(A) – Personal Details

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(A) – Personal Details Component-I (A) – Personal details: Prof. P. Bhaskar Reddy Sri Venkateswara University,Tirupati Prof.Ravi Korisettar VS Wakankar Archaeological Research Institute Bhopal Dr. Rajesh S.V. University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram Prof. P. Ajithprasad The M.S. University of Baroda 1 Component-I (B) – Description of module: Subject Name Indian Culture Paper Name Pre and Protohistoric Cultures of India Module Name/Title Prehistory of India and Pakistan I : Development of Indus Civilization-Ceramic Traditions Module Id I C / PPHCI / 18 Pre requisites Objectives To understand the characteristic features and cultural changes that shaped the Indus Civilization from the beginning of Regionalization Era to the end of Integration Era Keywords Indus Civilization, Regionalization Era, Integration Era, Localization Era E-text (Quadrant-I): 1. Introduction Many settlements of the Indus Civilization are located in the areas well beyond the Indus river valley and therefore the civilization is referred to as civilization of the Greater Indus valley or Indus- Sarasvati Civilization. The Greater Indus Region extends from Shortugai in Afghanistan in the north to Daimabad on the banks of the Pravara in western India (Maharashtra). Its western boundary is marked by Sutkagen Dor whereas Manpur marks its eastern limit. With more than 2500 known sites spread across a landscape measuring over 1 million square kilometers, the Indus Civilization is the most geographically expansive state‐level society in the ancient world. This Civilization can be dated from c. 2600 BCE to 1900 BCE. In order to define various cultural changes that occurred during the Indus Civilization; diverse terminologies emerged over a period of time as more number of researchers worked in separate geographical areas of the greater Indus region. These researchers felt that each stage of change needs to be defined separately so as to understand the origin, development, changes and decline of the Indus Civilization. They also felt that the process of cultural change within the greater Indus region is the result of an amalgamation of several traits from its various sub-regions. This led to a great diversity in its nomenclature, which now arouses confusion. Therefore, it is necessary to define these terminologies and bring them under relevant cultural terms indicative of the processes. The terms Regionalization Era, Integration Era and Localization Era are in use for assessing the development of the Indus Civilization. These terminologies are adopted from Shaffer and Lichtenstein, who proposed these terms supported by the radiocarbon dates from several sites distributed across the greater Indus region, assigning it as a product of interactive network among the ‘contemporary ethnic communities’ of that period within the region who shared several common traits and at the same time maintained their identity. Thus, the cultures referred to as Pre-Harappan or Proto-Harappan or Antecedent Harappan or Pre-Urban Harappan or Early Harappan or Early Indus Culture or Pre- Early Indus or Pre-Early Harappa or Pre-Pre-Harappa Culture are described under the Regionalization Era (c. 5000 – 2600 BCE), while Mature Harappan or Classical Harappan or Urban Harappan or Sindhi Harappan or Harappan are placed within the Integration Era (c. 2600 – 1900 BCE) and Late Harappan or Post-Urban Harappan or Post Harappan are grouped under the Localization Era (c. 1900 – 1000 BCE). 2 2. Objectives In this chapter, we will briefly describe the characteristic features and cultural changes that occurred during the Indus Civilization from the beginning of Regionalization Era to the end of Integration Era. This chapter will incorporate details of various ceramics traditions existing in Greater Indus region. 