DOCSLIB.ORG

Upper Nile State, South Sudan October - December 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Upper Nile State, South Sudan October - December 2018 Situation Overview: Upper Nile State, South Sudan October - December 2018 Map 1: Assessment coverage in UNS in October security, education, nutrition and protection Introduction METHODOLOGY (A), November (B) and December 2018 (C) in their previous settlements-of-residence. In the fourth quarter of 2018, Upper Nile State Primary data was triangulated with secondary To provide an overview of the situation in (UNS) saw localised insecurity in Nasir County 0 - 4.9% C A information and past REACH assessments. largely inaccessible areas of Upper Nile State, and population inflows from neighbouring 5 - 10% REACH uses primary data from key informants 11 - 20% This situation overview (SO) evaluates who have recently arrived from, recently visited, Sudan and Ethiopia amplified by the onset of Manyo 21 - 50% changes in observed humanitarian needs or receive regular information from a location the dry season. Insecurity and reported returns 51 - 100% Renk across UNS in the fourth quarter of 2018. or “Area of Knowledge” (AoK). Information for may have also perpetuated food insecurity, Assessed settlement The first section analyses displacement and this report was collected from key informants limited access to protected water sources and B population movement to and from the area, in Malakal PoC site in Upper Nile as well as sub-standard internally displaced persons’ in Akobo, in neighbouring Jonglei State, in Melut while the second section disaggregates trends (IDPs’) shelter conditions. Data on needs in October, November and December 2018. on access to food and basic services, including UNS is required to inform the humanitarian Malakal Fashoda Maban sections on food security and livelihoods (FSL); In-depth interviews were conducted over the first response. However, information gaps exist three weeks of each month. The standardised Panyikang Baliet protection; WASH and health; shelter and non- due to different regional dynamics and limited survey tool included questions on displacement access throughout much of the state. Longochuck food items (NFIs); and education. trends, population needs, food security and livelihoods, and access to basic services. After Nasir Information is presented across two geographic REACH has been assessing hard-to-reach Maiwut data collection was completed, all data was areas of South Sudan since December 2015 Ulang zones in UNS: the western bank (Panyikang, Malakal, Fashoda and Manyo counties) and aggregated at settlement level, and settlements in order to inform the response of humanitarian were assigned the modal response. When no southeastern UNS (Nasir and Ulang counties). actors working outside formal settlement sites. consensus could be found for a settlement, that Data is collected on a monthly basis through The REACH team consistently covered Population Movement and settlement was not included in reporting. key informant interviews from settlements Panyikang, Malakal, Fashoda, Manyo, Ulang Data was analyzed at the county level using across the region. To ensure information and Nasir counties from October to December Displacement descriptive statistics and geospatial analysis. provided on settlements was current, REACH 2018 (Map 1). Improved security and family reunification- Only counties with interview coverage of at 2 interviewed KIs who were either new arrivals In the fourth quarter of 2018, REACH driven movement least 5% of all settlements in a given month were included in analysis. Due to access and from the assessed settlement or had contacted interviewed 490 key informants (KIs) from In the fourth quarter of 2018, localised operational constraints, the specific settlements an individual from there within the last month. 