CARY BUILDING, 105-107 Chambers Street, Borough of Manhattan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CARY BUILDING, 105-107 Chambers Street, Borough of Manhattan Landmarks Preservation CoffillQssion August 24, 1982, Designation List 158 LP-1224 CARY BUILDING, 105-107 Chambers Street, Borough of Manhattan. Built 1856-57; architects King & Kellum; iron cast by D.D. Badger's Architectural Ironworks. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 145, Lot 3. On November 18, 1980, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Cary Building and the proposed designa­ tion of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 10). The hearing was continued to February 10, 1981 (Item No. 3). Both hearings had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Nine witnesses spoke in favor of designation. There was one speaker in opposition to designation. A letter hffi been received in favor of designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS The Cary Building, built in 1856-57, is one of New York's most important 19th-century commercial structures. Designed by one of New York's most prominent firms specializ­ ing in commercial architecture, with cast-iron fronts fabricated by the city's most important foundry, it is a significant early product of the period during the middle of the century when New York's premier position in the commercial life of the nation was established. The pioneering Cary Building exemplifies three developments which set major patterns for the spectacular commercial growth of post-Civil War New York: 1) the commercial redevelopment of the area north and west of City Hall; 2) the introduction of the Italianate "palazzo" type; and 3) the development of the cast-iron facade. The build­ ing's architects, Gamaliel King and John Kellum, were important for their role in shap­ ing the new commercial city; and the foundry which cast the building's iron fronts, Daniel D. Badger's Architectural IronWorks,was the first major foundry in the business and eventually the most prolific and influential. As an early product of key trends in the city's commercial development, as one of the earliest surviving cast-iron buildings, and as the product of a major architect and foundry, the Cary Building is of seminal importance to the development of 19th-century commercial New York. The Commercial Transformation of Lower Manhattan and the Cary Building The unparalleled growth of New York City in the 19th century, which led to its emergence as the largest and richest city in the country, was primarily the result of commerce. Following the end of the War of 1812, which reopened the Atlantic trade routes, and the opening in 1825 of the Erie Canal, which connected New York to the interior, the city grew into the country's major port and trading center. Commercial pressure almost immediately began to push the city beyond the traditional limits of lower ~anhattan, and a pattern of rapid development and redevelopment emerged. The city's commercial districts moved northward into former residential areas, replacing older houses with first-class shops. New well-to-do residential districts developed still further north on the city's outskirts. Older prime commercial areas to the south became warehouse and wholesale districts.l -2- Followingthe completion in 1846 of the A.T. Stewart store, the first department store in the country,2 on Broadway between Reade and Chambers Streets, the residential dis­ trict along Broadway north of City Hall rapidly changed into the city's leading commer­ cial district. Over the next forty years, the Broadway area between City Hall Park and Madison Square became the commercial heart of the metropolis. Stewart's store also set architectural precedents for that development: his architect, John Snook, designed an enormous stone "palazzo," with cast-iron and glass storefronts, in the newly fash­ ionable Italianate style. This was the first of the "commercial pa laces" built for New York's "merchant princes," and it set the style and the type for the next several decades. The change in the Broadway area was noticed as early as 1852: The entire length of Broadway seems to have been measured for a new suit of marble and freestone--six and seven story buildings going up on its whole length, of most magnificent elegance in style ••. Indeed public and private buildings are going up in all directions ... with Aladin-like splendor and celerity.3. By the time of the Civil War, the district's character had irreversibly changed accord­ ing to the writer of a retrospective editorial in Harper's Magazine in 1862: Those who remember the Broadway of twenty years ago can hardly walk the streets now without incessant wonder and surprise. For although the transformation is gradually wrought, it is always going on before the eye. Twenty years ago it was a street of three-story red brick houses. Now it is a highway of stone, and iron, and marble buildings .... Some of the new stores in Broadway are almost as imposing as some of thepalaces in Italian cities.4 The Cary Building on a site running through the block from Chambers to Reade Streets between Church Street and West Broadway,5 was built for the firm of Cary , Howard & Sanger, drygoods rnerchants. 