DOCSLIB.ORG

Atlantic Gateway Parklands the Landscape for Prosperity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Atlantic Gateway Parklands the Landscape for Prosperity Atlantic Gateway Parklands The Landscape for Prosperity Version 1.0 — June 14 Contents Part 1: Introduction – Accelerating Growth City Growth 8 Adding Value Through Partnership 10 Atlantic Gateway: Priority Themes 12 A Timeline of the Atlantic Gateway Parklands Region 14 Atlantic Gateway Investment Priorities 18 Part 2: Altantic Gateway Parklands The Context 20 The Evidence Base 22 The Approach 32 Part 3: Parklands PLACE and Projects Parklands PLACE 34 Strategic Environment Initiatives 36 Emergent Environmental Initiatives 42 Existing Landscape Assets 44 Strategic Flood Defence 46 Water Quality Investments 48 Part 4: Next Steps Delivering the Benefits 50 Community Environment Fund 52 Conclusion 54 Map 59 2 3 Preface “If anywhere in the UK can develop the Greening supports growth critical mass and momentum to become What can the landscape and sustainable development an alternative growth pole to London, it is offer Atlantic Gateway and its great towns and cities? Atlantic Gateway.” How can we use the environment and our natural assets to underpin sustainable growth? The economy Lord Heseltine and Sir Terry Leahy is the wholly owned subsidiary of the environment: Our ‘Landscape for Prosperity’ centres on the concept that nature can support growth if it is seen as an opportunity Atlantic Gateway – a sustainable future and not a constraint. Atlantic Gateways’s coast, rivers, canals and land are valuable assets: the key to smart Manchester and Liverpool were at the epicentre of and resilient development. the world’s first Industrial Revolution. Now they are leaders in the transformation from grey to green. Only Resilience 50km apart, the cities have global reach and impact. The Liverpool-Manchester corridor – Atlantic Gateway The environment can support adaptation to, and – has a £50bn economy, a population of six million and mitigation of, climate change and flooding. Wildlife and ambitious plans for 250,000 jobs and £14bn of new natural systems deliver direct benefits by cleaning our investment by 2030. air and water, benefitting the visitor economy. Nature makes places look better, encouraging investors and Atlantic Gateway Partnership prioritises five themes to attracting the best knowledge workers. It can form focus the acceleration of growth over the next fifteen spaces for play, and for leisure; leading to healthier years: communities and reduced costs of illness. It’s where we grow food, manage water, and source our raw 1. Growth materials. 2. Connectivity Improving the environment employs people, supports business and creates jobs. And there are a host of 3. Infrastructure secondary industrial sectors that rely on sustainability and a healthy environment for their water supplies, 4. Sustainability energy and raw materials, or which can be badly disrupted when things go wrong. 5. Skills and training This prospectus makes the case for Atlantic Gateway ‘Atlantic Gateway Parklands – the Landscape for Parklands – the Landscape for Prosperity. Prosperity’ sets out the vision and ambition to make places investable and liveable through an exceptional environment. Making the best of the assets on our doorstep will unlock barriers to sustainable growth. “The issue of sustainability is here to stay.” Lord Heseltine “Entrepreneurs look for talented workers and the amenities that these workers like.” Richard Florida Photography: Mark Louden© www.markloudon.com Atlantic Gateway Parklands - the landscape for prosperity 4 5 R o o c c h h L ll d e Rive Irwe e r a d Leeds and l s Li e a v C n e r a d p L o n 35 i a v v o e e l l r r C p p a o o R o o D iv n al er l l Ir w ell Ca n a l A C 33 30 Ashton Canal 19 P S 18 e a a n k k Manchester e F y 14 34 B 15 o 1 r r oo e s k s t St Helens 20 t C 13 C a a n River y n a 23 Merse a l l 2 ub ern H North 12 24 R 3 Liverpool Warrington iv er G oyt 29 36 Birkenhead 16 10/11 Manchester Ship Canal ridgewate B r Ca Widnes n al 17 Macclesfield Canal R A iv 27 e 7 26 r 21 M 9 e 5 8 rs Runcorn ey 22 4 2 R S iv v e H i R er r D ea B n o l 6 l i l n na Ca Ship A ester Tr anch e Ellesmere M n 25 R t iv & Port er Me We rs aver e y C an al 28 anal C 32 The Landscape n o i n U e for Prosperity r i h h s s p River Dee p ver D o o Ri ane r r h h S S Chester 31 Atlantic Gateway Projects Parklands Opportunities Labelling key 1 Liverpool2 9 Sci-Tech