DOCSLIB.ORG

Lake Michigan Lakewide Management Plan (Lamp) 2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lake Michigan Lakewide Management Plan (Lamp) 2006 TC-1 Lake Michigan LaMP 2006 Table of Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................i-1 What is the Status of the Lake?.........................................................................................................i-1 Background on the LaMP……………………………………………… ...............................................i-2 Linking LaMP Goals to RAPs…………………………………………....................................................i-2 Remedial Action Plans…………………………………………...............................................i-2 LaMP 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006: How and by whom are they used? .....................................i-3 What Was Accomplished and What Challenges Remain? .........................................................i-3 Areas of LaMP Work that Remain a Challenge………………………............................................i-3 A Focus on the Future: Sustainability and Stewardship……………… ..........................................i-4 A Focus on Ecosystems and Watersheds………………………………............................................i-4 A Focus on Partnerships and Innovation and Shared Information……………………………….i-5 LaMP 2006 Data and Information……………………………………….............................................i-5 Great Lakes Regional Collaboration ...............................................................................................i-6 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement...........................................................................................i-6 Organization of the LaMP and this Status Report for 2006…………….........................................i-6 What Does Page One of Each Chapter Explain?..........................................................................i-7 What Are the Text Boxes and What Do They Provide? .................................................................i-7 What is the ‘Lake Michigan Toolbox?..............................................................................................i-7 Where Can I Find LaMP 2000 and the 2002 and 2004 Status Reports? Where Do I Send Public Comments?...............................................................................................i-7 Executive Summary …………………………………………………………… ..................................................i-9 Subgoal 1: Can we all eat any fish?..............................................................................................................1-1 Status, Indicators, Challenges, and Next Steps Overview………………………………………….1-1 Fish Consumption Advisories……………………………………………...............................................1-2 PCB Advisories………………………………………………………… ....................................................1-3 Mercury Advisories……………………………………………………… ................................................1-4 Collaborative Lake Michigan Strategy to Address Impaired Waters…………….......................1-5 Status of Mercury TMDLs in the Basin ……………………………………… ......................................1-7 Sources of Mercury .............................................................................................................................1-8 Polutant Minimization Program .........................................................................................................1-8 Next Steps………………………………………………………………....................................................1-8 GLRC Goals and Recommendations for Persistent Bioaccumulative Toxics Group................1-9 Illinois’ Mercury Actions ......................................................................................................................1-11 Indiana’s Mercury Actions .................................................................................................................1-13 Michigan’s Mercury Actions..............................................................................................................1-15 Wisconsin’s Mercury Actions .............................................................................................................1-17 Subgoal 2: Can we drink the water?................................................................. ..........................................2-1 Status, Indicators, Challenges, and Next Steps Overview………………………………………….2-1 Drinking Water Contaminants……………………………………………............................................2-1 Drinking Water Monitoring and Reporting……………………………..............................................2-2 Water Infrastructure Security .............................................................................................................2-4 Drinking Water Security in the Lake Michigan Basin......................................................................2-4 Inadvertent Water Contamination………………………………………...........................................2-4 Water Quality Tracking………………………………………………… ................................................2-5 Drinking Water State Revolving Fund……………… ........................................................................2-6 Drinking Water Quality Reports………………………………………..................................................2-6 Next Steps………………………………………………………………....................................................2-6 Lake Michigan LaMP 2006 TC-2 GLRC Coastal Health Drinking Water Related Goals and Recommendations........................ 