188 settlements in six counties of UNS. This confidence-building measures implemented by assessed within each county each month vary. data was supplemented with thirteen focus # of key informant interviews conducted: 490 armed actors across parts of UNS supporting In order to reduce the likelihood that variations group discussions (FGDs) conducted with 1 in data are attributable to coverage differences, # of assessed settlements: 188 free movement, coupled with seasonal road new arrivals from Fashoda, Manyo, Malakal passability during the dry season, contributed to over time analyses were only conducted for # of counties covered: 6 (of 12) and Panyikang counties in Malakal Protection counties with at least 70% consistent payam3 an apparent increase of population movements # of focus group discussions conducted: 13 of Civilians (PoC) site on displacement, food coverage over the period. toward family reunification (Map 2). However, 1. Reported by UNMISS and humanitarian partners to an Inter-Cluster Working Group (ICWG) in Malakal, December 2018; WFP, First River Convoy in Five Years, October 2018. 2. To calculate the percentage of AoK coverage, the total number of settlements per county is based on OCHA settlement lists in addition to new settlements mapped by KIs reached each month. 3. Payams are the administrative unit at the sub-county level in South Sudan. cross-border movement appears to be mixed share reporting their primary motivation being Aburoc in Fashoda County reportedly also saw Food, water and service-driven movement and driven by an array of push and pull factors family reunification (28% in December).6 This some new arrivals from South Kordofan in this In the fourth quarter, movement to access as outlined in subsequent sections. movement was likely augmented by the return period (940 individuals between November services continued in UNS (Map 2). Primary of seasonal labourers who completed the sim and December).8 Some households returning Parts of southeastern UNS saw increasing data suggested that displacement was higher sim and sorghum harvests in Sudan in late by way of Malakal PoC site and Aburoc may movement into settlements outside of primary in Fashoda County: In December, 14% of December.7 Some additional cross-border have merely used them as family reunification population centres. During this period, assessed settlements reported a large-scale movement may have been due to push factors hubs before select, largely able-bodied male, humanitarian partners have noted self-reported displacement out of the settlement in the last such as poor conditions in refugee camps in household members proceeded to settlements- spontaneous returns from neighbouring three months. Most of this movement from Sudan, see ‘food, water and service-driven of-origin to assess security and available Ethiopia into Ulang, Maiwut and Longochok Fashoda County settlements was likely to other movement’ section for more details. services.9 counties. Whilst initial information suggests areas of the county as, of assessed Fashoda that this inflow back into South Sudan may Map 2: Movement into and out of UNS, October-December 2018 County settlements with IDPs who had arrived also be partly driven by insecurity in refugee Sudan in the last three months, the largest share camps in Gambella, more data is needed to (67%) reported that these IDPs had relocated better understand these movement dynamics, Insecuritydrien oeent from other settlements within Fashoda County. Refuee cap conditiondrien oeent including their scale. Of concern to returnees’ Reflectively, due to continued water shortage, Manyo !enk aily reunificationdrien oeent Omar! vulnerability is that all three counties have been ood and lielihoodsdrien oeent 378 individuals were displaced out of Aburoc ! Water shortaedrien oeent classified as IPC Phase 4 (‘Emergency’) as of Wadekona in Fashoda County between November and 4 Renk County oundary September 2018, indicating very high levels of State oundary December to Lul and Kodok (Fashoda County), food insecurity. International oundary Wau Shilluk and Malakal PoC site (Malakal ! County capital County) and to Sudan.10 In addition to the Movement continued from the White Nile Sudan ! Settleent water challenges in Aburoc, Fashoda County region of Sudan toward central UNS and the Ô Protection of Ciilians (PoC) site ! aka saw declining access to food in this period western bank in this quarter. REACH port ! Melut ! (0% of assessed Fashoda County settlements and road monitoring in Renk Town tracks elal Aak horogwang reported adequate access to food in December population flows between and through Renk !Aburoc as compared with 29% in October), which and Sudan. Data from this activity suggests Malakal Fashoda!odok Maban ul may have further contributed to evidenced Unity ! a net population inflow as opposed to a net From Ben