Daresbury Environmental Emerging Landscape Strategic Flood Defence Water Quality Major rivers Motorways and canals 2 Liverpool Waters 10 Warrington Waters Initiatives: Assets: Investments: Investments Places not visible on the map 24 3 Wirral Waters 11 Port Warrington 18 Irwell River Park Bold Forest Park 28 Northwich 31 Winsford Nantwich and Crewe 25 4 Mersey Tidal Power 12 Omega 19 Port Salford Greenway Cheshire Saltscape 29 Warrington 32 Northwich, Oakmere and Burscough Major Railways HS2 5 Liverpool John 13 Northern Hub 20 GM Wetlands 26 Port Sunlight River Park 30 Salford Cuddington Hesketh Bank roads Lennon Airport 14 Port Salford 21 Mersey Gateway Nature Park 27 Upper Mersey Valley Forest Park 33 Billinge Whaley Bridge 34 6 Ince Park 15 MediaCityUK 22 Bridgewater Way Sandon Dock 7 3MG 16 HS2 23 Greenpoint for Growth 35 Oldham / Royton www.atlanticgateway.co.uk 8 17 39 Altrincham 6 Mersey Gateway Airport City 7 Part 1: City Growth Introduction – Accelerating Rebalancing the economy Atlantic Gateway – the geography Atlantic Gateway – the proposition Atlantic Gateway is a positive response to the The geography of Atlantic Gateway is roughly that of The Atlantic Gateway proposition is that it makes imperative of rebalancing the economy. The increasing the three LEP areas – Greater Manchester, Cheshire sense to collaborate, to maximise investment into the Growth domination of the UK economy by London and and Warrington, and Liverpool. The TCPA’s ‘England’s area, enable and support the delivery of connecting the south east, and the widening gap in economic Four geographies’ is helpful. The economic geography infrastructure and champion major projects led by performance between the metropolis and ‘the north’ is demands integration of transport, digital, energy and the private sector, LEPs and others. The impact well known. The context is that of growing collaboration water infrastructure. The social geography reveals and influence of these in terms of jobs and growth between the northern city regions. stark contrasts on measures such as skills and life crosses local and regional boundaries: some have expectancy. The political geography is characterised national and international significance. The Atlantic And there is overwhelming evidence of a huge disparity by fragmentation, lack of capacity and mechanisms Gateway Partnership has been playing its part by in public sector investment in, for example, science for spatial planning on the landscape scale. The championing investments such as The Northern Hub and transport between the metropolis and the rest. environmental geography is the Mersey Basin – with rail improvements, vital to improving connectivity across According to IPPR North, on transport: the assets of coast, river and canals and the challenges the north. of climate change and resilience. “The overall pattern of planned capital investment in transport infrastructure is largely unchanged with more than 89% allocated to projects in London and the South East. Measured on a per capita basis Landscape and environment is not where government money is involved, this shows constrained by political or institutional that as a nation we are planning to spend nearly £2,600 on transport expenditure for each Londoner, boundaries. Ideas have no boundaries. 500 times as much as the £5 per person for the north east; 150 times as much as in the South West; 20 times as much as the per capita figure for the north west and over 16 times as much as in Yorkshire and Humber.” This is exemplified by debates around HS2 and exploration by initiatives such as the RSA City Growth Commission: “...individual metros cannot make decisions in isolation. There is a need for strategic decision making between, as well as within, metros and wider regions.” Drivers for cities: key factors affecting and driving the future of the Conurbations of Great Britain city (© Arup) 8 9 Adding Value Through Partnership Partnership working – the record The evolving Atlantic Gateway Partnership The concept of Parklands developed in this prospectus In common with many other unincorporated is underpinned by partnership working across the partnerships with great ambitions and very limited sectors – private, public, third and academic – working resources, its evolution has not been straightforward. together to common ends. Atlantic Gateway evolved out of concerted attempts to shape what would have been the Northwest Regional There is an impressive track record of successful