Spatial and Phylogenetic Structure of Alpine Stonefly Community

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Spatial and Phylogenetic Structure of Alpine Stonefly Community bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/765578; this version posted April 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 2 3 Spatial and phylogenetic structure of Alpine stonefly community assemblages across 4 seven habitats using DNA-species 5 6 Maribet Gamboa1, Joeselle Serrana1, Yasuhiro Takemon2, Michael T. Monaghan3,4, Kozo 7 Watanabe1,5 8 9 10 1Ehime University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Matsuyama, Japan 11 12 2Water Resources Research Center, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, 13 6110011 Gokasho, Uji, Japan 14 15 3Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Müggelseedamm 301, 16 12587 Berlin, Germany 17 18 4Institut für Biologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Str. 1-3, 14195 Berlin, Germany 19 20 5Ehime University, Center Marine Environmental Studies (CMES), Matsuyama, Japan 21 22 23 24 25 26 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/765578; this version posted April 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 27 Abstract 28 1. Stream ecosystems are spatially heterogeneous, with many different habitat patches 29 distributed within a small area. The influence of this heterogeneity on the biodiversity of 30 benthic insect communities is well documented; however, studies of the role of habitat 31 heterogeneity in species coexistence and community assembly remain limited. Here, we 32 asked how habitat heterogeneity influences spatial structure (beta biodiversity) and 33 phylogenetic structure (evolutionary processes) of benthic stonefly (Plecoptera, Insecta) 34 communities. 35 2. We sampled 20 sites along two Alpine rivers, including seven habitats in four different 36 reaches (headwaters, meandering, bar-braided floodplain, and lowland spring-fed). We 37 identified 21 morphological species and delineated 52 DNA-species based on sequences 38 from mitochondrial cox1 and nuclear ITS markers. Using DNA-species, we first analysed 39 the patterns of variation in richness, diversity, and composition by quantifing the 40 contribution of each of the four reaches and seven habitats to the overall DNA-species 41 diversity using an additive partition of species diversity analysis and distance-based 42 redundancy analysis. Using gene-tree phylogenies, we assessed whether environmental 43 filtering led to the co-occurrence of DNA-species using a two-step analysis to find a 44 phylogenetic signal. 45 3. The four reaches significantly contributed to DNA-species richness; with the meandering 46 section displaying the highest contribution. However, we found that habitats had an effect 47 on DNA-species diversity, where glide, riffle, and pool influenced the spatial structure of 48 stonefly communities possibly due to a high species turnover. 49 4. Among the habitats, the pool showed significant phylogenetic clustering, suggesting high 50 levels of evolutionary adaptation and strong habitat filtering. This community structure may 51 be caused by long-term stability of the habitat and the similar requirements for co-ocurring 52 species. 53 5. Our study shows the importance of different habitats on the spatial and phylogenetic 54 structure of stonefly community assemblies and sheds light on the habitat-specific diversity 55 that may help improve conservation practices. 56 57 58 KEYWORDS 59 DNA-species, habitats, spatial structure, phylogenetic structure, Plecoptera 60 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/765578; this version posted April 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 61 1. INTRODUCTION 62 63 Understanding species diversity patterns and processes governing species coexistence in a 64 community is one of the fundamental research objectives in ecology and biodiversity. The 65 development of effective and suitable biodiversity conservation strategies requires knowledge 66 of the processes driving community variation (Socolar, Gilroy, Kunin, & Edwards, 2016) along 67 temporal and spatial gradients (Anderson et al., 2011). Habitat specialisation is known to 68 influence changes in community composition along temporal and spatial gradients (e.g., Wiens 69 et al., 2010); however, this change depends on the degree of specialisation of the species 70 within a community (Rádková et al. 2014). 