DOCSLIB.ORG

RURITAGE Heritage-Led Regeneration Plans for Replicators

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RURITAGE Heritage-Led Regeneration Plans for Replicators Ref. Ares(2020)507022 - 27/01/2020 RURITAGE Heritage-led regeneration plans for Replicators D1.4 Due date of deliverable: 31-11-2019 Actual submission date: 27-01-2020 Authors: Hanna Elisabet Åberg, Elisa Conticelli, Claudia de Luca, Angela Santangelo, Simona Tondelli (UNIBO) Authors contributed in the deliverable in the same way, so they are listed in alphabetical order. Call: H2020-SC5-2016-2017 Number: 776465 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 776465 D3.4 / RURITAGE heritage-led regeneration plans for Replicators Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS...................................................................................................................................... 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ....................................................................................................................... 5 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 STRUCTURE OF THE DOCUMENT .................................................................................................................... 9 2. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 12 2.1 OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................................... 12 3. SUMMARY OF THE CO-DEVELOPMENT PHASE ....................................................................................... 13 3.1 RURAL HERITAGE HUB: THE LAUNCH EVENT .................................................................................................. 13 3.2 THE SERIOUS GAME WORKSHOP ................................................................................................................. 14 3.3 THE PARTICIPATORY WORKSHOP ................................................................................................................. 14 3.4 THE BUSINESS MODEL WORKSHOP .............................................................................................................. 15 3.5 THE ROUND TABLE WITH KEY STAKEHOLDERS ................................................................................................. 16 4. COLLABORATION AMONG RS, RMS AND KFPS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLANS ........................ 17 5. MONITORING OF THE PLANS ................................................................................................................. 19 6. KARAVANKE/KARAWANKEN UNESCO GLOBAL GEOPARK (ARGE GK) HERITAGE-LED REGENERATION PLAN 20 6.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................... 21 6.1.1 THE REFERENCE SIA ......................................................................................................................................... 23 6.1.2 OTHER RELEVANT SIAS ...................................................................................................................................... 24 6.1.3 THE REPLICATOR BASELINE ................................................................................................................................. 26 6.1.4 THE MAIN CHALLENGES ..................................................................................................................................... 26 6.2 OVERALL OBJECTIVES OF THE PLAN .............................................................................................................. 27 6.3 OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN .................................................................. 28 6.3.1 THE ACTIONS IN DETAIL ..................................................................................................................................... 29 6.3.2 TIMELINE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION .................................................................................................................. 37 6.4 RISKS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN ............................................................................................... 38 7. MAGMA UNESCO GLOBAL GEOPARK (MAGMA UGG) HERITAGE-LED REGENERATION PLAN .................... 39 7.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................... 40 7.1.1 THE REFERENCE SIA ......................................................................................................................................... 41 7.1.2 OTHER RELEVANT SIAS ...................................................................................................................................... 41 7.1.3 THE REPLICATOR BASELINE ................................................................................................................................. 42 7.1.4 THE MAIN CHALLENGES ..................................................................................................................................... 43 7.2 OVERALL OBJECTIVES OF THE PLAN .............................................................................................................. 44 7.3 OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN .................................................................. 44 7.3.1 THE ACTIONS IN DETAIL ..................................................................................................................................... 45 7.3.2 TIMELINE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION .................................................................................................................. 