2-8 Subgoal 3: Can we swim in the water?................................................................................. ..................... 3-1 Status, Indicators, Challenges, and Next Steps Overview………………………………………… 3-1 Background......................................................................................................................................... 3-2 Progress on Developing and Implementing Beach Monitoring and Notification Plans ......... 3-3 Illinois..................................................................................................................................................... 3-3 Indiana ................................................................................................................................................. 3-4 Michigan.............................................................................................................................................. 3-5 Wisconsin ............................................................................................................................................. 3-8 Public Communication...................................................................................................................... 3-9 BEACH Watch ..................................................................................................................................... 3-9 BEACH NET ........................................................................................................................................... 3-10 Beach Cast.......................................................................................................................................... 3-10 Adoption of Bacteria Criteria That Meet National Standards..................................................... 3-10 Next Steps……………………………………………………………… ................................................... 3-11 GLRC Coastal Health Beach related Goals and Recommendations ....................................... 3-12 Sungoal 4: Are all habitats healthy, naturally diverse, and sufficient to sustain viable biological communities?....................................................................................................... ........................................ 4-1 Status, Indicators, Challenges, and Next Steps Overview………………………………………… 4-1 Background......................................................................................................................................... 4-2 Threats to the Food Web Foundation ............................................................................................. 4-2 Status of Important Fish Species at the Top of the Food Chain................................................. 4-2 Lake Sturgeon……………………………………………… ..................................................... 4-5 Lake Trout…………………………………………………......................................................... 4-6 Perch ....................................................................................................................................... 4-6 Land Use Changes ............................................................................................................................. 4-7 Wetland Programs.............................................................................................................................. 4-7 Buffer Strips........................................................................................................................................... 4-9 Next Steps……………………………………………………………....................................................... 4-9 GLRC Habitat Goals and Recommendations ............................................................................... 4-11 Subgaol 5: Does the public have access to abundant open space, shoreline, and natural areas, and does the public have enhanced opportunities for interaction with the Lake Michigan ecosystem?..................................................................................................................................................... 5-1 Status, Indicators, Challenges, and Next Steps Overview………………………………………… 5-1 Background........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WLSSB Map and Guide
