Freight Train of Change at Statehouse Landmark Education, Abortion Legislation Poised for Daniels’ Signature by BRIAN A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Rare Campaign for Senate Succession Senate President Pro Tem Sen
V23, N25 Tursday, Feb. 15, 2018 A rare campaign for Senate succession Senate President Pro Tem Sen. Ryan Mishler in Kenley’s appropria- Long’s announcement sets up tions chair, and Sen. Travis Holdman in battle last seen in 2006, 1980 Hershman’s tax and fscal policy chair. By BRIAN A. HOWEY Unlike former House INDIANAPOLIS – The timing of Senate minority leader Scott President Pro Tempore David Long’s retirement Pelath, who wouldn’t announcement, coming even vote on a suc- in the middle of this ses- cessor, Long is likely sion, was the big surprise to play a decisive on Tuesday. But those of role here. As one us who read Statehouse hallway veteran ob- tea leaves, the notion served, “I think Da- that Long would follow vid will play a large his wife, Melissa, into the sunset was a change and positive role in of the guard realization that began to take shape choosing his succes- with Long’s sine die speech last April. sor. That’s a good For just the third time since 1980, this thing in my view. sets up a succession dynamic that will be fasci- He is clear-eyed and nating. Here are several key points to consider: knows fully what is n Long is taking a systemic approach to Senate President Pro Tem David Long said Tuesday, required of anyone reshaping the Senate with the reality that after “No one is indispensible” and “you know when it’s in that role. And ... November, he, Luke Kenley and Brandt Hersh- time to step down. -
2018 General Election Report by IBRG (Update15)
A report to supporters and members of Indiana Business for Responsive Government (IBRG), the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, and allied organizations. This report will be updated as additional election results are received in the hours and days following. Tumultuous Political Environment Nets Solid Election Wins Indiana Business for Responsive Government (IBRG), the non-partisan political action program of the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, scored a very successful general election. 70 of 74 IBRG- endorsed candidates facing opposition were victorious. Twenty-one (21) additional endorsed candidates did not face general election challenges. Considerable excitement and upheaval in the Indiana electorate this mid-term election certainly created rough waves and realignments around the state. However, in the end there were few ultimate changes in the political status quo for both candidates and seats held by the parties. Republicans swept all statewide races by significant margins, led by an unexpectedly large double-digit margin victory by Mike Braun for the U.S. Senate seat. In the General Assembly, Republican majorities took a relatively modest hit, but not enough to lose super-majority status. In the House, three (3) incumbent GOP legislators were defeated, resulting in a net breakdown of a 67-33 GOP majority. In the Senate, the Republican super-majority was reduced by just one seat to 40-10 with the defeat of notorious Sen. Mike Delph (R-Carmel). Although the final tally changed little, the Senate battlefield was intense and involved more competitive races than seen in the last decade. It’s very hard to look at the 2018 midterms in Indiana state legislative races as a “status quo” election, even though the number of seats changing was minimal. -
INDIANA BLACK LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS 2021 Justice Reform Legislative Agenda
INDIANA BLACK LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS 2021 Justice Reform Legislative Agenda Indiana General Assembly IBLC 2021 Legislative Agenda SAVE LIVES Juvenile Delinquency Matters | Senator Taylor Provides that the juvenile court may exercise jurisdiction over a child who: (1) is at least 16 years of age and is charged with certain more serious offenses; or (2) has a previous adult conviction and is alleged to have committed an offense that would be a felony if committed by an adult. Provides for automatic expungement of a delinquency adjudication if the delinquent act: (1) did not result in bodily injury to another person; and (2) is not a sex offense. [SB 191] No-Knock Warrants | Senator Melton Makes changes to standard operating procedures around the use of no-knock warrants by law enforcement. It prohibits law enforcement to make forcible entry into the premises to be searched without a warrant specifically authorizing forcible entry. [SB 269] Ban on Chokeholds | Senator Melton Defines "chokehold" and prohibits the use of a chokehold to effect an arrest. [SB 344] Prohibited Crowd Control Practices | Senator Melton Prohibits law enforcement officers from using a kinetic energy projectile or a chemical agent to disperse a lawful: (1) assembly; (2) demonstration; (3) protest; or (4) other gathering of people. Prohibits the deliberate targeting of a person's head or neck when using or deploying a kinetic energy projectile or a chemical agent. Prohibits the use of a kinetic energy projectile or chemical agent for curfew enforcement purposes. [SB 391] Ban on Racial Profiling | Representative Pryor Prohibits law enforcement from racial profiling or conducting unlawful pretextual stops. -
