RUSSIAN Emigre Press.Indd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RUSSIAN Emigre Press.Indd ALFRED ERICH SENN THE RUSSIAN ÉMIGRÉ PRESS: FROM HERZEN’S KOLOKOL TO LENIN’S ISKRA UDK 070(470 Se-88 Recenzentai: Prof. Egidijus Aleksandravičius, VDU, Lietuvių išeivijos institutas Doc. Kristina Juraitė, VDU, PMDF, Viešosios komunikacijos katedra Leidinys rekomenduotas publikuoti PMDI tarybos nutarimu Nr.16, 2008 05 20. © Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas, 2008 ISBN 978-9955-12-470-2 © Alfred Erich Senn, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction · 5 1. The Russian Free Press · 8 2. Years of Triumph · 13 3. The Young Emigration · 18 4. Elpidin’s Challenge · 23 5. Bakunin and Narodnoe delo · 28 6. The Young Fanatic From Russia · 34 7. Answering the Call · 41 8. A House on Sand · 47 9. Lavrov in London · 54 10. The Three Musketeers · 61 11. Propaganda of the Deed · 68 12. Counterattack · 74 13. The Revolutionary Movement as History · 79 14. The Group “Liberation of Labor” · 84 15. The Agony of Lev Tikhomirov · 90 16. A New Generation · 96 17. Kravchinsky’s Friends · 102 18. The Chimera of Unification · 108 19. Epilogue: The Leninist Inheritance · 114 Additional Readings · 117 INTRODUCTION The year was 1853, the place London. The two men In the early 1850s, however, Russia lay seemingly stood looking at a galley proof lying on the desk. quiet under the heavy hand of Nicholas I. Herzen The older one picked it up, and exclaimed, “My had no proof that there were readers for his publi- God! My God! That I should have lived so long! A cations. There was no underground publishing to free Russian print shop in London! This sheet, all speak of. Nevertheless, convinced of his mission, smeared with printer’s ink, wipes so many recent, he set out on uncharted waters. He was launching evil memories from my soul!” Alexander Herzen, a a great adventure. Russian émigré, and his older Polish friend, Count His gamble succeeded. In later years, he would call Stanislaw Worcell, were examining a manifesto the founding of the print shop “the best act” of his denouncing the institution of serfdom in Russia. life. “Let the whole world know,” he declaimed, At that moment Herzen knew only too well that his venture, printing texts in Russian, could result in that in the middle of the 19th century a madman, disastrous failure. The authorities in tsarist Russia believing in Russia and loving Russia, organized a would probably never let him return; at the same print shop for Russians. time he could not be sure that his publications would ever find readers in Russia. Nevertheless, It took several years and cost great effort before he wanted to send uncensored words back to his he saw any reward, but Herzen’s print shop won a homeland. special place in Russian history, and it paved the Herzen was neither the first Russian to open a way for printing and publishing in Western Europe Cyrillic print shop in the West nor the first Russian to become an important part of the revolutionary émigré to write and publish literature critical of the movement in Russia and even in the development administration of the Russian Empire. The very ori- of Russian culture as a whole. gins of secular Russian book printing lay in Peter the When he founded the Russian Free Press, Herzen Great’s decision, at the beginning of the 18th cen- did not have in mind the publication of a periodical tury, to have Russian books printed in Amsterdam. or a newspaper, but the need for a vehicle carrying In 1849 Ivan Golovin’s had authored the first anti- up to date news and commentary soon became tsarist book in Russian, Katikhizis russkogo naroda obvious. Eventually his newspaper, Kolokol (The (Catechism of the Russian People). Bell), became the standard by which later gene- The novelty of Herzen’s venture lay in his intention rations of publications were to be judged. Herzen to provide uncensored literature for the reading essentially inspired the network of Russian émigré, public within the Russian Empire. Since the time revolutionary periodicals that at the beginning of of Peter the government had maintained a tight the twentieth century culminated in the particular control of the reading material of its citizenry. The character of Vladimir Ulianov-Lenin’s Iskra (The current Tsar, Nicholas I, had declared himself the Spark). personal censor of the noted writer Alexander Pus- The editors and publishers of émigré periodicals hkin. When Peter Chaadaev wrote an unflattering had to master, or at least do battle with, the entire comparison of Russia with Western Europe, the complex of problems in creating publications: fin- authorities declared him insane and ordered him ding financial resources, collecting and culling to submit to medical supervision. When a group of manuscripts, setting type and printing texts, and of intellectuals known as the “petrashevtsy” resorted course then distributing them in the hope of finding to printing a pocket dictionary of foreign words in readers and receiving enough money to do more. order to discuss such concepts as “republic” and