174 Kinney Street Landmark Assessment Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

174 Kinney Street Landmark Assessment Report 174 Kinney Street Landmark Assessment Report Santa Monica, CA 90405 Prepared for: City of Santa Monica Planning & Community Development Department 1685 Main Street, Room 212 Santa Monica, CA 90401 Prepared by: Architectural Resources Group, Inc. Architects, Planners & Conservators 8 Mills Place, Suite 300 Pasadena, CA 91105 March 31, 2015 174 Kinney Street, Santa Monica Landmark Assessment Report Page 1 1. Introduction At the request of the City of Santa Monica’s Planning and Community Development Department, Architectural Resources Group, Inc. (ARG) has prepared this Landmark Assessment Report for 174 Kinney Street in Santa Monica, Los Angeles County. The property at 174 Kinney Street contains a one‐story commercial building constructed between ca. 1915 and 1926. It is commercial vernacular in style, with Art Deco elements. It was originally owned by the Pacific Electric Railway and built onto the rear of the commercial building at 171‐177 Pier Avenue; it was historically known by the Pier Avenue addresses. ARG evaluated the property to determine whether it appears to satisfy one or more of the statutory criteria associated with City of Santa Monica Landmark eligibility, pursuant to Chapter 9.36 (Landmarks and Historic Districts Ordinance) of the Santa Monica Municipal Code. Completion of this assessment involved a site visit and visual inspection of the building’s exterior on March 3, 2015; compilation and review of historical building permits obtained from the City’s Planning and Community Development Department; archival research conducted at the Santa Monica Public Library and various online repositories; development of applicable historic contexts and themes; and evaluation of eligibility under Santa Monica Landmark criteria. This report was prepared by ARG staff Katie E. Horak, Senior Associate and Architectural Historian and Preservation Planner, Mary Ringhoff, Associate and Architectural Historian and Preservation Planner, and Evanne St. Charles, Architectural Historian and Preservation Planner, all of whom meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for Architectural History and History. In summary, ARG finds that 174 Kinney Street appears eligible under City of Santa Monica Landmark Criteria 9.36.100(a)(1) and 9.36.100(a)(6). The following sections provide a contextual basis for analysis and a detailed discussion of how this determination was made. Architectural Resources Group, Inc. Architects, Planners, & Conservators 174 Kinney Street, Santa Monica Landmark Assessment Report Page 2 2. Architectural Description 2.1 Site and Setting The property at 174 Kinney Street is located in southwest Santa Monica, in a densely developed commercial and large‐scale multi‐family residential area one block from the waterfront. The building sits on the south side of Kinney Street, at the southeast corner of Kinney and Neilson Way. It is located within the Ocean Park neighborhood, roughly bounded by Lincoln Boulevard, Pico Boulevard, the waterfront, and Santa Monica City limits, and sits at the western edge of the Main Street commercial district. This district is composed of one and two‐story commercial and mixed‐use buildings, most of which date from the early 1910s to the mid‐1930s. While the topography of the area is relatively flat, Kinney Street slopes gently to the east toward Main Street in the block in which the subject property is located. The area adheres to Santa Monica’s skewed orthogonal street network and is divided into a series of rectilinear blocks that are roughly uniform in size and shape. The neighborhood’s commercial lots are consistent in size and shape east of Neilson Way, which was originally the Pacific Electric Railway’s right‐of‐way (known as Trolleyway); they are larger to the west toward the ocean, reflecting a long history of recreational occupations as well as the influence of the Ocean Park Redevelopment Project in the 1960s. This project demolished numerous early commercial and residential properties west of Trolleyway and resulted in the erection of large apartment and condominium complexes. Sited on a single rectangular parcel, the building at 174 Kinney Street is flush with the sidewalk and attached at its south end to a mixed‐use two‐story commercial building, constructed at the same time. Site map. The subject property, 174 Kinney Street, is outlined in red. Aerial imagery courtesy maps.google.com. Architectural Resources Group, Inc. Architects, Planners, & Conservators 174 Kinney Street, Santa Monica Landmark Assessment Report Page 3 2.2 Building Exterior The property at 174 Kinney Street is built in a commercial vernacular idiom, with Art Deco design elements at the primary façade. The one‐story rectangular building is constructed of reinforced brick and concrete with brick and stucco cladding and a low‐pitched, front‐gabled roof. The roof is sheathed with rolled asphalt and features three monitors at the roof ridge. The two northernmost monitors