DOCSLIB.ORG

Protecting and Restoring the Waters of Dungeness

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Protecting and Restoring the Waters of Dungeness Protecting and Restoring the Waters of the Dungeness A Watershed-Based Plan Prepared in Compliance with Section 319 of the Clean Water Act Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe Sequim, WA July 2007 S’Klallam ancestor Lizzy Fleming & friend on the Dungeness River in 1919. Jamestown Tribal Photo Archives Protecting and Restoring the Waters of the Dungeness A Watershed-Based Plan Prepared in Compliance with Section 319 of the Clean Water Act Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe Sequim, WA July, 2007 This report should be cited as: Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe, 2007. Protecting and restoring the waters of the Dungeness, CWA 319 Plan. Sequim, WA. Report available from: Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe, Natural Resources Department 1033 Old Blyn Highway; Sequim, WA 98382 Report prepared by: Ann Seiter Technical Writing and Editing Lyn Muench, Environmental Program Manager, Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe Hansi Hals, Restoration Planner, Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe Pam Edens, GIS Specialist, Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe The preparers would like to thank the contributions of data and reports from the U.S. Forest Service Quilcene Ranger District, Shreffler Environmental, and the Clallam Conservation District during the preparation of this document. Map Acknowledgements: Unless otherwise noted, map diagrams in this document were produced using the Jamestown S’Klallam Tribal GIS with data from the following sources: • Irrigation Ditches - Montgomery Water Group – 1998 • Roads/Urban Growth Areas/Parcels/Forest cover/Septics/LIDAR – Clallam County 2006 • Streams – WA Dept. of Fish & Wildlife SSHIAP 2007 • Watershed boundary – WA Dept. of Ecology 2004 • Shellfish areas - WA Dept. of Health • Major Riparian structures in the Dungeness - U.S. Bureau of Reclamation July 2007 Clean Water Act 319 Plan - Dungeness Watershed Protecting and Restoring the Waters of the Dungeness A Watershed-Based Plan Prepared in Compliance with Section 319 of the Clean Water Act Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe Sequim, WA JULY 2007 INTRODUCTION: Purpose and Scope . 1 1. Overview of the Dungeness Watershed area . 4 2. Watershed Community Collaboration: History of Watershed Planning in the Dungeness (1986-2007) 2.1 Dungeness River Management Team . 7 2.2 Previous Major Watershed Plans . 10 2.3 Jamestown S’Klallam Tribal Comprehensive Plan . 12 3.* Causes and Sources of Non-Point Source Pollution; by NPS Category* 3.0 Introduction . 13 3.1 Forestry . 18 3.2 Agriculture . 24 3.3 Hydromodification/ Habitat Alteration . 27 3.4 Marinas and Boating . 46 3.5 Roads, Highways and Bridges . 47 3.6 Urbanization . 48 3.7 Wetland/ Riparian Management . 59 3.8 Other Sources . 61 4.* Summary of Watershed Goals 4.1 Broad Watershed Goals . 62 4.2* Quantitative Watershed Goals and Planning Targets . 64 5.* NPS Management Measures (by Tribal Sub-Goal) 5.0 Introduction . 72 5.1 Water Quality Cleanup Plans . 76 5.2 Water Conservation . 79 5.3 Dungeness Salmon Recovery Planning . 84 5.4 Regional Land & Watershed Management Plans . 88 5.5 Tribal Land and Water Management . 93 * Required elements marked with * Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe i July 2007 Clean Water Act 319 Plan - Dungeness Watershed 6.* Information and Education . 101 6.1 Summary of Watershed Education and Outreach 6.2 Dungeness River Audubon Center 7.* Cost Estimates and Sources of Funding . 105 7.1 Cost Estimates of Identified NPS Management Measures 7.2 Current and Future Needs 8.* Watershed Milestones* and Schedule for Implementation* . 111 9.* Criteria for Evaluating Progress . 122 10.* Monitoring and Adaptive Management . 124 APPENDICES A. Plans, Studies and Projects in the Dungeness Watershed Area 1989-2006 . 131 B. Additional References . 139 C. Salmon Recovery 3-year Project List (2005 update) . 141 D. Environmental Program Goals and Objectives FY 2007-2009: Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe . 