DOCSLIB.ORG

The Making of British Bioethics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Making of British Bioethics The making of British bioethics WILSON BIOETHICS 9780719096198 PRINT.indd 1 17/07/2014 11:48 WILSON BIOETHICS 9780719096198 PRINT.indd 2 17/07/2014 11:48 The making of British bioethics Duncan Wilson Manchester University Press Copyright © Duncan Wilson 2014 The right of Duncan Wilson to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Published by Manchester University Press Altrincham Street, Manchester M1 7JA, UK and Room 400, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA www.manchesteruniversitypress.co.uk Distributed in the United States exclusively by Palgrave Macmillan, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010, USA Distributed in Canada exclusively by UBC Press, University of British Columbia, 2029 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z2 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data applied for ISBN 978 0 7190 9619 8 hardback ISBN 978 1 8477 9887 9 open access First published 2014 This electronic version has been made freely available under a Creative Commons (CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, thanks to the support of The Wellcome Trust. A copy of the licence can be viewed at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/uk/. The publisher has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for any external or third-party internet websites referred to in this book, and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate. Typeset in 10/12 Sabon by Servis Filmsetting Ltd, Stockport, Cheshire Printed in Great Britain by TJ International Ltd, Padstow To Nisha and my parents, and in memory of John Pickstone WILSON BIOETHICS 9780719096198 PRINT.indd 5 17/07/2014 11:48 WILSON BIOETHICS 9780719096198 PRINT.indd 6 17/07/2014 11:48 Contents Acknowledgements viii List of abbreviations x Introduction 1 1 Ethics ‘by and for professions’: the origins and endurance of club regulation 24 2 Ian Ramsey, theology and ‘trans-disciplinary’ medical ethics 64 3 ‘Who’s for bioethics?’ Ian Kennedy, oversight and accountability in the 1980s 105 4 ‘Where to draw the line?’ Mary Warnock, embryos and moral expertise 140 5 ‘A service to the community as a whole’: the emergence of bioethics in British universities 187 6 Consolidating the ‘ethics industry’: a national ethics committee and bioethics during the 1990s 220 Conclusion 255 Bibliography 270 Index 298 WILSON BIOETHICS 9780719096198 PRINT.indd 7 17/07/2014 11:48 Acknowledgements My interest in British bioethics started during my PhD research, when I noticed that philosophers, lawyers and other ‘outsiders’ had begun to enter debates that had traditionally been the preserve of doctors and scientists from the mid 1970s onwards. I soon realised that the growth of this outside input, or ‘bioethics’, was well documented for the United States, but that there was much less written for Britain, where it emerged slightly later and for different reasons. I decided then to make the history of British bioethics my next research topic. The progression from that initial idea to this book owes a lot to the help of many people. I first want to thank the Wellcome Trust for funding my research (grant number 081493). I am also grateful to the many archivists who provided access to materials. I want to thank staff at the National Archives, London; the Wellcome Library for the History of Medicine, London; the John Rylands Library at the University of Manchester; the British Film Institute, London; the Durham Cathedral archives; and the Historical Collections at the University of Virginia. I owe particular thanks to those people who allowed me to look through private papers and uncatalogued archives. I want to thank Catherine Spanswick, from the University of Manchester’s Institute for Science, Ethics and Innovation (ISEI), for letting me access papers from the Centre for Social Ethics and Policy; David Archard, from the University of Belfast, who let me look at papers from the Society for Applied Philosophy when he was working at the University of Lancaster; and Jonathan Montgomery, from University College London, who let me look through correspondence relating to the Nuffield Council on Bioethics. I am extremely grateful to all the