53 7.4 RISKS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN ............................................................................................... 54 2 D3.4 / RURITAGE heritage-led regeneration plans for Replicators 8. GEO-NATURPARK BERGSTRAßE-ODENWALD UNESCO GLOBAL GEOPARK (GEO-N) HERITAGE-LED REGENERATION PLAN .................................................................................................................................. 56 8.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................... 57 8.1.1 THE REFERENCE SIA ......................................................................................................................................... 58 8.1.2 OTHER RELEVANT SIAS ...................................................................................................................................... 58 8.1.3 THE REPLICATOR BASELINE ................................................................................................................................. 59 8.1.4 THE MAIN CHALLENGES ..................................................................................................................................... 60 8.2 OVERALL OBJECTIVES OF THE PLAN .............................................................................................................. 61 8.3 OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN .................................................................. 64 8.3.1 THE ACTIONS IN DETAIL ..................................................................................................................................... 65 8.3.2 TIMELINE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION .................................................................................................................. 80 8.4 RISKS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN ............................................................................................... 81 9. NEGOVA CASTLE (KIBLA, KULTPROTUR) HERITAGE-LED REGENERATION PLAN ........................................ 83 9.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................... 84 9.1.1 THE REFERENCE SIA ......................................................................................................................................... 85 9.1.2 OTHER RELEVANT SIAS ...................................................................................................................................... 85 9.1.3 THE REPLICATOR BASELINE ................................................................................................................................. 86 9.1.4 THE MAIN CHALLENGES ..................................................................................................................................... 87 9.2 OVERALL OBJECTIVES OF THE PLAN .............................................................................................................. 88 9.3 OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN .................................................................. 89 9.3.1 THE ACTIONS IN DETAIL ..................................................................................................................................... 89 9.3.2 TIMELINE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION .................................................................................................................. 99 9.4 RISKS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN ............................................................................................. 100 10. APPIGNANO DEL TRONTO (COAPP) HERITAGE-LED REGENERATION PLAN ........................................... 101 10.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2Nd Report by the Republic of Austria
    Strasbourg, 1 December 2006 ACFC/SR/II(2006)008 [English only] SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY AUSTRIA PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Received on 1 December 2006 ACFC/SR/II(2006)008 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I...................................................................................................................................5 I.1. General Remarks..............................................................................................................5 I.2. Comments on the Questions and the Resolution of the Council of Europe ........................7 PART II ...............................................................................................................................17 II.1. The Situation of the National Minorities in Austria .......................................................17 II.1.1. The History of the National Minorities .......................................................................18 The Croat minority in Burgenland ........................................................................................18 The Slovene minority ...........................................................................................................19 The Hungarian minority .......................................................................................................21 The Czech minority..............................................................................................................21 The Slovak minority.............................................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Kommunale Steuern Im Landkreis Darmstadt