143 Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe ii July 2007 Clean Water Act 319 Plan - Dungeness Watershed FIGURES AND TABLES Introduction Figure i-1: Location Map Figure i-2: Planning Area Map Section 1: Watershed Overview Figure 1-1: Land Cover 1854 and 1994 (P. Eckert) Section 2: History of Watershed Planning Figure 2-1: Issues and Activities of the Dungeness River Management Team Section 3: Causes and Sources of NPS Pollution Table 3-1: List of impaired water bodies in the Dungeness Watershed Area Figure 3-1 Shellfish harvest closure dates in Dungeness Bay Figure 3-2: Marine waters and shellfish harvest classifications of the Dungeness watershed area Figure 3-3: Federal, state and commercial timberlands Table 3-2: Mass wasting events in the Dungeness Watershed analysis area by subwatershed (US Forest Service) Table 3-3: All erosion features by erosion process type and land use or land condition (USFS) Table 3-4: Length and density of USDA Forest Service roads in the Dungeness Watershed, by subwatershed (USFS) Figure 3-4: Aquatic risk rating in the upper Dungeness Watershed (USFS) Figure 3-5: Dungeness Irrigation System Table 3-5: Results of Dungeness Area Farm Inventory by the Clallam Conservation District Figure 3-6: Comparison of Dungeness water withdrawals in September 1987 and 2001 Figure 3-7: Temperature and flow data for the Dawley Side Channel (Bureau of Reclamation) Figure 3-8: Critical Aquifer Recharge Map (Clallam County) Table 3-6: Number of existing wells and depths by subbasin in the Dungeness Watershed area. Figure 3-9: Density of exempt wells in the Dungeness Area (WA Dept. of Ecology) Figure 3-10: Class A water systems in eastern Clallam County (Clallam County DCD) Figure 3-11: Changes in stream channel morphology from 1994 to 2000 near the Dungeness Meadows dike at RM 8 (Johnson/BOR) Figure 3-12: Major riparian structures along the Dungeness River Table 3-7: Major levees in the Dungeness River Table 3-8: Dungeness River reaches without riparian vegetation in 2003 Figure 3-13: Channel locations of the river mouth at selected years between 1855 and 2003 (Collins/UW) Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe iii July 2007 Clean Water Act 319 Plan - Dungeness Watershed Figure 3-14: Shoreline development near the mouths of Meadowbrook Creek and Cooper Creek (PNPTC photos) Table 3-9: Water Temperature Data at 6 monitoring sites for Siebert Creek in 2003 Table 3-10: Bridges along the lower Dungeness River Figure 3-15: Urban Growth Area Boundaries Table 3-11: Existing and Potential Buildout of Residential Units in the Dungeness Watershed Area by Subbasin Figure 3-16: Buildout map of Eastern Clallam County Figure 3-17: Sources of Nitrates in the Dungeness Watershed Area Figure 3-18: Map of septic systems of concern -- set of 2 Figure 3-19: Map of golf courses in the Dungeness watershed Figure 3-20: Map of impervious surfaces in the Dungeness watershed (Ecology) Figure 3-21: Dungeness River Knotweed Project 2006 Section 4: Goals Table 4-1: Washington State Water Quality Criteria for Fecal Coliform Bacteria Table 4-2: Fecal coliform target reductions and concentrations for tributaries to Dungeness Bay Table 4-3: Fecal coliform target reductions and concentrations for Dungeness River and Tributaries Table 4-4: Fecal coliform loading reductions necessary to meet water quality standards for Dungeness Bay marine sites and the Dungeness River during the critical period Table 4-5: Fecal coliform reductions to meet Class AA freshwater standards for the ditches to the inner Bay, October 2001 - September 2002 Table 4-6: Recommended Instream Flow Levels for Dungeness Planning Area streams Figure 4-1: Dungeness River mean half-monthly flows, recommended IFIM instream flows, and additional target flows. Table 4-7: Dungeness Chinook Escapement Planning Targets in Comparison with Mean Escapement 1987-2001 Section 5: NPS Management Measures Table 5-1: Summary of Management Measures by NPS Categories/Sub-Categories Table 5-2: Summary of NPS Management Measures in the Clean Water Strategy and Detailed Implementation Plan Table 5-3: Water Rights and Claims on the Dungeness River Table 5-4: Potential Pollutant Loading Sources, Activities, and Management Measures Described in the Comprehensive Irrigation District Management Plan Figure 5-1: Chinook redds in the Dungeness River 2004-2006 Table 5-5: Key Restoration Opportunities—Slab Camp Creek Subwatershed Figure 5-2: Tribal properties in the Dungeness Watershed Area Figure 5-3: Tribal property at Rivers End Road Figure 5-4: Tribal property at Railroad Bridge Park Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe iv July 2007 Clean Water Act 319 Plan - Dungeness Watershed Section 7: Cost Estimates Table 7-1: Summary of estimated costs for implementing five tribal goals Section 8: Milestones for Implementation Table 8-1: Milestones and Measures for Implementation and Criteria for Evaluating Progress for implementing Tribal Goals Section 10: Monitoring and Adaptive Management Table 10-1 Summary of Dungeness Watershed Area Monitoring Activities Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe v July 2007 Clean Water Act 319 Plan - Dungeness Watershed Figure i-1: General Location of the Dungeness Watershed, Washington State Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe vi July 2007 Clean Water