Wisconsin Great Lakes Chronicle 2020 CONTENTS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wisconsin Great Lakes Chronicle 2020 CONTENTS Wisconsin Great Lakes Chronicle 2020 CONTENTS Foreword . 1 Governor Tony Evers Saxon Harbor Restoration . 2 Eric Peterson Great Lakes High Water Levels . 4 Deanna Apps Southeastern Wisconsin Coastal Resilience Project . 6 Adam Bechle Sheboygan River Area of Concern . 8 Stacy Hron and Kendra Axness Renard Island Master Plan . .10 Mark Walter Bayfield County Hydrogeologic Atlas . 12 Mark Abeles-Allison Office of Outdoor Recreation . 14 Mary Monroe Brown 2020 Wisconsin Coastal Management Program Grants . 16 Acknowledgements . 20 On the Cover Madeline Island Ferry Terminal in Bayfield, Travel Wisconsin FOREWORD Governor Tony Evers Dear Readers, Wisconsin Great Lakes the Governor’s Task Force on Climate Change, has to offer and provides a wonderful spot for Chronicle reflects the chaired by Lieutenant Governor Mandela Wisconsinites and visitors to explore each year. challenges and celebrates Barnes. This group is tasked with developing This year we are celebrating the 50th anniversary the successes of our strategies to mitigate and reverse the impacts of of the Apostle Islands being designated a National coastal communities climate change on our communities by assessing Lakeshore. With support from Senator Gaylord and residents. Our research, reviewing the actions of local and Nelson, the Apostle Islands were designated as a 2020 edition gives us tribal communities working to address climate national lakeshore on September 26, 1970. Today, an opportunity to share change, working with educational institutions, our National Park Service continues to connect some of both. and listening to Wisconsinites share their stories visitors to the natural and cultural resources of what’s happening in their own backyards. In within the park. Their efforts are supported by Over the last several years many Wisconsin addition to the Task Force, I created the Office of individuals and organizations like the Friends of communities have experienced firsthand the Sustainability and Clean Energy to lead our state in the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore, which challenges climate change has brought us. With addressing climate change by partnering with other began in 2002 and continues to support and more extreme weather events and more regular state agencies and developing a clean energy plan. enhance the park. episodes of high precipitation, families and For too long leaders have been ignoring science, communities have had to roll up their sleeves and Among the priorities I have established for this and frankly we can’t afford to do it any longer. work together to rebuild, especially in Wisconsin’s state as Governor and as Chair of the Conference coastal communities. Homeowners, businesses Even as we face challenges along our Great Lakes of Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Governors and local communities are seeking ways to and throughout the state of Wisconsin, we have and Premiers are those to ensure the protection become more resilient to coastal hazards, as they reasons to celebrate. In addition to our efforts of our vast and valuable natural resources, like confront higher lake levels and ongoing threats of around climate change, we also established the Apostle Islands. It is time for us to deliver erosion and flooding. Collaborative efforts, like the first ever Office of Outdoor Recreation in on the promise to our kids that we’re leaving the Southeastern Wisconsin Coastal Resilience Wisconsin to enhance and support Wisconsin’s them with a better life and world than the one Project, provide opportunities to expand on outdoor recreation economy which supports we inherited and to ensure the protection of local efforts to identify risks, plan and improve thousands of jobs and communities throughout Wisconsin’s beautiful lakeshores for generations responses to flooding, erosion and storm events. the state. One such community that is a to come. There is much work left to do and I destination for outdoor recreation throughout the look forward to continuing the important work While communities strive to become more year is the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore. of protecting our Great Lakes now and into the resilient for the path ahead, we must address the With sea caves, lighthouses, beaches and trails, future, together. source of these challenges. That’s why I created the park