71 Stream ecosystems provide one of the most heterogeneous landscapes, given the 72 dynamic interaction between spatial elements (e.g., topography) and ecological process (e.g., 73 hydrology) (Benda et al., 2004; Tockner & Stanford, 2002). This interaction creates a variety of 74 different habitats throughout the longitudinal (upstream-downstream) gradient of the river, 75 classified as lotic (running water) and lentic (standing water) (Dobson & Frid, 1998; Calow & 76 Petts, 1996; Hauer & Lamberti, 1996). At the biogeographic scale, habitat heterogeneity in a 77 river channel defines environmental patches that impact aquatic community composition and 78 species distribution (Brasil, Da Silva, Batista, Olivera, & Ramos, 2017; Dias-Silva, Cabetter, 79 Juen, & De Marco, 2013); while at the local scale, creates environmental filtering to sort species 80 with similar requirements (Saito, Cianciaruso, Siqueira, Fonseca-Gessner, & Povoine, 2016; 81 Mykra, Heino, &, Muotka, 2007; Webb, Ackerly, McPeek, & Donoghue, 2002). Aquatic insects 82 are abundant, diverse, and broadly distributed (Lancaster & Downes, 2013). Many studies have 83 reported a strong positive relationship between aquatic insects species diversity and spatial 84 habitat heterogeneity (e.g. Astorga et al., 2014; Karaus, Larsen, Guillong, & Tockner, 2013; 85 Arscott, Tockner, & Ward, 2005; Benda et al., 2004; Batista, Buss, Dorville, & Nessimian, 2001), 86 however, these were only based on one spatial scale, where the relationship between assembly 87 process on both biogeographical and local scales remains limited to a few studies. Thus, 88 understanding local trends in biodiversity is crucial to describe the interaction between habitat 89 and species diversity at different scales. 90 One of the challenges in biodiversity research is that of species delimitation. Due to 91 limitations in taxonomic expertise and incomplete descriptions of taxonomic groups, many 92 species may remain unidentified or unclassified (Bickford et al., 2007), making it difficult to 93 describe local biodiversity. Genetic methods developed over the last decade have helped with 94 species identifications and the clarification of species boundaries of a wide range of taxa, 95 including aquatic insects (e.g., Gamboa & Arrivillaga-Henriquez, 2019; Serrana, Miyake, 96 Gamboa, & Watanabe, 2019; Gattoliatt, Rutschmann, Monaghan, & Sartori, 2018). The 97 Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent model (GMYC; Pons et al., 2006) is a method commonly 98 used to inditify putative DNA-species, by quantifying the transition between inter- and intra- 99 species branching events on an ultrametric tree (i.e., where the distance from the root of every 100 branch is equal), using molecular markers, such as mitochondrial DNA (Fujisawa & bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/765578; this version posted April 27, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 101 Barraclough, 2013; Mynott, Webb, & Suter, 2011), or based on the congruency between 102 mitochondrial and nuclear DNA (Rutschmann et al., 2016). 103 Stream ecologists have reported that local environmental heterogeneity may be the 104 strongest driver of community assembly patterns using putative DNA-species diversity of 105 aquatic insects along the river (Astorga et al., 2014; Baselga et al., 2013; Finn, Bonada, Múrria, 106 & Hughes, 2011). However, the majority of these observations is based on DNA-species 107 diversity changes along the river’s longitudinal gradient (Finn, Zamora-Muñoz, Múrria, Sáinz- 108 Bariáin, & Alba-Tercedor, 2013; Gill, Harrington, Kondratieff, Zamudio, Poff, & Funk, 2013; 109 Jackson, Battle, White, Pilgrim, Stein, Miller, & Sweeney, 2013; Finn et al., 2011; Finn & LeRoy 110 Poff, 2011; Hughes, Schmidt, & Finn, 2009), where the influence of other river dimensions (e.g., 111 habitats), has only been described in few species, such as beetles (Ribera & Vogler, 2008) or 112 caddisflies (Marten, Brandle, & Brandl, 2006). Therefore, investigating variations in spatial 113 patterns of aquatic insects community composition using DNA-species in the river channel and 114 their relationship with habitat heterogeneity will help to improve the understanding of the 115 process of community assembly in aquatic ecosystems. 116 The understanding of the community assembly not only has focused on spatial patterns 117 and composition changes analysis. The phylogenetic signal has been proposed as an 118 additional insight to understand the drivers of community
