DOCSLIB.ORG

China Battery Materials

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
China Battery Materials China Materials 25 September 2020 China Battery Materials Expert call takeaways: lithium the weakest part of Tesla’s Battery Day presentation Our expert was impressed by Tesla’s new form factor, CTP, focus on capex, pilot Fremont line and differentiated cathode approach Dennis Ip, CFA Confusing cell chemistry presentation: lack of incentives for miners (852) 2848 4068 and disservice to lithium industry with over-simplification of extraction [email protected] Leo Ho Not all projects announced will come to fruition: some will over-deliver; (852) 2848 4469 some will be terminated; some new projects will come up [email protected] What’s new: We hosted an expert call with Vivas Kumar, principal at BMI China’s dominance of LiB supply chain and a former Tesla employee, who specialises in global lithium sourcing. What’s the impact: A few impressive breakthroughs. Vivas was impressed by Tesla’s development of a 46x80 form factor, cell-to-pack (CTP) cell installation, and emphasis on capex efficiency. He said some of these breakthroughs had been under way for years before his departure from Tesla in April 2019. He was also upbeat on its diversified cathode approach, which Tesla is the first in the industry to clearly outline. He was surprised by Tesla opting for silicon anode while not mentioning lithium Source: Benchmark Mineral Intelligence (BMI) metal on Battery Day. He commended the 10GWh Fremont line, which is the 13th largest battery production line in the world despite just being a Tesla: diversified cathode approach “pilot line”. He also believes Tesla already has a convincing answer to ensure safety of the larger 46x80 form factor and module-less battery pack. Confusing cell chemistry presentation. Vivas had expected Tesla to incentivise upstream miners on Battery Day, but Tesla appeared instead to have created “market friction”. The lithium part was deemed by Vivas as the weakest section. He believes Tesla’s bold claim of NaCl-based extraction (see our flash) on Battery Day did a “disservice to the lithium Source: Tesla industry” as it has over-simplified the lithium extraction and conversion processes, which led to market doubts over lithium majors, as evidenced Tesla: US cathode production by their share-price declines the day after Battery Day, rather than incentivising lithium players to mine more. Vivas also suggested that cobalt-free cathode is not quite feasible and recalled that it took 15 years of R&D before commercialisation of NCA. Moreover, Tesla provided neither a timeline for implementation nor a further explanation of the “de-risking” function of vertical integration in the US. Not all projects will be implemented. Vivas said not all 15 projects Source: Tesla announced on Battery Day will be realised eventually; some will over- deliver while some may be terminated prematurely due to capital-allocation Tesla: cell production plan concerns. Also, new projects not announced on Battery Day will come up alongside ongoing R&D. He also explained that Giga Texas (possibly with the co-location of Tesla Cathode and Tesla Lithium) rather than the Fremont factory would be the main contributor to the “100GWh in 2022”. The cell production will likely be replicated for Giga Berlin but not Giga Shanghai given the cost advantage of CATL (300750 CH) in China. What we recommend: Our top pick is Ganfeng (1772 HK, HKD36.70, Buy Source: Tesla [1], see our flash). Key risk: delay in Tesla’s execution of cell production. How we differ: We dissect the impacts of changing cell chemistry in depth. See important disclosures, including any required research certifications, beginning on page 3 China Battery Materials: 25 September 2020 Global battery production lines Source: Benchmark Mineral Intelligence (BMI) Existing LiB supply chain Future LiB supply chain Source: Benchmark Mineral Intelligence (BMI) Source: Benchmark Mineral Intelligence (BMI) Global megafactory capacity growth Global lithium chemicals supply demand balance Source: Benchmark Mineral Intelligence (BMI) Source: Benchmark Mineral Intelligence (BMI) Note: Tesla’s goal of 3TWh by 2030 has higher battery production capacity than pipelines of all Note: Shortage of lithium chemicals is possibly due to the lack of incentive pricing. other battery makers combined. 