DOCSLIB.ORG

Members of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS Updated: August 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Members of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS Updated: August 2021 Members of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS Updated: August 2021 1. Albania 48. Faroe Islands 95. New Zealand 2. Andorra 49. Finland 96. Nigeria 3. Angola 50. France 97. North Macedonia 4. Anguilla 51. Gabon 98. Norway 5. Antigua and Barbuda 52. Georgia 99. Oman 6. Argentina 53. Germany 100. Pakistan 7. Armenia 54. Gibraltar 101. Panama 8. Aruba 55. Greece 102. Papua New Guinea 9. Australia 56. Greenland 103. Paraguay 10. Austria 57. Grenada 104. Peru 11. The Bahamas 58. Guernsey 105. Poland 12. Bahrain 59. Haiti 106. Portugal 13. Barbados 60. Honduras 107. Qatar 14. Belarus 61. Hong Kong, China 108. Romania 15. Belgium 62. Hungary 109. Russian Federation 16. Belize 63. Iceland 110. Saint Kitts and Nevis 17. Benin 64. India 111. Saint Lucia 18. Bermuda 65. Indonesia 112. Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 19. Bosnia and Herzegovina 66. Ireland 113. Samoa 20. Botswana 67. Isle of Man 114. San Marino 21. Brazil 68. Israel 115. Saudi Arabia 22. British Virgin Islands 69. Italy 116. Senegal 23. Brunei Darussalam 70. Jamaica 117. Serbia 24. Bulgaria 71. Japan 118. Seychelles 25. Burkina Faso 72. Jersey 119. Sierra Leone 26. Cabo Verde 73. Jordan 120. Singapore 27. Cameroon 74. Kazakhstan 121. Slovak Republic 28. Canada 75. Kenya 122. Slovenia 29. Cayman Islands 76. Korea 123. South Africa 30. Chile 77. Latvia 124. Spain 31. China (People’s Republic of) 78. Liberia 125. Sri Lanka 32. Colombia 79. Liechtenstein 126. Sweden 33. Congo 80. Lithuania 127. Switzerland 34. Cook Islands 81. Luxembourg 128. Thailand 35. Costa Rica 82. Macau, China 129. Togo 36. Côte d’Ivoire 83. Malaysia 130. Trinidad and Tobago 37. Croatia 84. Maldives 131. Tunisia 38. Curaçao 85. Malta 132. Turkey 39. Czech Republic 86. Mauritius 133. Turks and Caicos Islands 40. Democratic Republic of the Congo 87. Mexico 134. Ukraine 41. Denmark 88. Monaco 135. United Arab Emirates 42. Djibouti 89. Mongolia 136. United Kingdom 43. Dominica 90. Montenegro 137. United States 44. Dominican Republic 91. Montserrat 138. Uruguay 45. Egypt 92. Morocco 139. Viet Nam 46. Estonia 93. Namibia 140. Zambia 47. Eswatini 94. Netherlands For more information on the OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project, visit www.oecd.org/tax/beps/about 1 Membres du Cadre inclusif sur le BEPS de l’OCDE et du G20 Mise à jour : Août 2021 1. Afrique du sud 48. Etats-Unis 95. Monténégro 2. Albanie 49. Finlande 96. Montserrat 3. Allemagne 50. France 97. Namibie 4. Andorre 51. Gabon 98. Nigéria 5. Angola 52. Géorgie 99. Norvège 6. Anguilla 53. Gibraltar 100. Nouvelle-Zélande 7. Antigua-et-Barbuda 54. Grèce 101. Oman 8. Arabie saoudite 55. Grenade 102. Pakistan 9. Argentine 56. Groenland 103. Panama 10. Arménie 57. Guernesey 104. Papouasie Nouvelle Guinée 11. Aruba 58. Haïti 105. Paraguay 12. Australie 59. Honduras 106. Pays-Bas 13. Autriche 60. Hong Kong (Chine) 107. Pérou 14. Bahamas 61. Hongrie 108. Pologne 15. Bahreïn 62. Îles Caïmans 109. Portugal 16. Barbade 63. Îles Cook 110. Qatar 17. Belgique 64. Île de Man 111. République démocratique du Congo 18. Belize 