DOCSLIB.ORG

11. Energy Targets

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
11. Energy Targets Energy Targets General overview © IRENA 2014 1 Outline • Definition • Basic requirements for clear targets • Target definition: Capacity vs Generation vs TFEC • Energy targets (Energy balance). • Internationally agreed targets and indicators (SDG7) 2 Renewable Energy Targets Definition • “Numerical goals established by governments to achieve a specific amount of renewable energy production or consumption. They can apply to the electricity, heating/cooling or transport sectors, or to the energy sector as a whole. They often include a specific time period or date by which the target is to be reached”. Source: IRENA (2015), Renewable Energy Target Setting. Basic requirements for clear targets ✓ Definition: Fixed amount or percentage ✓ Over: Electricity -Capacity, generation, Energy balance: TFEC, TPES ✓ End use: Power, transport, heating and cooling, among others. ✓ Technology: Neutral or specific ✓ Baseline year and amount: (Same units as target) ✓ Target year ✓ Binding character 4 Share (%) or Fixed amount (GW, • Can be defined as a share: e.g GWh) Saint Lucia’s 2016 NETS established a target of 35% renewable electricity consumption by 2020 • Can be defined as a capacity Total primary energy supply (TPES) value: e.g The Framework for vs. Total final energy consumption the Development of a (TFEC) Renewable Energy Policy for Trinidad and Tobago sets a target of 60 MW of renewable energy capacity by 2020 Global TFEC by sectors It is important to acknowledge the relevance of each sector at national level, when formulating targets. Source: REN21 Global Status Report 2018, Based on IEA, World Energy Balances and Statistics 6 Targets according to the binding character Source: IRENA (2015), Renewable Energy Target Setting. 7 Target definition: Capacity vs Generation vs TFEC Capacity vs Generation vs TFEC 2016 RE shares (global): • 30.7% capacity • 23.7% generation • 17.5% TFEC. 8 Capacity factor • Capacity and generation are two different measures, the capacity factor CP relates them as follows: 퐴푐푡푢푎푙 푒푛푒푟푎푡표푛 (퐺푊ℎ) 퐶푃 = 퐶푎푝푎푐푡푦 퐺푊 ∗ 8760 • Reference: 1 Year =8760 hours • Actual electricity generation vs maximum electricity generation. 9 Global capacity factors Global Capacity Factors Technology 2011 2014 2017 Geothermal 78.96% 78.97% 77.28% Nuclear 76.20% 75.50% 75.10% Biogas 53.77% 61.22% 58.29% Solid biofuels 54.26% 55.71% 50.18% Fossil fuels 49.20% 47.00% 45.70% Renewable hydropower 41.88% 41.85% 39.94% Wind 22.44% 23.28% 25.16% Liquid biofuels 21.88% 30.02% 21.01% Solar photovoltaic 9.89% 12.24% 12.68% 10 Energy targets (energy balance) • Share of renewables calculated from TFEC row • Energy intensity from TPES row and GDP • Renewable share should include electricity (if applicable) ORIGINAL ENERGY BALANCE Energy Balance Oil Wood fuel Solar PV Wind Electricity Total Electricity (TJ) (TJ) (TJ) (TJ) (TJ) (TJ) (MWh) Production 1,210 1,210 Imports 1,000 1,000 Exports Total Primary Energy Supply (TPES) 1,000 1,210 2,210 Electricity plants -550 180 -370 50,000 Own use -5 -5 1,400 Distribution losses -13 -13 3,600 Total Final Energy Consumption (TFEC) 450 1,210 162 1,822 45,000 Industry 50 400 54 504 15,000 Transport 300 300 Commercial and public 200 54 254 15,000 Residential 100 600 54 754 15,000 Other 10 10 Note: all figures are positive unless the minus sign is shown RE share of TFEC = 1,210/1,822 = 66% Primary energy intensity = 2,210/500 = 4.42 MJ/USD (Assume GDP = USD 500 million) 11 Energy targets: generation example • 5MW of PV: renewable share increases due to addition of RE electricity consumption (based on its share of generation) • TPES (efficiency) also changes, from switch to renewables ENERGY BALANCE WITH 5MW SOLAR PV Energy Balance (Generating 7,000 MWh/year) Oil Wood fuel Solar PV Wind Electricity Total Electricity (TJ) (TJ) (TJ) (TJ) (TJ) (TJ) (MWh) Production 1,210 25 1,235 Imports 923 923 Exports Total Primary Energy Supply (TPES) 923 1,210 25 2,158 Electricity plants (fossil) -473 155 -318 43,000 Electricity plants (renewable) -25 25 0 7,000 Own use -5 -5 1,400 Distribution losses -13 -13 3,600 Total Final Energy Consumption (TFEC) 450 1,210 162 1,822 45,000 Industry 50 400 54 504 15,000 Transport 300 300 Commercial and public 200 54 254 15,000 Residential 100 600 54 754 15,000 Other 10 10 Note: all figures are positive unless the minus sign is shown RE share of TFEC = (1,210+(25/180*162))/1,822 = 68% Primary energy intensity = 2,158/500 = 4.32 