DOCSLIB.ORG

Missouri State Rail Plan I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Missouri State Rail Plan I State Rail Plan May 2012 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction and Vision ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Historical Highlights of Rail in Missouri ...................................................................... 2 1.2 Overview of Rail in Missouri Today ........................................................................... 2 1.3 The Benefits of Rail .................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Federal Requirements ............................................................................................... 5 1.5 Vision for Missouri Rail Service ................................................................................. 8 1.6 Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................ 8 1.7 Organization of the Plan .......................................................................................... 10 2.0 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Freight Rail System Profile ...................................................................................... 12 2.2 Freight Rail Traffic ................................................................................................... 16 2.3 Passenger Service Profile ....................................................................................... 19 2.4 Railroad Safety ........................................................................................................ 23 3.0 Economic Conditions and Forecast..................................................................................... 25 4.0 Evaluation of Missouri’s Rail Capacity ................................................................................ 31 4.1 Existing Capacity Generation Methodology ............................................................. 31 4.2 Future Capacity Generation Methodology ............................................................... 36 5.0 Previous Plans and Studies ................................................................................................ 39 5.1 Statewide Plans and Programs ............................................................................... 40 5.2 Regional Plans and Studies .................................................................................... 41 5.3 Multi-State and National Plans and Studies ............................................................. 42 6.0 Funding and Organizational Opportunities .......................................................................... 44 6.1 State Legislation and Funding Supporting Passenger Rail Projects ........................ 44 6.2 Federal Legislation and Funding Supporting Passenger Rail Projects ..................... 49 6.3 Federal Capital Funding for High Speed & Intercity Passenger Rail Improvements ......................................................................................................... 51 6.4 Public Private Partnerships ..................................................................................... 54 6.5 Rail Program Organization in Other States .............................................................. 55 Missouri State Rail Plan i 7.0 Outreach Activities ............................................................................................................ 58 7.1 Goals and Objectives .............................................................................................. 58 7.2 Stakeholder Database ............................................................................................. 58 7.3 Community Workshops and Public Meetings – Round One..................................... 59 7.4 Public Meetings – Round Two ................................................................................. 65 7.5 Surveys ................................................................................................................... 69 7.6 Project Website, Newsletters and Social Media ....................................................... 71 7.7 Media Coverage ..................................................................................................... 71 8.0 Investment Packages Proposed and Evaluated ................................................................. 72 8.1 Benefits of Preserving Current Service .................................................................... 73 8.2 Investment Packages .............................................................................................. 74 8.3 Economic Impacts of Rail System Investment ......................................................... 77 8.4 Societal Benefits from Investing in Missouri’s Rail System ...................................... 79 8.5 Comparative Benefits of Investment Packages ....................................................... 80 8.6 Conclusions ............................................................................................................ 82 9.0 Other Societal Benefits of Rail Investments ....................................................................... 84 9.1 Environmental Considerations ................................................................................. 84 9.2 Transportation ......................................................................................................... 87 9.3 Land Use and Community Resources ..................................................................... 87 9.4 Noise and Vibration ................................................................................................. 90 9.5 Other Environmental Considerations ....................................................................... 91 9.6 Summary of Environmental Considerations ............................................................. 92 9.7 Regional Balance .................................................................................................... 92 10.0 Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 94 10.1 Strategies for Passenger and Freight Rail Policy Development ............................ 94 10.2 Proposed Policies for Passenger and Freight Rail Development in Missouri ......... 95 Missouri State Rail Plan ii LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Missouri State Rail Plan Compliance with Federal Rail Plan Requirements .............. 