65. Îles Féroé 112. République dominicaine 19. Bénin 66. Îles Turques et Caïques 113. République slovaque 20. Bermudes 67. Îles Vierges britanniques 114. République tchèque 21. Biélorussie 68. Inde 115. Roumanie 22. Bosnie-Herzégovine 69. Indonésie 116. Royaume-Uni 23. Botswana 70. Irlande 117. Russie 24. Brésil 71. Islande 118. Saint-Kitts-et-Nevis 25. Brunei Darussalam 72. Israël 119. Saint-Marin 26. Bulgarie 73. Italie 120. Sainte-Lucie 27. Burkina Faso 74. Jamaïque 121. Saint-Vincent-et-les-Grenadines 28. Cabo Verde 75. Japon 122. Samoa 29. Cameroun 76. Jersey 123. Sénégal 30. Canada 77. Jordanie 124. Serbie 31. Chili 78. Kazakhstan 125. Seychelles 32. Chine (République populaire de) 79. Kenya 126. Sierra Leone 33. Colombie 80. Lettonie 127. Singapour 34. Congo 81. Libéria 128. Slovénie 82. Liechtenstein 129. Sri Lanka 35. Corée 83. Lituanie 130. Suède 36. Costa Rica 84. Luxembourg 131. Suisse 37. Côte d’Ivoire 85. Macao (Chine) 132. Thaïlande 38. Croatie 86. Μacédoine du Nord 133. Togo 39. Curaçao 87. Malaisie 134. Trinité-et-Tobago 40. Danemark 88. Maldives 135. Tunisie 41. Djibouti 89. Malte 136. Turquie 42. Dominique 90. Maroc 137. Ukraine 43. Égypte 91. Maurice 138. Uruguay 44. Émirats Arabes Unis 92. Mexique 139. Viet Nam 45. Espagne 93. Monaco 140. Zambie 46. Estonie 94. Mongolie 47. Eswatini Pour plus d'informations sur le projet BEPS de l'OCDE et du G20, voir : www.oecd.org/fr/fiscalite/beps/ 3 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Net Zero by 2050 a Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector Net Zero by 2050
    Net Zero by 2050 A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector Net Zero by 2050 A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector Net Zero by 2050 Interactive iea.li/nzeroadmap Net Zero by 2050 Data iea.li/nzedata INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The IEA examines the IEA member IEA association full spectrum countries: countries: of energy issues including oil, gas and Australia Brazil coal supply and Austria China demand, renewable Belgium India energy technologies, Canada Indonesia electricity markets, Czech Republic Morocco energy efficiency, Denmark Singapore access to energy, Estonia South Africa demand side Finland Thailand management and France much more. Through Germany its work, the IEA Greece advocates policies Hungary that will enhance the Ireland reliability, affordability Italy and sustainability of Japan energy in its Korea 30 member Luxembourg countries, Mexico 8 association Netherlands countries and New Zealand beyond. Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic Spain Sweden Please note that this publication is subject to Switzerland specific restrictions that limit Turkey its use and distribution. The United Kingdom terms and conditions are available online at United States www.iea.org/t&c/ This publication and any The European map included herein are without prejudice to the Commission also status of or sovereignty over participates in the any territory, to the work of the IEA delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Source: IEA. All rights reserved. International Energy Agency Website: www.iea.org Foreword We are approaching a decisive moment for international efforts to tackle the climate crisis – a great challenge of our times.
