DOCSLIB.ORG

EMS P- *Treaties: Tribes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EMS P- *Treaties: Tribes DOCUMENT RESUME 310 175 612 RC 011 603 TITLE Beyond Bows and Arrows. Resource Manual. INSTITUTION Civil Service Commission, Washington, D. C. Bureau of Intergovernaental Personaal Programs. PUB DATE Nay 79 NOTE 148p.; Prepared for the Dallas Region "Symposium on the American Indian" EMS P- E OF01 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIL 1S American History: *American Indian Culture: American Indian Education: *American Indians: Civil Rights: Education: Employment: Federal Government: *Federal Indian Relationship: *Government Role: Health: Housing: Population Trends: Reservations (Indian): *Treaties: Tribes IDENTIFIMIS *American Irlian History: Bureau of Indian Affairs: Cultural Contributions ABSTRACT In spite of their visible prominence and influence on almost emery aspect of our society, Aserican Indians remain theleast understood group of people. To acquaint symposium participantswith the American Indian and to produce greater understanding,this resource manual docuaents the historical treatmentand present status of Indians. Presented are: the constitutional status ofAmerican Indians, including soarces of federal power, tribalsovereignty, , powers of tribal self-government, hunting andfishing rights, domestic relations, taxation, legal statas of Indian individuals, constitutional immunity, the 1968 Indian Bill of Rights, rights and privileges of state citizenship, and wardship:American Indian tribes, Eskimo and Aleut groups for which the Bureau of Indian Affairs has responsibility: federal Indian policiesfrom the colonial period through the early 19701s: administrators of U.S. Federal Indian Policy: Cosmissioners of Indian Affairs from 1832 tothe present: important dates in federal Indian relationships:labor statistics: employment: education: health: relevance of Indianlife %* civilisation: housing: Indian population byregions: location of Adian lands and communities: and Indian tribes andorganization, including names and addresses of each leader. MCI *********************************************************************** * ,* Reproductions supplied by BURS are the best that can be.made * from the original locument. * *********************************************************************** - o . - a + . *. --monimmonwei.ok, IIININNIRMIIN11Www =.11 ilti.11.: t rbr. , U I DEPARTMENT OP NINON. EDUCATION A WELPARIE NATIONAL. INSTITUTE Of EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO- DUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM 02 .THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGIN- ATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS CO STATED DO NOT NECtSSARILY REPRE- SENT OF F ICIAL NATIONAL INSTITUTE Of 40 EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY - 1111.11 Cover: Will Sampson, Jr./ProfessionalActor Cover Design: Jack Crittenden/Artist Agency: Typography Plus Layout: DoranneMcLeMore/Designer 3 The, Intergovernmental Personnel Programs Division and the Personnel Management Training Institute Present "BEYOND BOWS AND ARROWS" Introduction Dear Participant, every month? What is it likeextended to Mr. Tony Gutierre- being an Indian ?. or can you Director, Personnel Management The Dallas Region say something in Indian? Institute, and his staff for "Symposium,on the American The purpose of the the encouragement and Indian" has been in the Symposium is to provide more cooperation given in the planning stages for at least information to further planning stages and in the last seven months. The acquaint its participants on providing the technical Symposium-was first the American Indian.. As an expertise for getting the mentioned to me over a year example and to answr a work completed. Ms. Jeanne ago during ty initial employ- couple of the above mentioned Bowie, Mr. Jack Crittenden ment orientation by questions, we plan to explain and my wife, Doranne, each Mr. Tony Gutierrez. In all further that nothing can be deserve special acknowledge- probabilitil, the idea has said in Indian and that there ment for their contribution been around within our region is no such thing as feeling to the production of the much longer. Tony and I "Indian". The reason being printed materials. have pursued our initial that "Indian" is a legal term It is my hope that our exchange of information used to refer to several collective efforts will enabling us to sponsor this hundred tribes who, in many benefit each and every Symposium with the ultimate instances, have their own participanf. I hope it will goal of it being an educa- individual language. We produce a greater understand- tional experience for all propose to accomplish our ing between our communities participants. purpose in two ways. First, and will provide us with In almost every aspect of this Resource Manual will something that will be ours today's society, some provide reading materials "as long as waters flow and influence of the American with other sources for more the grass shall grow." Indian