interviewees listed in the bib- liography. My research would not have been possible had they not spared the time to meet me and patiently answer my questions. I am WILSON BIOETHICS 9780719096198 PRINT.indd 8 17/07/2014 11:48 Acknowledgements ix also grateful to the many people whom I did not formally interview, but who provided me with crucial materials and leads. I owe par- ticular thanks to Robin Downie, for his hospitality in Glasgow and many useful readings. I also owe thanks to David Archard, Margaret Brazier, Raymond Plant, Rebecca Bennett, Richard Ashcroft, Adam Hedgecoe, David Weatherhall, Nathan Emmerich, Noortje Jacobs and Bella Starling, for providing valuable material and information on developments in sociology, bioethics, philosophy, law and the biomedical sciences. I am also indebted to everyone who gave feedback on seminar papers at the University of Leeds, the London School for Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University College London, Imperial College London, the University of Liverpool, the University of Manchester, the Postgraduate Conference on Bioethics and the Institute for Historical Research’s 2011 conference on Anglo-American History. I am espe- cially grateful to colleagues at the University of Manchester’s Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine (CHSTM), who gave me valuable advice on ideas, drafts and potential titles. These include, in no particular order, Michael Worboys, Neil Pemberton, Emma Jones, Michael Bresalier, Carsten Timmermann, Ed Ramsden, Rob Kirk, Elizabeth Toon and Jenny Goodare. I owe particular thanks to my former colleague Sam Alberti, now director of the Hunterian Museum at the Royal College of Surgeons in London, and to John Pickstone, most recently emeritus professor at CHSTM, who both gave feedback on several draft chapters. We were all deeply saddened when John died following a short illness in February 2014. He was CHSTM’s founding director and remained a huge presence in the department, and the field more gener- ally, until his death. Aside from an incomparable body of work, John’s legacy is evident in the number of historians he mentored and encour- aged – myself included. I valued his help with this book as much as I did when I started my PhD under his supervision, and will miss his guidance and friendship. John’s advice was peerless, as always, and improved the book a great deal. It goes without saying that any mistakes that may appear in the following chapters are mine alone. I also want to thank friends and family who have put up with me throughout this whole process. My parents, John and Helen Wilson, continue to provide invaluable support and still don’t tell me to ‘get a real job’. Nisha, meanwhile, is the best proofreader, friend and wife anyone could wish for. WILSON BIOETHICS 9780719096198 PRINT.indd 9 17/07/2014 11:48 Abbreviations AAMR Association for the Advancement of Medicine by Research BAAS British Association for the Advancement of Science BMA British Medical Association BSSRS British Society for Social Responsibility in Science CCH Churches’ Council of Healing CCHMS Central Committee for Hospital Medical Services CEC Central Ethical Committee CHAI Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection CHI Commission for Health Improvement CMO Chief Medical Officer CSEP Centre for Social Ethics and Policy DES Department of Education and Science DHSS Department for Health and Social Security EMG Edinburgh Medical Group ESBAC Emerging Science and Bioethics Advisory Committee FMG Frontier Medical Group GMAG Genetic Manipulation Advisory Group GMC General Medical Council HFEA Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority HGC Human Genetics Commission HRA Health Research Agency HTA Human Tissue Authority IME Institute of Medical Ethics IRM Institute of Religion and Medicine LMG London Medical Group MMG Manchester Medical Group MRC Medical Research Council NCP National Committee for Philosophy WILSON BIOETHICS 9780719096198 PRINT.indd 10 17/07/2014 11:48 Abbreviations xi PHS Public Health Service RAE Research Assessment Exercise REC Research Ethics Committee RCP Royal College of Physicians SCM Student Christian Mission SPUC Society for the Protection of Unborn Children SSME Society for the Study of Medical Ethics UCL University College London