Act 319 Plan - Dungeness Watershed INTRODUCTION: Purpose and Scope Located on the north coast of the Olympic Peninsula (Figure i-1), the Dungeness watershed has always been the home of the Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe, providing abundant resources from its forests, rivers, tidelands and marine waters. Following early white settlement, the Dungeness band of S’Klallams pooled $500 in gold coin in 1874 to purchase 200 acres of land along Dungeness Bay, to remain in their ancestral homeland and avoid moving to a reservation. They named their community after their leader known as Lord James Balch. Today many citizens of the Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe still reside in the Dungeness watershed. The Tribe owns riparian property along the Dungeness River at three locations from the river mouth to river mile 7, and a small tideland area in Dungeness Bay. Tribal citizens harvest fish and shellfish from Dungeness Bay for ceremonial, subsistence and commercial purposes. Waters originating in the upper Dungeness watershed and associated tributaries, and estuarine/marine waters along the Strait of Juan de Fuca directly affect these tribal lands and waters, and are the subject of this plan.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dungeness River Targeted Watershed Initiative FINAL REPORT
    Dungeness River Targeted Watershed Initiative FINAL REPORT For E.P.A. Targeted Watershed Grant WS‐97098101‐0 Prepared By: Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe December 2009 FIGURES Figure 1. Dungeness Watershed on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington. ................................. 4 Figure 2. Dungeness Bay shellfish closure areas. ........................................................................ 6 Figure 3. Phase 1 MST (Ribotyping) sampling locations.............................................................. 9 Figure 4. Phase 2 MST (Bacteroides Target Specific PCR) sampling locations. ......................... 10 Figure 5. Mycoremediation Demonstration Site. ...................................................................... 11 Figure 6. Construction of Mycoremediation Demonstration Site............................................. 12 Figure 7. Schematic of Biofilitration Cells, with native plants and fungi in the Treatment cell and native plants only in the Control. Inflow water is split with equal volumes and fed to the two cells (not to scale). ........................................................ 13 Figure 8. Ground‐breaking excavation at the rain garden site, Helen Haller Elementary School, Sequim, WA.................................................................................................... 15 Figure 9. TWG fresh water monitoring stations and DOH marine monitoring stations. .......... 18 Figure 10. Fecal Coliform Concentration (CFU/100 ml) over 6‐Month Time Period (mean +/‐ standard deviation)...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Delineation of the Dungeness River Channel Migration Zone
    Delineation of the Dungeness River Channel Migration Zone River Mouth to Canyon Creek Byron Rot Pam Edens Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe October 1, 2008 Acknowledgements This report was greatly improved from comments given by Patricia Olson, Department of Ecology, Tim Abbe, Entrix Corp, Joel Freudenthal, Yakima County Public Works, Bob Martin, Clallam County Emergency Services, and Randy Johnson, Jamestown S'Klallam Tribe. This project was not directly funded as a specific grant, but as one of many tribal tasks through the federal Pacific Coastal Salmon fund. We thank the federal government for their support of salmon recovery. Cover: Roof of house from Kinkade Island in January 2002 flood (Reach 6), large CMZ between Hwy 101 and RR Bridge (Reach 4, April 2007), and Dungeness River Channel Migration Zone map, Reach 6. ii Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………….1 Legal requirement for CMZ’s……………………………………….1 Terminology used in this report……………………………………..2 Geologic setting…………………………………………………......4 Dungeness flooding history…………………………………………5 Data sources………………………………………………………....6 Sources of error and report limitations……………………………...7 Geomorphic reach delineation………………………………………8 CMZ delineation methods and results………………………………8 CMZ description by geomorphic reach…………………………….12 Conclusion………………………………………………………….18 Literature cited……………………………………………………...19 iii Introduction The Dungeness River flows north 30 miles and drops 3800 feet from the Olympic Mountains to the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The upper watershed south of river mile (RM) 10 lies entirely within private and state timberlands, federal national forests, and the Olympic National Park. Development is concentrated along the lower 10 miles, where the river flows through relatively steep (i.e. gradients up to 1%), glacial and glaciomarine deposits (Drost 1983, BOR 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Land and Resource Management Plan