Recommended publications
  • Annual Newsletter and Bibliography of the International Society of Plecopterologists PERLA NO. 28, 2010
    PERLA Annual Newsletter and Bibliography of The International Society of Plecopterologists Pteronarcella regularis (Hagen), Mt. Shasta City Park, California, USA. Photograph by Bill P. Stark PERLA NO. 28, 2010 Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 USA PERLA Annual Newsletter and Bibliography of the International Society of Plecopterologists Available on Request to the Managing Editor MANAGING EDITOR: Boris C. Kondratieff Department of Bioagricultural Sciences And Pest Management Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 USA E-mail: [email protected] EDITORIAL BOARD: Richard W. Baumann Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum Brigham Young University Provo, Utah 84602 USA E-mail: [email protected] J. Manuel Tierno de Figueroa Dpto. de Biología Animal Facultad de Ciencias Universidad de Granada 18071 Granada, SPAIN E-mail: [email protected] Kenneth W. Stewart Department of Biological Sciences University of North Texas Denton, Texas 76203, USA E-mail: [email protected] Shigekazu Uchida Aichi Institute of Technology 1247 Yagusa Toyota 470-0392, JAPAN E-mail: [email protected] Peter Zwick Schwarzer Stock 9 D-36110 Schlitz, GERMANY E-mail: [email protected] 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Subscription policy……………………………………………………………………….4 Publication of the Proceedings of the International Joint Meeting on Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera 2008…………………………………….………………….………….…5 Ninth North American Plecoptera Symposium………………………………………….6
    [Show full text]
  • In Baltic Amber 85
    Overview and descriptions of fossil stoneflies (Plecoptera) in Baltic amber 85 Entomologie heute 22 (2010): 85-97 Overview and Descriptions of Fossil Stoneflies (Plecoptera) in Baltic Amber Übersicht und Beschreibungen von fossilen Steinfliegen (Plecoptera) im Baltischen Bernstein CELESTINE CARUSO & WILFRIED WICHARD Summary: Three new fossil species of stoneflies (Plecoptera: Nemouridae and Leuctridae) from Eocene Baltic amber are being described: Zealeuctra cornuta n. sp., Lednia zilli n. sp., and Podmosta attenuata n. sp.. Extant species of these three genera are found in Eastern Asia and in the Nearctic region. It is very probably that the genera must have been widely spread across the northern hemisphere in the Cretaceous period, before Europe was an archipelago in Eocene. The current state of knowledge about the seventeen Plecoptera species of Baltic amber is shortly presented. Due to discovered homonymies, the following nomenclatural corrections are proposed: Leuctra fusca Pictet, 1856 in Leuctra electrofusca Caruso & Wichard, 2010 and Nemoura affinis Berendt, 1856 in Nemoura electroaffinis Caruso & Wichard, 2010. Keywords: Fossil insects, fossil Plecoptera, Eocene, paleobiogeography Zusammenfassung: In dieser Arbeit werden drei neue fossile Steinfliegen-Arten (Plecoptera: Nemouridae und Leuctridae) des Baltischen Bernsteins beschrieben: Zealeuctra cornuta n. sp., Lednia zilli n. sp., Podmosta attenuata n. sp.. Rezente Arten der drei Gattungen sind in Ostasien und in der nearktischen Region nachgewiesen. Sehr wahrscheinlich breiteten sich die Gattungen in der Krei- dezeit über die nördliche Hemisphäre aus, noch bevor Europa im Eozän ein Archipel war. Der gegenwärtige Kenntnisstand über die siebzehn Plecoptera Arten des Baltischen Bernsteins wird kurz dargelegt. Wegen bestehender Homonymien werden folgende nomenklatorische Korrekturen vorgenommen: Leuctra fusca Pictet, 1856 in Leuctra electrofusca Caruso & Wichard, 2010 und Nemoura affinis Berendt, 1856 in Nemoura electroaffinis Caruso & Wichard, 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Newsletter and Bibliography of the International Society of Plecopterologists
