DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Oklahoma Graduate College

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Oklahoma Graduate College UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE REPURPOSING THE COMPARATIVE METHOD FOR PAWNEE LANGUAGE AND DIALECT REVITALIZATION A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN APPLIED LINGUISTIC ANTHROPOLOGY By ZACHARY RICE Norman, Oklahoma 2016 REPURPOSING THE COMPARATIVE METHOD FOR PAWNEE LANGUAGE AND DIALECT REVITALIZATION A THESIS APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY BY ______________________________ Dr. Racquel-María Sapién, Chair ______________________________ Dr. Marcia Haag ______________________________ Dr. Gus Palmer, Jr. © Copyright by ZACHARY RICE 2016 All Rights Reserved. This work is dedicated to the past, present, and future generations of Pawnee people. May we always be adamant in regard to who we are and where we come from. In addition, this work is dedicated to my uncle, the late Thomas E. KnifeChief. He is one of the men responsible for my interest in the revitalization of our Pawnee language. Acknowledgements My graduate thesis would not have been possible without the previous work carried out by Pawnee and Arikara speakers and researchers. I am indebted to the numerous named and unnamed speakers who worked with John B. Dunbar, Gene Weltfish, Dr. Douglas Parks, and Dr. Francesca Merlan. I am also extremely grateful to Dr. Gene Weltfish and Dr. Douglas Parks for their contributions to the linguistic analysis of the Pawnee language. I am also very grateful to my committee chair, Dr. Racquel-María Sapién, for your earnest support and guidance throughout this process. There is no way I would have completed this or met any of my deadlines without you. I would also like to thank Dr. Gus Palmer, Jr. for serving on my committee and making me laugh and enjoy this process, for your kind words, and for keeping your door open to chat with me. Additionally, I would like to thank Dr. Marcia Haag for serving on my committee and helping me gain a better understanding of Pawnee verbal morphology. Without you, I would have been beating my head against the wall alone. Moreover, I appreciate all the support and prayers from those in the Pawnee tribal community. Your support reminded me why I am doing this to begin with. I especially want to thank all my friends and family for keeping me sane throughout this process. To my nephews, Gabe and Mason, spending time with you both and watching you reminded me to take the time to slow down and enjoy life. Finally, to Breanna, your persistence and dedication to your education for the betterment of the People is an inspiration to me. There is no way I would have completed this without you. Without you or Racquel, I would still be twiddling my thumbs hoping this paper would magically write itself. Now I can say this paper is finally finished. iv Table of Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ................................................................................................................... xi List of Figures ................................................................................................................ xiii Abstract .......................................................................................................................... xiv Chapter 1: Introduction to the Pawnee and Arikara .......................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 Background ................................................................................................................. 4 Language Statuses ............................................................................................... 10 Existing Publications on the Pawnee Language ....................................................... 12 Existing Publications on the Arikara Language ........................................................ 13 Existing Comparative Caddoan Publications ............................................................ 14 Utilizing the Existing Pawnee and Arikara Publications .......................................... 15 Goals of This Study .................................................................................................. 16 Chapter 2: Orthographic Conventions and Overview of Pawnee and Arikara Sound Systems ............................................................................................................... 18 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 18 Arikara Orthography ................................................................................................. 19 Pawnee Orthography ................................................................................................. 