    Bund der Steuerzahler Hessen e.V. Mai 2019 Kommunale Steuern im Landkreis Darmstadt - Dieburg im Jahr 2019 Hebesatz in Prozent (Veränderung zu 2018) Grundsteuer Hundesteuer Spiel- Straßenbeiträge Defizitärer Haushalt Gewerbe- Pferde- Vergnügungs- Kulturförder- Wettauf- Zweitwoh- Verabschie- Stadt/Gemeinde Für gefährliche apparate- wiederkeh- steuer 1. Hund steuer steuer abgabe wandsteuer nungsteuer einmalig 2018 2019 dung A B Hunde steuer rend Alsbach-Hähnlein 380 365 365 60,00 360,00 nein ja nein nein nein ja [10%] ja nein ja ja ja Babenhausen 390 370 495 60,00 nein nein ja nein nein nein ja [10%] nein ja nein nein ja Bickenbach 400(+20) 400(+65) 425(+95) 40,00 500,00 nein ja nein nein nein nein ja nein ja ja ja Dieburg 380 450 450 54,00 504,00 nein ja nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein ja Eppertshausen 350 0 365(+45) 48,00 600,00 nein ja nein nein nein nein ja nein ja ja ja Erzhausen 380 300 450 48,00 600,00 nein ja nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein ja Fischbachtal 380 340 390 48,00 600,00 nein ja nein nein nein nein ja nein nein nein ja Griesheim 390 595 595 54,00 nein nein ja nein nein nein nein nein ja nein nein ja Groß-Bieberau 385 350 490 48,00 600,00 nein ja nein nein nein nein nein ja ja nein ja Groß-Umstadt 380 340 525 42,00 504,00 nein ja nein nein ja nein nein nein nein nein ja Groß-Zimmern 380 350 350 48,00 600,00 nein ja nein nein nein nein ja nein* nein nein ja Messel 380 390 507(+87) 54,00 600,00 nein ja nein nein nein nein nein ja nein nein ja Modautal 380 400 400 60,00 600,00 nein nein nein nein nein ja [10%]
    [Show full text]
  • GEOBIKE [email protected] No
    FYLKESKOMMUNE FYLKESKOMMUNE KOMMUNE KOMMUNE KOMMUNE KOMMUNE KOMMUNE VEST-AGDER ROGALAND SOKNDAL LUND FLEKKEFJORD EIGERSUND BJERKREIM gender equality and local knowledge. local and equality gender geopark.com magma www. history, geohazards, natural resources and climate change, as well as as well as change, climate and resources natural geohazards, history, awareness and understanding of the geological heritage and its its and heritage geological the of understanding and awareness education and sustainable development. Such an area helps raise raise helps area an Such development. sustainable and education international geological importance and which is run for conservation, conservation, for run is which and importance geological international Geopark is a well defned geographical area where the landscape is of of is landscape the where area geographical defned well a is Geopark than 127 geoparks (in 2017) from around the world. A UNESCO Global Global UNESCO A world. the around from 2017) (in geoparks 127 than Magma Geopark is part of UNESCO Global Geoparks, a network of more more of network a Geoparks, Global UNESCO of part is Geopark Magma anorthosite became exposed and is waiting for your footprints. your for waiting is and exposed became anorthosite to the modern Himalayas. When the ice retreated for the last time, the the time, last the for retreated ice the When Himalayas. modern the to geological and cultural features ready to be explored by everyone! by explored be to ready features cultural and geological years ago. It developed in the root zone of a mountain range similar similar range mountain a of zone root the in developed It ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Kärnten, Austria, Download Unter Carinthia II M 192./112
    ©Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein für Kärnten, Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Carinthia II M 192./112. Jahrgang J Seiten 487-510 M Klagenfurt 2002 487 Zum Landschaftswandel in Unter- kärnten - Das „Landschaftsfenster Feistritz ob Bleiburg 1830-2020 Von Michael JUNGMEIER & Judith DRAPELA Schlagworte: Key words: Landschaftswandel, Kulturlandschaft, Landnutzung, Regionalentwicklung. Landscape change, cultural landscape, landuse, regional Zusammenfassung: development. Im vorliegenden Beitrag wird die Landschaftsentwicklung des südkärntner Grenzraumes am Beispiel der Gemeinde Feistritz ob Bleiburg (Bezirk Völker- Summary: markt) analysiert. Ausgehend von der Situation vor der Industrialisierung The paper focuses on the changes (1830) wird die Entwicklung der Landschaft bis heute nachvollzogen und die of a cultural landscape in the South weitere Entwicklung bis zum Jahr 2020 prognostiziert. Die Bearbeitung er- of Carinthia by example of the com- folgt mit dem Analysetool „Landschaftsfenster". munity Freistritz ob Bleiburg (district Für den konkreten Landschaftsausschnitt in Feistritz ob Bleiburg ist die cha- of Völkermarkt). Beginning from the rakteristische „Schere" von Intensivierung der Gunstlagen und Extensivie- pre-industrialised situation in the rung bzw. Aufgabe der Ungunstlagen zu konstatieren. Dies bedeutet in den 1830ies the change of the land- randlichen Lagen das Zurückweichen von Acker- und Grünland zugunsten scape until nowadays is being des Waldes. In den Gunstlagen ist eine Intensivierung des Ackerbaus sowie analyzed; the further development eine dramatische Zunahme von versiegelten Flächen festzustellen. Ver- up to 2020 is forecasted. The ana- zeichnenswert ist jedoch, dass die Grundstruktur der Talbodenlandschaft lysis is carried out by the methods seit fast zwei Jahrhunderten nahezu unverändert ist. of „Landscape-windows". Generell muss ein Rückgang an Nutzungsarten und Nutzungsintensitäten For the landscape of Feistritz ob festgestellt werden.
