DOCSLIB.ORG

Supp 5 Title III and Title VI

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supp 5 Title III and Title VI ACL State by State Total for Covid Supplement #5 Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 supplemental funding for the OAA nutrition program under Title III-C2 of the Older Americans Act State Part C2. Home Meals Alabama $2,528,346 Alaska $840,000 Arizona $3,786,823 Arkansas $1,536,749 California $17,520,720 Colorado $2,569,933 Connecticut $1,890,526 Delaware $840,000 Dist. of $840,000 Columbia Florida $12,750,236 Georgia $4,604,882 Hawaii $840,000 Idaho $862,415 Illinois $6,145,904 Indiana $3,264,441 Iowa $1,635,969 Kansas $1,421,264 Kentucky $2,249,141 Louisiana $2,239,417 Maine $843,890 Maryland $2,906,228 Massachusetts $3,500,618 Michigan $5,303,695 Minnesota $2,775,861 Mississippi $1,457,813 Missouri $3,165,493 Montana $840,000 Nebraska $930,790 Nevada $1,471,240 New Hampshire $840,000 New Jersey $4,439,739 New Mexico $1,087,189 New York $9,810,549 North Carolina $5,202,534 North Dakota $840,000 Ohio $6,136,966 Oklahoma $1,890,839 Oregon $2,241,513 Pennsylvania $7,099,301 Rhode Island $840,000 South Carolina $2,755,035 South Dakota $840,000 Tennessee $3,406,138 Texas $11,414,900 Utah $1,104,103 Vermont $840,000 Virginia $4,077,856 Washington $3,628,725 West Virginia $1,072,295 Wisconsin $3,061,217 Wyoming $840,000 American $105,000 Samoa Guam $420,000 Northern $105,000 Marianas Puerto Rico $1,918,707 Virgin Islands $420,000 Total $168,000,000 Supplemental funding for the OAA nutrition and supportive services programs under the authority of OAA Title VI, Parts A & B Tribe State Tribe Name Total Award AK Aleutian Pribilof Islands Association, Inc. $31,080 AK Arctic Slope Native Association, Limited $31,080 AK Asa'carsarmiut Tribe $16,710 AK Association of Village Council Presidents $31,080 AK Bristol Bay Native Association $31,080 AK Central Council Tlingit & Haida Indian Tribes of AK $31,080 AK Chickaloon Native Village $21,530 AK Chilkoot Indian Association $16,710 AK Chugachmiut $21,530 AK Copper River Native Association $16,710 AK Craig Tribal Association $16,710 AK Denakkanaaga, Inc. $18,950 AK Fairbanks Native Association $31,080 AK Galena Village (aka Louden Village Council) $16,710 AK Gwichyaa Zhee Gwich'in Tribal Government $16,710 AK Hoonah Indian Association $16,710 AK Kenaitze Indian Tribe $31,080 AK Ketchikan Indian Community $26,830 AK Klawock Cooperative Association $16,710 AK Knik Tribe $31,080 AK Kodiak Area Native Association - Northern Region $18,950 AK Kodiak Area Native Association - Southern Region $21,530 AK Kootznoowoo Inc. $16,710 AK Maniilaq Association $31,080 AK Metlakatla Indian Community $24,260 AK Native Village of Barrow $31,080 AK Native Village of Eyak Traditional Council $16,710 AK Native Village of Gambell $18,950 AK Native Village of Point Hope $16,710 AK Native Village of Savoonga $18,950 AK Native Village of Unalakleet $18,950 AK Organized Village of Kake $16,710 AK Organized Village of Saxman $16,710 AK Orutsararmuit Native Council $31,080 AK Seldovia Village Tribe $16,710 AK Sitka Tribes of Alaska $24,260 AK Southcentral Foundation $40,800 AK Tanana Chiefs Conference for Kuskokwim subregion $16,710 AK Tanana Chiefs Conference for Lower Yukon Subregion $16,710 AK Tanana Chiefs Conference for Yukon Flats Subregion $18,950 AK Tanana Chiefs Conference for Yukon Koyukuk $18,950 Subregion AK Tanana Chiefs Conference for Yukon Tanana Subregion $16,710 AK Wrangell Cooperative Association $18,950 AK Yakutat Tlingit Tribe $16,710 AL Poarch Band of Creek Indians $31,080 AZ Ak-Chin Indian Community $16,710 AZ Cocopah Indian Tribe $16,710 AZ Colorado River Indian Tribes $31,080 AZ Gila River Indian Community $31,080 AZ Havasupai Tribe $16,710 AZ Hopi Tribe $31,080 AZ Hualapai Tribe $21,530 AZ Inter-Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. $18,950 AZ Navajo Nation $40,800 AZ Pascua Yaqui Tribe $40,800 AZ Quechan Indian Tribe $21,530 AZ Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community $26,830 AZ San Carlos Apache Older Adult Center $31,080 AZ Tohono O'odham Nation $40,800 AZ White Mountain Apache Tribe $40,800 AZ Yavapai-Apache Tribe $21,530 CA Bishop Paiute Tribe $21,530 CA Blue Lake Rancheria $16,710 CA CA