6 The major partner in the firm was William H. Cary (1787- 1861), a Bostonian who carne to New York in the 1820s and eventually became quite weal­ thy, owning real estate in Brooklyn and New York, and stock in banks, insurance com­ panies, and the Brooklyn Railroad Company of which he was president. Cary, Howard & Sanger, established during the economic depression of 1837, prospered so that by 1854 it was considered the "richest house" on the trade. The store was located at 243 Pearl Street, in the older commercial district; Cary, following the trend north and west, purchased the site for a new building on Chambers Street in 1856. The Chambers Street area was already being redeveloped for commercial purposes by that date: one block to the east was A.T . Stewart's store, and one block to the west was the new station for the Hudson River Railroad. Cary's site, originally part of the Trinity Church farm, had already been in use by the New York Bank for Savings since 1844.7 Cary ' s new build­ ing was completed in 1857;8 soon afterwards, the immediately surrounding blocks were largely redeveloped with stone and cast-iron commercial structures. Cary, Howard & Sanger, in its new location, was an important commercial establishment, serving as both store and warehouse. A contemporary account described it as an "ele­ gant structure," and a "first class, well-regulated warehouse-- 1500 different kinds of articl es of foreign and domestic fancy goods comprising jewelry, perfumery, cutlery, guns , musical instruments, combs, brushes, etc. Nothing pertaining to fancy goods that is not to be found here."9 The drygoods department store, initiated by Stewart in 1846 , was still novel, and the same account noted that Cary's store'saves purchasers rnudh time and perplexity ordinarily occasioned by searching for goods at various places," and called the store "the largest and most complete of its kind in the world ... (and) the most satisfactory evidence of the triumph of American excellence in commerce." -3- Cary, as the proprietor of one of the new drygoods stores in the new commercial dis­ trict,had hired King & Kellum, a prominent firm specializing in commercial architecture; they designed an Italianate style "palazzo" in the new tradition of Stewart's store, with facades fabricated in cast iron, the latest innovation in commercial architecture. Cast-Iron Architecture and D.D. Badger's Architectural Iron Works The use of cast-iron in architecture, although not entirely an American innovation, led to the development of one of the most extraordinary indigenous architectural forms in the history of American architecture. Daniel D. Badger (? -1884) was one of the most important innovators in the field and his foundry, the Architectural Iron Works, was the most prolific in New York. James Bogardus and Daniel Badger both published claims to having built the first cast­ iron buildings in America, Bogardus in a promotional pamphlet of 1856, and Badger in a foundry catalogue of 1865.10 In fact, cast iron, mostly imported from England, had been used for decorative and structural purposes from before the turn of the century, and at least one cast-iron front had been constructed as early as 1830.11 ;Bogardus's development and promotion of cast-iron facades, however, and Badger's construction of hundreds of cast-iron storefronts and facades, elevated cast iron from the position of an occasional constructional aid to one of prominence in the field of commercial archi­ tecture for nearly nalf a century.12 The rise of cast iron as an architectural material, widely used for the facades of com­ mercial buildings from the 1850s to the 1890s, can be attributed to a number of techni~ cal and economic factors. Badger claimed for cast iron the virtues of "Strength ... Lightness of Structure ... Facility of Erection ..• Economy ... Durability ... Incombustibi~ lity ... Renovation L-by a coat of paint_)" and added that "sufficient strengthlS:arQbe secured without the exclusion of the light--which is often highly desirable both for mercantile and mechanical purposes."l3 Bogardus, who made similar claims, added that: ... a building once erected, it may be taken to pieces with the same facility and despatch, without injuring or destroying any of its parts, and then re-erected elsewhere with the same per­ fection as at first.l4 The advantage of economy derived not so much from the cost of iron relative to stone, but from the replacement of costly elaborate stone-carvingwith inexpensive prefabri­ cated iron casting. The advantage of allowing in a maximum of light was of great im­ portance to retail stores.