    [Show full text]
  • Oecd Secretary-General Tax Report to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors
    OECD SECRETARY-GENERAL TAX REPORT TO G20 FINANCE MINISTERS AND CENTRAL BANK GOVERNORS Saudi Arabia July 2020 For more information: [email protected] www.oecd.org/tax @OECDtax | 1 OECD Secretary-General Tax Report to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors Saudi Arabia July 2020 PUBE 2 | This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. Please cite this report as: OECD (2020), OECD Secretary-General Tax Report to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors – July 2020, OECD, Paris. www.oecd.org/tax/oecd-secretary-general-tax-report-g20-finance-ministers-july-2020.pdf Note by Turkey The information in this document with reference to “Cyprus” relates to the southern part of the Island. There is no single authority representing both Turkish and Greek Cypriot people on the Island. Turkey recognises the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). Until a lasting and equitable solution is found within the context of the United Nations, Turkey shall preserve its position concerning the “Cyprus issue”. Note by all the European Union Member States of the OECD and the European Union The Republic of Cyprus is recognised by all members of the United Nations with the exception of Turkey. The information in this document relates to the area under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus.
    [Show full text]
  • FROM the G7 to a D-10: Strengthening Democratic Cooperation for Today’S Challenges
    FROM THE G7 TO THE D-10 : STRENGTHENING DEMOCRATIC COOPERATION FOR TODAY’S CHALLENGES FROM THE G7 TO A D-10: Strengthening Democratic Cooperation for Today’s Challenges Ash Jain and Matthew Kroenig (United States) With Tobias Bunde (Germany), Sophia Gaston (United Kingdom), and Yuichi Hosoya (Japan) ATLANTIC COUNCIL A Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security The Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security works to develop sustainable, nonpartisan strategies to address the most important security challenges facing the United States and the world. The Center honors General Brent Scowcroft’s legacy of service and embodies his ethos of nonpartisan commitment to the cause of security, support for US leadership in cooperation with allies and partners, and dedication to the mentorship of the next generation of leaders. Democratic Order Initiative This report is a product of the Scowcroft Center’s Democratic Order Initiative, which is aimed at reenergizing American global leadership and strengthening cooperation among the world’s democracies in support of a rules-based democratic order. The authors would like to acknowledge Joel Kesselbrenner, Jeffrey Cimmino, Audrey Oien, and Paul Cormarie for their efforts and contributions to this report. This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council and its donors do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s conclusions. © 2021 The Atlantic Council of the United States. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Atlantic Council, except in the case of brief quotations in news articles, critical articles, or reviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Educated. Empowered. Unleashed
    YOUNG AFRICA: Educated. Empowered. Unleashed. 6th -14th July 2019 tents About United World Colleges 3 About Waterford Kamhlaba United World College of Southern Africa 4 Welcome to UWC Africa week 2019 5 Past UWC Africa Week Speakers 7 Schedule of events 9 Tin Bucket Drum – The Musical 11 Past UWC Africa Week events in pictures 16 Con 2 About United World Colleges 3 About United World Colleges About Waterford Kamhlaba United World College of Southern Africa 4 nited World Colleges (UWC), is a global Today, over 9,500 students from over 150 countries Welcome to UWC Africa week 2019 5 education movement that makes education are studying on one of the UWC campuses. Over Past UWC Africa Week Speakers 7 Ua force to unite people, nations and cultures 65% of UWC students in their final two years receive Schedule of events 9 for peace and a sustainable future. It comprises a a full or partial scholarship, enabling admission to a network of 18 international schools and colleges UWC school to be independent of socio-economic Tin Bucket Drum – The Musical 11 on four continents, short courses and a system means. of volunteer-run national committees in 159 Past UWC Africa Week events in pictures 16 Since the foundation of the first UWC college in countries. 1962, UWC has inspired a network of more than UWC offers a challenging educational experience 60,000 alumni worldwide, who remain engaged to a deliberately diverse group of students and with the UWC movement and committed to places a high value on experiential learning, contribute to a more equitable and peaceful world.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-DOD Version INFORMATION ONLY – DO NOT USE to REPORT NSF Federal R&D Funds Survey (Non-DOD Version) – Volume 70 (Fys 2020–21)
    INFORMATION ONLY – DO NOT USE TO REPORT NSF Survey of Federal Funds for Research and Development Volume 70 (FYs 2020–21) Non-DOD version INFORMATION ONLY – DO NOT USE TO REPORT NSF Federal R&D Funds Survey (non-DOD version) – Volume 70 (FYs 2020–21) Instructions Data Collection Authority and Uses The legislation that established the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 (42 U.S. Code. 1862, P.L. 87-835) requires that NSF “…provide a central clearinghouse for the collection, interpretation, and analysis of data on scientific and engineering resources, and to provide a source of information for policy formulation by other agencies of the Federal Government...” This mandate was further codified in the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 §505, which requires NSF’s National Center for Science & Engineering Statistics to “collect, acquire, analyze, report, and disseminate… statistical data on (A) research and development trends…” The annual Survey of Federal Funds for Research and Development (Federal Funds Survey) is the primary source of information about federal funding for R&D in the United States. The results of the survey are also used in the calculation of Gross Domestic Product, for analysis in public policy and science policy, and for budget purposes of four federal programs: Federal Laboratory Consortium for Technology Transfer, Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR), Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR), and Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR). The survey is sponsored by the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES) within the National Science Foundation (NSF). Before You Start In FYs 2020 and 2021, a series of supplemental appropriations bills were passed, starting in March 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: the Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2020 (H.R.
