DOCSLIB.ORG

Which Party/Parties Or Group(S)? (Multiple-Choice Possible.) The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Which Party/Parties Or Group(S)? (Multiple-Choice Possible.) The Which party/parties or group(s)? (multiple-choice possible.) The interviewer gives the interviewee a card with a list of political parties, and asks the interviewee to name the parties in the order that they had considered voting for them. Which party/parties or group(s)? (multiple-choice possible.) The interviewer gives the interviewee a card with a list of political parties, and asks the interviewee to name the parties in the order that they had considered voting for them. Which party/parties or group(s)? (multiple-choice possible.) The interviewer gives the interviewee a card with a list of political parties, and asks the interviewee to name the parties in the order that they had considered voting for them. Universe Keywords · Items · Q22D_1 - [fnes803] (IF q22c = YES) Which party/parties or group(s) (1st mention) · Q22D_2 - [fnes804] (IF q22c = YES) Which party/parties or group(s) (2nd mention) · Q22D_3 - [fnes805] (IF q22c = YES) Which party/parties or group(s) (3rd mention) · Q22D_4 - [fnes806] (IF q22c = YES) Which party/parties or group(s) (4th mention) · Q22D_5 - [fnes807] (IF q22c = YES) Which party/parties or group(s) (5th mention) · Q22D_6 - [fnes808] (IF q22c = YES) Which party/parties or group(s) (6th mention) · Q22D_7 - [fnes809] (IF q22c = YES) Which party/parties or group(s) (7th mention) · Q22D_8 - [fnes810] (IF q22c = YES) Which party/parties or group(s) (8th mention) · Q22D_9 - [fnes811] (IF q22c = YES) Which party/parties or group(s) (9th mention) · Q22D_10 - [fnes812] (IF q22c = YES) Which party/parties or group(s) (10th mention) · Q22D_11 - [fnes813] (IF q22c = YES) Which party/parties or group(s) (11th mention) · Q22D_12 - [fnes814] (IF q22c = YES) Which party/parties or group(s) (12th mention) 1 of 19 Which party/parties or group(s)? (multiple-choice possible.) The interviewer gives the interviewee a card with a list of political parties, and asks the interviewee to name the parties in the order that they had considered voting for them. · Q22D_13 - [fnes815] (IF q22c = YES) Which party/parties or group(s) (13th mention) · Q22D_14 - [fnes816] (IF q22c = YES) Which party/parties or group(s) (14th mention) · Q22D_15 - [fnes817] (IF q22c = YES) Which party/parties or group(s) (15th mention) · Q22D_16 - [fnes818] (IF q22c = YES) Which party/parties or group(s) (16th mention) Q22D_1 Label [fnes803] (IF q22c = YES) Which party/parties or group(s) (1st mention) 1 SDP (Social Democratic Party of Finland) 2 KESK (Centre Party of Finland) 3 KOK (National Coalition Party) 4 RKP (Swedish People's Party in Finland) 5 KD (Christian Democrats in Finland) 6 VIHR (Green League) 7 VAS (Left Alliance) 8 PS (True Finns) 9 The Communist Party of Finland 10 Finnish Senior Citizens' Party 11 For Peace and Socialism-Communist Workers' Party 12 The Finnish Workers' Party 13 The Independence Party 14 For the Poor 15 Pirate Party of Finland 16 Change 2011 17 Freedom Party 97 Refused to say (SPONTANEOUS) 98 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 99 Missing DDI3 Q22D_1 Pre-Question Text IF q22c = YES 2 of 19 Which party/parties or group(s)? (multiple-choice possible.) The interviewer gives the interviewee a card with a list of political parties, and asks the interviewee to name the parties in the order that they had considered voting for them. Question Text Which party/parties or group(s)? (multiple-choice possible.) The interviewer gives the interviewee a card with a list of political parties, and asks the interviewee to name the parties in the order that they had considered voting for them.: 1st mention Comparability Notes Only in FNES3. Q22D_2 Label [fnes804] (IF q22c = YES) Which party/parties or group(s) (2nd mention) 1 SDP (Social Democratic Party of Finland) 2 KESK (Centre Party of Finland) 3 KOK (National Coalition Party) 4 RKP (Swedish People's Party in Finland) 5 KD (Christian Democrats in Finland) 6 VIHR (Green League) 7 VAS (Left Alliance) 8 PS (True Finns) 9 The Communist Party of Finland 10 Finnish Senior Citizens' Party 11 For Peace and Socialism-Communist Workers' Party 12 The Finnish Workers' Party 13 The Independence Party 14 For the Poor 15 Pirate Party of Finland 16 Change 2011 17 Freedom Party 97 Refused to say (SPONTANEOUS) 98 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 99 Missing SYSMISS 3 of 19 Which party/parties or group(s)? (multiple-choice