Big Valley Rancheria of Pomo Indians $16,710 CA CA Indian Manpower Consort-LaJolla & Susanville $18,950 Ranche CA CA Indian Manpower Consortium, Inc. - Berry Creek, $18,950 CA CA Indian Manpower Consortium, Inc. - Big Sandy, $18,950 CA CA Indian Manpower Consortium, Inc. - Chico, $18,950 CA CA Indian Manpower Consortium, Inc. - Coyote Valley, $18,950 CA CA Indian Manpower Consortium, Inc. - Enterprise, $32,070 CA CA Indian Manpower Consortium, Inc. - North Fork, $16,710 CA CA Indian Manpower Consortium, Inc. - Robinson, $18,950 CA Fort Mojave Indian Tribe $18,950 CA Indian Senior Center, Inc. $18,950 CA K'ima:w Medical Center $26,830 CA Karuk Tribe $24,260 CA Pala Band of Mission Indians $21,530 CA Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians $21,530 CA Pit River Health Service, Inc. $21,530 CA Redding Rancheria $31,080 CA Riverside-San Bernardino Co. Indian Health-Morongo $24,260 CA Riverside-San Bernardino Co. Indian Health-Pechanga $16,710 CA Riverside-San Bernardino Co. Indian Health-Soboba/ $16,710 CA Round Valley Indian Tribes Senior Center $16,710 CA Santa Ynez Tribal Health Clinic $16,710 CA Sonoma County Indian Health Project - Manchester $16,710 CA Sonoma County Indian Health Project - Sonoma $40,800 CA Southern Indian Health Council, Inc. - Area I $16,710 CA Southern Indian Health Council, Inc. - Area II $16,710 CA Toiyabe Indian Health Project, Inc. - Northern $16,710 CA Toiyabe Indian Health Project, Inc. - Southern $18,950 CA Tule River Indian Health Center, Inc. $21,530 CA United Indian Health Services Inc. for Resighini $18,950 CA United Indian Health Services Inc. for Tolowa $21,530 CA Wilton Rancheria $40,800 CA Wiyot Tribe $18,950 CA YUROK TRIBE $26,830 CO Southern Ute Indian Tribe $26,830 CO Ute Mountain Ute Tribe $21,530 CT Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation $16,710 CT Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Connecticut $18,950 HI Alu Like, Inc. $40,800 IA Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa $18,950 ID Coeur d'Alene Tribe $18,950 ID Nez Perce Tribe $31,080 ID Shoshone-Bannock Tribes $31,080 KS Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska $16,710 KS Kickapoo Tribe in Kansas $18,950 KS Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation $21,530 LA Institute for Indian Development, Inc. $24,260 MA Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe $24,260 MA Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) $18,950 ME Aroostook Band of Micmacs $18,950 ME Penobscot Indian Nation $18,950 ME Pleasant Point Passamaquoddy $21,530 MI Bay Mills Indian Community $18,950 MI Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians $21,530 MI Inter-Tribal Council of Michigan, Inc. $18,950 MI Keweenaw Bay Indian Community $21,530 MI Little River Band of Ottawa Indians $26,830 MI Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians $31,080 MI Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Potawatomi $16,710 MI Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians $21,530 MI Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians $40,800 MN Bois Forte Band of Chippewa $18,950 MN Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa $31,080 MN Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Chippewa $18,950 MN Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe $31,080 MN Lower Sioux Indian Community $18,950 MN Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe $21,530 MN Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians $31,080 MN White Earth Reservation Tribal Council $31,080 MS Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians $31,080 MT Blackfeet Tribe - Eagle Shield Center $31,080 MT Chippewa Cree Tribe Senior Citizens Department $24,260 MT Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes $31,080 MT Crow Tribal Elders Program $31,080 MT Fort Belknap Indian Community $24,260 MT Fort Peck Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes $31,080 MT Northern Cheyenne Elderly Program $31,080 NC Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians $31,080 ND Spirit Lake Tribe $21,530 ND Standing Rock Sioux Tribe $40,800 ND Three Affiliated Tribes $31,080 ND Trenton Indian Service Area $21,530 ND Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians $40,800 NE Omaha Tribe of Nebraska $21,530 NE Ponca Tribe of Nebraska $18,950 NE Santee Sioux Nation $16,710 NE Winnebago Comprehensive Healthcare System $18,950 NM Eight Northern Indian Pueblos Council, Inc. (San) $24,260 NM Eight Northern Indian Pueblos Council, Inc.