army, and there- fore the Polish forces was reborn in parallel with statehood. In its ranks there were many soldiers for whom the Motherland was the most im- portant. However, the army is not only privateers, but also officers who often spent the period of World War I in the partitioning armies, and who joined the Polish Army in 1918 and served in it in the following years. Over time, many of them have been forgotten or their names appear occasionally when discussing other topics. In my text, I would like to recall and outline the biography of one of the officers of the Second Polish Republic, certified Lieutenant Colonel (podpułkownik dyplomowany) Marian Morawski. Marian Morawski was born on March 25, 1892 in Pruszków as the son of Władysław and Rozalia née Bartoszewicz.1 Marian Morawski in the documents collected in the personal file stated that his father was a mechanic in railway workshops in Żbików. This information is some- 1 CAW WBH, Marian Morawski, ap.
    [Show full text]
  • Herstory Revisionism
    BALTIC WORLDSBALTIC A scholarly journal and news magazine. December 2017. Vol. X:4. Personal diaries on From the Centre for Baltic and East European Studies (CBEES), Södertörn University. the Russian Revolution December Vol. 2017. X:4 BALTIC WORLDSbalticworlds.com Herstory Revisionism Herstory Revisionism. Revisionism. Herstory • National heroines Writings and the “herstorical turn” and views • Gendered remembrance of political upheavals Women’s participation in political upheavals political in participation Women’s on women • Narratives of norm- warriors breaking women also in this issue Illustration: Karin Sunvisson UKRAINIAN WORRIES / AVANT-GARDE ART / ORIENTAL “OTHER” / NEGOTIATING NORD STREAM / NUCLEAR LEGACY Sponsored by the Foundation BALTIC2 for Baltic and East European Studies contents 3 colophon Baltic Worlds is published by WORLDSbalticworlds.com the Centre for Baltic and East European Studies (CBEES) at Södertörn University, Sweden. Editor-in-chief Ninna Mörner editorial in this issue Publisher Joakim Ekman Scholarly advisory council Thomas Andrén, Södertörn History, herstory and other stories … University; Sari Autio-Sarasmo, Aleksanteri Institute, Helsinki n this issue of Baltic Worlds, we present presented as custodians of the na- Universiy; Sofie Bedford, IRES, a selection of diary entries from 1917 in tion, or — in the opposite image — as theme Uppsala University; Michael Russia, the year of the Revolution. It is a enlightened, independent women interview Gentile, Oslo University; Markus 4 Anti-genderism. Feminism in fascinating read, with depictions of a tu- who leave family, country, and ide- Huss (chair), Stockholm University; Poland, Eva Karlberg Herstory Revisionism. Imultuous, epochal event, recorded by men and ology in order to shatter the exist- Katarina Leppänen, University of Women’s participation women known and unknown, revolutionaries ing order, associating danger with peer-reviewed in political upheavals Gothenburg; Thomas Lundén, and their detractors; with everything from ob- emancipation.
    [Show full text]
  • “Not Only Flowing with Milk and Honey...”
    “NOT ONLY FLOWING WITH MILK AND HONEY...” SERVICE OF CERTIFIED LIEUTENANT COLONEL MARIAN MORAWSKI (1892–1945) IN THE ARMY OF THE SECOND REPUBLIC. AN OUTLINE OF A BIOGRAPHY Marek Stefański University of Lodz, Institute of History ORCID ID: 0000-0003-3159-5409 The Republic of Poland, which was reborn in 1918, had to deal with many external and internal problems. Strenuous work on the recon- struction of statehood was carried out both in political cabinets and on the fronts of wars over state borders. However, the fight with the neighbours would not have been possible without the army, and there- fore the Polish forces was reborn in parallel with statehood. In its ranks there were many soldiers for whom the Motherland was the most im- portant. However, the army is not only privateers, but also officers who often spent the period of World War I in the partitioning armies, and who joined the Polish Army in 1918 and served in it in the following years. Over time, many of them have been forgotten or their names appear occasionally when discussing other topics. In my text, I would like to recall and outline the biography of one of the officers of the Second Polish Republic, certified Lieutenant Colonel (podpułkownik dyplomowany) Marian Morawski. Marian Morawski was born on March 25, 1892 in Pruszków as the son of Władysław and Rozalia née Bartoszewicz.1 Marian Morawski in the documents collected in the personal file stated that his father was a mechanic in railway workshops in Żbików. This information is some- 1 CAW WBH, Marian Morawski, ap.