    United States Department of Land and Resource Agriculture Forest Service Management Plan Pacific Northwest Region 1990 Olympic National Forest I,,; ;\'0:/' "\l . -'. \.. \:~JK~~'.,;"> .. ,. :~i;/i- t~:.(~#;~.. ,':!.\ ," "'~.' , .~, " ,.. LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN for the OLYMPIC NATIONAL FOREST PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION PREFACE Preparation of a Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan) for the Olympic National Forest is required by the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act (RPA) as amended by the National Forest Management Act (NFMA). Regulations developed under the RPA establish a process for developing, adopting, and revising land and resource Plans for the National Forest System (36 CFR 219). The Plan has also been developed in accordance with regulations (40 CFR 1500) for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). Because this Plan is considered a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, a detailed statement (environmental impact statement) has been prepared as required by NEPA. The Forest Plan represents the implementation of the Preferred Alternative as identified in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Forest Plan. If any particular provision of this Forest Plan, or application of the action to any person or circumstances is found to be invalid, the remainder of this Forest Plan and the application of that provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected. Information concerning this plan can be obtained
    [Show full text]
  • Harlequin Happenings
    HARLEQUIN HAPPENINGS Newsletter of the Olympic Peninsula Audubon Society (OPAS) Www.olympicpeninsulaaudubon.org (www.olybird.org) Clallam County, Washington A Chapter of the National Audubon Society Issue 1 Jan-Feb 2017 Promoting Birding and Conservation as Community Educators, Volunteers, and Stewards OPAS Programs for January and February by Bob Boekelheide January 18, 2017, 7 p.m. at the Dungeness River Audubon Center, “The Natural World Always has a Story to Share - Celebrating What is Right with the World!” Presented by Alan Bauer. Alan Bauer is a profes- sional photographer, specializing in the natu- ral history of the Pacific Northwest. His excellent photographs have ap- peared in numerous Sooty Grouse magazines, newspa- Photo by Alan Bauer pers, books, and even in a special exhibit about spiders at Wood- February 15, 2017, 7 p.m. at the Dungeness River Audubon Center , "OPAS Member Photo Night 2017", land Park Zoo in Seat- tle. As Alan says, “The Organized by Dow Lambert. greatest value of my Time for our annual members' photo show! Do you have photographic art is to photos of birds you would like to share with others? better educate people Lucky for you, because other OPAS members want to about the beauty sur- see them, too. Alan Bauer rounding us.” Please submit your digital photos to Dow Lambert, who Celebrate what is right has generously offered to assist us projecting the imag- with the world! Sometimes we need to slow down, look es. If you wish to offer your photos for the evening, more closely, and appreciate beauty right around us.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Processes, Human Impacts, and Restoration Issues of the Lower Dungeness River
    PHYSICAL PROCESSES, HUMAN IMPACTS, AND RESTORATION ISSUES OF THE LOWER DUNGENESS RIVER Clallam County, Washington Prepared for Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe by the U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation May 2002 United States Department of the Interior The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to tribes. Bureau of Reclamation The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Physical Processes, Human Impacts, and Restoration Issues of the Lower Dungeness River Clallam County, Washington Report Prepared By U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation TECHNICAL SERVICE CENTER Denver, Colorado Water Resources Services Division Sedimentation & River Hydraulics Group Jennifer A. Bountry, Hydraulic Engineer Timothy J. Randle, Hydraulic Engineer and Geotechnical Division Seismotectonics and Geophysics Group Lucille A. Piety, Geologist AND PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGIONAL OFFICE Boise, Idaho Resource & Technical Services Geology, Exploration, and Instrumentation Group Richard A. Link, Regional Geologist List of Peer Reviewers The following Bureau of Reclamation personnel peer reviewed this document. Dr. Daniel Levish, Geologist Flood Hydrology Group Technical Service Center, Denver, Colorado Dr. Jianchun Huang, Hydraulic Engineer Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group
