DOCSLIB.ORG

Procurement Double Issue Architecture

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Procurement Double Issue Architecture PROCUREMENT DOUBLE ISSUE Election BULLETIN ARCHITECTURE v76 n1 / March 2019 ARCHITECTURE BULLETIN VOL 76 NO 1 MARCH 2019 ELECTION – HOT BUTTON CAMPAIGN ISSUES FOR ARCHITECTURE B Architecture Bulletin Architecture Bulletin Volume 76, Number 1 March 2019 Election Election 3 NSWA grand Election building 2019: or anAustralian expansive Institute public spaceAustralian on the quay Outrage front? revisited 6 24 ofPeter Architects John Cantrill – key issues survey 4 Glenn Harper Kate Concannon Quay Visions revisited 9 A trail of heritage destruction 26 BeyondKen Maher Opal: a plan for improving Noni Boyd building quality 16 GeoffGilding Hanmerthe public realm: Circular Quay and theFrom Sydney strip clubsOpera to House supermarkets: 14 Glenn Harper five years on from Sydney lockouts 28 Restitching the city by rethinking Sarah Lawlor motorwaysSensing materials 17 of our Country 18 BenjaminDanièle Hromek Driver with Siân and Michael HromekCan we unlock the potential of our schools? 29 TheWelcome climate to change the Eora imperative National Parkand 20 Kasia Podrygajlo theJon builtHazelwood environment and Sharon 20 Wright David Haseler Competitions – a perspective 30 Learning from Circular Quay 24 Angelo Candalepas Image: ink drop – stock.adobe.com Image: ink drop AbolishKerwin Datudiscretionary planning 22 Kerwin Datu Quality and the public realm 32 Peter Mould Good amenity is good policy 22 Michael Zanardo Chapter 34 Messages from the NSW Chapter 34 Architecture Bulletin reflections and projections 40 Change of guard in NSW 36 Provoke / Mirror of the profession 45 Patrons’ news 38 Angelo Candalepas Patron’s showcase / Internal design competition drives innovation and creativity at Mirvac Design 39 FRONT COVER artwork by Michael Lewarne – Redshift Architecture & Art v76 n1 / March 2019 1 WRITE TO US Send your feedback or suggestions to [email protected]. We also invite members to contribute articles and reviews to our Chapter section. We reserve the right to edit published responses and contributions. PATRONS Architecture Bulletin thanks the following patrons for their support: Official journal of the NSW Chapter of the Australian Institute of Architects since 1944 MAJOR PATRON Mirvac Design EDITORIAL PUBLISHING SUPPORTING PATRONS EDITOR & DESIGNER Published by the NSW Chapter Allen Jack+Cottier Ricardo Felipe of the Australian Institute of BKA Architects Architects MANAGING EDITOR Conybeare Morrison Kate Concannon Australian Institute of Architects Crone Tusculum, 3 Manning St Francis-Jones Morehen Thorp EDITORIAL CHAIR Potts Point NSW 2011 Kerwin Datu Sydney +61 2 9246 4055 NBRS Architecture EDITORIAL COMMITTEE [email protected] Tanner Kibble Denton Architects Melika Aljukic Ashley Dunn PRINTER Sarah Lawlor Peachy Print ISSN 0729 08714 Published four times a year, Architecture Bulletin is the journal of David Tickle ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTIONS the Australian Institute of Architects, NSW Chapter (ACN 000 023 012). Four issues per year (volume) © Copyright 2019. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without the prior written permission of the publisher, unless for the purpose of Standard $40 / Students $27 research or review. Copyright of the text and images belong to their authors. International $53 [email protected] DISCLAIMER The views and opinions expressed in articles and letters published in Architecture Bulletin are the personal views and opinions of the authors of these writings and do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of the Institute and its officers. Material contained in this publication is general comment and is not intended as advice on any particular matter. No reader should act or fail to act on the basis of any material herein. Readers should consult professional advisers. The Australian BECOME A PATRON ADVERTISE WITH US Institute of Architects NSW Chapter, its officers, editor, editorial committee and [email protected] [email protected] authors expressly disclaim all liability to any persons in respect of acts or omissions 02 9246 4055 02 9246 4055 by any such person in reliance on any of the contents of this publication. 2 Architecture Bulletin Election Both the NSW and Australian parliaments go to elections this autumn. Whether they are likely to be hot button campaign issues or not, there are countless areas where architectural practice is frequently buffeted by shifts in government policy, or where architects have special insights to offer on policy in wider areas. The NSW Chapter has asked the major parties on their views across several of these. Eleven architects also offer their own opinions on topics from design competitions and construction failures to WestConnex and the lockout laws. NSW Election 2019 Australian Institute of Architects – key issues survey Compiled by Kate Concannon The Institute developed its 2019 NSW election platform in consultation with member representatives and key allied professional bodies. This was presented to all major parties for reply. Our stated positions and recommendations are published here along with the responses we received. 