Herzen could rely on his own financial resources, “democracy,” the government banned the work. but his successors had to struggle and even to Herzen believed that he could create an alternative intrigue for money. Print shops in turn became 5 to the muzzled press in his homeland. intellectual and social centers, often visited even THE RUSSIAN ÉMIGRÉ PRESS: FROM HERZEN’S KOLOKOL TO LENIN’S ISKRA by tsarist police agents. The distribution networks same name. If a periodical appeared to be well always ran the danger of exposure and arrest. Over funded, émigrés automatically suspected that tsa- all hung the continuing question of defining the rist sources lay behind it. After that there remained goals of each enterprise and finding readers. the problem of marketing or, as it concerned the readership in the Russian empire, smuggling. This For the émigrés printing and publishing became an process required money and sacrifice. The émigrés important occupation. Many of the leading figures usually had little money, and they offered self- of the revolutionary movement – Herzen, Mikhail sacrifice in its stead. Bakunin, Petr Lavrov, Sergei Kravchinsky, Georgii Plekhanov, Lev Tikhomirov, Vladimir Lenin – spent There was a reciprocal relationship between opposi- time in the emigration working for one publication tional and revolutionary activity within the Russian or another. When the first major Russian Marxist empire and émigré publishing activities abroad. organization, Osvobozhdenia truda (Liberation of When overt activity in the empire picked up in the Labor), was established in Western Switzerland, its late 1870s, publishing waned and some émigrés formal birth announcement consisted in the pur- even returned home; when the government struck chase of a print shop. back, publishing abroad intensified as new waves of émigrés came to join in the work. That the Russian Marxists made their home in Swit- zerland was no accident. While émigrés might seek At the same time, in the background of émigré haven almost anywhere in Western Europe, they publishing lay a continuing debate – sometimes quickly discovered that if they wanted to publish, open, sometimes muted – as to the role to which they basically had to choose between two coun- émigrés could aspire in the Russian revolutionary tries, England or Switzerland. France and Belgium movement. There was no consensus concerning the would not tolerate such activity, and although Rus- purposes of publishing. Some wanted to view their sian liberals found that they could place their works resources as being at the service of those silenced in Germany, until the end of the century revolu- at home; others insisted that they had a message, tionaries felt unsafe there. In the choice between a truth, to deliver. Herzen had appealed to right England and Switzerland most émigrés tended to reason; others criticized him for not offering a pro- choose Switzerland because, at least in those days, gram of revolution. Bakunin called for immediate it was less expensive to live and work in the Helvetic revolt, but the revolutionaries who went to the Republic than elsewhere in Europe. people had trouble delivering their messages. Some turned to violence, but at the same time the émigrés Emigration itself posed a variety of psychological took to studying Russian society more carefully, problems. To many émigrés, going abroad meant examining the history of the country and of the to admit defeat, to acknowledge that one could no revolutionary movement and looking for practical longer remain in Russia. This might even involve theories of revolution. feelings of guilt in having deserted comrades still in the field of battle. For those who wanted to justify By the end of the century, the émigrés were con- their actions and to influence the course of events vinced that their publications had to educate the in the homeland, publishing became an important people, and Marxism was beginning to enjoy consi- activity. Their publications focused on the home- derable popularity as an explanation of social deve- land, not on news of life abroad. They were meant lopment. Many émigré writers, including in parti- to stimulate opposition to the regime in Russia. The cular V. I. Lenin, came to doubt the revolutionary uncensored word could in fact be a more powerful readiness of the masses in Russia, and they couched weapon than a bomb. their messages as directives, claiming the right to lead revolution at home. For Lenin, the periodical, The print shops usually operated on shoestring originating in the emigration, was to become the budgets; Herzen sank a good part of his personal skeleton of the party organization that was to bring fortune into his print shop, but no one else had about revolution. such resources. Once the type had been set – per- haps only a signature, 16 pages, at a time – the In the 1880s the émigrés found new markets as wes- shop manager would probably have to send it out tern audiences wanted more and more information to a local printer, maybe not even a socialist, and about the sensational news coming out of Russia.