Box V. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc
Cite as: 587 U. S. ____ (2019) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES KRISTINA BOX, COMMISSIONER, INDIANA DEPART- MENT OF HEALTH, ET AL. v. PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY, INC., ET AL. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 18–483. Decided May 28, 2019 PER CURIAM. Indiana’s petition for certiorari argues that the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit incorrectly invalidated two new provisions of Indiana law: the first relating to the disposition of fetal remains by abortion providers; and the second barring the knowing provision of sex-, race-, or disability-selective abortions by abortion providers. See Ind. Code §§16−34−2−1.1(a)(1)(K), 16−34−3−4(a), 16−34− 4−4, 16−34−4−5, 16−34−4−6, 16−34−4−7, 16−34− 4−8, 16−41−16−4(d), 16−41−16−5 (2018). We reverse the judgment of the Seventh Circuit with respect to the first question presented, and we deny the petition with respect to the second question presented. I The first challenged provision altered the manner in which abortion providers may dispose of fetal remains. Among other changes, it excluded fetal remains from the definition of infectious and pathological waste, §§16−41−16−4(d), 16−41−16−5, thereby preventing incin- eration of fetal remains along with surgical byproducts. It also authorized simultaneous cremation of fetal remains, §16−34−3−4(a), which Indiana does not generally allow for human remains, §23−14−31−39(a). -
Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment
Case 1:18-cv-01904-SEB-MJD Document 297 Filed 10/09/20 Page 1 of 121 PageID #: 7625 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION WHOLE WOMAN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE, ) ALL-OPTIONS, INC., ) JEFFREY GLAZER M.D., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 1:18-cv-01904-SEB-MJD ) CURTIS T. HILL, JR. Attorney General of the ) State of Indiana, in his official capacity, ) KRISTINA BOX Commissioner of the Indiana ) State Department of Health, in her official ) capacity, ) JOHN STROBEL M.D., President of the ) Indiana Medical Licensing Board of Indiana, ) in his official capacity, ) KENNETH P. COTTER St. Joseph County ) Prosecutor, in his official capacity and as ) representative of a class of all Indiana ) prosecuting attorneys with authority to ) prosecute felony and misdemeanor offenses, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ) CORRECTION, Marion Superior Court, ) ) Interested Parties. ) ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiffs Whole Woman’s Health Alliance, All-Options, Inc., and Jeffrey Glazer, M.D. (collectively, "Plaintiffs") have sued Defendants Curtis T. Hill, Jr., Attorney General of Indiana; Kristina Box, M.D., Commissioner of the Indiana State Department 1 Case 1:18-cv-01904-SEB-MJD Document 297 Filed 10/09/20 Page 2 of 121 PageID #: 7626 of Health; John Strobel, M.D., President of the Medical Licensing Board of Indiana; and Kenneth P. Cotter, St. Joseph County Prosecutor ("the State") under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, challenging as unconstitutional a wide array of Indiana's statutory and regulatory restrictions on providing and obtaining abortions. More specifically, Plaintiffs allege that Indiana's legal regime for the regulation of abortion violates the Substantive Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (Count I), the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (Count II), and the Freedom of Speech Clause of the First Amendment (Count III). -
Supreme Court of the United States Kristina Box, Commissioner, Indiana Depart- Ment of Health, Et Al
Cite as: 587 U. S. ____ (2019) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES KRISTINA BOX, COMMISSIONER, INDIANA DEPART- MENT OF HEALTH, ET AL . v. PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY, INC., ET AL . ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 18–483. Decided May 28, 2019 PER CURIAM. Indiana’s petition for certiorari argues that the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit incorrectly invalidated two new provisions of Indiana law: the first relating to the disposition of fetal remains by abortion providers; and the second barring the knowing provision of sex-, race-, or disability-selective abortions by abortion providers. See Ind. Code §§16−34−2−1.1(a)(1)(K), 16−34−3−4(a), 16−34− 4−4, 16−34−4−5, 16−34−4−6, 16−34−4−7, 16−34− 4−8, 16−41−16−4(d), 16−41−16−5 (2018). We reverse the judgment of the Seventh Circuit with respect to the first question presented, and we deny the petition with respect to the second question presented. I The first challenged provision altered the manner in which abortion providers may dispose of fetal remains. Among other changes, it excluded fetal remains from the definition of infectious and pathological waste, §§16−41−16−4(d), 16−41−16−5, thereby preventing incin- eration of fetal remains along with surgical byproducts. It also authorized simultaneous cremation of fetal remains, §16−34−3−4(a), which Indiana does not generally allow for human remains, §23−14−31−39(a). -