4 Architecture Bulletin 1 Ensuring design quality in densification To retain its status as a global city, Sydney – the engine room for Australia’s economy – must compete among the world’s best on measures of liveability, productivity and sustainability. With a growing population, the continued economic and social health of NSW requires intensification – not only expansion through greenfield development. With increasing housing density, the capacity of amenity and design quality is integral to ‘doing density well’. The Institute considers the following are requisite in current conditions to ensure intensification both occurs and occurs successfully: • Establish a talent pool of City Architects at director level made available to all LGAs via GANSW and the Greater Sydney Commission • Support implementation of the requirements set by SEPP 65, the apartment design guidelines and the medium density design guidelines within local government • Mandate design review panels (DRP) in LGAs for projects meeting critical thresholds, with 40% of NSW councils to have an endorsed DRP by March 2020 • Undertake a public education campaign for the medium density housing code and design guide specifically including, more generally, the benefits of density done well. What will your party do to facilitate increasing housing density and see that it is done well – with good infrastructure and services, good design and community buy-in? GREENS LABOR LIBERAL / NATIONALS The Greens will create neighbourhoods A NSW Labor government will introduce The Liberals and Nationals government that meet the needs of local communi- the registration of engineers which will are committed to improving design ties by making ecologically sustainable improve the design and building process quality across the spectrum of different development the primary objective of and weed out incompetent or unquali- types of development. the planning system, with a focus on fied professionals. Further review into SEPP 65 has lifted the quality of meeting the challenges of climate licencing schemes, such as those of apartment design. SEPP 65 is supported change both in what we build and what architects or building designers would by the ADG, a detailed guidance we protect. We will be changing the law be the responsibility of the new building document which provides tools for so that no part of the state can be authority. improving the design of residential apart- targeted for more intense development ment development. until firm and funded commitments are We have also elevated the made for quality public transport, green importance of the office of the Govern- open space, schools, hospitals and ment Architect, and have given the office community facilities. a strategic role across government to provide independent, strategic advice and advocate for better design. This role has been seen through the delivery of Better Placed – an integrated design policy for the built environment in NSW. v76 n1 / March 2019 5 2 Delivering well designed diverse and affordable housing The provision of affordable and diverse housing across all communities in NSW is essential to ensuring citizens’ wellbeing, and the wellbeing of their communities – the manifold economic benefits are amply evidenced. Good design is critical to delivering affordable and diverse housing that improves liveablility, fosters healthier communities, produces broad economic benefits and reduces operational and maintenance costs. Actions that government can take include: incentivising build-to-rent housing and reforming planning and other policies that currently limit diversity (of building types and of financing/ownership models). Without reform people are forced into less than appropriate housing, are subject to housing stress, and cannot properly provide a living environ- ment for their families. To ensure consumers know they are getting what they were promised, the Institute strongly recommends mandating architects ‘close the loop’ on completion of medium density projects, with certification from the original architect being required as part of defect inspections, final certification and release of funds. What initiatives will you take to deliver affordable and diverse housing in established areas that are close to employment and transport etc? How will you ensure good design in this housing? GREENS LABOR LIBERAL / NATIONALS The Greens support urban consolidation A NSW Labor
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CITY of BOROONDARA Review of B-Graded Buildings in Kew, Camberwell and Hawthorn
    CITY OF BOROONDARA Review of B-graded buildings in Kew, Camberwell and Hawthorn Prepared for City of Boroondara January 2007 Revised June 2007 VOLUME 4 BUILDINGS NOT RECOMMENDED FOR THE HERITAGE OVERLAY TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 Main Report VOLUME 2 Individual Building Data Sheets – Kew VOLUME 3 Individual Building Data Sheets – Camberwell and Hawthorn VOLUME 4 Individual Building Data Sheets for buildings not recommended for the Heritage Overlay LOVELL CHEN 1 Introduction to the Data Sheets The following data sheets have been designed to incorporate relevant factual information relating to the history and physical fabric of each place, as well as to give reasons for the recommendation that they not be included in the Schedule to the Heritage Overlay in the Boroondara Planning Scheme. The following table contains explanatory notes on the various sections of the data sheets. Section on data sheet Explanatory Note Name Original and later names have been included where known. In the event no name is known, the word House appears on the data sheet Reference No. For administrative use by Council. Building type Usually Residence, unless otherwise stated. Address Address as advised by Council and checked on site. Survey Date Date when site visited. Noted here if access was requested but not provided. Grading Grading following review (C or Ungraded). In general, a C grading reflects a local level of significance albeit a comparatively low level when compared with other examples. In some cases, such buildings may not have been extensively altered, but have been assessed at a lower level of local significance. In other cases, buildings recommended to be downgraded to C may have undergone alterations or additions since the earlier heritage studies.