Strategy 2010 and the ideas being promoted for partnership working across the Atlantic Gateway inclusion as spatial and investment priorities within it. geography in tackling challenging, long-term, apparently These included Peel Group’s Ocean Gateway vision intractable problems. One successful example was and attempts to ensure a major greening initiative – the twenty-five year Mersey Basin Campaign, leading ‘Adapting the Landscape’. The axing of the regional the transformation in water quality and enabling structures and the formation of the LEPs disrupted spectacular waterside regeneration. The regeneration progress and created political tensions. Atlantic of Liverpool’s waterfront, Manchester’s waterfront at Gateway emerged out of these uncertainties in the face Salford Quays and many other locations was stimulated of scepticism, but with growing support.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Vision for North Shore
    View from Lee - north to south Published September 2020 3 North Shore Vision I am pleased to introduce this North Shore Vision for the Liverpool Maritime Mercantile City World Heritage Site. Foreword Liverpool is a city that is undergoing a multi-billion pound renaissance and we are constantly seeking the right balance where regeneration and conservation can complement each other. We are proud of our unique heritage and have a desire to ensure that the city continues to thrive, with its historic legacy safeguarded and enhanced. On 17 July 2019, Liverpool City Council declared a Climate Change Emergency and I led a debate on the impending global ecological disaster, calling on all political parties to come together to rise to the challenge of making Liverpool a net zero carbon city by 2030. The way we do things in the future will need to change to a more sustainable model. To achieve this, the city has embraced the principles of the United Nations Development and this document sets out our ambitions for future growth and development for the North Shore area of the city firmly within this context. We have already begun work with partners to deliver that ambition. Existing and highly successful examples include the iconic Titanic Hotel redevelopment, restoration of the Tobacco Warehouse and the proposed refurbishment of the listed Engine House at Bramley Moore Dock which reinvigorate dilapidated heritage assets on the North Docks, providing access and interpretation to a new generation of people in the City. Liverpool has a well-earned reputation for being a city of firsts.
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpoo'l World Heritage Waterfront
    Albert Dock – Albert Dock and its warehouses were opened in 1846 by Prince Albert. They were designed by Jesse Hartley, the dock engineer with assistance from the architect Philip Hardwick. The dock was one of the earliest enclosed docks in the world and it is believed to form the largest group of Grade 1 Listed Buildings in England. The use and condition of the dock and warehouses declined during the 20th century, but they were comprehensively restored and converted to a mix of uses in the 1980s. They are now the most popular non- paying visitor attraction in the North West. IHBC Summer School Saturday 16th June 2007 Stanley Dock – Stanley Dock was opened in 1848 and between 1852-55 it was equipped with import warehouses of fire-proof construction similar to those at Albert Dock, all to the de- Tour signs of Jesse Hartley, the dock engineer. In 1901, the dock was partly infilled and Stanley Dock Tobacco Warehouse was constructed, using over 27 million bricks. It is believed to be the largest brick building in the world. The whole complex is disused, apart from the ground Liverpool’s World Heritage Waterfront floor of two of the warehouses, where a market is held every Sunday. Discussions are under- way with the owners to try to find a sustainable use for the buildings. Sponsored by Institute of Historic Building Conservation Summer School June 2007 World Heritage Waterfront 2.00 pm Coach leaves Liverpool Medical Institute. 2.15 pm Tate and Lyle Sugar Silo 2.20 pm Tall ships at Wellington Dock 2.25 pm Get out of coach at Stanley Dock
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Supporting Habitat Liverpool Docks Aug 2015
