DOCSLIB.ORG

Replicators' Baseline Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Replicators' Baseline Assessment Report Ref. Ares(2019)3546251 - 31/05/2019 Replicators’ Baseline Assessment Report D1.4 Due date of deliverable: 31-05-2019 Actual submission date: 31-05-2019 Author: Francisco Barrientos, David Olmedo, Pedro Martín-Lerones, Ana López Participant: 4 - CARTIF Call: H2020-SC5-2016-2017 Number: 776465 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 776465 D1.4 / Replicators Baseline Assessment Report Programme and Procedures 1. Table of Contents 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................... 2 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ................................................................................................................. 7 3. SUMMARY / ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................... 9 4. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 10 4.1 DATA COLLECTION ................................................................................................................................... 10 5. REPLICATORS BASELINE ......................................................................................................................... 12 5.1 PILGRIMAGE (R1): OLD TRADITIONS AND MODERN WORLD ALONG THE PILGRIMAGE ROUTE TO HEMMABERG ................ 12 5.1.1 OVERALL DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................................................... 12 5.1.2 MAIN FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................. 14 5.1.3 BASELINE ......................................................................................................................................................... 16 5.1.4 KPIS ............................................................................................................................................................... 19 5.1.5 STATE OF THE ART ............................................................................................................................................. 20 5.1.6 SUPPORTS FOR REPLICATION ............................................................................................................................... 21 5.1.7 POTENTIAL ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN ....................................................................................................................... 22 5.2 LOCAL FOOD (R2): MAGMA UNESCO GLOBAL GEOPARK ................................................................................. 25 5.2.1 OVERALL DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................................................... 25 5.2.2 MAIN FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................. 26 5.2.3 BASELINE ......................................................................................................................................................... 27 5.2.4 KPIS ............................................................................................................................................................... 29 5.2.5 STATE OF THE ART ............................................................................................................................................. 31 5.2.6 SUPPORTS FOR REPLICATION ............................................................................................................................... 34 5.2.7 POTENTIAL ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN ....................................................................................................................... 34 5.3 MIGRATION (R3): GEO-NATURPARK BERGSTRAßE ODENWALD E.V. .................................................................... 42 5.3.1 OVERALL DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................................................... 42 5.3.2 MAIN FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................. 43 5.3.3 BASELINE ......................................................................................................................................................... 43 5.3.4 KPIS ............................................................................................................................................................... 45 5.3.5 STATE OF THE ART ............................................................................................................................................. 46 5.3.6 SUPPORTS FOR REPLICATION ............................................................................................................................... 47 5.3.7 POTENTIAL ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN ....................................................................................................................... 48 5.4 ARTS & FESTIVALS (R4): KULTURNO IZOBRAZEVALNO DRUSTVO KIBLA ............................................................... 52 5.4.1 OVERALL DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................................................... 52 5.4.2 MAIN FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................. 53 5.4.3 BASELINE ......................................................................................................................................................... 