    WISCONSIN LAKE SUPERIOR SCENIC BYWAY (WLSSB) DEVILS ISLAND NORTH TWIN ISLAND MAP KEY ROCKY ISLAND SOUTH TWIN ISLAND CAT ISLAND WISCONSIN LAKE SUPERIOR SCENIC BYWAY APOSTLE ISLANDS BEAR ISLAND NATIONAL LAKESHORE KIOSK LOCATION IRONWOOD ISLAND SCENIC BYWAY NEAR HERBSTER SAILING ON LAKE SUPERIOR LOST CREEK FALLS KIOSKS CONTAIN DETAILED INFORMATION ABOUT EACH LOCATION SAND ISLAND VISITOR INFORMATION OUTER ISLAND YORK ISLAND SEE REVERSE FOR COMPLETE LIST µ OTTER ISLAND FEDERAL HIGHWAY MANITOU ISLAND RASPBERRY ISLAND STATE HIGHWAY COUNTY HIGHWAY 7 EAGLE ISLAND NATIONAL PARKS ICE CAVES AT MEYERS BEACH BAYFIELD PENINSULA AND THE APOSTLE ISLANDS FROM MT. ASHWABAY & NATIONAL FOREST LANDS well as a Heritage Museum and a Maritime Museum. Pick up Just across the street is the downtown area with a kayak STATE PARKS K OAK ISLAND STOCKTON ISLAND some fresh or smoked fish from a commercial fishery for a outfitter, restaurants, more lodging and a historic general & STATE FOREST LANDS 6 GULL ISLAND taste of Lake Superior or enjoy local flavors at one of the area store that has a little bit of everything - just like in the “old (!13! RED CLIFF restaurants. If you’re brave, try the whitefish livers – they’re a days,” but with a modern flair. Just off the Byway you can MEYERS BEACH COUNTY PARKS INDIAN RESERVATION local specialty! visit two popular waterfalls: Siskiwit Falls and Lost Creek & COUNTY FOREST LANDS Falls. West of Cornucopia you will find the Lost Creek Bog HERMIT ISLAND Walk the Brownstone Trail along an old railroad grade or CORNUCOPIA State Natural Area. Lost Creek Bog forms an estuary at the take the Gil Larson Nature Trail (part of the Big Ravine Trail MICHIGAN ISLAND mouths of three small creeks (Lost Creek 1, 2, and 3) where System) which starts by a historic apple shed, continues RESERVATION LANDS they empty into Lake Superior at Siskiwit Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Apostle Islands National Lakehore Geologic Resources Inventory
    Geologic Resources Inventory Scoping Summary Apostle Islands National Lakeshore Geologic Resources Division Prepared by Trista L. Thornberry-Ehrlich National Park Service August 7, 2010 US Department of the Interior The Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) provides each of 270 identified natural area National Park System units with a geologic scoping meeting and summary (this document), a digital geologic map, and a geologic resources inventory report. The purpose of scoping is to identify geologic mapping coverage and needs, distinctive geologic processes and features, resource management issues, and monitoring and research needs. Geologic scoping meetings generate an evaluation of the adequacy of existing geologic maps for resource management, provide an opportunity to discuss park-specific geologic management issues, and if possible include a site visit with local experts. The National Park Service held a GRI scoping meeting for Apostle Islands National Lakeshore on July 20-21, 2010 both out in the field on a boating site visit from Bayfield, Wisconsin, and at the headquarters building for the Great Lakes Network in Ashland, Wisconsin. Jim Chappell (Colorado State University [CSU]) facilitated the discussion of map coverage and Bruce Heise (NPS-GRD) led the discussion regarding geologic processes and features at the park. Dick Ojakangas from the University of Minnesota at Duluth and Laurel Woodruff from the U.S. Geological Survey presented brief geologic overviews of the park and surrounding area. Participants at the meeting included NPS staff from the park and Geologic Resources Division; geologists from the University of Minnesota at Duluth, Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey, and U.S. Geological Survey; and cooperators from Colorado State University (see table 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Compact Power, Inc. Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application, Holland, Michigan
    DOE/EA-1709 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR COMPACT POWER, INC. ELECTRIC DRIVE VEHICLE BATTERY AND COMPONENT MANUFACTURING INITIATIVE APPLICATION, HOLLAND, MICHIGAN U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory March 2010 DOE/EA-1709 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR COMPACT POWER, INC. ELECTRIC DRIVE VEHICLE BATTERY AND COMPONENT MANUFACTURING INITIATIVE APPLICATION, HOLLAND, MICHIGAN U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory March 2010 COVER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) TITLE: Final Environmental Assessment for Compact Power, Inc. Electric Drive Vehicle Battery and Component Manufacturing Initiative Application, Holland, Michigan CONTACT: For additional copies or more information concerning this environmental assessment (EA), please contact: Mr. Mark W. Lusk U.S. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory P.O. Box 880 3610 Collins Ferry Road Morgantown, WV 26507-0880 Telephone: (304) 285-4145 Email: [email protected]. ABSTRACT: DOE prepared this EA to evaluate the potential environmental consequences of providing an American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act; Public Law 111- 5, 123 Stat. 115) grant to Compact Power, Inc. to construct and operate a high-volume manufacturing plant to build advanced lithium-ion cells and batteries. The cells and batteries would be for use in automotive applications including but not limited to hybrid electric, plug-in hybrid electric, pure electric vehicles for commercial purposes, and military hybrid vehicles, as well as for aviation, smart grid support, broadband backup power, and energy storage for renewable energy. DOE’s