Inqaba Ya Basebenzi, No. 16/17

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inqaba Ya Basebenzi, No. 16/17 Inqaba ya basebenzi, No. 16/17 Use of the Aluka digital library is subject to Aluka’s Terms and Conditions, available at http://www.aluka.org/page/about/termsConditions.jsp. By using Aluka, you agree that you have read and will abide by the Terms and Conditions. Among other things, the Terms and Conditions provide that the content in the Aluka digital library is only for personal, non-commercial use by authorized users of Aluka in connection with research, scholarship, and education. The content in the Aluka digital library is subject to copyright, with the exception of certain governmental works and very old materials that may be in the public domain under applicable law. Permission must be sought from Aluka and/or the applicable copyright holder in connection with any duplication or distribution of these materials where required by applicable law. Aluka is a not-for-profit initiative dedicated to creating and preserving a digital archive of materials about and from the developing world. For more information about Aluka, please see http://www.aluka.org/. Page 1 of 98 Alternative title Inqaba ya basebenzi Author/Creator Marxist Workers' Tendency of the African National Congress (London) Publisher Marxist Workers' Tendency of the African National Congress (London) Date 1985-01 Resource type Journals (Periodicals) Language Afrikaans, English Subject Coverage (spatial) South Africa, United Kingdom Coverage (temporal) 1985 Source Digital Imaging South Africa (DISA) Rights By kind permission of the African National Congress (ANC). Format extent 48 page(s) (length/size) Page 2 of 98 Nos. 16/17 January-June 1985 Price 75cYA. BASEBEJournal of the Marxist Workers' Tendencyof the African National Congress;~ 983AZAPO 000 General strike *010 Sudan East Germany Page 3 of 98 INQABA47Special supplement with this issueSOUTH AFRICAN PERSPECTIVES:Workers' revolution orracial civil war The economy --basis of perspectives Character and tasks of the revolution Reform, reaction and civil war Strategy and tasksComrades are urged to read and systematically discussthis document in study circles. Make photocopies andpass Ingaba and the supplement on to others.helped to foster an atmosphere ofhope lacking in earlier years.Western capitalist leadersunderstood very well that the EastGerman working class were notdemonstrating for the return ofcapitalism. The West Germangovernment was content to makepropaganda points on the.radio butcertainly not to offer any real supportto the workers.The leaders of trade unions in theWest were also unwilling to offer anysupport. When East Berlin workersmarched through the Brandenburggate into West Berlin, they receivedthe sympathy of the working classand gifts of cigarettes and chocolates.In Magdeburg, railway workerstold East German workers, "Wenegotiate neither with Adenauer(Chancellor of West Germany) norwith Ulbricht but only withOllenhauer (the leader of the SPD)."Ollenhauer was following the lead ofthe West German and the Americanruling classes, who would prefer,whatever their differences with theRussian bureaucracy, for them tomaintain control of the East Germanstate, rather than to have genuineworkers' democracy.Although the Berlin uprising wascrushed, it showed the bureaucracythat it could no longer treat the work-ing class with contempt. When Polishworkers came onto the streets in1956, the East German bureaucracyrapidly acted to lower consumerprices by up to 50%, to ward off anyworkers' protest.In the 1960s there were growthrates of 5-6% in East Germany, andfar more was spent on the improve-ment of living standards than in mostother East European countries, withlarge subsidies for consumer goods.But regardless of these reforms,East Germany remains a state in crisisand the development of society willcome up against the obstacle formedby the bureaucracy with all its waste,incompetence and mismanagement.Eastern Europe needs workers'democracy to develop fully, like a liv-ing body needs oxygen.The memory of the 1953 uprisingwill serve as an inspiration to EastGerman workers as their struggles in-evitably impel them towards politicalrevolution, the successful overthrowof bureaucratic control of society,and the implementation of realworkers' democracy, in East Ger-many and throughout all