2 China Battery Materials: 25 September 2020 Important Disclosures and Disclaimer This publication is produced by Daiwa Securities Group Inc. and/or its non-U.S. affiliates, and distributed by Daiwa Securities Group Inc. and/or its non-U.S. affiliates, except to the extent expressly provided herein. This publication and the contents hereof are intended for information purposes only, and may be subject to change without further notice. Any use, disclosure, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing or reliance on this publication for any other purpose without our prior consent or approval is strictly prohibited. Neither Daiwa Securities Group Inc. nor any of its respective parent, holding, subsidiaries or affiliates, nor any of its respective directors, officers, servants and employees, represent nor warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein or as to the existence of other facts which might be significant, and will not accept any responsibility or liability whatsoever for any use of or reliance upon this publication or any of the contents hereof. Neither this publication, nor any content hereof, constitute, or are to be construed as, an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any of the securities or investments mentioned herein in any country or jurisdiction nor, unless expressly provided, any recommendation or investment opinion or advice. Any view, recommendation, opinion or advice expressed in this publication may not necessarily reflect those of Daiwa Securities Group Inc., and/or its affiliates nor any of its respective directors, officers, servants and employees except where the publication states otherwise. This research report is not to be relied upon by any person in making any investment decision or otherwise advising with respect to, or dealing in, the securities mentioned, as it does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and particular needs of any person. Daiwa Securities Group Inc., its subsidiaries or affiliates, or its or their respective directors, officers and employees from time to time have trades as principals, or have positions in, or have other interests in the securities of the company under research including market making activities, derivatives in respect of such securities or may have also performed investment banking and other services for the issuer of such securities. Daiwa Securities Group Inc., its subsidiaries or affiliates do and seek to do business with the company(s) covered in this research report. Therefore, investors should be aware that a conflict of interest may exist. The following are additional disclosures. Ownership of Securities For “Ownership of Securities” information, please visit BlueMatrix disclosure link at https://daiwa3.bluematrix.com/sellside/Disclosures.action. Investment Banking Relationship For “Investment Banking Relationship”, please visit BlueMatrix disclosure link at https://daiwa3.bluematrix.com/sellside/Disclosures.action. Japan Daiwa Securities Co. Ltd. and Daiwa Securities Group Inc. Daiwa Securities Co. Ltd. is a subsidiary of Daiwa Securities Group Inc. Investment Banking Relationship Within the preceding 12 months, the subsidiaries and/or affiliates of Daiwa Securities Group Inc. * has lead-managed public offerings and/or secondary offerings (excluding straight bonds) of the securities of the following companies: Smoore International Holdings Limited (6969 HK). *Subsidiaries of Daiwa Securities Group Inc. for the purposes of this section shall mean any one or more of: Daiwa Capital Markets Hong Kong Limited (大和資本市場香港有限公司), Daiwa Capital Markets Singapore Limited, Daiwa Capital Markets Australia Limited, Daiwa Capital Markets India Private Limited, Daiwa-Cathay Capital Markets Co., Ltd., Daiwa Securities Capital Markets Korea Co., Ltd. Hong Kong This research is distributed in Hong Kong by Daiwa Capital Markets Hong Kong Limited (大和資本市場香港有限公司) (“DHK”) which is regulated by the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission. Recipients of this research in Hong Kong may contact DHK in respect of any matter arising from or in connection with this research. Relevant Relationship (DHK) DHK may from time to time have an individual employed by or associated with it serves as an officer of any of the companies under its research coverage. Singapore This research is distributed in Singapore by Daiwa Capital Markets Singapore Limited and it may only be distributed in Singapore to accredited