    [Show full text]
  • AUSTRALIAN ROMANESQUE a History of Romanesque-Inspired Architecture in Australia by John W. East 2016
    AUSTRALIAN ROMANESQUE A History of Romanesque-Inspired Architecture in Australia by John W. East 2016 CONTENTS 1. Introduction . 1 2. The Romanesque Style . 4 3. Australian Romanesque: An Overview . 25 4. New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory . 52 5. Victoria . 92 6. Queensland . 122 7. Western Australia . 138 8. South Australia . 156 9. Tasmania . 170 Chapter 1: Introduction In Australia there are four Catholic cathedrals designed in the Romanesque style (Canberra, Newcastle, Port Pirie and Geraldton) and one Anglican cathedral (Parramatta). These buildings are significant in their local communities, but the numbers of people who visit them each year are minuscule when compared with the numbers visiting Australia's most famous Romanesque building, the large Sydney retail complex known as the Queen Victoria Building. God and Mammon, and the Romanesque serves them both. Do those who come to pray in the cathedrals, and those who come to shop in the galleries of the QVB, take much notice of the architecture? Probably not, and yet the Romanesque is a style of considerable character, with a history stretching back to Antiquity. It was never extensively used in Australia, but there are nonetheless hundreds of buildings in the Romanesque style still standing in Australia's towns and cities. Perhaps it is time to start looking more closely at these buildings? They will not disappoint. The heyday of the Australian Romanesque occurred in the fifty years between 1890 and 1940, and it was largely a brick-based style. As it happens, those years also marked the zenith of craft brickwork in Australia, because it was only in the late nineteenth century that Australia began to produce high-quality, durable bricks in a wide range of colours.
    [Show full text]
  • Arup: Building the Water Cube
    9-410-054 REV: JUNE 3, 2010 ROBERT G. ECCLES AMY C. EDMONDSON DILYANA KARADZHOVA Arup: Building the Water Cube The Water Cube, as we know it today, is a result of architects and engineers working side by side. Without this collaboration, the Bubble Box would not have been possible. ―Mark Butler, former Associate Director and Senior Design Architect at PTW Architects Landing at Heathrow Airport on June 7, 2009, Arup Principal and Senior Structural Engineer Tristram Carfrae pondered the upcoming dinner for which he had flown over 12,000 miles. Accompanied by four other members of Arup’s Sydney office, Carfrae was in London to attend the Royal Academy of Engineering Awards Dinner where the winner of the 40th annual MacRobert Award was going to be announced. First presented in 1969, the Award was given in recognition of successful development of innovative ideas in engineering and was considered one of the most prestigious awards in the field. The Beijing National Aquatics Center, widely known as the Water Cube, had been one of the four finalists for the award. Engineering firm Arup had designed the Water Cube in partnership with the architecture firm PTW Architects, based in Sydney, and China Construction Design Institute (CCDI). An aquatics center that looked like a box of bubbles, the Water Cube had already won a number of prestigious awards (see Exhibit 1). Its monumental presence in modern Beijing was due to the way in which it reflected Chinese traditions while using natural resources efficiently. Its design goals included environmental, social, and economic sustainability. The structure set new landmarks in the fields of engineering and architecture and challenged conventional thinking that higher quality required larger investments and longer time to design and build.