UCLA University of California, Los Angeles UFC Universities Funding Council UGC University Grants Commission WILSON BIOETHICS 9780719096198 PRINT.indd 11 17/07/2014 11:48 WILSON BIOETHICS 9780719096198 PRINT.indd 12 17/07/2014 11:48 Introduction What is bioethics? Recent decades have witnessed profound shifts in the politics of medicine and the biological sciences, in which members of several professions now consider issues that were traditionally the preserve of doctors and scientists. In government committees and organisa- tions such as the General Medical Council, professional conduct is determined by a diverse group of participants that includes phi- losophers, lawyers, theologians, social scientists, doctors, scientists, healthcare managers and representatives from patient or pressure groups. Teaching ethics, once a matter of professional etiquette, takes place on dedicated courses and in specialised departments that emphasise
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Acknowledgements
    Acknowledgements The cataloguing of the Manchester Medical Collections was made possible by a grant from the fund for Research Resources for Medical History set up by the Wellcome Trust. We are indebted to the Wellcome Trust for its continuing support for the history of medicine in The University of Manchester. Many colleagues and friends have helped to bring this volume to completion.We are grateful to all the contributors for their patience and forbearance during the long editing process. Dr Dorothy Clayton guided us expertly through the production of the volume and took much of the pain from that process. Many of the papers feature images taken from the JRUL collections and we would like to thank Carol Burrows for help with the selection and production of these illustrations. We are grateful to the following for permission to reproduce images: L'Institut Pasteur, p. 102; Tameside Local Studies and Archives Centre, Central Library, Ashton-under-Lyne, pp. 89, 105; The Royal Society, p. 159; The Medical Illustration Unit, Manchester Royal Infirmary, pp. 170, 172, 177, 178, 180; Anthony Bentley, Scientific Photographer, Faculty of Life Sciences, The University of Manchester, pp. 217, 218, 219 and 220. All other illustrations were taken from the collections held by the John Rylands University Library. John Pickstone Stella Butler 7 Contributors Julie Anderson is a Research Fellow at the Centre for the History of Science,Technology and Medicine and the Wellcome Unit for the History of Medicine at The University of Manchester. Her areas of research include the history of disability and she has published on physical disability and war.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Services Ombudsmen. This Consultation
    The Law Commission Consultation Paper No 196 PUBLIC SERVICES OMBUDSMEN A Consultation Paper ii THE LAW COMMISSION – HOW WE CONSULT About the Law Commission The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Rt Hon Lord Justice Munby (Chairman), Professor Elizabeth Cooke, Mr David Hertzell, Professor David Ormerod1 and Miss Frances Patterson QC. The Chief Executive is: Mr Mark Ormerod CB. Topic of this consultation This consultation paper deals with the public services ombudsmen. Impact assessment An impact assessment is included in Appendix A. Scope of this consultation The purpose of this consultation is to generate responses to our provisional proposals. Duration of the consultation We invite responses from 2 September 2010 to 3 December 2010. How to respond By email to: [email protected] By post to: Public Law Team, Law Commission, Steel House, 11 Tothill Street, London, SW1H 9LJ Tel: 020-3334-0262 / Fax: 020-3334-0201 If you send your comments by post, it would be helpful if, wherever possible, you could send them to us electronically as well (for example, on CD or by email to the above address, in any commonly used format. After the consultation In the light of the responses we receive, we will decide our final recommendations and we will present them to Parliament. It will be for Parliament to decide whether to approve any changes to the law. Code of Practice We are a signatory to the Government’s Code of Practice on Consultation and carry out our consultations in accordance with the Code criteria (set out on the next page).
