Dalhousie Law Journal Volume 30 Issue 1 Article 5 4-1-2007 Habermas, Legal Legitimacy, and Creative Cost Awards in Recent Canadian Jurisprudence Michael Fenrick Dalhousie University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/dlj Part of the Courts Commons Recommended Citation Michael Fenrick, "Habermas, Legal Legitimacy, and Creative Cost Awards in Recent Canadian Jurisprudence" (2007) 30:1 Dal LJ 165. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Schulich Law Scholars. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dalhousie Law Journal by an authorized editor of Schulich Law Scholars. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Michael Fenrick* Habermas, Legal Legitimacy, and Creative Cost Awards in Recent Canadian Jurisprudence- Access to justice continues to be a live issue in Canadian courtrooms. While state-sponsored initiatives that promote access continue to flounder in Canada or in some cases, are cancelled altogether, the pressure is mounting to find creative solutions that facilitate greater participation in formal dispute resolution processes. The price of failing in this regard is very high. To truly flourish, both social cohesion and individual liberties require a more participatory and inclusive legal system than the one that currently precludes all but the wealthiest from accessing our courts. Drawing on the legal philosophy of Jargen Habermas, the author examines access problems from the perspective of the civil litigant who is facing the unmanageable financial burden of having her legal rights recognized and adjudicated in a Canadian courtroom. Specifically, this paper considers the role which creative costs orders can play in advancing the goal of fuller legal participation.