19 Arikara Sound System .............................................................................................. 20 Arikara Consonants ............................................................................................. 20 Arikara Vowels ................................................................................................... 23 Pawnee Sound System .............................................................................................. 24 v Pawnee Consonants ............................................................................................ 25 Pawnee Vowels ................................................................................................... 27 Arikara and Pawnee Phonology ................................................................................ 29 Chapter 3: Comparative Arikara and Pawnee ................................................................. 30 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 30 Previously Established Consonant Correspondences ............................................... 32 Sound Correspondence 1: Arikara p: South Band Pawnee p: Skiri Pawnee p ......... 32 Analysis............................................................................................................... 33 Sound Correspondence 2: Arikara t: South Band Pawnee t: Skiri Pawnee t ............ 34 Analysis............................................................................................................... 35 Sound Correspondence 3a: Arikara k: South Band Pawnee k: Skiri Pawnee k ........ 36 Analysis............................................................................................................... 36 Sound Correspondence 3b: Arikara č: South Band Pawnee k: Skiri Pawnee k ........ 37 Analysis............................................................................................................... 38 Sound Correspondence 4: Arikara ʾ: South Band Pawnee ʾ: Skiri Pawnee ʾ ........... 39 Analysis............................................................................................................... 40 Sound Correspondence 5: Arikara s: South Band Pawnee c: Skiri Pawnee c .......... 41 Analysis............................................................................................................... 41 Sound Correspondence 6a: Arikara x: South Band Pawnee s: Skiri Pawnee s ......... 42 Analysis............................................................................................................... 43 Sound Correspondence 6b: Arikara š: South Band Pawnee s: Skiri Pawnee s ......... 44 Analysis............................................................................................................... 44 Sound Correspondence 7a: Arikara -h-: South Band Pawnee -h-: Skiri Pawnee -h- 46 vi Analysis............................................................................................................... 47 Sound Correspondence 7b: Arikara h-: South Band Pawnee ø-: Skiri Pawnee h- ... 47 Analysis............................................................................................................... 48 Sound Correspondence 8a: Arikara -w-: South Band Pawnee -w-: Skiri Pawnee -w- ....................................................................................................................... 48 Analysis............................................................................................................... 49 Sound Correspondence 8b: Arikara w-: South Band Pawnee p-/w-: Skiri Pawnee p- ....................................................................................................................... 50 Analysis............................................................................................................... 50 Sound Correspondence 9a: Arikara r: South Band Pawnee r: Skiri Pawnee r ......... 51 Analysis............................................................................................................... 52 Sound Correspondence 9b: Arikara n-: South Band Pawnee r-: Skiri Pawnee r- .... 52 Analysis............................................................................................................... 53 Sound Correspondence 10: Arikara n: South Band Pawnee r: Skiri Pawnee r ........ 53 Analysis............................................................................................................... 54 Previously Established Vowel Correspondences ...................................................... 55 Sound Correspondence 11: Arikara i: South Band
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sahnish (Arikara) Ethnobotany