remains intact. One study. Secondly, our would not need to look far Symposium speakers are all Sincerely, in any major city to locate from the American Indian a street named after some nQt-Lt_ Communit . They will be tOt 771_ Indian Tribe. The automobile sharing iliformation based on Frank McLemore and aircraft industries have their individual experiences. Coordinator chosen names of Indian Tribes For any event of this to label their products. Themagnitude, a host of people, Intergovernmental Personnel movie industry has been are needed to plan, coordi- Programs Division capitalizing on the American nate and perform other Indian for a long time. If numerous duties. A special one were to initiate a list acknowledgement is given to denotirg the influence of theMr. Edward Vela, Jr., American Indian, it would Regional Director, almost be endless. Yet, in Mr. Orman R. Wright, Chief, spite of the visible promin- Intergovernmental Personnel enqe of the American Indian, Programs Division and we remain the least underv- Mr. Bill Etheridge, Jr., stood group of people. This Director, Regional Training conclusion is based on my Center for the opportunity personal experience of and support given in answering questions like: Do 'sponsoring this Symposium. your folks still livein A special thank you is teepees? Do you receive a pay check from the government Table of Contents UnIted States 114Health Commission on Civil Excerpt From American Rights Indian Policy Review Staff Memorandum Commission Report American Indians and 116Relevance of Indian 11Their Federal Life to Civilization Relationship Plus a partial listing 121 Housing of other U.S. Indian Excerpt From American Groups Indian Policy Review Commission Report 32Federal Indian Policies 126Indian Population by from the Colonial Period Regions through the early 1970's (1970 Census Statistics) Administrators of 130Indian Lands and 56U.S. Federal Indian Communities Policy 131 Indian Tribes/ Commissioners of Organizations 57Indian Affairs Dallas Region VI 1832 to Present 1:35Footnotes 59 Important Dates in Federal Indian 144Memos Relationships Federal Indian Policy 61and Labor Statistics: a review essay Employment 73 Excerpt From American Indian Policy Review Commission Report Education Excerpt From American ,Indian Policy Review Commission Report Health of the American 85 Indian Region VIII Task Force Report United States Commission on Civil Rights Staff Memorandum March 1973 Washington, D.C. 20425 Constitutional Status of American Indians has alternatively viewed Because termination Introduction tribes as sovereign is morally and political entities or as legally unacceptable, anachronisms which because it prqduces A thorough treatment bad practical of the constitutional must eventually be extinguished. The results and because status of American the mere threat of Indians wou2d involve result has been two conflicting Federal termination tends to a complete analysis of discourage greater the unique and compjex policies--separation and assimilation, one self-sufficiency field of Federal among Indian groups, Indian law which designed to protect Indians from the rest I am asking the cannot be adequately Congress to pass a described merely by of society and to leave them with a new concurrent reference to the resolution. which numerous treaties, degree of self- government within would expressly statutory enactments renounce, repudiate of Congress, and court their own institutions, and the other and repeal the decisions or Federal termination policy administrative calculated to bring as expressed by the decisions.1 The legal Indians withill the nainstream of American House Concurrent and political status Resolution 108 of of Indian tribes, the life by terminating relationship of Indians special Federal trust the 83rd Congress. to their tribes and to relationships and This resolution . their States, and the Federal programs and would explicitly relat:.7.1nship of tribes services. Termination affirm the integrity to the States and to reached its aegis and rights to the United States during the Eisenhower continued existence Government haVe long Administration .of the of all Indian tribes been issues of 1950's. The curren and Alaskan Native controversy. Tribes Administration has taken governments, have traditionally a strong stand against recognizing that been viewed by Federal termination; in his cultural pluralism courts as dependent or message on Indian is a source of "tributary" nations affairs, July 13, 1970, national strength. posseised of limited President Nixon said: It would assure elements of these groups that sovereignty and the United States requiring Federal Government would protection.2 Congress continue to carry
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Land Description for Logan's Indian Reserve No. 6 Lower Nicola First