exemplifies all the beauty Wisconsin Wisconsin Great Lakes Chronicle 2020 | page 1 The cooperation of SAXON HARBOR RESTORATION multiple partners and Eric Peterson thousands of hours of In a few short hours on the evening of July 11, of the harbor. The online survey produced an 2016, life changed for many people in Northern overwhelmingly positive response to rebuild Saxon effort turned Saxon Wisconsin. Torrential rains brought a 1,000-plus Harbor and brought to light areas that could year flood that wiped out roadways and other be improved at the facility. The public wanted Harbor’s devastation critical infrastructure across the northwestern the marina rebuilt, the campground located as close to the marina as possible, beach access and into a gem. counties. In Iron County, Saxon Harbor at the shore of Lake Superior and the mouth of Oronto day-use amenities. and Parker Creeks sat directly in the path of these 2017 was spent establishing reconstruction raging floodwaters. A bustling campground and plans and areas of financial responsibility. By marina a week prior became an unrecognizable late 2017, WisDOT and the Federal Highway disaster area when the floodwaters subsided. Administration planned to relocate the bridge A Federal Disaster Declaration allowed the US further upstream over Oronto Creek and construct Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) the new roadway where the campground once sat. to assist local communities with rebuilding The 40’ span bridge would be replaced with a new efforts. Many projects were quickly developed 104’ three-span bridge allowing a greater area for and critical reconstruction efforts were completed, Oronto Creek to pass beneath. but Saxon Harbor was not among them. Saxon The US Army Corps of Engineers received an Harbor recovery efforts would take time due to appropriation to dredge the federal channel within the loss of a county highway, bridge, campground the harbor of refuge extending into the north basin and marina, and a federally designated harbor of of the marina from Lake Superior. Iron County refuge filled with sediment. FEMA, Wisconsin won multiple grants to improve facilities that were Emergency Management, the US Army Corps of deemed outside of the scope of the disaster and Engineers (USACE), the County’s insurance carrier, therefore ineligible for FEMA funds. The County’s the Wisconsin Department of Transportation engineering team, led by Foth Infrastructure & (WisDOT), the Federal Highway Administration Environment, LLC, worked diligently to complete and Iron County would all share in the financial design and bid documents for these improvements responsibility to rebuild Saxon Harbor. along with the complete reconstruction and Before work began on reconstruction efforts, dredging of the marina. Additionally, Wisconsin Iron County secured grant funding from the Administrative Code, floodplain regulations and Wisconsin Coastal Management Program local zoning required that the campground be (WCMP) to survey the public on the future rebuilt at a different location. Wisconsin Great Lakes Chronicle 2020 | page 2 SAXON HARBOR RESTORATION Eric Peterson With designs completed, permits in place and 51,000 cubic yards of sediment was removed The contract for marina improvements and the schedules of multiple contractors coordinated, from Saxon Harbor. In June, the contractor for reconstruction was awarded In November 2018. reconstruction finally began in late February the WisDOT project forged ahead and the new Construction began almost immediately as the 2018. Iron County’s contractor worked on roadway and bridge opened in August. contractor worked throughout the winter in Oronto and Parker Creeks to re-establish the freezing conditions to meet deadlines that would Work also began to build the framework around streambed and armor the banks with tons of rip allow Iron County to open the marina for use as the marina. Preformed, interlocking concrete rap to return flow to Lake Superior. Saxon Harbor quickly as possible. With favorable conditions in panels were used to form the marina basins and became a very busy construction zone as winter late spring and throughout the summer, and with provide retaining walls to backfill areas that had released its grip on the Northwoods. few delays, construction was completed in August. been washed away. WCMP came through again Iron County held a soft opening over Labor Day In May, the USACE dredge contractor began with grant funding to study alternatives to protect weekend 