Proposed Action is to provide $151 million in financial assistance in a cost-sharing arrangement with the project proponent, Compact Power, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Apostle Islands National Lakeshore Geologic Resources Inventory Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Apostle Islands National Lakeshore Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2015/972 ON THIS PAGE An opening in an ice-fringed sea cave reveals ice flows on Lake Superior. Photograph by Neil Howk (National Park Service) taken in winter 2008. ON THE COVER Wind and associated wave activity created a window in Devils Island Sandstone at Devils Island. Photograph by Trista L. Thornberry-Ehrlich (Colorado State University) taken in summer 2010. Apostle Islands National Lakeshore Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/GRD/NRR—2015/972 Trista L. Thornberry-Ehrlich Colorado State University Research Associate National Park Service Geologic Resources Division Geologic Resources Inventory PO Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225 May 2015 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Programmatic Environmental Assessment Michigan Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP)
    Programmatic Environmental Assessment Michigan Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP) Farm Service Agency United States Department of Agriculture February 2006 THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK 2006 Michigan CREP FINAL Programmatic Environmental Assessment Summary and Introduction Cover Sheet Mandated Action: The United States Department of Agriculture, Commodity Credit Corporation (USDA/CCC) and the State of Michigan have agreed to implement the Michigan Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP), a component of the national Conservation Reserve Program. USDA is provided the statutory authority by the provisions of the Food Security Act of 1985, as amended (16 U.S.C. 3830 et seq.), and the regulations at 7 CFR 1410. In accordance with the 1985 Act, USDA/CCC is authorized to enroll lands through December 31, 2007. The Farm Service Agency (FSA) of USDA proposes to enter into a CREP agreement with the State of Michigan covering the counties of Allegan, Arenac, Bay, Clare, Genesee, Gladwin, Gratiot, Hillsdale, Huron, Iosco, Isabella, Jackson, Lapeer, Lenawee, Livingston, Mecosta, Midland, Monroe, Montcalm, Oakland, Ogemaw, Osecola, Ottawa, Roscommon, Saginaw, Sanilac, Shiawassee, Tuscola, and Washetenaw. CREP is a voluntary land conservation program for State agricultural landowners. Type of Document: Programmatic Environmental Assessment (PEA) Lead Agency: United States Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency Sponsoring Agencies: Michigan Department of Agriculture Cooperating Agencies: United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) For Further Information: Dale A. Allen, Conservation Chief, Michigan State FSA Office 3001 Coolidge Road, Suite 100 East Lansing, MI 48823 (517) 324-5105 Comments: This PEA was prepared in accordance with the United States Department of Agriculture FSA National Environmental Policy Act Implementation Procedures found in 7 CFR part 1b and 7 CFR 799, as well as the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Public Law 91-190, 42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Township Master Plan - 2011 Park Township Master Plan - 2011 1
    abundant natural beauty rural & agricultural character walkable community alternative transportation culture of collaboration sustainable redevelopment balanced housing quality development Park Township Master Plan - 2011 Park Township Master Plan - 2011 1 Park Township Overview CHAPTER ONE Park Township is located in Ottawa County on the Lake Michigan shore and is within Holland’s metropolitan area. Consequently, it is influenced both economically and culturally by the city. While most of the 21.3 square mile township is north of Lake Macatawa a small portion is located on the south shore. It is physically separated by the lake and the City of Holland from the rest of the township. Because of its attractive location, Park Township has diverse land uses that range along the lakeshore from areas dotted with parks, large estate homes, and historic resort communities to older, more mod- est homes and cabins perched atop high dunes. This setting helps shape the character of Park Township. Among its major parks are Ottawa County’s Tunnel Park, a popular beach with scenic views WELCOME TO PARK TOWNSHIP and dunes and Holland State Park, one of the most visited in the State Park system. It strongly influences the character of the north shore of Lake Macatawa. “Big Red,” the historic lighthouse on the south side of the Lake Macatawa Channel, has long been a symbol of the Township and the entire Holland lakeshore area. The South Shore is characterized by seasonal cottages, an historic resort enclave, lakefront estate homes, a large marina and well-kept, traditional residential neighborhoods. The area is strongly influenced by its location adjacent to neighborhoods in northwest Holland.