possible.) The interviewer gives the interviewee a card with a list of political parties, and asks the interviewee to name the parties in the order that they had considered voting for them. DDI3 Q22D_2 Pre-Question Text IF q22c = YES Question Text Which party/parties or group(s)? (multiple-choice possible.) The interviewer gives the interviewee a card with a list of political parties, and asks the interviewee to name the parties in the order that they had considered voting for them.: 2nd mention Comparability Notes Only in FNES3. Q22D_3 Label [fnes805] (IF q22c = YES) Which party/parties or group(s) (3rd mention) 1 SDP (Social Democratic Party of Finland) 2 KESK (Centre Party of Finland) 3 KOK (National Coalition Party) 4 RKP (Swedish People's Party in Finland) 5 KD (Christian Democrats in Finland) 6 VIHR (Green League) 7 VAS (Left Alliance) 8 PS (True Finns) 9 The Communist Party of Finland 10 Finnish Senior Citizens' Party 11 For Peace and Socialism-Communist Workers' Party 12 The Finnish Workers' Party 13 The Independence Party 14 For the Poor 15 Pirate Party of Finland 16 Change 2011 17 Freedom Party 97 Refused to say (SPONTANEOUS) 4 of 19 Which party/parties or group(s)? (multiple-choice possible.) The interviewer gives the interviewee a card with a list of political parties, and asks the interviewee to name the parties in the order that they had considered voting for them. 98 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 99 Missing SYSMISS DDI3 Q22D_3 Pre-Question Text IF q22c = YES Question Text Which party/parties or group(s)? (multiple-choice possible.) The interviewer gives the interviewee a card with a list of political parties, and asks the interviewee to name the parties in the order that they had considered voting for them.: 3rd mention Comparability Notes Only in FNES3. Q22D_4 Label [fnes806] (IF q22c = YES) Which party/parties or group(s) (4th mention) 1 SDP (Social Democratic Party of Finland) 2 KESK (Centre Party of Finland) 3 KOK (National Coalition Party) 4 RKP (Swedish People's Party in Finland) 5 KD (Christian Democrats in Finland) 6 VIHR (Green League) 7 VAS (Left Alliance) 8 PS (True Finns) 9 The Communist Party of Finland 10 Finnish Senior Citizens' Party 11 For Peace and Socialism-Communist Workers' Party 12 The Finnish Workers' Party 13 The Independence Party 14 For the Poor 15 Pirate Party of Finland 5 of 19 Which party/parties or group(s)? (multiple-choice possible.) The interviewer gives the interviewee a card with a list of political parties, and asks the interviewee to name the parties in the order that they had considered voting for them. 16 Change 2011 17 Freedom Party 97 Refused to say (SPONTANEOUS) 98 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 99 Missing SYSMISS DDI3 Q22D_4 Pre-Question Text IF q22c = YES Question Text Which party/parties or group(s)? (multiple-choice possible.) The interviewer gives the interviewee a card with a list of political parties, and asks the interviewee to name the parties in the order that they had considered voting for them.: 4th mention Comparability Notes Only in FNES3. Q22D_5 Label [fnes807] (IF q22c = YES) Which party/parties or group(s) (5th mention) 1 SDP (Social Democratic Party of Finland) 2 KESK (Centre Party of Finland) 3 KOK (National Coalition Party) 4 RKP (Swedish People's Party in Finland) 5 KD (Christian Democrats in Finland) 6 VIHR (Green League) 7 VAS (Left Alliance) 8 PS (True Finns) 9 The Communist Party of Finland 10 Finnish Senior Citizens' Party 11 For Peace and Socialism-Communist Workers' Party 12 The Finnish Workers' Party 6 of 19 Which party/parties or group(s)? (multiple-choice possible.) The interviewer gives the interviewee a card with a list of political parties, and asks the interviewee to name the parties in the order that they had considered voting for them. 13 The Independence Party 14 For the Poor 15 Pirate Party of Finland 16 Change 2011 17 Freedom Party 97 Refused to say (SPONTANEOUS) 98 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 99 Missing SYSMISS DDI3 Q22D_5 Pre-Question Text IF q22c = YES Question Text Which party/parties or group(s)? (multiple-choice possible.) The interviewer gives the interviewee a card with a list of political parties, and asks the interviewee to name the parties in the order that they had considered voting for them.: 5th mention Comparability Notes Only in FNES3. Q22D_6 Label [fnes808] (IF q22c = YES) Which party/parties or group(s) (6th mention) 1 SDP (Social Democratic Party of Finland) 2 KESK (Centre Party of