Wau Shilluk! Upper Nile tiu PoC displacement. For more details see the food, outflow over the fourth quarter, with an average site Panyikang onga ÔÆ Malakal ! !Dor security, and livelihoods section of this SO. of 37 individuals entering South Sudan versus ! ! Baliet New Fangak one individual exiting per day (with the intention Owachi Food insecurity and livelihoods also motivated Fangak Longochuk Ethiopia to permanently stay) in December, though outflows from UNS in the fourth quarter. Data Jonglei not all entry points to Renk are monitored from REACH Renk port and road monitoring Nasir 5 Maiwut systematically. Inflows to South Sudan via Ulang ! demonstrated that 32% of households leaving etome ! Maiwut Renk town primarily reported Melut, Maban and Pagak! South Sudan through Renk in December were Fashoda counties as well as to Malakal PoC ikou! motivated by a lack of food or jobs in their 11 site as their final destinations, with the largest Wanding! previous settlements.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UNMISS “Protection of Civilians” (Poc) Sites
    UNMISS “Protection of Civilians” (PoC) Sites As of 9 April, the estimated number of civilians seeking safety in six Protection of Civilians (PoC) sites located on UNMISS bases is 117,604 including 52,908 in Bentiu, 34,420 in Juba UN House, 26,596 in Malakal, 2,374 in Bor, 944 in Melut and 362 in Wau. Number of civilians seeking protection STATE LOCATION Central UN House PoC I, II and III 34,420 Equatoria Juba Jonglei Bor 2,374 Upper Nile Malakal 26,596 Melut 944 Unity Bentiu 52,908 Western Bahr Wau 362 El Ghazal TOTAL 117,604 Activities in Protection Sites Juba, UN House The refugee agency in collaboration with the South Sudanese Commission for Refugee Affairs will be looking into issuing Asylum seeker certificates to around 500 foreign nationals at UN House PoC Site from 9 to 15 April. ADDITIONAL LINKS ­ CLICK THE LINKS WEBSITE UNMISS accommodating 4,500 new IDPS in Malakal http://bit.ly/1JD4C4E Children immunized against measles in Bentiu http://bit.ly/1O63Ain Education needs peace, UNICEF Ambassador says in Yambio http://bit.ly/1CH51wX Food coming through Sudan helping hundreds of thousands http://bit.ly/1FBHHmw PHOTO UN Photo http://www.unmultimedia.org/s/photo/detail/627/0627829.html http://www.unmultimedia.org/s/photo/detail/627/0627828.html http://www.unmultimedia.org/s/photo/detail/627/0627831.html UNMISS facebook albums: https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.817801171628889.1073742395.160839527325060&type=3 https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.818162894926050.1073742396.160839527325060&type=3 UNMISS flickr album:
    [Show full text]
  • EOI Mission Template
    United Nations Nations Unies United Nation Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) South Sudan REQUEST FOR EXPRESSION OF INTEREST (EOI) This notice is placed on behalf of UNMISS. United Nations Procurement Division (UNPD) cannot provide any warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of contents of furnished information; and is unable to answer any enquiries regarding this EOI. You are therefore requested to direct all your queries to United Nation Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) using the fax number or e-mail address provided below. Title of the EOI: Provision of Refrigerant Gases to UNMISS in Juba, Bor, Bentiu, Malakal, Wau, Kuajok, Rumbek, Aweil, Torit and Yambio, Republic of South Sudan Date of this EOI: 10 January 2020 Closing Date for Receipt of EOI: 11 February 2020 EOI Number: EOIUNMISS17098 Chief Procurement Officer Unmiss Hq, Tomping Site Near Juba Address EOI response by fax or e-mail to the Attention of: International Airport, Room No 3c/02 Juba, Republic Of South Sudan Fax Number: N/A E-mail Address: [email protected], [email protected] UNSPSC Code: 24131513 DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENTS PD/EOI/MISSION v2018-01 1. The United Nations Mission in the Republic of South Sudan (UNMISS) has a requirement for the provision of Refrigerant Gases in Juba, Bor, Bentiu, Malakal, Wau, Kuajok, Rumbek, Aweil, Torit and Yambio, Republic of South Sudan and hereby solicits Expression of Interest (EOI) from qualified and interested vendors. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS / INFORMATION (IF ANY) Conditions: 2. Interested service providers/companies are invited to submit their EOIs for consideration by email (preferred), courier or by hand delivery as indicated below.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH SUDAN, YEAR 2017: Update on Incidents According to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) Compiled by ACCORD, 18 June 2018