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Government for BIA Members
    A guide to the Government for BIA members Correct as of 26 June 2020 This is a briefing for BIA members on the Government led by Boris Johnson and key ministerial appointments for our sector after the December 2019 General Election and February 2020 Cabinet reshuffle. Following the Conservative Party’s compelling victory, the Government now holds a majority of 80 seats in the House of Commons. The life sciences sector is high on the Government’s agenda and Boris Johnson has pledged to make the UK “the leading global hub for life sciences after Brexit”. With its strong majority, the Government has the power to enact the policies supportive of the sector in the Conservatives 2019 Manifesto. All in all, this indicates a positive outlook for life sciences during this Government’s tenure. Contents: Ministerial and policy maker positions in the new Government relevant to the life sciences sector .......................................................................................... 2 Ministers and policy maker profiles................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Ministerial and policy maker positions in the new Government relevant to the life sciences sector* *Please note that this guide only covers ministers and responsibilities relevant to the life sciences and will be updated as further roles and responsibilities are announced. Department Position Holder Relevant responsibility Holder in
    [Show full text]
  • Download Clinton Email November Release
    UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05772613 Date: 11/30/2015 RELEASE IN FULL CONFIDENTIAL October 9, 2010 For: Hillary From: Sid Re: Yes, some things: 1. Richard Wolff told me that one of the reasons Jones was summarily executed was payback for dumping Mark Lippert (whom he called "Thing Two," from Dr. Seuss' Cat in the Hat), McDonough's sidekick (whom Jones calls "Thing One"). Of course, Jones had to go to Obama himself to dispose of Lippert. The true cause was that Thing One and Thing Two were leaking negative stories about Jones. McDonough, naturally, has assumed Donilon's post. Obladi, oblada, as John Lennon (who would have been 70) might say. 2. Shaun Woodward is in the Labour shadow cabinet in his former position as Secretary of State for Northern Ireland. Gordon Brown's hatchetman, Charlie Whelan, whose job was to undercut Tony, had worked the unions to vote for Ed Miliband rather than Ed Balls (the one closest to Gordon) in order to beat David--the last scene in the revenge tragedy of Gordon v. Tony. Only 19 percent of the union people voted, but were credited with the full one-third of Labour votes for leader selection, so a minority of a minority threw the election by 1.3 percent to Ed. Then Balls, his wife Yvette Cooper (an MP and former cabinet secretary), and other Brownites ran as a slate for shadow cabinet--the first time the shadow cabinet was to be elected by the constituency. That succeeded to electing them all and shutting out Peter Hain, the former deputy PM, as well as Shaun.
    [Show full text]
  • Glover, Jonathan. Humanity: a Moral History of the Twentieth Century
    Glover, Jonathan. Humanity: A Moral History of the Twentieth Century. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press: 2000. Jonathan Glover (1941-____ A.D.) directs the Centre of Medical Law and Ethics at King’s College, London. Preface. What lessons in ethics ought one to derive from the violence of the twentieth century? Chapter 1: Never Such Innocence Again. At the end of the twentieth century, one cannot be certain of the existence of a moral law or of moral progress. Intellectual repudiation of moral law and last century’s history argue against them. News tends to anesthetize viewers to events. Everything gets forgotten in the endless news cycle. Glover has not experienced the events of which he writes. He is attempting to get perspective on them. In philosophical ethics, there has been a move from theoretical ethics to applied ethics, putting human concerns squarely in philosophy’s crosshairs. Ethics generally should be more empirical. Enlightenment confidence that rationality would banish war and cruelty proved shallow. Glover looks at human spiritual darkness, in the hope of restraining it in the service of a better future. PART ONE: ETHICS WITHOUT THE MORAL LAW Chapter 2: Nietzsche’s Challenge. Friedrich Nietzsche foresaw the collapse of religious morality in the twentieth century. Nietzsche valued self-creation, and castigated all authorities that might claim to govern or restrain that project. God is dead. Religion is poison and must be swept away. Governments rely on confusions of the masses. A self-created man is noble in the sense that his superior completeness frees him to do whatever he may need in order to self-create.