Finland) 3 KOK (National Coalition Party) 4 RKP (Swedish People's Party in Finland) 5 KD (Christian Democrats in Finland) 6 VIHR (Green League) 7 VAS (Left Alliance) 8 PS (True Finns) 9 The Communist Party of Finland 7 of 19 Which party/parties or group(s)? (multiple-choice possible.) The interviewer gives the interviewee a card with a list of political parties, and asks the interviewee to name the parties in the order that they had considered voting for them. 10 Finnish Senior Citizens' Party 11 For Peace and Socialism-Communist Workers' Party 12 The Finnish Workers' Party 13 The Independence Party 14 For the Poor 15 Pirate Party of Finland 16 Change 2011 17 Freedom Party 97 Refused to say (SPONTANEOUS) 98 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 99 Missing SYSMISS DDI3 Q22D_6 Pre-Question Text IF q22c = YES Question Text Which party/parties or group(s)? (multiple-choice possible.) The interviewer gives the interviewee a card with a list of political parties, and asks the interviewee to name the parties in the order that they had considered voting for them.: 6th mention Comparability Notes Only in FNES3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parliamentary Elections 2011, Preliminary Data
    Elections 2011 Parliamentary elections 2011, preliminary data True Finns the biggest winner in the elections. Coalition Party the largest party in the Parliamentary elections 2011 Corrected on 27 April 2011. The correction is indicated in red. The True Finns emerged as the winner of the elections as the other parliamentary parties lost their support compared with the previous Parliamentary elections. The True Finns increased their support by 14.9 percentage points, thus gaining 19.0 per cent of the country's votes, which raised it from the smallest parliamentary party into the third largest party in Finland. The number of votes cast for the True Finns gave it 34 additional seats in Parliament. In total, the True Finns got 39 MPs and a total of 559,000 votes in the whole country, which is over 447,000 votes more than in the Parliamentary elections 2007. Support for parties in Parliamentary elections 2011 and 2007 The Centre Party of Finland lost most in the elections, as it dropped from the largest party to the fourth biggest party. The Centre Party gained 15.8 per cent of all the votes cast. When compared with the previous Parliamentary elections, its support went down by 7.3 percentage points. The Centre Party received 463,000 votes and 35 MPs into Parliament. The number of seats for the party fell by 16 and the number of votes by over 177,000 compared with the 2007 Parliamentary elections. Helsinki 18.4.2011 Quoting is encouraged provided Statistics Finland is acknowledged as the source. The National Coalition Party emerged as the largest party.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook Indiveu – Party Preferences
    Codebook InDivEU – party preferences European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies December 2020 Introduction The “InDivEU – party preferences” dataset provides data on the positions of more than 400 parties from 28 countries1 on questions of (differentiated) European integration. The dataset comprises a selection of party positions taken from two existing datasets: (1) The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File The EU Profiler/euandi Trend File contains party positions for three rounds of European Parliament elections (2009, 2014, and 2019). Party positions were determined in an iterative process of party self-placement and expert judgement. For more information: https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/65944 (2) The Chapel Hill Expert Survey The Chapel Hill Expert Survey contains party positions for the national elections most closely corresponding the European Parliament elections of 2009, 2014, 2019. Party positions were determined by expert judgement. For more information: https://www.chesdata.eu/ Three additional party positions, related to DI-specific questions, are included in the dataset. These positions were determined by experts involved in the 2019 edition of euandi after the elections took place. The inclusion of party positions in the “InDivEU – party preferences” is limited to the following issues: - General questions about the EU - Questions about EU policy - Questions about differentiated integration - Questions about party ideology 1 This includes all 27 member states of the European Union in 2020, plus the United Kingdom. How to Cite When using the ‘InDivEU – Party Preferences’ dataset, please cite all of the following three articles: 1. Reiljan, Andres, Frederico Ferreira da Silva, Lorenzo Cicchi, Diego Garzia, Alexander H.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Pa Erns of Legislative Collaboration In