EasternEurope. Page 4 of 98 CONTENTSEditorialZimbabwe: socialists detainedGEMWU campaignInterviewsInternational protestAZAPOBritish school strikeSA: general strikeANC . suspensionsPesticidesObituary: L.J.NothaSelibe Phikwe strike, 1975SudanEast German uprising, 1953page 2page 8page 14page 17page 18page 22page 26page 28page 33page 34page 36page 3 7page 41page 43For security reasons, fictitious names have been used by writers of articles in thisissue of lngaba ya Basebenzi. In every case, however, care has been taken not togive a misleading impression of the background and experience' of the comradeconcerned. Details about writers are provided only when security considerations makethis possible.lngaba ya Basebenzi, BM Box 1719, London WC 1 N 3XX, BritainPrinted by Eastway Offset Press (TU) Ltd3/13 Hepscott Road, London E9 5HB Page 5 of 98 ingah'aYA BASEBENZICan negotiations bringmajority rule?- Editorial Board statementcirculated in South Africa,9 February 1985Scarcely a year ago the new con-stitution, with its coloured and Indian"parliaments", was presented to thewhites as a way of securing theirpolitical privileges, by definitely ex-cluding the African majority fromthe vote. Now, in the very first ses-of the new "parliaments",M. Both. is forced to concede thatthe question of the political rights ofthe African people cannot beavoided.The new constitution has had astill-birth. The magnificent move-ment of all sections of the blackworking people-on the politicalplane even more than on theindustrial-has ensured this.Intended to divide the colouredand Indian people from the Africans,it provided instead a focus for unityin action between the coloured, In-dian and African workers and youth.Instead of avoiding the issue of ma-jority rule, it has accentuated thequestion, intensifying the struggle ofthe Africans and all oppressed peo-ple for democratic rights.Faced with deepening economiccrisis; with the growing challenge ofthe black workers; with the revoltwithin the communities and amongthe youth; faced above all with theprospect of mounting political strikeaction headed by the organisedworkers-all sections of the capitalistclass are having to recognise that thenew constitution is impotent.Botha's January 25th speech hasbeen hailed as the most "reformist"of his career. It has been made,moreover, against the background ofan apparent shift in the regime's posi-tion on the question of negotiationswith the ANC and the release ofNelson Mandela.But the proposals contained inBotha's speech share with allprevious schemes one common pur-pose: to prevent majority rule.Whilst the regime officiallyacknowledges that the Verwoerdiandream of a "white South Africa"free of blacks is unrealisable, it pro-poses yet another device for wardingoff the demand for one-person-one-vote in an undivided South Africa.It also hopes to create a climate ofacceptability amongst whites for theidea that Africans would have to beincluded in the future governing ofSouth Africa. But which Africans?Not the majority.The regime seeks a formula forfragmenting the African majority bydividing "legal" urban Africans fromthe "illegals", and dividing thoseconsidered "permanent" from thoseconsidered "temporary", as well asfrom their fellow-Africans in the"homelands". Conceivably, somesuch African MINORITY might thenbe conceded rights to the administra-tion of their so-called "own affairs",with some,,yoice in the apparatus ofcentral government. Plainly, onlystooges and sell-outs would col-laborate in any such scheme.The political representatives ofcapitalism in SA may have their dif-ferences but over one question all areunited: the Africanjnajority shall notbe allowed to bring to power throughtheir votes in an undivided SouthAfrica a government whose charactercorresponds to their numericalweight. This is the basis of all the"confederal", "federal" etc schemesof the ruling class.This is not accidental nor the pro-duct merely of the vile prejudicesamong the whites.Black working people who con-stitute the majority in South Africademand majority rule in order tosolve the problems of starvationwages, unemployment, housing,health, education, etc. Capitalism inSouth Africa, weak and crisis-ridden,suffering acutely from the convul-sions of a diseased world capitalistsystem, is utterly incapable of satis-fying these demands.The ruling class knows full wellthat, were a government electeddemocratically, the