Holt Atherton Special Collections Ms4: Brubeck Collection
HOLT ATHERTON SPECIAL COLLECTIONS MS4: BRUBECK COLLECTION SERIES 1: PAPERS SUBSERIES E: CLIPPINGS BOX 3a : REVIEWS, 1940s-1961 1.E.3.1: REVIEWS, 1940s a- “Jazz Does Campus Comeback but in new Guise it’s a ‘Combo,’” Oakland Tribune, 3-24-47 b- Jack Egan. “Egan finds jury…,” Down Beat, 9-10-47 c- “Local boys draw comment,” <n.s.> [Chicago], 12-1-48 d- Edward Arnow. “Brubeck recital is well-received,” Stockton Record, 1-18-49 e- Don Roessner. “Jazz meets J.S. Bach in the Bay Region,” SF Chronicle, 2- 13-49 f- Robert McCary. “Jazz ensemble in first SF appearance,” SF Chronicle, 3-6- 49 g- Clifford Gessler. “Snap, skill mark UC jazz concert,” <n.s.> [Berkeley CA], n.d. [4-49] h- “Record Reviews---DB Trio on Coronet,” Metronome, 9-49, pg. 31 i- Keith Jones. “Exciting and competent, says this critic,” Daily Californian, 12- 6-49 j- Kenneth Wastell. “Letters to the editor,” Daily Californian, 12-8-49 k- Dick Stewart. “Letters to the editor,” Daily Californian, 12-9-49 l- Ken Wales. “Letters to the editor,” Daily Californian, 12-14-49 m- “Record Reviews: The Month’s best [DB Trio on Coronet],” Metronome, Dec. 1949 n- “Brubeck Sounds Good” - 1949 o- Ralph J. Gleason, “Local Units Give Frisco Plenty to Shout About,” Down Beat, [1949?] 1.E.3.2: REVIEWS, 1950 a- “Record Reviews: Dave Brubeck Trio,” Down Beat, 1-27-50 b- Bill Greer, "A Farewell to Measure from Bach to Bop," The Crossroads, January 1950, Pg. 13 c- Keith Jones. “Dave Brubeck,” Bay Bop, [San Francisco] 2-15-50 d- “Poetic License in Jazz: Brubeck drops in on symphony forum, demonstrates style with Bach-flavored bop,” The Daily Californian, 2-27-50 e- Barry Ulanov. -
Directory of Indiana State, County, City and Town Officials Responsible for Road and Street Work
2018 Directory of Indiana State, County, City and Town Officials Responsible for Road and Street Work Publication No. INLTAP-RP-1-2018 What is Indiana LTAP? Indiana Local Technical Assistance Program (LTAP) was estab- lished by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The purpose of the LTAP program is to translate the latest, state- of-the-art road, highway, and bridge technologies into systems usable by local highway agencies. LTAP is funded by FHWA, the local agency distribution of the Motor Vehicle Highway Account, and Purdue University. This directory is published annually by the Indiana LTAP office at Purdue University. Vision Statement The vision of the Local Technical Assistance Program is to be known and respected throughout the State of Indiana as the primary resource for training, technical assistance, and tech- nology transfer for government and industry officials with local transportation related responsibilities, and to be known throughout the LTAP community as an innovative, aggressive, and productive participant. Mission Statement The mission of the Indiana Local Technical Assistance Program is to foster a safe, efficient, environmentally sound transporta- tion system by improving the skills and knowledge of local transportation providers through training, technical assistance, and technology transfer. Cover photo credit: iStock by Getty Images INDIANA COUNTY CODES 1 Adams 47 Lawrence 2 Allen 48 Madison 3 Bartholomew 49 Marion 4 Benton 50 Marshall 5 Blackford 51 Martin 6 Boone 52 Miami 7 Brown 53 Monroe 8 Carroll 54 Montgomery 9 Cass 55 Morgan 10 Clark 56 Newton 11 Clay 57 Noble 12 Clinton 58 Ohio 13 Crawford 59 Orange 14 Daviess 60 Owen 15 Dearborn 61 Parke 16 Decatur 62 Perry 17 Dekalb 63 Pike 18 Delaware 64 Porter 19 Dubois 65 Posey 20 Elkhart 66 Pulaski 21 Fayette 67 Putnam 22 Floyd 68 Randolph 23 Fountain 69 Ripley 24 Franklin 70 Rush 25 Fulton 71 St. -
Democratic Money
Democratic Money: A Populist Perspective with Lawrence Goodwyn and William Greider Remarks presented on the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the Populist Sub-Treasury Plan for financial reform 9 December 1989, St. Louis, Missouri Introduction by Tom Schlesinger Director, Southern Finance Project It was a resigned, plaintive-sounding analogy but it spoke volumes about the roaring ’80s. "I don’t think it is healthy to have this dramatic concentration of financial power," investment banker Felix Rohatyn told the New York Times in 1988. "But it’s just like the nuclear age, you can never uninvent the atomic bomb any more than you can uninvent these astronomical capital markets." Maybe so. But Mr. Rohatyn’s financial world, for all its explosive effects on American society in the past decade, has proven to be eerily fragile as well as inordinately powerful. In fact, that world is no more permanent than those created by the crop lien system in the 1880s or stock watering in the 1920s. To reckon with a system that appears to have spun so majestically out of control, it helps to consider America’s historical record of financial disorders -- and of ordinary citizens organizing themselves to "uninvent" the problem. There’s no more telling example than the Gilded Age and the biracial agrarian firestorm it provoked called Populism. The Populist movement built itself on a model of economic cooperation intended to combat the two sources of financial pressure that plagued farm communities 100 years ago -- vise-like credit conditions and a pinched, inflexible currency. By the end of the 1880s, hundreds of thousands of Americans had been drawn to Populism’s organizational seedbed, the Farmers Alliance, through its cooperatives and vibrant system of grassroots education. -