    PERLA Annual Newsletter and Bibliography of The International Society of Plecopterologists Capnia valhalla Nelson & Baumann (Capniidae), ♂. California: San Diego Co. Palomar Mountain, Fry Creek. Photograph by C. R. Nelson PERLA NO. 30, 2012 Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 USA PERLA Annual Newsletter and Bibliography of the International Society of Plecopterologists Available on Request to the Managing Editor MANAGING EDITOR: Boris C. Kondratieff Department of Bioagricultural Sciences And Pest Management Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 USA E-mail: [email protected] EDITORIAL BOARD: Richard W. Baumann Department of Biology and Monte L. Bean Life Science Museum Brigham Young University Provo, Utah 84602 USA E-mail: [email protected] J. Manuel Tierno de Figueroa Dpto. de Biología Animal Facultad de Ciencias Universidad de Granada 18071 Granada, SPAIN E-mail: [email protected] Kenneth W. Stewart Department of Biological Sciences University of North Texas Denton, Texas 76203, USA E-mail: [email protected] Shigekazu Uchida Aichi Institute of Technology 1247 Yagusa Toyota 470-0392, JAPAN E-mail: [email protected] Peter Zwick Schwarzer Stock 9 D-36110 Schlitz, GERMANY E-mail: [email protected] 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Subscription policy………………………………………………………..…………….4 2012 XIIIth International Conference on Ephemeroptera, XVIIth International Symposium on Plecoptera in JAPAN…………………………………………………………………………………...5 How to host
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial and Phylogenetic Structure of DNA-Species of Alpine Stonefly
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/765578; this version posted September 11, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Spatial and phylogenetic structure of DNA-species of Alpine stonefly community 2 assemblages across seven habitats 3 4 Maribet Gamboa1, Joeselle Serrana1, Yasuhiro Takemon2, Michael T. Monaghan3, Kozo 5 Watanabe1 6 7 8 1Ehime University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Matsuyama, Japan 9 10 2Water Resources Research Center, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, 11 6110011 Gokasho, Uji, Japan 12 13 3Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB), Mueggelseedamm 301, 14 12587 Berlin, Germany 15 16 17 18 19 Correspondence 20 Kozo Watanabe, Ehime University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 21 Matsuyama, Japan. E-mail: [email protected] 22 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/765578; this version posted September 11, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 23 Abstract 24 1. Stream ecosystems are spatially heterogeneous environments due to the habitat diversity 25 that define different microhabitat patches within a single area. Despite the influence of 26 habitat heterogeneity on the biodiversity of insect community, little is known about how 27 habitat heterogeneity governs species coexistence and community assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Refining Biological Monitoring of Hydromorphological Change in River Channels Using Benthic Riverfly Larvae (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera)
    Refining biological monitoring of hydromorphological change in river channels using benthic riverfly larvae (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera). Anna Doeser November 2016 Submitted to Biological and Environmental Sciences School of Natural Sciences University of Stirling Scotland. For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Supervisor: Prof. Nigel Willby 1 Statement of Originality I hereby confirm that this PhD thesis is an original piece of work conducted independently by the undersigned and all work contained herein has not been submitted for any other degree. All research material has been duly acknowledged and cited. Signature of Candidate: Anna Doeser Date 2 General Abstract Rivers and their catchments are under mounting pressure from direct channel modification, intensification of land use, and from a legacy of decades of channelisation. Recent legislation, in the form of the EU Water Framework Directive, places a greater emphasis on the management of water bodies as holistic systems, and includes the explicit consideration of hydromorphological quality, which describes the hydrologic and geomorphic elements of river habitats. These are defined specifically as hydrological regime, river continuity and river morphology. This appreciates that sediment and flow regimes, along with the channel structure, provides the 'template' on which stream ecological structure and function is built. Invertebrate fauna contribute significantly to the biodiversity of rivers, and often form the basis of monitoring river health. However much of the fundamental ecological knowledge base on the response of invertebrates to hydromorphological change needed to make informed decisions and accurate predictions, is either lacking, inadequate or contradictory. This thesis addresses some of the key potential shortcomings in recent bio-assessment that others have alluded to, but which have rarely been explored in the context of direct channel manipulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Mt Donna Buang Wingless Stonefly