    SOUTH SUDAN, YEAR 2017: Update on incidents according to the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) compiled by ACCORD, 18 June 2018 Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality Number of reported fatalities National borders: GADM, November 2015a; administrative divisions: GADM, November 2015b; Abyei Area: SSNBS, 1 December 2008; Ilemi triangle status and South Sudan/Sudan border status: UN Cartographic Section, October 2011; incident data: ACLED, June 2018; coastlines and inland waters: Smith and Wessel, 1 May 2015 SOUTH SUDAN, YEAR 2017: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 18 JUNE 2018 Contents Conflict incidents by category Number of Number of reported fatalities 1 Number of Number of Category incidents with at incidents fatalities Number of reported incidents with at least one fatality 1 least one fatality Battles 604 300 3351 Conflict incidents by category 2 Violence against civilians 404 299 1348 Development of conflict incidents from 2012 to 2017 2 Strategic developments 120 0 0 Riots/protests 46 1 3 Methodology 3 Remote violence 25 3 17 Conflict incidents per province 4 Non-violent activities 1 0 0 Localization of conflict incidents 4 Total 1200 603 4719 This table is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, June 2018). Disclaimer 5 Development of conflict incidents from 2012 to 2017 This graph is based on data from ACLED (datasets used: ACLED, June 2018). 2 SOUTH SUDAN, YEAR 2017: UPDATE ON INCIDENTS ACCORDING TO THE ARMED CONFLICT LOCATION & EVENT DATA PROJECT (ACLED) COMPILED BY ACCORD, 18 JUNE 2018 Methodology an incident occured, or the provincial capital may be used if only the province is known.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Covid-19 Weekly Situation
    REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN MINISTRY OF HEALTH (MOH) PUBLIC HEALTHPUBLIC EMERGENCY HEALTH EMERGENCY OPERATIONS OPERATIONS CENTRE (PHEOC) CENTRE (PHEOC) COVID-19 WEEKLY SITUATION REPORT Issue NO: 33 Reporting Period: 12-18 October 2020 (week 42) 36,740 2,655 CUMULATIVE SAMPLES TESTED CUMULATIVE RECOVERIES 2,847 CUMULATIVE CONFIRMED CASES 55 9,152 CUMULATIVE DEATHS CUMULATIVE CONTACTS LISTED FOR FOLLOW UP 1. KEY HIGHLIGHTS A cumulative total of 2,847 cases have been confirmed and 55 deaths have been recorded, with case fatality rate (CFR) of 1.9 percent including 196 imported cases as of 18 October 2020. 1 case is currently isolated in health facilities in the Country; and the National IDU has 99% percent bed occupancy available. 2,655 cases (0 new) have been discharged to date. 135 Health Care Workers have been infected since the beginning of the outbreak, with one death. 9,152cumulative contacts have been registered, of which 8,835 have completed the 14-day quarantine. Currently, 317 contacts are being followed, of these 92.1 percent (n=292) contacts were reached. 722 contacts have converted to cases to date; accounting for 25.3 percent of all confirmed cases. Cumulatively 36,740 laboratory tests have been performed with 7.7 percent positivity rate. There is cumulative total of 1,373 alerts of which 86.5 percent (n=1, 187) have been verified and sampled; Most alerts have come from Central Equatorial State (75.1 percent), Eastern Equatoria State (4.4 percent); Upper Nile State (3.2 percent) and the remaining 17.3 percent are from the other States and Administrative Areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Central African Republic (C.A.R.) Appears to Have Been Settled Territory of Chad