    [Show full text]
  • G7 to G8 to G20: Evolution in Global Governance CIGI G20 Papers | No
    G7 TO G8 TO G20: EVOLUTION IN GLOBAL GOVERNANCE CIGI G20 PAPERS | NO. 6, MAY 2011 Gordon S. Smith G7 TO G8 TO G20: EVOLUTION IN GLOBAL GOVERNANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY Summary 3 This paper provides a brief history of the evolution of Acronyms 3 the Group of Seven (G7) from its origins in the aftermath of the 1971 breakdown of the Bretton Woods system of G7 to G8 to G20: Evolution in Global Governance 4 exchange rates and the oil crisis in 1973. It then discusses Russia’s participation at summits after the fall of the Works Cited 8 Berlin Wall, formally joining the group in 1997, thus becoming the Group of Eight (G8). The paper gives a CIGI G20 Resources 9 concise account of the formation of the Group of Twenty About CIGI 10 (G20) finance ministers and central bank governors in the late 1990s, in the wake of financial crises in Asia and Latin America, which was elevated to a leaders’ summit forum at the outbreak of the global financial crisis in 2008. The paper wraps up with a discussion of the differences in the G8 and G20 models, concluding that the G20 process is still the best option for meeting the challenges of complex global governance issues. ACRONYMS 3G Global Governance Group ASEAN Association of Southeast Asian Nations AU African Union BMENA Afghanistan, the Broader Middle East and North Africa CFGS Centre for Global Studies G5 Group of Five G7 Group of Seven G8 Group of Eight G20 Group of Twenty IMF International Monetary Fund Copyright © 2011 The Centre for International Governance Innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between MNE Tax Haven Use and FDI Into Developing Economies Characterized by Capital Flight
    1 The relationship between MNE tax haven use and FDI into developing economies characterized by capital flight By Ali Ahmed, Chris Jones and Yama Temouri* The use of tax havens by multinationals is a pervasive activity in international business. However, we know little about the complementary relationship between tax haven use and foreign direct investment (FDI) in the developing world. Drawing on internalization theory, we develop a conceptual framework that explores this relationship and allows us to contribute to the literature on the determinants of tax haven use by developed-country multinationals. Using a large, firm-level data set, we test the model and find a strong positive association between tax haven use and FDI into countries characterized by low economic development and extreme levels of capital flight. This paper contributes to the literature by adding an important dimension to our understanding of the motives for which MNEs invest in tax havens and has important policy implications at both the domestic and the international level. Keywords: capital flight, economic development, institutions, tax havens, wealth extraction 1. Introduction Multinational enterprises (MNEs) from the developed world own different types of subsidiaries in increasingly complex networks across the globe. Some of the foreign host locations are characterized by light-touch regulation and secrecy, as well as low tax rates on financial capital. These so-called tax havens have received widespread media attention in recent years. In this paper, we explore the relationship between tax haven use and foreign direct investment (FDI) in developing countries, which are often characterized by weak institutions, market imperfections and a propensity for significant capital flight.