6 Table 2: Railroads Operating in Missouri .............................................................................. 14 Table 3: Rail Inbound Dependency for Missouri Industries ................................................... 17 Table 4: Rail Internal Dependency for Missouri Industries .................................................... 18 Table 5: Rail Export Dependency for Missouri Industries ...................................................... 19 Table 6: Total Missouri Passenger Rail Ridership by Rail Line and Fiscal Year .................... 22 Table 7: Imports to Missouri by Commodity Group (2011-2031) - Domestic and International Combined ..................................................................................................................... 26 Table 8: Exports from Missouri by Commodity Group (2011-2031) - Domestic and International Combined ................................................................................................. 27 Table 9: Imports to Missouri by Origin (2011-2031) - Domestic and International Combined 28 Table 10: Exports from Missouri by Destination (2011-2031) - Domestic and International Combined ..................................................................................................................... 28 Table 11: Employment Trend and Forecast for Missouri Industries ...................................... 29 Table 12: Average Capacity of Freight Rail Corridors (Trains per Day) ................................. 33 Table 13: Volume to Capacity Ratio and Level of Service Grades ........................................ 34 Table 14: Previous Rail Plans and Studies ........................................................................... 39 Table 15: MoDOT Rail Program Revenue Contributions from Missouri Railroads................. 46 Table 16: Annual State Operating Support for Amtrak Missouri River Runner Service ...... 47 Table 17: Federal Rail Grant Awards to Missouri 2007 - 2011 .............................................. 53 Table 18: Round 1 Public Meetings ..................................................................................... 59 Table 19: Round Two Public Meetings ................................................................................. 65 Table 20: Description of Investment Packages ..................................................................... 75 Table 21: Proposed Investment in Missouri’s Economy ........................................................ 77 Table 22: Net Economic Impact of Investment Scenarios after Tax Impact .......................... 78 Table 23: Estimated User Benefits of Passenger Rail Investment Packages ........................ 82 Table 24: Proposed 20-Year Program – Missouri Rail Projects, Priorities and Strategies Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 102 Missouri State Rail Plan iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Missouri Railroad Existing Network .......................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the National Archives
    REFERENCE INFORMATION PAPER 116 Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the national archives 1 Records Relating to Railroads in the Cartographic Section of the National Archives REFERENCE INFORMATION PAPER 116 National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC Compiled by Peter F. Brauer 2010 United States. National Archives and Records Administration. Records relating to railroads in the cartographic section of the National Archives / compiled by Peter F. Brauer.— Washington, DC : National Archives and Records Administration, 2010. p. ; cm.— (Reference information paper ; no 116) includes index. 1. United States. National Archives and Records Administration. Cartographic and Architectural Branch — Catalogs. 2. Railroads — United States — Armed Forces — History —Sources. 3. United States — Maps — Bibliography — Catalogs. I. Brauer, Peter F. II. Title. Cover: A section of a topographic quadrangle map produced by the U.S. Geological Survey showing the Union Pacific Railroad’s Bailey Yard in North Platte, Nebraska, 1983. The Bailey Yard is the largest railroad classification yard in the world. Maps like this one are useful in identifying the locations and names of railroads throughout the United States from the late 19th into the 21st century. (Topographic Quadrangle Maps—1:24,000, NE-North Platte West, 1983, Record Group 57) table of contents Preface vii PART I INTRODUCTION ix Origins of Railroad Records ix Selection Criteria xii Using This Guide xiii Researching the Records xiii Guides to Records xiv Related
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations
    Pursuant to Section 207 of the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-432, Division B): Quarterly Report on the Performance and Service Quality of Intercity Passenger Train Operations Covering the Quarter Ended June, 2019 (Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2019) Federal Railroad Administration United States Department of Transportation Published August 2019 Table of Contents (Notes follow on the next page.) Financial Table 1 (A/B): Short-Term Avoidable Operating Costs (Note 1) Table 2 (A/B): Fully Allocated Operating Cost covered by Passenger-Related Revenue Table 3 (A/B): Long-Term Avoidable Operating Loss (Note 1) Table 4 (A/B): Adjusted Loss per Passenger- Mile Table 5: Passenger-Miles per Train-Mile On-Time Performance (Table 6) Test No. 1 Change in Effective Speed Test No. 2 Endpoint OTP Test No. 3 All-Stations OTP Train Delays Train Delays - Off NEC Table 7: Off-NEC Host Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Table 8: Off-NEC Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Train Delays - On NEC Table 9: On-NEC Total Host and Amtrak Responsible Delays per 10,000 Train-Miles Other Service Quality Table 10: Customer Satisfaction Indicator (eCSI) Scores Table 11: Service Interruptions per 10,000 Train-Miles due to Equipment-related Problems Table 12: Complaints Received Table 13: Food-related Complaints Table 14: Personnel-related Complaints Table 15: Equipment-related Complaints Table 16: Station-related Complaints Public Benefits (Table 17) Connectivity Measure Availability of Other Modes Reference Materials Table 18: Route Descriptions Terminology & Definitions Table 19: Delay Code Definitions Table 20: Host Railroad Code Definitions Appendixes A.