3. Regionalization Era During the Regionalization Era (c. 5000-2600 BCE), inhabitants of the Greater Indus region were organized into several regional cultures distinguishable from one another on the basis of pottery as well as other aspects of material culture. During this era, the inhabitants developed subsistence systems, interregional interaction networks, technological capabilities, and social hierarchies necessary for the emergence of urban state-level society. The regional phases located in the Amri- Nal Phase in Sindh and Baluchistan, Kot Diji Phase in Punjab and Cholistan, Sothi-Siswal Phase in Punjab and Haryana have the earliest evidence of the technological and social preconditions of the Integration Era i.e. diverse and abundant subsistence and resource base, establishment of socio‐economic interaction systems that link resource areas, the technological expertise and capacity to fulfill the needs of both urban and state level society, and mechanisms for establishing and reinforcing status differentiation or social hierarchies. Regional social complexity and the emergence of social hierarchies are reflected in the growth of small Regionalization Era agro‐pastoral settlements into villages and large towns during Integration Era. A pattern of wealth creation based on control of technology and distribution of finished products was also established during this era. Archaeological researches in North Gujarat, Saurashtra and Kachchh regions also provide evidence for the independent establishment of villages and towns during this period. Excavations at Harappa have confirmed a clear and gradual evolution of Classical Harappan material culture and social practice from the earliest Ravi-Hakra Phase and later Kot-Diji Phase. This continuous developmental trajectory at Harappa clearly shows that Punjab was the core area of urban emergence. There are different phases that make up the Regionalization Era: Bhurj Basket Marked Phase, Togau Phase, Kechi Beg Phase, Hakra Ware Phase, Amri-Nal Phase, Kot Dijian Phas, Sothi-Siswal Phase and Damb Sadaat Phase. 3.1 Bhurj Basket Marked Phase It represents the beginning of village farming communities, pastoral camps and introduction of ceramics in Mehrgarh in Baluchistan during c.5000-4300 BCE. The first occupation at Mehrgarh represented by the archaeological Period IA is aceramic or pre-pottery. The first ceramics of Period IB of Mehrgarh were soft, buff, chaff tempered and handmade. The shapes were simple and probably intended to meet the immediate needs. To some extent these shapes had similarities with those from the sites on the Iranian Plateau. From Mehrgarh IIA, ceramics are known from domestic context. The shapes are incipient forms of basins, bowls, pots and jars. The technology employed for their production is named as slabbing. Studies on Mehrgarh pottery also point to the evolution of techniques from basketry. Wheel made pottery appears from Mehrgarh IIB, at times expanded by using paddle and anvil. Compartmented buildings were constructed during the Bhurj Basket Marked Phase. 3.2 Togau Phase It is a period of significant growth in population and number of settlements. 84 sites of this Phase (c. 4300-3800 BCE) are reported from Baluchistan, Kandahar and Northwest Frontier Pakistan. Quetta Miri is the largest site of this phase. Agriculture and herding were well established during this Period. There was craft specialization in metallurgy, bead manufacture and potting. Wheel technology became increasingly common in the Togau Phase. The ceramics of Togau are fine, wheelmade and slipped in red and painted with black. The rim portions of the vessels are also definable. Bowls are the dominant shapes. The identity of these Wares rests on its surface designs, which are primarily naturalistic and stylized figures of ungulates. In South Asian designs these are perhaps the earliest examples of stylization and its evolution. This phase also witnessed significant craft activities. Mehrgarh was the hub of commerce. This phase also revealed evidences for melting, refining and possibly smelting of copper in a domestic type building with 3 three walls. Other finds include grinding stones, pestles, flint tools, drill bits, beads of steatite paste and shell bangles. Compartmented buildings were also constructed in this period. 3.3 Kechi Beg Phase In this Phase (c. 3800-3200 BCE), there was a significant growth in the number of settlements. 