    Land Description For Logan’s Indian Reserve No. 6 Lower Nicola First Nation British Columbia Prepared under First Nations Land Management Act (S.C. 1999, c.24) Prepared on: January 21, 2016 January 21, 2016 Table of Contents Section 1 – Introduction Section 2 – Land Description Section 3 – Administrative Sketch and Orthophoto Map Section 4 – Additional Items Page 2 of 6 January 21, 2016 2 – Land Description Logan’s Indian Reserve No. 6 Land Description of the Extent of Reserve Lands that will be subject to the Land Code of the Lower Nicola First Nation under the First Nations Land Management Act. Reserve Lands within the Kamloops Division of Yale District, Province of British Columbia, Canada, more particularly described as: All of Logan’s Indian Reserve No. 6 as shown on Plan No. 103818 in the Canada Lands Surveys Records (CLSR), containing 18.3 hectares (45.2 acres), more or less. The above described Reserve Lands are subject to: The rights and reservations contained in provincial Order in Council 1938‐1036, registered in the Indian Lands Registry as No. 8042, transferring the land from the Province of British Columbia to Canada, as amended by provincial Order in Council 1969‐1555, registered in the Indian Lands Registry as No. 4111‐118. Notes 1. The Administrative Sketch in Section 3 illustrates this Land Description. 2. Refer to the pertinent survey plans and instruments for the authoritative boundary definition and the nature of the interests in the land. 3. The extent of Oil and Gas Rights are not dealt with in the Land Description.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of Tfje ®Mteb States;
    UBRARY SUPREME court, u. s. In the Supreme Court of tfje ®mteb States; Colorado River Water Conservation ) District, Et Al., ) ) Petitioners, ) ) vP ) ) No. 74-940 United States Of America ) ) Respondent 0 ) 5 Mary Akin, Et Ale, ) ) No. 74-949 Petitioners, ) ) \ va i ) United States Of America, ) ) Respondent . ) ) Washington, D„ C0 January 14, 1976 C- C ' thru 49 ..t: rv_ ty <L_0 ~T~‘ ■ • •. Duplication or copying of this transcript Cx by photographic, electrostatic or other CO \ d 'ry X) facsimile means is prohibited under the 3=» r,HO 3C order form agreement. ocr rnc/> O ) HOOVER REPORTING COMPANY, INC. Official "Reporters Washington, D. C. 546-6666 1 ER IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ■x COLORADO RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, ET AL., Petitioners, v. No. 74-940 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. MARY AKIN, ET AL., Petitioners, v. No. 74-949 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Respondent. s ™ ~ „ --------- -x Washington, D. C. Wednesday, January 14, 1976 The above-entitled matter came on for argument at. 1:48 p.m. BEFOi E % WARREN E. BURGER, Chief Justice of the United States WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR., Associate Justice POTTER STEWART, Associate. Justice BYRON R. WHITE, Associate. Justice THURGOOD MARSHALL, Associate Justice HARRY A. BLACKMUN, Associate Justice LEWIS F. POWELL, JR., Associate Justice WILLIAM H. REENQUIST, Associate Justice JOHN P. STEVENS, Associate Justice 2 APPEARANCESs KENNETH BALCOMB, ESQ., Delaney & Balcomb, P.G. Drawer 790, Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601, for the petitioners» HOWARD E. SHAPIRO, ESQ., Assistant to th© Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D, C. 20530, for fch® respondent» I N D E X ORAL ARGUMENT OF: Page KENNER BALCOMB, ESQ., on behalf of the Petitioners 3 HOWARD E.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Through the Buffalo Grass: a Lakota Story Cycle Paul A
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Paul Johnsgard Collection Papers in the Biological Sciences 2008 Wind Through the Buffalo Grass: A Lakota Story Cycle Paul A. Johnsgard University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/johnsgard Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, Other Languages, Societies, and Cultures Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Johnsgard, Paul A., "Wind Through the Buffalo Grass: A Lakota Story Cycle" (2008). Paul Johnsgard Collection. 51. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/johnsgard/51 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Papers in the Biological Sciences at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Paul Johnsgard Collection by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Fiction I Historical History I Native Ameri("an Wind Through the Buffalo Grass: A Lakota Story Cycle is a narrative history of the Pine Ridge Lakota tribe of South Dakota, following its history from 1850 to the present day through actual historical events and through the stories of four fictional Lakota children, each related by descent and separated from one another by two generations. The ecology of the Pine Ridge region, especially its mammalian and avian wildlife, is woven into the stories of the children. 111ustrated by the author, the book includes drawings of Pine Ridge wildlife, regional maps, and Native American pictorial art. Appendices include a listing of important Lakota words, and checklists of mammals and breeding birds of the region. Dr. Paul A. Johnsgard is foundation professor of biological sciences emeritus of the University of Nebraska-lincoln.
