arXiv:2103.06983v2 [hep-th] 10 Jun 2021 hsc eatet nvriyo unsArsFENUAadIF and FCEyN-UBA Aires Buenos of University Department, Physics ncmlt gemn ihohrformalisms. other with agreement hori complete the in from ho angu environments the near magnetized and highly the in charge, to holes electric black analysis the mass, the the restricting entropy, Wald by the hole comp black to a method such a providing of clea by a obstruction requires this usually circumvent this we as charges insta conserved for this; compute like to scenario an address Fi to er obstruction its reasons: an of be extension two infinite following the to non-stati the due the Melvin to secondly, asymptotically flat; due locally is asymptotically This not is sit hole. physical black a the describes to however, i solution, hole This solutio black Ernst-Wild universe. stationary the charged, by a described representing well equations, is magnet the scenario of an backreaction such gravitational the where case the esuysainr lc oe ntepeec fa externa an of presence the in holes black stationary study We iddUiestra aelo ,12,Beo ie,Arg Aires, Buenos 1428, pabell´on 1, Universitaria, Ciudad h ymtiso antzdhorizons magnetized of symmetries The ah rne,Gso iie,LcaoMontecchio Luciano Giribet, Gaston Brenner, Sasha Abstract rs-idslto snteven not is solution Ernst-Wild c c,i em ob nobstruction an be to seems it nce, oein l hsmgtse to seem might this All goregion. mre naMli magnetic Melvin a in mmersed ainol ntergo close region the in only uation o esetv,fidn results finding perspective, zon oino smtta Here, asymptotia. of notion r cfil stknit account, into taken is field ic a oetmo stationary of momentum lar oEnti-awl field Einstein-Maxwell to n io ein ecompute We region. rizon t h osre charges conserved the ute togmgei ed In field. magnetic strong l sl,Mli spacetime Melvin rstly, entina. IBA-CONICET 1 Introduction
Compact objects in strong magnetic fields are of great importance in astrophysics. Scenarios such as supermasive black holes in active galactic nuclei, or even at the center of our galaxy [1] could be of that sort. One can also think of other scenarios, such as binary systems involving a stellar black hole and a magnetar [2, 3]. In the latter case, for example, the energy density of the magnetic field in close proximity to the star would be enormous, exceeding in many order of magnitudes the mass density of heavy elements, and so yielding a non-negligible gravitational backreaction. Here, we will study the case of black holes placed in a region of very strong magnetic fields, including the gravitational backreaction of the latter on the spacetime geometry. Such a highly magnetized region of the spacetime may well be approximated by the Melvin solution to Einstein equations [4], an axisymmetric geometry that describes a universe filled with a stable bundle of magnetic lines bounded by gravitational interaction [5, 6]. In a Melvin type spacetime one may consider to place a black hole and to use such scenario to model how the magnetic field affects the near horizon region. The solution describing a stationary black hole in a Melvin universe is known analytically; it has been given by Ernst and Wild in [8, 9]; see also [10, 11]. The solution, however, describes a physical situation as long as one focuses on the region close to the black hole. This is due to the non-standard asymptotics of the Melvin spacetime, which is not asymptotically flat; in addition, as shown in [12], Ernst-Wild solution is not strictly asymptotically Melvin due to the infinite extension of its ergoregion. All this might seem to represent an obstruction to address an scenario like this, as in gravitational theories one frequently deals with computations that demand to have a clear notion of asymptotia, an example being the standard methods to compute conserved charges. This is precisely why the possibility of accomplishing a robust method to compute conserved charges from the near horizon perspective becomes particularly interesting [13]. Here, by extending the near horizon symmetry methods developed in [13, 14, 15] to the case of magnetized horizons1, we will be able to explicitly derive the relevant charges that describe the physics of charged, stationary black holes in strong magnetic fields. The Wald entropy, the angular momentum, and electric charges of the Ernst-Wild black hole solution in Melvin universe will be obtained in a direct way. To do
1The near horizon limit of extremal and near-extremal black holes in Melvin universe has been considered in the literature; see for instance [19, 20, 21] and references therein and thereof. Here, in contrast, we will not restrict the analysis to the set of extremal configurations.
