Information Bulletin No.86 (Feb 2010)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Labour and the Struggle for Socialism
Labour and the Struggle for Socialism An ON THE BRINK Publication WIN Publications Summer 2020 On the Brink Editor: Roger Silverman, [email protected] Published by Workers International Network (WIN), contact: [email protected] Front cover photo: Phil Maxwell Labour and the Struggle for Socialism By Roger Silverman From THE RED FLAG (still the Labour Party’s official anthem) The people’s flag is deepest red, It shrouded oft our martyred dead, And ere their limbs grew stiff and cold, Their hearts’ blood dyed its every fold. CHORUS: Then raise the scarlet standard high. Beneath its shade we’ll live and die, Though cowards flinch and traitors sneer, We’ll keep the red flag flying here. With heads uncovered swear we all To bear it onward till we fall. Come dungeons dark or gallows grim, This song shall be our parting hymn. A Turning Point The recently leaked report of the antics of a clique of unaccountable bureaucrats ensconced in Labour headquarters has sent shock waves throughout the movement. Shock – but little surprise, because these creatures had always been in effect “hiding in plain sight”: ostensibly running the party machine, but actually hardly bothering to conceal their sabotage. All that was new was the revelation of the depths of their venom; their treachery; their racist bigotry; the vulgarity with which they bragged about their disloyalty; their contempt for the aspirations of the hundreds of thousands who had surged into the party behind its most popular leader ever, Jeremy Corbyn. They had betrayed the party that employed them and wilfully sabotaged the election prospects of a Labour government. -
By-Election Results: Revised November 2003 1987-92
Factsheet M12 House of Commons Information Office Members Series By-election results: Revised November 2003 1987-92 Contents There were 24 by-elections in the 1987 Summary 2 Parliament. Of these by-elections, eight resulted Notes 3 Tables 3 in a change in winning party compared with the Constituency results 9 1987 General Election. The Conservatives lost Contact information 20 seven seats of which four went to the Liberal Feedback form 21 Democrats and three to Labour. Twenty of the by- elections were caused by the death of the sitting Member of Parliament, while three were due to resignations. This Factsheet is available on the internet through: http://www.parliament.uk/factsheets November 2003 FS No.M12 Ed 3.1 ISSN 0144-4689 © Parliamentary Copyright (House of Commons) 2003 May be reproduced for purposes of private study or research without permission. Reproduction for sale or other commercial purposes not permitted. 2 By-election results: 1987-92 House of Commons Information Office Factsheet M12 Summary There were 24 by-elections in the 1987 Parliament. This introduction gives some of the key facts about the results. The tables on pages 4 to 9 summarise the results and pages 10 to 17 give results for each constituency. Eight seats changed hands in the 1987 Parliament at by-elections. The Conservatives lost four seats to Labour and three to the Liberal Democrats. Labour lost Glasgow, Govan to the SNP. The merger of the Liberal Party and Social Democratic Party took place in March 1988 with the party named the Social and Liberal Democrats. This was changed to Liberal Democrats in 1989. -
'Pabloism' JIONAL MITTEE
'pABLOISM' \ And The JIONAL CRISIS IN THE MITTEE PHILIPPINES De~end surcharged councillors! ON 5 MARCH ~he High Court will rule on the cases of the surcharged Lambeth and qverpool councillors. According to Ted Knight It will almost certainly find against them, despite the £118,000 legal fees paid by Lambeth and the £200,000 by Liverpool. The council ors were In fact bound to take the case to the Liverpool. If they lose they will High Courts. The ruling of the be barred from office (local or District Auditors against them government) for 5 years and perso was based not on any kind of nally liable for the surcharge. hearing or trial, but on the The same would have been true District Auditors' opinion alone. had they not taken the case to No doubt this opinion was shaped the High Court at all. by a few guiding words from If the judgement goes against Patrlck Jenkln. the councillors then a decision The councillors are accused has to be made within 2 weeks of 'wiIful misconduct' In not set as to whether or not to appeal. ting a rate, and Issued surcharge This would cost another £50,000 notices amounting to £126,947 at least for Lambeth. Such a stra against 32 Lambeth councillors tegy may delay the councillors' and £106,103 against the 49 from disqualification for a few more weeks but Is unlikely to reverse the court's decision. Its only pur pose would be as part of a cam paign to mobilise the local trade unions and community to take action against the court decisions. -
Campaigning for the Labour Party but from The
Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Objectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election Nicolas Sigoillot To cite this version: Nicolas Sigoillot. Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Ob- jectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election. Revue française de civilisation britannique, CRECIB - Centre de recherche et d’études en civilisation britannique, 2020, XXV (3), 10.4000/rfcb.5873. hal-03250124 HAL Id: hal-03250124 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03250124 Submitted on 4 Jun 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique French Journal of British Studies XXV-3 | 2020 "Get Brexit Done!" The 2019 General Elections in the UK Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Objectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election Faire campagne pour le parti travailliste mais depuis l’extérieur et avec des objectifs différents: -
Militant Free
FREE MILITANT PDF Michael Crick | none | 03 Mar 2016 | Biteback Publishing | 9781785900297 | English | London, United Kingdom Militant | Definition of Militant by Merriam-Webster Some common synonyms of militant are aggressiveassertiveMilitant self-assertive. While all these words mean "obtrusively energetic especially in pursuing particular goals," militant also implies a fighting Militant but suggests not self-seeking but devotion to a cause, movement, or principle. The synonyms aggressive and militant are sometimes interchangeable, but aggressive implies a disposition to dominate often in disregard of others' rights or Militant determined and energetic pursuit of one's ends. In some situations, the words assertive and militant are roughly equivalent. However, assertive suggests bold self-confidence in expression of opinion. The words self-assertive and militant can be Militant in similar contexts, but self-assertive connotes Militant or brash self-confidence. See more words from the same century Thesaurus Entries near militant milieus militance militancy militant militantness militants militarism. Militant 21 Oct. Please tell us where you read or heard it including the quote, if possible. Test Your Knowledge Militant and learn some interesting things along the way. Subscribe to America's largest dictionary and get thousands Militant definitions and advanced search—ad free! Whereas 'coronary' is Militant so much Put It in Militant 'Frunk' You can never have too Militant storage. What Does 'Eighty-Six' Militant We're intent on clearing it up 'Nip it in the butt' or 'Nip it in the bud'? Militant gonna stop you right there Literally How to use a word Militant literally drives some pe Is Singular 'They' a Better Choice? Name that government! Or something like that. -
Global Labour Column
Global Labour Column column.global-labour-university.org | Number 319, May 2018 Affiliation or victory? The case for continued independence of Britain’s RMT. David O’Connell If there is one element of certainty that highlights the poverty of The RMT’s inability to succeed in its projects, even in coalition strategic thinking and the general desperation on the British left, with the entirety of the radical left, forms the backdrop and it is the complacent view that the Labour Party is the vehicle for makes the question of affiliation inevitable. The case, however, social change. Despite recent memory and history itself standing is flawed. as significant witnesses to the contrary, the prevailing attitude in the movement is ‘all hands to the pump’, that is, to get behind Three arguments for, and why they are wrong the Party as a unifying objective. This is not to say that the Labour Party does not represent an important avenue of The Assistant General Secretary of the RMT, Steve Hedley, gave struggle with which the left must engage. How trade unions, three reasons in a public Facebook post which are the bedrock social movements and campaign groups engage, in light of the of the pro-affiliation position. Party's historical role, must be considered. First, it is argued that the RMT will secure an ‘extra vote’ in the At issue here is the case of the National Union of Rail, Maritime Labour Party, particularly at Constituency Labour Party meetings. and Transport Workers (RMT) which will vote at the end of May This isn’t true. -
1992 Election Results