MJ/USD 12 (Assume GDP = USD 500 million) Interlinkages between datasets Energy statistics are at the centre of analysis of targets, NDCs, other development goals and investment plans NDCs Energy policies and targets Finance GHG Emissions Electricity Electricity Capital Investment CUF emissions factors generation capacity cost data needs ENERGY STATISTICS Other benefits: Other benefits: - Energy security - Local income - Import substitution - Local employment - Electricity access - Electricity quality Which comes first: the targets - Economic development - Environmental impacts or the list of projects? Internationally agreed targets and indicators (SDG7) Target 7.1: Ensure universal access to affordable, reliable and modern energy services. Target 7.2: Increase substantially the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix. Target 7.3: Double the global rate of improvement in energy efficiency. Target 7.a: Enhance international cooperation to facilitate access to clean energy. (IRENA/OECD) Target 7.b: Expand infrastructure and upgrade technology for supplying modern and sustainable energy services for all in developing countries. 14 SDG indicators • Access indicators: ▪ 7.1.1: Percentage of population with access to electricity. ▪ 7.1.2: Proportion of population with primary reliance on clean fuels and technology. (Fuel used for cooking and/or heating) • Renewable Energy indicator: ▪ 7.2.1: Renewable energy share of total final energy consumption. (RE Final Energy Consumption divided by TFEC) • Efficiency indicator: ▪ 7.3.1: Energy intensity measured in terms of total energy supply and GDP. (Total Primary Energy Supply [TPES] per million USD of GDP measured at Purchasing Power Parity [PPP]) ▪ 7.A.1: International financial flows to developing countries in support of clean energy research and development and renewable energy production, including in hybrid systems. 15 16 17 Questions? Thank you!.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U.S. Energy in the 21St Century: a Primer
    U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46723 SUMMARY R46723 U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Since the start of the 21st century, the U.S. energy system has changed tremendously. Technological advances in energy production have driven changes in energy consumption, and Melissa N. Diaz, the United States has moved from being a net importer of most forms of energy to a declining Coordinator importer—and a net exporter in 2019. The United States remains the second largest producer and Analyst in Energy Policy consumer of energy in the world, behind China. Overall energy consumption in the United States has held relatively steady since 2000, while the mix of energy sources has changed. Between 2000 and 2019, consumption of natural gas and renewable energy increased, while oil and nuclear power were relatively flat and coal decreased. In the same period, production of oil, natural gas, and renewables increased, while nuclear power was relatively flat and coal decreased. Overall energy production increased by 42% over the same period. Increases in the production of oil and natural gas are due in part to technological improvements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling that have facilitated access to resources in unconventional formations (e.g., shale). U.S. oil production (including natural gas liquids and crude oil) and natural gas production hit record highs in 2019. The United States is the largest producer of natural gas, a net exporter, and the largest consumer. Oil, natural gas, and other liquid fuels depend on a network of over three million miles of pipeline infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Energy Use and Environmental Effects of Electric Vehicles
    Article Primary Energy Use and Environmental Effects of Electric Vehicles Efstathios E. Michaelides Department of Engineering, TCU, Fort Worth, TX 76132, USA; [email protected] Abstract: The global market of electric vehicles has become one of the prime growth industries of the 21st century fueled by marketing efforts, which frequently assert that electric vehicles are “very efficient” and “produce no pollution.” This article uses thermodynamic analysis to determine the primary energy needs for the propulsion of electric vehicles and applies the energy/exergy trade-offs between hydrocarbons and electricity propulsion of road vehicles. The well-to-wheels efficiency of electric vehicles is comparable to that of vehicles with internal combustion