    [Show full text]
  • The Slovene Carinthians and the 1920 Plebiscite
    SPRAWY NARODOWOŚCIOWE Seria nowa / naTiOnaliTIES AFFairs New series, 48/2016: 85–105 DOI: 10.11649/sn.2016.006 Maria isabella reinhard “an isOlaTed Case”*: The slOvene CarinThians and The 1920 PlebisCiTe absTraCT The end of WWI saw the dissolution of the multiethnic Cen- tral European Empires and the formation of new states based on Woodrow Wilson’s concept of national self-determination. This article underlines the limitations of Wilsonian national self-determination, focusing on the Slovene Carinthians and the pro-Austrian result of the 1920 plebiscite. The outcome of the plebiscite exemplifies that minorities are motivated by more than solely ethno-linguistic reasons when deciding what state to belong to. Even though other factors existed, the key motivations for Slovene Carinthians to remain with Austria were of economic and political nature. It will be con- tended that the importance of the centuries long accultura- tion of Slovene Carinthians to Austria brought them closer to Austria than to the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. Additionally the phrasing of the plebiscite made Slovene Car- inthians’ decision a question of state preference rather than ethno-linguistic identity. Moreover, the unpleasant occupation of parts of Carinthia by the troops of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes and the higher effectiveness of Austri- an propaganda played a key role in the vote of many Slovene Carinthians. Lastly, the majority of Slovene Carinthians being farmers, reliant on Austrian trade opportunities, swayed them ............................... toward a pro-Austrian vote. Thus, the Carinthian plebiscite of Maria isabella reinhard 1920 builds a strong case against the assumption that ethno- University of St Andrews, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Portrait of the Regions – Slovenia Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities 2000 – VIII, 80 Pp
    PORTRAIT OF THE REGIONS 13 17 KS-29-00-779-EN-C PORTRAIT OF THE REGIONS VOLUME 9 SLOVENIA VOLUME 9 SLOVENIA Price (excluding VAT) in Luxembourg: ECU 25,00 ISBN 92-828-9403-7 OFFICE FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES EUROPEAN COMMISSION L-2985 Luxembourg ࢞ eurostat Statistical Office of the European Communities PORTRAIT OF THE REGIONS VOLUME 9 SLOVENIA EUROPEAN COMMISSION ࢞ I eurostat Statistical Office of the European Communities A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2000 ISBN 92-828-9404-5 © European Communities, 2000 Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Belgium II PORTRAIT OF THE REGIONS eurostat Foreword The accession discussions already underway with all ten of the Phare countries of Central and Eastern Europe have further boosted the demand for statistical data concerning them. At the same time, a growing appreciation of regional issues has raised interest in regional differences in each of these countries. This volume of the “Portrait of the Regions” series responds to this need and follows on in a tradition which has seen four volumes devoted to the current Member States, a fifth to Hungary, a sixth volume dedicated to the Czech Republic and Poland, a seventh to the Slovak Republic and the most recent volume covering the Baltic States, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Examining the 12 statistical regions of Slovenia, this ninth volume in the series has an almost identical structure to Volume 8, itself very similar to earlier publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Utilization of Communal Autonomy for Implementing Additional Bilingual Names of Populated Places and Streets in Carinthia (Austria)
    GEGN.2/2021/71/CRP.71 15 March 2021 English United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names Second session New York, 3 to 7 May 2021 Item 12 of the provisional agenda * Geographical names as culture, heritage and identity, including indigenous, minority and regional languages and multilingual issues Utilization of communal autonomy for implementing additional bilingual names of populated places and streets in Carinthia (Austria) Submitted by Austria ** Summary An improved political climate between the German-speaking majority and the minority of Slovenes in the Austrian Province of Carinthia now allows the utilization of communal autonomy (a principle of the Constitution) to implement additional bilingual town signs and new bilingual street names. While that possibility always existed, implementation was not previously possible because the German-speaking majority in all bilingual communes but one would not have passed such a decision in favour of the minority. Now, the opportunity to implement bilingual place names in addition to the 164 defined in amendment No. 46/2011 to the National Minorities Act has been used by three communes in various ways. Experience has shown that the introduction of street names replacing bilingual names of populated places poses new challenges to bilingual communes. The recommendations of the Austrian Board on Geographical Names regarding the naming of urban traffic areas in 2017 (see E/CONF.105/21 and E/CONF.105/21/CRP.21) referred explicitly to the value of using field names and/or other traditional local names when applying new names. Those recommendations contributed to the conservation of traditional local place names of the minority as street names.