(Picuris,etc) $31,080 NM Jicarilla Apache Nation $31,080 NM Laguna Rainbow Corporation $31,080 NM Mescalero Apache Tribe Elderly Program $26,830 NM Ohkay Owingeh Senior Citizens Program $24,260 NM Pueblo de Cochiti Elder Program $18,950 NM Pueblo of Acoma $24,260 NM Pueblo of Isleta Elder Center $31,080 NM Pueblo of Jemez Senior Citizens Program $31,080 NM PUEBLO OF POJOAQUE $16,710 NM Pueblo of San Felipe Elderly Services Program $31,080 NM Pueblo of Tesuque $16,710 NM PUEBLO OF ZIA $18,950 NM Santa Ana Pueblo $18,950 NM Santa Clara Pueblo Senior Center $31,080 NM Santo Domingo Tribe $31,080 NM Taos Pueblo Senior Citizens Program $24,260 NM Zuni Tribe $40,800 NV Elko Band Council $18,950 NV Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribes $21,530 NV INTER-TRIBAL COUNCIL OF NEVADA, INC (Ely) $16,710 NV INTER-TRIBAL COUNCIL OF NEVADA, INC (Moapa) $16,710 NV INTER-TRIBAL COUNCIL OF NEVADA, INC (Duckwater) $16,710 NV INTER-TRIBAL COUNCIL OF NEVADA, INC (Yomba) $16,710 NV INTER-TRIBAL COUNCIL OF NEVADA, INC (Fort $16,710 McDermitt) NV INTER-TRIBAL COUNCIL OF NEVADA, INC (Battle $18,950 Mountain) NV INTER-TRIBAL COUNCIL OF NEVADA, INC (Lovelock) $16,710 NV INTER-TRIBAL COUNCIL OF NEVADA, INC (South Fork) $16,710 NV Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe $21,530 NV Reno-Sparks Indian Colony $18,950 NV Shoshone-Paiute Tribes $21,530 NV Walker River Paiute Tribe $18,950 NV Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California $31,080 NV Yerington Paiute
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tribal Relations and Consultation at Txdot
    Tribal Relations and Consultation at TxDOT Draft Strategic Plan 2016 Archeological Studies Branch, Cultural Resources Management (CRM) Section, Environmental Affairs Division (ENV) Vision for Tribal Relations and Consultation at TxDOT The Texas Department of Transportation is a best-in-class agency that goes above and beyond the spirit of consultation to work collaboratively with federally recognized Native American tribes toward mutually beneficial outcomes during all levels of the transportation process. Mission of the Tribal Relations and Consultation Program: Build relationships and purposefully collaborate with tribal nations in the planning and implementation of TxDOT projects and programs. In working with tribal nations, TxDOT: . Recognizes the inherent sovereign status and reserved rights of tribes; . Practices and promotes cultural sensitivity when working with tribes; . Honors the spirit of various federal requirements and orders to consult with tribes; . Aims to go above and beyond current practices to foster trust and productivity; . Commits to providing meaningful and substantive consultation with tribes on transportation projects; and . Promotes collaborative consultation opportunities during planning and review processes within TXDOT. 2 Draft Tribal Relations and Consultation Strategic Plan 2016 Foreword Texas’ long and rich cultural history is rooted in the indigenous people who once inhabited the land. Tribal nations continue to have an inherent interest in the state’s natural and cultural resources. Today, the federal government recognizes tribes’ inherent sovereign status, a unique relationship that is embodied in the U.S. Constitution, treaties, court decisions, federal statutes and executive orders. As TxDOT builds a safe and reliable transportation system, the agency (on behalf of the Federal Highway Administration) consults with tribes on statewide transportation plans and projects with federal funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Settlers on the Osage Diminished Reserve: a Study Of