engines. Heat transfer to or from the cabin of the vehicle is calculated to determine the additional energy for heating and air-conditioning needs, which must be supplied by the battery, and the reduction of the range of the vehicle. The article also determines the advantages of using fleets of electric vehicles to offset the problems of the “duck curve” that are caused by the higher utilization of wind and solar energy sources. The effects of the substitution of internal combustion road vehicles with electric vehicles on carbon dioxide emission avoidance are also examined for several national electricity grids. It is determined that grids, which use a high fraction of coal as their primary energy source, will actually increase the carbon dioxide emissions; while grids that use a high fraction of renewables and nuclear energy will significantly decrease their carbon dioxide emissions. Globally, the carbon dioxide emissions will decrease by approximately 16% with the introduction of electric vehicles.
    [Show full text]
  • Printer Tech Tips—Cause & Effects of Static Electricity in Paper
    Printer Tech Tips Cause & Effects of Static Electricity in Paper Problem The paper has developed a static electrical charge causing an abnormal sheet-to- sheet or sheet-to-material attraction which is difficult to separate. This condition may result in feeder trip-offs, print voids from surface contamination, ink offset, Sappi Printer Technical Service or poor sheet jog in the delivery. 877 SappiHelp (727 7443) Description Static electricity is defined as a non-moving, non-flowing electrical charge or in simple terms, electricity at rest. Static electricity becomes visible and dynamic during the brief moment it sparks a discharge and for that instant it’s no longer at rest. Lightning is the result of static discharge as is the shock you receive just before contacting a grounded object during unusually dry weather. Matter is composed of atoms, which in turn are composed of protons, neutrons, and electrons. The number of protons and neutrons, which make up the atoms nucleus, determine the type of material. Electrons orbit the nucleus and balance the electrical charge of the protons. When both negative and positive are equal, the charge of the balanced atom is neutral. If electrons are removed or added to this configuration, the overall charge becomes either negative or positive resulting in an unbalanced atom. Materials with high conductivity, such as steel, are called conductors and maintain neutrality because their electrons can move freely from atom to atom to balance any applied charges. Therefore, conductors can dissipate static when properly grounded. Non-conductive materials, or insulators such as plastic and wood, have the opposite property as their electrons can not move freely to maintain balance.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 2030 a Forward Looking Primary Energy Factor for A
    A forward looking Primary Energy Factor for a greener European Future What is the Primary Energy Factor and why does it exist? The Primary Energy Factor (PEF) connects primary and final energy. It indicates how much primary energy is used to generate a unit of electricity or a unit of useable thermal energy. It allows for comparison between the primary energy consumption of products with the same functionality (e.g. heating) using different energy carriers (particularly electricity vs. fossil fuels). Electricity is a final energy carrier, produced from different primary energy sources like fossil fuels (gas, coal), nuclear and renewables (hydro, wind, solar). Currently a PEF of 2.5 is used as a “conversion factor" to express electricity consumption/savings in primary energy consumption/savings, regardless of the type of energy source used to produce it (also when the electricity comes from renewables). The current conversion factor implies that 1 unit of electricity requires an input of 2.5 units of primary energy. This assumes all power generation in the EU to have a 40% efficiency (100 / 2.5 = 40) – even non-dispatchable renewables from which energy is harnessed without the combustion of fuel. A PEF of 2.5 is too high and does not reflect the reality of power generation. The need to update the PEF to 2.0 The Commission has decided to review the PEF value and methodology in the Energy Efficiency Directive to better reflect the EU energy mix, in particular today’s share of renewable energy in electricity generation and its strong increase in the near future .