    [Show full text]
  • Cloud Download
    1 Contents 4 Welcome 6 Jury Members 2017 9 Horbury Hunt Commercial Award 19 Horbury Hunt Residential Award 33 Bruce Mackenzie Landscape Award 43 Kevin Borland Masonry Award 53 Robin Dods Roof Tile Excellence Award 62 Horbury Hunt Commercial Award Entrants Index 62 Horbury Hunt Residential Award Entrants Index 63 Bruce Mackenzie Landscape Award Entrants Index 64 Kevin Borland Masonry Award Entrants Index 64 Robin Dods Roof Tile Excellence Award Entrants Index editor elizabeth mcintyre creative director sally woodward art direction natasha simmons 2 3 Welcome This year marks the eleventh Think Brick Awards – This year’s winners are to be congratulated for their celebrating outstanding architecture and the use imagination, skill and craftsmanship. I hope these of clay brick, concrete masonry and roof tiles in projects ignite your creativity and encourage the contemporary Australian design. Each year, the entries creation of your own designs championing the build on inspiration taken from the previous cohort of use of brick, block, pavers and roof tiles. finalists to present exemplary projects that use these materials in new and exciting ways. The 2017 finalists provide solutions to low-density elizabeth mcintyre housing, a variety of roof systems and landscape group ceo sanctuaries for the home. These innovative projects think brick, cmaa, rtaa show that masonry is being included increasingly in residential and commercial interiors, as well as to create clever connections between indoor and outdoor spaces. Glazed bricks continue to be featured as standout elements in all types of works, particularly in urban design. IS PIERCINGCreativity THE MUNDANE to find the marvelous.- Bill Moyers 5 4 5 cameron bruhn ben green debbie–lyn ryan alexis sanal murat sanal emma williamson elizabeth mcintyre architecture media tzannes mcbride charles ryan sanalarc sanalarc coda think brick Cameron Bruhn is the editorial director at Ben has worked on a large number of significant Debbie Ryan is the founding owner of McBride Alexis Sanal is a co-founder of SANALarc.
    [Show full text]
  • Wahroonga and Waitara Railway Stations
    WAHROONGA AND WAITARA RAILWAY STATIONS Two images by Robert Wilson on 12th August 2017 taken at Wahroonga. The top image shows the Sydney end of the Sydney-bound platform with the 1927 stepway, the 1938 entrance pergola and the trees planted after the removal of three fig trees in 2010. The sites of the gardens on each side of the corridor are shown by the lawn areas. The Coonanbarra Road footbridge is just visible in the distance. In the bottom image, the ‘heritage’ platform seats can be seen towards the Hornsby end of the Hornsby-bound platform with the seat ends embossed with “Wahroonga 1994”. The doors to the public toilets are visible, as is the former location of the garden. 1 CONTENTS THE BIRTH OF THE NORTH SHORE LINE 3 A FUNDING SHORTAGE IMPACTS ON CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS 4 MANIFESTATIONS OF THE IMPACT OF THE CHANGE OF ENGINEERS-IN-CHIEF 5 THE FIRST WAHROONGA STATION BUILDING 1890-1895 7 THE SECOND (PRESENT) WAHROONGA STATION BUILDING 1906 13 THE SECOND STATION MASTER’S RESIDENCE – 1909 18 WAHROONGA STATION GARDEN 21 SHELTER FOR TICKET COLLECTORS WAHROONGA – 1938 22 THE IMPACT OF WORLD WAR TWO ON WAHROONGA 22 WAHROONGA BOOKSTALL – 1957 23 IMPACT OF CITYRAIL AT WAHROONGA – 1993 24 REMOVAL OF PLATFORM VEGETATION WAHROONGA – 2010 28 CONTRIBUTION OF SYDNEY TRAINS 30 A HISTORY OF WAITARA STATION 32 ELEMENTS OF THE WAHROONGA AND WAITARA BUILDINGS THAT REFLECTED THE FEDERATION DESIGN INFLUENCES 35 THE FAMILY OF BUILDINGS TO WHICH THE 1906 WAHROONGA AND 1909 WAITARA STRUCTURES BELONG 35 COMPARISON WITH SIMILAR NORTH SHORE BUILDINGS 43 END REMARKS 46 2 THE BIRTH OF THE NORTH SHORE LINE Premier, George Dibbs, announced in 1883 that the North Shore line was to be built as one of 11 proposed branch lines proposed in that year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Architectural Practice of Gerard Wight and William Lucas from 1885 to 1894
