DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Environmental Impact Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Environmental Impact Report KAISER CENTER OFFICE PROJECT Response to Comments and Final Environmental Impact Report Prepared for April 2011 City of Oakland KAISER CENTER OFFICE PROJECT Response to Comments and Final Environmental Impact Report Prepared for April 2011 City of Oakland 350 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza Suite 300 Oakland, CA 94612 510.839.5066 www.esassoc.com Los Angeles Olympia Petaluma Portland Sacramento San Diego San Francisco Seattle Tampa Woodland Hills 206213.00 OUR COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY | ESA helps a variety of public and private sector clients plan and prepare for climate change and emerging regulations that limit GHG emissions. ESA is a registered assessor with the California Climate Action Registry, a Climate Leader, and founding reporter for the Climate Registry. ESA is also a corporate member of the U.S. Green Building Council and the Business Council on Climate Change (BC3). Internally, ESA has adopted a Sustainability Vision and Policy Statement and a plan to reduce waste and energy within our operations. This document was produced using recycled paper. TABLE OF CONTENTS Kaiser Center Office Development Project Responses to Comments and Final EIR Page I. Introduction I-1 A. CEQA Process I-1 B. Consideration of the Final EIR I-2 C. Organization of this Document I-2 II. Project Overview II-1 A. Project Summary II-1 B. Site Location and Setting II-1 C. Key Components of the Project and Phasing II-2 D. Public Agency Approvals II-2 III. Commenters on the DEIR III-1 A. Agencies, Organizations and Individuals Commenting in Writing III-1 B. Commenters at the Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board Public Hearing III-2 C. Commenters at the Planning Commission Public Hearing III-2 IV. Revisions to the DEIR IV-1 A. Updates to the DEIR Resulting from New and Updated Information Since Publication of the DEIR IV-1 B. Revisions to Draft EIR IV-8 C. Revised Impacts, Standard Conditions, and Mitigation Measures IV-28 V. Responses to Written Comments Received on the Draft EIR V-1 Letter A – Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse V-2 Letter B – California Department of Transportation V-5 Letter C – California Geological Survey V-9 Letter D – Alameda County Transportation Commission V-11 Letter E – Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) V-14 Letter F – AC Transit V-39 Letter G – East Bay Municipal Utility District V-42 Letter H – Oakland Heritage Alliance V-48 Letter I – Walk Oakland Bike Oakland V-53 Letter J – Naomi Schiff V-56 VI. Responses to Comments Received at the City of Oakland VI-1 Landmarks Preservations Advisory Board Public Hearing on the Draft EIR Kaiser Center Office Project i ESA / 206213 Responses to Comments / Final Environmental Impact Report April 2011 Table of Contents Page VII. Responses to Comments Received at the City of Oakland VII-1 Planning Commission Public Hearing on the Draft EIR Appendices A. Kaiser Center Office Project Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan A-1 B. Final Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Plan B-1 C. Preferred Measure DD C-1 C.1 Proposed Measure DD Improvements C.1-1 C.2 Proposed Kaiser Center Project Mitigation Measures Related to the Preferred Measure DD Configuration C.2-1 C.3 Preferred Configuration to Mitigate Impacts of the Kaiser Center Office Project Memorandum C.3-1 Tables IV.B-11 Baseline Operational GHG Emissions Inventory from the Proposed Project IV-4 IV.B-4 Average Daily Construction-Related Pollutant Emissions IV-10 II-1 Revised Summary of Impacts, Standard Conditions of Approval, Mitigation Measures, and Residual Impacts IV-29 V-1 BART Weekday Average Exits V-24 V-2 BART Train Capacity Utilization (Existing plus Project Conditions) V-26 V-3 BART Peak Hour Passenger Volume (Existing plus Project Conditions) V-27 V-4 BART Train Capacity Utilization (Existing plus Project – TDM Scenario 1) V-29 V-5 BART Peak Hour Passenger Volume (Existing plus Project Conditions – TDM Scenario 1) V-30 V-6 BART Train Capacity Utilization (Existing plus Project