demands placedon it by mass pressure would presentan irreconcilable challenge to the pro-fit system itself. Capitalism is theenemy of democracy in SA. Tqachieve majority rule in an undiviJded SA, it is necessary to break thepower of the capitalist class.In a vain attempt to conceal theanti-democratic character of the pre-sent initiatives from the maises, theruling class is fuelling spelculationabout negotiations with the ANC andthe release of Mandela. In this waythey hope to present their presentproposals as part of an "evolutionaryprocess" of "power-sharing" thatwill culminate in a peaceful settle-ment with the ANC.Were a peaceful negotiated st?lu-tion of the democratic question possi-ble, every worker would welcome it.But, behin' every new constitutionalscheme, the real power of the rulingclass rests ultimately on its statemachine-i- in essence armedbodies of men making up the armyand the
Recommended publications
  • By-Election Results: Revised November 2003 1987-92
    Factsheet M12 House of Commons Information Office Members Series By-election results: Revised November 2003 1987-92 Contents There were 24 by-elections in the 1987 Summary 2 Parliament. Of these by-elections, eight resulted Notes 3 Tables 3 in a change in winning party compared with the Constituency results 9 1987 General Election. The Conservatives lost Contact information 20 seven seats of which four went to the Liberal Feedback form 21 Democrats and three to Labour. Twenty of the by- elections were caused by the death of the sitting Member of Parliament, while three were due to resignations. This Factsheet is available on the internet through: http://www.parliament.uk/factsheets November 2003 FS No.M12 Ed 3.1 ISSN 0144-4689 © Parliamentary Copyright (House of Commons) 2003 May be reproduced for purposes of private study or research without permission. Reproduction for sale or other commercial purposes not permitted. 2 By-election results: 1987-92 House of Commons Information Office Factsheet M12 Summary There were 24 by-elections in the 1987 Parliament. This introduction gives some of the key facts about the results. The tables on pages 4 to 9 summarise the results and pages 10 to 17 give results for each constituency. Eight seats changed hands in the 1987 Parliament at by-elections. The Conservatives lost four seats to Labour and three to the Liberal Democrats. Labour lost Glasgow, Govan to the SNP. The merger of the Liberal Party and Social Democratic Party took place in March 1988 with the party named the Social and Liberal Democrats. This was changed to Liberal Democrats in 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Bulletin No.86 (Feb 2010)
    MODERN RECORDS CENTRE MODERN RECORDS CENTRE INFORMATION BULLETIN INFORMATION BULLETIN No. 86 February 2010 ISSN 0309-0418 No. 80 June 2006 ISSN 0309-0418 Strongroom re-shelving The removal to an outstore of the contents of our upper archive strongroom was recently completed and work has now begun on installing the new shelving. The removed collections, which include most of the archives of the Transport and General Workers’ Union and its predecessors, the National Cycle Archive and the University of Warwick Archive, will be unavailable until some time in May or June. But once the work has been completed it will give us much-needed additional space to store existing and future accessions. Cataloguing and access The number of publicly available record descriptions on our catalogues database now stands at over 191,800. Notable recent additions to the database have included finding aids to the archives of: Richard Hyman, professor of industrial relations (HYM). The British Air Line Pilots' Association (BAP). Bookmark Publications (BOO): including minutes of the Socialist Workers Party Publications Committee, 1984-1991; edited drafts of publications, including works by Tony Cliff, Alex Callinicos, Paul Foot and Chris Harman, 1981-1991; and published books and pamphlets. The National League of the Blind and Disabled, a trade union of visually impaired and disabled people, 1915-1994 (NLB): including subject files on labour disputes and the employment of the blind and disabled. Eric de Mare (Social Credit collection) (SCC). The NatWest Staff Association (NWS). The Drawing Office Materials Manufacturers and Dealers Association (DOM). Thomas Alan Swinden, CBI deputy director general (TSP).