    Assessment of Supporting Habitat (Docks) for Use by Qualifying Features of Natura 2000 Sites in the Liverpool City Region Ornithology Report Report Ref: 4157.005 August 2015 Assessment of Supporting Habitat (Docks) for Use by Qualifying Features of Natura 2000 Sites in the Liverpool City Region Ornithology Report Document Reference: 4157.005 Version 3.0 August 2015 Prepared by: TEP Genesis Centre Birchwood Science Park Warrington WA3 7BH Tel: 01925 844004 Fax: 01925 844002 e-mail: [email protected] for: Merseyside Environmental Advisory Service First floor Merton House Stanley Road Bootle Merseyside L20 3DL Written: Checked: Approved: MW TR TR CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 2 3.0 SURVEY METHODS .............................................................................................. 11 4.0 SUMMARY SURVEY FINDINGS ............................................................................ 17 5.0 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................... 82 6.0 DISCUSSION OF IMPLICATIONS RELATING TO NATURA 2000 SITES.............. 83 7.0 REFERENCES & FURTHER READING ................................................................. 86 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Examples of Survey Sheets Appendix 2: Vantage Point Survey Coverage Appendix 3: Tabulated Raw Data Appendix 4:
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool. Reg 287
    STREET biRECTORY.J LIVERPOOL. REG 287 J(9Ma.son Samuel, chapel keeper lA, Webb Charles, shopkt-eper 162 Atlantic hotel,Rt.W.Chatham Atexand.ra Dock Station (L. & N. Ill Moore Robert, bookbinder 2 Wordsworth Jn. F. wa.rehoman 163 & 164 Howson Charles & Co. W. Railway) 113 Geoghan Thomas, printer 2 Brown Edwa.rd, corn merchant shipwrights London & N. W. Goods Station 115 Holmes Geo. warehouseman 2 PykeJ.&Sons, warehousekeeprs Owen J os. & Sons, timber mers Public Weighing Machine 117 Gaskin Frederick, plumber 7 Dublin Arms P.H. Mrs. Annie 167 A, 8 & 76 British Workman •••• herea.re Church lit. Strand. rll. 119 Cowper William, cowkeeper Tobin Public House Co. Limited tt Lyster ra •••••• • • • • • • here is Wmtejiela ril • • • • • • • •••••••• here is Carlton st.. • • • • • • 167 Rimmer Thomas. & Son, tiro- Midland Railway Goods Station EAST SIDE. 8, 76 & 167 A, British Workman ber merchants ......... here is Grovi' at •••••••• 2 Bell John, pilot Public House Co. Limited 168 Drysdale Bros. timber mers McArthur J. P. & Co.timber mer& 4 Stanton Mrs •••..•••• here is Cotton st ·•••••••• Pierce, Watts&Co. timber mers ••••••• • here is Hemer ter ••••.••• 6 Upton Geo.Caldwell,whitesmth 9 City of DublinSteamPacketCo; Lumley, Lloyd & Co. timber WEST SIDE. 10 Wilson Henry, coml. traveller (Capt. George Robert BellR.N. merchants BROCKLEBANK 12 Spencer Thomas Joseph, pro- marine superintendent & agt) 169 Watson & Todn, timber mers DOCK Jn.T. Gould. fessor of music .... •••. here ia Dickson st •• • • .. .. London & North Western CARRIERS' DOCK dock master 14 Butler Charles Edwd. manager 14 Roach Mrs. Mary, shopkeeper Railway Co. (Canada Dock Thomason James, carrier 16 Chad wick George, insur.
    [Show full text]
  • LIVERPOOL. Doli 151
    STREET DIRECTORY.] LIVERPOOL. DOli 151 JUNG'B DOCK, entrance from SALT HOUSE DOCK, entrance W APPING DOCK,entrance from Doel street, 94 Phytbian street Wa.pping. MAP 0 9. Nearest from Wapping. MAP N 9, Wapping. MAP() 9. Station to Gloucester place. MAP J 6,K Ci, station on the Overhead railway Nearest station on the Over- here on the Overhead railway. 1 Speake William shopkeeper is Wapping. head railway is Custom house. Dock master, William Blundell; r; Croall .Jame~o, ~dealer Dock master, Willia.m Blundell ; Dock master, William Lancaster> office, Queen's dock office, Queen's dock Albert dock Dombey street (Torletb .A.hea.rn John, potato salesman WATERLOO DOCK, entrance park),29 Park rd. to Windsor st. CowleyGeo. vegetable salesman SANDON DOCK entrance from from Waterloo road. MAP J 11. MAP 8, P 6. Nearest station on the Overhea I Q Mersey Docks &Harbour Board Regent road. MAP E ll, E 12. NORTH SIDE. (tobacco warehouse) Station here on the Overhead railway is Princes Half-tide Custom House(tobacco wareho) railway dock. 1 Jones Edward David ~n Thomas, pier master ' Dock master, Owen Pritcbard.. 12 3 Baynton Mrs.Margery,aprtmta Garner George, head gate keepr Do<:k master, Ch~rles Leggett Pier head 6 Ca.mpbell Mrs. Sarab Jane, Drill Reserve & Recruiting De- Wnght J:-met>, pi~r master lodgings pOt (Capt. D. A. Crofton lt.N.) West In.du~ & Pamtie Steam Ship WELLINGTON DOCK, entrance 7 Jonei Richard, painter (H.M.S. Eagle) Co. Limrted (?ranch) . from Regent road. MAP G 11. 9 H_ill John, cashi~r :Mersey Volunteer Division, s.