    [Show full text]
  • State Jurisdiction to Tax Indian Reservation Land and Activities Keith E
    Urban Law Annual ; Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law Volume 44 January 1993 State Jurisdiction to Tax Indian Reservation Land and Activities Keith E. Whitson Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_urbanlaw Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Keith E. Whitson, State Jurisdiction to Tax Indian Reservation Land and Activities, 44 Wash. U. J. Urb. & Contemp. L. 099 (1993) Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_urbanlaw/vol44/iss1/4 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Law Annual ; Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STATE JURISDICTION TO TAX INDIAN RESERVATION LAND AND ACTIVITIES I. INTRODUCTION Chief Justice John Marshall once stated that "the power to tax in- volves the power to destroy."' Considering our nation's long-standing policy of preserving Indian reservation land and fostering Indian eco- nomic development,2 it is not surprising that the Supreme Court has found Indian reservation land and activities exempt from state taxa- tion.3 Since the turn of the century, the Court has held that American 1. McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316, 327 (1819). 2. See, e.g., Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, 25 U.S.C. § 450a(b) (1988) (stating a congressional commitment to establishing a "meaningful In- dian self-determination policy which will permit an orderly transition from the Federal domination of programs for, and services to Indians to effective and meaningful partici- pation by Indian people"); Indian Financing Act of 1974, 25 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Settlers on the Osage Diminished Reserve: a Study Of
    KANSAS SETTLERS ON THE OSAGE DIMINISHED RESERVE 168 KANSAS HISTORY A Study of Laura Ingalls Wilder’s Little House on the Prairie by Penny T. Linsenmayer aura Ingalls Wilder’s widely acclaimed “Little the Sturges Treaty in the context of public land policy. Each House” series of children’s novels traces her life side committed acts of violence and property destruction with her parents and sisters from the late 1860s against the other, but historical evidence supports the until her marriage to Almanzo Wilder in 1885. proposition that the majority of both Osages and settlers LThe primary focus of Wilder’s third novel, Little House on favored and actively promoted peaceful relations. Howev- the Prairie, was the interaction between the pioneer settlers er, the overall relationship between the parties was marked of Kansas and the Osage Indians. Wilder’s family settled in by an unavoidable degree of tension. The settlers who pro- Montgomery County, Kansas, in 1869–1870, approximate- moted peaceful relations desired that the land be opened ly one year before the final removal of the Osages to Indi- up to them for settlement, and even the Osages who fa- an Territory. The novel depicts some of the pivotal events vored a speedy removal to Indian Territory merely tolerat- in the relations between the Osages and the intruding set- ed the intruders. tlers during that time period.1 The Ingalls family arrived in Kansas with a large tide The Osages ceded much of their Great Plains territory of other squatters in the summer and fall of 1869, a point at to the United States in the first half of the nineteenth cen- which relations between settlers and Osages were most tury and finally were left in 1865 with one remaining tract strained.