Recommended publications
  • Borough Hall Skyscraper Historic District Designation Report
    Cover Photograph: Court Street looking south along Skyscraper Row towards Brooklyn City Hall, now Brooklyn Borough Hall (1845-48, Gamaliel King) and the Brooklyn Municipal Building (1923-26, McKenzie, Voorhees & Gmelin). Christopher D. Brazee, 2011 Borough Hall Skyscraper Historic District Designation Report Prepared by Christopher D. Brazee Edited by Mary Beth Betts, Director of Research Photographs by Christopher D. Brazee Map by Jennifer L. Most Technical Assistance by Lauren Miller Commissioners Robert B. Tierney, Chair Pablo E. Vengoechea, Vice-Chair Frederick Bland Christopher Moore Diana Chapin Margery Perlmutter Michael Devonshire Elizabeth Ryan Joan Gerner Roberta Washington Michael Goldblum Kate Daly, Executive Director Mark Silberman, Counsel Sarah Carroll, Director of Preservation TABLE OF CONTENTS BOROUGH HALL SKYSCRAPER HISTORIC DISTRICT MAP ................... FACING PAGE 1 TESTIMONY AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ................................................................................ 1 BOROUGH HALL SKYSCRAPER HISTORIC DISTRICT BOUNDARIES ............................. 1 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 3 THE HISTORICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BOROUGH HALL SKYSCRAPER HISTORIC DISTRICT ........................................................................................ 5 Early History and Development of Brooklyn‟s Civic Center ................................................... 5 Mid 19th Century Development
    [Show full text]
  • Landmarks Preservation Commission May 15, 2007, Designation List 392 LP-2213
    Landmarks Preservation Commission May 15, 2007, Designation List 392 LP-2213 63 NASSAU STREET BUILDING, 63 Nassau Street, Manhattan. Built c. 1844; cast-iron facade c.1857- 59, attributed to James Bogardus. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 65, Lot 2. On November 14, 2006, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the pro- posed designation as a Landmark of the 63 Nassau Street Building and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 5). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Seven people spoke in favor of designation, including representatives of Margot Gayle, founder of the Friends of Cast Iron Architecture (who was present), the Municipal Art Society of New York, New York Landmarks Conservancy, Historic Districts Council, and Metropolitan Chapter of the Victorian Society in America. A rep- resentative of the building’s owner testified against designation. In addition, the Commission received several communications in support of designation, including a resolution from Manhattan Community Board 1. The building had been previously heard by the Commission on December 27, 1966, and January 31, 1967 (LP- 0600). Summary The 5-story, Italianate style cast-iron front facade on the building at No. 63 Nassau Street was almost certainly produced c. 1857-59 by James Bogardus, the pioneer of cast iron architecture in America, making it an extremely rare extant example of his work – it is one of only five known Bogardus buildings in the U.S. (four in New York City). It is also one of the oldest surviving cast-iron- fronted buildings in the city, and one of the very few located in Lower Manhattan, the oldest part of the city and its original financial center.
    [Show full text]
  • BOGARDUS BUILDING 75 Murray Street
    BOGARDUS BUILDING 75 Murray Street Lower, Main & 2nd Level New York NY 10007 GLOBAL BROKERS MARKETING YOUR PROPERTY WORLDWIDE NestSeekers.com 75 MURRAY STREET, COMMERCIAL SPACE WEB ID 573419 Harry Zikos of Nest Seekers International has been boasts 11 foot ceilings. There is also a small kitchen area RENT: Available Upon Request retained on an exclusive basis to represent 3 levels and large baths. The lower level also shares a generous of commercial space available for lease at the and open floorplan which allows a wealth of use cases 3 Levels| 5 Baths| 7125 Approx. Sq.Ft. landmarked Bogardus Building located at 75 Murray for numerous entity types. Total Space Available: 7125 Approx. Sq.Ft. Street in TriBeCa, nestled on the north side of the block The second level has 200 amps of electrical service and Lower Level: 2375 Approx. Sq.Ft. between West Broadway & Greenwich Street. The 25 enjoys elevator access, high ceilings, wide planked Main Level: 2375 Approx. Sq.Ft. foot wide cast-iron elevator building sits seconds from wood floors, exposed brick and renovated bathrooms. both Chambers Street 1,2,3, A & C train stations, in the The signature of historic TriBeCa is illustrated by the Second Level: 2375 Approx. Sq.Ft. C6-2A district, which is a commercial district outside openness of the space with southern exposure on from the Central Business District. The building was built and the original landmarked cast iron façade windows. • Basement • Hardwood Floors designed by world renowned, James Bogardus in 1857 • Elevator • High Ceiling for the glassware manufacturing business of Francis & The neighborhood offers tremendous potential to • Exposed Brick • Multi-level John Hopkins.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Fresh and Weathered Marble from the Tweed Courthouse
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2001 A Comparison of Fresh and Weathered Marble from the Tweed Courthouse Robert Lamb Ware University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Ware, Robert Lamb, "A Comparison of Fresh and Weathered Marble from the Tweed Courthouse" (2001). Theses (Historic Preservation). 382. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/382 Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Ware, Robert Lamb (2001). A Comparison of Fresh and Weathered Marble from the Tweed Courthouse. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/382 For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Comparison of Fresh and Weathered Marble from the Tweed Courthouse Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Ware, Robert Lamb (2001). A Comparison of Fresh and Weathered Marble from the Tweed Courthouse. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/382 I m ^k lib. m * km UNivERsmy PENNSYL\^^NL^ UBRARIE5 A COMPARISON OF FRESH AND WEATHERED MARBLE FROM THE TWEED COURTHOUSE Robert Lamb Ware A THESIS in Historic Preservation Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE 2001 MU>\ri<^v^5 Supervisor Reader A.