153 sites of this Phase are reported from Baluchistan, Kandahar and Northwest Frontier Pakistan. Dabar Kot is the largest site. Major sites of this period are Kechi Beg, Anjira and Sheri Khan Tarakai. A large number of terracotta figurines of both humans and cattle were found from this phase. Other finds include terracotta cones, spindle whorls, terracotta boats, bangles, beads, bone tools, ground stone tools and chipped stone tools. The faunal remains from Sheri Khan Tarakai include zebu (Bos indicus), sheep (Ovis aries), goat (Capra hircus) and water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). The Kechi Beg Phase is the most poorly known period at Mehrgarh, where Periods IV, V and VI have traces of this assemblage. It is clear that there was continuity in metallurgy and some interesting changes in the subsistence regime. At Mehrgarh, grape pips occur in this phase and persist through all subsequent periods until the abandonment of the site. The ascendancy of barley over wheat also seems to take place during this period. Its pottery include Zari Ware, Basket marked Ware of Togau, Anjira Ware and Nal ceramics. The Kechi Beg ceramic forms include open bowls and small mouthed bowls and globular jars. A variety of clay pastes seem to have used for its production. Similarly its surfaces were slipped with different colours; dominantly red and buff. Vessels with polychrome
Recommended publications
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
    [Show full text]
  • Bharati Volume 4
    SARASVATI Bharati Volume 4 Gold bead; Early Dynastic necklace from the Royal Cemetery; now in the Leeds collection y #/me raed?sI %/-e A/hm! #N/m! Atu?vm! , iv/Èaim?Sy r]it/ e/dm! -ar?t jn?m! . (Vis'va_mitra Ga_thina) RV 3.053.12 I have made Indra glorified by these two, heaven and earth, and this prayer of Vis'va_mitra protects the race of Bharata. [Made Indra glorified: indram atus.t.avam-- the verb is the third preterite of the casual, I have caused to be praised; it may mean: I praise Indra, abiding between heaven and earth, i.e. in va_kdevi Sarasvati the firmament]. Dr. S. Kalyanaraman Babasaheb (Umakanta Keshav) Apte Smarak Samiti Bangalore 2003 PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com SARASVATI: Bharati by S. Kalyanaraman Copyright Dr. S. Kalyanaraman Publisher: Baba Saheb (Umakanta Keshav) Apte Smarak Samiti, Bangalore Price: (India) Rs. 500 ; (Other countries) US $50 . Copies can be obtained from: S. Kalyanaraman, 3 Temple Avenue, Srinagar Colony, Chennai, Tamilnadu 600015, India email: [email protected] Tel. + 91 44 22350557; Fax 24996380 Baba Saheb (Umakanta Keshav) Apte Smarak Samiti, Yadava Smriti, 55 First Main Road, Seshadripuram, Bangalore 560020, India Tel. + 91 80 6655238 Bharatiya Itihasa Sankalana Samiti, Annapurna, 528 C Saniwar Peth, Pune 411030 Tel. +91 020 4490939 Library of Congress cataloguing in publication data Kalyanaraman, Srinivasan. Sarasvati/ S. Kalyanaraman Includes bibliographical references and index 1.River Sarasvati. 2. Indian Civilization. 3. R.gveda Printed in India at K. Joshi and Co., 1745/2 Sadashivpeth, Near Bikardas Maruti Temple, Pune 411030, Bharat ISBN 81-901126-4-0 FIRST PUBLISHED: 2003 2 PDF Created with deskPDF PDF Writer - Trial :: http://www.docudesk.com About the Author Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • VLE List Hisar District
    VLE List Hisar District Block CSC LOCATION VLE_NAME Status Adampur Kishangarh Anil Kumar Working Adampur Khairampur Bajrang Bali Working Adampur Mandi Adampur Devender Duddi not working Adampur Chaudhariwali Vishnu Kumar Working Adampur Bagla Parhlad Singh Working Adampur Chuli Bagrian Durgesh Working Adampur Adampur Gaon Manmohan Singh Working Adampur Sadalpur Mahender Singh Working Adampur Khara Barwala Vinod Kumar Working Adampur Moda Khera Jitender Working Adampur Kabrel Suresh Rao Working Adampur Chuli Kallan Pushpa Rani Working Adampur Ladvi Anil Kumar Working Adampur Chuli Khurd Mahesh Kumar Working Adampur Daroli Bharat Singh Working Adampur Chabarwal Sandeep Kumar Working Adampur Dhani Siswal Sunil Kumar Working