54 5.4.4 KPIS ............................................................................................................................................................... 56 5.4.5 STATE OF THE ART ............................................................................................................................................. 57 5.4.6 SUPPORTS FOR REPLICATION ............................................................................................................................... 58 5.4.7 POTENTIAL ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN ....................................................................................................................... 60 5.5 RESILIENCE (R5): COMUNE DI APPIGNANO DEL TRONTO (COAPP) ....................................................................... 63 5.5.1 OVERALL DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................................................... 63 5.5.2 MAIN FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................. 64 5.5.3 BASELINE ......................................................................................................................................................... 64 2 D1.4 / Replicators Baseline Assessment Report Programme and Procedures 5.5.4 KPIS ............................................................................................................................................................... 66 5.5.5 STATE OF THE ART ............................................................................................................................................. 67 5.5.6 SUPPORTS FOR REPLICATION ............................................................................................................................... 69 5.5.7 POTENTIAL ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN ....................................................................................................................... 71 5.6 LANDSCAPE (R6): INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT OF MADRA GEOPARK IN GEDIZ-BAKIRCAY BASINS .............................. 78 5.6.1 OVERALL DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................................................... 78 5.6.2 MAIN FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................. 79 5.6.3 BASELINE ......................................................................................................................................................... 79 5.6.4 KPIS ............................................................................................................................................................... 82 5.6.5 STATE OF THE ART ............................................................................................................................................. 83 5.6.6 SUPPORTS FOR REPLICATION ............................................................................................................................... 85 5.6.7 POTENTIAL ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN ....................................................................................................................... 85 6. CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 88 7. ANNEX I – KPIS TABLES .......................................................................................................................... 90 8. ANNEX II – REPLICATORS’ ONLINE BASELINE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supplerande Kartlegging Av Naturtypar I Rogaland I 2010
    Miljørapport nr. 1 - 2011 Supplerande kartlegging av naturtypar i Rogaland i 2010. Av John Bjarne Jordal og John Inge Johnsen Fylkesmannen i Rogaland, miljøvernavdelinga MILJØRAPPORT FYLKESMANNEN I ROGALAND MILJØVERNAVDELINGA Postadresse: Kontoradresse: Postboks 0059 Statens Hus 4001 STAVANGER Lagårdsvegen 78 Tlf. 51 56 87 00 4010 STAVANGER Forfattarar: John Bjarne Jordal og John Inge Johnsen Rapportnr.: 1-2011 Internettversjon, pdf-format Dato: 15.02.2011 Prosjektansvarleg Fylkesmannen i Rogaland Faggruppe: Geografisk område: Rogaland Emneord: Biologisk mangfald, Prioriterte naturtypar, Sidetal: 114 s. Kulturlandskap, Myr, Skog, Lav, Mose, Planter, Sopp Finansieringskjelde: Direktoratet for naturforvaltning Arkiv-nummer: Samandrag: Det er i 2010 utført supplerande kartlegging av prioriterte naturtypar i Rogaland etter ein fastsett, nasjonal metodikk. Det er lagt særleg vekt på registrering i Sokndal kommune. Følgjande kommunar er oppsøkt, tal skildra naturtypelokalitetar i parentes: Sokndal (49), Sola (1), Suldal (8) og Vindafjord (1). Det er skildra 59 naturtypelokalitetar frå hovudnaturtypane myr (2), berg/rasmark (4), kulturlandskap (13), ferskvatn/våtmark (16), skog (22) og marint (2). 17 lokalitetar fekk verdi A (svært viktig), 39 verdi B (viktig) og 3 verdi C (lokalt viktig). Det er under feltarbeidet gjort 198 funn av 28 nasjonale raudlisteartar etter 2006-raudlista (gjaldt under feltarbeidet), av desse er det 103 funn av lav (12 artar), 32 funn av mosar (4 artar), 56 funn av karplanter (3 artar) og 7 funn av sopp (6 artar). Tilsvarande er det gjort 209 funn av 31 nasjonale raudlisteartar etter 2010-raudlista (gjaldt under rapportskrivinga), av desse er det 103 funn av lav (12 artar), 43 funn av mosar (5 artar), 56 funn av karplanter (4 artar) og 7 funn av sopp (7 artar).