Recommended publications
  • Marx and History: the Russian Road and the Myth of Historical Determinism
    Ciências Sociais Unisinos 57(1):78-86, janeiro/abril 2021 Unisinos - doi: 10.4013/csu.2021.57.1.07 Marx and history: the Russian road and the myth of historical determinism Marx e a história: a via russa e o mito do determinismo histórico Guilherme Nunes Pires1 [email protected] Abstract This paper aims to point out the limits of the historical determinism thesis in Marx’s thought by analyzing his writings on the Russian issue and the possibility of a “Russian road” to socialism. The perspective of historical determinism implies that Marx’s thought is supported by a unilinear view of social evolution, i.e. history is understood as a succes- sion of modes of production and their internal relations inexorably leading to a classless society. We argue that in letters and drafts on the Russian issue, Marx opposes to any attempt associate his thought with a deterministic conception of history. It is pointed out that Marx’s contact with the Russian populists in the 1880s provides textual ele- ments allowing to impose limits on the idea of historical determinism and the unilinear perspective in the historical process. Keywords: Marx. Historical Determinism. Unilinearity. Russian Road. Resumo O objetivo do presente artigo é apontar os limites da tese do determinismo histórico no pensamento de Marx, através da análise dos escritos sobre a questão russa e a possibilidade da “via russa” para o socialismo. A perspectiva do determinismo histórico compreende que o pensamento de Marx estaria amparado por uma visão unilinear da evolução social, ou seja, a história seria compreendida por uma sucessão de modos de produção e suas relações internas que inexoravelmente rumaria a uma sociedade sem classes sociais.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction 11. I Have Approached This Subject in Greater Detail in J. D
    NOTES Introduction 11. I have approached this subject in greater detail in J. D. White, Karl Marx and the Intellectual Origins of Dialectical Materialism (Basingstoke and London, 1996). 12. V. I. Lenin, Collected Works, Vol. 38, p. 180. 13. K. Marx, Grundrisse, translated by M. Nicolaus (Harmondsworth, 1973), p. 408. 14. N. I. Ziber, Teoriia tsennosti i kapitala D. Rikardo v sviazi s pozdneishimi dopolneniiami i raz"iasneniiami. Opyt kritiko-ekonomicheskogo issledovaniia (Kiev, 1871). 15. N. G. Chernyshevskii, ‘Dopolnenie i primechaniia na pervuiu knigu politicheskoi ekonomii Dzhon Stiuarta Millia’, Sochineniia N. Chernyshevskogo, Vol. 3 (Geneva, 1869); ‘Ocherki iz politicheskoi ekonomii (po Milliu)’, Sochineniia N. Chernyshevskogo, Vol. 4 (Geneva, 1870). Reprinted in N. G. Chernyshevskii, Polnoe sobranie sochineniy, Vol. IX (Moscow, 1949). 16. Arkhiv K. Marksa i F. Engel'sa, Vols XI–XVI. 17. M. M. Kovalevskii, Obshchinnoe zemlevladenie, prichiny, khod i posledstviia ego razlozheniia (Moscow, 1879). 18. Marx to the editorial board of Otechestvennye zapiski, November 1877, in Karl Marx Frederick Engels Collected Works, Vol. 24, pp. 196–201. 19. Marx to Zasulich, 8 March 1881, in Karl Marx Frederick Engels Collected Works, Vol. 24, pp. 346–73. 10. It was published in the journal Vestnik Narodnoi Voli, no. 5 (1886). 11. D. Riazanov, ‘V Zasulich i K. Marks’, Arkhiv K. Marksa i F. Engel'sa, Vol. 1 (1924), pp. 269–86. 12. N. F. Daniel'son, ‘Ocherki nashego poreformennogo obshch- estvennogo khoziaistva’, Slovo, no. 10 (October 1880), pp. 77–143. 13. N. F. Daniel'son, Ocherki nashego poreformennogo obshchestvennogo khozi- aistva (St Petersburg, 1893). 14. V. V. Vorontsov, Sud'by kapitalizma v Rossii (St Petersburg, 1882).