    [Show full text]
  • Tilþtüulúlettüel
    tilþtüulÚlEttüEl ur EllEt tE lll rü lü u tlt tg l{ El lÉl üEl \ \ 71 '.1 = \ \ a Örtliches Entwicklungskonzept Stadtgemeinde Bleiburg Überarbeitung 2013 VERFASSER LAGLER, WURZER & KNAPPINGER ZIVILTECHNIKER-GMBH Europastraße 8 9524 Villach PROJEKTLEITUNG Mag. Helmut WURZER Bearbeitung: Stand: Juli 2013 PROJEKTTITEL Örtliches Entwicklungskonzept der Stadtgemeinde Bleiburg – Überarbeitung 2013 Projektleitung und Mag. Helmut WURZER -durchführung Staatlich befugter und beeideter Ingenieurkonsulent für Geographie LWK Lagler, Wurzer & Knappinger Ziviltechniker GmbH Europastraße 8 9524 Villach Telefon: +43 (0)4242 - 23323-0 E-Mail: [email protected] Homepage: www.l-w-k.at Auftraggeber Stadtgemeinde Bleiburg 10. Oktober Platz 1 9150 Bleiburg Telefon: +43 (0)4235 - 2110-0 Fax: +43 (0)4235 - 2110-22 E-Mail: [email protected] Digitale Daten Kärntner Geographisches Informationssystem (KAGIS) Amt der Kärntner Landesregierung Flatschacherstraße 70 9020 Klagenfurt am Wörthersee Telefon: +43 (0)50 536 - 18356 Fax: +43 (0)50 536 - 18300 E-Mail: [email protected] Aufsichtsbehörde Amt der Kärntner Landesregierung Abt 3 Kompetenzzentrum Landesentwicklung und Gemeinden Mießtaler Straße 1 9021 Klagenfurt am Wörthersee Telefon: +43 (0)50 536 - 13002 Fax: +43 (0)50 536 - 13000 E-Mail: [email protected] Inhaltsverzeichnis Stadtgemeinde Bleiburg INHALTSVERZEICHNIS 1 VORBEMERKUNGEN .......................................................................................... 9 1.1 DER LEITBILDGEDANKE ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Juni Bis August 2021
    Kirche im Fischbachtal Ausgabe 3 Billings · Lichtenberg · Meßbach · Niedernhausen · Nonrod · Steinau 2021 Nachrichten der evangelisch-lutherischen Kirchengemeinde Juni bis Niedernhausen, der Gemeinde Fischbachtal sowie der Ortsvereine August Aus dem Inhalt: Termine und Kontaktdaten 2 Gott ist nicht ferne von Geistliches Wort 3 einem jeden unter uns. Kirchenvorstands- wahlen 5 Denn in ihm leben, Rückblick 6 weben und sind wir. Gottesdienste 12 Apg 17,27 Danksagungen 14 Kasualien 15 Spendenaufruf 16 Pilgertag 17 Bücherei 18 Monatsspruch Juli 2021 www.kirche-im-fischbachtal.de Kirche im Fischbachtal · Ausgabe 3 · Juni bis August 2021 Ev. öffentliche Gemeindebücherei: Öffnungszeiten Pfarrbüro: E-Mail: [email protected] Gemeindesekretärin: Gerlinde Kredel Zur Zeit ist die Gemeindebücherei für Di. 10–12 Uhr, Do. 16–18 Uhr den Besucherverkehr geschlossen. Zur Zeit ist das Gemeindebüro für den Be- Änderungen werden auf der Homepage sucherverkehr geschlossen. Änderungen und per Aushang im Schaukasten werden auf der Homepage und per Aus- bekannt gegeben. Unter fischbachtal- hang im Schaukasten bekannt gegeben. evangelisch.de -> Gemeindegruppen Kontakt per E-Mail: kirchengemeinde. ->Gemeindebuecherei kann die Ausleihe [email protected] oder online erfolgen, die Bücher werden telefonisch 06166-424 (Öffnungszeiten). kostenfrei und kontaktlos ausgeliefert. Sprechstunden von Pfarrer Körber: Kirchenchor: Nach Vereinbarung unter 06166-920599. Montag, 20 Uhr, im Gemeindehaus Montags ist das Pfarramt geschlossen. E-Mail: [email protected] Konfirmandenunterricht: nach Vereinbarung Diakoniestation Groß-Bieberau: Sudetenstr. 