    [Show full text]
  • PIONEER DAYS at OLD DUNGENESS* the History As
    PIONEER DAYS AT OLD DUNGENESS* The history as related dates back to the time when Captain Vancouver, a navigator and explorer, named Dungeness- "New Dungeness" -because. of the similarity to a harbor on the southern coast of England of that name. It is not generally known that Port Angeles was named False Dungeness, because of a similar sand spit which encloses its harbor, until a Spanish navigator was driven into the harbor for refuge from a fierce gale and so it derived its name- "The Port of the Angeles" -later being officially named Port Angeles. In the vicinity of Dungeness as the earliest settlers found it in 1852, there was a heavy growth of fir and cedar timber, some of which stood as late as 1914, when it was logged off by the Dungeness Logging Co., operated by N. 1. Peterson, although the lowlands near the Straits of Juan de Fuca and Puget Sound have always been fringed, with willows, alder, maple and under brush not of high value for lumber purposes. .Puget Sound derived its name from a man named Puget, a member of the crew of Captain Vancouver's ship. In 1852 the settlement of Dungeness was located on what was called Whisky Flats, at the mouth of the Dungeness River. Indians in strong tribes peopled the beaches, their village being on the sand­ spit later known as Clines Spit. Their dead were buried in shallow graves on top of the ground similar to the mounds of the Dakotas. A few were buried near the edge of the high bluff near the Mc­ Almond and Abernathy homesteads and relics of these inhabitants are often, turned up by the plow, since that soil has been put to use for farming purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Dungeness River Olympic National Forest
    Middle Dungeness River Subwatershed Restoration Action Plan Hood Canal Ranger District, Olympic National Forest USDA Forest Service Watershed Condition Framework FY2012 WATERSHED RESTORATION ACTION PLAN Middle Dungeness River Olympic National Forest Summary Watershed Name and HUC Middle Dungeness River, 171100200306 General Location The Middle Dungeness River watershed is part of the larger Dungeness Watershed and is located near Sequim, Washington. The Olympic National Forest boundary is approximately 8 miles south of Sequim, on the Olympic Peninsula. Other nearby towns includes Port Angeles and Port Townsend. The Middle Dungeness River watershed drains into the Dungeness River, which flows north 10.8 miles from the forest boundary into the Strait of Juan de Fuca and the greater Puget Sound basin. Other fish-bearing streams that are within the Middle Dungeness watershed include Rock, Canyon, Pats, and Caraco Creeks. Middle Dungeness Watershed Restoration Action Plan Hood Canal Ranger District, Olympic National Forest Total Watershed Area Total Acres: 18,664 National Forest area within watershed: 45 percent Watershed Characterization General Physiography The Middle Dungeness 6th field watershed is part of the larger Dungeness River watershed. It originates in the moderate relief glaciated lower portion of the Olympic Mountains, with elevations reaching from 5200 feet in the southwest corner within the Buckhorn Wilderness to 300 feet along the Dungeness River near State Highway 101. The southern boundary of the watershed follows an elevation ranging from 3000 to 3500 feet, and the elevation at the forest boundary is approximately 1200 feet. It encompasses the mainstem Dungeness River from the confluence of the Gray Wolf River downstream to well below the National Forest boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.1 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Olympic Peninsula Landscapes, And
    Chapter 2.1 Natural Environment Page 2.1-1 2.1 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Olympic Peninsula landscapes, and the region’s flora and fauna, have been shaped by the geology and climatic history of the region. The landscapes have been reworked by the persistent, long-term action of gradual environmental changes such as glaciation and mountain-building. They have responded to erratic, catastrophic events, such as major floods, fires, and the breaching of glacial lakes. And they evidence the pervasive effects of human influences. The wildlife and plantlife of the peninsula reflect this long, complex, and significantly altered character. This section discusses the many factors that define the current condition of the natural environment of WRIA 18. This is a diverse area with important differences across its full extent. Consequently, the discussion below contains some information that is generally applicable to the entire planning area. In addition, much work has been done in specific areas within WRIA 18 that makes it possible to present more detailed information relating to portions of the WRIA, especially in distinguishing between East WRIA 18 and West WRIA 18. Where possible and appropriate, information here is presented separately for these eastern and western portions. 