    [Show full text]
  • Cast Iron Architecture in Soho & Tribeca
    PREVIEWCOPY Introduction New York City’s TriBeCa and SoHo neighborhoods in downtown Manhattan are home to the largest concentration of cast iron facades in the world. Built in a short window of time from 1850-90 to support a thriving dry goods industry, these architectural gems offer an unrivaled perspective into early industrial New York, a time before skyscrapers, luxury retail and Starbucks Coffee shops on every corner. They are yours to discover. What’s in this guidebook • History. We discuss the origins of the SoHo and TriBeCa neighborhoods in the 19th century and why dry goods merchants chose to base their businesses in this part of the city. • Cast iron technology. We explore why cast iron was the ideal choice for the facades of mer- chants’ “store and loft” buildings. • Architectural styles. We profile the five prevailing styles of facades and their defining char- acteristics: Roman, Venetian, Sperm Candle, Second Empire and Neo-Grec. To make things come alive, we offer high-resolution images that reveal salient architectural and decorative features with color highlights. • Walking tour of the highlights. Following our tradition of being the most valuable re- source for culture-focused travelers, we offer a walking tour that showcases thirteen of the most impressive facades in SoHo and TriBeCa. For each, we reveal its most important archi- tectural features and offer a discussion that ties it all together. • Advice for getting thePREVIEW best cultural experience. To help you plan your visit, this guide- book supplies logistical advice, maps andCOPY links to online resources. Plus, we give our personal tips for getting the most from your experience while on location.
    [Show full text]
  • Landmarks Preservation Commission January 12, 2010, Designation List 425 LP-2338
    Landmarks Preservation Commission January 12, 2010, Designation List 425 LP-2338 WEST PARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, 165 West 86th Street (aka 165-167 West 86th Street and 541 Amsterdam Avenue), Manhattan Original chapel built 1883-85, Leopold Eidlitz, architect; current church and chapel façade built 1889-90, Henry Kilburn, architect Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 1217, Lot 1 On July 14, 2009, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation of the West Park Presbyterian Church and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item. No. 1). The hearing was duly advertised according to the provisions of law. Fifty-six witnesses spoke in favor of the designation, including Councilmember Gale Brewer, Assemblymember Linda B. Rosenthal, and Councilmember Tony Avella, as well as representatives of Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer, Councilmember Bill DeBlasio, Public Advocate Betsy Gotbaum, the Historic Districts Council, the Municipal Arts Society, Manhattan Community Board 7, New York Landmarks Conservancy, Landmark West!, the Victorian Society, and the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation. Thirteen speakers testified in opposition to the proposed designation, including both the church’s pastor and its Ecumenical Associate Minister, the Reverend Dr. Robert L. Brasher and the Reverend Dr. Katherine Kurs, respectively, as well as members of the West Park congregation and the Reverend N.J. L’Heureux of the Committee of Religious Leaders in the City of New York. In addition, the Commission received numerous letters, e-mails, and post cards in support of designation. Summary The West Park Presbyterian Church is considered to be one of the best examples of a Romanesque Revival style religious structure in New York City.