    [Show full text]
  • Campaigning for the Labour Party but from The
    Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Objectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election Nicolas Sigoillot To cite this version: Nicolas Sigoillot. Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Ob- jectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election. Revue française de civilisation britannique, CRECIB - Centre de recherche et d’études en civilisation britannique, 2020, XXV (3), 10.4000/rfcb.5873. hal-03250124 HAL Id: hal-03250124 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03250124 Submitted on 4 Jun 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique French Journal of British Studies XXV-3 | 2020 "Get Brexit Done!" The 2019 General Elections in the UK Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Objectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election Faire campagne pour le parti travailliste mais depuis l’extérieur et avec des objectifs différents:
    [Show full text]
  • Global Labour Column
    Global Labour Column column.global-labour-university.org | Number 319, May 2018 Affiliation or victory? The case for continued independence of Britain’s RMT. David O’Connell If there is one element of certainty that highlights the poverty of The RMT’s inability to succeed in its projects, even in coalition strategic thinking and the general desperation on the British left, with the entirety of the radical left, forms the backdrop and it is the complacent view that the Labour Party is the vehicle for makes the question of affiliation inevitable. The case, however, social change. Despite recent memory and history itself standing is flawed. as significant witnesses to the contrary, the prevailing attitude in the movement is ‘all hands to the pump’, that is, to get behind Three arguments for, and why they are wrong the Party as a unifying objective. This is not to say that the Labour Party does not represent an important avenue of The Assistant General Secretary of the RMT, Steve Hedley, gave struggle with which the left must engage. How trade unions, three reasons in a public Facebook post which are the bedrock social movements and campaign groups engage, in light of the of the pro-affiliation position. Party's historical role, must be considered. First, it is argued that the RMT will secure an ‘extra vote’ in the At issue here is the case of the National Union of Rail, Maritime Labour Party, particularly at Constituency Labour Party meetings. and Transport Workers (RMT) which will vote at the end of May This isn’t true.
    [Show full text]
  • 1992 Election Results
    No 61 GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS, 9 APRIL 1992 This paper presents some analyses of voting in the general election held on 9 April 1992. It is based on the definitive results which are published in Britain Votes 5, by Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher (Dartmouth 1993). CONTENTS 1. Summary of voting. 2. Votes cast for major parties by region. 3. Percentage distribution of votes cast for major parties by region. 4. Changes since June 1987 in major parties' share of votes by region. 5. The results in Northern Ireland. 6. Seats won by party in each region of Great Britain. 7. Change from 1987 in seats won by party in each region. 8. Changes in seats relative to June 1987. 9. Changes in seats relative to dissolution in March 1992. 10. Highest and lowest turnouts (percent). 11. Largest and smallest majorities by party. 12. Highest and lowest shares of the vote, by party. 13. Largest constituency changes between 1987 and 1992 in main parties share of the total vote. 14. Candidates finishing in first, second, third and fourth places (Great Britain only). Staff of the House of Commons Statistical Section regret that they are not available to discuss the contents of this paper with enquirers. The 1992 General Election set several records. More votes were cast than ever before and a single party received more than 14 million votes for the first time. More women (571) stood than ever before and the 60 elected were twice the number elected at any previous election except in 1987. Of these 60, 20 were Conservative, 37 Labour, two Liberal Democrat and one Scottish National Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour's 'Broad Church'
    ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF ARTS, LAW AND SOCIAL SCIENCES REACTION AND RENEWAL – LABOUR’S ‘BROAD CHURCH’ IN THE CONTEXT OF THE BREAKAWAY OF THE SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY 1979-1988 PAUL BLOOMFIELD A thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Anglia Ruskin University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Submitted: November 2017 Acknowledgements There are many people that I would like to thank for their help in the preparation of this thesis. I would like to thank first of all for their supervision and help with my research, my PhD Supervisory team of Dr Jonathan Davis and Professor Rohan McWilliam. Their patience, guidance, exacting thoroughness yet good humour have been greatly appreciated during the long gestation of this research work. For their kind acceptance in participating in the interviews that appear in this thesis, I would like to express my thanks and gratitude to former councillor and leader of Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council John Battye, Steve Garry and former councillor Jeremy Sutcliffe; the Right Honourable the Lord Bryan Davies of Oldham PC; the Right Honourable Frank Dobson MP; Labour activist Eddie Dougall; Baroness Joyce Gould of Potternewton; the Right Honourable the Baroness Dianne Hayter of Kentish Town; the Right Honourable the Lord Neil Kinnock of Bedwelty PC; Paul McHugh; Austin Mitchell MP; the Right Honourable the Lord Giles Radice PC; the Right Honourable the Lord Clive Soley of Hammersmith PC; and the Right Honourable Baroness Williams of Crosby. For their help and assistance I would like to thank the staff at the Labour History Archive and Study Centre, People’s History Museum, Central Manchester, Greater Manchester; the staff at the Neil Kinnock Archives, Churchill College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge; and the staff at the David Owen Archives, University of Liverpool, Special Collections and Archives Centre, Liverpool.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 the Voting Statistics
    Appendix 1 The Voting Statistics Table Al.l Votes and seats 1945-92 (seats in italies) Electorate Total votes Welsh & Scottish Others (mainly and turnout cast Conservative l Labour Liberals Nationalists Communist N.lreland) 19453 73.3% 100%-640 39.8%-213 48.3%-393 9.1%-12 0.2% 0.4%-2 2.l%-20 IV 32836419 24082612 9577667 11 632 191 2197 191 46612 102760 525491 00 1950 84.0% 100%-625 43.5%-299 46.1%-315 9.1%-9 0.1% 0.3% 0.9%-2 "'" 34269770 28772 671 12502567 13 266 592 2621548 27288 91746 262930 1951 82.5% 100%-625 48.0%-321 48.8%-295 2.5%-6 0.1% O.l% 0.5%-3 34645573 28595668 13717538 13 948 605 730556 18219 21640 159 llO 1955 76.8% 100%-630 49.7%-345 46.4%-277 2.7%-6 0.2% 0.1% 0.8%-2 34858263 26760493 13311 936 12404 970 722405 57231 33144 230807 1959 78.7% 100%-630 49.4%-365 43.8%-258 5.9%-6 0.4% 0.1% 0.5%-1 35397080 27859241 13 749 830 12215538 1638571 99309 30897 145090 1964 77.1% 100%-630 43.4%-304 44.l%-317 11.2%-9 0.5% 0.2% 0.6% 35892572 27655374 12001396 12205814 3092878 133551 45932 169431 1966 75.8% 100%-630 41.9%-253 47.9%-363 8.5%-12 0.7% 0.2% 0.7%-2 35964684 27263606 11418433 13 064 951 2327533 189545 62 ll2 201032 1970 72.0% 100%-630 46.4%-330 43.0%-288 7.5%-6 1.3%-1 0.1% 1.7%-5 39342013 28344 798 13 145 123 12178295 2117033 381 818 37970 486557 Feo '74 78.1% 100%-635 37.8%-297 37.1%-301 19.3%-14 2.6%-9 0.1% 3.1%-14 39770724 31340 162 11 872 180 11 646391 6058744 804 554 32743 958293 Oct '74 72.8% 100%-635 35.8%-277 39.2%-319 18.3%-13 3.5%-14 0.1% 3.1%-12 A(\W7') 071 "0 1~0 17~ 1(\ dlid R17 114<;7070 Ii ~41i 7<;4 1 00<; o~R 17 d"li R0711>.1 Electorate Total votes Welsh & Scottish Others (mainly and turnout cast Conservative Labour Liberals, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • General Election Results, 9 April 1992