    [Show full text]
  • Data Collection Survey on Promotion of Earthquake Resilient Building Final Report Proposed Target Area
    MINISTRY OF NATIONAL EDUCATION REPUBLIC OF TURKEY DATA COLLECTION SURVEY ON PROMOTION OF EARTHQUAKE RESILIENT BUILDING FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 2020 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY ORIENTAL CONSULTANTS GLOBAL CO., LTD. 7R JR 20-002 MINISTRY OF NATIONAL EDUCATION REPUBLIC OF TURKEY DATA COLLECTION SURVEY ON PROMOTION OF EARTHQUAKE RESILIENT BUILDING FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 2020 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY ORIENTAL CONSULTANTS GLOBAL CO., LTD. Data Collection Survey on Promotion of Earthquake Resilient Building Final Report Proposed Target Area Data Collection Survey on Promotion of Earthquake Resilient Building Final Report Executive Summary 1. Background and Purpose 1.1. Background Turkey is prone to earthquakes, being located in the Anatolian peninsula where the Eurasian Plate, African Plate and Arabic Plate meet. The Government of Turkey has been putting efforts into promoting earthquake-resilient buildings. The continuous cooperation between Japan and Turkey for Disaster Risk Reduction was confirmed at the Japan-Turkey summit meeting in September 2018, and further endorsed by “The Japan-Turkey Memorandum on Disaster Risk Reduction Cooperation” signed on December 27, 2018. Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) performed the “Data Collection Survey for Disaster-Resilient Urban Planning in Turkey” from September 2013 to May 2014, which proposes the concept of developing resilient cities in Turkey. The survey came with the conclusion that public buildings and facilities – such as hospitals and schools – which play important roles during emergency situations should have sufficient seismic capacity required for their purpose. Following the previous survey, JICA started the Data Collection Survey on the Promotion of Earthquake-Resilient Buildings (hereinafter referred to as “the Survey”). 1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • SVR Brosjyre Kart
    VERNEOMRÅDA I Setesdal vesthei, Ryfylkeheiane og Frafjordheiane (SVR) E 134 / Rv 13 Røldal Odda / Hardanger Odda / Hardanger Simlebu E 134 13 Røldal Haukeliseter HORDALAND Sandvasshytta E 134 Utåker Åkra ROGALAND Øvre Sand- HORDALAND Haukeli vatnbrakka TELEMARK Vågslid 520 13 Blomstølen Skånevik Breifonn Haukeligrend E 134 Kvanndalen Oslo SAUDA Holmevatn 9 Kvanndalen Storavassbu Holmevassåno VERNEOMRÅDET Fitjarnuten Etne Sauda Roaldkvam Sandvatnet Sæsvatn Løkjelsvatnhytta Saudasjøen Skaulen Nesflaten Varig verna Sloaros Breivatn Bjåen Mindre verneområdeVinje Svandalen n e VERNEOMRÅDAVERNEOVERNEOMRÅDADA I d forvalta av SVR r o Bleskestadmoen E 134 j Dyrskarnuten f a Ferdselsrestriksjonar: d Maldal Hustveitsåta u Lislevatn NR Bråtveit ROGALAND Vidmyr NR Haugesund Sa Suldalsvatnet Olalihytta AUST-AGDER Lundane Heile året Hovden LVO Hylen Jonstøl Hovden Kalving VINDAFJORD (25. april–31. mai) Sandeid 520 Dyrskarnuten Snønuten Hartevatn 1604 TjørnbrotbuTjø b tb Trekk Hylsfjorden (15. april–20. mai) 46 Vinjarnuten 13 Kvilldal Vikedal Steinkilen Ropeid Suldalsosen Sand Saurdal Dyraheio Holmavatnet Urdevasskilen Turisthytter i SVR SULDAL Krossvatn Vindafjorden Vatnedalsvatnet Berdalen Statsskoghytter Grjotdalsneset Stranddalen Berdalsbu Fjellstyrehytter Breiavad Store Urvatn TOKKE 46 Sandsfjorden Sandsa Napen Blåbergåskilen Reinsvatnet Andre hytter Sandsavatnet 9 Marvik Øvre Moen Krokevasskvæven Vindafjorden Vatlandsvåg Lovraeid Oddatjørn- Vassdalstjørn Gullingen dammen Krokevasshytta BYKLE Førrevass- Godebu 13 dammen Byklestøylane Haugesund Hebnes
    [Show full text]
  • Kyrkjeblad for Hjelmeland, Fister, Årdal, Strand, Jørpeland Og Forsand Sokn Nr.4, Oktober 2020
    Preikestolen Preikestolen Preikestolen Preikestolen KYRKJEBLAD FOR HJELMELAND, FISTER, ÅRDAL, STRAND, JØRPELAND OG FORSAND SOKN NR.4, OKTOBER 2020. 81. ÅRG. Preikestolen for å oppsøkje stader med mange folk? Engstelse, glede, sorg, sinne, Preikestolen Korleis skal me få påfyll i denne takknemlegheit. Han tek imot og Innhald nr. 4-2020: annleis - hausten? Det kan kjennast rommar det. tungt at ting er annleis. Kanskje er det Skund deg og kom ned, sa Jesus til Adresse: fleire spørsmål enn svar? Sakkeus. For i dag vil eg ta inn i ditt Postboks 188 Å forma det heilage................................................................... Side 4 Om me er heime eller ute, så ynskjer hus. Skund deg og kom, seier Jesus til 4126 Jørpeland Altertavla i Forsand kyrkje....................................................... Side 7 Gud å kome oss i møte i livet slik det oss. I dag vil eg ta inn i ditt hus. Sorg og tap................................................................................. Side 8 Neste nummer av Det gode er, ikkje slik det «burde» vere. Preikestolen kjem Ung sorg..................................................................................... Side 10 i postkassen Å dele tro og liv på tvers av generasjoner.............................. Side 12 ca. 01. Pdesember.reikestolen møte Frist for innlevering av Turist-åpen kirke........................................................................ Side 14 stoff er 30. oktober. Et minne fra Badger Iowa......................................................... Side 15 Kyrke i korona-tid.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GEOBIKE [email protected] No