No 61 GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS, 9 APRIL 1992 This paper presents some analyses of voting in the general election held on 9 April 1992. It is based on the definitive results which are published in Britain Votes 5, by Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher (Dartmouth 1993). CONTENTS 1. Summary of voting. 2. Votes cast for major parties by region. 3. Percentage distribution of votes cast for major parties by region. 4. Changes since June 1987 in major parties' share of votes by region. 5. The results in Northern Ireland. 6. Seats won by party in each region of Great Britain. 7. Change from 1987 in seats won by party in each region. 8. Changes in seats relative to June 1987. 9. Changes in seats relative to dissolution in March 1992. 10. Highest and lowest turnouts (percent). 11. Largest and smallest majorities by party. 12. Highest and lowest shares of the vote, by party. 13. Largest constituency changes between 1987 and 1992 in main parties share of the total vote. 14. Candidates finishing in first, second, third and fourth places (Great Britain only). Staff of the House of Commons Statistical Section regret that they are not available to discuss the contents of this paper with enquirers. The 1992 General Election set several records. More votes were cast than ever before and a single party received more than 14 million votes for the first time. More women (571) stood than ever before and the 60 elected were twice the number elected at any previous election except in 1987. Of these 60, 20 were Conservative, 37 Labour, two Liberal Democrat and one Scottish National Party. -
Labour's 'Broad Church'
ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ARTS, LAW AND SOCIAL SCIENCES REACTION AND RENEWAL – LABOUR’S ‘BROAD CHURCH’ IN THE CONTEXT OF THE BREAKAWAY OF THE SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY 1979-1988 PAUL BLOOMFIELD A thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Anglia Ruskin University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Submitted: November 2017 Acknowledgements There are many people that I would like to thank for their help in the preparation of this thesis. I would like to thank first of all for their supervision and help with my research, my PhD Supervisory team of Dr Jonathan Davis and Professor Rohan McWilliam. Their patience, guidance, exacting thoroughness yet good humour have been greatly appreciated during the long gestation of this research work. For their kind acceptance in participating in the interviews that appear in this thesis, I would like to express my thanks and gratitude to former councillor and leader of Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council John Battye, Steve Garry and former councillor Jeremy Sutcliffe; the Right Honourable the Lord Bryan Davies of Oldham PC; the Right Honourable Frank Dobson MP; Labour activist Eddie Dougall; Baroness Joyce Gould of Potternewton; the Right Honourable the Baroness Dianne Hayter of Kentish Town; the Right Honourable the Lord Neil Kinnock of Bedwelty PC; Paul McHugh; Austin Mitchell MP; the Right Honourable the Lord Giles Radice PC; the Right Honourable the Lord Clive Soley of Hammersmith PC; and the Right Honourable Baroness Williams of Crosby. For their help and assistance I would like to thank the staff at the Labour History Archive and Study Centre, People’s History Museum, Central Manchester, Greater Manchester; the staff at the Neil Kinnock Archives, Churchill College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge; and the staff at the David Owen Archives, University of Liverpool, Special Collections and Archives Centre, Liverpool. -
Appendix 1 the Voting Statistics
Appendix 1 The Voting Statistics Table Al.l Votes and seats 1945-92 (seats in italies) Electorate Total votes Welsh & Scottish Others (mainly and turnout cast Conservative l Labour Liberals Nationalists Communist N.lreland) 19453 73.3% 100%-640 39.8%-213 48.3%-393 9.1%-12 0.2% 0.4%-2 2.l%-20 IV 32836419 24082612 9577667 11 632 191 2197 191 46612 102760 525491 00 1950 84.0% 100%-625 43.5%-299 46.1%-315 9.1%-9 0.1% 0.3% 0.9%-2 "'" 34269770 28772 671 12502567 13 266 592 2621548 27288 91746 262930 1951 82.5% 100%-625 48.0%-321 48.8%-295 2.5%-6 0.1% O.l% 0.5%-3 34645573 28595668 13717538 13 948 605 730556 18219 21640 159 llO 1955 76.8% 100%-630 49.7%-345 46.4%-277 2.7%-6 0.2% 0.1% 0.8%-2 34858263 26760493 13311 936 12404 970 722405 57231 33144 230807 1959 78.7% 100%-630 49.4%-365 43.8%-258 5.9%-6 0.4% 0.1% 0.5%-1 35397080 27859241 13 749 830 12215538 1638571 99309 30897 145090 1964 77.1% 100%-630 43.4%-304 44.l%-317 11.2%-9 0.5% 0.2% 0.6% 35892572 27655374 12001396 12205814 3092878 133551 45932 169431 1966 75.8% 100%-630 41.9%-253 47.9%-363 8.5%-12 0.7% 0.2% 0.7%-2 35964684 27263606 11418433 13 064 951 2327533 189545 62 ll2 201032 1970 72.0% 100%-630 46.4%-330 43.0%-288 7.5%-6 1.3%-1 0.1% 1.7%-5 39342013 28344 798 13 145 123 12178295 2117033 381 818 37970 486557 Feo '74 78.1% 100%-635 37.8%-297 37.1%-301 19.3%-14 2.6%-9 0.1% 3.1%-14 39770724 31340 162 11 872 180 11 646391 6058744 804 554 32743 958293 Oct '74 72.8% 100%-635 35.8%-277 39.2%-319 18.3%-13 3.5%-14 0.1% 3.1%-12 A(\W7') 071 "0 1~0 17~ 1(\ dlid R17 114<;7070 Ii ~41i 7<;4 1 00<; o~R 17 d"li R0711>.1 Electorate Total votes Welsh & Scottish Others (mainly and turnout cast Conservative Labour Liberals, etc. -
General Election Results, 9 April 1992