    No 61 GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS, 9 APRIL 1992 This paper presents some analyses of voting in the general election held on 9 April 1992. It is based on the definitive results which are published in Britain Votes 5, by Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher (Dartmouth 1993). CONTENTS 1. Summary of voting. 2. Votes cast for major parties by region. 3. Percentage distribution of votes cast for major parties by region. 4. Changes since June 1987 in major parties' share of votes by region. 5. The results in Northern Ireland. 6. Seats won by party in each region of Great Britain. 7. Change from 1987 in seats won by party in each region. 8. Changes in seats relative to June 1987. 9. Changes in seats relative to dissolution in March 1992. 10. Highest and lowest turnouts (percent). 11. Largest and smallest majorities by party. 12. Highest and lowest shares of the vote, by party. 13. Largest constituency changes between 1987 and 1992 in main parties share of the total vote. 14. Candidates finishing in first, second, third and fourth places (Great Britain only). Staff of the House of Commons Statistical Section regret that they are not available to discuss the contents of this paper with enquirers. The 1992 General Election set several records. More votes were cast than ever before and a single party received more than 14 million votes for the first time. More women (571) stood than ever before and the 60 elected were twice the number elected at any previous election except in 1987. Of these 60, 20 were Conservative, 37 Labour, two Liberal Democrat and one Scottish National Party.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LABOUR LEFT PATRICK SEYD Ph. D
    THE LABOUR LEFT PATRICK SEYD Ph. D. DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL THEORY AND INSTITUTIONS Vol-- SUBMITTED JUNE 1986 -252- CHAPTER SIX DEMOCRACY IN THE PARTY(2): The Rank and File Mobilising Committee and electing the Party leadership Two days after the decision, at the 1979 Party conference to introduce reselection CLPD issued a newsletter to conference delegates entitled 'The Fight for Democracy Must Go On' in which it stated that "the rank and file must organise to defend, secure and advance the gains already achieved".(1) It's first object was to defend the new reselection procedures from a Right wing counter attack but it also intended to advance the constitutional reforms by removing the PLP's sole right to elect the Party Leader and by establishing the NEC's right to have final responsibility for the Party's election manifesto. We have already examined in the previous chapter the campaign to introduce automatic reselection procedures and we now consider the campaign to advance the Party reforms in these other areas. This campaign to further extend the accountability of the parliamentarians to the Party activists resulted in a single, organised Labour Left grouping which brought together as an alliance a wide range of groups which had previously developed their own strategies and had sometimes been in open conflict. -253- The Rank and File Mobilising Committee In May 1980 the Rank and File Mobilising Committee (hereafter RFMC) was established to defend the constitutional reforms agreed by the 1979 Party conference and to campaign for additional Party reforms. The Left feared that the Party leadership, in alliance with certain trade union leaders, and encouraged by the majority of political commentators, would deflect and defeat the demands for constitutional reform.