    Grids & Datums CENTRAL AFRI C AN REPUBLI C by Clifford J. Mugnier, C.P., C.M.S. “The Central African Republic (C.A.R.) appears to have been settled territory of Chad. Two years later the territory of Ubangi-Shari and from at least the 7th century on by overlapping empires, including the the military territory of Chad were merged into a single territory. The Kanem-Bornou, Ouaddai, Baguirmi, and Dafour groups based in Lake colony of Ubangi-Shari - Chad was formed in 1906 with Chad under Chad and the Upper Nile. Later, various sultanates claimed present- a regional commander at Fort-Lamy subordinate to Ubangi-Shari. The day C.A.R., using the entire Oubangui region as a slave reservoir, from commissioner general of French Congo was raised to the status of a which slaves were traded north across the Sahara and to West Africa governor generalship in 1908; and by a decree of January 15, 1910, for export by European traders. Population migration in the 18th and the name of French Equatorial Africa was given to a federation of the 19th centuries brought new migrants into the area, including the Zande, three colonies (Gabon, Middle Congo, and Ubangi-Shari - Chad), each Banda, and M’Baka-Mandjia. In 1875 the Egyptian sultan Rabah of which had its own lieutenant governor. In 1914 Chad was detached governed Upper-Oubangui, which included present-day C.A.R.” (U.S. from the colony of Ubangi-Shari and made a separate territory; full Department of State Background Notes, 2012). colonial status was conferred on Chad in 1920.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan: Force Protection Map As of October 2018 White Nile Sennar
    South Sudan: Force Protection map as of October 2018 White Nile Sennar The map is shown where the road require force protection for convoy and access denied. Girbanat ! Renk Manyo ! Dakona! SUDAN ! El-galhak Renk ! Kaka Melut ! ! Paloich ! Melut ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Wuntau ! ! ! ! ! ! Yida ! ! ! o Adar Bunj ! ! ! ! ! Fashoda o ! Rom ! Pariang ! ! ! ! ! Guel Guk an ! Kodok! Mab ! Malakal ! ! ! ! Akoka ! ! ! ! ! ! Biu Panyikang ! ! ! Agarak ! ! Malual ! Abiemnhom Tonga ! P ! ! o ! Malakal Baliet ! ! ! ! ! Abiemnom ! Wath Wang! Kech ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Banglai ! Aweil North ! Pul Luthni Pakoi ! Baliet Aweil ! ! !! ! Udier Bentiu Keew ! Nyinthok Gok-machar ! East Twic ! P Longochuk ! Mayom o ! Guit ! Chotbora Raga ! Wanyjok Akoc Rubkona Paguir Canal/Pigi ! Chuei ! ! Mayom ny ! Turalei ! Luakpi Warweng Chelkou Yargot ! Guit Kuon ! ! Pakor Wunrok Nhialdu ! Toch ! Aweil West ! ! Mayenjur k igi Mutthiang Fanga Canal/P ! Dome ! Nasir ! ! Ying Juong Aweil Gogrial Gogrial ! ! Nyadin ! Aroyo P ! Dindin Duar Pagil West East ! ! Ulang Maiwut Gossinga ! ! Buaw Nyirol ! Aweil Koch ! ! ! Nasser ! Gabir ! ! Liet-nhom ! Kandag! ! South ! Nyirol ! Haat ! Lankien ! ! Gogrial Ulang ! Raja Elok ! Koch Kosho ! Pagak ! ! Kull Bukteng ! AweilC entre Bar Mayen PKuajok Akop !o!Leer ! ! Ghanna Lunyaker Mayendit ! Walgak Thonyor ! Adok Ayod Pulchuol ! ! Ayod Tanyang ! Rualbet Mayendit! Jwong ! Pathai ! ! Yieth-liet Warrap ! ! ! ! Kaikuiny ! ! Sopo ! Thar-kueng ! Leer Wanding Pabuong ETHIOPIA Tonj ! Romich ! Kier Madol ! ! North !
    [Show full text]
  • RVI Local Peace Processes in Sudan.Pdf
    Rift Valley Institute ﻤﻌﻬﺪ اﻷﺨدود اﻟﻌﻇﻴم Taasisi ya Bonde Kuu ySMU vlˆ yU¬T tí Machadka Dooxada Rift 东非大裂谷研究院 Institut de la Vallée du Rift Local Peace Processes in Sudan A BASELINE STUDY Mark Bradbury John Ryle Michael Medley Kwesi Sansculotte-Greenidge Commissioned by the UK Government Department for International Development “Our sons are deceiving us... … Our soldiers are confusing us” Chief Gaga Riak Machar at Wunlit Dinka-Nuer Reconciliation Conference 1999 “You, translators, take my words... It seems we are deviating from our agenda. What I expected was that the Chiefs of our land, Dinka and Nuer, would sit on one side and address our grievances against the soldiers. I differ from previous speakers… I believe this is not like a traditional war using spears. In my view, our discussion should not concentrate on the chiefs of Dinka and Nuer, but on the soldiers, who are the ones who are responsible for beginning this conflict. “When John Garang and Riek Machar [leaders of rival SPLA factions] began fighting did we understand the reasons for their fighting? When people went to Bilpam [in Ethiopia] to get arms, we thought they would fight against the Government. We were not expecting to fight against ourselves. I would like to ask Commanders Salva Mathok & Salva Kiir & Commander Parjak [Senior SPLA Commanders] if they have concluded the fight against each other. I would ask if they have ended their conflict. Only then would we begin discussions between the chiefs of Dinka and Nuer. “The soldiers are like snakes. When a snake comes to your house day after day, one day he will bite you.