    [Show full text]
  • G20/OECD Effective Approaches for Implementing the G20/OECD High-Level Principles on SME Financing
    G20/OECD Effective Approaches for Implementing the G20/OECD High-Level Principles on SME Financing July 2018 At their Summit in Antalya in November 2015, G20 Leaders welcomed and agreed on the G20/OECD High-Level Principles on SME Financing, recognising the importance of improving SME access to finance. In their 2015 Antalya Action Plan (and in 2016), G20 Leaders expressed their intention to continue to work on identifying effective approaches to facilitate their implementation. G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors expressed support for the implementation of the Principles at their meetings in Shanghai on 27 February 2016, in Washington on 15 April 2016, and in Chengdu on 24 July 2016. This document contains the final report on Effective Approaches for Implementing the G20/OECD High Level Principles on SME Financing. It is transmitted to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors. The report has benefited from comments received from the OECD Working Party on SMEs and Entrepreneurship during its meetings in April 2017, October 2017 and April 2018, and from the G20/OECD Task Force on Institutional Investors and Long-Term Financing during its meetings in May 2017 and May 2018, and through written procedure in October 2017. Comments on Principle 7 were also received from the OECD International Network on Financial Education during its Technical Committee meeting in November 2017 and under written procedure in 2018. A draft final report was discussed during a joint meeting of the OECD Working Party on SMEs and Entrepreneurship and the G20/OECD Task Force on Institutional Investors and Long-Term Financing on 23 May 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia's Strategic Participation in the Group of 20 for Global Economic
    ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration Asia’s Strategic Participation in the Group of 20 for Global Economic Governance Reform: From the Perspective of International Trade Taeho Bark and Moonsung Kang No. 74 | February 2011 ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration Economic Governance Reform: From the Perspective of International Trade Taeho Bark+ and Moonsung Kang++ The original draft of this paper was prepared for the conference “Reshaping Global Economic Governance No. 74 February 2011 and the Role of Asia in G20,” organized by the Asian Development Bank and the Peterson Institute for International Economics, and supported by the Persidential Committee for the G20 Summit, Seoul, Replublic of Korea, 25–26 October 2010. The paper is funded by RDTA 7501 Asia’s Strategic Participation in the Group of Twenty for Global Economic Governance Reform. +Professor, Graduate School of International Studies, Seoul National University, Republic of Korea. thbark@ snu.ac.kr ++Professor, Division of International Studies, Korea University, Republic of Korea. [email protected]. The ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration focuses on topics relating to regional cooperation and integration in the areas of infrastructure and software, trade and investment, money and finance, and regional public goods. The Series is a quick-disseminating, informal publication that seeks to provide information, generate discussion, and elicit comments. Working papers published under this Series may subsequently be published elsewhere. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) or its Board of Governors or the governments they represent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Group of Twenty (G20) : Setting the Global Agenda
    Briefing January 2015 The Group of Twenty (G20) Setting the global agenda SUMMARY The Group of Twenty (G20) is an informal forum for international cooperation, and consists of 19 major economies plus the European Union. It gained in prominence in 2008 – when regular summits at the level of leaders commenced – taking on the role of 'global crisis management committee'. While the majority of observers argue that the G20 did remarkably well to contain the financial and economic crisis in 2008 and 2009, it has been less successful in finding consensus and making progress on its agenda since the urgency and immediate pressures diminished. The outcomes of recent summits have therefore been rather modest, if not disappointing. The gap between agreed commitments and their implementation varies across policy areas and member countries but, for many observers, threatens to undermine the G20's credibility. The assessment of G20 policies remains mixed as its achievements are often accompanied by stalled progress and failure to implement. However, there are limits as to what can be accomplished due to the G20's voluntary rather than legal character, and lack of a formal enforcement mechanism. The G20 and the EU have the potential to mutually advance their agendas. The EU is strongly represented in the G20 which, according to some, gives it some influence on the G20's agenda. At the same time G20 commitments have had substantial impact on Europe's reforms of its financial sector. The November 2014 Brisbane summit was hailed as a success by the leaders, whereas the view of commentators was more mixed.