    [Show full text]
  • Yougov / the Sunday Times Survey Results
    YouGov / The Sunday Times Survey Results Sample Size: 1011 Labour Party Members Fieldwork: 7th - 9th September 2010 1st Preference - September 2010 1st Preference - July 2010 September Choice July Choice Gender Age Diane Andy David Ed Diane Andy David Ed David Ed David Ed Total Ed Balls Ed Balls Male Female 18-34 35-54 55+ Abbott Burnham Miliband Miliband Abbott Burnham Miliband Miliband Miliband Miliband Miliband Miliband Weighted Sample 1008 106 86 91 354 287 99 45 65 244 209 431 474 320 340 577 432 331 303 374 Unweighted Sample 1011 102 89 97 344 296 93 45 69 239 221 429 485 310 353 654 357 307 317 387 % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 1st Preference - September 2010 [Excluding Don't know and Wouldn't Vote] David Miliband 38 0001000824 9 79 16 83 0 68 11 36 42 41 39 35 Ed Miliband 31 00001001114 13 11 69 1 62 11 50 31 31 33 28 33 Diane Abbott 11 1000000702 3144164181112131111 Andy Burnham 10 001000029 66 4 6 7 10 10 10 12 7 8 10 11 Ed Balls 9 0100000852 10 5 6 5 12 7 11 10 8 5 13 10 Weighted Sample 846 92 82 84 320 268 84 41 55 214 186 384 427 279 296 493 353 280 258 308 Unweighted Sample 849 90 85 89 308 277 80 41 58 207 199 380 438 268 309 555 294 260 266 323 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% 2nd Preference - September 2010 [Excluding Don't know and Wouldn't Vote] Ed Miliband 30 53 48 34 43 0 42 32 25 33 22 35 27 30 29 29 32 32 33 26 Ed Balls 22 200 2825251936 26 23 21 23 21 24 22 23 21 20 23 23 Andy Burnham 19 14 17 0 21 24 14 18 19 21 18 19 19 19 18 18 20 21 20 16 David Miliband 17 13 20 30 0 35 13 12 24 10 27 13 21 16 20 17 17 15 12 23 Diane Abbott 11 0 15 8 11 16 11 2 7 12 12 9 12 11 11 12 10 12 11 12 Weighted Sample 905 90 74 75 351 285 82 40 56 233 203 431 474 299 319 519 387 303 267 336 Unweighted Sample 914 87 78 84 341 293 79 40 60 228 214 429 485 290 334 592 322 283 280 351 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Miliband preference - September [Excluding definitely wouldn't vote] David Miliband 48 19 28 41 100 1 25 34 37 86 17 100 0 80 17 47 49 48 46 48 Ed Miliband 52 81 72 59 0 99 75 66 63 14 83 0 100 20 83 53 51 52 54 52 1 © 2010 YouGov plc.
    [Show full text]
  • Particularitiesof Tony Blair' Governments'foreign Policy Decision
    Максим Прихненко . Особливості механізму прийняття зовнішньополітичних рішень … 321 Історико -політичні проблеми сучасного світу : Modern Historical and Political Issues: Збірник наукових статей . – Чернівці : Journal in Historical & Political Sciences. – Chernivtsi: Чернівецький національний університет , Chernivtsi National University, 2016. – Т. 33-34. – С. 321-327 2016. – Volume. 33-34. – pp. 321-327 УДК : 32-327(410) © Максим Прихненко 1 Особливості механізму прийняття зовнішньополітичних рішень в урядах Тоні Блера В статті системно проаналізовано модель прийняття зовнішньополітичних рішень , а також ключові фактори , які впливали на формування та впровадження цих рішень у зовнішньополіти- чний курс Великобританії у якості складової частини загальної моделі лідерства Тоні Блера . Ключові слова Модель лідерства , механізм прийняття рішень , блеризм . Particularitiesof Tony Blair’ governments’foreign policy decision-making process The present article is devoted to the problem of particularities of Tony Blair’ governments’ foreign policy decision-making process. The aim of the paper is to analyze the decision-making model formed by Tony Blair as well as to identify key factors which impacted the process of creation and implemen- tation of foreign policy decisions in the framework of Tony Blair’ leadership model. It was concluded that Tony Blair had formed tree level decision-making system. Rolls of the Parliament and the Gov- ernment in the deliberation process were frustrated. On the other hand, special advisers and so called selective committees impacts were strengthened. This institutes played the role of consulting bodies on specific issues of the agenda. Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs were the driving force of all process. But usually the second one was like the executor of Prime Minister’ decision.