1, 64401 Groß-Bieberau Posaunenchor: Telefon 06162 84203 Dienstag im Ev. Gemeindehaus [email protected] 19.00 Uhr Jungbläser Bürozeiten: 8.00 – 12.00 Uhr 20.00 Uhr Bläserprobe https://epc-hause.jimdo.com Küsterin (Niedernhausen & Lichtenberg): Zwetelina Stamenoff, Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Bleiburg —The Myth
    Bleiburg —the myth. On the history and current relevance of the Ustaša-Meeting in Kärnten/Carinthia/Koroška SUPPORTED BY CO-EDITOR Additionally thanks to the following student representative groups: Fakultätsvertretung GEWI, IG PoWi, StV|BaGru_Soziologie, IGGerm, StRV/IG-Geschichte, Roter Vektor Mathematik, Roter Vektor Physik, Roter Börsenkrach. IMPRINT www.no-ustasa.at [email protected] AK Bleiburg/Pliberk. /AK-BleiburgPliberk Wien/Dunaj, April 2019. @noustasa_at Table of contents Introduction Page 04 Brief historical summary Page 06 The Myth of Bleiburg Page 16 From Field to Pilgrimage Site Page 22 The Protagonists Page 26 The Austrian Authorities and the Ustaša-Meeting Page 32 Symbols of Croatian Fascism Page 40 Glossary Page 48 »The ground on which the monument stands today was given by the Loibach farmers to the Ustaši. Most of them were Nazis. The farmers, who were not, nevertheless arranged about 100 meters of path and graveled it so that they could reach the monument with the cars.« - Pavla Apovnik, contemporary witness from Bleiburg/Pliberk 4 For years, the historical revisionist and, above all, annoyed them, the meeting commemoration of the Loibach Field/ nevertheless fundamentally remains what Libuško polje at Bleiburg/Pliberk has been it was. The devotional items are now sold observed and is the subject of anti-fascist in the parking lot, the beer is drunk in criticism. This attracted only marginal advance and the T-shirts with the forbidden attention despite the size of the meeting. symbols are simply turned inside out. It is After all, we live in Austria. In 2015 - the and remains one of the largest right-wing anniversary year of the events in Bleiburg/ extremist meetings in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Installateurverzeichnis Des ZVG Dieburg
    Installateurverzeichnis des ZVG Dieburg Firma PLZ Ort Straße Telefon Handy / Fax E-Mail Homepage Baer Heizung, Sanitär, Solar - Oliver Müller 64832 Babenhausen Ziegelhüttenstraße 53 06073 61789 info@baer-sanitär.de Heinold Heizung und Sanitär GmbH 64832 Babenhausen Hinter der Altdörfer Kirche 28 06073 5414 06073 62738 [email protected] www.sicherheitdurchfacharbeit.de Kohlbacher Haustechnik GmbH 64747 Breuberg Hermann-Löns-Straße 3 06163 3587 06163 6915 [email protected] Hoffmann Heizungsbau Sanitär Elektro Solar 64807 Dieburg Werner-v.