Manuscripts, Free Franks and Confederate Postal History
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Officers and Crew Jack L
Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar C.S.S. Alabama: An Illustrated History Library Special Collections Fall 10-10-2017 Part 2: Officers and Crew Jack L. Dickinson Marshall University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://mds.marshall.edu/css_al Part of the Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Dickinson, Jack L., "Part 2: Officers and Crew" (2017). C.S.S. Alabama: An Illustrated History. 2. http://mds.marshall.edu/css_al/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Library Special Collections at Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in C.S.S. Alabama: An Illustrated History by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. CSS Alabama : An Illustrated History In Six Parts: You are here Part 1: Building of Ship 290 ---> Part 2: Officers and Crew Part 3: Cruise of the Alabama Part 4: Battle with USS Kearsarge Part 5: Wreck Exploration & Excavation Part 6: Miscellaneous and Bibliography (the Alabama Claims, poems, music, sword of Raphael Semmes) To read any of the other parts, return to the menu and select that part to be downloaded. Designed and Assembled by Jack L. Dickinson Marshall University Special Collections 2017 1 CSS Alabama: An Illustrated History Officers and CREW OF THE CSS ALABAMA During the Civil War naval officers were divided into four categories for purposes of berthing and messing aboard ship: cabin, wardroom, steerage, and forward officers. The captain had a private state room, and higher ranking officers had small cabins, while lower ranks only had individual lockers. -
Northern Born Confederate Generals Compiled from Various Sources by Harry Hurst
Northern Born Confederate Generals Compiled from various sources by Harry Hurst Of the 425 Confederate generals commissioned during the Civil War you may find it surprising to learn that 33 were born in Northern states. New York was the leader with seven Confederate generals followed by Pennsylvania and Ohio who had six each. Massachusetts had five, New Jersey three, Maine two, and one each from Iowa, Connecticut, Indiana and Rhode Island. I did a little research to try and figure out why so many fought for the South. There were six generals that moved with their families at a very young age and were raised in the South. All served in the war as brigadier Generals. They were Charles Clark (Ohio), Robert Hopkins Hatton (Ohio), William Miller (New York), Lawrence Sullivan Ross (Iowa), Clement Hoffman Stevens (Connecticut), and William Stephen Walker (Pennsylvania). There were 15 generals that moved to the South after reaching adulthood and in essence considered themselves Southerners. Two were eventually promoted to major general. They were Samuel Gibbs French (New Jersey) and Bushrod Rust Johnson (Ohio). The other 13 were commissioned brigadier generals and they were Albert Gallatin Blanchard (Massachusetts). Julius Adolph De Lagnel (New Jersey), Johnson Kelly Duncan (Pennsylvania), Daniel Marsh Frost (New York), Archibald Gracie, Jr. (New York), Richard Griffith (Pennsylvania), Danville Leadbetter (Maine), William McComb (Pennsylvania), Edward Aylesworth Perry (Massachusetts), Albert Pike (Massachusetts), Daniel Harris Reynolds (Ohio), Claudius Wistar Sears (Massachusetts), and Zebulon York (Maine). Eight Northern born generals married Southern women and that's how they came about joining the Confederacy. That may come as a complete 1 of 2 pages Northern Born Confederate Generals Compiled from various sources by Harry Hurst surprise to most. -
“What Are Marines For?” the United States Marine Corps
“WHAT ARE MARINES FOR?” THE UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS IN THE CIVIL WAR ERA A Dissertation by MICHAEL EDWARD KRIVDO Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2011 Major Subject: History “What Are Marines For?” The United States Marine Corps in the Civil War Era Copyright 2011 Michael Edward Krivdo “WHAT ARE MARINES FOR?” THE UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS IN THE CIVIL WAR ERA A Dissertation by MICHAEL EDWARD KRIVDO Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Joseph G. Dawson, III Committee Members, R. J. Q. Adams James C. Bradford Peter J. Hugill David Vaught Head of Department, Walter L. Buenger May 2011 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT “What Are Marines For?” The United States Marine Corps in the Civil War Era. (May 2011) Michael E. Krivdo, B.A., Texas A&M University; M.A., Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Joseph G. Dawson, III This dissertation provides analysis on several areas of study related to the history of the United States Marine Corps in the Civil War Era. One element scrutinizes the efforts of Commandant Archibald Henderson to transform the Corps into a more nimble and professional organization. Henderson's initiatives are placed within the framework of the several fundamental changes that the U.S. Navy was undergoing as it worked to experiment with, acquire, and incorporate new naval technologies into its own operational concept. -
Trench Warfare