No 61 GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS, 9 APRIL 1992 This paper presents some analyses of voting in the general election held on 9 April 1992. It is based on the definitive results which are published in Britain Votes 5, by Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher (Dartmouth 1993). CONTENTS 1. Summary of voting. 2. Votes cast for major parties by region. 3. Percentage distribution of votes cast for major parties by region. 4. Changes since June 1987 in major parties' share of votes by region. 5. The results in Northern Ireland. 6. Seats won by party in each region of Great Britain. 7. Change from 1987 in seats won by party in each region. 8. Changes in seats relative to June 1987. 9. Changes in seats relative to dissolution in March 1992. 10. Highest and lowest turnouts (percent). 11. Largest and smallest majorities by party. 12. Highest and lowest shares of the vote, by party. 13. Largest constituency changes between 1987 and 1992 in main parties share of the total vote. 14. Candidates finishing in first, second, third and fourth places (Great Britain only). Staff of the House of Commons Statistical Section regret that they are not available to discuss the contents of this paper with enquirers. The 1992 General Election set several records. More votes were cast than ever before and a single party received more than 14 million votes for the first time. More women (571) stood than ever before and the 60 elected were twice the number elected at any previous election except in 1987. Of these 60, 20 were Conservative, 37 Labour, two Liberal Democrat and one Scottish National Party. -
Inqaba Ya Basebenzi, No. 16/17
Inqaba ya basebenzi, No. 16/17 Use of the Aluka digital library is subject to Aluka’s Terms and Conditions, available at http://www.aluka.org/page/about/termsConditions.jsp. By using Aluka, you agree that you have read and will abide by the Terms and Conditions. Among other things, the Terms and Conditions provide that the content in the Aluka digital library is only for personal, non-commercial use by authorized users of Aluka in connection with research, scholarship, and education. The content in the Aluka digital library is subject to copyright, with the exception of certain governmental works and very old materials that may be in the public domain under applicable law. Permission must be sought from Aluka and/or the applicable copyright holder in connection with any duplication or distribution of these materials where required by applicable law. Aluka is a not-for-profit initiative dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of materials about and from the developing world. For more information about Aluka, please see http://www.aluka.org/. Page 1 of 98 Alternative title Inqaba ya basebenzi Author/Creator Marxist Workers' Tendency of the African National Congress (London) Publisher Marxist Workers' Tendency of the African National Congress (London) Date 1985-01 Resource type Journals (Periodicals) Language Afrikaans, English Subject Coverage (spatial) South Africa, United Kingdom Coverage (temporal) 1985 Source Digital Imaging South Africa (DISA) Rights By kind permission of the African National Congress (ANC). Format extent 48 page(s) (length/size) Page 2 of 98 Nos. 16/17 January-June 1985 Price 75cYA. -
THE LABOUR LEFT PATRICK SEYD Ph. D
THE LABOUR LEFT PATRICK SEYD Ph. D. DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL THEORY AND INSTITUTIONS Vol-- SUBMITTED JUNE 1986 -252- CHAPTER SIX DEMOCRACY IN THE PARTY(2): The Rank and File Mobilising Committee and electing the Party leadership Two days after the decision, at the 1979 Party conference to introduce reselection CLPD issued a newsletter to conference delegates entitled 'The Fight for Democracy Must Go On' in which it stated that "the rank and file must organise to defend, secure and advance the gains already achieved".(1) It's first object was to defend the new reselection procedures from a Right wing counter attack but it also intended to advance the constitutional reforms by removing the PLP's sole right to elect the Party Leader and by establishing the NEC's right to have final responsibility for the Party's election manifesto. We have already examined in the previous chapter the campaign to introduce automatic reselection procedures and we now consider the campaign to advance the Party reforms in these other areas. This campaign to further extend the accountability of the parliamentarians to the Party activists resulted in a single, organised Labour Left grouping which brought together as an alliance a wide range of groups which had previously developed their own strategies and had sometimes been in open conflict. -253- The Rank and File Mobilising Committee In May 1980 the Rank and File Mobilising Committee (hereafter RFMC) was established to defend the constitutional reforms agreed by the 1979 Party conference and to campaign for additional Party reforms. The Left feared that the Party leadership, in alliance with certain trade union leaders, and encouraged by the majority of political commentators, would deflect and defeat the demands for constitutional reform.