    [Show full text]
  • Graduate Review of History
    PastGraduate Review Tense of History Volume 5, Issue 1 | Spring 2017 Graduate Review of History Authors who publish with Past Tense agree to the following terms: Past Tense Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simulta- neously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-ex- clusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institu- tional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to share their work online (e.g., in institutional reposi- tories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Past Tense Graduate Review of History is published online by the Graduate History Society at the University of Toronto at www.pasttensejournal.com. Copyright © 2017 by the Authors All rights reserved First Published April 2017 Typeface Herr Von Muellerhoff and Minion Pro Cover design by Katie Davis Volume 5, Issue 1 Layout design by Eriks Bredovskis Spring 2017 Table of Contents Volume 5, Issue 1 Letter from the Editors............................................................................................vi Review of
    [Show full text]
  • Peasant Identities in Russia's Turmoil
    PEASANT IDENTITIES IN RUSSIA’S TURMOIL: STATUS, GENDER, AND ETHNICITY IN VIATKA PROVINCE, 1914-1921 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Aaron Benyamin Retish, M.A. The Ohio State University, 2003 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor David Hoffmann, Adviser Professor Eve Levin _________________ Professor Nicholas Breyfogle Adviser Department of History Copyright by Aaron Benyamin Retish 2003 ABSTRACT From 1914-21, the Russian countryside underwent an enormous social and political transformation. World War I and civil war led to conscription into the tsarist, Bolshevik, and anti-Bolshevik armies, removing over fourteen million young male peasants from their villages. Revolution destroyed the centuries-old peasant-landlord relationship, redistributed land among the peasantry, democratized the countryside, and allowed villages to install autonomous governing bodies. War and social turmoil also brought massive famine and government requisitioning of grain and possessions, killing thousands of peasants and destroying their means of existence. The Bolshevik victory, a defining event of the twentieth century, was ultimately determined by the temporary support of the peasantry, the vast majority of Russia's population. This project studies the interaction between peasants and government in the Russian province of Viatka from the beginning of World War I to the end of the Civil War in 1921. In doing so, it will advance how scholars understand the nature of the Revolution, peasant-state relations, and peasant society and culture in general. On the ii one hand, I analyze Russia’s changes through a study of peasant responses to tsarist, Provisional Government, and Soviet recruitment into the armed forces; requisitioning of grain and possessions; and establishment of local administrations.
    [Show full text]
  • Stalin: from Terrorism to State Terror, 1905-1939 Matthew Alw Z St
    St. Cloud State University theRepository at St. Cloud State Culminating Projects in History Department of History 5-2017 Stalin: From Terrorism to State Terror, 1905-1939 Matthew alW z St. Cloud State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/hist_etds Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Walz, Matthew, "Stalin: From Terrorism to State Terror, 1905-1939" (2017). Culminating Projects in History. 10. https://repository.stcloudstate.edu/hist_etds/10 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at theRepository at St. Cloud State. It has been accepted for inclusion in Culminating Projects in History by an authorized administrator of theRepository at St. Cloud State. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Stalin: From Terrorism to State Terror, 1905-1939 by Matthew Walz A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of St. Cloud State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History May, 2017 Thesis Committee: Marie Seong-Hak Kim, Chairperson Mary Wingerd Edward Greaves Plamen Miltenoff 2 Abstract While scholars continue to debate the manner in which the Great Terror took shape in the Soviet Union, Stalin’s education as a revolutionary terrorist leader from 1905-1908 is often overlooked as a causal feature. This thesis analyzes the parallels between the revolutionary terrorists in Russia in the first decade of the twentieth century, particularly within Stalin’s Red Brigade units, and the henchmen carrying out the Great Terror of the 1930s. Both shared characteristics of loyalty, ruthlessness and adventurism while for the most part lacking any formal education and existing in a world of paranoia.