    Kindscher, L. Yellow Bird, M. Yellow Bird & Sutton Yellow M. Bird, Yellow L. Kindscher, Sahnish (Arikara) Ethnobotany This book describes the traditional use of wild plants among the Arikara (Sahnish) for food, medicine, craft, and other uses. The Arikara grew corn, hunted and foraged, and traded with other tribes in the northern Great Plains. Their villages were located along the Sahnish (Arikara) Missouri River in northern South Dakota and North Dakota. Today, many of them live at Fort Berthold Reservation, North Dakota, as part of the MHA (Mandan, Hidatsa, Arikara) Ethnobotany Nation. We document the use of 106 species from 31 plant families, based primarily on the work of Melvin Gilmore, who recorded Arikara ethnobotany from 1916 to 1935. Gilmore interviewed elders for their stories and accounts of traditional plant use, collected material goods, and wrote a draft manuscript, but was not able to complete it due to debilitating illness. Fortunately, his field notes, manuscripts, and papers were archived and form the core of the present volume. Gilmore’s detailed description is augmented here with historical accounts of the Arikara gleaned from the journals of Great Plains explorers—Lewis and Clark, John Bradbury, Pierre Tabeau, and others. Additional plant uses and nomenclature is based on the field notes of linguist Douglas R. Parks, who carried out detailed documentation of the Sahnish (Arikara) Ethnobotany tribe’s language from 1970–2001. Although based on these historical sources, the present volume features updated modern botanical nomenclature, contemporary spelling and interpretation of Arikara plant names, and color photographs and range maps of each species.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2003 We Proceeded on ! 1 Letters Reflections on Charlottesville Kickoff
    Contents Letters: Charlottesville; astronaut; fuzzy math; bears; novel 2 From the Directors: Old words, new challenge 4 From the Bicentennial Council: L&C as a lens on history 5 Eagle Feather Goes to Washington 10 The Arikara’s journey and his untimely demise had long-term consequences for U.S.-Indian relations By Mark Chalkley Charlottesville Journal 13 A cold but inspiring kickoff for the L&C Bicentennial Photo Essay by Taylor Haynes Washington, p. 11 On the Rivers with Lewis and Clark 17 The Corps of Discovery rowed, towed, paddled, poled and sailed more than 9,000 miles By Verne Huser Meriwether Lewis’s Ingenious Iron Boat 25 “The Experiment,” whose design owed much to the bark canoe, was a brilliant concept but a practical failure By Mark W. Jordan Reviews 36 Exploring Lewis and Clark; Brian Hall’s novel; Moore and Haynes; Slosberg CD. In Brief: Fincastle; L&C glossary; Hamilton’s Charlottesville, p. 15 six-volume set; Sierra Club trail guide; two new cookbooks L&C Roundup 46 Olson moves on; extending the L&C Trail; Cathlapotle project; L&C in other publications; for the record Passages 48 LCTHF co-founder Bill Sherman On the cover We chose Lewis and Clark on the Lower Columbia, painted in 1905 by Charles M. Russell, for the cover because of its obvious tie-in with “On the Rivers with Lewis and Clark,” Verne Huser’s article about the Corps of Discovery’s watercraft, which begins on page 17. (Painting courtesy the Amon Carter Museum, Fort Worth, Texas.) Russell’s depiction of the explorers’ encounter with Pacific Coast Indians is full of drama but contains errors of fact and historical interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Affiliation Statement for Buffalo National River
    CULTURAL AFFILIATION STATEMENT BUFFALO NATIONAL RIVER, ARKANSAS Final Report Prepared by María Nieves Zedeño Nicholas Laluk Prepared for National Park Service Midwest Region Under Contract Agreement CA 1248-00-02 Task Agreement J6068050087 UAZ-176 Bureau of Applied Research In Anthropology The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85711 June 1, 2008 Table of Contents and Figures Summary of Findings...........................................................................................................2 Chapter One: Study Overview.............................................................................................5 Chapter Two: Cultural History of Buffalo National River ................................................15 Chapter Three: Protohistoric Ethnic Groups......................................................................41 Chapter Four: The Aboriginal Group ................................................................................64 Chapter Five: Emigrant Tribes...........................................................................................93 References Cited ..............................................................................................................109 Selected Annotations .......................................................................................................137 Figure 1. Buffalo National River, Arkansas ........................................................................6 Figure 2. Sixteenth Century Polities and Ethnic Groups (after Sabo 2001) ......................47