    Network Paerns of Legislative Collaboration in Twenty Parliaments Franc¸ois Briae [email protected] Supplementary online material is appendix contains detailed information on the data and networks briey documented in the short note “Network Paerns of Legislative Collaboration in Twenty Parliaments”. Section A starts by reviewing the existing literature on legislative cosponsorship as a strategic position-taking device for legis- lators within parliamentary chambers. Section B then documents the data collection process, Section C summarises its results, and Section D contains the full list of party abbreviations used in the data. Section E fully documents how the cosponsorship networks were constructed and weighted, and lists some derived measures. e replication material for this study is available at https://github.com/ briatte/parlnet. e code was wrien in R (R Core Team, 2015), and the cur- rent release of the repository is version 2.6. See the README le of the reposi- tory for detailed replication instructions including package dependencies. e raw data up to January 2016 are available at doi:10.5281/zenodo.44440. CONTENTS A Background information on legislative cosponsorship . 2 B Sample denition and data collection . 4 B.1 Bills . 4 B.2 Sponsors . 10 C Descriptive statistics by country, chamber and legislature . 11 D Party abbreviations and Le/Right scores . 17 E Cosponsorship network construction . 27 E.1 Edge weights . 28 E.2 Network objects . 30 E.3 Network descriptors . 31 References . 35 1 A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON LEGISLATIVE COSPONSORSHIP Legislative scholarship oers a wealth of studies that stress the importance of collabo- ration between Members of Parliament (MPs) in the lawmaking process.
    [Show full text]
  • The Many Faces of Populism
    Suomen Toivo -ajatuspaja Centre for European Studies Erkka Railo • Vesa Vares THE MANY FACES OF POPULISM The True Finns through the lens of political history and the media Translation by Timo Kivistö, MA · 2 · Suomen Toivo -ajatuspaja Centre for European Studies Erkka Railo • Vesa Vares THE MANY FACES OF POPULISM The True Finns through the lens of political history and the media Translation by Timo Kivistö, MA Proofreading by James Perkins, MPsychOrg · 3 · Joint publication of the Centre for European Studies and the Suomen Toivo Think Tank. Centre for European Studies Rue du Commerce 10 Brussels, B-1000 Tel: +32-2-2854149 Fax: +32-2-2854141 www.thinkingeurope.eu Suomen Toivo Think Tank Runeberginkatu 5 B 00100 Helsinki www.toivoajatuspaja.fi This publication receives funding from the European Parliament. The Centre for European Studies and the European Parliament assume no responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in this publication and any subsequent use that may be made of the information contained therein. Sole responsibility lies on the author of the publication. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. CONTENTS Erkka Railo EMOTIONS INTO POLITICS ......................................................... 6 The Political Mobilisation of the True Finns in the Media prior to the 2011 General Election .......................................... 6 The Aim of the Essay ..................................................................................... 7 Reasons behind the True Finns’ Rise .......................................................... 11 Media Talk on EU Rescue Packages Divides Parties into Two Camps ...... 15 Social Media Offering Ways to Reach Voters ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Survey: English