have hipped roofs and feature multi‐light wood skylights. The monitor toward the rear of the building has a flat roof and windows of unknown type and material. The roof is bookended by the adjacent two‐story building at the south and a stepped parapet at the north. The building’s primary (north) façade fronts on Kinney Street and is more decorative than the other elevations; it appears as though this façade was added to an existing ca. 1915 building in 1926. The façade is symmetrical and divided into three bays, which are articulated by brick pilasters. The central bay is taller than the flanking bays, creating a vertical appearance. A recessed entry of partially glazed double wood doors, surrounded by wide wood sidelights and a transom, is located in the central bay. Large paired fixed wood windows are located in each outer bay. Numerous signs, planters, an awning and various decorative elements have been added to the façade. The entrance doors, sidelights, and transom in the central bay likely replaced a vehicular (automobile) entry when the building became a restaurant in the late 1970s. The west elevation fronts on Neilson Way, a former Pacific Electric streetcar route. This elevation is fairly simple and flush with the sidewalk. The roof eave steps up approximately one foot toward the rear of the building to compensate for the slight change of topography; a rolled concrete cornice and pent roof clad with red clay tile finish the parapet. Paired multi‐light wood casement windows with thick concrete lintels are uniformly spaced on the façade. Near the center of the elevation are a single multi‐light wood casement window and a plain wood door. At the north end of the west façade, a concrete lintel (presumably topping what used to be a window opening) appears to have been truncated and an opening infilled with brick when the north façade was modified in the 1920s. The east elevation faces a narrow patio now used for outdoor dining purposes. Much of the façade is not visible from the public right‐of‐way. The elevation has been re‐clad with stucco, and two small wood additions have been constructed near its south end. Architectural Resources Group, Inc. Architects, Planners, & Conservators 174 Kinney Street, Santa Monica Landmark Assessment Report Page 4 North and west elevations, view southeast. ARG, 3/3/15. Primary (north) elevation, view south. ARG, 3/3/15. East elevation, view southwest. ARG, 3/3/15. West elevation and south end abutting building. ARG, 3/3/15. Detail: rear of primary façade. ARG, 3/3/15. Detail: northwest portion of building. ARG, 3/3/15. Architectural Resources Group, Inc. Architects, Planners, & Conservators 174 Kinney Street, Santa Monica Landmark Assessment Report Page 5 3. Alterations and Chronology of Development Upon review of archive building permits obtained from the City of Santa Monica’s Planning and Community Development Department, historic aerial photographs, Sanborn Fire Insurance Company maps, property data obtained from the Los Angeles County Assessor’s Office, and historic Santa Monica business directories, ARG prepared the following chronology of development for 174 Kinney Street. This chronology provides a summary of the property’s development and alterations that have been made over time, as can be best ascertained from available primary and secondary sources. Sanborn maps and newspaper accounts indicate that the northwest corner of Trolleyway and Pier Avenue was occupied by a one‐story confectionery with a detached rear office, both with the address 171 Pier Avenue, from 1902 until about 1915. A second one‐story building with two storefronts sat 40 feet to the east, within the same large parcel that was part of the Los Angeles Pacific/Pacific Electric Railway right‐of way. Around 1915, these buildings were removed and a new, multi‐part, mixed‐use building was constructed. As shown on the 1918 Sanborn map below, this larger building had a two‐ story volume with five storefronts fronting on Pier Avenue with the addresses 171‐179 Pier Avenue; the upper story contained apartments. The building also included a one‐story volume fronting on Trolleyway with the addresses 2937‐2945 Trolleyway, and a large rear one‐story volume containing the Auto Inn Garage and repair facility, with no separate address. 1918 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map showing 171‐179 Pier Avenue. Santa Monica business directory research found a range of occupants at the Pier Avenue addresses over time, ranging from doctors and milliners to radio repair shops and grocers. In almost every year for which business directories are available, one of the occupants is related to auto repair or garage operations, suggesting the continuous use of the rear volume for auto‐related purposes. The first was the Reed and Layne Garage (1915‐1916), which became the Auto Inn Garage in 1917 and remained in operation under that name until around 1923, when it became the Ocean Park Garage. Between 1917 and 1920, business directories also list the Auto Inn Apartments in the building, presumably located in the upper story.