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study Report: Energiewende – Mission-Oriented R&I Policies
    Mission-oriented R&I policies: In-depth case studies Case Study Report Energiewende Hanna Kuittinen, Daniela Velte January 2018 Mission-oriented R&I policies: In-depth case studies European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Directorate A – Policy Development and coordination Unit A6 – Open Data Policy and Science Cloud Contact Arnold Weiszenbacher E-mail [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels Manuscript completed in January 2018. This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the internet (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 PDF ISBN 978-92-79-80159-4 doi: 10.2777/835267 KI-01-18-150-EN-N © European Union, 2018. Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the EU copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders EUROPEAN COMMISSION Mission-oriented R&I policies: In-depth case studies Case Study Report: Energiewende Hanna Kuittinen Daniela Velte 2018 Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Table of Contents 1 Summary of the case study ................................................................................... 3 2 Context and objectives of the initiative ................................................................... 5 2.1 Origins of initiative and the main contextual factors ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Best Energy Mix and the Need for Comprehensive Viewpoints
    IEEJ: April 2013 All Right Reserved The Best Energy Mix and the Need for Comprehensive Viewpoints Wednesday, November 16, 2011 Masakazu Toyoda The Institute of Energy Economics, Japan IEEJ: April 2013 All Right Reserved Contents 1. The Best Energy Mix from Comprehensive Viewpoints 2. Overall, There Is No Perfect Energy Option 3. Short- to Mid-Term Challenges to Achieving the Best Energy Mix 4. Mid- to Long-Term Challenges to Achieving the Best Energy Mix Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited. 2 IEEJ: April 2013 All Right Reserved 1. The Best Energy Mix from Comprehensive Viewpoints 1. When reviewing the energy mix, we must solve simultaneous equations with many variables. This requires objective and quantitative analyses. 2. The following variables are important: 1) S (safety) 2) Three Es (i) Energy security (ii) Economic efficiency (particularly in terms of cost) (iii) The environment (compatibility with mitigating global warming) 3) M (impacts on the macro economy) Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited. 3 IEEJ: April 2013 All Right Reserved 1. The Best Energy Mix from Comprehensive Viewpoints 1) S (safety) ● Safety is a prerequisite for energy policies and the activities of the energy industry itself. ● Safety is a measure of the overall competence in various areas including technology, appropriate regulatory framework, cooperation among national and local governments, and the allocation of responsibility among the national government, local governments and utilities. ● Since other energy options also have their advantages and disadvantages (in terms of supply stability, economic efficiency, global warming mitigation, etc.), completely phasing out nuclear power would incur significant risk. Japan must develop safer nuclear power, which is supported by people.