    [Show full text]
  • Lands of the Lakota: Policy, Culture and Land Use on the Pine Ridge
    1 Lands of the Lakota: Policy, Culture and Land Use on the Pine Ridge Reservation Joseph Stromberg Senior Honors Thesis Environmental Studies and Anthropology Washington University in St. Louis 2 Abstract Land is invested with tremendous historical and cultural significance for the Oglala Lakota Nation of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. Widespread alienation from direct land use among tribal members also makes land a key element in exploring the roots of present-day problems—over two thirds of the reservation’s agricultural income goes to non-Natives, while the majority of households live below the poverty line. In order to understand how current patterns in land use are linked with federal policy and tribal culture, this study draws on three sources: (1) archival research on tribal history, especially in terms of territory loss, political transformation, ethnic division, economic coercion, and land use; (2) an account of contemporary problems on the reservation, with an analysis of current land policy and use pattern; and (3) primary qualitative ethnographic research conducted on the reservation with tribal members. Findings indicate that federal land policies act to effectively block direct land use. Tribal members have responded to policy in ways relative to the expression of cultural values, and the intent of policy has been undermined by a failure to fully understand the cultural context of the reservation. The discussion interprets land use through the themes of policy obstacles, forced incorporation into the world-system, and resistance via cultural sovereignty over land use decisions. Acknowledgements I would like to sincerely thank the Buder Center for American Indian Studies of the George Warren Brown School of Social Work as well as the Environmental Studies Program, for support in conducting research.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERIOR BOARD of INDIAN APPEALS Kickapoo Tribe Of
    INTERIOR BOARD OF INDIAN APPEALS Kickapoo Tribe of Indians of the Kickapoo Reservation in Kansas v. Southern Plains Regional Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs 42 IBIA 258 (03/29/2006) United States Department of the Interior OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS INTERIOR BOARD OF INDIAN APPEALS 801 NORTH QUINCY STREET SUITE 300 ARLINGTON, VA 22203 KICKAPOO TRIBE OF INDIANS OF : Order Affirming Decision THE KICKAPOO RESERVATION : IN KANSAS, : Appellant, : : v. : Docket No. IBIA 04-98-A : SOUTHERN PLAINS REGIONAL : DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN : AFFAIRS, : Appellee. : March 29, 2006 The Kickapoo Tribe of Indians of the Kickapoo Reservation in Kansas (Tribe) seeks review of an April 2, 2004 decision of the Southern Plains Regional Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs (Regional Director; BIA), in which the Regional Director concluded that BIA was not statutorily required to accept certain property in trust for the Tribe. The property at issue consists of three tracts of land, consisting of 74.81 acres, more or less, located in Brown County, Kansas. The property is generally referred to as the “Highway 75 (Simon) tract.” For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the Regional Director’s decision. Background On January 5, 1979, the United States Court of Claims awarded judgment to the Tribe in Indian Claims Commission Docket No. 315, see The Kickapoo Tribe of Kansas, The Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. 719, 618 F.2d 119 (1979), and Congress subsequently appropriated funds to pay the judgment. As required by the Indian Tribal Judgment Funds Use or Distribution Act, 25 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • To: Chairman Lance Kinzer and Members of the House Judiciary Committee
    To: Chairman Lance Kinzer And Members of the House Judiciary Committee From: Steve Cadue Tribal Chairman Kickapoo Tribe in Kansas 1107 Goldfinch Road Horton, Kansas 66439 Re: HB 2553 – Nemaha-Brown Watershed Funding Bill Date: February 29, 2012 Good afternoon Chairman Kinzer and Members of the House Judiciary Committee. I am Steve Cadue, Tribal Chairman of the sovereign Kickapoo Nation and I appear before you today to oppose HB 2553. I am opposed to the continuing damaging effort of the Nemaha Brown Watershed District to prevent the Kickapoo Tribe of securing a safe and dependable water supply. Water is life and yes, for the Kickapoo people it is a matter of Life or Perish. We depend on water for a total life-sustaining need including drinking water, health conditions and spiritual blessings. Our Kickapoo people utilized and are dependent on water before the coming of the white man. The United States Supreme Court, Winters v. United States (1908) cited Indian tribal rights original use of water and declared Indian tribe’s use of water before the coming of the white man. Our Kickapoo treaty is the Supreme Law of the Land and is under the protection of the federal trust responsibility of the United States to Indian tribes. Water is a sacred element in our Kickapoo traditions. Water is life. Our Kickapoo tribal reservation homeland is a federally recognized reservation and exists due to treaty agreements with the United States of America. We settled in the land that was called the Kansas territory in the treaty of l832 on the western banks of the Missouri river at Leavenworth.