    KYSELYLOMAKE: Eduskuntavaalitutkimus 2015 FRÅGEFORMULÄR: Riksdagsvalundersökningen 2015 QUESTIONNARE: Finnish National Election Study 2015 FINNISH NATIONAL ELECTION STUDY 2015 FNES 2015 Questionnaire for face-to-face interviews ADMINISTRATIVE CSES VARIABLES (Beginning with the letter A) A1. Questionnaire ID A2. Interviewer (ID for individual interviewers) A3. Interviewer gender 1. Male 2. Female A4_1. Date of the interview: month (1-12) A4_2. Date of the interview: day (1-31) A5. Original weight variables A6. Interview language (questionnaire language) 1. Finnish 2. Swedish CONTENT VARIABLES K1. How interested are you in politics? 1. Very interested 2. Somewhat interested 3. Not very interested 4. Not at all interested 96. I can't say (spontaneous) K2. How much attention did you pay to media coverage of the parliamentary elections? 1. A great deal of attention 2. A fair amount of attention 3. Only a little 4. Paid no attention at all 96. I can't say (spontaneous) K2_1 Television debates and party leader interviews K2_2 Television news and current affairs programmes K2_3 Television entertainment programmes featuring politicians K2_4 Radio programmes K2_5 Newspaper articles, columns or letters to the editor K2_6 Television advertisements K2_7 Newspaper advertisements K2_8 Web news covering elections, e.g. newspaper websites K2_9 Websites of the candidates and political parties K2_10 Blogs K2_11 Candidate selectors on the Internet K2_12 Social media, e.g. Facebook, Twitter or Instagram K2_13 Videos of the candidates or political parties on the Internet, e.g. YouTube K2_14 News broadcasts on the Internet or social media K3. How often do you use the Internet? 1. Daily, over 2 hours per day 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliament of Finland 2013
    english parliament of finland 2013 arliament convened for the first plenary session tration reform, national energy and climate strategy, the of the spring term on 4 February 2013. Eero spending limits for 2014–2017, food security in 2013–2017 P Heinäluoma (Social Democratic Party) was and EU policy in 2013, and the Future Foresight. re-elected as Speaker, Pekka Ravi (National Coalition Parliament received four Prime Minister’s announce- Party) as First Deputy Speaker and Anssi Joutsenlahti ments. These dealt with the Government’s policies (The Finns Party) as Second Deputy Speaker. in 2013 and key proposals to Parliament, the progress The opening ceremonies took place on 5 February, of the reform of social and health services, structural when President of the Republic Sauli Niinistö opened reforms and Arctic strategy. Parliament for the first time following his election in Government statements to Parliament dealt with 2012. the extension of government guarantees to support the Parliament’s opening discussion took place on 12 acquisition of funds for the European Financial Stability February on the basis of a Prime Minister’s announce- Facility and the implementation of the structural policy ment. The first part of the discussion was reserved for a programme. debate between Prime Minister Jyrki Katainen (National The opposition submitted four interpellations. Coalition Party) and opposition leaders Timo Soini (The These concerned the Government’s economic and Finns Party) and Juha Sipilä (Centre Party). The opposi- industrial policy, ensuring reasonably priced housing, tion leaders demanded answers from the Prime Minis- support for Cyprus in connection with the eurozone cri- ter concerning local government reform, the reform of sis and support for home care.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Elections 2015, Confirmed Result
    Elections 2015 Parliamentary elections 2015, confirmed result The Centre Party of Finland victorious in the Parliamentary elections 2015 Corrected on 30 April 2015 at 10:30 am. Figure 2. of the release has been corrected. The Centre Party of Finland emerged as the winner of the elections as the Social Democrats, the National Coalition Party and the Finns Party lost support compared with the previous Parliamentary elections. The Centre Party of Finland increased its support by 5.3 percentage points, thus gaining 21.1 per cent of the whole country's votes, which raised it to the largest party in Finland. The number of votes cast for the Centre Party of Finland gave it 14 additional seats in Parliament. In total, the Centre Party of Finland got 49 MPs and a total of 626,218 votes in the whole country, which is 162,952 more votes than in the Parliamentary elections 2011. Support for parties in Parliamentary elections 2015 and 2011 Helsinki 30.4.2015 Quoting is encouraged provided Statistics Finland is acknowledged as the source. The Finns Party got the second most MPs. Measured by the number of votes, the party came third. The party got 17.6 per cent of all the votes cast. When compared with the previous Parliamentary elections, its support went down by 1.4 percentage points. The party received 524,054 votes and got 38 MPs. The number of seats for the party fell by one and the number of votes by 36,021 compared with the 2011 Parliamentary elections. The National Coalition Party was the third largest party measured by the number of MPs.