    [Show full text]
  • 20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting
    NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 12, 2021 Mr. Michael Lestingi Director, Office of Policy and Planning Federal Railroad Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Lestingi: In accordance with the Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service final rule published on November 16, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), this letter serves as Amtrak’s report to the Federal Railroad Administration that, as of April 10, 2021, Amtrak has provided the 29 host railroads over which Amtrak currently operates (listed in Appendix A) with ridership data for the prior month consistent with the Final Rule. The following data was provided to each host railroad: . the total number of passengers, by train and by day; . the station-specific number of detraining passengers, reported by host railroad whose railroad right-of-way serves the station, by train, and by day; and . the station-specific number of on-time passengers reported by host railroad whose railroad right- of-way serves the station, by train, and by day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Blair Sr. Director, Host Railroads Amtrak cc: Dennis Newman Amtrak Jason Maga Amtrak Christopher Zappi Amtrak Yoel Weiss Amtrak Kristin Ferriter Federal Railroad Administration Mr. Michael Lestingi April 12, 2021 Page 2 Appendix A Host Railroads Provided with Amtrak Ridership Data Host Railroad1 Belt Railway Company of Chicago BNSF Railway Buckingham Branch Railroad
    [Show full text]
  • The Strategies of Modern Science Development X International
    The Strategies of Modern Science Development X International scientific–practical conference 12-13 April 2016 Proceedings CreateSpace North Charleston, SC, USA 2016 Scientific Publishing Center "Discovery" otkritieinfo.ru The Strategies of Modern Science Development: Proceedings of the X International scientific–practical conference. North Charleston, USA, 12-13 April 2016. - North Charleston: CreateSpace, 2016. - 151 p. The materials of the conference have presented the results of the latest research in various fields of science. The collection is of interest to researchers, graduate students, doctoral candidates, teachers, students - for anyone interested in the latest trends of the world of science. ISBN-13: 978-1533065865 ISBN-10: 1533065861 Your book has been assigned a CreateSpace ISBN. @ Authors, 2016 @Scientific Publishing Center "Discovery", 2016 2 CONTENT SECTION I. Physical sciences Bednarzhevskiy S.S., Smirnov G.I., Strekalov M.L., Josan D.A., Filatov K.V. NONLINEAR-WAVE EFFECTS OF THE ENERGY EXTRACTION OF THE QUANTUM VACUUM ................................................................... 7 SECTION II. Information Technology Siddikjon Abduganiev, Manfred Pils, Friedrich Roithmayr Elicitation of Criteria Weights for the Web Quality Evaluation Method Universal Star: by using different ranking methods .................................... 11 Klevanskiy N.N., Antipov M.A. Simultaneous Freight Train Routing and Timetabling ............................... 24 SECTION III. Biological sciences Larkina N. I. AMPHIDIPLOIDS - INTERSPECIFIS
    [Show full text]
  • Modot STIP 2010
    2009-2013 Highway and Bridge Construction Schedule Construction contigency applied to construction cost in the year the project is awarded. STATE FISCAL YEAR PROJECT BUDGETING Three percent inflation compounded annually is applied to right-of-way and construction costs in program years 2, 3, 4, and 5. No inflation is applied to the Funding From Other Sources (FFOS) or Payments. 7/2008- 7/2009- 7/2010- 7/2011- 7/2012- Engineering includes PE costs, CE costs and R/W incidentals. 6/2009 6/2010 6/2011 6/2012 6/2013 County: Barry Rehabilitate bridge over Table Rock Lake 0.4 mile south of Rte. YY. Project involves Engineering: 1 1 1 161 0 bridge A0260. Route: MO 39 R/W: 0 0 0 0 0 Job No.: 7S0808 Construction: 0 0 0 2,553 0 Length: 0.20 MPO: N Fund Cat: Statewide Interstate And Major Bridge Fed: 2,042 State: 511 Local: 0 FFOS: 0 0 0 0 0 Sec Cat: Rehab And Reconst Award Date: 2012 Federal Cat: Bridge Payments: 0 0 0 0 0 County: Barry Reimbursement of $1.121 million in FY10 to the City of Monett for previously awarded Engineering: 0 0 0 0 0 project 7P0588. Route: US 60 R/W: 0 0 0 0 0 Job No.: 7P0588B Construction: 0 0 0 0 0 Length: 0.55 MPO: N Fund Cat: Major Projects & Emerging Needs Fed: 897 State: 224 Local: 0 FFOS: 0 0 0 0 0 Sec Cat: Regional Award Date: N/A Federal Cat: N.H.S. Payments: 0 1,121 0 0 0 County: Barry Reimbursement of $4.65 million in SFY 2011 to the City of Monett for previously awarded Engineering: 0 0 0 0 0 cost-share project.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Freight Plan