Conditions – TDM Scenario 2) V-30 V-7 BART Peak Hour Passenger Volume (Existing plus Project Conditions – TDM Scenario 2) V-32 Figure V-1 Potential Pedestrian, Bicycle and Public Amenity Improvements (Conceptual) 20th Street from Broadway to Franklin Street V-34 Kaiser Center Office Project ii ESA / 206213 Responses to Comments / Final Environmental Impact Report April 2011 CHAPTER I Introduction A. CEQA Process An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is an informational document prepared by a Lead Agency (in this case, the City of Oakland) that contains environmental analysis for public review and for agency decision-makers to use in their consideration of development proposals. On August 23, 2010, the City of Oakland (Lead Agency) released for public review a Draft EIR (or DEIR) for the Kaiser Center Office Development Project (ER08-003). The 45-day public review and comment period on the DEIR began on Monday, August 23, 2010. The Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board held a public hearing on the DEIR on October 4, 2010, and the City of Oakland Planning Commission held a public hearing on the DEIR October 6, 2010. The public review and comment period ended at 4:00 p.m. Thursday, October 7, 2010. This Responses to Comments document, together with the DEIR and the DEIR Appendices, constitute the Final EIR (or FEIR) for the Project. Due to its length, the text of the DEIR is not included with this Response to Comments document; however, it is included by reference as part of the Final EIR. The City of Oakland will consider the Final EIR before approving or denying the proposed Project. Before the Lead Agency may approve the project, it must certify that the Final EIR adequately discloses the environmental effects of the proposed Project, that the Final EIR has been completed in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and that the decision-making body of the Lead Agency independently reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final EIR. Certification of the Final EIR would indicate the City’s determination that the Final EIR adequately evaluates the environmental impacts that could be associated with the proposed project. The City of Oakland has prepared this document pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15132 which specifies the following (and which also applies to Draft and Final EIRs): “The Final EIR shall consist of: (a) The DEIR or a revision of that draft. (b) Comments and recommendations received on the DEIR either verbatim or in a summary. (c) A list of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the DEIR. Kaiser Center Office Project I-1 ESA / 206213 Responses to Comments / Final Environmental Impact Report April 2011 I. Introduction (d) The response of the Lead Agency to significant environmental points raised in review and consultation process. (e) Any other information added by the Lead Agency.” This Final EIR incorporates comments from public agencies and the general public and contains the Lead Agency’s responses to those comments. B. Consideration of the Final EIR If significant new information is added to an EIR after notice of public review has been given, but before final certification of the EIR, the lead agency must issue a new notice and re-circulate the EIR for further comments and consultation. (Laurel Heights Improvement Association v. Regents of the University of California, 6 Cal 4th 112 (1993)) The City has determined that none of the corrections or clarifications to the DEIR identified in this document constitutes significant new information pursuant to Section 15088.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. As a result, a Recirculation of the DEIR is not required. Specifically, the new information, corrections or clarifications presented in this document do not disclose that: • A new significant environmental impact would result from the project or from a new mitigation measure (or standard condition) proposed to be implemented; • A substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact would result unless mitigation measures (or standard conditions) are adopted that reduce the impact to a level of insignificance; • A feasible project alternative or mitigation measure (or standard condition) considerably different from others previously analyzed would clearly lessen the significant environmental impacts of the project, but the project’s proponents decline to adopt it; or • The DEIR was so fundamentally and basically inadequate and conclusory in nature that meaningful public review and comment were precluded. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5) Information presented in the DEIR and this document support the City’s determination that Recirculation of the DEIR is not required. C. Organization of this Document This Final EIR contains information about the proposed Project, supplemental environmental information, and responses to comments raised during the public review and comment period on the DEIR. Following this introductory chapter, the document is organized as described below. • Chapter 2, Project Summary, summarizes the proposed Project as presented in the DEIR as the Project Applicant has not made any changes to the project since publication of the DEIR. Kaiser Center Office Project I-2 ESA / 206213 Responses to Comments / Final Environmental Impact Report April 2011 I. Introduction • Chapter 3, Commenters on the DEIR, lists all agencies, organizations and individuals that submitted written comments on the DEIR during the public review and comment period, and/or that commented at the Planning Commission Public Hearing and/or the Landmarks Preservation Advisory Board Public Hearing on the DEIR. • Chapter 4, Revisions to the DEIR, contains text changes and corrections to the DEIR initiated by the Lead Agency or resulting from comments received on the DEIR. Chapter 4 also presents clarified, refined and updated information to the DEIR. • Chapter 5, Responses to Written Comments Received on the DEIR, contains each of the comment letters received on the DEIR and presents individual responses to the specific comments raised in each letter.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • KASRA Retiree News
    Kaiser Aluminum Salaried Retirees Association - P.O. Box 1171, Lafayette, CA 94549 (925) 284-7009 KASRA Nov. 2003 Email: [email protected] RetireeRetiree NewNewss Dear Fellow Retiree: Because no changes have yet been negotiated or agreed to or approved by the Bankruptcy Court, we caution As you know from my October 3 cover note and the against taking any action to replace current coverage. Joint Statement issued by Kaiser Aluminum and the However, as I said to the retiree groups, it is wise to Official Committee of Salaried Retirees (the “1114 be prepared so that you will be in a position to act Committee”) appointed by the Bankruptcy Court, ne- quickly should the need arise. gotiations have begun between the company and the 1114 Committee. I also told the attendees at these meetings that the 1114 Committee will be sending each retiree and sur- The company has indicated in its public filings that viving spouse a second publication, “Shopper’s Guide substantial modification or termination of certain re- to Medicare Supplement Insurance,” prepared by tiree benefits, such as medical and life insurance, will Weiss Ratings Inc. (Weiss evaluates the financial be required. Because substantial modification or ter- strength of more than 15,000 institutions, including life mination of the salaried retiree benefits at some time in and health insurers, banks, savings and loans, and bro- the future is a likely result of the company’s Chapter kerage firms.) Its Shopper’s Guide to Medicare Sup- 11 reorganization process, the company and the 1114 plement Insurance covers providers of so-called Medi- Committee are exploring alternative providers of medi- gap insurance.
    [Show full text]
  • Request for Proposals: Rehabilitation & Operation of the Henry J. Kaiser
    REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (Notice of Development Opportunity) For the Rehabilitation and Adaptive Reuse of The HENRY J. KAISER CONVENTION CENTER also known as the Oakland Municipal Auditorium Release Date: September 22, 2014 Deadline for Submissions: November 12, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUMMARY OF OFFERING .................................................................................... 1 II. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 3 III. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ................................................................................. 4 IV. PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND DESIRED LAND USES ..........................................13 V. KEY TERMS ......................................................................................................15 VI. REGULATORY SETTING ...................................................................................17 VII. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS & EVALUATION CRITERIA ......................................19 VIII. SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS .........................................22 IX. SELECTION PROCESS, AWARD AND NEXT STEPS .......................................... 30 X. CITY OF OAKLAND REQUIREMENTS AND PROGRAMS .................................... 34 XI. ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS .......................................................... 43 XII. ATTACHMENTS AND ELECTRONIC LINKS ��������������������������������������������������������46 RFP: HENRY J. KAISER CONVENTION CENTER I. SUMMARY OF OFFERING OPPORTUNITY
    [Show full text]
  • Convention Center
    PROPOSAL FOR THE REHABILITATION and ADAPTIVE REUSE OF THE HENRY J. KAISER CONVENTION CENTER One Lake Merritt Submitted to the City of Oakland CREA TIVE November 12, 2014 DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS Text Here PROPOSAL FOR THE REHABILITATION and ADAPTIVE REUSE OF THE HENRY J. KAISER CONVENTION CENTER Submitted to the City of Oakland November 12, 2014 CREA TIVE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS November 12, 2014 Dear Oakland, We love you. There, we said it. Feels much better to just come right out with it before we say anything else. We love you for so many reasons - you’re diverse, passionate and creative - you make us feel special. You make the Bay Area feel special. You stand for equality and opportunity while the world around us seems to simply stand by as equality and opportunity pass by. We’d do anything to be with you. So we’re giving you our heart, our imagination, and our soul. Please meet One Lake Merritt. Over the last two years, Creative Development Partners has fallen even more deeply in love with Oakland in assembling One Lake Merritt. We have learned a great deal, through the engagement of so many segments of the community, how we can build what Oakland needs, wants and deserves. But ultimately, we are proposing One Lake Merritt because we are an Oakland team. We are the team, the investors, and the deep relationships with the community, institutions and organizations, to work with the City to transform the Henry J. Kaiser Convention Center into a project that creates opportunities for all, propels the economy, and lifts up our identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry J. Kaiser, Jr. Papers, 1937-1961
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf3x0nb00m No online items Guide to the Henry J. Kaiser, Jr. Papers, 1937-1961 Processed by Rosemary Evetts The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu © 1996 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Note Social Sciences --Business and EconomicsHistory --History, United States (excluding California) Guide to the Henry J. Kaiser, Jr. BANC MSS 88/205 c 1 Papers, 1937-1961 Guide to the Henry J. Kaiser, Jr. Papers, 1937-1961 Collection number: BANC MSS 88/205 c The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Contact Information: The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu Processed by: Rosemary Evetts Date Completed: 1989 Encoded by: Alvin D. Pollock © 1996 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Henry J. Kaiser, Jr. Papers, Date (inclusive): 1937-1961 Collection Number: BANC MSS 88/205 c Collector: Kaiser, Henry J., 1917-1961 Extent: Number of containers: 8 cartons, 1 portfolioLinear feet: 10 Repository: The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California 94720-6000 Physical Location: For current information on the location of these materials, please consult the Library's online catalog. Abstract: Collection contains business and personal correspondence, speeches, subject files. Languages Represented: English Access The collection is open for use. Publication Rights Copyright has been assigned to The Bancroft Library.