investors, expert investors and institutional investors as defined in the Financial Advisers Regulations and the Securities and Futures Act (Chapter 289), as amended from time to time. By virtue of distribution to these category of investors, Daiwa Capital Markets Singapore Limited and its representatives are not required to comply with Section 36 of the Financial Advisers Act (Chapter 110) (Section 36 relates to disclosure of Daiwa Capital Markets Singapore Limited’s interest and/or its representative’s interest in securities). Recipients of this research in Singapore may contact Daiwa Capital Markets Singapore Limited in respect of any matter arising from or in connection with the research. Australia This research is distributed in Australia by Daiwa Capital Markets Australia
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Giga Annual Report 2017
    GIGA ANNUAL REPORT 2017 GIGA ANNUAL REPORT 2017 PREFACE Dear Readers It is with great pleasure that I present to you our Annual Report for 2017. The last few years of our hard work seem to be paying off, evident most strongly in our academic output and accolades. Our scholars won several prestigious prizes in 2017, which represent significant firsts for the GIGA. Just one example is the Leibniz Dissertation Award, for which our promising doctoral students had already received recognition in the past by being on the shortlist – no mean achievement in itself. This year, for the first time, a GIGA doctoral student is a recipient of this prize. Another un­ precedented development was the dramatic increase in the quality of our already strong publications: over 40% of our articles are now in the category of “A journals,” and our researchers have also started publishing books with prestigious university presses. In commitment to the Leibniz motto of “theoria cum praxi”, we have tried to ensure that our research makes a useful contribution to the real world. The G20 Summit in Hamburg provided us with a valuable opportunity to prove our strengths in this regard. We were involved in different parts of the official outreach processes. Through a series of events, we also engaged in dissemination and engagement with the informed public in Hamburg and beyond. Our research on the subject was picked up by politicians, and was also featured in some top national and international media outlets. The Institute is growing and evolving, also via our updated recruitment procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • | Large-Scale Investment
    | LARGE-SCALE INVESTMENT With the arrival of the long awaited Berlin-Brandenburg Airport in October 3. Technology and Science Region Dahme-Spreewald 2020, the municipalities of south Berlin are forecast to be the fastest growing locations in the greater city region. The new airport began stimulating The technology and science region of Dahme-Spreewald is an up-and-coming location economic activity long before it actually opened its doors, and some for high-tech production, intelligent services, research and training. investments are now completed and fully operational while others are still in the works. In the field of aviation, a significant number of firms have already clustered around the city's new airport. From global players to innovative medium-sized companies – this is now the third largest aviation location in Germany, with more than 100 companies and 1. Berlin-Brandenburg Airport (BER) 17,000 employees. With a total investment value of EUR7 billion, Wildau Technical University of Applied Sciences the Berlin-Brandenburg Airport is now open With 100 full-time professors, approximately 4,000 students per annum are trained in and fully operational. While COVID-19 has more than 30 study programmes. This is the largest university of applied sciences in stifled demand for aviation and air travel the state of Brandenburg. services globally, the airport is expected to reach its maximum capacity of 27 million Aerospace Technology Centre passengers per annum in the next few years. The Aerospace Technology Centre - where innovation is at home - is one of the largest Expansion plans are already underway, aviation technology locations in Brandenburg.
    [Show full text]
  • TSLA Q3 2020 Update