    [Show full text]
  • Electricity Production by Fuel
    EN27 Electricity production by fuel Key message Fossil fuels and nuclear energy continue to dominate the fuel mix for electricity production despite their risk of environmental impact. This impact was reduced during the 1990s with relatively clean natural gas becoming the main choice of fuel for new plants, at the expense of oil, in particular. Production from coal and lignite has increased slightly in recent years but its share of electricity produced has been constant since 2000 as overall production increases. The steep increase in overall electricity production has also counteracted some of the environmental benefits from fuel switching. Rationale The trend in electricity production by fuel provides a broad indication of the impacts associated with electricity production. The type and extent of the related environmental pressures depends upon the type and amount of fuels used for electricity generation as well as the use of abatement technologies. Fig. 1: Gross electricity production by fuel, EU-25 5,000 4,500 4,000 Other fuels 3,500 Renewables 1.4% 3,000 13.7% Nuclear 2,500 TWh Natural and derived 31.0% gas 2,000 Coal and lignite 1,500 19.9% Oil 1,000 29.5% 500 4.5% 0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2010 2020 2030 Data Source: Eurostat (Historic data), Primes Energy Model (European Commission 2006) for projections. Note: Data shown are for gross electricity production and include electricity production from both public and auto-producers. Renewables includes electricity produced from hydro (excluding pumping), biomass, municipal waste, geothermal, wind and solar PV.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydroelectric Power -- What Is It? It=S a Form of Energy … a Renewable Resource
    INTRODUCTION Hydroelectric Power -- what is it? It=s a form of energy … a renewable resource. Hydropower provides about 96 percent of the renewable energy in the United States. Other renewable resources include geothermal, wave power, tidal power, wind power, and solar power. Hydroelectric powerplants do not use up resources to create electricity nor do they pollute the air, land, or water, as other powerplants may. Hydroelectric power has played an important part in the development of this Nation's electric power industry. Both small and large hydroelectric power developments were instrumental in the early expansion of the electric power industry. Hydroelectric power comes from flowing water … winter and spring runoff from mountain streams and clear lakes. Water, when it is falling by the force of gravity, can be used to turn turbines and generators that produce electricity. Hydroelectric power is important to our Nation. Growing populations and modern technologies require vast amounts of electricity for creating, building, and expanding. In the 1920's, hydroelectric plants supplied as much as 40 percent of the electric energy produced. Although the amount of energy produced by this means has steadily increased, the amount produced by other types of powerplants has increased at a faster rate and hydroelectric power presently supplies about 10 percent of the electrical generating capacity of the United States. Hydropower is an essential contributor in the national power grid because of its ability to respond quickly to rapidly varying loads or system disturbances, which base load plants with steam systems powered by combustion or nuclear processes cannot accommodate. Reclamation=s 58 powerplants throughout the Western United States produce an average of 42 billion kWh (kilowatt-hours) per year, enough to meet the residential needs of more than 14 million people.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Energy Consumption by Fuel, EU-27
    EN26 Total Primary Energy Consumption by Fuel Key message Fossil fuels continue to dominate total energy consumption, but environmental pressures have been reduced, partly due to a significant switch from coal and lignite to relatively cleaner natural gas in the 1990s. The share of renewable energy sources remains small despite an increase in absolute terms. Overall, total primary energy consumption increased by an average of 0.6 % per annum during the period 1990-2005 (9.8 % overall) thus counteracting some of the environmental benefits from fuel switching. Rationale The indicator provides an indication of the environmental pressures originating from energy consumption. The environmental impacts such as resource depletion, greenhouse gas emissions, air pollutant emissions and radioactive waste generation strongly depend on the type and amount of fuel consumed. Fig. 1: Total energy consumption by fuel, EU-27 1800 1600 1400 1200 Renewables Nuclear 1000 Coal and lignite Gas 800 Oil 600 400 Million tonnes of oil equivalents 200 0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Data source: EEA, Eurostat (historic data) 1. Indicator assessment Total primary energy consumption in the EU-27 increased by 9.8 % between 1990 and 2005. Over the same period, the share of fossil fuels, including coal, lignite, oil and natural gas, in primary energy consumption declined slightly from 83 % in 1990 to 79.0 % in 2005, although fossil fuel consumption increased in absolute terms (by more than 4 %). The use of fossil fuels has considerable impact on the environment and is the main cause of greenhouse gas emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Electricity Payment Program a Budget-Based Alternative to a Federal Clean Electricity Standard
    Clean Electricity Payment Program A budget-based alternative to a federal Clean Electricity Standard August 2021 Clean energy legislation this year is critical to jumpstart investments in the full set of clean energy solutions required to meet ambitious climate goals. One approach used widely at the state level—a Clean Energy Standard—requires electricity suppliers to use clean energy to meet a growing share of the electricity delivered to their customers. Senator Tina Smith (D-MN) is promoting an alternative approach, the Clean Electricity Payment Program, that relies on incentives to scale-up clean energy investments. What is the Clean Electricity Payment Program (CEPP)? The CEPP is a budget-based alternative to a traditional Clean Electricity Standard (CES) that is designed for passage via the Budget Reconciliation process. It works by providing federal investments and financial incentives to suppliers that deliver electricity directly to retail consumers to supply more clean electricity each year. It is not a regulatory mechanism and does not create a binding mandate. What are the goals of the program? The CEPP is part of an overall package of incentives in the climate portion of the proposed reconciliation package that collectively aims to achieve an 80% nationwide average clean electricity goal by 2030. The CEPP does not require each electricity supplier to achieve this goal. Recognizing that each supplier has a different starting point, the CEPP provides incentives for all suppliers to increase their total clean electricity share each year at an equitable pace. Electricity suppliers that start below the national average are not expected to catch up, and those already meeting very high shares are assigned a smaller annual increase.