    FYLKESKOMMUNE FYLKESKOMMUNE KOMMUNE KOMMUNE KOMMUNE KOMMUNE KOMMUNE VEST-AGDER ROGALAND SOKNDAL LUND FLEKKEFJORD EIGERSUND BJERKREIM gender equality and local knowledge. local and equality gender geopark.com magma www. history, geohazards, natural resources and climate change, as well as as well as change, climate and resources natural geohazards, history, awareness and understanding of the geological heritage and its its and heritage geological the of understanding and awareness education and sustainable development. Such an area helps raise raise helps area an Such development. sustainable and education international geological importance and which is run for conservation, conservation, for run is which and importance geological international Geopark is a well defned geographical area where the landscape is of of is landscape the where area geographical defned well a is Geopark than 127 geoparks (in 2017) from around the world. A UNESCO Global Global UNESCO A world. the around from 2017) (in geoparks 127 than Magma Geopark is part of UNESCO Global Geoparks, a network of more more of network a Geoparks, Global UNESCO of part is Geopark Magma anorthosite became exposed and is waiting for your footprints. your for waiting is and exposed became anorthosite to the modern Himalayas. When the ice retreated for the last time, the the time, last the for retreated ice the When Himalayas. modern the to geological and cultural features ready to be explored by everyone! by explored be to ready features cultural and geological years ago. It developed in the root zone of a mountain range similar similar range mountain a of zone root the in developed It ago.
    [Show full text]
  • RURITAGE Heritage-Led Regeneration Plans for Replicators
    Ref. Ares(2020)507022 - 27/01/2020 RURITAGE Heritage-led regeneration plans for Replicators D1.4 Due date of deliverable: 31-11-2019 Actual submission date: 27-01-2020 Authors: Hanna Elisabet Åberg, Elisa Conticelli, Claudia de Luca, Angela Santangelo, Simona Tondelli (UNIBO) Authors contributed in the deliverable in the same way, so they are listed in alphabetical order. Call: H2020-SC5-2016-2017 Number: 776465 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 776465 D3.4 / RURITAGE heritage-led regeneration plans for Replicators Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS...................................................................................................................................... 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ....................................................................................................................... 5 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 STRUCTURE OF THE DOCUMENT .................................................................................................................... 9 2. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 12 2.1 OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................................... 12 3. SUMMARY OF THE
    [Show full text]
  • Has Immiscibility Occurred in the Bjerkreim-Sokndal Layered Intrusion (S
    Has immiscibility occurred in the Bjerkreim-Sokndal layered intrusion (S. Norway)? Jean-Clair DUCHESNE Department of Geology, University of Liège, Belgium ABSTRACT The Bjerkreim-Sokndal layered intrusion (Rogaland anorthosite province, South Norway) is made of a series of rocks of intermediate composition that result from fractional crystallization of a jotunite magma (Fe-Ti-rich diorite). The intermediate nature of the liquid line of descent makes possible the action of an immiscibility process that gives rise to conjugated Fe-rich and Si-rich melts. It is particularly plausible at the transition between gabbronorites and mangerite, where Fe-Ti-P-rich ultramafic layers are intercalated into norite and mangerite. The chemical compositions of a suite of rocks in a cross-section of the intrusion are here synthetized and compared to the recent experimental data of Charlier and Grove, 2012. It is shown that the ultramafic layers are do not derive from a Fe-rich immiscible melt. Moreover the reconstructed liquid line of descent of the intrusion by several methods does not enter into the two-immiscible melts domain. It is concluded that evidence of immiscibility in the evolution of the fractionation process is still lacking. KEYWORDS: AMCG, Jotunite, liquid line of descent, Fe-diorite INTRODUCTION Silicate liquid immiscibility has long been invoked as an operating mechanism in the evolution of mafic magmas that differentiate to extreme degrees of Fe-enrichment (McBirney, 1975; Philpotts, 1976; Roedder, 1979). In the Skaergaard layered intrusion, the process, first proposed by McBirney (1975), has received further support by the identification of melt inclusions in apatite (Jakobsen et al., 2005, 2011), late magmatic microstructures (Holness et al., 2011), precious metal occurrence (Nielsen et al., 2015) and compositional evolution (Nielsen et al., in press).