    Q3 2020 Update Highlights 03 Financial Summary 04 Operational Summary 06 Vehicle Capacity 07 Core Technology 08 Other Highlights 09 Outlook 10 Battery Day Highlights 11 Photos & Charts 13 Financial Statements 23 Additional Information 28 H I G H L I G H T S S U M M A R Y Cash $5.9B increase in our cash and cash equivalents in Q3 to $14.5B The third quarter of 2020 was a record quarter on many levels. Over the past four quarters, we generated over $1.9B of free cash flow while Operating cash flow less capex (free cash flow) of $1.4B in Q3 spending $2.4B on new production capacity, service centers, Supercharging locations and other capital investments. While we took additional SBC expense in Q3, our GAAP operating margin reached 9.2%. We are increasingly focused on our next phase of growth. Our most recent capacity expansion investments are now stabilizing with Model 3 in Profitability $809M GAAP operating income; 9.2% operating margin in Q3 Shanghai achieving its designed production rate and Model Y in Fremont expected to reach capacity-level production soon. $331M GAAP net income; $874M non-GAAP net income (ex-SBC) in Q3 During this next phase, we are implementing more ambitious architectural SBC expense increased to $543M (driven by 2018 CEO award milestones) changes to our products and factories to improve manufacturing cost and efficiency. We are also expanding our scope of manufacturing to include additional areas of insourcing. At Tesla Battery Day, we announced our plans to manufacture battery cells in-house to aid in our rapid expansion plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Tesla News Sources
    Best Tesla News Sources This is part of my Tesla series. To read all articles in this series click here. Tesla Gigafactory Berlin-Brandenburg, currently under construction. To me, Tesla is one of the most fascinating companies on the planet. They are at the forefront of the world’s transition to sustainable energy and autonomous mobility, a multi-trillion dollar market. Also, Tesla is not just one company. They are basically a collection of startups. Most people don’t take the time to understand the company. This is why people often misunderstand Tesla. I don’t blame them. It’s very time-consuming to do so. If you want to start to understand the company, you need to rent a Model 3 or Model Y for a weekend (or better, for a week or month). You really cannot understand the company if you have never experienced the product. And then, after you’ve done that, here is my collection of the best Tesla news sources to keep up to date: YouTube / Podcasts Solving The Money Problem (investment focus, daily videos) Munro Live (engineering focus) Tesla Daily (high quality daily news) HyperChange (investment focus) Twitter @elonmusk (CEO, Tesla) @vincent13031925 (General & China news) @Ray4Tesla (China news) @alex_avoigt (Giga Berlin) @tobilindh (Giga Berlin) Newsletters ARK Invest (research focused on disruptive technologies) HyperChange (paid newsletter, once per week) Linkedin Herbert Diess (CEO, Volkswagen Group) e.g. How we transform Volkswagen Jerome Guillen (President Automotive at Tesla) Drew Baglino (SVP Powertrain and Energy Engineering at Tesla) Websites Electrek Tesmanian Teslarati CleanTechnica Quarterly Updates Quarterly Webcast and Financial Reports by Tesla Join 1500+ subscribers to receive updates on personal growth, mental health and financial freedom: Subscribe Bonus: After signing up, you will receive my exclusive Good Life Checklist with actionable ideas on how to improve your life.
    [Show full text]
  • June 25, 2021 – No
    Shmuel De-Leon Energy - Battery Weekly Newsletter June 25, 2021, No. 599 Sent to Battery industry members since 1/2010, Join our mailing list Battery Industry Upcoming updated list Battery market reports 2021 Our advertisers & sponsors Virtual Battery Trainings 28-30/6/2021 EV & ESS High Voltage Battery Pack Design Virtual Seminar (5 hours - 2 parts of 2.5 hours each) - 16:00 PM Central Europe Time, 10:00 AM EST USA Time - Program and registration 12-15/7/2021 Battery Virtual Seminar (8 hours - 4 parts of 2 hours each) - 16:00 PM Central Europe Time, 10:00 AM EST USA Time - Program and registration Frontal Battery Training Special Offers Shmuel De-Leon Energy provides an on-demand purchasing services for cells and batteries from all chemistries and vendors Shmuel De-Leon Energy provide a new Battery Daily News Service - Sign up fr free 30 days trial Shmuel De-Leon Energy start to sell new High Energy Density Li-ion pouch cells with 330Wh/kg, 10Ah, 4.48V charging voltage, max discharge current 0.4C, 150 cycles - Purchasing the cells require to sign an NDA with the cell maker. Contact us for more details [email protected] Batteries and Super Capacitors news Electrovaya Announces Litarion Settlement CATL-SC officially launches operation of first phase of traction battery production project Increasing electric car battery safety using calorimeters Battery cell supply for electric 2-wheel vehicles falling short Geely-Owned Volvo to Develop Electric-Vehicle Batteries With Northvolt Lithion Battery Is Building a State-of-the-Art Facility Dedicated