    [Show full text]
  • Generate PDF of This Page
    Institute of National Remembrance https://ipn.gov.pl/en/news/1477,European-Arrest-Warrant-for-Stefan-Michnik-a-former-judge-of-the-Mil itary-Distri.html 2021-09-30, 11:03 08.11.2018 European Arrest Warrant for Stefan Michnik, a former judge of the Military District Court in Warsaw The Branch Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation in Warsaw is conducting an investigation against Stefan Michnik, a former judge of the Military District Court in Warsaw. He is suspected of committing thirty crimes constituting communist crimes, falling within the scope of crimes against humanity, which involved issuing unlawful sentences adjudicating capital punishment and imprisonment for persons working towards sovereignty of the Polish State. The suspected crimes were perpetrated in the years 1952- 1953 in Warsaw. In the course of the proceedings evidence material was gathered that gave grounds for assuming that judge Stefan Michnik compromised the principle of objectivity, and when ruling in criminal matters he was primarily guided by ideological premises, seeking physical elimination of people perceived by the former authorities as political opponents. His assessment of evidence was discretionary, without any objective evidence against the defendants, and thus he unjustifiably imputed alleged acts to them. Moreover, when forming the punishment, he adopted a principle that the defendants "are highly dangerous for the rest of the society", not taking into account any circumstances in their favour (young age, no previous criminal record, repentance). Stefan Michnik, among others, presided over a body of judges of the Military District Court in Warsaw, which in 5 January 1953 passed a death sentence on the activist of the independence organization "Kraj".
    [Show full text]
  • Trzy Twarze Jozefa Swiatly.Pdf
    r»*rwa ff v hw m f - u »» i p(l •:• < yucww«<w4t»punmm m TJCłftUii^SMWMlWjyi I m # p < B r » * ; ~ fste^wyurtwwcmiiUl mm Z556013 y wiu«!4Ciiwi4wrw ra»>«w TVARZK :I i JÓZBFA ŚWIATLI # • •* % ¥ *»'» -V^ Przyczynek do historii komunizmu w Polsce , V •|P>4M r ♦ ** 4 ,> V E q 2 / l o o f ¿ o & j 3 9 , S o Copyright © Andrzej Paczkowski, 2009 Projekt okładki Sylwia Tomkiewicz Redaktor prowadzący Dorota Górecka Redakcja Agnieszka Ogrodowczyk Korekta Anna Gabryś Redakcja techniczna Elżbieta Urbańska « 5 6 0 1 3 Maciej Trzebiecki ISBN 978-83-89325-87-7 Warszawa 2009 Wydawca Prószyński Media Sp. z o.o. 02-651 Warszawa, ul. Garażowa 7 Druk i oprawa Drukarnia Wydawnicza im. W.L. Anczyca S.A. 30-011 Kraków, ul. Wrocławska 53 Spis rzeczy WSTĘP______________________________________________ 7 Część I: IZAK FLEISCHFARB Od Medynia do K rakow a______________________________ 21 Kraków i komunizm __________________________________ 28 Fryda, rodzina i wojsko_______________________________ 42 Wojsko i kampania wrześniowa_________________________ 47 Zsyłka i Dżambuł_____________________________________ 55 Wojna: „kościuszkowiec”_______________________________ 64 * Część II: JÓZEF ŚWIATŁO: ZBRODNIA Pom agier___________________________________________ 73 W tere n ie ___________________________________________ 87 Na tropach wroga wewnętrznego: początki______________ 106 Biuro Specjalne______________________________________ 134 X Departament______________________________________ 147 Część III: JÓZEF ŚWIATŁO: DEMASKACJAI DESTRUKCJA Ucieczka____________________________________________
    [Show full text]