Recommended publications
  • Valley & Spruce Project Initial Study and Mitigated
    VALLEY & SPRUCE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Prepared for: City of Rialto December 2017 VALLEY & SPRUCE PROJECT INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Prepared For: City of Rialto 150 S. Palm Avenue Rialto, CA 92376 Prepared By: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 401 B Street, Suite 600 San Diego, California 92101 December 2017 095894012 Copyright © 2017 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Initial Study ............................................................................................................................................ 1 II. Description of Proposed Project ........................................................................................................... 2 III. Required Permits ................................................................................................................................... 8 IV. Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ......................................................................................... 9 V. Determination ........................................................................................................................................ 9 VI. Environmental Evaluation .................................................................................................................. 10 1. Aesthetics ................................................................................................................................ 10 2. Agricultural and Forestry Resources .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MCO Arrival Wayfnding Map
    MCO Arrival Wayfnding Map N SIDE Gates 1-29 Level 1 Gates 100-129 Ground Transportation & Baggage Claim (8A) Level 2 Baggage Claim Gates 10-19 Gates Ticketing Locations 20-29 Gates 100-111 A-1 A-2 Level 3 A-3 A-4 2 1 Gates Gates 1-9 112-129 Hyatt Regency - Lvl.4 - Lvl.4 Regency Hyatt Security Checkpoint To Gates 70 - 129 70 Gates To Food Court To Gates 1-59 1-59 Gates To Security Checkpoint Gates 70-79 Gates 50-59 To Parking “C” Gates 3 90-99 4 B-1 B-2 Level 3 B-3 B-4 Gates Gates 30-39 Ticketing Locations Gates 80-89 40-49 Gates 70-99 Level 2 Gates 30-59 Baggage Claim Level 1 Ground Transportation & Baggage Claim (28B) SIDE C Check-in and baggage claim locations subject to change. Please check signage on arrival. *Map not to scale Find it ALL in One Place Welcome to Orlando Download the Orlando MCO App Available for International Airport (MCO) OrlandoAirports.net /flymco @MCO @flymco Flight Arrival Guide 03/18 To reach the Main Terminal, The journey to the To retrieve checked baggage, take follow directions on the overhead Main Terminal (A-Side or B-Side) the stairs, escalator or elevator down signage to the shuttle station 2 takes just over one minute. As the 4 6 to the Arrivals/Baggage Claim on which is located in the center train transports you, observe the Level 2. Check the monitors to of the Airside Terminal. signage and listen to the instructions determine the correct carousel directing you to either Baggage Claim A for your flight.
    [Show full text]
  • GOOGLE LLC V. ORACLE AMERICA, INC
    (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2020 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus GOOGLE LLC v. ORACLE AMERICA, INC. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT No. 18–956. Argued October 7, 2020—Decided April 5, 2021 Oracle America, Inc., owns a copyright in Java SE, a computer platform that uses the popular Java computer programming language. In 2005, Google acquired Android and sought to build a new software platform for mobile devices. To allow the millions of programmers familiar with the Java programming language to work with its new Android plat- form, Google copied roughly 11,500 lines of code from the Java SE pro- gram. The copied lines are part of a tool called an Application Pro- gramming Interface (API). An API allows programmers to call upon prewritten computing tasks for use in their own programs. Over the course of protracted litigation, the lower courts have considered (1) whether Java SE’s owner could copyright the copied lines from the API, and (2) if so, whether Google’s copying constituted a permissible “fair use” of that material freeing Google from copyright liability. In the proceedings below, the Federal Circuit held that the copied lines are copyrightable.