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae of Gerald Schneider
    Curriculum Vitae of Gerald Schneider Date and place of birth: Zürich, April 14, 1962 Citizenship: Swiss Family status: Married, two adult children Office Address Home Address Department of Politics and Public Administration Im Grün 5 University of Konstanz 78465 Konstanz Box 86 78457 Konstanz Germany Phone: + 49 7531 / 88-2608 +49 7531 / 943 785 Fax: + 49 7531 / 88-2774 Email: [email protected] INTERNET ID AND RESEARCH PROFILE http://www.polver.uni-konstanz.de/gschneider/home/ https://publons.com/researcher/1577094/gerald-schneider/ http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=HC8Qk9UAAAAJ&hl=en orcid.org/0000-0002-0091-6217 Scopus Author ID: 55057826200 WoS ResearcherID: A-1903-2012 EDUCATION 1991 Dr. Phil I, University of Zürich (Political Science) 1988 lic. Phil. I (M.A.), University of Zürich (Political Science, Economics, History) 1983 Journalist BR 1981 Matura Typus C, Gymnasium Im Lee, Winterthur, Switzerland TEACHING International Relations, Regional Integration and European Union Decision Making, Comparative Politics, especially Comparative Foreign Policy; Peace and Conflict; Evaluation Research; Research Design, Quantitative and Formal Research Methods. RESEARCH Political Integration; Peace and Conflict; Negotiation and Mediation; Comparative Institutional Analysis; Political Reform; Political Decision-Making LANGUAGES German (native tongue), French (fluent), English (fluent), Italian (fair), Danish (fair) EMPLOYMENT 1997- present Professor of Political Science (C4), University of Konstanz 2 1996-1997 Professor of Political Science (C3), University of Stuttgart. 1995-1996 Visiting Professor (C3/C4), University of Konstanz. 1994-1997 Program Director/Assistant Professor, University of Berne. 1992-1995 Assistant Professor, Institut universitaire de hautes études internationales/ Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva. 1989-1991 Zürich Business School, Part-time Lecturer.
    [Show full text]
  • WMG (Warwick Manufacturing Group), University of Warwick – Written Evidence (BAT0014)
    WMG (Warwick Manufacturing Group), University of Warwick – Written evidence (BAT0014) About WMG WMG is an academic department at the University of Warwick and an international role model for successful collaboration between academia and the public and private sectors, driving innovation in applied science, technology and engineering. As one of the largest academic departments at the University of Warwick and the lead centre for the High Value Manufacturing Catapult strategic objectives of Vehicle Electrification and Connected and Autonomous Vehicles (CAV); WMG is a leading multidisciplinary group, making a real impact through both collaborative R&D and world-class education. 1. To what extent are battery and fuel cell technologies currently contributing to decarbonisation efforts in the UK? • What are the primary applications of battery and fuel cell technologies for decarbonisation, and at what scale have they been deployed? There are several primary uses for battery technologies for decarbonisation. The first is the electrification of vehicles, ranging from personal vehicles to public transport and commercial transport. In personal vehicles, battery technology has already reached mass adoption, with 13.4% of new vehicles registered so far in 2021 being either Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles (PHEV) or fully Electric vehicles. This increases to 37% of New Vehicles having some form of battery power, when Hybrid (HEV and Mild-Hybrid Vehicles (MHEV) are included1. As you extend from personal to commercial, niche and specialist vehicles, we are seeing the development of EVs in the Construction, Freight, delivery and public transport systems, with product ranging from mini-diggers2, to vans, trucks, busses, and very light rail3.