    [Show full text]
  • California's Energy Future
    California’s Energy Future: The View to 2050 Summary Report May 2011 Jane C. S. Long (co-chair) LEGAL NOTICE This report was prepared pursuant to a contract between the California Energy Commission (CEC) and the California Council on Science and Technology (CCST). It does not represent the views of the CEC, its employees, or the State of California. The CEC, the State of California, its employees, contractors, and subcontractors make no warranty, express or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this report; nor does any party represent that the use of this information will not infringe upon privately owned rights. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would also like to thank the Stephen Bechtel Fund and the California Energy Commision for their contributions to the underwriting of this project. We would also like to thank the California Air Resources Board for their continued support and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for underwriting the leadership of this effort. COPYRIGHT Copyright 2011 by the California Council on Science and Technology. Library of Congress Cataloging Number in Publications Data Main Entry Under Title: California’s Energy Future: A View to 2050 May 2011 ISBN-13: 978-1-930117-44-0 Note: The California Council on Science and Technology (CCST) has made every reasonable effort to assure the accuracy of the information in this publication. However, the contents of this publication are subject to changes, omissions, and errors, and CCST does not accept responsibility for any inaccuracies that may occur. CCST is a non-profit organization established in 1988 at the request of the California State Government and sponsored by the major public and private postsecondary institutions of California and affiliate federal laboratories in conjunction with leading private-sector firms.
    [Show full text]
  • T O M O R R O W 2 0
    2015 TOMORROW Table of Contents The American Petroleum Institute Our Energy Tomorrow .............................................................. 2 Jack Gerard, The American Petroleum Institute The American Petroleum Institute (API) is a America’s Petroleum Renaissance ................................................... 5 national trade association that represents The American Petroleum Institute all segments of America’s innovation-driven oil and natural gas industry. Its more than Nuclear Energy Reliably Powers America ............................................. 9 The Nuclear Energy Institute 600 members — including large integrated companies, exploration and production, Hydropower | A Wave of Potential for a Renewable Energy Future ...................... 13 refining, marketing, pipeline, marine shipping The National Hydropower Association and support businesses, and service and Solar Energy in America Shines Bright .............................................. 17 supply firms — provide most of the nation’s The Solar Energy Industries Association energy and are backed by a growing Geothermal Power | Renewable Energy from the Earth’s Warmth ...................... 21 grassroots movement of more than 27 million The Geothermal Energy Association Americans. The industry also supports 9.8 million U.S. jobs and 8 percent of the U.S. Special Section | Infrastructure — The Essential Link to a Secure Energy Future ........ 25 economy, delivers $85 million a day in Natural Gas | America’s Abundant, Clean Energy ..................................... 29 revenue to our government1 and, since The American Petroleum Institute 2000, has invested more than $3 trillion The Attributes of Wind Energy are Adding Up ........................................ 33 in U.S. capital projects to advance all The American Wind Energy Association 2 forms of energy. Electricity from Coal is a Vital, But Threatened, Energy Source ......................... 37 The American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity Biomass Power | Ready, Proven and Cost-Effective Energy ...........................
    [Show full text]