    [Show full text]
  • Analyse Av Gran Hogsten I Hjemeland Kommune
    Skogbruksplan som styringsverktøy for hogst Analyse av områdetakst/skogbruksplan i Egersund, Bjerkreim fra 2013-2018 og Sokndal fra 2012-2018 Innhold 1. Om analysen ................................................................................................................ 2 Grunnlagsdata ............................................................................................................................ 4 Metode ........................................................................................................................................ 5 2. Resultater .................................................................................................................... 7 Generell ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Del 1: Hogstmodenhet og bruk av skogbruksplan ............................................................... 7 Del 2: Eksempel på tap av volum ............................................................................................. 7 Del 3: Kvaliteten på planprodukta ........................................................................................... 9 3. Konklusjon ................................................................................................................... 9 Analysen «Skogbruksplan som styringsverktøy for hogst» er en individuell oppgave under mitt praksisopphold hos Fylkesmannen i Rogaland. Praksisplassen er en del av Bachelor program i skogbruk på høgskolen min (University
    [Show full text]
  • TRANSLATION 1 of 3
    114,, Fisheries Pêches TRANSLATION 31 and Oceans et Océans SERIES NO(S) 4888 1 of 3 CANADIAN TRANSLATION OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES No. 4888 Acid lakes and inland fishing in Norway Results from an interview survey (1974 - 1979) by I.H. Sevaldrud, and I.P. Muniz Original Title: Sure vatn og innlandsfisket i Norge. • Resultater fra intervjuunderseelsene 1974-1979. From: Sur NedbOrs Virkning Pa Skog of Fisk (SNSF-Prosjektet) IR 77/80: 1-203, 1980. Translated by the Translation Bureau (sowF) Multilingual Services Division Department of the Secretary of State of Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Centre St. John's, NFLD 1982 205 pages typescript Secretary Secrétariat of State d'État MULTILINGUAL SERVICES DIVISION — DIVISION DES SERVICES MULTILINGUES TRANSLATION BUREAU BUREAU DES TRADUCT IONS Iffe LIBRARY IDENTIFICATION — FICHE SIGNALÉTIQUE Translated from - Traduction de Into - En Norwegian English Author - Auteur Iver H. Sevaldrud and Ivar Pors Muniz Title in English or French - Titre anglais ou français Acid Lakes and Inland Fishing in Norway. Results from an Interview Survey (1974 - 1979). Title in foreign language (Transliterate foreign characters) Titre en langue étrangère (Transcrire en caractères romains) Sure vatn og innlandsfisket i Norge. Resultater fra intervjuunders$1(e1sene 1974 - 1979 Reference in foreign language (Name of book or publication) in full, transliterate foreign characters. Référence en langue étrangère (Nom du livre ou publication), au complet, transcrire en caractères romains. Sur nedbç4rs virkning pa skog of fisk (SNSF-prosjektet) Reference in English or French - Référence en anglais ou français • 4eicid Precipitation - Effects on Forest and Fish (the SNSF-project) Publisher - Editeur Page Numbers in original DATE OF PUBLICATION Numéros des pages dans SNSF Project, Box 61, DATE DE PUBLICATION l'original Norway 1432 Aas-NHL, 203 Year Issue No.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative and Statistical Areas English Version – SOSI Standard 4.0
    Administrative and statistical areas English version – SOSI standard 4.0 Administrative and statistical areas Norwegian Mapping Authority [email protected] Norwegian Mapping Authority June 2009 Page 1 of 191 Administrative and statistical areas English version – SOSI standard 4.0 1 Applications schema ......................................................................................................................7 1.1 Administrative units subclassification ....................................................................................7 1.1 Description ...................................................................................................................... 14 1.1.1 CityDistrict ................................................................................................................ 