    [Show full text]
  • Tesla Als Start-Up in Der Automobilbranche. Vom
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Clausen, Jens; Olteanu, Yasmin Working Paper Tesla als Start-up in der Automobilbranche: Vom Pleitekandidat zum Gamechanger Working Paper Forschungsförderung, No. 199 Provided in Cooperation with: The Hans Böckler Foundation Suggested Citation: Clausen, Jens; Olteanu, Yasmin (2020) : Tesla als Start-up in der Automobilbranche: Vom Pleitekandidat zum Gamechanger, Working Paper Forschungsförderung, No. 199, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/228962 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially
    [Show full text]
  • Der Senat Stellungnahme Zum German
    Der Senat 9. Juli 2015 Stellungnahme zum German Institute of Global and Area Studies – Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien, Hamburg (GIGA) Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Beurteilung und Empfehlungen ......................................................... 2 2. Zur Stellungnahme des GIGA ............................................................ 4 3. Förderempfehlung ........................................................................ 4 Anlage A: Darstellung Anlage B: Bewertungsbericht Anlage C: Stellungnahme der Einrichtung zum Bewertungsbericht Stellungnahme zum GIGA 2 Vorbemerkung Die Einrichtungen der Forschung und der wissenschaftlichen Infrastruktur, die sich in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft zusammengeschlossen haben, werden von Bund und Ländern wegen ihrer überregionalen Bedeutung und eines gesamtstaatlichen wissenschaftspoli- tischen Interesses gemeinsam gefördert. Turnusmäßig, spätestens alle sieben Jahre, überprüfen Bund und Länder, ob die Voraussetzungen für die gemeinsame Förderung einer Leibniz-Einrichtung noch erfüllt sind.1 Die wesentliche Grundlage für die Überprüfung in der Gemeinsamen Wissenschaftskon- ferenz ist regelmäßig eine unabhängige Evaluierung durch den Senat der Leibniz- Gemeinschaft. Die Stellungnahmen des Senats bereitet der Senatsausschuss Evaluierung vor. Für die Bewertung einer Einrichtung setzt der Ausschuss Bewertungsgruppen mit unabhängigen, fachlich einschlägigen Sachverständigen ein. Vor diesem Hintergrund besuchte eine Bewertungsgruppe am 30. September und 1. Ok- tober 2014 das German Institute
    [Show full text]
  • GIGA Annual Report 2017
    www.ssoar.info GIGA Annual Report 2017 Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Tätigkeitsbericht, Jahresbericht / annual report Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies - Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien. (2018). GIGA Annual Report 2017. (GIGA Jahresberichte). Hamburg. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-57740-6 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Deposit-Lizenz (Keine This document is made available under Deposit Licence (No Weiterverbreitung - keine Bearbeitung) zur Verfügung gestellt. Redistribution - no modifications). We grant a non-exclusive, non- Gewährt wird ein nicht exklusives, nicht übertragbares, transferable, individual and limited right to using this document. persönliches und beschränktes Recht auf Nutzung dieses This document is solely intended for your personal, non- Dokuments. Dieses Dokument ist ausschließlich für commercial use. All of the copies of this documents must retain den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen Gebrauch bestimmt. all copyright information and other information regarding legal Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments müssen alle protection. You are not allowed to alter this document in any Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise auf gesetzlichen way, to copy it for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses Dokument document in public, to perform, distribute or otherwise use the nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen Sie document in public. dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder conditions of use. anderweitig nutzen.
    [Show full text]
  • GM Vs. Tesla Before in August of 2020 "GM Vs
    10.07.21, 08:10 Seite 1 von 30 Editors' Pick Long Ideas Consumer The GM-Tesla Market Value Gap Will Shrink Significantly By 2025 Jul. 05, 2021 11:50 AM ET | General Motors Company (GM) | TSLA | 82 Comments | 12 Likes Summary GM versus Tesla by the numbers shows GM's 2025 potential. GM's 1 million+ EV sales by 2025 goal will be a challenge for Tesla to match. The Ultium battery modular design could be another long-term advantage. The Cruise AV (Autonomous Vehicle) adds to GM's value. BrightDrop is a GM product that already has FedEx as a customer. Looking for more investing ideas like this one? Get 10.07.21, 08:10 Seite 2 von 30 them exclusively at Turnaround Stock Advisory. Learn More » Michael Vi/iStock Editorial via Getty Images As General Motors (GM) continues its very aggressive EV push, the disparity between GM and Tesla's (TSLA) MV (Market Value) becomes more apparent. While Tesla's current EV market leadership is undeniable, GM's $35 billion spending commitment to transition to EVs by 2025 indicates the battle is on for EV primacy. Justifying the difference between GM's $80 billion MV and Tesla's $400 billion will become more difficult as time moves forward. I have written about GM vs. Tesla before in August of 2020 "GM Vs. Tesla: Buy GM If You Have A 5-Year Plan. My first summary point in that article was this: • GM's price can easily double from here but Tesla's maybe not so easy. 10.07.21, 08:10 Seite 3 von 30 Since that article was published on August 30, 2020, GM's stock has gone from $29.63 to $58.76, a gain of 98% while Tesla's price has gone from $498.32 to $623.31, a gain of 25%.