2019. Within two days of reopening, work within the federal channel. This contractor the outfall of Oronto and Parker Creeks into Lake more than forty boats were docked in the marina was also awarded the contract to dredge the Superior. The Foth engineering team completed and the public was able to get a look at what the remainder of the marina that is the responsibility this study and funding options will be evaluated new facility would offer. of Iron County. By summer’s end, approximately for future construction. It is hard to believe that what took only a few hours to destroy could turn into more than four years to rebuild. The cooperation of multiple agencies, grant programs, state and federal legislators and thousands of hours
Recommended publications
  • WLSSB Map and Guide
    WISCONSIN LAKE SUPERIOR SCENIC BYWAY (WLSSB) DEVILS ISLAND NORTH TWIN ISLAND MAP KEY ROCKY ISLAND SOUTH TWIN ISLAND CAT ISLAND WISCONSIN LAKE SUPERIOR SCENIC BYWAY APOSTLE ISLANDS BEAR ISLAND NATIONAL LAKESHORE KIOSK LOCATION IRONWOOD ISLAND SCENIC BYWAY NEAR HERBSTER SAILING ON LAKE SUPERIOR LOST CREEK FALLS KIOSKS CONTAIN DETAILED INFORMATION ABOUT EACH LOCATION SAND ISLAND VISITOR INFORMATION OUTER ISLAND YORK ISLAND SEE REVERSE FOR COMPLETE LIST µ OTTER ISLAND FEDERAL HIGHWAY MANITOU ISLAND RASPBERRY ISLAND STATE HIGHWAY COUNTY HIGHWAY 7 EAGLE ISLAND NATIONAL PARKS ICE CAVES AT MEYERS BEACH BAYFIELD PENINSULA AND THE APOSTLE ISLANDS FROM MT. ASHWABAY & NATIONAL FOREST LANDS well as a Heritage Museum and a Maritime Museum. Pick up Just across the street is the downtown area with a kayak STATE PARKS K OAK ISLAND STOCKTON ISLAND some fresh or smoked fish from a commercial fishery for a outfitter, restaurants, more lodging and a historic general & STATE FOREST LANDS 6 GULL ISLAND taste of Lake Superior or enjoy local flavors at one of the area store that has a little bit of everything - just like in the “old (!13! RED CLIFF restaurants. If you’re brave, try the whitefish livers – they’re a days,” but with a modern flair. Just off the Byway you can MEYERS BEACH COUNTY PARKS INDIAN RESERVATION local specialty! visit two popular waterfalls: Siskiwit Falls and Lost Creek & COUNTY FOREST LANDS Falls. West of Cornucopia you will find the Lost Creek Bog HERMIT ISLAND Walk the Brownstone Trail along an old railroad grade or CORNUCOPIA State Natural Area. Lost Creek Bog forms an estuary at the take the Gil Larson Nature Trail (part of the Big Ravine Trail MICHIGAN ISLAND mouths of three small creeks (Lost Creek 1, 2, and 3) where System) which starts by a historic apple shed, continues RESERVATION LANDS they empty into Lake Superior at Siskiwit Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lake Michigan Natural Division Characteristics
    The Lake Michigan Natural Division Characteristics Lake Michigan is a dynamic deepwater oligotrophic ecosystem that supports a diverse mix of native and non-native species. Although the watershed, wetlands, and tributaries that drain into the open waters are comprised of a wide variety of habitat types critical to supporting its diverse biological community this section will focus on the open water component of this system. Watershed, wetland, and tributaries issues will be addressed in the Northeastern Morainal Natural Division section. Species diversity, as well as their abundance and distribution, are influenced by a combination of biotic and abiotic factors that define a variety of open water habitat types. Key abiotic factors are depth, temperature, currents, and substrate. Biotic activities, such as increased water clarity associated with zebra mussel filtering activity, also are critical components. Nearshore areas support a diverse fish fauna in which yellow perch, rockbass and smallmouth bass are the more commonly found species in Illinois waters. Largemouth bass, rockbass, and yellow perch are commonly found within boat harbors. A predator-prey complex consisting of five salmonid species and primarily alewives populate the pelagic zone while bloater chubs, sculpin species, and burbot populate the deepwater benthic zone. Challenges Invasive species, substrate loss, and changes in current flow patterns are factors that affect open water habitat. Construction of revetments, groins, and landfills has significantly altered the Illinois shoreline resulting in an immeasurable loss of spawning and nursery habitat. Sea lampreys and alewives were significant factors leading to the demise of lake trout and other native species by the early 1960s.