Adampur Jawahar Nagar Rachna not working Adampur Asrawan Ramesh Kumar Working Adampur Mahlsara Parmod Kumar Working Adampur Dhani Mohbatpur Sandeep Kumar Working ADAMPUR Mohbatpur Parmod Working ADAMPUR Kajla Ravinder Singh not working Adampur Mothsara Pawan Kumar Working Adampur Siswal Sunil Kumar Working Adampur Gurshal Surender Singh not working Adampur Kohli Indra Devi Working Adampur Telanwali Nawal Kishore Working Agroha Fransi Bhupender Singh Working Agroha Kuleri Hanuman Working Agroha Agroha Suresh Kumar not working Agroha Nangthala Mohit Kathuria Working Agroha Kanoh Govind Singh Working Agroha Kirori Vinod Kumar Working Agroha Shamsukh Pawan Kumar Working Agroha Chikanwas Kuldeep Kumar Working Agroha Siwani Bolan Sanjay Kumar Working Agroha Mirpur Sandeep Kumar Working Agroha Sabarwas Sunil kumar Working Agroha
    [Show full text]
  • Bannu Basin, N.W.F.P., Pakistan: a Review C.A
    Ancient Pakistan, Vol. XIX - 2008 PREHISTORIC AND HISTORIC CERAMIC PRODUCTION IN THE BANNU BASIN, N.W.F.P., PAKISTAN: A REVIEW C.A. Petrie, F. Khan, J.R. Knox, P. Magee, J.C. Morris and K.D. Thomas Introduction Since 1985, members of the Bannu Archaeological Project have been engaged in a long term research programme investigating the Prehistoric and Historic period archaeology of the Bannu Basin, which lies in the North West Frontier Province (N.W.F.P.), Pakistan. The survey and excavation of numerous Late Prehistoric archaeological sites, including Sheri Khan Tarakai, Girdai, Ter Kala Dheri, Lak Largai, Lewan, Islam Chowki and Tarakai Qila, and excavation of Historic period occupation at Ter Kala Dheri and the great mound site of Akra have shown that there is a clearly defined and often highly distinctive cultural sequence for the Bannu region that spans the period between c.4000 BC and c.AD 1200 (see Figure 1). Over the last 40 years, excavations have also been carried out at a number of sites on the Gomal Plain, which is a geographically distinct part of the N.W.F.P. that lies to the south of the Bannu Basin. The excavations at sites such as Gumla, Jhandi Babar A, Rehman Dheri and Ghandi Umar Khan (see Figure 1), have shown that in certain Late Prehistoric periods, there is a very close relationship between the cultural sequences of the Bannu and that Gomal regions, while in others, the cultural sequences of the two regions appear to take divergent trajectories. This is particularly significant for our understanding of patterns of social and economic development, and of interaction both within the N.W.F.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Abrcs (Aug-2021)
    List of Vacancies Offered in Re-Counselling of ABRCs (Aug-2021) SN District BlockName Cluster Name 1 Ambala AMBALA-I (CITY) GSSS MAJRI 2 Ambala AMBALA-I (CITY) GSSS MOHRI BHANOKHERI 3 Ambala AMBALA-I (CITY) GSSS CHHAPRA 4 Ambala AMBALA-I (CITY) GSSS JANSUI 5 Ambala AMBALA-I (CITY) GSSS ISMAILPUR 6 Ambala AMBALA-I (CITY) GSSS NAGGAL 7 Ambala AMBALA-I (CITY) GSSS NANYOLA 8 Ambala AMBALA-I (CITY) GSSS BAKNOUR 9 Ambala AMBALA-I (CITY) GSSS DURANA 10 Ambala AMBALA-I (CITY) GSSS SHAHPUR 11 Ambala AMBALA-II (CANTT.) GSSS GHEL 12 Ambala AMBALA-II (CANTT.) GSSS RAMBAGH ROAD,A/CANTT 13 Ambala AMBALA-II (CANTT.) GSSS BOH 14 Ambala AMBALA-II (CANTT.) GSSS GARNALA 15 Ambala AMBALA-II (CANTT.) GSSS RAMPUR SARSHERI 16 Ambala AMBALA-II (CANTT.) GSSS SULTANPUR 17 Ambala AMBALA-II (CANTT.) GSSS PANJOKHRA 18 Ambala BARARA GSSS DHANAURA 19 Ambala BARARA GSSS DHEEN 20 Ambala BARARA GSSS TANDWAL 21 Ambala BARARA GSSS UGALA 22 Ambala BARARA GSSS MULLANA 23 Ambala BARARA GSSS THAMBER 24 Ambala BARARA GSSS HOLI 25 Ambala BARARA GSSS ZAFFARPUR 26 Ambala BARARA GSSS RAJOKHERI 27 Ambala BARARA GSSS MANKA-MANKI 28 Ambala NARAINGARH GSSS NAGLA RAJPUTANA 29 Ambala NARAINGARH GSSS KATHEMAJRA 30 Ambala NARAINGARH GSSS DERA 31 Ambala NARAINGARH GSSS BHUREWALA 32 Ambala NARAINGARH GSSS JEOLI 33 Ambala NARAINGARH GSSS LAHA 34 Ambala NARAINGARH GSSS BHARERI KALAN 35 Ambala NARAINGARH GSSS SHAHPUR NURHAD 36 Ambala NARAINGARH GSSS KANJALA 37 Ambala NARAINGARH GSSS GADHAULI 38 Ambala SAHA GSSS KESRI 39 Ambala SAHA GSSS SAMLEHRI 40 Ambala SAHA GSSS NAHONI List of Vacancies Offered