    [Show full text]
  • 特斯拉（Tsla.O）2019 年报点评 证券研究报告 2020 年 02 月 03 日
    海外行业报告 | 行业专题研究 特斯拉（TSLA.O）2019 年报点评 证券研究报告 2020 年 02 月 03 日 作者 Model 3产销两旺助力千亿市值，国产替代机遇 邓学 分析师 SAC 执业证书编号：S1110518010001 事件：北京时间 1 月 30 日凌晨，特斯拉（TSLA.O）发布了 2019 年第四季 [email protected] 度财务报告：Q4 实现营业收入 73.8 亿美元，同比上升 2.2%；营业利润 3.6 亿美元，同比下降 13.2%；归母净利润 1.05 亿美元，同比下降 25%。全年 公司营业收入增长 14.5%至 245.8 亿美元，营业亏损为 6900 万美元，较上 年同期减少 3.2 亿美元。归母净亏损 8.6 亿美元，同比下降 11.7%。第四季 度自由现金流 10.1 亿美元，环比增长 173%。 点评： 四季度和全年毛利有所上升，汽车板块毛利率超预期。特斯拉 2019Q4 实 现毛利 13.91 亿美元，同比下降 3.6%，环比上升 16.79%，主要是汽车业务 毛利提升；全年毛利 40.69 亿美元，同比上升 0.67%。Q4 毛利率为 18.8%， 环比 Q3 有小幅下降，其中汽车业务毛利率在上海超级工厂投产增加折旧 和摊销的基础上，仍保持在 22.5%的高水平；全年毛利率 16.6%，同比下降 2.3%，汽车业务毛利率为 21.2%，同比下降 2.2%，主要受汽车租赁比重提高， Model 3 销量占比提高和 ASP 下调影响。 四季度销量创纪录，Model 3 热销，新订单占比高，展望 Model Y。根据 财报显示，特斯拉 2019Q4 实现交付 112,095 辆，同比上升 23.6%，其中 Model 3 为 92,620 辆，同比上升 46.7%，全球库存周转天数再创新低，仅 为 11 天；2019 全年交付量为 367,295 辆，同比上升 50.0%，其中 Model 3 交付创新高，同比增长 106.5%，2019 年多数订单为新买家，在未有广告费 用的前提下，预计 2020 年销量会在 Model Y 和上海超级工厂的推动下继 续上升；Model S 和 X 销量乏力，交付同比下降 32.9%，总交付达成全年 36 万最低交付目标。预计特斯拉 2020 年全球销量约为 50-60 万辆，2021 年约为 90 万辆。预计 2021 年，Model Y 交付 12.5 万，在手订单超 20 万 辆，交付提前，预计第三季度所有配置车型均可交付。 产能有望持续扩张，产能布局全球化拓展。美国 Fremont 工厂方面，目前 Model Y 处于产能爬坡阶段，预计 2020Q1 末开始交付。2020 年加州工厂， Model 3 和 Y 总年产能达到 40 万辆，后续产能将继续扩张，生产车间增加 额外设备，预计 2020 年中，达到 50 万年产能；上海工厂方面，随着零部 件国产化提升将会带来毛利率的改善，上海工厂产能有望大幅增长，Model 3 和电池组生产持续爬坡，二期工程已破土动工，鉴于 SUV 车型热销，未 来 Model Y 产能至少与 Model 3 持平，Model Y 生产进度提前，产能爬坡 开始于 2020 年 1 月；柏林-勃兰登堡工厂已经进入准备阶段，第一批车辆 交付预计在 2021 年开始。 储能业务需求强劲，全年装机量再创新高，同比增长 58.8%。在光伏和储 能业务方面，2019Q4 特斯拉的光伏发电装机量为 54MW，环比上升 25.6%； 储能装机量达到历史新高 530MWh，同比上升 135.6%，环比上升 11.1%。 2019 全年储能装机量 1.65GWh，超过其他年份的总和，预计
    [Show full text]