    [Show full text]
  • GLRI Fact Sheet
    WISCONSIN PROJECTS FOR 2010-2011 Great Lakes Restoration Initiative Federal funds support critical restoration and protection work on Wisconsinʼs Great Lakes Wisconsinʼs agencies and Priorities for the Great Lakes. GLRI funds will help Wisconsin address Great Lakes Drainage Basins in Wisconsin organizations received almost $30 these priorities on Lake Michigan and Lake Superior million in grants for the first year of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative – a Lake Superior. federal basin-wide effort to restore and Economic Benefits of Restoration protect the Great Lakes. Restoring the Great Lakes will bring great benefits to our state. Work done A Vital Economic Asset under the GLRI will create jobs, The Great Lakes have had profound stimulate economic development, and Lake effects on our environment, culture, Michigan improve freshwater resources and ! and quality of life. They have fueled shoreline communities. A study our economic growth in the past and – conducted by the Brookings Institution if properly restored and protected – will Map Scale: found that fully implementing the 1 inch = 39.46 miles help us revitalize our economy in the regional collaboration strategy will future. generate $80-$100 billion in short and Lake Superior and Lake Michigan are affected by the actions of people throughout their watersheds. Lake Lake Michigan and Lake Superior long term benefits, including: Superior’s watershed drains 1,975,902 acres and provide: • $6.5-$11.8 billion in benefits supports 123,000 people. Lake Michigan’s watershed from tourism, fishing and drains 9,105,558 acres and supports 2,352,417 • Sport fishing opportunities for people. more than 250,000 anglers, recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • Apostle Islands National Lakehore Geologic Resources Inventory
    Geologic Resources Inventory Scoping Summary Apostle Islands National Lakeshore Geologic Resources Division Prepared by Trista L. Thornberry-Ehrlich National Park Service August 7, 2010 US Department of the Interior The Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) provides each of 270 identified natural area National Park System units with a geologic scoping meeting and summary (this document), a digital geologic map, and a geologic resources inventory report. The purpose of scoping is to identify geologic mapping coverage and needs, distinctive geologic processes and features, resource management issues, and monitoring and research needs. Geologic scoping meetings generate an evaluation of the adequacy of existing geologic maps for resource management, provide an opportunity to discuss park-specific geologic management issues, and if possible include a site visit with local experts. The National Park Service held a GRI scoping meeting for Apostle Islands National Lakeshore on July 20-21, 2010 both out in the field on a boating site visit from Bayfield, Wisconsin, and at the headquarters building for the Great Lakes Network in Ashland, Wisconsin. Jim Chappell (Colorado State University [CSU]) facilitated the discussion of map coverage and Bruce Heise (NPS-GRD) led the discussion regarding geologic processes and features at the park. Dick Ojakangas from the University of Minnesota at Duluth and Laurel Woodruff from the U.S. Geological Survey presented brief geologic overviews of the park and surrounding area. Participants at the meeting included NPS staff from the park and Geologic Resources Division; geologists from the University of Minnesota at Duluth, Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, and U.S. Geological Survey; and cooperators from Colorado State University (see table 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes/Big Rivers Fisheries Operational Plan Accomplishment
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Fisheries Operational Plan Accomplishment Report for Fiscal Year 2004 March 2003 Region 3 - Great Lakes/Big Rivers Partnerships and Accountability Aquatic Habitat Conservation and Management Workforce Management Aquatic Species Conservation and Aquatic Invasive Species Management Cooperation with Native Public Use Leadership in Science Americans and Technology To view monthly issues of “Fish Lines”, see our Regional website at: (http://www.fws.gov/midwest/Fisheries/) 2 Fisheries Accomplishment Report - FY2004 Great Lakes - Big Rivers Region Message from the Assistant Regional Director for Fisheries The Fisheries Program in Region 3 (Great Lakes – Big Rivers) is committed to the conservation of our diverse aquatic resources and the maintenance of healthy, sustainable populations of fish that can be enjoyed by millions of recreational anglers. To that end, we are working with the States, Tribes, other Federal agencies and our many partners in the private sector to identify, prioritize and focus our efforts in a manner that is most complementary to their efforts, consistent with the mission of our agency, and within the funding resources available. At the very heart of our efforts is the desire to be transparent and accountable and, to that end, we present this Region 3 Annual Fisheries Accomplishment Report for Fiscal Year 2004. This report captures our commitments from the Region 3 Fisheries Program Operational Plan, Fiscal Years 2004 & 2005. This document cannot possibly capture the myriad of activities that are carried out by any one station in any one year, by all of the dedicated employees in the Fisheries Program, but, hopefully, it provides a clear indication of where our energy is focused.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Deadliest American Disasters and Large Loss