    [Show full text]
  • Haryana Chapter Kurukshetra
    Panchkula Yamunanagar INTACH Ambala Haryana Chapter Kurukshetra Kaithal Karnal Sirsa Fatehabad Jind Panipat Hisar Sonipat Rohtak Bhiwani Jhajjar Gurgaon Mahendragarh Rewari Palwal Mewat Faridabad 4 Message from Chairman, INTACH 08 Ambala Maj. Gen. L.K. Gupta AVSM (Retd.) 10 Faridabad-Palwal 5 Message from Chairperson, INTACH Haryana Chapter 11 Gurgaon Mrs. Komal Anand 13 Kurukshetra 7 Message from State Convener, INTACH Haryana Chapter 15 Mahendragarh Dr. Shikha Jain 17 Rohtak 18 Rewari 19 Sonipat 21 Yamunanagar 22 Military Heritage of Haryana by Dr. Jagdish Parshad and Col. Atul Dev SPECIAL SECTION ON ARCHAEOLOGY AND RAKHIGARHI 26 Urban Harappans in Haryana: With special reference to Bhiwani, Hisar, Jhajjar, Jind, Karnal and Sirsa by Apurva Sinha 28 Rakhigarhi: Architectural Memory by Tapasya Samal and Piyush Das 33 Call for an International Museum & Research Center for Harrapan Civilization, at Rakhigarhi by Surbhi Gupta Tanga (Director, RASIKA: Art & Design) MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRMAN INTACH Over 31 years from its inception, INTACH has been dedicated towards conservation of heritage, which has reflected in its various works in the field of documentation of tangible and intangible assets. It has also played a crucial role in generating awareness about the cultural heritage of the country, along with heritage awareness programmes for children, professionals and INTACH members. The success of INTACH is dedicated to its volunteers, conveners and members who have provided valuable inputs and worked in coordination with each other. INTACH has been successful in generating awareness among the local people by working closely with the local authorities, local community and also involving the youth. There has been active participation by people, with addition of new members every year.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Wednesday Afternoon April 22, 2009 Wednesday Evening April
    THURSDAY MORNING: April 23, 2009 23 Program Wednesday Afternoon April 22, 2009 [1A] Workshop NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN THE PRESERVATION OF DIGITAL DATA FOR ARCHAEOLOGY Room: L404 Time: 1:00 AM−4:30 PM Wednesday Evening April 22, 2009 [1] SYMPOSIUM ARCHAEOLOGY BEYOND ARCHAEOLOGY Room: Marquis Ballroom Time: 6:00 PM−9:00 PM Organizers: Michael Smith and Michael Barton Chairs: Michelle Hegmon and Michael Barton Participants: 6:00 Michael Smith—Just How Useful is Archaeology for Scientists and Scholars in Other Disciplines? 6:15 Tim Kohler—Model-Based Archaeology as a Foundation for Interdisciplinary and Comparative Research, and an Antidote to Agency/Practice Perspectives 6:30 Michael Barton—From Narratives to Algorithms: Extending Archaeological Explanation Beyond Archaeology 6:45 Margaret Nelson—Long-term vulnerability and resilience 7:00 Joseph Tainter—Energy Gain and Organization 7:15 Patrick Kirch—Archaeology and Biocomplexity 7:30 Rebecca Storey—Urban Health from Prehistoric times to a Highly Urbanized Contemporary World 7:45 Carla Sinopoli—Historicizing Prehistory: Archaeology and historical interpretation in Late Prehistoric Karnataka, India 8:00 Michelle Hegmon—Crossing Spatial-Temporal Scales, Expanding Social Theory 8:15 Robert Costanza—Sustainability or Collapse: What Can We Learn from Integrating the History of Humans and the Rest of Nature? 8:30 Robert Costanza—Discussant 8:45 James Brooks—Discussant Thursday Morning April 23, 2009 [2] GENERAL SESSION RECENT RESEARCH IN CENTRAL AMERICAN ARCHAEOLOGY Room: International C Time: 8:00
    [Show full text]
  • Annexure-C List of Candidates Whose Applications Received After 05.04