1 so, we will first show that such a solution can be accommodated in the set of asymptotic near horizon conditions introduced in [15] for the Einstein-Maxwell theory, so yielding an infinite- dimensional symmetry algebra in the vicinity of magnetized horizons. Then, the black hole charges will be shown to coincide with the Noether charges associated to such symmetry2. The paper is organized as follows: In section 2, we will review the Ernst solution to Einstein equations [8], which describe a black hole in a backreacting external magnetic field. We will focus on the physical interpretation of the spacetime geometry and comment the most important aspects of the geometry. In section 3, as a first example, we will show how such a solution can be studied with the near horizon techniques developed in [13]. This will lead us to generalize the results previously obtained in [14] and [15] to the case where the conserved charges depend on the backreacting external magnetic field. In section 4, we will extend the analysis to the case of electrically charged, stationary black hole solutions immersed in a strong external magnetic field. This shows that also this case admits a near horizon description as the one in [13], yielding supertranslations and superrotation charges. In section 5, we will show that, while the zero-modes of the supertranslation charges are shown to reproduce the Wald entropy of the black holes, the superrotation charges at the horizon will correctly reproduce the angular momentum contribution of the electromagnetic field, manifestly exhibiting a Gauss phenomenon. Our computation of the Wald entropy, the mass, the angular momentum, and electric charge of the magnetized black hole is found to be in complete agreement with the results obtained by other methods and thus consistent with black hole thermodynamics. In section 6, we briefly discuss the case of magnetically charged black holes in an external field.
2 Black holes in a magnetized environment
Let us start by reviewing the Melvin solution to Einstein-Maxwell equations, which describes an axisymmetric universe filled with a magnetic field [4]. The metric of such spacetime in polar coordinates is given by
ds2 = Λ2(r, θ)( −dt2 + dr2 + r2dθ2 )+Λ−2(r, θ) r2 sin2 θdφ2 (1)
2Conserved charges and thermodynamics of black holes in Melvin universes have been studied with other methods; for instance, in references [16, 12, 17, 18]. Our formalism, while qualitatively different, leads to results that are consistent with those of previous analysis
2 with 1 Λ(r, θ)=1+ B2r2 sin2 θ, (2) 4 0 where t ∈ R, r ∈ R≥0, φ ∈ [0, 2π], θ = [0, π]. It may be useful to consider cylindrical coordinates ρ = r sin θ, z = r cos θ. The magnetic field is given by
−2 Hz = Λ (r, θ) B0 , (3)
with Hρ = Hφ = Hθ = 0. B0 is a constant that controls the magnitude of the external magnetic field. This solution can be thought of as a bundle of magnetic lines in the z-direction that are bounded by gravitational interaction, forming in such a way a stable configuration [5, 6]. The resulting spacetime exhibits isometry group ISO(1, 1) × SO(2), which correspond to the Poincar´egroup in the (1+1)-dimensional constant-φ, constant-ρ slices, together with rotations
in φ. While the solution with B0 = 0 corresponds to Minkowski spacetime, when B0 =6 0 the geometry is not asymptotically flat; in fact, the squashing of the constant-t, constant-r surfaces produced by the function Λ(r, θ) increases at large distance, while it becomes negligible when −1 r ≪ B0 . By using a solution generating technique developed by Harrison in [7], Ernst found in [8] a generalization to the Melvin solution that come to describe a static black hole immersed in an external magnetic field, cf. [10, 11]. The metric of the solution takes the form
dr2 ds2 = Λ2(r, θ) − f(r)dt2 + + r2dθ2 +Λ−2(r, θ) r2 sin2 θdφ2 (4) f(r) with 1 2M Λ(r, θ)= 1+ B2r2 sin2 θ , and f(r)= 1 − , (5) 4 0 r while the non-vanishing components of the magnetic field are given by
−2 Hr = Λ (r, θ) B0 cos θ (6) 1/2 −2 2M Hθ = − Λ (r, θ) B0 1 − sin θ. (7) r It is clear from these expressions that Ernst solution becomes Melvin universe (1)-(3) when M = 0, while it reduces to the metric of a Schwarzschild black hole of mass M when the external magnetic field vanishes, B0 = 0 (here we use natural units G = c = 1). The geometry with
B0 =6 0 =6 M exhibits isometry group R × SO(2) generated by the Killing vectors ∂t, ∂φ. The
3 interpretation of the metric is that of a Schwarzschild black hole in an asymptotically Melvin universe. The location of the horizon of the black hole is r+ = 2M, where the spacetime is regular. The geometry is singular only at r = 0, provided M =6 0. Ernst solution (4)-(6) admits a stationary, charged generalization [8, 9], which is the one on which we will focus in this work. It is worth mentioning already here that the electrically charged solution, even when no intrinsic rotation is present, happens to be non-static, but stationary. This is due to the non-vanishing Poynting density of a charged particle in an external magnetic field, which produces an effective dragging in spacetime. This is related to what happens when approaching a magnetic monopole to a Reissner-Nordstr¨om black hole, cf. [22]. We will discuss the electrically charged black hole case in section 4. Before that, in the next section, we will analyze the symmetries emerging in the near horizon limit of magnetized black holes (4)-(6).