    DEADLIEST AMERICAN DISASTERS AND LARGE LOSS-OF-LIFE EVENTS1 Homepage: http://www.usdeadlyevents.com/ A Catalog of, and Notes on, Natural and Man-Made Events Causing Ten or More Fatalities in America/The United States and its Territories Since 1492 CHRONOLOGY B. Wayne Blanchard, PhD Blue Ridge Summit, PA Feb 12, 2021 Copyright August 2017 Go to Homepage to access: Event Typology (e.g. aviation, epidemics, explosions, fires heat, mining, hurricanes, violence). Breakout of Events by States, District of Columbia and Territories. Rank-ordering within Types by State. Spreadsheet. Lines highlighted in Yellow indicate there is a narrative document with more information and sources in the Spreadsheet accessed by clicking on the URL at the end of the entry. There are more than 20,000 pages of additional material to be found there. Could be one page or over 100 pages per entry, depending on the event, but usually on order of 3-5 pages. 1. 1492-1800 -- North American Native American population decline, esp. disease--~2,800,000 2. 1527 -- Nov, Hurricane, Matagorda Bay, TX -- 200 3. 1538-1539, Unknown epidemic, “Cofitachequi”2 Natives, central SC -- Hundreds 4. 1539 --~Sep 16, Napituca Massacre, Hernando de Soto executes Timucuans, No. Cen. FL-30-200 5. 1540 -- Oct 18, Spanish (de Soto) battle/massacre, with Atahachi, Mabila, AL --2,500-6,000 1 We use the term “Large-Loss-of-Life Event to denote ten or more deaths. There are a number in instances where, for a variety of reasons, we enter an event with fewer than 10 fatalities. We do not, though, include these in tally.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Superior Food Web MENT of C
    ATMOSPH ND ER A I C C I A N D A M E I C N O I S L T A R N A T O I I O T N A N U E .S C .D R E E PA M RT OM Lake Superior Food Web MENT OF C Sea Lamprey Walleye Burbot Lake Trout Chinook Salmon Brook Trout Rainbow Trout Lake Whitefish Bloater Yellow Perch Lake herring Rainbow Smelt Deepwater Sculpin Kiyi Ruffe Lake Sturgeon Mayfly nymphs Opossum Shrimp Raptorial waterflea Mollusks Amphipods Invasive waterflea Chironomids Zebra/Quagga mussels Native waterflea Calanoids Cyclopoids Diatoms Green algae Blue-green algae Flagellates Rotifers Foodweb based on “Impact of exotic invertebrate invaders on food web structure and function in the Great Lakes: NOAA, Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, 4840 S. State Road, Ann Arbor, MI A network analysis approach” by Mason, Krause, and Ulanowicz, 2002 - Modifications for Lake Superior, 2009. 734-741-2235 - www.glerl.noaa.gov Lake Superior Food Web Sea Lamprey Macroinvertebrates Sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). An aggressive, non-native parasite that Chironomids/Oligochaetes. Larval insects and worms that live on the lake fastens onto its prey and rasps out a hole with its rough tongue. bottom. Feed on detritus. Species present are a good indicator of water quality. Piscivores (Fish Eaters) Amphipods (Diporeia). The most common species of amphipod found in fish diets that began declining in the late 1990’s. Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Pacific salmon species stocked as a trophy fish and to control alewife. Opossum shrimp (Mysis relicta). An omnivore that feeds on algae and small cladocerans.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are the Current Pressures Impacting Lake Erie
    STATE OF THE GREAT LAKES 2005 WHAWHATT AREARE THETHE CURRENTCURRENT PRESSURESPRESSURES IMPIMPACTINGACTING LAKELAKE ERIE?ERIE? Land use practices, nutrient inputs, and the introduction of non-native invasive species are the greatest threats Land use, nutrient inputs, natural resource use, chemical and biological contaminants, and non- to the Lake Erie ecosystem. Natural resource use and chemical and biological contaminants also continue to native invasive species are the greatest threats to the Lake Erie ecosystem. impact the Lake Erie basin. Pressures and Actions Needed Land use Lake Superior Land use changes, including urban development and sprawl, intensification of agriculture, and Lake Huron construction of shore structures continue to negatively impact water quality and quantity, and Lake Ontario fish and wildlife habitats in Lake Erie and its Lake Michigan tributaries. Unless significant changes are made, this trend is expected to continue as demand for land Lake Erie conversion and use in the Lake Erie basin intensifies. In some areas of the Lake Erie watershed, over 90 actually render the ecosystem more susceptible to percent of the land has been converted to future invasions. Increased water transparency due to agriculture, urban and industrial use. A major focus the combined effects of nutrient control and zebra on the rehabilitation of remaining natural habitats mussel filtering has reduced habitat for walleye, and the physical processes that support them is which avoid high light conditions. Increased water required in order to restore Lake Erie's aquatic transparency combined with lower Lake Erie water ecosystems. Through best management practices, we levels has resulted in an increase of submerged must undertake rural, urban and industrial land use aquatic plants.