    KANSAS SETTLERS ON THE OSAGE DIMINISHED RESERVE 168 KANSAS HISTORY A Study of Laura Ingalls Wilder’s Little House on the Prairie by Penny T. Linsenmayer aura Ingalls Wilder’s widely acclaimed “Little the Sturges Treaty in the context of public land policy. Each House” series of children’s novels traces her life side committed acts of violence and property destruction with her parents and sisters from the late 1860s against the other, but historical evidence supports the until her marriage to Almanzo Wilder in 1885. proposition that the majority of both Osages and settlers LThe primary focus of Wilder’s third novel, Little House on favored and actively promoted peaceful relations. Howev- the Prairie, was the interaction between the pioneer settlers er, the overall relationship between the parties was marked of Kansas and the Osage Indians. Wilder’s family settled in by an unavoidable degree of tension. The settlers who pro- Montgomery County, Kansas, in 1869–1870, approximate- moted peaceful relations desired that the land be opened ly one year before the final removal of the Osages to Indi- up to them for settlement, and even the Osages who fa- an Territory. The novel depicts some of the pivotal events vored a speedy removal to Indian Territory merely tolerat- in the relations between the Osages and the intruding set- ed the intruders. tlers during that time period.1 The Ingalls family arrived in Kansas with a large tide The Osages ceded much of their Great Plains territory of other squatters in the summer and fall of 1869, a point at to the United States in the first half of the nineteenth cen- which relations between settlers and Osages were most tury and finally were left in 1865 with one remaining tract strained.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERIOR BOARD of INDIAN APPEALS Kickapoo Tribe Of
    INTERIOR BOARD OF INDIAN APPEALS Kickapoo Tribe of Indians of the Kickapoo Reservation in Kansas v. Southern Plains Regional Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs 42 IBIA 258 (03/29/2006) United States Department of the Interior OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS INTERIOR BOARD OF INDIAN APPEALS 801 NORTH QUINCY STREET SUITE 300 ARLINGTON, VA 22203 KICKAPOO TRIBE OF INDIANS OF : Order Affirming Decision THE KICKAPOO RESERVATION : IN KANSAS, : Appellant, : : v. : Docket No. IBIA 04-98-A : SOUTHERN PLAINS REGIONAL : DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN : AFFAIRS, : Appellee. : March 29, 2006 The Kickapoo Tribe of Indians of the Kickapoo Reservation in Kansas (Tribe) seeks review of an April 2, 2004 decision of the Southern Plains Regional Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs (Regional Director; BIA), in which the Regional Director concluded that BIA was not statutorily required to accept certain property in trust for the Tribe. The property at issue consists of three tracts of land, consisting of 74.81 acres, more or less, located in Brown County, Kansas. The property is generally referred to as the “Highway 75 (Simon) tract.” For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the Regional Director’s decision. Background On January 5, 1979, the United States Court of Claims awarded judgment to the Tribe in Indian Claims Commission Docket No. 315, see The Kickapoo Tribe of Kansas, The Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. 719, 618 F.2d 119 (1979), and Congress subsequently appropriated funds to pay the judgment. As required by the Indian Tribal Judgment Funds Use or Distribution Act, 25 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • To: Chairman Lance Kinzer and Members of the House Judiciary Committee
    To: Chairman Lance Kinzer And Members of the House Judiciary Committee From: Steve Cadue Tribal Chairman Kickapoo Tribe in Kansas 1107 Goldfinch Road Horton, Kansas 66439 Re: HB 2553 – Nemaha-Brown Watershed Funding Bill Date: February 29, 2012 Good afternoon Chairman Kinzer and Members of the House Judiciary Committee. I am Steve Cadue, Tribal Chairman of the sovereign Kickapoo Nation and I appear before you today to oppose HB 2553. I am opposed to the continuing damaging effort of the Nemaha Brown Watershed District to prevent the Kickapoo Tribe of securing a safe and dependable water supply. Water is life and yes, for the Kickapoo people it is a matter of Life or Perish. We depend on water for a total life-sustaining need including drinking water, health conditions and spiritual blessings. Our Kickapoo people utilized and are dependent on water before the coming of the white man. The United States Supreme Court, Winters v. United States (1908) cited Indian tribal rights original use of water and declared Indian tribe’s use of water before the coming of the white man. Our Kickapoo treaty is the Supreme Law of the Land and is under the protection of the federal trust responsibility of the United States to Indian tribes. Water is a sacred element in our Kickapoo traditions. Water is life. Our Kickapoo tribal reservation homeland is a federally recognized reservation and exists due to treaty agreements with the United States of America. We settled in the land that was called the Kansas territory in the treaty of l832 on the western banks of the Missouri river at Leavenworth.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal and House District Boundaries
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribal Boundaries and Oklahoma House Boundaries ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 22 ! 18 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 13 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 20 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 7 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Cimarron ! ! ! ! 14 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 11 ! ! Texas ! ! Harper ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! n ! ! Beaver ! ! ! ! Ottawa ! ! ! ! Kay 9 o ! Woods ! ! ! ! Grant t ! 61 ! ! ! ! ! Nowata ! ! ! ! ! 37 ! ! ! g ! ! ! ! 7 ! 2 ! ! ! ! Alfalfa ! n ! ! ! ! ! 10 ! ! 27 i ! ! ! ! ! Craig ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! h ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 26 s ! ! Osage 25 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! W ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 21 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 58 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 38 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes by House District ! 11 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 Absentee Shawnee* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Woodward ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! 36 ! Apache* ! ! ! 40 ! 17 ! ! ! 5 8 ! ! ! Rogers ! ! ! ! ! Garfield ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 40 ! ! ! ! ! 3 Noble ! ! ! Caddo* ! ! Major ! ! Delaware ! ! ! ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! Mayes ! ! Pawnee ! ! ! 19 ! ! 2 41 ! ! ! ! ! 9 ! 4 ! 74 ! ! ! Cherokee ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ellis ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 41 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 72 ! ! ! ! ! 35 4 8 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 5 3 42 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 77
    [Show full text]
  • For the Osage Nation
    AGENDA ITEM REPORT Meeting Date: May 11, 2021 Staff Contact: Carol Lahman, City Attorney Department: Legal Subject: Approve the Execution of the Forbearance Agreement entered into by The Osage Nation, the City of Enid and the Enid Municipal Authority, and authorize payment in the amount of $1,000,000.00. Background: To allow the Kaw Lake Water Supply Project to proceed, the City of Enid has been in negotiations with The Osage Nation to find an accommodation for the City project that would not affect The Osage Nation’s or the State of Oklahoma’s interest, rights or position as to natural resources, property, or water. The Forbearance Agreement, if approved, would resolve the issues between the City of Enid and The Osage Nation without either party resorting to lengthy and expensive litigation that would delay the start of the construction of the Kaw Lake pipeline. The negotiations have taken place over the last four years. If approved, the Enid Municipal Authority will pay $1,000,000.00 to The Nation within 30 days, as part of the consideration for the agreement. The City will also reserve a certain amount of the capacity in the pipeline for the Nation. This does not compromise the ability of the City to carry the full OWRB permit amount of water from Kaw Lake to Enid. The agreement provides that if the Nation, at some point, decides to make use of the capacity, that the Nation will construct and pay for the improvements necessary, and will pay for the cost of maintenance and operation attributable to this use.