    [Show full text]
  • University of Oklahoma Graduate College Bible
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE BIBLE TRANSLATION AND LANGUAGE RENEWAL: A COLLABORATIVE APPROACH A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN APPLIED LINGUISTIC ANTHROPOLOGY By JOSH CAUDILL Norman, Oklahoma 2016 BIBLE TRANSLATION AND LANGUAGE RENEWAL: A COLLABORATIVE APPROACH A THESIS APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY BY ___________________________________ Dr. Sean O’Neill, Chair ___________________________________ Dr. Racquel Sapien ___________________________________ Dr. Gus Palmer © Copyright by JOSH CAUDILL 2016 All Rights Reserved. Table of Contents Abstract vii Introduction 1 1. Identity and Agency 5 1.1. Identity and Essentialism 5 1.2. Language Ideology and Academic Authority 16 1.3. Religious Pluralism, or Not 23 2. Collaborative Research & Bible Translation 29 2.1. What are We Really Doing Here? 29 2.2. Benefits to the Linguist 32 2.3. Benefits to the Anthropologist 37 2.4. Benefits to the Speech Community Member 42 2.5. Benefits to the Theologian 45 3. Translation Philosophy 50 3.1. Translation: History and Philosophy 50 3.2. Translation and Beyond 55 3.3. Bible Translation, in Particular 58 4. Hebrew Poetry & Poetic Translation 63 5. Pawnee Texts and Translation 84 iv 5.1. Approaching Translation 84 5.2. Psalm 93 86 5.3. Generic Comparisons 91 5.4. The Limitations of This Project, and Moving Forward 95 Closing Remarks 96 Bibliography 100 v Tables & Figures Figure 3a: NLT Translation Spectrum 59 Table 4a: Psalm 119 77 Figure 5a: “A Woman Welcomes the Warriors” 89 vi Abstract Many indigenous languages face attrition globally as the languages of the West continue to grow in influence.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of the Comparative Method to Morpheme-Final Nasals in Nivkh Halm, R
    Application of the Comparative Method to Morpheme-Final Nasals in Nivkh Halm, R. & Slater, J. Application of the Comparative Method to Morpheme-Final Nasals in Nivkh Robert Halm 1 Bloomington, IN, USA Jay Slater Pittsburgh, PA, USA Following up on recent work, we consider morpheme-final nasals in the Nivkh language family of northeast Asia using the Standard Comparative Method, and attempt to reconstruct the inventory and morphophonemic behavior of morpheme-final nasal phonemes in Proto-Nivkh (PN). Previous work has pointed towards PN nasals at four loci, /*m/, /*n/, /*ɲ/, /*ŋ/, of which at least /*ŋ/ could be phonemically either “strong”, triggering fricatives to surface across morpheme juncture, or “weak”, triggering plosives to surface; with weak /*ŋ/ place-assimilating to following plosives across morpheme juncture, and weak /*n/ and weak /*ŋ/ elided in the Amur and West Sakhalin lects. However, with the benefit of more and better data than were available to previous authors, we find instead that elision must have been conditioned by a feature other than the strong-weak contrast (provisionally, length), but which interacted with the strong-weak contrast (“short” strong nasals were inextant), and that this “length” contrast also conditioned assimilation or non-assimilation of final /*ŋ/ (only “short” weak /*ŋ/ assimilated, not “long” weak /*ŋ/). We confirm that the strong-weak morphophonemic contrast existed for at least /*m/, /*ɲ/, and /*ŋ/ (rather than only for /*ŋ/), and the “length” contrast for /*n/ as well as /*ŋ/. Keywords: Nivkh, Gilyak, Proto-Nivkh, nasal, Comparative Method 1 Address correspondence to: [email protected] Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 1 Application of the Comparative Method to Morpheme-Final Nasals in Nivkh Halm, R.
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistic History and Language Diversity in India: Views and Counterviews
    J Biosci (2019) 44:62 Indian Academy of Sciences DOI: 10.1007/s12038-019-9879-1 (0123456789().,-volV)(0123456789().,-volV) Linguistic history and language diversity in India: Views and counterviews SONAL KULKARNI-JOSHI Deccan College, Pune, India (Email, [email protected]) This paper addresses the theme of the seminar from the perspective of historical linguistics. It introduces the construct of ‘language family’ and then proceeds to a discussion of contact and the dynamics of linguistic exchange among the main language families of India over several millennia. Some prevalent hypotheses to explain the creation of India as a linguistic area are presented. The ‘substratum view’ is critically assessed. Evidence