3 Near horizon asymptotics
To analyze the near horizon symmetries and the associated conserved charges in Einstein- Maxwell theory, we resort to the results of reference [15], which come to generalize the near horizon analysis of [13, 14] to the case of electrically, magnetically charged solutions3. In [15], the following asymptotic conditions for the metric near the horizon were considered
2 gvv = − 2κ ρ + O(ρ ), B 2 gvA = θA(z ) ρ + O(ρ ), (8) C C 2 gAB = ΩAB(z )+ λAB(z ) ρ + O(ρ ), together with the gauge fixing condition
gρρ =0, gvρ =1, gAρ =0. (9)
The horizon location is ρ = 0, so that ρ ∈ R≥0 is the coordinate that measures the distance from the horizon. Power expansion in ρ thus controls the near horizon asymptotic conditions, with O(ρn) standing for orders that damp off as fast as ∼ ρn, or faster, as one approaches the 2 µ ν 0 A A horizon. The spacetime metric is ds = gµνdx dx (µ, ν = 0, 1, 2, 3), with x = v, x = z
3Infinite-dimensional near horizon symmetries have also been studied in reference [23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31].
4 (A,B,C = 1, 2), and x3 = ρ. Coordinate v ∈ R represents the null direction at the horizon + A H = Σ2 × R, while z (A =1, 2) represent the angular variables on the constant-v surface Σ2. A In (8)-(9), functions κ, θA, ΩAB, λAB may in principle depend on v and on z . However, as κ represents the surface gravity, it turns out to be consant for isolated horizons. Integrability of the Noether charges, on the other hand, demands θA and ΩAB not to depend on v; see [14] for details. µ The near horizon expansion of the electromagnetic field A = Aµdx , on the other hand, is given by
(0) (1) A 2 Av = Av + Av (v, z ) ρ + O(ρ ), (10) (0) A (1) A 2 AB = AB (z )+ AB (v, z ) ρ + O(ρ ), together with the gauge fixing condition Aρ = 0. Now, let us consider the group of diffeomorphisms and gauge transformations that preserve the above near horizon form for the fields gµν and Aµ. These are generated by the Killing vectors µ ξ = ξ ∂µ and gauge functions ǫ such that, after performing the changes gµν → gµν + δgµν = gµν + Lξgµν , Aµ → Aµ + δAµ = Aµ + LξAµ + ∂µǫ, with Lξ being the Lie derivative with respect to ξ, leave the expansion in powers of ρ described above unchanged, regardless whether or not (i) (i) µ the specific functions θA, ΩAB, Av , AB have changed. The explicit form of ξ and ǫ that satisfy this can be found in [15], and it comprehends the expansion
ξv = T (zA)+ O(ρ), ξρ = O(ρ), ξA = Y A(zB)+ O(ρ), (11) and
A A (0) ǫ = U(z ) − T (z )Av + O(ρ), (12) where T (zA), Y A(zB ) and U(zA) are four arbitrary functions of the angular coordinates zA (say z1 = z1(θ,φ) and z2 = z2(θ,φ)). These functions can be expanded in Fourier modes as follows
m n T (z, z¯)= T(m,n) z z¯ , Xm,n z n z¯ n Y (z)= Yn z ,Y (¯z)= Y¯n z¯ , (13) Xn Xn m n U(z, z¯)= U(m,n) z z¯ , Xm,n
5 where z andz ¯ are now complex variables, related to the angular coordinates θ and ϕ in a way
that depends on the solution under consideration. In (13), m, n ∈ Z, and T(m,n), Yn, Y¯n and
U(m,n) can be regarded as Fourier modes. As the diffeomorphisms and gauge transformations generated by ξµ and ǫ involve arbitrary functions of the angles, they can be shown to expand an infinite-dimensional algebra, which consists of two copies of Witt algebra in semi-direct sum
with two sets of Abelian currents. More precisely, Yn and Y¯n generate Witt algebra and so they
are called superrotations; while the two Abelian currents are generated by T(m,n) and U(m,n), and they are called supertranslations; see [13, 14, 15, 31]. The infinite-dimensional symmetries generated by ξµ and ǫ lead to Noether charges which take the form
A 1 2 (0) (1) A (1) B (0) (1) Q[T,Y , U]= d z det gAB − Tgvv − Y gvA − 4(U + Y AB )Av , (14) 16π Z q h i (i) th (0) (1) where gµν stand for the i term in the ρ expansion; namely, gAB = ΩAB, gAv = θA(z, z¯), (1) gvv = −2κ. This expression for the charges follows from the Barnich-Brandt formalism [32]. Now, having written down the explicit form for the conserved charges associated to the infinite-dimensional gauge symmetries described above, we are in condition to evaluate them for the case in which we are interested: the black hole in a magnetic external field. However, first we have to actually show that Ernst solution (4)-(6) can be accommodated in the asymptotic form (8)-(10) near the horizon. To do so, let us consider the following change of coordinates
′ r dr ′ 2 ′ v = t + ′ , ρ = Λ(r , θ) dr , (15) Z f(r ) Z2M and then expand in powers of ρ. We get
2 gvv = − ∂rf(r)|r=2M ρ + O(ρ ) 2 gvθ = − 2∂θ log |Λ(r, θ)||r=2M ρ + O(ρ )