    [Show full text]
  • AIHREA2012 Annual Report
    AIHREA The American Indian Health Education is important and we we have established an academic Research & Education Alliance want to increase the number of pipeline to improve the educational (AIHREA) is an alliance of organi- American Indians entering the attainment of all American Indians. zations whose mission is to partner health professions and conducting We have scholarships available and collaborate with American health research. To meet this goal, to help! Indian peoples, Nations, communi- ties, and organizations to improve the physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual wellbeing of American Indians throughout the United States through quality participatory research and education. The two primary organizations involved are the Center for American Indian Community Health (CAICH) at the University of Kansas Medical Center and the Center for American Indian Studies (CAIS) at AIHREA Collaborators: Johnson County Community American Indian Council, Inc. College. We partner and collabo- Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Title 1 Program rate with numerous other organiza- Chickasaw Nation tions, conducting research with and Children's Mercy Hospital Center for Environmental Health providing services to the American Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Indian community in the Denver Indian Health and Family Resources Heartland and around the country. First Nations Student Association (University of Kansas) We use community-based partic- Haskell Indian Nations University Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska ipatory research (CBPR) in all of Kansas City Indian Center our studies. CBPR is a type of Kickapoo Diabetes Coalition research that involves community Kickapoo Head Start members in all parts of the research Kickapoo Tribe in Kansas process. Almost 80% of our team Minnesota Indian Women's Resource Center members are American Indians Oglala Lakota Nation from many different Nations across Omaha Tribe of Nebraska Ponca Tribe of Nebraska the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Unease As Hollywood Tackles the Osage Reign of Terror Shannon Shaw Duty Gray Said the Murder of Osage News Roan Is a Very Personal Story for Him and His Family
    2018 Cultural Encampment PAGES 10-11 Volume 14, Issue 12 • November 2018 The Official Newspaper of the Osage Nation Unease as Hollywood tackles the Osage Reign of Terror Shannon Shaw Duty Gray said the murder of Osage News Roan is a very personal story for him and his family. He said Martin Scorsese and Leon- he is hoping that the filmmak- ardo DiCaprio have officially ers consult with the Osage Na- signed on to direct and star tion to tell the story not only in the film adaption of Da- of the murders but also of the vid Grann’s bestselling novel, Osages’ legacy, not just that of “Killers of the Flower Moon: the FBI. The Osage Murders and the “There’s going to be a lot Birth of the FBI.” of excitement in the air, but However, many Osage ques- when that’s all over with and tion whether the film will do the lights are down and every- justice to the Osage story. Os- one’s made their money, the car-winning screenwriter Eric Osages are still going to be Roth is reportedly earning sev- sitting there,” he said. “What’s en figures to write the script. the narrative the public is go- The book includes a lot of sen- ing to have about our people, sitive and graphic material de- about our tribe, about our tailing the systematic murders story, about our perspective? of many Osages during the That remains to be seen.” 1920s oil boom on the reserva- tion that made the Osage the Killers of the wealthiest people per capita in Flower Moon the world.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register Nomination
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior Listed in the National Park Service National Register June 27, 2016 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property Historic name Iowa Tribe Community Building Other names/site number KHRI # 013-238 Name of related Multiple Property Listing New Deal-Era Resources of Kansas 2. Location th Street & number 330 Road not for publication City or town White Cloud X vicinity State Kansas Code KS County Brown Code 013 Zip code 66094 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this x nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property x_ meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national statewide x local Applicable National Register Criteria: x A B C ___D See file.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Sill Apache Energy Planning Project