    Action Statement FloraFlora and and Fauna Fauna Guarantee Guarantee Act Act 1988 1988 No. No. ### 125 Mount Donna Buang Wingless Stonefly Riekoperla darlingtoni Description and Distribution The Mount Donna Buang Wingless Stonefly, Riekoperla darlingtoni (Illies 1968) is a cryptic insect belonging to the Family Gripopterygidae in the Order Plecoptera (stoneflies). Members of this order are distinguished from other insects by their long cerci and the absence of a median tail filament. The adult Mount Donna Buang Wingless Stonefly is brown, with darker markings on the thorax (Illies 1968), and has a body length of about 12 mm, with antennae about 8 mm and cerci about 3 mm (slightly less in females) (Neumann & Morey 1984). The nymph (the sub-adult aquatic stage) resembles the adult in form, but is smaller (Neumann & Morey 1984) and has a terminal gill tuft. Aquatic immature stages and poor powers of dispersal mean that they are only found near Mount Donna Buang Wingless Stonefly freshwater. (Harvey & Yen 1989). Although adults Riekoperla darlingtoni (male) [illustration from of the majority of Australian stonefly taxa have Illies (1968)] two pairs of well-developed wings (CSIRO 1991), the ‘wings’ of this taxon are present only as tiny flaps (Illies 1968) which preclude flight and, no doubt, further limit dispersal. Despite searches of a number of mountain forest habitats in Victoria and New South Wales (Illies 1968, Hynes 1974a), the taxon is known only from the vicinity of Mount Donna Buang, near Warburton, in the Victorian Central Highlands. Since discovery of the stonefly at Mount Donna Buang in 1931, all specimens had apparently been collected within about 1km of the summit (Hynes 1974a, Neumann & Morey 1984).
    [Show full text]
  • Bollettino Della Società Entomologica Italiana
    BOLL.ENTOMOL_152_3_cover.qxp_Layout 1 14/12/20 10:43 Pagina a Poste Italiane S.p.A. ISSN 0373-3491 Spedizione in % Abbonamento Postale - 70 DCB Genova BOLLETTINO DELLA SOCIETÀ ENTOMOLOGICA ITALIANA Volume 152 Fascicolo III settembre - dicembre 2020 31 dicembre 2020 SOCIETÀ ENTOMOLOGICA ITALIANA via Brigata Liguria 9 Genova BOLL.ENTOMOL_152_3_cover.qxp_Layout 1 14/12/20 10:43 Pagina b SOCIETÀ ENTOMOLOGICA ITALIANA Sede di Genova, via Brigata Liguria, 9 presso il Museo Civico di Storia Naturale n Consiglio Direttivo 2018-2020 Presidente: Francesco Pennacchio Vice Presidente: Roberto Poggi Segretario: Davide Badano Amministratore/Tesoriere: Giulio Gardini Bibliotecario: Antonio Rey Direttore delle Pubblicazioni: Pier Mauro Giachino Consiglieri: Alberto Alma, Alberto Ballerio, Andrea Battisti, Marco A. Bologna, Achille Casale, Marco Dellacasa, Loris Galli, Gianfranco Liberti, Bruno Massa, Massimo Meregalli, Luciana Tavella, Stefano Zoia Revisori dei Conti: Enrico Gallo, Giuliano Lo Pinto Revisori dei Conti supplenti: Giovanni Tognon, Marco Terrile n Consulenti Editoriali PAOLO AUDISIO (Roma) - EMILIO BALLETTO (Torino) - MAURIZIO BIONDI (L’Aquila) - MARCO A. BOLOGNA (Roma) PIETRO BRANDMAYR (Cosenza) - ROMANO DALLAI (Siena) - MARCO DELLACASA (Calci, Pisa) - ERNST HEISS (Innsbruck) - MANFRED JÄCH (Wien) - FRANCO MASON (Verona) - LUIGI MASUTTI (Padova) - ALESSANDRO MINELLI (Padova) - JOSÉ M. SALGADO COSTAS (Leon) - VALERIO SBORDONI (Roma) - BARBARA KNOFLACH-THALER (Innsbruck) STEFANO TURILLAZZI (Firenze) - ALBERTO ZILLI (Londra) - PETER ZWICK (Schlitz). ISSN 0373-3491 BOLLETTINO DELLA SOCIETÀ ENTOMOLOGICA ITALIANA Fondata nel 1869 - Eretta a Ente Morale con R. Decreto 28 Maggio 1936 Volume 152 Fascicolo III settembre - dicembre 2020 31 dicembre 2020 REGISTRATO PRESSO IL TRIBUNALE DI GENOVA AL N. 76 (4 LUGLIO 1949) Prof. Achille Casale - Direttore Responsabile Spedizione in Abbonamento Postale 70% - Quadrimestrale Pubblicazione a cura di PAGEPress - Via A.