    [Show full text]
  • Transactions
    TRANSACTIONS VOLUME VIII 1953-54 1954-55 R. PERRY & COMPANY LIMITED 9 0 CHURCH STREET · BIRKENHEAD Telephone: Birkenhead 16 & 8430 * SAILMAKERS SINCE BEFORE THE BATTLE OF TRAFALGAR * ESTABLISHED 1804 SHIPPING IllUSTRATED ANNUAL * On sale at every Port * in the country. PRICE TWO SHILLINGS 42 STANLEY STREET, LIVERPOOL, t F. W. WHEATLEY & Co. Ltd. ESTABLISHED 1850 Ship Factory and ORRELLO and Structural BRAND Office Painting Decorators * PAINTS * Telephone: Telegrams: North 2278 "Ochre" 41-44 REGENT ROAD • LIVERPOOL S ALL KINDS OF SEA AND TRANSIT INSURANCE UNDERTAKEN MARITIME INSURANCE CO. LTD. (The Shares of which belong to the Scottish Union and National Insurance Company) Head Office: INDIA BUILDINGS, LIVERPOOL, 2 Eslablished 1864 Birmingham Office: Manchester Office: Neville House Da:nlee Buildings Waterloo Street, 2 55 Spring Gardens, 2 London Office: LLOYD'S BUILDING, E.C.3 CLAIMS MADE PAYABLE IN ANY PART OF THE WORLD THANK GOODNESS RAGLAN CHOCOLATES (NEW! REGAL F R U I T D R 0 p S~~~~~~~~~PP•~,... ~,."~"mP~"~"Wl~"'~~~~n MUERS OF FINER CHOCOLATES AND CONFECTIONERY SINCE 1831 "Everything Men and their Sons wear" WATSON PRICI(ARD NORTH JOHN STREET · LIVERPOOL PRINCESS STREET · MANCHESTER ii "Landfall" (See page 4) (Frontispitet THE LIVERPOOL NAUTICAL RESEARCH SOCIETY "All delight is in masts and oars and trim ships to cross the stormy sea."-Odyssey. Vol. VIII TRANSACTIONS 1953-4 and 1954-5 Issued in 1957, the 750th anniversary of the grant of a charter to Liver­ pool by King John. CONTENTS Page Council and Officers 2 The Objects of the Society 2 Editorial 3 The Society Badge 4 The Clubs~ip Landfall 4 Looking Back Captain E.
    [Show full text]
  • Everton Stadium Development Limited the People's Project Bramley
    Everton Stadium Development Limited The People’s Project Bramley-Moore Dock, Liverpool Heritage Statement December 2019 Everton Stadium Development Limited, Bramley-Moore Dock : Heritage Statement Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Authorship ...................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Site Description and Context ............................................................................................................. 5 Liverpool Waters (Future Baseline) ............................................................................................... 6 Bramley-Moore Dock .................................................................................................................. 7 3 Application Proposals / Pre-Application Consultation ................................................................... 10 4 The legislative, policy and guidance context ................................................................................... 12 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 12 The Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Liverpool Wwtw (2013)
    www.WaterProjectsOnline.com Wastewater Treatment & Sewerage Liverpool WwTW United Utilities keeping the Mersey clean with the AMP5 upgrade project ollowing on from the Liverpool WwTW AMP5 Main Works Upgrade article featured in UK Water Projects 2012, Wellington Dock has been fully prepared for construction of the sequence batch reactor (SBR) plant which is Fnow underway. The project is part of the £3.6 billion being invested by United Utilities in AMP5 across the North West to improve water quality and the environment by 2015. By upgrading the existing works and constructing a sequence batch reactor, the treated water leaving the new plant will be cleaner and greener helping the continued rejuvenation of the River Mersey and ensuring it meets strict European Standards for water quality. SBR gallery with lower cells nearing completion (May 2013) - Courtesy of GCA JV Undertakings BIM (Building Information Modelling) has been used extensively on GCA JV, a joint venture between GallifordTry, Costain and Atkins the project, helping to realise benefits during the design and early working in partnership with United Utilities, was appointed as main construction phases, with further benefits in the commissioning, contractor for the following works: aftercare and long term operational and maintenance phase anticipated. • BAFF refurbishment works. • Silt removal. Sand infill • Dock closure and infill. Before construction could begin, 31,000m3 of silt was removed • Construction and commissioning of the: from the base of the Victorian dock. This was undertaken by WD SBR plant. Mersey, a trailing suction hopper dredger operated by Westminster SBR feed pumping station. Dredging. Blower building. • Inlet works modifications and sludge thickening building.