2.1.1 Geography West WRIA 18 – Elwha Morse Planning Area West WRIA 18 (WRIA 18W) includes, on the west, the Elwha River and its tributaries, Morse Creek on the east, and the smaller, urban drainages between, including Dry, Tumwater, Valley, Peabody, White, Ennis, and Lees creeks. The headwaters of the Elwha River and Morse Creek lie in the Olympic Mountains. The smaller streams originate in foothills to the north of the main Olympic range and along the northern boundary of Olympic National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Dungeness River Watershed Action Plan Hood Canal Ranger District, Olympic National Forest
    Dungeness River Watershed Action Plan Hood Canal Ranger District, Olympic National Forest WATERSHED ACTION PLAN For Olympic National Forest Lands within the Dungeness River Watershed 1711002003 September 22, 2016 Dungeness River Watershed Action Plan Hood Canal Ranger District, Olympic National Forest The Dungeness watershed has been the focus for numerous committees, studies, and government projects to recover depleted wild stocks of salmon, restore salmon habitat, improve water quality and the overall condition of the watershed. The Olympic National Forest (ONF) has participated with other government agencies, citizens, and stakeholders to develop long-term management of the river and its resources, outline watershed restoration priorities, and implement the actions. This plan contains an aquatic and terrestrial watershed restoration strategy that incorporates recreational opportunities on the Olympic National Forest in the Dungeness 5th field watershed. The plan identifies restoration actions needed to correct known problems and help to put National Forest System (NFS) lands on a trajectory to improve the watershed condition. The 179,300 acre watershed and project analysis area includes both public and privately-owned lands, but with a primary focus on NFS lands. The Dungeness River begins in the snow fields at the southeast face of Mt. Mystery and flows through the foothills across the Sequim-Dungeness Valley, and enters the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The watershed is a municipal water supply and within close proximity of Sequim, Washington. The Dungeness River serves as crucial refugia for maintaining and recovering four species of fish listed under the Federal Endangered Species Act: Puget Sound Chinook, Puget Sound steelhead, Hood Canal summer chum, and Coastal Puget Sound bull trout.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Historical Populations of Steelhead Within the Puget Sound Distinct Population Segment Doi:10.7289/V5/TM-NWFSC-128
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-128 Identifying Historical Populations of Steelhead within the Puget Sound Distinct Population Segment doi:10.7289/V5/TM-NWFSC-128 March 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC Series The Northwest Fisheries Science Center of NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service uses the NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC series to issue scientific and technical publications. Manuscripts have been peer reviewed and edited. Documents published in this series can be cited in the scientific and technical literature. The Northwest Fisheries Science Center’s NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC series continues the NMFS- F/NWC series established in 1970 by the Northwest and Alaska Fisheries Science Center, which subsequently was divided into the Northwest Fisheries Science Center and the Alaska Fisheries Science Center. The latter center uses the NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC series. Reference throughout this document to trade names does not imply endorsement by the National Marine Fisheries Service. Reference this document as follows: Myers, J.M., J.J. Hard, E.J. Connor, R.A. Hayman, R.G. Kope, G. Lucchetti, A.R. Marshall, G.R. Pess, and B.E. Thompson. 2015. Identifying historical populations of steelhead within the Puget Sound distinct population segment. U.S. Dept. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS- NWFSC-128. doi:10.7289/V5/TM-NWFSC-128. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-128 Identifying Historical Populations of Steelhead within the Puget Sound Distinct Population Segment doi:10.7289/V5/TM-NWFSC-128 James M.