    ABPL90382 Minor Thesis Jennifer Fowler Student ID: 1031421 22 June 2020 Boom Mannerism: The Architectural Practice of Gerard Wight and William Lucas from 1885 to 1894 Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Urban and Cultural Heritage, Melbourne School of Design, University of Melbourne Frontispiece: Herbert Percival Bennett Photograph of Collins Street looking east towards Elizabeth Street, c.1894, glass lantern slide, Gosbel Collection, State Library of Victoria. Salway, Wight and Lucas’ Mercantile Bank of 1888 with dome at centre above tram. URL: http://handle.slv.vic.gov.au/10381/54894. Abstract To date there has been no thorough research into the architectural practice of Wight and Lucas with only a few of their buildings referred to with brevity in histories and articles dealing with late nineteenth-century Melbourne architecture. The Boom era firm of Wight and Lucas from 1885 to 1894 will therefore be investigated in order to expand their catalogue of works based upon primary research and field work. Their designs will be analysed in the context of the historiography of the Boom Style outlined in various secondary sources. The practice designed numerous branches for the Melbourne Savings Bank in the metropolitan area and collaborated with other Melbourne architects when designing a couple of large commercial premises in the City of Melbourne. These Mannerist inspired classical buildings fit the general secondary descriptions of what has been termed the Boom Style of the 1880s and early 1890s. However, Wight and Lucas’ commercial work will be assessed in terms of its style, potential overseas influences and be compared to similar contemporary Melbourne architecture to firstly reveal their design methods and secondly, to attempt to give some clarity to the overall definition of Melbourne’s Boom era architecture and the firm’ place within this period.
    [Show full text]
  • Change. Architecture. Discuss
    Change. Architecture. Discuss. April 2016 A discussion paper on the future direction of architecture and the built environment sector in NSW and beyond Prepared by the NSW Architects Registration The Board wishes to thank those who helped to Board and released in 2016. The NSW Architects provide review and comment in the preparation Registration Board is an independent statutory of this document, especially Professor Roy Green, authority responsible for the administration of the Richard Thorp AM, Peter Salhani, Louise Cox AM, Architects Act 2003. The Board is fully funded by NSW Government Architect Peter Poulet, and Pro- the registration fees from individual architects, and fessor Gerard Reinmuth. We gratefully acknowl- architectural firms or corporations. The Board’s key edge those who contributed images including role is to protect consumers of architectural ser- Hassell, PTW, COX Architecture, Architectus, the vices by promoting a better understanding of ar- University of Sydney, and the University of New chitectural issues in the community; informing the South Wales. public about the qualifications and competence of individuals or organizations holding themselves Board Staff out as architects; accrediting architectural qualifi- Registrar and lead author, Tim Horton cations for the purposes of registration; ensuring Dep Registrar, Examinations, that architects provide services to the public in a Education & Scholarships, Mae Cruz professional and competent manner; and disciplin- Finance and Compliance Lead, Nadine Roberts ing architects who have acted unprofessionally or Projects and Communications Lead, Di Snape incompetently. Finance and Administration, Helen Eichperger Legal and Administration clerk, Gabrielle Shina Cover photo: The Goods Line, Ultimo designed by Aspect Studios with CHROFI Architects for the Level 2, 156 Gloucester St Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • The Architecture Symposium
    Design Speaks The Architecture Symposium Design Speaks. The Architecture Symposium A Forum about Architecture, Design and Urbanism from the Asia Pacific Friday 16 March 2018 PRINCIPAL PARTNER MAJOR PARTNER SUPPORTING PARTNER UNIVERSITY PARTNERS VENUE PARTNER Image not found or type unknownImage not found or typeImage unknown not found or type unknownImage not found or typeImage unknown not found or type unknown Image not found or type unknown ACCOMMODATION PARTNER PART OF Image not found or type unknownImage not found or type unknown 01 Design Speaks The Architecture Symposium Details. Program. When Friday 16 March 2018 8.45am Attendee arrival 9.00 am – 5.00 pm () 9.00am Welcome from Cameron Bruhn, Editorial Director, Architecture Media Where 9.15am MAKI ONISHI AND YUKI HYAKUDA Auditorium 1 and Queensland Terrace, State Library of Queensland Co-directors, Onishimaki + Hyakudayuki Architects Stanley Place (Japan) Brisbane Queensland 10.00am DIANE JONES Executive Director, PTW Architects (Australia) Program Info 10.30am Morning tea Fourteen lauded and experimental practitioners will come together for 11.00am YOUNG JANG AND SOOK HEE CHUN this one-day symposium that Co-directors, Wise Architecture (Korea) explores the innovative thinking and transformative projects that are 11.45am ALEX MOK AND BRIAR HICKLING creating new world cities for the Co-directors, Linehouse Design (China) emerging Asian Century. 