Suspicious Perinatal Death and the Law: Criminalising Mothers Who Do Not Conform
Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk Milne, Emma (2017) Suspicious perinatal death and the law: criminalising mothers who do not conform. PhD thesis, University of Essex. [Thesis] Final accepted version (with author’s formatting) This version is available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/22816/ Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address: [email protected] The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated. -
Suspicious Perinatal Death and the Law: Criminalising Mothers Who Do Not Conform
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Middlesex University Research Repository Suspicious perinatal death and the law: criminalising mothers who do not conform Emma Milne A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology University of Essex 2017 Acknowledgements ii Acknowledgements There are a number of people who have made this PhD possible due to their impact on my life over the course of the period of doctoral study. I would like to take this opportunity to offer my thanks. First and foremost, my parents, Lesley and Nick Milne, for their constant love, friendship, care, commitment to my happiness, and determination that I will achieve my goals and fulfil my dreams. Secondly, Professor Jackie Turton for the decade of encouragement, support (emotional and academic) and friendship, and for persuading me to start the PhD process in the first place. To Professor Pete Fussey and Dr Karen Brennan, for their intellectual and academic support. A number of people have facilitated this PhD through their professional activity. I would like to offer my thanks to all the court clerks in England and Wales who assisted me with access to case files and transcripts – especially the two clerks who trawled through court listings and schedules in order to identify two confidentialised cases for me. Professor Sally Sheldon, and Dr Imogen Jones who provided advice in relation to theory. Ben Rosenbaum and Jason Attermann who helped me decipher the politics of abortion in the US. Michele Hall who has been a constant source of support, information and assistance. -
Ethics and Globalization the Tradeoffs Underlying Our Policy Choices
ETHICS AND GLOBALIZATION The Tradeoffs Underlying Our Policy Choices A conference at the Peterson Institute for International Economics made possible by the generous support of the Stavros Niarchos Foundation and cosponsored by The New Republic Adam S. Posen, President, Peterson Institute for International Economics The Honorable Barney Frank, Congressman, D-MA, 1981–2012 (Keynote Speaker) William Galston, University of Maryland Thomas Pogge, Yale University Anne Krueger, Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies Michael Froman, The White House Dani Rodrik, Harvard University William R. Cline, Howard F. Rosen, and Ethics and Globalization: The Tradeoffs Underlying Our Policy Choices A conference at the Peterson Institute for International Economics Arvind Subramanian, Peterson Institute for Made possible by the generous support of the Stavros Niarchos Foundation International Economics Conference co-sponsored by January 7, 2013 9:15 Opening: The Need for Challenging Choices Adam Posen, Peterson Institute for International Economics 9:30 Session I - Pursuit of Domestic vs Global Welfare William Galston, University of Maryland Anne Krueger, Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies Edited by Steven R. Weisman Thomas Pogge, Yale University Arvind Subramanian, Peterson Institute for International Economics Moderator: Steven R. Weisman, Peterson Institute for International Economics 11:00 Coffee break 11:15 Session II – Balancing Economic Goals between Generations David Blanchflower, Dartmouth College William Cline, Peterson Institute for International Economics Jagadeesh Gokhale, Cato Institute Neil Howe, Center for Strategic and International Studies Moderator: Noam Scheiber, The New Republic 1:00 Lunch Address: The Honorable Barney Frank (Congressman, D-MA, 1981-2012) 2:15 Session III – Expecting Ethical Duties from Private Actors George David, Retired Chairman & CEO, United Technologies Corporation Kimberly Ann Elliott, Center for Global Development Sir Evelyn Robert de Rothschild, E.L.