    [Show full text]
  • Apostle Islands National Lakeshore
    National Park Service Park News & Planner ‑ 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior The official newspaper of Around the Archipelago Apostle Islands National Lakeshore Pardon the Mess... The Greatest Show on the Big Lake! Closed For Renovation You’d haVE TO GO BACK TO 1929 TO SEE AnytHING LIKE ‑ the 2013 Apostle Islands light station preservation project. Big We know how disappointing a “Closed for happenings at Michigan Island Light: workmen, barges, scaffolding, Renovation” sign can be. We hope that painters, roofers, sawyers, carpenters, glaziers, and masons, all the inconvenience of not climbing the light just busy as beavers. And not just Michigan, but Devils, La Pointe, towers this summer will be rewarded by Outer, and Sand lights too. This is the biggest historic preservation great visitor experiences in the future. project that Apostle Islands National Lakeshore has ever While the National Park Service will work undertaken, and the biggest re-investment in these historic lights to minimize public impacts during the ever made by the federal government. There may NEVER have been light station repair work, some closures a summer this busy at the Apostle Islands’ lighthouses. will be necessary for public safety and to allow workers access to the light stations. Local folks and park visitors have heard rumblings about this for Buildings will be closed to visitation while several years as the planning, design, and contract preparation work work is in progress, as will the adjacent progressed. The lights will be seeing some old friends, and making grounds. The normal volunteer “keepers” some new ones. C3, LLC, a major national construction firm, is the will not be in residence during construction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Study Area
    1 PREFACE Part 305, Natural Rivers, of P.A. 451 of 1994 authorizes the Natural Resources Commission to establish a system of "natural" rivers in the state and to provide for their preservation, protection and enhancement. As a result of this charge, the Michigan Department of Natural Resources has studied the White River and its tributaries for possible inclusion in the natural rivers system. The river system and adjacent lands were investigated to determine: (1) aesthetic and historic values, (2) free-flowing condition--now and prospectively, (3) water quality, (4) fish, plant and wildlife resources, and (5) ecological values. The river ranked high in such values and will be proposed for inclusion in the Michigan natural rivers system. A preliminary river management plan has been prepared with the participation of concerned public officials, property owners and citizens and will be presented to the public at hearings in the area. After public hearings, the Natural Resources Commission may designate the river or portions of it as either a Wilderness, Wild Scenic or Country-Scenic River. This report is the preliminary river plan for the White River, which is tentatively proposed as a Country-Scenic River. Briefly, the Country-Scenic River is a stream in an agricultural setting with narrow bands of woods or pastoral borders. Farms and other developments may be visible from the river and it may be readily accessible by road. It may have undergone some impounding and its waters should meet established water quality standards. The plan provides: (1) a physical description of the river, surrounding lands and nearby structures, (2) reviews values of the river and factors affecting its future nature and use, and (3) provides a plan for its management so as to preserve, protect and enhance the natural qualities of the rive area.
    [Show full text]
  • White River Rides
    White River Rides Ride The Edge at Timbers Edge Campground 2020 Hesperia, Michigan The rides will be held in the Little Manistee National Forest and private land. Come ride in the freshness of the Spring, the warmth of the Summer and the beauty of changing colors in the Fall. On trails, two-tracks and dirt roads. Come early/stay late - horse camping available! Come enjoy the new trails, we are working on more! SPRING SUMMER LABOR DAY* May 2-3, 2020 June 13-14, 2020 September 5 - 7, 2020 Vet-in: May 1 late afternoon Vet-in: June 12 late afternoon Vet-in: September 4 late afternoon Early entry deadline: Apr. 24, 2020 Early entry deadline: June 5, 2020 Early entry deadline: Aug. 28, 2020 *Three prepaid entries required for 100 mile END, deadline August 9 Head Vet/Judge’s decision is final. All rides will conform to UMECRA, AERC, IAHA, OAATS and APHC standards. Negative Coggins test is required. SPRING RIDE: May 2, Saturday: 25 LD, 50 Endurance, 25 mile Competitive, 35* mile Competitive, AERC Introductory Ride May 3, Sunday: 25 LD, 50 Endurance, 25 mile Competitive *35 mile Competitive must have at least 3 entries SUMMER RIDE: June 13, Saturday: 25 LD, 50 Endurance, 25 mile Competitive, 35* mile Competitive, AERC Introductory Ride June 14, Sunday: 25 LD, 50 Endurance, 25 mile Competitive *35 mile Competitive must have at least 3 entries LABOR DAY PIONEER RIDE: Sept 5, Saturday: 25 LD, 55 Endurance, 25 mile Competitive, 35* mile Competitive, AERC Introductory Ride Sept 6, Sunday: 25 LD, 50 Endurance, 100† mile endurance, 25 mile Competitive, 35* mile Competitive Sept 7, Monday: 25 LD, 50 Endurance, 25 mile Competitive †Three prepaid entries required by Aug 9 *35 mile Competitive must have at least 3 entries 2020 SEASONAL HIGH MILEAGE AWARD: Prize awarded for the Equine Team with the most miles.