14 1.1.2 CityDistrictBoundary ................................................................................................ 14 1.1.3 SubArea ................................................................................................................... 14 1.1.4 BasicDistrictUnit ....................................................................................................... 15 1.1.5 SchoolDistrict ........................................................................................................... 16 1.1.6 <<DataType>> SchoolDistrictId ............................................................................... 17 1.1.7 SchoolDistrictBoundary ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Les Hele Rapporten
    FORVALTNINGSREVISJON AV KVALITET I ELDREOMSORGEN EIGERSUND KOMMUNE - MAI 2019 Rogaland Revisjon IKS INNHOLD Innhold .................................................................................................................. 3 Sammendrag ........................................................................................................ 4 Rådmannens kommentar ................................................................................ 10 Rapporten ........................................................................................................... 11 1 Innledning ........................................................................................... 12 1.1 Formål og problemstillinger ............................................................. 12 1.2 Revisjonskriterier og metode ............................................................ 13 2 Faktabeskrivelse .................................................................................. 16 2.1 Innledning ........................................................................................... 16 2.2 Status for de viktigste forebyggende og helsefremmende tiltakene ............................................................................................... 16 2.3 Tilrettelegging for å virkeliggjøre kommunens mål...................... 35 2.4 Forhold som kan svekke implementeringen av kommunens mål ........................................................................................................ 41 2.5 Resultater ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Avfallsforskrift for Kommunene Bjerkreim, Eigersund Og Sokndal
    AVFALLSFORSKRIFT FOR KOMMUNENE BJERKREIM, EIGERSUND OG SOKNDAL Forskriften er fastsatt av kommunene i medhold av Lov av 13.mars 1981 nr.6 om vern mot forurensninger og om avfall, § 30, 31 og 34. Denne forskrift trer i kraft fra 1.1.1999 og erstatter tidligere vedtatte avfalls- /renovasjonsforskrifter i kommunene. Iverksetting av nye ordninger skjer etter vedtak i DIM’s styre. Vedtatt av DIM’s styre 15.10.1998 1 INNHOLD § 1 Formål. § 2 Definisjoner. § 3 Generelle bestemmelser. § 4 Renovasjon av forbruksavfall fra boliger og virksomheter. § 5 Renovasjon av forbruksavfall fra hytter og fritidshus. § 6 Renovasjon av matavfall fra storkjøkken og matvarehandel. § 7 Renovasjon av slamavfall fra boliger, hytter/fritidshus og virksomheter. 2 § 1 Formål. Formålet med denne forskrift er å sikre at avfallshåndteringen i kommunene Bjerkreim, Eigersund og Sokndal forgår på en god ressurs- og miljømessig måte i samsvar med lover og forskrifter, fra avfallet oppstår hos den enkelte abonnent til avlevering hos gjenvinningsbedrift eller anbringelse i deponi. Det skal legges vekt på miljømessig god drift i alle ledd i avfallsbehandlingen. § 2 Definisjoner. Med forkortelsen DIM menes i denne forskrift Dalane Interkommunale Miljøverk. Med avfall forstås i denne forskrift kasserte løsøregjenstander eller stoffer. Som avfall regnes også overflødige løsøregjenstander fra tjenesteyting, produksjon og renseanlegg mv. Avfallet inndeles i hovedgruppene forbruksavfall, produksjonsavfall og spesialavfall. Som forbruksavfall regnes vanlig husholdningsavfall, herunder også større gjenstander som møbler, inventar og utstyr, fra boliger, mindre butikker og kontorer. Som produksjonsavfall regnes avfall fra næringsvirksomhet og tjenesteyting som i art og mengde atskiller seg vesentlig fra forbruksavfall. Som spesialavfall regnes avfall som ikke hensiktsmessig kan behandles med forbruksavfall på grunn av sin størrelse eller fordi det kan medføre alvorlige forurensninger eller fare for skade på mennesker eller dyr.
    [Show full text]