    [Show full text]
  • MARRIAGE CERTIFICATES © NDFHS Page 1
    MARRIAGE CERTIFICATES No GROOMSURNAME Groomforename BRIDESURNAME Brideforename D M Y PLACE 588 ABBOT William HADAWAY Ann 25 Jul 1869 Tynemouth 935 ABBOTT Edwin NESS Sarah Jane 20 JUL 1882 Wallsend Parrish Church Northumbrland ADAMS Thomas BORTON Mary 16 OCT 1849 Coughton Northampton 556 ADAMSON James Frederick TATE Annabell 6 Oct 1861 Tynemouth 655 ADAMSON Robert GRAHAM Hannah 23 OCT 1847 Darlington Co Durham 581 ADAMSON William BENSON Hannah 24 Feb 1847 Whitehaven Cumberland ADDISON James WILSON Jane Elizabeth 23 JUL 1871 Carlisle, Cumberland 694 ADDY Frederick BELL Jane 26 DEC 1922 Barnsley Yorks 1456 AFFLECK James LUCKLEY Ann 1 APR 1839 Newcastle upon Tyne 1457 AGNEW William KIRKPATRICK Mary 30 MAY 1887 Newcastle upon Tyne 751 AINGER David TURNER Eliza 28 FEB 1870 Essex 704 AIR Thomas MCKENZIE Ann 24 MAY 1871 Belford NBL 936 AISTON John ELLIOTT Esther 26 FEB 1881 Sunderland 244 AITCHISON John COCKBURN Jane 22 Aug 1865 Utd Pres Ch Newcastle ALBION Henry Edward SCOTT Margaret 6 APR 1884 St Mark Millfield Durham ALDER John Cowens WRIGHT Ann 24 JUN 1856 Newcastle /Tyne 1160 ALDERSON Joseph Henry ANDERSON Eliza 22 JUN 1897 Heworth Co Durham ALLABURTON John GREEN Jane 24 DEC 1842 St. Giles ,Durham City 1505 ALLAN Edward PERCY Sarah 17 JUL 1854 St. Nicholas, Newcastle on Tyne 1390 ALLEN Alexander Bowman WANDLESS Jessie 10 JUL 1943 Darlington Co Durham 992 ALLEN Peter F THOMPSON Sheila 18 MAY 1957 Newcastle upon Tyne 1161 ALLEN Thomas HIGGINS Annie 4 OCT 1887 South Shields 158 ALLISON John JACKSON Jane Ann 31 Jul 1859 Colliery, Catchgate,
    [Show full text]
  • Inhuman Wrongs Crimes Against Humanity in Theory, Law, and Politics
    Inhuman Wrongs Crimes against Humanity in Theory, Law, and Politics Goya, Third of May 1808 Government 94gl* Professor Cheryl Welch Fall 2016 [email protected] Thursday 2:00-4:00 617.495.5855 CGIS Knafel Building– K108 CGIS K151A Office Hours: by appointment Course Description This course examines the notion of a crime against humanity from the perspectives of moral theory, history, and contemporary international law and politics. After considering some philosophical perspectives on abuses whose wrongness has been termed “morally over- determined,” we turn to nineteenth-century cases of so-called scandals against humanity: slavery and expulsion or extermination of conquered peoples. We then trace the emergence of the concept of crimes against humanity in the twentieth century as a category of international crime at the intersection of human rights and humanitarian law and examine debates over the legalization offenses that “shock the conscience.” Finally, we turn to philosophical and political debates surrounding the prevention and prosecution of some contemporary crimes against humanity. *This course counts as a Government seminar or elective. It also counts toward the secondary concentration in Ethnicity, Migration, and Rights. Welch 94gl - fall 2016 - page 1 of 6 Course Requirements 1. Class participation (30% of grade) • Blog posts: Students are expected to have done the readings and to come to the seminar prepared to discuss them. Before each class (except for the class in which you are presenting), you will be expected to post a short response to the reading. Posts are due on Canvas by 8 am on Thursday morning. First post is due on Thurs., Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parliamentary Ombudsman: Firefighter Or Fire-Watcher?