    [Show full text]
  • High Cryptic Diversity in Aquatic Insects: an Integrative Approach to Study the Enigmatic Leuctra Inermis Species Group (Plecoptera)
    75 (3): 497– 521 20.12.2017 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2017. High cryptic diversity in aquatic insects: an integrative approach to study the enigmatic Leuctra inermis species group (Plecoptera) Simon Vitecek *, 1, 4, #, Gilles Vinçon 2, #, Wolfram Graf 3 & Steffen U. Pauls 4 1 Department for Limnology and Bio-Oceanography, Universität Wien, UZA I, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria; Simon Vitecek [simon. [email protected]] — 2 55 Bd Joseph Vallier, F 38100 Grenoble, France; Gilles Vinçon [[email protected]] — 3 Institute of Hydrobio- logy and Aquatic Ecology Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Straße 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria; Wolfram Graf [[email protected]] — 4 Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Steffen U. Pauls [[email protected]] — * Corresponding author; # Equally contributing authors Accepted 05.x.2017. Published online at www.senckenberg.de/arthropod-systematics on 11.xii.2017. Editors in charge: Gavin Svenson & Klaus-Dieter Klass Abstract Within the genus Leuctra (Plecoptera: Leuctridae) the L. inermis species group comprises 17 – 18 species in which males lack the char- acteristic tergal abdominal ornamentation of many Leuctra species, and females have an accessory receptacle in the dorsal portion of the vagina. Taxonomically the group is challenging, and congruence of existing morphological species concepts and phylogenetic relationships of taxa is hitherto not assessed. Here, we estimate phylogenetic relations of morphologically defined species by concatenated maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian combined species tree and species delimitation analysis. We aim to clarify the status of 15 European species of the L.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Report 12.8MB .Pdf File
    Museum Victoria Science Reports 8: 1–171 (2006) ISSN 1833-0290 https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mvsr.2006.08 Distribution maps for aquatic insects from Victorian rivers and streams: Ephemeropteran and Plecopteran nymphs and Trichopteran larvae R. MARCHANT AND D. RYAN Museum Victoria, GPO Box 666E, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia ([email protected]) Abstract Marchant, R. and Ryan, D. 2006. Distribution maps for aquatic insects from Victorian rivers and streams: Ephemeropteran and Plecopteran nymphs and Trichopteran larvae. Museum Victoria Science Reports 8: 1–171. Maps of the distribution of 327 species of the aquatic insect orders Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera are provided for reference (undisturbed) sites in 27 of the 29 river basins in Victoria. These maps are based on approximately 13 years of sampling of the larvae and nymphs by the Environment Protection Agency, Victoria. Keywords Insecta, Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, aquatic insects, Australia, Victoria Introduction sensitive to the typical disturbances inflicted on running waters (Marchant et al., 1995) and changes in their The maps presented here represent the distribution of distribution with time will therefore be of interest to both Ephemeropteran, Plecopteran and Trichopteran (EPT) species ecologists and managers. Most can also be reliably identified at reference (undisturbed or least disturbed by human activity) to species, using available identification keys for Australian river sites in Victoria. Victoria is the only state that has taxa (Hawking, 2000). gathered species level invertebrate data for streams and rivers. Other states have also conducted extensive river sampling but We do not comment on each map. To do so would turn this their invertebrate material has usually only been identified to essentially simple mapping exercise into a biogeographic the family level (Simpson and Norris, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • MIAMI UNIVERSITY the Graduate School
    MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certificate for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Mohammed Abdullah Al-Saffar Candidate for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ______________________________________ David J. Berg, Director ______________________________________ Bruce J. Cochrane, Reader ______________________________________ John C. Morse, Reader ______________________________________ Michael J. Vanni, Reader ______________________________________ Thomas O. Crist, Reader ______________________________________ Mary C. Henry, Graduate School Representative ABSTRACT CONSERVATION BIOLOGY IN POORLY STUDIED FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS: FROM ACCELERATED IDENTIFICATION OF WATER QUALITY BIOINDICATORS TO CONSERVATION PLANNING by Mohammed A. Al-Saffar The Tigris and Euphrates Rivers and their tributaries form the arteries of life in the central part of the Middle East, where climate change and anthropogenic disturbance have been evident in recent decades. While the Tigris River has a long history of human use, the conservation status for the majority of its basin is poorly known. In addition, planning for conservation, given limited time, funds, and prior information, has remained a challenge. In my dissertation research, I sampled 53 randomly selected sites in the Kurdistan Region (the KR) of northern Iraq, a poorly studied region of the Upper Tigris and Euphrates freshwater ecoregion, for water quality bioindicators, mayflies (Insecta, Ephemeroptera), stoneflies (Plecoptera), and caddisflies (Trichoptera) (a.k.a. EPT).
    [Show full text]
  • Canopy Arthropods and Herbivory on the Tasmanian Southern Beeches, Nothofagus Cunninghamii and Nothofagus Gunnii
    Canopy Arthropods and Herbivory on the Tasmanian Southern Beeches, Nothofagus cunninghamii and Nothofagus gunnii Volume 1 P. Jane Keble-Williams MB.ChB. (University of Sheffield, UK) Grad. Dip. Env. Stud. (University of Tasmania) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Geography and Environmental Studies University of Tasmania March 2012 ii DECLARATION This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of the my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. P.J. Keble-Williams Statement of Authority of Access This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying and communication in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. iii iv ABSTRACT The Gondwanan relict tree genus Nothofagus has generated much research due to its biogeographical significance in understanding the biota of the Southern Temperate Zone. However, the southern temperate forest arthropod fauna, including that of Nothofagus, has received less attention than northern temperate forest and tropical rainforest. The extant Tasmanian Nothofagus canopy arthropod fauna has been considered depauparate. Yet with a palaeohistory of long persistence, high diversity and widespread distribution of the genus within Australia, the endemic Tasmanian Nothofagaceae – the evergreen Nothofagus cunninghamii and winter deciduous N. gunnii - could be expected to have accreted a large and diverse arthropod fauna, as have its sister Fagalean families in the northern hemisphere.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Current and Selected Bibliographies on Benthic
    1 ================================================================================== CURRENT AND SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHIES ON BENTHIC BIOLOGY – 2014 [published in May 2016] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FOREWORD. “Current and Selected Bibliographies on Benthic Biology” is published annually for the members of the Society for Freshwater Science (SFS) (formerly, the Midwest Benthological Society [MBS, 1953-1975] then the North American Benthological Society [NABS, 1975-2011]). This compilation summarizes titles of articles published during the year (2014). Additionally, pertinent titles of articles published prior to 2014 also have been included if they had not been cited in previous reviews, or to correct errors in previous annual bibliographies, and authors of several sections have also included citations for recent (2015–) publications. I extend my appreciation to past and present members of the MBS, NABS and SFS Literature Review and Publications Committees and the Society presidents and treasurer Mike Swift for their support (including some funds to compensate hourly assistance to Wetzel during the editing of literature contributions from section compilers), to librarians Elizabeth Wohlgemuth (Illinois Natural History Survey) and Susan Braxton (Prairie Research Institute) for their assistance in accessing journals, other publications, bibliographic search engines and abstracting resources, and rare publications critical to the
    [Show full text]