Aaron Berman, Will Ryan, and Jim Wald Trench Warfare A Comparative Analysis of Civil War and World War I Trenches Lauren Fraser 4/30/2013 Page | 1 Table of Contents Chapter 1: “A Soldier’s Life for Me”…Life in the Trenches ....................................... 7 Chapter 2: The Building of the Trenches ....... 32 Chapter 3: European Observations and the Trenches of WWI ............................... 55 Conclusion: ................................... 79 Bibliography .................................. 85 Page | 2 Trench Warfare A Comparative Analysis of Civil War and World War I Trenches Intro: Trench warfare, or occasionally “siege warfare”, is often defined as a form of “occupied fighting lines” in which soldiers are protected by field works from an opposing front’s artillery and small-arms fire. One tends to picture trench warfare as two large armies bogged down due to heavy artillery and unable to do more than move gradually inch by inch across a battlefield; or of men leaping out of trenches to dash headlong into immense fire and certain death. Sometimes considered representative of futility in war, trench warfare has become synonymous with stalemates in the midst of conflict, of the wearing down of enemy forces until they are unable to continue from lack of arms or morale, and of a form of warfare that is nothing more than senseless slaughter in less-than-stellar environments. Trench warfare is so often associated with World War I because its usage was such a prominent characteristic. Tactically and strategically, the use of trenches for defensive purposes was not particularly new by 1914. Field fortifications – forts, strongholds, and even trenches – have Page | 3 been in sporadic usage throughout warfare as far back as the Romans, although not to the same extent as during the First World War. -
Maritime Reporter and Engineering News
MARITIME REPORTER AND ENGINEERING NEWS SiEST COAST SHIPYARDS The Maritime Prepositioning lip, Pfc Eugene A. Obregon, Built By Notional Steel & Shipbuilding U.S. Navy Ship Overhaul Market JULY 16, 1985 - An Update - (SEE PAGE 4) INTRODUCING THE EPOCH MARK D SERIES A new era in product oil carrier design. Hitachi Zosen has developed the EPOCH MARK n series which has a unique structure not found on conventional ship designs. Revolutionary in concept, the MARKII incorporates a unidirectional girder system combined with a complete double hull structure. While a ship's hull is customarily designed with a grillage of longitudinal and transverse members for strength, this system uses only longitudinal members in a double hull to provide sufficient strength. This unidirectional girder system results in unprecedented structural simplicity and completely flush surfaced cargo tank interior. MARKII product oil carriers provide unrivaled advantages in performances over more conventional designs. The EPOCH MARK n series is available in 40, 60 and 80 thousands dwt designs. And has won the approval of leading classification societies (ABS, BV, LR, NK, NV). At present The Superior Performance of the EPOCH MARK n Series: many worldwide patents are under application. Conventional EPOCH MARK Hitachi Zosen is also expanding this new structural system for the development of combination cargo carriers such as PROBO or Tank configuration OBO carriers other than oil tankers. Cargo/ballast segregation * kkk unloading time * •kkk Unloading efficiency stripping * kkk cleaning time * kkk Cargo tank cleaning completeness • kkk f" s:3 cargo tank * kkk Gas free 6 ballast tank ** ** 11 - Cargo tank heating * kkk Cargo purity * kkk cargo tank coating k kkk Maintenance ballast tank coating ** kk hull construction * kkk crack free ** kkk Safety stranding & collision * *** Excellent ** Good * Normal We build industries Hitachi Zosen HITACHI ZOSEN CORPORATION HITACHI ZOSEN INTERNATIONAL, S.A.: London: Winchester House, 77 London Wall. -
West Virginia and Regional History Collection Newsletter Twenty-Year Index, Volume 1-Volume 20, Spring 1985-Spring 2005 Anna M
West Virginia & Regional History Center University Libraries Newsletters 2012 West Virginia and Regional History Collection Newsletter Twenty-Year Index, Volume 1-Volume 20, Spring 1985-Spring 2005 Anna M. Schein Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvrhc-newsletters Part of the History Commons West Virginia and Regional History Collection Newsletter Twenty-Year Index Volume 1-Volume 20 Spring 1985-Spring 2005 Compiled by Anna M. Schein Morgantown, WV West Virginia and Regional History Collection West Virginia University Libraries 2012 1 Compiler’s Notes: Scope Note: This index includes articles and photographs only; listings of WVRHC staff, WVU Libraries Visiting Committee members, and selected new accessions have not been indexed. Publication and numbering notes: Vol. 12-v. 13, no. 1 not published. Issues for summer 1985 and fall 1985 lack volume numbering and are called: no. 2 and no.3 respectively. Citation Key: The volume designation ,“v.”, and the issue designation, “no.”, which appear on each issue of the Newsletter have been omitted from the index. 5:2(1989:summer)9 For issues which have a volume number and an issue number, the volume number appears to left of colon; the issue number appears to right of colon; the date of the issue appears in parentheses with the year separated from the season by a colon); the issue page number(s) appear to the right of the date of the issue. 2(1985:summer)1 For issues which lack volume numbering, the issue number appears alone to the left of the date of the issue. Abbreviations: COMER= College of Mineral and Energy Resources, West Virginia University HRS=Historical Records Survey US=United States WV=West Virginia WVRHC=West Virginia and Regional History Collection, West Virginia University Libraries WVU=West Virginia University 2 West Virginia and Regional History Collection Newsletter Index Volume 1-Volume 20 Spring 1985-Spring 2005 Compiled by Anna M. -