-Siemens-Str. 8 06071 5906 06071 9899200 [email protected] Giede - Fachmarkt Heizung und Sanitär 64807 Dieburg Minnefeld 6 06071 22785-6 06071 81597 [email protected] www.giede-heizung.de Ludwig Scharf - Sanitär und Heizungen 64859 Eppertshausen Hauptstraße 39 06071 31673 06071 34006 Roos Heizung Lüftung Klima Bad 64859 Eppertshausen Hauptstraße 91 06071 613300 06071 613301 [email protected] Pektas - Heizung Sanitär Kundendienst 64401 Groß Bieberau Marktstraße 6 06162 82109 06162 84787 [email protected] www.pektas.de Röhnke Groß Umstadt/ Sanitär Heizung 64823 Klein Umstadt Bahnhofstraße 35a 06078 72936 06078 73511 [email protected] www.roehnke.com Uwe Flauaus Groß-Umstadt/ Heizung-Sanitär-Kundendienst 64823 Richen Dorfstraße 2 06078 919855 0160 97073067 [email protected] www.heizung-flauaus.de Gerhard Groß - Gas- u. Wasserinstallationen 64846 Groß Zimmern Johannes-Ohl-Straße 26 06071 43594 06071 739670 [email protected] Poth GmbH, Elektro-, Gas- und Sanitärinstallation, Bauspenglerei 64846 Groß Zimmern Reinheimer Straße 21 06071 4662 06071 71683 [email protected] 06073 688530 Meisterbetrieb Wetzel 64832 Hergershausen Gartenstraße 5 0178 7633017 [email protected] www.wetzel.de Firma Aquanova - Dragan Opacak 65779 Kelkheim Hattersheimer Str.
    [Show full text]
  • KREIS KZ EMEINDE K NAME Referenz 411 000 DARMSTADT
    KREIS_KZ EMEINDE_K NAME Referenz 411 000 DARMSTADT, STADT 28991400009301 412 000 FRANKFURT AM MAIN, STADT 28991400009302 413 000 OFFENBACH AM MAIN, STADT 28991400009303 414 000 WIESBADEN, LANDESHAUPTSTADT 28991400009304 431 001 ABTSTEINACH 28991400009305 431 002 BENSHEIM, STADT 28991400009306 431 003 BIBLIS 28991400009307 431 004 BIRKENAU 28991400009308 431 005 BÜRSTADT, STADT 28991400009309 431 006 EINHAUSEN 28991400009310 431 007 FÜRTH 28991400009311 431 008 GORXHEIMERTAL 28991400009312 431 009 GRASELLENBACH 28991400009313 431 010 GROSS -ROHRHEIM 28991400009314 HEPPENHEIM (BERGSTRASSE), 431 011 KREISSTADT 28991400009315 431 012 HIRSCHHORN (NECKAR), STADT 28991400009316 431 013 LAMPERTHEIM, STADT 28991400009317 431 014 LAUTERTAL (ODENWALD) 28991400009318 431 015 LINDENFELS, STADT 28991400009319 431 016 LORSCH, STADT 28991400009320 431 017 MÖRLENBACH 28991400009321 431 018 NECKARSTEINACH, STADT 28991400009322 431 019 RIMBACH 28991400009323 431 020 VIERNHEIM, STADT 28991400009324 431 021 WALD -MICHELBACH 28991400009325 431 022 ZWINGENBERG, STADT 28991400009326 432 001 ALSBACH -HÄHNLEIN 28991400009327 432 002 BABENHAUSEN, STADT 28991400009328 432 003 BICKENBACH 28991400009329 432 004 DIEBURG, STADT 28991400009330 432 005 EPPERTSHAUSEN 28991400009331 432 006 ERZHAUSEN 28991400009332 432 007 FISCHBACHTAL 28991400009333 432 008 GRIESHEIM, STADT 28991400009334 432 009 GROSS -BIEBERAU, STADT 28991400009335 432 010 GROSS -UMSTADT, STADT 28991400009336 432 011 GROSS -ZIMMERN 28991400009337 432 012 MESSEL 28991400009338 432 013 MODAUTAL 28991400009339
    [Show full text]