    [Show full text]
  • AIHREA2012 Annual Report
    AIHREA The American Indian Health Education is important and we we have established an academic Research & Education Alliance want to increase the number of pipeline to improve the educational (AIHREA) is an alliance of organi- American Indians entering the attainment of all American Indians. zations whose mission is to partner health professions and conducting We have scholarships available and collaborate with American health research. To meet this goal, to help! Indian peoples, Nations, communi- ties, and organizations to improve the physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual wellbeing of American Indians throughout the United States through quality participatory research and education. The two primary organizations involved are the Center for American Indian Community Health (CAICH) at the University of Kansas Medical Center and the Center for American Indian Studies (CAIS) at AIHREA Collaborators: Johnson County Community American Indian Council, Inc. College. We partner and collabo- Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Title 1 Program rate with numerous other organiza- Chickasaw Nation tions, conducting research with and Children's Mercy Hospital Center for Environmental Health providing services to the American Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Indian community in the Denver Indian Health and Family Resources Heartland and around the country. First Nations Student Association (University of Kansas) We use community-based partic- Haskell Indian Nations University Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska ipatory research (CBPR) in all of Kansas City Indian Center our studies. CBPR is a type of Kickapoo Diabetes Coalition research that involves community Kickapoo Head Start members in all parts of the research Kickapoo Tribe in Kansas process. Almost 80% of our team Minnesota Indian Women's Resource Center members are American Indians Oglala Lakota Nation from many different Nations across Omaha Tribe of Nebraska Ponca Tribe of Nebraska the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • 172 Tribe Motion for Summary J
    Case: 3:18-cv-00992-jdp Document #: 172 Filed: 12/02/19 Page 1 of 64 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN LAC COURTE OREILLES BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWA INDIANS OF WISCONSIN, et al., Plaintiffs, Court File No. 18-cv-992-jdp v. TONY EVERS, Governor of the State of Wisconsin, et al., Defendants. Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff Tribes’ Motion for Summary Judgment Introduction and Legal Standard Summary judgment is appropriate where the movant has demonstrated there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact, and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986). As the moving party, the Tribes bear the initial burden of demonstrating the absence of any genuine issues of material fact. Scaife v. Cook Cnty., 446 F.3d 735, 739 (7th Cir. 2006). Once the Tribes make this demonstration, however, the Defendants must then set forth, through competent and material evidence, specific facts establishing a genuine issue for 1 Case: 3:18-cv-00992-jdp Document #: 172 Filed: 12/02/19 Page 2 of 64 trial. See Lindemann v. Mobil Oil Corp., 141 F.3d 1286, 1291 (7th Cir. 1997); Contreras v. City of Chi., 119 F.3d 1286, 1290 (7th Cir. 1997). An issue of fact is “genuine” only “if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party,” and it is “material” only if the fact, if established, might affect the outcome of the lawsuit under the substantive law of the case.
    [Show full text]
  • The Modoc Nation (Formerly Known As the “Modoc Tribe”), A
    The Modoc Nation (formerly known as the “Modoc Tribe”), a federally recognized native nation by virtue of the Lakes Treaty of 1864 and the Klamath Tribe Restoration Act of 1986 We can no longer tolerate outright refusal of protecting our best interest. If the current conditions were to continue the outright extermination of our people would be complete. Our Ancestral land and water rights will be non- existent and we will be unable to hunt fish and gather as we have always done since time immemorial. We have always been the Modoc Tribe of Northern California and Southern Oregon. We have always been a separate tribe, we were never a band of the Klamath’s and we have never relinquished our Federal Recognition. Our Tribe existed long before there was a California or Oregon. Our tribe is a Federally Recognized Tribe, instead of taking things out of context and stating we are not separate from the Klamath Tribe. (Although the short terminology refers to the Klamath Tribe or Tribes, the long definition has always stated 3 separate tribes in all treaties). There is the Modoc Tribe of Oklahoma, who was forced there not by choice and chose to stay rather than be forced to live with the Klamath tribe. There are Modocs enrolled in the Klamath Tribe(s) as “Klamath”, since the Klamath tribe refuses to acknowledge the Modoc tribe (except when there is financial gain by using our name). We represent all Modoc people of Northern California and Southern Oregon who are enrolled in The Modoc Nation as “Modoc” as we are the Modoc Tribe who have existed in our Ancestral Homelands for over fourteen thousand years or more.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register Nomination
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior Listed in the National Park Service National Register June 27, 2016 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property Historic name Iowa Tribe Community Building Other names/site number KHRI # 013-238 Name of related Multiple Property Listing New Deal-Era Resources of Kansas 2. Location th Street & number 330 Road not for publication City or town White Cloud X vicinity State Kansas Code KS County Brown Code 013 Zip code 66094 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this x nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property x_ meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national statewide x local Applicable National Register Criteria: x A B C ___D See file.
    [Show full text]