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources Map for Merseyside
    90 300000 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 400000 BGS maps covering Liverpool, Knowsley, Sefton, St. Helens and Wirral 450 2 74 Inactive or unproductive Deep coal at more than 1200 m coalfield Petroleum Exploration and Shallow coal with less than PEDL Development Licence issued 50 m overburden under the Petroleum (Production) Act 1934 (as at Nov. 2005) Deep coal between 50 m MERSEYSIDE FORMBY G13 and 1200 m Hydrocarbon well (comprising City of Liverpool, Boroughs of 83 30 84 30 Knowsley, Sefton, St. Helens and Wirral) FORMBY 5 FRESHFIELD G2 Mineral Resource Information in Support of National, FRESHFIELD G1 FORMBY G38 FORMBY 6 FORMBY G37 FORMBY G46 Regional and Local Planning FORMBY G102 FORMBY 4 Mineral Resources FORMBY G59 FORMBY G101/101A Scale 1:100 000 SEFTON FLEA MOSS G2 PEDL134 FLEA MOSS G1 FORMBY G22 MUSTANG LITTLE CROSBY ST. HELENS 400 EXL273 PEDL101 GREENPARK 96 97 MUSTANG KNOWSLEY CROXTETH 2 2 2 3 LIVERPOOL Ribble Estuary CROXTETH 1 Foreshore (SiS) (Southport Shore) (SiS) EXL253 WIRRAL EASTERN/PEG EXL273 20 GREENPARK 20 PEDL116 STRATAGAS PEDL145 ISLAND GAS 425 450 EXL276 PEDL038 BIOGAS Production of this map was commissioned and funded by the Office of the ALKANE Deputy Prime Minister (Contract MP0677). PEDL038 ALKANE 1:63 360 or 1:50 000 map published Current digital availability of these sheets can be found on the British Geological Survey website: www.bgs.ac.uk SAND & GRAVEL 450 Superficial deposits Sub-alluvial: Inferred resources Glaciofluvial deposits PEAT 400 400 10 10 BRICK CLAY Carboniferous Brick clay and Fireclay coincident
    [Show full text]
  • Height: Miles
    Delivery Details Birkenhead (CH44 2) Residential delivery count 32232 Business delivery count 1869 Marine Lake Brocklebank Dock Accommodation Type % CH45CH45 22 KirkdaleKirkdale L4L4 33 Detached 5.36% L20L20 8 8 NewNew BrightonBrighton BankBank HallHall Canada Dock BankBank HallHall Semi-detached 36.17% CH45CH45 9 9 L4L4 11 Terraced (including end-terrace) 33.99% CH45CH45 00 CH45CH45 1 1 KirkdaleKirkdale Purpose-Built Flats in a Residential Building 15.01% Huskisson Dock CH45CH45 L5L5 77 Converted Flat 2.21% CH45CH45 33 SandhillsSandhills CH45CH45 33 CH45CH45 5 5 SandhillsSandhills WallaseyWallasey Grove Grove Road Road Purpose-Built Flats in a Commercial Building 6.93% Sandon Half Tide Dock L5L5 99 CH45CH45 77 Wellington Dock CH45CH45 6 6 CH45CH45 77 L5L5 22 L5L5 Others 0.33% Bramley More Dock CH45CH45 88 CH45CH45 44 CH45CH45 44 L5L5 5 5 Total 100% Nelson Dock WallaseyWallasey L3L3 00 WallaseyWallasey L5L5 33 Salisbury Dock L5L5 33 CH44CH44 11 CH44CH44 00 L5L5 88 CH46CH46 2 2 CH44CH44 00 L5L5 88 CH46CH46 2 2 Tenure % CH44CH44 8 8 Trafalgar Dock CH44CH44 22 Owned: Owned outright 26.97% CH46CH46 3 3 CH44CH44 22 CH44CH44 3 3 L3L3 66 CH44CH44 L3L3 77 L3L3 33 Owned: Owned with a mortgage or loan 31.17% CH44CH44 5 5 West Waterloo Dock CH44CH44 99 CH44CH44 66 Owner occupied - Shared ownership 0.49% CH46CH46 1 1 Princes Half Tide Dock CH46CH46 1 1 L3L3 22 CH44CH44 44 Rented from - Council (local authority) 3.49% BidstonBidston L3L3 99 BidstonBidston L3L3 99 L2L2 2 2 LiverpoolLiverpool LeasoweLeasowe Princes Dock L2L2 2 2 LiverpoolLiverpool CH44CH44
    [Show full text]
  • United Utilities Water Limited Liverpool Wastewater Treatment Works Sludge Treatment Installation Sandon Dock Regent Road Liverpool L3 0BE