    [Show full text]
  • Media and Politics in Finland
    Chapter 4 Media and politics in Finland Kim Strandberg & Tom Carlson Abstract This chapter depicts developments in Finland during the last decade regarding the interplay between the political system and the media system, both in general and in conjunction with elections. We also suggest central theoretical perspectives through which the developments in Finland can be understood. The theoretical lenses that are discussed as most relevant for the Finnish case are mediatisation and hybrid media theory. Additionally, we provide an overview of the foci and methodological developments within the field of political communication research in Finland. Essentially, as in most of the Nordic countries that this anthology addresses, all three of these areas have undergone changes in Finland during the last decade. Finally, the chapter points out future challenges for Finnish political communication research. Keywords: Finland, media, political communication, journalism, hybrid media Introduction In Finland, the most recent decade has been one of swift and rapid changes when it comes to the political landscape, the structure of the media sector, media consumption habits, journalistic practices, and political communication research. Concerning the political landscape, Finland has, like the other Nordic countries, seen a new rise of electoral support for populist parties. Starting in the 2011 parliamentary elections, the Finns Party (previously named the True Finns Party) suddenly surged in popularity and gained a strong foothold in parliament. This trend continued in the next election in 2015, and the Finns Party was included in the government for the mandate period 2015–2019, followed by a strong election in 2019 too. As we shall discuss, this has broken the long tradition of the Finnish party system being dominated by a “big three” of the Social Democratic Party, the Centre Party, and the conservative National Coalition Party (Karvonen, 2014; Karvonen et al., 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Ngos Demand Responsible Election Campaigning
    ISSUE 10 (190) • 10 – 16 MARCH 2011 • €3 • WWW.HELSINKITIMES.FI DOMESTIC BUSINESS TRAVEL LIFESTYLE CULTURE The ABC Business Turku Take Life of paper with is a snowy is work risks king walk a cabaret page 4 page 8 page 12 page 14 page 15 Saido Mohamed, Refugee Woman of the Year HELSINKI TIMES for the youth organisation Kanava MATTHEW PARRY – HT Nuoriso ry, in which adult Somalis are on call on week nights and week- THE FINNISH Refugee Council has ends in areas affected by unrest by nominated Somali-born special young Somalis. Mohamed worked nurse Saido Mohamed as Refugee with the Finnish League for Human Woman of the Year for 2011. This Rights in 2002 on the KokoNain- year the prize was awarded to a fe- en project, a preventative initiative male refugee who has performed against female circumcision. outstanding voluntary work. Saido Mohamed currently serves Saido Mohamed, 36, has vol- as the deputy chairwoman of the unteered with bodies such as the Finnish Somalia Network, and is Finnish Somali Association and car- the only woman serving on the ried out preliminary outreach work network’s board. Over the last ten years she has also cooperated on a voluntary basis with the associa- tion Sahed ry, serving as chairwom- Representatives of political parties signing the Charter of European Parties for a Non-Racist Society on 8 March. an of the board this year. “As Refugee Woman of the Year I want to continue with the volun- tary work I’ve undertaken so far. I al- so want to draw people’s attention to LEHTIKUVA / MIKKO STIG NGOs demand responsible the large number of young men and women from different walks of life who perform important, grassroots- level work with young people of dif- election campaigning ferent cultural backgrounds.