    [Show full text]
  • Trolleybuses: Applicability of UN Regulation No
    Submitted by the expert from OICA Informal document GRSG-110-08-Rev.1 (110th GRSG, 26-29 April 2016, agenda item 2(a)) Trolleybuses: Applicability of UN Regulation No. 100 (Electric Power Train Vehicle) vs. UN Regulation No. 107 Annex 12 (Construction of M2/M3 Vehicles) for Electrical Safety 1. At 110th session of GRSG Belgium proposes to amend UN R107 annex 12 by deleting the requirements for trolleybuses (see GRSG/2016/05) and transfer the requirements into UN R100 (see GRSP/2016/07), which will be on the agenda of upcoming GRSP session in May 2016. 2. Due to the design of a trolleybus and stated in UN Regulation No. 107, trolleybuses are dual- mode vehicles. They can operate either: (a) in trolley mode, when connected to the overhead contact line (OCL), or (b) in bus mode when not connected to the OCL. When not connected to the OCL, they can also be (c) in charging mode, where they are stationary and plugged into the power grid for battery charging. 3. The basic principles of the design of the electric powertrain of the trolleybus and the connection to the OCL is based on international standards developed for trams and trains and is implemented and well accepted in the market worldwide. 4. Due to the fact that the trolleybus is used on public roads the trolleybus has to fulfil the regulations under the umbrella of the UNECE regulatory framework due to the existing national regulations (e.g. European frame work directive). 5. Therefore the annex 12 in UN R107 was amended to align the additional safety prescriptions for trolleybuses with the corresponding electrical standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Claremore Public Works Authority Meeting Council Chambers, City Hall, 104 S
    MINUTES OF CLAREMORE PUBLIC WORKS AUTHORITY MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 104 S. MUSKOGEE, CLAREMORE, OKLAHOMA MARCH 03, 2008 CALL TO ORDER Meeting called to order by Mayor Brant Shallenburger at 6:00 P.M. ROLL CALL Nan Pope called roll. The following were: Present: Brant Shallenburger, Buddy Robertson, Tony Mullenger, Flo Guthrie, Mick Webber, Terry Chase, Tom Lehman, Paula Watson Absent: Don Myers Staff Present: City Manager Troy Powell, Nan Pope, Serena Kauk, Matt Mueller, Randy Elliott, Cassie Sowers, Phil Stowell, Steve Lett, Daryl Golbek, Joe Kays, Gene Edwards, Tim Miller, Tamryn Cluck, Mark Dowler Pledge of Allegiance by all. Invocation by James Graham, Verdigris United Methodist Church. ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA Motion by Mullenger, second by Lehman that the agenda for the regular CPWA meeting of March 03, 2008, be approved as written. 8 yes, Mullenger, Lehman, Robertson, Guthrie, Shallenburger, Webber, Chase, Watson. ITEMS UNFORESEEN AT THE TIME AGENDA WAS POSTED None CALL TO THE PUBLIC None CURRENT BUSINESS Motion by Mullenger, second by Lehman to approve the following consent items: (a) Minutes of Claremore Public Works Authority meeting on February 18, 2008, as printed. (b) All claims as printed. (c) Approve budget supplement for upgrading the electric distribution system and adding an additional Substation for the new Oklahoma Plaza Development - $586,985 - Leasehold improvements to new project number assignment. (Serena Kauk) (d) Approve budget supplement for purchase of an additional concrete control house for new Substation #5 for Oklahoma Plaza Development - $93,946 - Leasehold improvements to new project number assignment. (Serena Kauk) (e) Approve budget supplement for electrical engineering contract with Ledbetter, Corner and Associates for engineering design phase for Substation #5 - Oklahoma Plaza Development - $198,488 - Leasehold improvements to new project number assignment.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual (Part B)
    7UDQVLW&DSDFLW\DQG4XDOLW\RI6HUYLFH0DQXDO PART 2 BUS TRANSIT CAPACITY CONTENTS 1. BUS CAPACITY BASICS ....................................................................................... 2-1 Overview..................................................................................................................... 2-1 Definitions............................................................................................................... 2-1 Types of Bus Facilities and Service ............................................................................ 2-3 Factors Influencing Bus Capacity ............................................................................... 2-5 Vehicle Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-5 Person Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-13 Fundamental Capacity Calculations .......................................................................... 2-15 Vehicle Capacity................................................................................................... 2-15 Person Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-22 Planning Applications ............................................................................................... 2-23 2. OPERATING ISSUES............................................................................................ 2-25 Introduction..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles Transportation Transit History – South LA