    Notice of variation and consolidation with introductory note The Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2016 United Utilities Water Limited Liverpool Wastewater Treatment Works Sludge Treatment Installation Sandon Dock Regent Road Liverpool L3 0BE Variation application number EPR/HP3131LX/V008 Permit number EPR/HP3131LX Variation and consolidation application number EPR/HP3131LX/V008 1 Liverpool Wastewater Treatment Works Sludge Treatment Installation Permit number EPR/HP3131LX Introductory note This introductory note does not form a part of the notice Under the Environmental Permitting (England & Wales) Regulations 2016 (schedule 5, part 1, paragraph 19) a variation may comprise a consolidated permit reflecting the variations and a notice specifying the variations included in that consolidated permit. Schedule 1 of the notice specifies the conditions that have been varied and schedule 2 comprises a consolidated permit which reflects the variations being made. All the conditions of the permit have been varied and are subject to the right of appeal. The changes to this permit are as follows: Increase in annual throughput to 6,192,720 wet tonnes Replace two existing CHP gas engines extend the existing installation boundary to accommodate the new engines The installation is made up of an area located within Liverpool Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW), Sandon, Dock, Regent Road, Liverpool, NGR – SJ 33439 92809. The process operates under certified environmental and quality management systems and consists of the storage, screening and dewatering of sewage sludge before gently heating the sludge in anaerobic digesters. Heat within the digesters encourages the biological breakdown of the sludge and produces a biogas consisting largely of methane. The biogas is captured, and stored in gas holders prior to being utilised in a combination of combustion plant which converts the gas into heat for the digesters and into electricity for the installation and WwTW.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission Report, Liverpool
    World Heritage 36 COM Patrimoine mondial Distribution limited / limitée Paris, 1 June / 1 juin 2012 Original: English UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L'EDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE CONVENTION CONCERNANT LA PROTECTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL, CULTUREL ET NATUREL WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE / COMITE DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL Thirty-sixth session / Trente-sixième session Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation / Saint Pétersbourg, Fédération de Russie 24 June – 6 July 2012 / 24 juin – 6 juillet 2012 Item 7 of the Provisional Agenda: State of conservation of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List and/or on the List of World Heritage in Danger. Point 7 de l’Ordre du jour provisoire: Etat de conservation de biens inscrits sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial et/ou sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial en péril MISSION REPORT / RAPPORT DE MISSION Liverpool – Maritime Mercantile City (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) (C 1150) Liverpool – Port marchand (Royaume-Uni de Grande Bretagne et d'Irlande du Nord) (C 1150) 14-16 November 2011 This mission report should be read in conjunction with Document: Ce rapport de mission doit être lu conjointement avec le document suivant: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add 1 Acknowledgements The mission would like to thank Mr Paul Blaker, Head of World Heritage at the Department for Culture, Media and Sports, for welcoming and informing the mission in Liverpool on behalf of the national authorities of the United Kingdom, as well as Mr Frank Prendergast, Lord Mayor of Liverpool, Mr Joe Anderson, Leader of the Council, Mr Nick Kavannagh, Director of Regeneration, Mr John Hinchliffe, World Heritage Officer and the other Senior Executives of the Liverpool City Council for the excellent collaboration.
    [Show full text]