    [Show full text]
  • WRIA 18: Elwha-Dungeness
    ElWHA-DUNGENESS BASIN Water Resource Inventory Area 18 The Dungeness and Elwha rivers are the principal drain­ predominantly pool-riffle with few rapids and suitable ages within this basin. The Dungeness River with a total streambed for spawning and rearing of anadromous species. length of 31.9 linear miles and a watershed drainage of 198 The Elwha River originates deep in the Olympic Na­ square miles provides excellent spawning and rearing char­ tional Park from many glaciers and extends into a deep acteristics for both anadromous and resident fishes. The riv­ valley between the Bailey Range on the west and the Elk er's headwaters originate in the Olympic Mountains within Mountain, Mount Norton, Mount Christie, Mount Scott, national park boundaries. The mainstem Dungeness origi­ and Mount Barnes ranges on the east. Most of the tributary nates around the 4,000 foot level between Mount Constance headwaters originate at about the 4,000-foot elevation. De­ and Mount Deception and then flows northeast to the Strait spite the rugged headwater terrain, the river maintains of Juan de Fuca. The Greywolf River originates in the Nee­ mostly moderate gradient throughout much of its length dles Range between Mount Deception and Elk Mountain with excellent pool-riffle areas and occasional cascades and where Cameron Creek and Grand Creek also drain from ele­ rapids. The Elwha River contains 44.8 linear miles of total vations around 4,000 feet. The mainstem Dungeness flows stream length and 321 square miles of drainage area, but through a narrow valley and is characterized by many cas­ only 3.4 miles of main river above the mouth are accessible cades, falls, and rapids.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Olympics Wilderness and Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
    116TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 116–388 WILD OLYMPICS WILDERNESS AND WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACT FEBRUARY 4, 2020.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Mr. GRIJALVA, from the Committee on Natural Resources, submitted the following R E P O R T together with DISSENTING VIEWS [To accompany H.R. 2642] [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] The Committee on Natural Resources, to whom was referred the bill (H.R. 2642) to designate and expand wilderness areas in Olym- pic National Forest in the State of Washington, and to designate certain rivers in Olympic National Forest and Olympic National Park as wild and scenic rivers, and for other purposes, having con- sidered the same, report favorably thereon with an amendment and recommend that the bill as amended do pass. The amendment is as follows: Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the following: SEC. 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wild Olympics Wilderness and Wild and Scenic Riv- ers Act’’. SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF OLYMPIC NATIONAL FOREST WILDERNESS AREAS. (a) IN GENERAL.—In furtherance of the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), the following Federal land in the Olympic National Forest in the State of Wash- ington comprising approximately 126,554 acres, as generally depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Proposed Wild Olympics Wilderness and Wild and Scenic Rivers Act’’ and dated April 8, 2019 (referred to in this section as the ‘‘map’’), is designated as wil- derness and as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System: (1) LOST CREEK WILDERNESS.—Certain Federal land managed by the Forest Service, comprising approximately 7,159 acres, as generally depicted on the map, which shall be known as the ‘‘Lost Creek Wilderness’’.
    [Show full text]