    [Show full text]
  • AREA-BASED ASSESSMENT in AREAS of RETURN OCTOBER 2019 Renk Town, Renk County, Upper Nile State, South Sudan
    AREA-BASED ASSESSMENT IN AREAS OF RETURN OCTOBER 2019 Renk Town, Renk County, Upper Nile State, South Sudan CONTEXT ASSESSED LOCATION Renk Town is located in Renk County, Upper Nile State, near South Sudan’s border SUDAN Girbanat with Sudan. Since the formation of South Sudan in 2011, Renk Town has been a major Gerger ± MANYO Renk transit point for returnees from Sudan and, since the beginning of the current conflict in Wadakona 1 2013, for internally displaced people (IDPs) fleeing conflict in Upper Nile State. RENK Renk was classified by the Integrated Phase Classification (IPC) Analysis Workshop El-Galhak Kurdit Umm Brabit in August 2019 as Phase 4 ‘Emergency’ with 50% of the population in either Phase 3 Nyik Marabat II 2 Kaka ‘Crisis’ (65,997 individuals) or Phase ‘4’ Emergency’ (28,284 individuals). Additionally, MELUT Renk was classified as Phase 5 ‘Extremely Critical’ for Global Acute Malnutrition MABAN (GAM),3 suggesting the prevalence of acute malnutrition was above the World Health Kumchuer Organisation (WHO) recommended emergency threshold with a recent REACH Multi- Suraya Hai Sector Needs Assessment (MSNA) establishing a GAM of above 30%.4 A measles Soma outbreak was declared in June 2019 and access to clean water was reportedly limited, as flagged by the Needs Analysis Working Group (NAWG) and by international NGOs 4 working on the ground. Hai Marabat I Based on the convergence of these factors causing high levels of humanitarian Emtitad Jedit Musefin need and the possibility for larger-scale returns coming to Renk County from Sudan, REACH conducted this Area-Based Assessment (ABA) in order to better understand White Hai Shati the humanitarian conditions in, and population movement dynamics to and from, Renk N e l Town.
    [Show full text]
  • World Vision South Sudan ECHO FOOD VOUCHER RAPID ASSESSMENT REPORT
    1 | P a g e World Vision South Sudan ECHO FOOD VOUCHER RAPID ASSESSMENT REPORT JUNE 2014 By: Bernard D. Togba Jr. Francis Thomas Mogga World Vision South Sudan 2 | P a g e Table of Contents Topic Page List of Tables……………………………………………………………………….………………….. 3 List of Acronyms……………………………………………………………………………………… 4 1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………..……………… 5 2. Objectives……………………………………………………………………………….…………. 6 3. Methodology……………………………………………………………………………….………. 6 3.1. Sample………………………………………………………………………………………….7 3.2. Data Management & Analysis………………………………………………………………….. 7 3.3. Limitations……………………………………………………………………………………… 7 4. Overview of Towns…………………………………………………………………………………. 8 4.1. Overview of Malakal…………………………………………………………………………… 8 4.2. Overview of Renk………………………………………………………………………………. 8 4.3. Overview of Kodok…………………………………………………………………………….. 10 4.4. Overview of Lul……………………………………………………………………………….. 10 4.5. Food Availability……………..…………………………………………………………………. 11 5. Summary Results………………………………………………………………………………………11 5.1. Key Informants……………………..……………………………………………………………..11 5.2. Traders…………………………………………………………………………………………….12 5.2.1. Business & Supply………………………………………………………………………. 13 5.2.2. Payment & Transport…………………………….……………………………………. 17 5.3. Beneficiaries………………………………………………………..…………………………….. 19 5.3.1. IDPs Perception…………………………….……..…………………………………… 19 5.3.2. General Characteristics………………………………………………………………….19 5.3.3. Household Welfare & Vulnerability………………………………..…………………… 19 6. Conclusions…………………………………………………………………………………………… 22 World Vision South Sudan 3 | P
    [Show full text]
  • Map of South Sudan