    [Show full text]
  • Revue Française De Civilisation Britannique, XXV-3 | 2020 Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Obje
    Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique French Journal of British Studies XXV-3 | 2020 "Get Brexit Done!" The 2019 General Elections in the UK Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Objectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election Faire campagne pour le parti travailliste mais depuis l’extérieur et avec des objectifs différents: la position du Socialist Party lors des elections législatives de 2019 au Royaume-Uni. Nicolas Sigoillot Édition électronique URL : http://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/5873 DOI : 10.4000/rfcb.5873 ISSN : 2429-4373 Éditeur CRECIB - Centre de recherche et d'études en civilisation britannique Référence électronique Nicolas Sigoillot, « Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Objectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election », Revue Française de Civilisation Britannique [En ligne], XXV-3 | 2020, mis en ligne le 10 septembre 2020, consulté le 10 septembre 2020. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/5873 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/rfcb. 5873 Ce document a été généré automatiquement le 10 septembre 2020. Revue française de civilisation britannique est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International. Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Obje... 1 Campaigning for the Labour Party but from the Outside and with Different Objectives: the Stance of the Socialist Party in the UK 2019 General Election Faire campagne pour le parti travailliste mais depuis l’extérieur et avec des objectifs différents: la position du Socialist Party lors des elections législatives de 2019 au Royaume-Uni.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the House of Commons Since 1979
    BRIEFING PAPER Number CBP 8256, 13 March 2018 Members of the House of By Chris Watson Commons since 1979 Mark Fawcett Contents: 1. Background 2. All Members of the House of Commons since the 1979 General Election www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary ii Members of the House of Commons since 1979 Contents Summary iii Glossary iv 1. Background vii 1.1 Gender vii 1.2 Age viii 1.3 Ethnicity ix 1.4 Occupation x 2. All Members of the House of Commons since the 1979 General Election xi A 1 B 8 C 33 D 53 E 65 F 70 G 80 H 93 I 115 J 116 K 124 L 130 M 142 N 171 O 174 P 178 Q 189 R 189 S 201 T 222 U 231 V 232 W 233 Y 250 Z 251 Contributing Authors: Oliver Hawkins, Richard Cracknell, Lucinda Maer, Richard Kelly, Mark Sandford, Neil Johnston, Hazel Armstrong, Sarah Priddy, Paul Little Cover page image copyright : Attributed to: Theresa May's first PMQs as Prime Minister by UK Parliament. Licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0 / image cropped. iii Commons Library Briefing, 13 March 2018 Summary Since the 1979 General Election, there have been 2,128 people elected to the House of Commons. Of these, 403 have been women and 1,725 have been men. This publication lists all Members of the House of Commons starting from the 1979 General Election which took place on the 3 May. It is a new edition of our 2010 publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 the British Labour Party And
    This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights and duplication or sale of all or part is not permitted, except that material may be duplicated by you for research, private study, criticism/review or educational purposes. Electronic or print copies are for your own personal, non-commercial use and shall not be passed to any other individual. No quotation may be published without proper acknowledgement. For any other use, or to quote extensively from the work, permission must be obtained from the copyright holder/s. The New Vanguardists: an analysis of Militant Tendency and its involvement in Liverpool in the 1970s and 1980s A PhD Thesis by James Ferguson, June 2021 Keele University. 1 CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction and Overview 1.1 Militant Tendency 21 1.2 Militant dominate the Liverpool Labour Party in the 1970s and 1980s 22 1.3 Trade unions and Militant 23 1.4 Pluralist Society and Militant 23 1.5 The Militant Administration of the Liverpool City Council 24 1.6 Literature Review 26 1.7 Rationale 38 1.8 Aims and Objectives 39 2 Chapter 2 Methodology 2.1 The Single Case Study 41 2.2 The Interview 42 2.3 Elite Interviewing 43 2.4 Key Informants 44 2.5 Interview Technique 45 2.6 Testing the Interview 45 2.7 The consent process for interviews. 46 2.8 Research Questions 47 2.9 Ethical Issues 48 3 Chapter 3 Trotskyist Ideology 3.1 Trotskyism 52 3.2 Trotsky and his role in the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia 52 3.3 The Kronstadt Mutiny 53 3.4 Trotsky in exile and the creation of the Fourth International 58 3.5 Trotsky advocates Entryism 61 3.6 British Trotskyism 62 3.7 Entryism 66 3.8 Collective Entryism 72 3.9 Dual Loyalty Entryists 73 3.10 Individual Entryism 75 3.11 Partial Entryism 77 3.12 Vanguardism 78 3.13 Early Vanguardism 82 4 3.14 The New Vanguardists 84 3.15 Militant and Vanguardism 86 3.16 New Vanguardism and secrecy, the Blackburn mole 89 3.17 Democratic Socialism as opposed to Vanguardism.
    [Show full text]