    [Show full text]
  • Halls of the City Brochure
    Halls of the City Halls of the City Table of Contents Manhattan » Surrogate’s Court 2-3 » Supreme Court 4-5 » Tweed Courthouse 6-7 » Marriage Bureau 8-9 Brooklyn The New York City Department of Citywide Administrative Services (DCAS) manages 55 City-owned buildings, many » Borough Hall 10-11 of them beautiful and historic spaces. Since these facilities belong to the public, the City can make them available on Queens a rental basis to individuals, corporations, and non-profit groups for their special events and celebrations. What » Supreme Court 12-13 follows is some information about the spaces available. » Civil Court 14-15 Please contact DCAS Special Events for pricing and further » Borough Hall 16-17 details at [email protected], or 212-386-0041. Bronx » County Courthouse 18-19 History and Background 20-23 Event Fee Base Cost 24-25 1 Manhattan Surrogate’s Court 31 Chambers Street • Square footage: 10,268 • Guest capacity: 500 standing; 275 seated • Special features: o Balcony, high ceilings, grand double staircase 2 3 Manhattan Supreme Court 60 Centre Street • Square footage: 5,832 • Guest capacity: 500 standing; 275 seated • Special features: o High ceiling with mural, stained glass windows, exterior terrace 4 5 Manhattan Tweed Courthouse 52 Chambers Street • Square footage: 3,285 • Guest capacity: 300 standing; 150 seated • Special features: o High, stained glass ceiling 6 7 Manhattan Marriage Bureau 141 Worth Street • Square footage: 6,800 • Guest capacity: 200 standing • Special features: o Unique space 8 9 Brooklyn Borough
    [Show full text]
  • Soho Cast Iron Historic District Designation Report
    S OH 0 - CAST IRON HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGWATIOI REPORT 1973 City of New York John V. Lindsay, Mayor Parks, Recreation and' Cultural Affairs Administration Richard M. Clurman,; Administrator Landmarks Preservation Commission Harmon H. Goldstone, Chairman SH-CI HD Copyright © 1973, by the City of New York. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means-, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Applications for such permission should be addressed to; i. Landmarks Preservation Commission * 305 Broadway ,-.... Mew York, New York 10007 ••..-,.•' » SOHO-CAST IRON HISTORIC DISTRICT MANHATTAN Note: Block numbers are for reference to the text. DESIGNATED AUGUST 14. 1973 SH-CI HD •C 0 N T E N T S BOUNDARIES AND. INTRODUCTION ' TESTIMONY AT PUBLIC HEARINGS 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .. • • 3 PART I 1. LAND USE! SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC HISTORY ...4 The Colonial. Period - Farms and Forts' 4 The Early Republic ,.. „• 5 1815-1850 -A Residential Neighborhood .............. (. 6 1850-1900- Entertainment, Commerce and Industry 6 Decay and Rebirth -Artists and Industry ;. 8 2. STYLISTIC HISTORY .... ,' : 9 . Early Non-Commercial Architecture ; 9 Early Commercial Architecture 9 Cast-iron Architecture ..... 12 Later Architecture I Developments ,..'. 14 3. CAST IRON AS A BUILDING MATERIAL 16 .Cast.Iron and Wrought Iron: Ear I y. Development and Use 16 Structural Techniques 17 Cast Iron Developments in the United States .......18 Cast Iron in New York City -. ..'..' 19 The Work of Daniel Badger and James Bogardus '.. 19 The Virtues and. Defects of Cast Iron 21 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribeca Was Originally Developed in the Early 19Th Century As a Residential Neighborhood Close to the City’S Center in Lower Manhattan
    A GUIDE TO HISTORIC NEW YORK CITY NEIGHBORHOODS T RIBECA ManhaTTan The Historic Districts Council is New York’s citywide advocate for historic buildings and neighborhoods. The Six to Celebrate program annually identifies six historic New York City neighborhoods that merit preservation as priorities for HDC’s advocacy and consultation over a yearlong period. The six, chosen from applications submitted by community organizations, are selected on the basis of the architectural and historic merit of the area, the level of threat to the neighborhood, the strength and willingness of the local advocates, and the potential for HDC’s preservation support to be meaningful. HDC works with these neighborhood partners to set and reach pres- ervation goals through strategic planning, advocacy, outreach, programs and publicity. The core belief of the Historic Districts Council is that preservation and enhancement of New York City’s historic resources—its neighborhoods, buildings, parks and public spaces—are central to the continued success of the city. The Historic Districts Council works to ensure the preservation of these resources and uphold the New York City Landmarks Law and to further the preservation ethic. This mission is accomplished through ongoing programs of assistance to more than 500 community and neighborhood groups and through public-policy initiatives, publications, educational outreach and sponsorship of community events. Six to Celebrate is generously supported by The New York Community Trust. Additional support for Six to Celebrate is provided by the New York State Council on the Arts with the support of Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature and by public funds from the New York City Depart- ment of Cultural Affairs in partnership with the City Council and New York City Councilmembers Margaret Chin, Inez Dickens, Daniel Garodnick, Vincent Gentile, Sara Gonzalez, Stephen Levin and Rosie Mendez.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register Off Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form 1