    [Show full text]
  • ATLAS of the SPAWNING and NURSERY AREAS of GREAT LAKES FISHES Volume II - Lake Superior
    Biological Services Program FWS/OBS-82/52 SEPTEMBER 1982 ATLAS OF THE SPAWNING AND NURSERY AREAS OF GREAT LAKES FISHES Volume II - Lake Superior Great Lake - St. Lawrence Seaway Navigation Season Extension Program Fish and Wildlife Service Corps of Engineers U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Department of the Army The Biological Services Program was established within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to supply scientific information and methodologies on key environmental issues that Impact fish and wildlife resources and their supporting ecosystems. The mission of the program is as follows: o To strengthen the Fish and Wildlife Service in its role as a primary source of information on national fish and wild- life resources, particularly in respect to environmental impact assessment. o To gather, analyze, and present information that will aid decisionmakers in the identification and resolution of problems associated with major changes in land and water use. o To provide better ecological information and evaluation for Department of the Interior development programs, such as those relatfng to energy development. Information developed by the Biological Services Program is intended for use in the planning and decisionmaking process to prevent or minimize the impact of development on fish and wildlife. Research activities and technlcal assistance services are based on an analysis of the issues, a determination of the decisionmakers involved and their informatlon needs, and an evaluation of the state of the art to identify information gaps and to determine priorities. This is a strategy that will ensure that the products produced and disseminated are timely and useful.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Michigan Lamp 2000 Chapters Into a Comprehensive Document Is Summarized in Table ES-1 at the End of This Executive Summary
    Lake Michigan LaMP CONTENTS Section Page Acknowledgements Preface.......................................................................... P-1 Executive Summary............................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1 Lake Michigan LaMP Overview: Program Structure, Scope,cale, and Public Involvement 1.1 About This Chapter .......................................................... 1-1 1.2 About the LaMP – Why ...................................................... 1-1 1.3 About the LaMP – Who ...................................................... 1-2 1.4 About the LaMP – Program Structure ........................................... 1-2 1.4.1 Management Committee ............................................... 1-2 1.4.2 The Technical Coordinating Committees .................................. 1-3 1.4.3 The Lake Michigan Monitoring Coordinating Council ........................ 1-3 1.4.4 The Lake Michigan Forum ............................................. 1-3 1.5 About the LaMP- How ....................................................... 1-4 1.5.1 The Document and Reporting ........................................... 1-4 1.5.2 Science and Models: The Lake Michigan Mass Balance Project ................ 1-4 1.6 About the LaMP – Scope ..................................................... 1-5 1.7 About the LaMP – Where ..................................................... 1-6 1.8 The LaMP Document – Organization............................................ 1-9 1.9 The LaMP Document – Public Involvement ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inside: Kalamazoo, 19-21 January 2012 Annual Early Registration Due 19 Dec
    Volume 15, No. 4 SERVING MICHIGAN'S COACHES December 2011 40th MHSFCA Winners Circle Clinic Inside: Kalamazoo, 19-21 January 2012 Annual Early Registration Due 19 Dec. See page 6 Important Dates .............................2 Schedule page 5 Notes ..............................................3 Recruiting Fairs Gain Popularity Women of the Year .........................3 Operation Michigan Guard ...........3 Newsletter Delivery .......................3 All Star Selection Meetings ...........3 Board of Directors Election ............4 Kalamazoo Clinic Schedule ............5 Kalamazoo Registration .................6 Nike Mt Pleasant Clinic ................7 Glazier Clinics ...............................8 Assistant Coach Awards ..............10 Spicer Awards ..............................10 Honorary Awards ........................10 MHSCA Hall of Fame .................10 Leadership Conference .................11 Above Taylor Kennedy coach, Brian Obrycki discusses prospects with Hope College coach, Mike Ricketts. MHSFCA on the Web ..................13 The recruiting fairs save college coaches time and money and allow high school Regional Coaches of the Year .......14 coaches to do their job, promoting their athletes, much more efficiently to colleges including schools that they and their athletes may otherwise not have considered. This Academic All State Teams............15 was the biggest year yet for attendance as more and more Michigan coaches realize the Academic All State Individuals ...16 advantages they offer. State Coaches of the
    [Show full text]