    Los Angeles Transportation Transit History – South LA Matthew Barrett Metro Transportation Research Library, Archive & Public Records - metro.net/library Transportation Research Library & Archive • Originally the library of the Los • Transportation research library for Angeles Railway (1895-1945), employees, consultants, students, and intended to serve as both academics, other government public outreach and an agencies and the general public. employee resource. • Partner of the National • Repository of federally funded Transportation Library, member of transportation research starting Transportation Knowledge in 1971. Networks, and affiliate of the National Academies’ Transportation • Began computer cataloging into Research Board (TRB). OCLC’s World Catalog using Library of Congress Subject • Largest transit operator-owned Headings and honoring library, forth largest transportation interlibrary loan requests from library collection after U.C. outside institutions in 1978. Berkeley, Northwestern University and the U.S. DOT’s Volpe Center. • Archive of Los Angeles transit history from 1873-present. • Member of Getty/USC’s L.A. as Subject forum. Accessing the Library • Online: metro.net/library – Library Catalog librarycat.metro.net – Daily aggregated transportation news headlines: headlines.metroprimaryresources.info – Highlights of current and historical documents in our collection: metroprimaryresources.info – Photos: flickr.com/metrolibraryarchive – Film/Video: youtube/metrolibrarian – Social Media: facebook, twitter, tumblr, google+,
    [Show full text]
  • Electric Trolleybuses for the Lacmta's Bus System
    ARIELI ASSOCIATES MANAGEMENT, OPERATIONS AND ENGINEERING CONSULTING Report No. 1302 ELECTRIC TROLLEYBUSES FOR THE LACMTA’S BUS SYSTEM PREPARED FOR THE ADVANCED TRANSIT VEHICLE CONSORTIUM UNDER CONTRACT NO. OP 3320661 - 2 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY California Air Resources Board (CARB) Adopted Urban Bus Transit Rule for 2010 Emission Standards requires that MTA, starting in 2010, set aside 15% of all bus purchases to acquire Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEVs). Currently, none of the buses in the MTA’s inventory can be classified as ZEV, nor there are any transit buses [defined as propelled by an internal combustion engine (ICE) powered by either diesel or alternate fuels] available on the market that can be classified as ZEV. The California emission standards are well ahead of those for the rest of the United States and the manufacturers will not develop suitable vehicles on their own unless incentivized by large customers such as LACMTA. Failure to meet the 2010 Emission Standards will result in regulatory punitive fines and potentially litigation. It is important to note here that this is not the first time that the subject of incorporating electric trolleybuses into the MTA’s bus system comes before the MTA Board of Directors. In the 1992 30-Year Integrated Transportation Plan, electric trolleybuses were the preferred solution to meet CARB air regulations. The Plan provided for 18 routes, 300 miles of overhead wires and 400 peak electric trolleybuses by 2004 to be increased to 1,100 peak electric trolleybuses by 2010. Eventually, the Board voted to terminate the project. After reviewing the various technologies that might qualify as zero emissions under CARB rule, the report focuses on electric trolleybuses as the technology of choice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neighborly Substation the Neighborly Substation Electricity, Zoning, and Urban Design
    MANHATTAN INSTITUTE CENTER FORTHE RETHINKING DEVELOPMENT NEIGHBORLY SUBstATION Hope Cohen 2008 er B ecem D THE NEIGHBORLY SUBstATION THE NEIGHBORLY SUBstATION Electricity, Zoning, and Urban Design Hope Cohen Deputy Director Center for Rethinking Development Manhattan Institute In 1879, the remarkable thing about Edison’s new lightbulb was that it didn’t burst into flames as soon as it was lit. That disposed of the first key problem of the electrical age: how to confine and tame electricity to the point where it could be usefully integrated into offices, homes, and every corner of daily life. Edison then designed and built six twenty-seven-ton, hundred-kilowatt “Jumbo” Engine-Driven Dynamos, deployed them in lower Manhattan, and the rest is history. “We will make electric light so cheap,” Edison promised, “that only the rich will be able to burn candles.” There was more taming to come first, however. An electrical fire caused by faulty wiring seriously FOREWORD damaged the library at one of Edison’s early installations—J. P. Morgan’s Madison Avenue brownstone. Fast-forward to the massive blackout of August 2003. Batteries and standby generators kicked in to keep trading alive on the New York Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ. But the Amex failed to open—it had backup generators for the trading-floor computers but depended on Consolidated Edison to cool them, so that they wouldn’t melt into puddles of silicon. Banks kept their ATM-control computers running at their central offices, but most of the ATMs themselves went dead. Cell-phone service deteriorated fast, because soaring call volumes quickly drained the cell- tower backup batteries.