from historical linguistics in support of two dominant hypotheses –‘the Aryan migration view’ and ‘the out-of-India hypothesis’–is presented and briefly assessed. In conclusion, it is observed that the current understanding in historical linguistics favours the Aryan migration view though the ‘substratum view’ is questionable. Keywords. Aryan migration; historical linguistics; language family; Out-of-India hypothesis; substratum 1. Introduction the basis of social, political and cultural criteria more than linguistic criteria. The aim of this paper is to lend a linguistic perspective on This vast number of languages is classified into four (or the issue of human diversity and ancestry in India to the non- six) language families or genealogical types: Austro-Asiatic linguists at this seminar. The paper is an overview of the (Munda), Dravidian, Indo-Aryan (IA) and Tibeto-Burman; major views and evidences gleaned from the available more recently, two other language families have been literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Publications by AIW Members
    Books, 113 Gidley, Mick. The Grass Shall Grow: Helen Post Photographs the Native American West. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2020. Strathman, Nicole. Through a Native Lens: American Indian Photography. The Charles M. Russell Center Series on Art and Photography of the American West (No. 37). Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2020. d'Oney, J. Daniel. A Kingdom of Water: Adaptation and Survival in the Houma Nation. Indians of the Southeast. Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press, 2020. Fontaine, Jerry. Our Hearts Are as One Fire. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2020. Baxter, Jamie. Inalienable Properties. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2020. Cannon, Martin J. Men, Masculinity, and the Indian Act. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2020. Bouchard, Michel, Sebastien Malette and Guillaume Marcotte. Bois-Brûlés. Vancouver: University Press of British Columbia, 2020. d'Oney, J. Daniel. A Kingdom of Water. Indians of the Southeast. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 2020. Usbeck, Frank. Ceremonial Storytelling: Ritual and Narrative in Post-9/11 US Wars. American Culture 14. Berlin: Peter Lang, 2019. Gergaud, Sophie. Cinéastes (autochtones), la souveraineté culturelle en action. Cinéma. Laval: WARM Editions, 2019. Kelderman, Frank. Authorized Agents: Publication and Diplomacy in the Era of Indian Removal. Native Traces. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2019. Van Groesen, Michiel and Larry E. Tise, eds. Theodore de Bry - America: The Complete Plates, 1590-1602. Cologne: Taschen, 2019. Deloria, Philip J. Becoming Mary Sully. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2019. Hart, E. Richard. American Indian History on Trial: Historical Expertise in Tribal Litigation. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Indo-European Linguistics: an Introduction Indo-European Linguistics an Introduction
    This page intentionally left blank Indo-European Linguistics The Indo-European language family comprises several hun- dred languages and dialects, including most of those spoken in Europe, and south, south-west and central Asia. Spoken by an estimated 3 billion people, it has the largest number of native speakers in the world today. This textbook provides an accessible introduction to the study of the Indo-European proto-language. It clearly sets out the methods for relating the languages to one another, presents an engaging discussion of the current debates and controversies concerning their clas- sification, and offers sample problems and suggestions for how to solve them. Complete with a comprehensive glossary, almost 100 tables in which language data and examples are clearly laid out, suggestions for further reading, discussion points and a range of exercises, this text will be an essential toolkit for all those studying historical linguistics, language typology and the Indo-European proto-language for the first time. james clackson is Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Classics, University of Cambridge, and is Fellow and Direc- tor of Studies, Jesus College, University of Cambridge. His previous books include The Linguistic Relationship between Armenian and Greek (1994) and Indo-European Word For- mation (co-edited with Birgit Anette Olson, 2004). CAMBRIDGE TEXTBOOKS IN LINGUISTICS General editors: p. austin, j. bresnan, b. comrie, s. crain, w. dressler, c. ewen, r. lass, d. lightfoot, k. rice, i. roberts, s. romaine, n. v. smith Indo-European Linguistics An Introduction In this series: j. allwood, l.-g. anderson and o.¨ dahl Logic in Linguistics d.