    [Show full text]
  • CSESIII Parties and Leaders Original CSES Text Plus CCNER Additions
    CSESIII Parties and Leaders Original CSES text plus CCNER additions (highlighted) =========================================================================== ))) APPENDIX I: PARTIES AND LEADERS =========================================================================== | NOTES: PARTIES AND LEADERS | | This appendix identifies parties active during a polity's | election and (where available) their leaders. | | The party labels are provided for the codes used in the | micro data variables. Parties A through F are the six | most popular parties, listed in descending order according | to their share of the popular vote in the "lowest" level | election held (i.e., wherever possible, the first segment | of the lower house). | | Leaders A through F are the corresponding party leaders or | presidential candidates referred to in the micro data items. | This appendix reports these names and party affiliations. | | Parties G, H, and I are supplemental parties and leaders | voluntarily provided by some election studies. However, | these are in no particular order. | | If parties are members of electoral blocs, the name of | the bloc is given in parentheses following the appropriate | party labels. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: AUSTRALIA (2007) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. PARTY B Liberal Party John Howard 0101 Peter Costello 02. PARTY A Australian Labor Party Kevin Rudd 0201 Julia Gillard 03. PARTY C National Party Mark Vaile 0301
    [Show full text]
  • FINLAND PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 17 April 2011
    Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights FINLAND PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 17 April 2011 OSCE/ODIHR NEEDS ASSESSMENT MISSION REPORT 25-27 January 2011 Warsaw 15 February 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................1 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................1 III. FINDINGS....................................................................................................................................3 A. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................3 B. ELECTION SYSTEM ....................................................................................................................4 C. METHODS OF VOTING ...............................................................................................................4 D. LEGAL FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................................5 E. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION ....................................................................................................6 F. VOTER AND CANDIDATE REGISTRATION .................................................................................7 1. Voter Registration ............................................................................................................... 7 2. Candidate Registration
    [Show full text]
  • Populism and Politics in the Media
    Shaping the vote? Populism and politics in the media A view from Finland, France and the Netherlands This publication is part of the project series ‘Nurturing populism? The impact of the media on the growth of populist right-wing parties in Netherlands, France and Finland’’, supported by the Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation and Stichting Democratie en Media. Translations by: Melissa Absil (Dutch), Jiska Engelbert (Dutch), Elina Eskola (Finnish) and Valantia Heracles (French). This book is available to download and re-use under a by-nc-sa Creative Commons license ported to UK law. This means that you are free to copy, distribute, display and perform the work, and make derivative works, in a non-commercial context, as long as you credit Counterpoint and the authors and share the resulting works under an equivalent license. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/ 2 Contents Introduction Lila Caballero 4 1. A battle in the middle-ground? The Finnish case Collective complicity: lessons learned by editorial offices Tuomas Muraja 8 On the Crest of the Euroscepticism Wave. The Rise of Finnish Populism from 2007 to 2011 Erkka Railo 22 2. A self-established agenda: The French case Can social experience play into the hands of the Front National? Jean-Laurent Cassely 51 National Front themes and the agenda of the French press (2006-2013) Alexandre Hobeika and Gaël Villeneuve 55 3. Politicians in the spotlight: The Dutch case Behind a collective safety net Yvonne Zonderop 89 Healthy scepticism or destructive cynicism? Media and populist sentiments in The Netherlands, 2006-2012 Jiska Engelbert & Esther Audier 94 3 Introduction Politics and the media: A marriage of convenience? By Lila Caballero Since the early stages of Counterpoint’s project ‘Recapturing Europe’s Reluctant Radicals’, we knew that the rise of populist parties is closely linked to the new role played by the media in western societies.
    [Show full text]