The Navy in the Civil
The Navies of the Civil War Overview Anderson, Bern. By Sea and by River: the Naval History of the Civil War. New York: Knopf, 1962. F834 A545b Hearn, Chester G. Naval battles of the Civil War. San Diego: Thunder Bay Press, 2000. UN834 H436n 2000 Oversized Material Porter, David D. The Naval History of the Civil War. New York: Sherman Publishing Co., 1886. F834 P84n Union Joiner, Gary D. Mr. Lincoln’s Brown Water Navy: the Mississippi Squadron. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2007. UN834 J74m Merrill, James M. The Rebel Shore: the Story of Union Sea Power in the Civil War. Boston: Little, Brown, 1957. F834 M571r Taaffe, Stephen R. Commanding Lincoln's Navy: Union Naval Leadership During the Civil War. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press, 2009. UN834 T111c Confederacy Campbell, R. Thomas, editor. Voices of the Confederate Navy: Articles, Letters, Reports, and Reminiscences. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company, 2008. UN861 V889 Hearn, Chester G. Gray Raiders of the Sea: How Eight Confederate Warships Destroyed the Union's High Seas Commerce. Camden, Maine: International Marine Publishing, 1992. F834z H436g Scharf, J. Thomas. History of Confederate States Navy from Its Organization to the Surrender of Its Last Vessel. Albany, New York: Joseph McDonough, 1894. F834z S31h 1894 Gunboats Walke, Henry. Naval Scenes on the Western Waters. The gunboats Taylor, Carondelet and Lafayette. [S.l., 187-?] F8347 N318 Gosnell, Harpur Allen. Guns on the Western Waters: the Story of River Gunboats in the Civil War. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, [1949]. F834 G677g Joyner, Elizabeth Hoxie. The USS Cairo: History and Artifacts of a Civil War Gunboat. -
Battle of Mcdowell Scenario Map with Extension
EXPANDED SCENARIO map on page 21 in RFF Civil War Battle Scenarios Vol. 2, 1862-1863 to form a contiguous battlefield. Terrain should be laid out as shown. With two exceptions, terrain effects are the BATTLE OF same as in the basic scenario. Elevations and Valley. The north end of Sittlington Hill overlooks a valley through which the turnpike passes. A two- MCDOWELL level elevation called Hull’s Hill, spans the table edge north of May 8, 1862 the road. Some areas in the valley are open terrain. Road. The Staunton-Parkersburg Turnpike is in good condi- tion. Units in march column, limbered guns, and leaders on the road may move at the road movement rate. The Scenario Order of Battle One Union regiment and gun section, and one Confederate Historically, the Union 3rd West Virginia and Confederate regiment are added to the order of battle when using the map 31st Virginia, both guarding the turnpike in the valley north extension. of Sittlington Hill, were only lightly engaged until both units were ordered up onto the hilltop. We determined after playtest- The following number of additional stands are needed. The ing, that the area encompassing the valley and adjacent Hull number in parenthasis is the grand total from the combined Hill were superfluous to recreating the historical scenario. scenarios. Players who prefer a larger gaming area can add the 2-ft. map STAND UNION CONFEDERATE extension to the north table edge. The extension increases the gaming area to 8-ft. wide by 5-ft. deep in 15mm. Infantry 12 (69) 9 (113) Infantry command 1 (7) 1 (10) Terrain Artillery (gun with limber) 1 (1) 0 (0) Connect the map extension to the north edge of the scenario 1 1 pt Battle of McDowell Scenario Map with Extension N Johnson E W 8” and on a S 2-level elevation, C on turn 4. -
May 2020 Volume 2 Issue 5
The Runner MAY 2020 VOLUME 2 ISSUE 5 The McLehany Brothers in the 46th Mississippi Infantry by Sherry Hewitt Our May 14th meeting fea- This is the story of my relatives who fought in the 46th Mississippi Infantry turing Douglas Waller has during the Civil War. John M. McLehany and his wife, Betsy, settled in Simp- been canceled due to the son County, Mississippi around 1825. Three of their sons were William (1827), Rowland (1838), and James (1842). They were my great-great- Coronavirus pandemic. grandmother’s brothers. William (35), Rowland (24), and James (20) enlisted in the 46th Missis- sippi Infantry, Company H. 6th Mississippi Infantry (Balfour’s) Companies A-E assembled at Meridian in April, 1862, and the battalion com- posed of five companies was organized April 19th. J. W. Balfour, was elected commanding officer, and J. W. Jones, Company E, as Major. On May 18 the battalion was ordered to Vicksburg, where it was on duty at Smede’s Point during the bombardment of May 10 to July 27, 1862, under the command of Gen. M. L. Smith, who had charge of the river defenses. The battalion suf- fered much from sickness and want of drinking water, and many died. The returns of July showed 17 officers and 161 men present for duty. Rowland McLehany enlisted April 4, 1862. 46th Mississippi Infantry Regiment was organized during the fall of 1862 by adding five companies to the five-company 6th (Balfour’s) Mississippi Infan- try Battalion. In February, 1863, it totaled 407 effectives and served in S.D. -