12.30pm RICHARD NAISH The speakers reflect the diversity of the countries, cities and people of Founder, RTA Studio (New Zealand) the Asia Pacific and the breadth of 1.00pm Lunch its architecture. They will address the way communities from across 2.00pm CHATPONG CHUENRUDEEMOL the region are responding to the Director, Chat Architects (Thailand) demands of the future and the pivotal role that architecture plays.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdfmachine Trial Version
    BEIJING NATIONAL AQUATICS CENTER The National Aquatics Center, with the Beijing National Stadium in the background Building information Full name : Beijing National Aquatics Center City : Beijing, China Capacity : 17,000 Built : 2004–2007 Opened : 2008 Closed : August 8, 2010, no longer used for competitive swimming Architect(s) : PTW Architects, CSCEC, CCDI, and Arup The Beijing National Aquatics Center, also known as the National Aquatics Center,[1] and nicknamed the Water Cube, (simplified Chinese: 北京国家游泳中心; traditional Chinese: 北京國pdfMachine家游泳中心) is an aquatic s trialcenter th aversiont was built alongside Beijing National Stadium in the Olympic Green for the swimming competitions of the 2008 Summer Olympics. Despite its nickname, the building is not an actual cube, but a cuboid (a rectangular box). Ground was broken on December 24, 2003, and the Center was completed and handed over for use on January 28, 2008.[2] Swimmers at the Water Cube broke 25 world records during the 2008 Olympics.[3] After the Olympics, the building underwent a 200 million Yuan revamp to turn the half of its interior into a water park.[4] The building officially re-opened on August 8, 2010.[5] 8 Architecture The National Aquatics Center at night In July 2003, the Water Cube design was chosen from 10 proposals in an international architectural competition for the aquatic center project.[6] The Water Cube was specially designed and built by a consortium made up of PTW Architects (an Australian architecture firm)[7], Arup international engineering group, CSCEC (China State Construction Engineering Corporation), and CCDI (China Construction Design International) of Shanghai.[8] The Water Cube's design was initiated by a team effort: the Chinese partners felt a square was more symbolic to Chinese culture and its relationship to the Bird's Nest stadium, while the Sydney based partners came up with the idea of covering the 'cube' with bubbles, symbolising water.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Investigation Csr Site, Pyrmont
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION CSR SITE, PYRMONT ( JACKSONS LANDING ) Volume 1: Description, Analysis & Interpretation for Lend Lease Development December 2000 CASEY & LOWE ASSOCIATES Archaeology & Heritage __________________________________________________________ 420 Marrickville Road, Marrickville NSW 2204 • Tel: (02) 9568 5375 Fax: (02) 9572 8409 • Mobile: (0419) 683 152 • E-mail: [email protected] Report Summary REPORT SUMMARY BACKGROUND During October to December 1996 Casey & Lowe Associates undertook the archaeological excavation and testing of areas within the then CSR site (Figs 1.1, 1.2). This site was acquired by Lend Lease to develop into residential accommodation and is now called Jackson’s Landing. The potential archaeological remains of the whole of the CSR site were addressed in an archaeological assessment written by Casey & Lowe Associates in August 1996, ‘Archaeological Assessment CSR Site, Pyrmont’, for Howard Tanner & Associates on behalf of Civil & Civic. This report identified the potential survival of archaeological remains in a number of areas throughout the CSR site. Those sections where the remains were considered to have the greatest potential for survival and were accessible were tested. Three areas were found to have considerable remains and were excavated. Two other areas were found to have limited archaeological remains and were also excavated. Area A contained the remains of four houses, Houses 15 to 21 New Street, Pyrmont (Plans 1, 2, Photo 1). Area B contained the remains of three houses, Houses 67 and 69 Bowman Street and 2 New Street, Pyrmont (Plans 5, 6, Photo 2). Area C contained the remains of four houses, Houses 1 to 7 McCredie Street, a footpath and roadway, Pyrmont (Plans 9-12, Photo 3).