    [Show full text]
  • Workers and Intelligentsia in Late Imperial Russia: Realities, Representations, Reflections
    Workers and Intelligentsia in Late Imperial Russia: Realities, Representations, Reflections Edited by Reginald E. Zelnik Description: The collapse of the Soviet Union opened previously unimagined possibilities for insight into Russian social, intellectual, and political history. This volume, a collaboration of American, Russian, and West European scholars, illuminates the creation and complex dynamics of the Russian industrial working class from its peasant origins in the mid-nineteenth century to the collapse of the imperial system in 1917. The authors focus on the shifting attitudes, cultural norms, self-representations, and increasing self-consciousness of workers as they interacted with the new social movements, student groups, the Church, and most dramatically, the political (mainly radical and liberal) intelligentsia. But the authors also examine the obverse: the contending representations of workers by the intelligentsia as they interacted with each other ever more intensely during this turbulent period leading up to the Russian Revolution. The result is a fascinating and detailed account of social and cultural transformation in a key period of Russian — and world — history. RESEARCH SERIES / NUMBER 101 WORKERS AND INTELLIGENTSIA IN LATE IMPERIAL RUSSIA: REALITIES, REPRESENTATIONS, REFLECTIONS REGINALD E. ZELNIK, EDITOR UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY Three of the essays in this book have been published in somewhat different forms as journal articles. The essay by S. A. Smith first appeared (as part of a larger study of St. Petersburg and Shanghai) in International Review of Social History 41 (1996). The essay by William G. Rosenberg first appeared in Slavic Review 55 (1997). The essay by E. Anthony Swift first appeared in Russian History/Histoire Russe 23 (1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Argues Orlando Patter
    MEMORY AND MYTHMAKING: POST- EMANCIPATION LITERARY PORTRAYALS OF PEASANTS IN RUSSSIA AND FREEDMEN IN THE AMERICAN SOUTH Amanda Brickell Bellows A thesis submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2011 Approved by: W. Fitzhugh Brundage Louise McReynolds Heather Williams i © 2011 Amanda Brickell Bellows ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT AMANDA BRICKELL BELLOWS: Memory and Myth-Making: Post- Emancipation Literary Portrayals of Peasants in Russia and Freedmen in the American South (Under the direction of W. Fitzhugh Brundage and Louise McReynolds) This paper examines the different relationships that emerged from ostensibly parallel shifts in relative power after the abolition of serfdom in Russia and slavery in the United States. As Russian and Southern elites grappled with the political, economic, and social changes catalyzed by the elimination of these entrenched institutions, they presented and promoted divergent portrayals of the former serfs and slaves in fictional literature; these depictions are encompassed within the South’s Lost Cause myth and Russia’s Peasant myth. The emergence of disparate myths indicates that the post-emancipation power relations that developed between the masters and their former bondsmen in each region differed radically. More broadly, this comparison explores the causal processes that lead to the creation of myths, the function of myths in societies, and the ways in which changing political and economic factors shape the power relationships between individuals. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 II. LITERARY MANIFESTATIONS OF THE MYTH OF THE LOST CAUSE ..........
    [Show full text]
  • Nikolai Nekrasov's Representation of the Decembrist Wives
    Anna Biel Nikolai Nekrasov’s Representation of the Decembrist Wives In On Poetics, Aristotle formulated the fundamental difference between the his- torian and the poet, which rested on their varying perception and representation of historical truth: The difference between an historian and a poet is not in that one writes in prose and the other in verse… The real difference is this that one tells what happened and the other what might happen. For this reason poetry is something more scientific and serious than history, because poetry tends to give general truths while history gives particular facts.1 Aristotle’s conceptualization of the poet, as opposed to the historian, and of his creative process of capturing historical reality illuminates Nikolai Nekrasov’s painstaking work on the poem Russian Women (1872–73), which combines his- torical accuracy with poetic imagination. By applying, consciously or intuitively, the Aristotelian vision of poetry as the general truth which eclipses historical specifics, Nekrasov creates a poem that is filled with inherent ambiguities of style, subject matter, and genre. The poem is awash with historical inaccuracies, which inevitably point to the poet’s mythol- ogization of the Decembrist wives and their feat. Nekrasov’s Decembrist wives emerge as both revolutionaries and guardian angels; the poem’s lofty theme of the noblewomen’s voluntary self-sacrifice is glaringly incongruous with its low style of expression. And yet, despite its many contradictions, Nekrasov’s poem has become the standard point of reference in Russian scholarship on the Decembrist wives and remains one of the most popular and most influential literary works that have shaped the perception of them among Russians.2 1 Aristotle, On Poetics (Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1991), 35.