    [Show full text]
  • A Downtown for Everyone Robert A
    REPORT SEPTEMBER 2015 A DOWNTOWN Shaping the future of FOR downtown Oakland EVERYONE Contents Acknowledgements 4 Executive Summary SPUR staff Egon Terplan, Project lead 6 Introduction Mohit Shewaramani, Oakland Fellow 9 How We Got Here Sarah Jo Szambelan, Research Manager Robert Ogilvie, Oakland Director 12 Today’s Opportunities and Challenges SPUR Oakland City Board 20 Our Vision: A Downtown for Everyone Robert A. Wilkins (project co-chair) Bill Stotler (project co-chair) 24 BIG IDEA 1 Tomiquia Moss (board chair) Grow 50,000 more jobs in downtown and create pathways to get Fred Blackwell people into them. Deborah Boyer 33 BIG IDEA 2 Anagha Dandekar Clifford Jose Corona Bring 25,000 more residents to downtown at a range of incomes, and Charmaine Curtis enable existing residents to remain. Paul Figueroa 37 BIG IDEA 3 Mike Ghielmetti Set clear and consistent rules for growth to make downtown a better Spencer Gillette place for everyone. Chris Iglesias Robert Joseph 44 BIG IDEA 4 Ken Lowney Create inviting public spaces and streets as part of an active public Christopher Lytle realm. Olis Simmons Joshua Simon 54 BIG IDEA 5 Resources and reviewers Make it easy to get to and around downtown through an expanded Anyka Barber, Alex Boyd, Anthony Bruzzone, Clarissa transportation network. Cabansagan, Dave Campbell, Jim Cunradi, John Dolby, 63 Big Ideas for the Future Margo Dunlap, Karen Engel, Sarah Filley, Rachel Flynn, Erin Ferguson, Sarah Fine, Aliza Gallo, Jennie Gerard, June 66 Plan of Action Grant, Savlan Hauser, Linda Hausrath, Zakiya Harris,
    [Show full text]
  • The Kaiser Plan
    Health Policy Advisory HEALTH PAC Center No. 55 November 1973 taiLta. mi THE KAISER PLAN on a variety of government policies, en­ ial: HMO's dorses HMO's in its April, 1973 report. When Forbes and Fortune magazines run Westinghouse is studying the possibility successive articles contending that health of starting one in Florida. Texas Instru­ maintenance organizations (HMO's) are ments is already involved in setting up "sensible surgery for swelling medical one, and Litton Industries wants to give costs," we know that big business is in­ "seed money" for a number of HMO's. terested. When the supermarket magazine Connecticut General Life Insurance Com­ Family Circle publishes a story entitled pany and the Equitable Life Assurance "Is There An HMO In Your Future?" we Society have made significant commit­ realize that the official word is spreading ments to HMO's. Connecticut General's to the American people. new subsidiary operates them in New Yet most Americans don't understand York, Arizona and Maryland and Equit­ the HMO concept. An HMO is a health able organized and recruited subscribers care organization which is intended to for the Lovelace-Bataan HMO in Albu­ provide comprehensive services to a vol­ querque. untarily enrolled membership at a pre­ One of the most successful HMO's is paid fixed fee. Usually an HMO is affili­ the Kaiser-Permanente medical care pro­ ated with one or several hospitals. It may gram, a prepaid group practice which has be funded privately, publicly or by a been operating in California for over 30 combination of both; it may be for-profit years.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Board
    CAPITOL CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY MEETING OF THE CAPITOL CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD Wednesday September 21, 2005 10:00 a.m. BART Boardroom, 344 20th Street, Kaiser Center Mall, 3rd Floor Oakland, CA, 94612 (see attached map) AGENDA I. Call to Order II. Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance III. Report of the Chair IV. Minutes of June 15, 2005 Meeting Action V. Consent Calendar [no items] VI. Action and Discussion Items (Executive Director) 1. CCJPA FY 06 Budget Action 2. CCJPA/Amtrak FY 06 Fixed Price Operating Agreement Action 3. CCJPA FY 06 Marketing Plan Action 4. FY 2005-06 Budget/Legislative Matters Action 5. Capitol Corridor Automated Ticket Validation Pilot Program Action 6. 