    FHR-8-300 (11-78) United States Department off the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register off Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections_______________ 1. Name_________________ historic Withington Estate and/or common Heathcote Farm 2. Location street & number Spruce Lane N/A. not for publication city, town Kingstown (So. vicinity of state New Jersey code 034 county Middlesex code 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public X occupied agriculture museum x building(s) -X_ private unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational X private residence X site Public Acquisition -NA Accessible entertainment religious object in process X _ yes: restricted government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military other: 4. Owner of Property name See Continuation Sheet 4-1 street & number city, town vicinity of state 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Middlesex County Administration Building street & number John F. Kennedy Square city, town New Brunswick state New Jersey 6. Representation in Existing Surveys Middlesex County Inventory of Historic, title Cultural, & Architectural Re- has this property been determined eligible? yes X no sources date 1979 federal state X county local depository for survey records office of New Jersey Heritage, CN 402 city, town Trenton state NJ 08625 7. Description Condition Check one Check one X excellent deteriorated unaltered X original site good \ ruins X altered moved date fair unexposed Describe the present and original (iff known) physical appearance INTRODUCTION The Withington Estate, or Heathcote Farm, is located on the outskirts of the village of Kingston in South Brunswick Township, Middlesex County, New Jersey (Figures 1 and 2).
    [Show full text]
  • The Washington Street Urban Renewal Project
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2001 Moving Historic Structures: The aW shington Street Urban Renewal Project Diane Alyssa Jackier University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Jackier, Diane Alyssa, "Moving Historic Structures: The ashinW gton Street Urban Renewal Project" (2001). Theses (Historic Preservation). 331. http://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/331 Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Jackier, Diane Alyssa (2001). Moving Historic Structures: The Washington Street Urban Renewal Project. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. http://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/331 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Moving Historic Structures: The aW shington Street Urban Renewal Project Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Jackier, Diane Alyssa (2001). Moving Historic Structures: The Washington Street Urban Renewal Project. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: http://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/331 MOVING HISTORIC STRUCTURES: THE WASHINGTON STREET URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT Diane Alyssa Jackier A THESIS Historic Preservation Presented to tlie Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE 2001 [\^ilyf L V- ^ Jrvisor (^ (y Reader \ David G. De Long, Ph.D. Eugenie L. Birch Professor of Architecture in Historic Preservation Professor and Chair of City and Regional Planning l/\yiAlMA9 Graduate [Group Chair Frank G.
    [Show full text]
  • INDIVIDUAL INTERVIEW the Reminiscences of Oliver Allen
    INDIVIDUAL INTERVIEW The Reminiscences of Oliver Allen © 2010 New York Preservation Archive Project PREFACE The following oral history is the result of a recorded interview with Oliver Allen conducted by Interviewer Peter Reda on March 30, 2010. This interview is part of the New York Preservation Archive’s Project’s collection of individual oral history interviews. The reader is asked to bear in mind that s/he is reading a verbatim transcript of the spoken word, rather than written prose. The views expressed in this oral history interview do not necessarily reflect the views of the New York Preservation Archive Project. In 1982, Oliver Allen and his wife moved into a loft in Tribeca. A retired writer for Life magazine and Time-Life Books, Allen quickly became a preservation activist, taking on a role as photographer for the Landmarks Commission’s survey of historic properties in the neighborhood. In the 1990s he co-founded the Friends of Duane Park and began writing articles on Tribeca history, which were collected into a book in 1999. In this 2010 oral history interview conducted by Pratt Institute graduate student Peter Reda, Allen discusses his involvement in the process of designating Tribeca’s historic districts and his observations on neighborhood history, the value of historic landmarks, and the impact that landmark designation has had on Tribeca Oliver Allen meticulously documented New York City and Tribeca history through careers as a writer and editor for LIFE magazine, as editor at Time-Life books, and as an independent author. His column for the Tribeca Tribune, “Old Tribeca,” was a neighborhood fixture, and his books from New York, New York to The Texture of Tribeca garnerned widespread critical acclaim.
    [Show full text]