    12 The Parliamentary Ombudsman: Firefi ghter or fi re-watcher? Contents 1. In search of a role 2. The PCA’s offi ce 3. From maladministration to good administration 4. Firefi ghting or fi re-watching? (a) The small claims court (b) Ombudsmen and courts (c) Fire-watching: Inspection and audit 5. Inquisitorial procedure (a) Screening (b) Investigation (c) Report 6. The ‘Big Inquiry’ (a) Grouping complaints: The Child Support Agency (b) Political cases 7. Occupational pensions: Challenging the ombudsman 8. Control by courts? 9. Conclusion: An ombudsman unfettered? 1. In search of a role In Chapter 10, we considered complaints-handling by the administration, set- tling for a ‘bottom-up’ approach. Th is led us to focus on proportionate dispute resolution (PDR) and machinery, such as internal review, by which complaints can be settled before they ripen into disputes. In so doing, we diverged from the ‘top-down’ tradition of administrative law where tribunals are seen as court substitutes. We returned to the classic approach in Chapter 11, looking at the recent reorganisation of the tribunal service and its place in the administrative justice system. We saw how the oral and adversarial tradition of British justice was refl ected in tribunal procedure and considered the importance attached to impartiality and independence, values now protected by ECHR Art. 6(1). We, 529 The Parliamentary Ombudsman: Firefi ghter or fi re-watcher? however, argued that recent reshaping of the tribunal system left unanswered key questions about oral and adversarial proceedings and whether they are always the most appropriate vehicle for resolving disputes with the administra- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Patient's View: Doing Medical History from Below Author(S): Roy Porter Source: Theory and Society, Vol
    The Patient's View: Doing Medical History from below Author(s): Roy Porter Source: Theory and Society, Vol. 14, No. 2 (Mar., 1985), pp. 175-198 Published by: Springer Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/657089 . Accessed: 10/04/2013 19:27 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Theory and Society. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 131.113.213.135 on Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:27:23 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 175 THE PATIENT'S VIEW Doing Medical History from Below ROY PORTER Medicine today is a supremely well-entrenched, prestigious profession, yoked to a body of relatively autonomous, self-directingscience, expertise, and practices. It is hardly surprising, then, that it has tended to produce histories of itself essentially cast in the mold of its own currentimage, stories of successive breakthroughs in medical science, heroic pioneers of surgical techniques, of the supersessionof ignorant folkloric remediesand barefaced charlatanry through the rise of medicine as a liberal, ethical, corporate profession. Even historians and historical sociologists who have taken more skeptical views of medicine's past, perhaps stressing its failures or underlin- ing the self-servingfeatures of professionalization,have neverthelessimplic- itly endorsed the view that the history of healing is par excellence the history of doctors.
    [Show full text]
  • Johnston, Alan
    Alan Johnston Personal Details Name Alan Johnston Dates 1928 Place of Birth UK (Manchester) Main work places Aberdeen Principal field of work Clinical genetics Short biography See below Interview Recorded interview made Yes Interviewer Peter Harper Date of Interview 24/09/2008 Edited transcript available See below Personal Scientific Records Significant Record set exists Records catalogued Permanent place of archive Summary of archive Biography Alan Johnston was born 8.1.1928 in Manchester, educated at Manchester Grammar School and studied medicine at Cambridge and UCH qualifying in 1951. He later spent a year at Johns Hopkins Hospital. He became Consultant Physician in the Aberdeen Teaching Hospitals in 1966 and subsequently Clinical Senior Lecturer in medicine and genetics. Fellowship of the three Colleges of Physicians followed. With Eric McKay, he initiated the clinical genetics service for N.E.Scotland. With David Pyke, he played a crucial role in the setting up of the Clinical Genetics Committee of the College of Physicians and was its first Hon. Sec. He also served in various capacities on other committees and working parties concerned in the recognition of the specialty and its training programme, including the Scottish Molecular Genetics Consortium. In addition to lectures to the Royal Colleges, he published around one hundred papers. His outside interests include eldership of the Church of Scotland, active membership of the Christian Medical Fellowship, travel, gardening, archaeology and three grandchildren. INTERVIEW WITH DR ALAN JOHNSTON, 24th SEPTEMBER, 2008 PSH. It’s 24th September 2008 and I’m talking with Dr Alan Johnston from Aberdeen and the recording is being made in London.
    [Show full text]