    [Show full text]
  • BACK on TRACK Initiatives to Restore Rail Service to U.S
    BACK ON TRACK Initiatives to Restore Rail Service to U.S. Towns and Cities JOSEPH P. SCHWIETERMAN, PH.D. & JESSICA KUPETS LA Metro BR&W RR Historic Trust 2004-2020 CHADDICK INSTITUTE WORKING PAPER SEPTEMBER 29, 2020 BACK FROM ABANDONMENT: INITIATIVES TO RESTORE RAIL SERVICE TO U.S. TOWNS AND CITIES, 2004 - 2020 JOSEPH P. SCHWIETERMAN, PH.D. AND JESSICA KUPETS, DEPAUL UNIVERSITY - CHADDICK INSTITUTE FOR METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT SEATTLE SEATTLE BOSTON ­ PORTLAND ­ £ £ ­¤ ­­ ­ ¡ ­ ¢ £ ­­ BOSTON ­ ­ ­ ¢ CHICAGO NEW YORK SALT LAKE CITY ¡ ­ ­ ­ PHILADELPHIA DENVER RTD SAN FRANCISCO WASHINGTON ­­ ­ ­­ ­ LOS ANGELES ­ ­ ­ WASHINGTON ­ ­ LOS ANGELES ATLANTA ­ ­­ DALLAS ­ AUSTIN HOUSTON ORLANDO + # TAMPA ­ ­ ­ ­ MIAMI Back on Track - Summary of Findings Back on Track evaluates the extent and purpose of initiatives since 2004 that have restored rail service to communities across the U.S. mainland that previously lacked active rail lines. Using a variety of analytical tools, it identifies and categorizes initiatives to reactivate out-of-service routes, rebuild abandoned corridors, and create entirely new routes that reconnect municipalities to the rail
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Supplement to the Commercial Driver's
    www.dmvNow.com Virginia Department of Motor Vehicles Post Office Box 27412 Richmond, Virginia 23269-0001 (804) 497-7100 Please recycle. Virginia Supplement to the Commercial Driver License Manual This publication contains information that Virginia commercial motor vehicle operators must know, in addition to the information in the national standard CDL manual. Who are Commercial Drivers? Eligibility for a Commercial Permit or License Commercial drivers are all persons, paid or volunteer, who The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) operate commercial motor vehicles. Volunteer drivers of requires that applicants for a commercial driver’s license or church buses, private or public school buses and mechanics learner’s permit be either a U.S. citizen or a Legal Permanent who test drive commercial vehicles must meet commercial Resident of the U.S. As a result, you are required to present driver’s license requirements. one of the following to DMV when applying. If you previously presented one of these documents to DMV, you will not be Commercial driver’s license requirements don’t apply to: asked to present it for subsequent applications: operators of emergency vehicles, such as firefighters Valid, unexpired, U.S. passport active duty military personnel operating military vehicles Certified copy of a U.S. state, jurisdiction, or territory operators of farm vehicles when: Consular Report of Birth Abroad issued by the U.S. used by farmers Department of State used to move farm goods, supplies or machinery U.S. Certificate of Naturalization to or from their farm U.S. Certificate of Citizenship not used as a common or contract motor carrier, Valid, unexpired U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 1981 Caltrans Inventory of Pacific Electric Routes
    1981 Inventory of PACIFIC ELECTRIC ROUTES I J..,. I ~ " HE 5428 . red by I58 ANGELES - DISTRICT 7 - PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BRANCH rI P37 c.2 " ' archive 1981 INVENTORY OF PACIFIC ELECTRIC ROUTES • PREPARED BY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) DISTRICT 07 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION BRANCH FEBRUARY 1982 • TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Pacific Electric Railway Company Map 3a Inventory Map 3b II. NQR'I'HIRN AND EASTERN DISTRICTS 4 A. San Bernardino Line 6 B. Monrovia-Glendora Line 14 C. Alhambra-San Gabriel Line 19 D. Pasadena Short Line 21 E. Pasadena Oak Knoll Line 23 F. Sierra Madre Line 25 G. South Pasadena Line 27 H. North Lake Avenue Line 30 10 North Fair Oaks Avenue Line 31 J. East Colorado Street Line 32 K. Pomona-Upland Line 34 L. San Bernardino-Riverside Line 36 M. Riverside-Corona Line 41 III. WESTERN DISTRICT 45 A. Glendale-Burbank Line 47 B. Hollywood Line Segment via Hill Street 52 C. South Hollywood-Sherman Line 55 D. Subway Hollywood Line 58 i TABLE OF CONTENTS (Contd. ) -PAGE III. WESTERN DISTRICT (Conta. ) E. San Fernando valley Line 61 F. Hollywood-Venice Line 68 o. Venice Short Line 71 H. Santa Monica via Sawtelle Line 76 I. westgate Line 80 J. Santa Monica Air Line 84 K. Soldier's Home Branch Line 93 L. Redondo Beach-Del Rey Line 96 M. Inglewood Line 102 IV. SOUTHIRN DISTRICT 106 A. Long Beach Line 108 B. American Avenue-North Long Beach Line 116 c. Newport-Balboa Line 118 D. E1 Segundo Line 123 E. San Pedro via Dominguez Line 129 F.
    [Show full text]