    Annexure-C List of candidates whose applications received after 05.04.2019 at 05:00 PM Sr. No. Name Father’s Name Date of Birth Address 1. Sombir Krishan Singh 15.04.1994 V.P.O Lajwana Kalan,Teh-Julana, Distt-Jind 2. Dharmender Shri Krishan 15.08.1993 V.P.O Tigrana,Distt Bhiwani,127031, Ward No.9 3. Rambir Naseeb 10.03.1994 V.P.O Bhuda Khera, Lather Julana, Jind 4. Rakesh Dilbagh 15.12.1993 V.P.O Chhara, Distt- Jhajjar,Teh - Bahadurgarh 5. Mukesh Ram Chander 20.08.1995 V.P.O Moda Khera, Teh- Mandadampur, Distt- Hisar 125052 6. Priya Ranj Mange Ram 23.09.1996 DC Colony, Near Bighar Road By Pass, Fatehbad 7. Ram Juwari Chander Bhan 28.03.1990 Vill-Kithana, P.o-Kithana, Teh Rajaund,Distt- Kaithal 136044 8. Lovely Rampal 12.11.1999 VPO-Hamirgarh Teh-Narwana Distt- Jind 9. Sohan Kuldeep Singh 11.04.1997 VPO- Singowal,Teh – Narwana,Distt- Jind 126116 10. Deepak Hoshiyar Singh 15.07.1995 VPO – Kapro,Teh – Narnaund,Distt- Hisar 11. Rohatash Jagdish 10.06.1997 Hari Nagar,Gali no 7 b,Ward no 21,Narwana,Jind 126116 12. Deepika Rani Piara Lal 15.03.1990 VPO – Hawara Kalan, Teh – Khamano,Distt Fatehgarh Sahib,Punjab 140102 13. Sumit Kumar Dilbag Singh 11.11.1996 VPO – Danoda Kalan,Near- Dada Khera,Teh – Narwana Distt – Jind 14. Preeti Rani Pawan 24.11.1998 VPO- Pur,Teh – Bawani Khera,Distt- Bhiwani 15. Mukesh Babu Ram 29.08.1988 340, Ward no. 9, Killa Mohalla, Near Balmiki Mandir, Tohana, Distt Fatehbad 125120 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum and Syllabus Outlines
    Four Year Integrated Programme in Teacher Education Leading to the degree of B.A. /B.Sc./B.Com. B.Ed. CURRICULUM AND SYLLABUS OUTLINES Maharshi Dayanand University Rohtak Maharshi Dayanand University Rohtak Syllabus Outlines (Educational Studies and Practicum) st 1 Semester ES 1.1 Human Development during Childhood and Adolescence Time: 3 Hours Maximum marks: 100 (External: 80, Internal: 20) Note for Paper Setters: i) Paper setters will set 9 questions in all, out of which students will be required to attempt 5 questions. ii) Q. No. 1 will be compulsory and carries 16 marks. It will be com- prised of 4 short- answer type notes of 4 marks each to be selected from the entire syllabus. iii) Two long-answer type questions will be set from each of the four units, out of which the students will be required to attempt one ques- tion from each unit. Long-answer type questions will carry 16 marks each. iv) All questions will carry equal marks. Objectives of the Course This Course aims at developing an understanding of the constructs of childhood and adolescence from a socio-cultural perspective. Several issues pertaining to development are raised and addressed, so as to encourage students to look at and appreciate pluralistic per- spectives. The student-teacher is also to be equipped with a clear un- derstanding of special needs and issues of inclusion. Social, econom- ic and cultural differences in socialization are looked at critically, so as to enable the students to gain insights into factors influencing children. An attempt has been made to integrate the implications for each aspect of development with the unit itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Walking with the Unicorn Social Organization and Material Culture in Ancient South Asia
    Walking with the Unicorn Social Organization and Material Culture in Ancient South Asia Jonathan Mark KenoyerAccess Felicitation Volume Open Edited by Dennys Frenez, Gregg M. Jamison, Randall W. Law, Massimo Vidale and Richard H. Meadow Archaeopress Archaeopress Archaeology © Archaeopress and the authors, 2018. Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Summertown Pavilion 18-24 Middle Way Summertown Oxford OX2 7LG www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978 1 78491 917 7 ISBN 978 1 78491 918 4 (e-Pdf) © ISMEO - Associazione Internazionale di Studi sul Mediterraneo e l'Oriente, Archaeopress and the authors 2018 Front cover: SEM microphotograph of Indus unicorn seal H95-2491 from Harappa (photograph by J. Mark Kenoyer © Harappa Archaeological Research Project). Access Back cover, background: Pot from the Cemetery H Culture levels of Harappa with a hoard of beads and decorative objects (photograph by Toshihiko Kakima © Prof. Hideo Kondo and NHK promotions). Back cover, box: Jonathan Mark Kenoyer excavating a unicorn seal found at Harappa (© Harappa Archaeological Research Project). Open ISMEO - Associazione Internazionale di Studi sul Mediterraneo e l'Oriente Corso Vittorio Emanuele II, 244 Palazzo Baleani Archaeopress Roma, RM 00186 www.ismeo.eu Serie Orientale Roma, 15 This volume was published with the financial assistance of a grant from the Progetto MIUR 'Studi e ricerche sulle culture dell’Asia e dell’Africa: tradizione e continuità, rivitalizzazione e divulgazione' All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Printed in England by The Holywell Press, Oxford This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com © Archaeopress and the authors, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Kalibangan (Pre – Harappan Settlement)