    FortFort SillSill ApacheApache EnergyEnergy PlanningPlanning ProjectProject Fort Sill Apache Tribe Apache, Oklahoma 73005 580-588-2298 1 ProjectProject OverviewOverview z To create an Energy Office within the Tribal Structure z To complete an Energy Analysis of Tribal Building Space, current and proposed z To Develop a Tribal Strategic Energy Plan 2 ProjectProject LocationLocation z Southwestern Oklahoma • Tribal Headquarters, Apache, Oklahoma • Apache Y Property • East Gore, Lawton • Future land purchases z Eastern New Mexico (Near El Paso) z Arizona 3 TribalTribal JurisdictionalJurisdictional AreaArea -- OklahomaOklahoma z The Fort Sill Apache Tribe has jurisdiction over 65 surface (4,162.2 acres) and 41 mineral (2,841.4) tracts over three counties in Southwestern Oklahoma (allotted lands) z The Fort Sill Apache Tribe owns over 400 acres in rural Caddo County and within the Lawton, OK SMSA z The Tribe anticipates other land purchases within the next 12 months 4 TribalTribal PropertiesProperties –– NewNew MexicoMexico andand ArizonaArizona z The Fort Sill Apache Tribe owns 2 acres in Arizona z Portions of New Mexico and Arizona are considered aboriginal lands z The Fort Sill Apache Tribe owns land near Deming, New Mexico, an area east of El Paso, Texas 5 ProjectProject ParticipantsParticipants z Tribal Members z Area Native Americans z Local Community z Area Utilities z State Energy Resources 6 FortFort SillSill ApacheApache TribalTribal MembersMembers z Over half of the Tribe’s membership live outside the State of Oklahoma z Almost
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Lands of Federally Recognized Tribes of the United States
    132°W 131°W 130°W 129°W 128°W 127°W 126°W 125°W 124°W 123°W 122°W 121°W 120°W 119°W 118°W 117°W 116°W 115°W 114°W 113°W 112°W 111°W 110°W 109°W 108°W 107°W 106°W 105°W 104°W 103°W 102°W 101°W 100°W 99°W 98°W 97°W 96°W 95°W 94°W 93°W 92°W 91°W 90°W 89°W 88°W 87°W 86°W 85°W 84°W 83°W 82°W 81°W 80°W 79°W 78°W 77°W 76°W 75°W 74°W 73°W 72°W 71°W 70°W 69°W 68°W 67°W 66°W 65°W 64°W 63°W 48°N 46°N 47°N Neah Bay 4 35 14 45°N Everett 46°N Taholah CANADA Seattle Nespelem 40 Aberdeen 44°N Wellpinit Browning Spokane 45°N Harlem Belcourt WAS HIN Box Wagner E GTO Plummer Elder IN N MA 10 Pablo E SUPER Wapato IO Poplar K R Toppenish A 43°N New L Town Fort Totten Red Lake NT 44°N O Lapwai RM Portland VE Sault MO Sainte Marie NTANA Cass Lake Siletz Pendleton 42°N K NH NORTH DAKOTA Ashland YOR EW 43°N Warm N Springs LA KE No H r Fort U t Yates Boston hw Billings R TS e Crow ET 41°N s Agency O S t HU Worcester O R N AC RE eg Lame Deer OTA NTARIO SS GON io MINNES E O MA 42°N n Sisseton K A Providence 23 Aberdeen L N I 39 Rochester R A Springfield Minneapolis 51 G Saint Paul T SIN I C WISCON Eagle H 40°N IDA Butte Buffalo Boise HO C I 6 41°N R M o E cky M SOUTH DAKOTA ou K AN ntai ICHIG n R A M egion Lower Brule Fort Thompson L E n Grand Rapids I io New York g 39°N e Milwaukee R Fort Hall R west 24 E d Detroit Mi E 40°N Fort Washakie K WYOMING LA Rosebud Pine Ridge Cleveland IA Redding Wagner AN Toledo LV 32 NSY PEN Philadelphia 38°N Chicago NJ A 39°N IOW Winnebago Pittsburgh Fort Wayne Elko 25 Great Plains Region Baltimore Des Moines MD E NEBRASKA OHIO D
    [Show full text]
  • Thompson Associates P.O
    THOMPSON ASSOCIATES P.O. Box467 Point of Rocks, MD 21777 Office: 703-779-8783 Fax: 202-905-0057 Cell: 301-535-0488 [email protected] COMMENT LETTER Transmitted Via First Class Mail Office of Federal Acknowledgment MS-348-SIB 1951 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20240 Re: Petition for Federal Acknowledgment Piro/Manso/Tiwa Indian Tribe of the Pueblo of San Juan Guadalupe Dear Sirs: I am writing on behalf of the Fort Sill - Chiricahua/Warm Springs - Apache Tribe (FSA Tribe) in my capacity as Tribal Attorney regarding the Federal Acknowledgement Petition of the group called the Piro/Manso/Tiwa Indian Tribe of the Pueblo of San Juan Guadalupe. (Petition # 5) This group apparently filed an application or a supplemental application for Federal Acknowledgement on or about September 29, 2015. Although as will be pointed out in our Comment Letter and as outlined on your website; the Tribe has also filed numerous previous submissions for recognition to the Office of Federal Acknowledgement. As you are aware from The FSA Tribe's previous communications regarding Petition# 5; the FSA Tribe believes that it was not provided adequate and lawful Notice as required under 25 C.F.R. § 83.22(b)(2)(1V) by the Office of Federal Acknowledgement (OFA). 1 And thus the Tribe believes it should be afforded additional time, past the March 28, 2016 deadline, to provide comments on Petition # 5. The Tribe today, filed a "Request for Reconsideration of Fort Sill Apache Tribe's Request for Extension of Time to Comment on Piro/Manso/Tiwa Federal Acknowledgement Petition" to the Assistant Secretary - Indian Affairs (Enclosure 1) The Tribe wants to be abundantly clear that in filing this "Comment Letter"; the Tribe is not waiving any of its rights with regard to the issues raised in its Request for Reconsideration and that the Tribe still requests additional time as outlined in its Request for Reconsideration to further supplement this submission.
    [Show full text]