2006 STIP Capitol Corridor Intercity Rail Project List Action 7. Results of June 2005 On-Board Surveys Discussion 8. Managing Director’s Report (Status of Service Performance) Info 9. Work Completed a. Vision Plan Update Info b. City of Berkeley Train Station Project Info c. Marketing Activities (June – August 2005) Info 10. Work in Progress a. Oakland-San Jose Track Improvements Info b. Status of UP Design/Engineering and Capacity Analyses Info c. Revisions to CCJPA Station Policy and Service Policy Info d. Regional Measure 2 Projects: Bahia-Benicia Siding, Fairfield/Vacaville Station Info e. Upcoming Marketing Activities Info VII. Board Member Reports VIII. Public Comment IX. Adjournment. Next Meeting Date: 10:00 a.m., November 16, 2005 at City Council Chambers, Suisun City Hall, 701 Civic Center Blvd., City of Suisun City Notes: Members of the public may address the Board regarding any item on this agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Oakland: Dark Star in an Expanding Universe
    Oakland: Dark Star in an Expanding Universe Richard A. Walker Department of Geography University of California Berkeley CA 94720 [email protected] Unpublished paper Draft of Nov. 21, 1997 ANYONE MAY DOWNLOAD AND USE THIS PAPER WITH THE USUAL COURTESY OF CITATION. COPYRIGHT 2004. “Somebody, please, give me a reason to stop saying what I am saying.” --Oakland rapper, Paris1 Oakland is a great American city. But like so many ordinary, workaday places across the country it is disdained and dismissed. Oakland has always played Other to San Francisco, ugly duckling in a bay of swans, sow among pearls, a humdrum and workaday city squatting enviously across from the Golden Gate. In the kind of boastful projection of east coast urbanity typical of the 19th century, the undistinguished settlements across San Antonio slough from little Oakland came to be known as Brooklyn. The appellation might better have been given to Oakland itself, forever just out of reach of the Pacific Coast Manhattan, and following a similar trajectory from ferryboat suburb to brawling industrial giant to present-day catchment for the world’s migrants. Oakland is everything San Francisco is not: never glorious, never glorified, never gloating. Yet Oakland has a story, too, and one that has as many lessons as its cousin across the bay and a geographic landscape replete with both stunning success and sordid failure. Oakland's subordinance has not been as complete as San Franciscans might have hoped, however. After the turn of the century Oakland and the East Bay became the principal arena of growth and the industrial dynamo of the region, a second orb of the metropolis challenging the primacy of the old core.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco, Ca
    CALIFORNIA LAND SITE LIST JOBSITE START END DATE EXPOSURE MODIFICATION DATE DATE LEVEL 100 MCALLISTER STREET--SAN FRANCISCO, CA 01-Jan-51 31-Jan-51 L 110 SIXTH AVE--SAN FRANCISCO, CA 30-Jan-68 - - VL 1200 CALIFORNIA ST--SAN FRANCISCO, CA 01-Jan-64 31-Dec-66 L 12TH COAST GUARD DISTRICT--SAN FRANCISCO, CA 17-Nov-67 - - L 14TH STREET PIER, OUTER HARBOR--OAKLAND, CA 01-Jan-74 31-Jan-74 S 1500 PAGE MILL ROAD--PALO ALTO, CA 02-Dec-71 07-Dec-71 L 22 BATTERY STREET--SAN FRANCISCO, CA 01-Mar-51 31-Mar-51 L 2636 ADELINE STREET--OAKLAND, CA (RES) 01-Jan-52 31-Dec-54 VL 3140 ALFRED ST--SANTA CLARA, CA 16-May-72 16-May-72 VL 31ST AVENUE & GEARY (RES)--SAN FRANCISCO, CA (SENIOR CITIZEN'S HOME) 01-Sep-73 30-Sep-73 VL 329 BRANNAN STREET BUILDING--SAN FRANCISCO, CA 20-Dec-68 - - L 3436 PIERCE ST--SAN FRANCISCO, CA 30-Jan-68 - - VL 433 CALIFORNIA STREET--SAN FRANCISCO, CA 14-Aug-69 21-Aug-69 L 4TH AVENUE APARTMENTS--PALO ALTO, CA 01-Jan-64 31-Dec-72 VL 525 UNIVERSITY AVENUE--PALO ALTO, CA 01-Jan-62 31-Dec-72 VL 5558 CHRISTIE ST--EMERYVILLE, CA 23-Jun-70 23-Jun-70 VL 580 MONTGOMERY ST--SAN FRANCISCO, CA 31-Jul-69 31-Jul-69 L 601 CALIFORNIA STREET--SAN FRANCISCO, CA 01-Jan-53 31-Dec-92 L 635 SACRAMENTO ST--SAN FRANCISCO, CA 06-Dec-65 - - L 7TH & HENSLEY--RICHMOND, CA 01-Jul-72 31-Jul-72 VL 7TH STREET PIER--OAKLAND, CA 01-Oct-70 31-Mar-77 S 807 ACACIA LANE (RES)--SANTA ROSA, CA 01-Jan-49 31-Dec-55 L A.