    Kalibangan (Pre – Harappan Settlement) Dr. Dilip Kumar Assistant Professor (Guest) Dept. of Ancient Indian History & Archaeology, Patna University, Patna Paper – CC-XI, Sem. – III Kalibangan is a town located at 29.47°N 74.13°E on the left or southern banks of the Ghaggar (Ghaggar - Hakra River) in Rajasthan. The Kalibangan pre-historic site was discovered by Luigi Pio Tessitori, an Italian Indologists (1887–1919). He was doing some research in ancient Indian texts and was surprised by the character of ruins in that area. He sought help from Sir John Marshall of the Archaeological Survey of India. At that time the ASI was conducting excavations at Harappa, but they were unaware of the significance of the ruins. In fact, Tessitori was the first person to recognize that the ruins were 'Prehistoric' and pre-Mauryan. Luigi Pio Tessitori also pointed out the nature of the culture, but at that time it was not possible to guess that the ruins of Kalibangan lay within the Indus Valley Civilization. He died five years before the Harappan culture was formally recognized. After India's independence, both the major Harappan cities together with the Indus became a part of Pakistan and Indian archaeologists were compelled to intensify the search for Harappan sites in India. Amlanand Ghosh (Ex. Director General, Archaeological Survey of India, or ASI) was the first person to recognise this site as Harappan and marked it out for excavations. Under the leadership of B. B. Lal (then Director General, ASI), Balkrishna (B.K.) Thapar, M. D. Khare, K. M. Shrivastava and S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Decline of Harappan Civilization K.N.DIKSHIT
    The Decline of Harappan Civilization K.N.DIKSHIT EBSTRACT As pointed out by N. G. Majumdar in 1934, a late phase of lndus civilization is illustrated by pottery discovered at the upper levels of Jhukar and Mohenjo-daro. However, it was the excavation at Rangpur which revealed in stratification a general decline in the prosperity of the Harappan culture. The cultural gamut of the nuclear region of the lndus-Sarasvati divide, when compared internally, revealed regional variations conforming to devolutionary tendencies especially in the peripheral region of north and western lndia. A large number of sites, now loosely termed as 'Late Harappan/Post-urban', have been discovered. These sites, which formed the disrupted terminal phases of the culture, lost their status as Harappan. They no doubt yielded distinctive Harappan pottery, antiquities and remnants of some architectural forms, but neither town planning nor any economic and cultural nucleus. The script also disappeared. ln this paper, an attempt is made with the survey of some of these excavated sites and other exploratory field-data noticed in the lndo-Pak subcontinent, to understand the complex issue.of Harappan decline and its legacy. CONTENTS l.INTRODUCTION 2. FIELD DATA A. Punjab i. Ropar ii. Bara iii. Dher Majra iv. Sanghol v. Katpalon vi. Nagar vii. Dadheri viii. Rohira B. Jammu and Kashmir i. Manda C. Haryana i. Mitathal ii. Daulatpur iii. Bhagwanpura iv. Mirzapur v. Karsola vi. Muhammad Nagar D. Delhi i. Bhorgarh 125 ANCiENT INDlA,NEW SERIES,NO.1 E.Western Uttar Pradesh i.Hulas il.Alamgirpur ili.Bargaon iv.Mandi v Arnbkheri v:.Bahadarabad F.Guiarat i.Rangpur †|.Desalpur ili.Dhola宙 ra iv Kanmer v.」 uni Kuran vi.Ratanpura G.Maharashtra i.Daimabad 3.EV:DENCE OF RICE 4.BURIAL PRACTiCES 5.DiSCUSS10N 6.CLASSiFiCAT10N AND CHRONOLOGY 7.DATA FROM PAKISTAN 8.BACTRIA―MARGIANAARCHAEOLOGICAL COMPLEX AND LATE HARAPPANS 9.THE LEGACY 10.CONCLUS10N ・ I.
    [Show full text]