    UNITED NATIONS SOUTH SUDAN Geospatial 25°E 30°E 35°E Nyala Ed Renk Damazin Al-Fula Ed Da'ein Kadugli SUDAN Umm Barbit Kaka Paloich Ba 10°N h Junguls r Kodok Āsosa 10°N a Radom l-A Riangnom UPPER NILEBoing rab Abyei Fagwir Malakal Mayom Bentiu Abwong ^! War-Awar Daga Post Malek Kan S Wang ob Wun Rog Fangak at o Gossinga NORTHERN Aweil Kai Kigille Gogrial Nasser Raga BAHR-EL-GHAZAL WARRAP Gumbiel f a r a Waat Leer Z Kuacjok Akop Fathai z e Gambēla Adok r Madeir h UNITY a B Duk Fadiat Deim Zubeir Bisellia Bir Di Akobo WESTERN Wau ETHIOPIA Tonj Atum W JONGLEI BAHR-EL-GHAZAL Wakela h i te LAKES N Kongor CENTRAL Rafili ile Peper Bo River Post Jonglei Pibor Akelo Rumbek mo Akot Yirol Ukwaa O AFRICAN P i Lol b o Bor r Towot REPUBLIC Khogali Pap Boli Malek Mvolo Lowelli Jerbar ^! National capital Obo Tambura Amadi WESTERN Terakeka Administrative capital Li Yubu Lanya EASTERN Town, village EQUATORIAMadreggi o Airport Ezo EQUATORIA 5°N Maridi International boundary ^! Juba Lafon Kapoeta 5°N Undetermined boundary Yambio CENTRAL State (wilayah) boundary EQUATORIA Torit Abyei region Nagishot DEMOCRATIC Roue L. Turkana Main road (L. Rudolf) Railway REPUBLIC OF THE Kajo Yei Opari Lofusa 0 100 200km Keji KENYA o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 50 100mi CONGO o e The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.2 South Sudan Aviation
    2.2 South Sudan Aviation Key airport information may also be found at World Aero Data. Civil aviation falls under the authority of the Ministry of Transport and South Sudan which has been a member of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) since 10 November 2011. In 2013, the South Sudan Civil Aviation Authority was established and the aim of this statutory authority is to formally oversee and regulate the countries aviation industry, airline companies, and operations. South Sudan’s Juba International Airport (JIA) is currently the only airport receiving flights from international commercial airline carriers. The other major airports include Wau, Malakal and Rumbek. The aviation industry in general is characterized by decades of underdevelopment, little investment in infrastructure, low capacity and a poor safety record and adherence to international standards. The country is however readily accessible by air as there are hundreds of fixed wing and helicopter landing sites spread out across the country, of which more than 50 airstrips are serviceable by fixed wing aircraft. The vast majority of these strips are gravel however and only accessible by light aircraft. Only Juba, Paloich, Malakal and Wau airports currently have asphalted runways capable of handling large aircraft. The availability of fuel, aircraft maintenance facilities and handling services remains an issue, especially in remote areas. A small number of private sector operators are able to supply fuel at the various major airports, however fuel is imported from neighboring countries increasing cost and risking fuel shortages, especially during the rainy season. Basic repairs and maintenance can be conducted in South Sudan; however, major repairs have to be conducted in neighboring countries or in some cases Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN Ministry of Physical Infrastructure and Rural Development, Upper Nile State THE PROJECT FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING AND SUPPORT FOR URGENT DEVELOPMENT ON SOCIAL ECONOMIC INFRASTRUCTURE IN MALAKAL TOWN IN THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN FINAL REPORT MAIN TEXT JULY 2014 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY KATAHIRA & ENGINEERS INTERNATIONAL YACHIYO ENGINEERING CO., LTD. EI RECS INTERNATIONAL INC. JR KOKUSAI KOGYO CO., LTD. 14-122 The Project for Comprehensive Planning and Support for Urgent Development on Social Economic Infrastructure in Malakal Town in the Republic of South Sudan Project Area Malakal Air Port ✈ Outer Ring Road Ring Road Ring Nile River Nile LBT Road-1 M al ak al Ri ve LB r T Po Ro ad- MoPI&RD 3 LBT Road-1 LEGEND: ：Block Boundary ：Road ：River ：Forest ：Grassland ：Idle Land (Sand and Mud) :Shrub Urgnt Development Support Projects ：Water Treatment Plant ：Water Pipe ：Water Public Tab ：Malakal Port ：LBT Road PROJECT LOCATION MAP Final Report The Project for Comprehensive Planning and Support for Urgent Development on Social Economic Infrastructure in Malakal Town in the Republic of South Sudan Photographs Present Situation of Socio-Economic Infrastructure in Malakal Town 1 Water Treatment Plant of SSUWC Water pipes are detariorated and damaged, (Filter Tank) resulting in high ratio of non-revenue water Malakal Port (Cargo Jetty) Malakal Port (Passenger Jetty) Community Road (Black and Clayey Soil Community roads easily get muddy in rainy called Black Cotton Soil) season. LBT Construction Site (Upper
    [Show full text]