    [Show full text]
  • Asia Architects Website City Country Marina Tabassum Architects Http
    Asia Architects Website City Country Marina Tabassum Architects http://mtarchitekts.com/ Dhaka Bangladesh Christopher Charles Benninger Architects http://www.ccba.in/ Thimphu Bhutan Adrian Smith + Gordon Gill Architecture http://smithgill.com/ Beijing China Aedas http://www.aedas.com/ Beijing China AGC Design LTD http://www.agcdesign.com.hk/ Beijing China Ai Weiwei http://aiweiwei.com/ Beijing China archithinks http://www.archithinks.com/ Beijing China AREP http://www.arep.fr/ Beijing China ARQTEL http://www.arqtel.com/ Beijing China AS.Architecture-Studio http://www.architecture-studio.fr/ Beijing China Atelier 11 http://www.atelier11china.com/ Beijing China Atelier Dreiseitl http://www.dreiseitl.com/ Beijing China Atelier Fronti http://www.fronti.cn/ Beijing China atenastudio http://www.atenastudio.it/ Beijing China B.A.S.E http://www.basebeijing.cn/ Beijing China Ballistic Architecture Machine http://bam-usa.com/ Beijing China BaO http://www.bao-a.com/ Beijing China basic city architecture+urbanism http://www.basiccity.eu/ Beijing China Benoy Limited http://www.benoy.com/ Beijing China BIG http://www.big.dk/ Beijing China www.asiaarchitects.net BuroHappold Engineering http://www.burohappold.com/ Beijing China 1 Asia Architects Website City Country Buro-OS http://www.buro-os.com/ Beijing China Callison http://www.callison.com/ Beijing China Chiasmus Partners http://ar-chiasmus.com/ Beijing China CL3 Architects Limited http://cl3.com/architecture/ Beijing China Corgan http://www.corgan.com/ Beijing China CROSSBOUNDARIES http://www.crossboundaries.net/
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016–2017
    ANNUAL REPORT 2016–2017 Historic Houses Trust of New South Wales ANNUAL REPORT 2016–17 CONTENTS CONTENTS Acknowledgment of Country 2 APPENDICES 110 The Hon Don Harwin MLC From the Chairman 4 Minister for Resources, Minister for Energy and Utilities, From the Executive Director 5 Minister for the Arts, Vice-President of the Executive Council HHT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 133 Level 15, 52 Martin Place Highlights 2016–17 6 SYDNEY NSW 2000 Performance overview 8 Program supporters & partners 198 Our vision, mission, values and approach 10 Admission fees & contacts 200 Index 202 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 12 Corporate partners 204 Dear Minister Our museums 13 Picture credits 205 On behalf of the Board of Trustees and in accordance with the provisions of the Annual Reports (Statutory Bodies) Endangered Houses Fund 21 Act 1984, the Public Finance and Audit Act 1983 and the Public Finance and Audit Regulation 2015, we submit for presentation to Parliament the Annual Report of Sydney Living Museums under the statutory authority of the Historic Board of Trustees 23 Houses Trust of New South Wales for the year ending 30 June 2017. Senior management structure 28 SLM divisions 30 Yours sincerely Organisational chart 31 Volunteers 32 Foundation for the Historic Houses Trust of NSW 32 Strategic Plan development 33 Michael Rose AM Mark Goggin Chairman Executive Director FIVE PILLARS 34 Increasing visitation 34 Deepening engagement 52 Investing in our assets 72 Growing revenue streams 92 The Historic Houses Trust of NSW, SYDNEY LIVING MUSEUMS T 02 8239 2288 Investing in people and culture 100 incorporating Sydney Living Head Office F 02 8239 2299 Museums, cares for significant historic The Mint E [email protected] places, buildings, landscapes and 10 Macquarie Street TTY 02 8239 2377 collections.
    [Show full text]