    [Show full text]
  • APPRAISAL REPORT Henry J. Kaiser Convention Center 10 Tenth Street
    APPRAISAL REPORT Henry J. Kaiser Convention Center 10 Tenth Street Oakland, California March 14, 2019 March 14, 2019 Thang Nguyen Real Estate Agent Real Estate Services City of Oakland 250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 4th Floor Oakland, CA 94612 APPRAISAL REPORT Re: Henry J. Kaiser Convention Center 10 Tenth Street Oakland, California Our Reference No. 190068 Dear Mr. Nguyen: At your request and authorization, we have completed an appraisal of the above-referenced property, which consists of a single parcel of land encompassing a total of 4.79 acres (±208,842 sf). The site is improved with the historic Henry J. Kaiser Convention Center, with a building footprint of 76,900 sf, and a total gross floor area of approximately ±199,700 sf, per City of Oakland Planning Staff. The purpose of the appraisal is to estimate the property's market rental value as of January 25, 2019, under the terms of an assumed long term (99 year) lease. The appraisal analysis will consider the property in its “as is” condition, and its proposed future use as an entertainment venue (theater) and office complex. These conditions will form the basis for the valuation. The intended use of the report is to assist the City of Oakland in negotiation of a proposed disposition of the property by lease (LDDA) to a Orton Development Inc (ODI)). The tenant intends to repair and redevelop the existing building into a mixed-use facility as referred to above. Under this proposed occupancy and use, the gross rentable area of the building (as determined by ODI), totals ±154,963 sf, since certain areas are excluded due to historic preservation criteria or inadequate functionality.
    [Show full text]
  • Insides June
    Summer 1997/Volume 1 No. 1 table of contents Clinical Contributions 9 Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity Associated with Lowering of the Cesarean Delivery Rate. Robert S. McDuffie, Jr, MD, Albert D. Haverkamp, MD, Brenda Beaty, MSPH, Marilyn Leff, MSPH, and Miriam Orleans, PhD, Professor. 14 The Epidemiology of Alcohol and Cardiovascular Diseases. Arthur L. Klatsky, MD. 21 Ethical Principles in Clinical Practice. John Davenport, MD, JD. 25 Beneficial Effect of Mustache Washing on Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Symptoms. Patricia McNally, MD, John Simpson, MD, John Vroom, MD, and Pamela Winder, MS, RN. Clinical Observation; 25 Original Research 26 Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Shoulder Pain With Particular Attention to Diabetic Patients. Jeffrey A. Cohen, MD, David M. Collier, MD, and Karl F. Gross, MD. Health Systems Management 29 Northeast Division Affiliation with Community Health Plan, A Staff Model HMO. Stacy D. Lundin, MD. 32 Computerized Expert Health Assessment with Automated Health Education. David M. Paperny, MD, FAAP. 38 Patient Satisfaction: Comparing Physician Assistants, Nurse Practitioners, and On the Cover/Photograph Physicians. Roderick S. Hooker, PA, Ron Potts, MD, and Wendy Ray. by David Clarke, MD. David is a Gastro- enterologist for Northwest Permanente, PC (NWP). Editors’ Comments Pictured are face and 2 A Voice of Permanente. Tom Janisse, MD, Phillip M. Brenes, MD, Mary Durham, body pigments for sale PhD, Lee Jacobs, MD, Scott Rasgon, MD, and Ek Ursin, MD. outside an ancient Hindu temple on the 5 The Permanente Federation and Partnership: Our Path to a Successful Future. Bagmati River near Oliver Goldsmith, MD. Technology; 32 Kathmandu, Nepal. 6 Lost Signals.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaiserpermanante00cuttrich.Pdf
    University of California Berkeley Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program Oral History Project Cecil C. Cutting, M.D. HISTORY OF THE KAISER PERMANENTE MEDICAL CARE PROGRAM An Interview Conducted by Malca Chall 1985 1986 Copyright (^\ by The Regents of the University of California All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between the University of California and Cecil C. Cutting, M.D., dated July 30, 1985. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California at Berkeley. No part of the manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written permission of the Director of The Bancroft Library of the University of California at Berkeley. Requests for permission to quote for publication should be addressed to the Regional Oral History Office, 486 Library, and should include identification of .the specific passages to be quoted, anticipated use of the passages, and identification of the user. The legal agreement with Cecil C. Cutting, M.D., requires that he be notified of the request and allowed thirty days in which to respond. It is recommended that this oral history be cited as follows: Cecil C. Cutting, M.D., "History of the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program," an oral history conducted in 1985 by Malca Chall, Regional Oral History Office, The Bancroft Library, University of California, Berkeley, 1986. Copy No. CECIL C. CUTTING, M.D. Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program Interviews to be Completed in 1986 Cecil C.
    [Show full text]