The Engineers at Camp Parapet
The Engineers at Camp Parapet The summer of 1861 found New Orleans defended from an attack and invasion by a Federal navy from the Gulf of Mexico and lower Mississippi River by the massive fortifications of Forts Jackson and St Phillip, fifty miles below the city. With this approach considered safe from a Yankee assault, the citizens of New Orleans turned their eyes to what they believed the most likely direction of an attack.... by United States gunboats coming down the Mississippi River from St Louis and beyond. To protect New Orleans, the city’s Committee of defense determined to construct fortifications upriver from New Orleans. The proposed site was adjacent to Carrollton, Louisiana, which was at that time the seat of government for Jefferson Parish. Entrusted with the responsibility for designing the fortifications was Benjamin Buisson. Pierre Benjamin Buisson was born May 20, 1793 in Paris, France. His father Claude Buisson was a soldier in the French Army. He graduated from the L’Ecole Polytechnique military academy of Paris in 1813, received further education at the fortress of Metz, and served in the Sixth Artillery of Napoleon’s Grande Armee. For his services in the emperor’s army, he was awarded the Legion of Honor in 1815. Buisson immigrated to New Orleans in 1817, and soon became prominent as a civil engineer and architect, laying out Lafayette Cemetery and many of the streets in New Orleans as well as a new Customs House for the city. From 1832 until 1855, he served as principal surveyor for Jefferson Parish. He also joined the Orleans Battalion of Artillery in1824, and eventually rose to the commanding rank of Major. -
An Investigation Into British Neutrality During the American Civil War 1861-65
AN INVESTIGATION INTO BRITISH NEUTRALITY DURING THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR 1861-65 BY REBECCA CHRISTINE ROBERTS-GAWEN A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of MA by Research Department of History University of Birmingham November 2015 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This thesis sought to investigate why the British retained their policy of neutrality throughout the American Civil War, 1861-65, and whether the lack of intervention suggested British apathy towards the conflict. It discovered that British intervention was possible in a number of instances, such as the Trent Affair of 1861, but deliberately obstructed Federal diplomacy, such as the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863. This thesis suggests that the British public lacked substantial and sustained support for intervention. Some studies have suggested that the Union Blockade of Southern ports may have tempted British intervention. This thesis demonstrates how the British sought and implemented replacement cotton to support the British textile industry. This study also demonstrates that, by the outbreak of the Civil War, British society lacked substantial support for foreign abolitionists’’ campaigns, thus making American slavery a poorly supported reason for intervention. -
Cracking the Stonewall Norman Simms La Salle University
The Histories Volume 5 | Issue 2 Article 4 Cracking the Stonewall Norman Simms La Salle University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/the_histories Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Simms, Norman () "Cracking the Stonewall," The Histories: Vol. 5 : Iss. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/the_histories/vol5/iss2/4 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Scholarship at La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The iH stories by an authorized editor of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Histories, Volume 5, Number 2 16 The Lost Cause Mythology contains great “What if..." questions; of these, one of the greatest is what would have happened if General Thomas (Stonewall) J. Jackson had not been killed so early on in the Civil War. Jackson was a disciplined and aggressive commander but as with all mythology, the facts have been exaggerated. Three discrepancies exist that portray Jackson as a good general but not the iconic figure found in most historical accounts. Jackson’s tendency towards secrecy prevented him from sharing his plans and intentions with subordinates, fellow commanders, and superiors. His stubborn nature was problematic, and resulted in a constant stream of courts-martial, which he was almost too willing to use against other officers, as well as in general discord, even amongst his most senior officers. He has been deemed a military genius, but he was only a genius as compared to the Union commanders that he faced in battle.