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 333 Humanities and Social Sciences: Novations, Problems, Prospects (HSSNPP 2019) Theoretical Views and Social Democratic Activities of G.V. Plekhanov Zhuravleva G.P. Kornilova I.M. Scientific School “Economic Theory” Academic Department of History and Philosophy Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (PRUE) Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (PRUE) Moscow, Russia Moscow, Russia [email protected] [email protected] Kovnir V.N. Koroleva E.I. Academic Department of Political Economy and History of Academic Department of Catering Business Economic Science Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (PRUE) Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (PRUE) Moscow, Russia Moscow, Russia [email protected] [email protected] Cherednichenko O.V. Academic Department of Economic Theory Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (PRUE) Moscow, Russia [email protected] Abstract—Theoretical views of G.V. Plekhanov on the future is the achievement of the Russian thought. In this regard, it is of mankind still evokes undoubted interest. As an encyclopedic fair to recall the contribution of G.V. Plekhanov in the world personality himself, he brought up a large pleiad of brilliant minds treasury of ideas. Acquaintance with his works shows the who successfully represented Russia in various fields of knowledge exceptional depth and seriousness of thinking, the breadth of - economics, philosophy, literature and art. And now, in the encyclopedic knowledge of the outstanding Russian thinker. modern world, his ideas do not age. In this regard, the purpose of the study is to analyze the life of the great man, his views, doubts, throwing, position. The main methods of research are the method II.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Perspectives and Ideological Origins ➤ 25 Term Zealot, Used to Describe Uncompromising Devotion to Radical Change, Is Derived from the Name of This Group
    Historical CHAPTER 2 Perspectives and Ideological Origins Terrorism has been a dark feature of human behavior since history was first recorded. Great leaders have been assassinated, groups and individuals have committed acts of incredible violence, and entire cities and nations have been put to the sword—all in the name of defending a greater good. The modern era of terrorism is primarily, though not exclusively, a conflict between adversaries waging, on one side, a self-described war on terrorism and, on the other, a self-described holy war in defense of their religion. It is an active confrontation, evidenced by the fact that the incidence of significant terrorist attacks often spikes to serious levels. Although such trends are disturbing, it is critical for one to keep these facts in perspective because the modern terrorist environment is in no manner a unique circumstance in human history. It will become clear in the following pages that the history of terrorist behavior extends into antiquity and that themes and concepts recur. State terrorism, dissident terrorism, and other types of political violence are common to all periods of civilization. It will also become clear to readers that certain justifications —rooted in basic beliefs—have been used to rationalize terrorist violence throughout history. The following themes are introduced here: • Historical perspectives on terrorism • Ideological origins of terrorism • September 11, 2001, and the new era of terrorism v Historical Perspectives on Terrorism It is perhaps natural for each generation to view history narrowly, from within its own political context. Contemporary commentators and laypersons tend to interpret modern events as though they have no historical precedent.
    [Show full text]
  • Problems of Modernization in Late Imperial Russia: Maksim M
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Louisiana State University Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2005 Problems of modernization in late imperial Russia: Maksim M. Kovalevskii on social and economic reform Evgeny Badredinov Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Badredinov, Evgeny, "Problems of modernization in late imperial Russia: Maksim M. Kovalevskii on social and economic reform" (2005). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 2170. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/2170 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. PROBLEMS OF MODERNIZATION IN LATE IMPERIAL RUSSIA: MAKSIM M. KOVALEVSKII ON SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC REFORM A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Evgeny Badredinov B.A., Russian Academy of Theatre Arts, 1993 M.A., Louisiana State University, 2000 December 2005 Acknowledgments I dedicate this work to Professor Thomas C. Owen, my advisor, teacher, and colleague, who has been my role model and inspiration over all these years that I have been a doctoral student. He taught me rigorous standards of academic writing and research.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Leninism and Bolshevism Are Not the Same
    RUSSIAN REVOLUTION CENTENARY SPECIAL Why Leninism and Bolshevism Are Not the Same Marcel Van Der Linden The essay closely investigates and questions the istorically, in the debate on Leninism1 three controver- assumptions that Leninist theory is more or less a sial positions have usually been taken up. Some claim that Leninism proved its usefulness in the Russian consistent whole, which must be accepted or rejected in H October Revolution and that the same model should, therefore, its entirety, and that Bolshevik policy under Tsarism was also be applied elsewhere; others propose that Leninism was the direct result of Leninist theory—that Bolshevism suited to the Russian circumstances at the beginning of the and Leninism are synonyms. It tries to determine the 20th century, but not to present day conditions in other coun- tries; fi nally, yet another group thinks that, as early as in the position of Lenin’s theory in its historical-materialist pre-revolutionary situation, Leninism carried within itself the context, concentrating on his method of analysis and his seeds of the later Stalinist degeneration and should, therefore, theories of proletarian consciousness and the be rejected in all circumstances. revolutionary party. It then deduces some important These three positions appear to differ widely from each other. Even so, they have two assumptions in common: that internal inconsistencies in Lenin’s methodology and Leninist theory is more or less a consistent whole, which must organisational theory, and attempts to prove that be accepted or rejected in its entirety; and that Bolshevik policy Bolshevik practice was in no way Leninist.
    [Show full text]