    [Show full text]
  • The Laurentian Great Lakes
    The Laurentian Great Lakes James T. Waples Margaret Squires Great Lakes WATER Institute Biology Department University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada Brian Eadie James Cotner NOAA/GLERL Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior University of Minnesota J. Val Klump Great Lakes WATER Institute Galen McKinley University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Atmospheric and Oceanic Services University of Wisconsin-Madison Introduction forests. In the southern areas of the basin, the climate is much warmer. The soils are deeper with layers or North America’s inland ocean, the Great Lakes mixtures of clays, carbonates, silts, sands, gravels, and (Figure 7.1), contains about 23,000 km3 (5,500 cu. boulders deposited as glacial drift or as glacial lake and mi.) of water (enough to flood the continental United river sediments. The lands are usually fertile and have States to a depth of nearly 3 m), and covers a total been extensively drained for agriculture. The original area of 244,000 km2 (94,000 sq. mi.) with 16,000 deciduous forests have given way to agriculture and km of coastline. The Great Lakes comprise the largest sprawling urban development. This variability has system of fresh, surface water lakes on earth, containing strong impacts on the characteristics of each lake. The roughly 18% of the world supply of surface freshwater. lakes are known to have significant effects on air masses Reservoirs of dissolved carbon and rates of carbon as they move in prevailing directions, as exemplified cycling in the lakes are comparable to observations in by the ‘lake effect snow’ that falls heavily in winter on the marine coastal oceans (e.g., Biddanda et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Apostle Islands National Lakeshore Geologic Resources Inventory Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Apostle Islands National Lakeshore Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2015/972 ON THIS PAGE An opening in an ice-fringed sea cave reveals ice flows on Lake Superior. Photograph by Neil Howk (National Park Service) taken in winter 2008. ON THE COVER Wind and associated wave activity created a window in Devils Island Sandstone at Devils Island. Photograph by Trista L. Thornberry-Ehrlich (Colorado State University) taken in summer 2010. Apostle Islands National Lakeshore Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2015/972 Trista L. Thornberry-Ehrlich Colorado State University Research Associate National Park Service Geologic Resources Division Geologic Resources Inventory PO Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225 May 2015 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Michigan Lakewide Management Plan (Lamp) 2006
    TC-1 Lake Michigan LaMP 2006 Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................i-1 What is the Status of the Lake?.........................................................................................................i-1 Background on the LaMP……………………………………………… ...............................................i-2 Linking LaMP Goals to RAPs…………………………………………....................................................i-2 Remedial Action Plans…………………………………………...............................................i-2 LaMP 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006: How and by whom are they used? .....................................i-3 What Was Accomplished and What Challenges Remain? .........................................................i-3 Areas of LaMP Work that Remain a Challenge………………………............................................i-3 A Focus on the Future: Sustainability and Stewardship……………… ..........................................i-4 A Focus on Ecosystems and Watersheds………………………………............................................i-4 A Focus on Partnerships and Innovation and Shared Information……………………………….i-5 LaMP 2006 Data and Information……………………………………….............................................i-5 Great Lakes Regional Collaboration ...............................................................................................i-6 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement...........................................................................................i-6
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes
    35133_Geo_Michigan_Cover.qxd 11/13/07 10:26 AM Page 1 “The Geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes” is written to augment any introductory earth science, environmental geology, geologic, or geographic course offering, and is designed to introduce students in Michigan and the Great Lakes to important regional geologic concepts and events. Although Michigan’s geologic past spans the Precambrian through the Holocene, much of the rock record, Pennsylvanian through Pliocene, is miss- ing. Glacial events during the Pleistocene removed these rocks. However, these same glacial events left behind a rich legacy of surficial deposits, various landscape features, lakes, and rivers. Michigan is one of the most scenic states in the nation, providing numerous recre- ational opportunities to inhabitants and visitors alike. Geology of the region has also played an important, and often controlling, role in the pattern of settlement and ongoing economic development of the state. Vital resources such as iron ore, copper, gypsum, salt, oil, and gas have greatly contributed to Michigan’s growth and industrial might. Ample supplies of high-quality water support a vibrant population and strong industrial base throughout the Great Lakes region. These water supplies are now becoming increasingly important in light of modern economic growth and population demands. This text introduces the student to the geology of Michigan and the Great Lakes region. It begins with the Precambrian basement terrains as they relate to plate tectonic events. It describes Paleozoic clastic and carbonate rocks, restricted basin salts, and Niagaran pinnacle reefs. Quaternary glacial events and the development of today’s modern landscapes are also discussed.
    [Show full text]