    [Show full text]
  • Unhcr > Global Trends 2018
    2018 IN REVIEW Trends at a Glance The global population of forcibly displaced increased by 2.3 million people in 2018. By the end of the year, almost 70.8 million individuals were forcibly displaced worldwide as a result of persecution, conflict, violence, or human rights violations. As a result, the world’s forcibly displaced population remained yet again at a record high. MILLION FORCIBLY as a result of persecution, DISplacED 70.8 WORLDwiDE conflict, violence, or human rights violations at end-2018 25.9 million refugees 20.4 million refugees under UNHCR’s mandate 5.5 million Palestine refugees under UNRWA’s mandate 41.3 million internally displaced people1 3.5 million asylum-seekers 37,000 13.6 MILLION NEW DISPLACEMENTS NEWLY DISPLACED EVERY Day 4 IN 5 An estimated 13.6 million people The number of new displacements Nearly 4 out of every 5 refugees were newly displaced due to conflict was equivalent to an average of lived in countries neighbouring their or persecution in 2018. 37,000 people being forced to flee countries of origin. This included 10.8 million individuals their homes every day in 2018. displaced2 within the borders of their own country and 2.8 million new 1 Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre refugees and new asylum-seekers. of the Norwegian Refugee Council. 2 Ibid. 3 The number of new individual asylum applications for Turkey does not include Syrian 3.5 nationals who receive protection under the MILLION Temporary Protection Regulation and relates 16% to applications submitted to UNCHR until 10 September 2018, when the government ASYLUM-SEEKERS assumed full responsibility for registration and Countries in developed regions refugee status determination.
    [Show full text]
  • JNR0120SE Globalprofile.Pdf
    JOURNAL OF NURSING REGULATION VOLUME 10 · SPECIAL ISSUE · JANUARY 2020 THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF STATE BOARDS OF NURSING JOURNAL Volume 10 Volume OF • Special Issue Issue Special NURSING • January 2020 January REGULATION Advancing Nursing Excellence for Public Protection A Global Profile of Nursing Regulation, Education, and Practice National Council of State Boards of Nursing Pages 1–116 Pages JOURNAL OFNURSING REGULATION Official publication of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing Editor-in-Chief Editorial Advisory Board Maryann Alexander, PhD, RN, FAAN Mohammed Arsiwala, MD MT Meadows, DNP, RN, MS, MBA Chief Officer, Nursing Regulation President Director of Professional Practice, AONE National Council of State Boards of Nursing Michigan Urgent Care Executive Director, AONE Foundation Chicago, Illinois Livonia, Michigan Chicago, Illinois Chief Executive Officer Kathy Bettinardi-Angres, Paula R. Meyer, MSN, RN David C. Benton, RGN, PhD, FFNF, FRCN, APN-BC, MS, RN, CADC Executive Director FAAN Professional Assessment Coordinator, Washington State Department of Research Editors Positive Sobriety Institute Health Nursing Care Quality Allison Squires, PhD, RN, FAAN Adjunct Faculty, Rush University Assurance Commission Brendan Martin, PhD Department of Nursing Olympia, Washington Chicago, Illinois NCSBN Board of Directors Barbara Morvant, MN, RN President Shirley A. Brekken, MS, RN, FAAN Regulatory Policy Consultant Julia George, MSN, RN, FRE Executive Director Baton Rouge, Louisiana President-elect Minnesota Board of Nursing Jim Cleghorn, MA Minneapolis, Minnesota Ann L. O’Sullivan, PhD, CRNP, FAAN Treasurer Professor of Primary Care Nursing Adrian Guerrero, CPM Nancy J. Brent, MS, JD, RN Dr. Hildegarde Reynolds Endowed Term Area I Director Attorney At Law Professor of Primary Care Nursing Cynthia LaBonde, MN, RN Wilmette, Illinois University of Pennsylvania Area II Director Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Lori Scheidt, MBA-HCM Sean Clarke, RN, PhD, FAAN Area III Director Executive Vice Dean and Professor Pamela J.
    [Show full text]