    [Show full text]
  • Proto-Indo-European Roots of the Vedic Aryans
    3 (2016) Miscellaneous 1: A-V Proto-Indo-European Roots of the Vedic Aryans TRAVIS D. WEBSTER Center for Traditional Vedanta, USA © 2016 Ruhr-Universität Bochum Entangled Religions 3 (2016) ISSN 2363-6696 http://dx.doi.org/10.13154/er.v3.2016.A–V Proto-Indo-European Roots of the Vedic Aryans Proto-Indo-European Roots of the Vedic Aryans TRAVIS D. WEBSTER Center for Traditional Vedanta ABSTRACT Recent archaeological evidence and the comparative method of Indo-European historical linguistics now make it possible to reconstruct the Aryan migrations into India, two separate diffusions of which merge with elements of Harappan religion in Asko Parpola’s The Roots of Hinduism: The Early Aryans and the Indus Civilization (NY: Oxford University Press, 2015). This review of Parpola’s work emphasizes the acculturation of Rigvedic and Atharvavedic traditions as represented in the depiction of Vedic rites and worship of Indra and the Aśvins (Nāsatya). After identifying archaeological cultures prior to the breakup of Proto-Indo-European linguistic unity and demarcating the two branches of the Proto-Aryan community, the role of the Vrātyas leads back to mutual encounters with the Iranian Dāsas. KEY WORDS Asko Parpola; Aryan migrations; Vedic religion; Hinduism Introduction Despite the triumph of the world-religions paradigm from the late nineteenth century onwards, the fact remains that Indologists require more precise taxonomic nomenclature to make sense of their data. Although the Vedas are widely portrayed as the ‘Hindu scriptures’ and are indeed upheld as the sole arbiter of scriptural authority among Brahmins, for instance, the Vedic hymns actually play a very minor role in contemporary Indian religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Language Revitalization in Montana: Perspectives from Four Nations
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2003 Indigenous language revitalization in Montana: Perspectives from four nations Mary Groom-Hall The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Groom-Hall, Mary, "Indigenous language revitalization in Montana: Perspectives from four nations" (2003). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 9458. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/9458 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY The University o f MONTANA Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that tin's material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports. ** Please check "Yes" or "No" and provide signature ** Yes, I grant permission ^ No, I do not grant permission _____ Author's Signature Date S)2-V o3> Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's explicit consent. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. INDIGENOUS LANGUAGE REVITALIZATION IN MONTANA PERSPECTIVES FROM FOUR NATIONS Mary Groom Hall B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Model for Indigenous Language Revival
    A Model for Indigenous Language Revival Brad Montgomery-Anderson 1. Introduction If present trends continue, the majority of Native American languages will no longer be spoken by the end of this century. The process of extinction often happens so subtly and rapidly that the community is unaware of the imminent danger of language death. A language is endangered when children no longer learn it and is dead when the last elderly speaker passes away. Faced with this irreparable loss, some communities are determined to bring back their languages. Language Revival is the creation of a living language community where such a community has ceased to exist. Over the past two decades, language revitalization has become increasingly visible to the public eye as many communities try to reverse the steady erosion of their heritage language. Linguists and language activists, however, have not paid as much attention to the idea of bringing back a language after the language has already died. The data on language endangerment indicates that many Native American languages are moving from a language revitalization scenario to a language revival scenario. It is therefore time to discuss the distinct methods and processes involved in language revival. This paper will offer such a model. In the first section, I will establish the differences between revitalization and revival, and in the second section, I will use the features unique to moribund and dead languages to outline a three-step model for reviving such languages. 23 24 Brad Montgomery-Anderson 2. Typology of Language Viability In order to determine what exactly revival means, it is first necessary to define the terms living language and dead language.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary of the History of the Caddo People
    Volume 1993 Article 25 1993 A Summary of the History of the Caddo People Frank F. Schambach Unknown Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Schambach, Frank F. (1993) "A Summary of the History of the Caddo People," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 1993, Article 25. https://doi.org/ 10.21112/.ita.1993.1.25 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol1993/iss1/25 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Summary of the History of the Caddo People Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol1993/iss1/25 Notes on Northeast Texas Archaeology, No.2 (1993) A SUMMARY OF THE HISTORY OF THE CADDO PEOPLE• by Frank F. Schambach l am pleased and very honored that you have invited me here today to tell you something about the past of the Caddo people as it is known to archaeologists.
    [Show full text]