    Chapter 3 – Missouri Freight System Chapter 3 – Missouri Freight System KEY POINTS One of the key products of this Missouri State Freight Plan is a defined Missouri freight network. This is the first time Missouri has had a defined freight network. That is important for several reasons, chief among those: a proposed improvement project must be located on or adjacent to the defined freight network to be considered in the freight prioritization process. The top 100 freight generators in Missouri were identified based on truck activity. This information helped support the identification of the freight network and shaped the prioritization process. Freight and commodity flows underscore the role Missouri plays as a bridge state for the nation, as most freight travels through our state instead of starting or ending here. Introduction Missouri is at the freight crossroads of America. As the geographic and demographic center of population for the United States, Missouri is well positioned as the country’s freight nexus. Missouri’s freight system is a network of highway, rail, air, water, pipeline, intermodal facilities, and freight generators that together move goods and commodities. The freight system is how Missouri products like soybeans and aviation parts are transported around the world. An understanding of the key features of the Missouri Freight Network is integral to understanding the strategies and future goals outlined in this Missouri State Freight Plan. The freight system offers a range of service options. The best freight service for a particular shipment depends on the shipment weight, shipment value, the origin and destination, when the product is needed, security and safety, transportation costs, and customer needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Plan 2005 - 2006
    Kansas Department of Transportation Rail Plan 2005 - 2006 Kathleen Sebelius, Governor Debra L. Miller, Secretary of Transportation Kansas Department of Transportation Division of Planning and Development Bureau of Transportation Planning – Office of Rail Affairs Kansas Rail Plan Update 2005 - 2006 Kansas Department of Transportation Division of Planning and Development Bureau of Transportation Planning Office of Rail Affairs Dwight D. Eisenhower State Office Building 700 SW Harrison Street, Second Floor Tower Topeka, Kansas 66603-3754 Telephone: (785) 296-3841 Fax: (785) 296-0963 Debra L. Miller, Secretary of Transportation Terry Heidner, Division of Planning and Development Director Chris Herrick, Chief of Transportation Planning Bureau John Jay Rosacker, Assistant Chief Transportation Planning Bureau ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Prepared by CONTRIBUTORS Office of Rail Affairs Staff John W. Maddox, CPM, Rail Affairs Program Manager Darlene K. Osterhaus, Rail Affairs Research Analyst Edward Dawson, Rail Affairs Research Analyst Paul Ahlenius, P.E., Rail Affairs Engineer Bureau of Transportation Planning Staff John Jay Rosacker, Assistant Chief Transportation Planning Bureau Carl Gile, Decision Mapping Technician Specialist OFFICE OF RAIL AFFAIRS WEB SITE http://www.ksdot.org/burRail/Rail/default.asp Pictures provided by railroads or taken by Office of Rail Affairs staff Railroad data and statistics provided by railroads 1 Executive Summary The Kansas Rail Plan Update 2005 - 2006 has Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1654 et seg). Financial been prepared in accordance with requirements of the assistance in the form of Federal Rail Administration Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) U.S. Department (FRA) grants has been used to fund rehabilitation of Transportation (USDOT), as set forth in federal projects throughout Kansas.
    [Show full text]
  • MISSOURI’S You Can Get Involved INFRASTRUCTURE
    REPORT CARD FOR HowMISSOURI’S You Can Get Involved INFRASTRUCTURE 2018 G.P.A. “Don’t wait. The time will never be just right.” –Mark Twain Missouri Infrastructure 2013 Report Card 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 4 Aviation ............................................................................................................................... 6 Bridges ...............................................................................................................................12 Dams ..................................................................................................................................16 Drinking Water ................................................................................................................ 21 Energy ...............................................................................................................................24 Inland Waterways ............................................................................................................. 28 Levees ...............................................................................................................................34 Ports ................................................................................................................................... 38 Rail ....................................................................................................................................42 Roads
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak CEO Flynn House Railroads Testimony May 6 20201
    Testimony of William J. Flynn Chief Executive Officer National Railroad Passenger Corporation Before the United States House of Representatives House CommiFee on Transportation & Infrastructure SubcommiFee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials When Unlimited Potential Meets Limited Resources: The Benefits and Challenges of High-Speed Rail and Emerging Rail Technologies Thursday, May Q, RSRT TT:SS a.m. Rayburn House Office Building, Room RTQU Amtrak T MassachuseFs Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC RSSST-TYST (RSR) \SQ-]\T^ WHEN UNLIMITED POTENTIAL MEETS LIMITED RESOURCES: THE BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES OF HIGH-SPEED RAIL AND EMERGING RAIL TECHNOLOGIES Introduction Good morning, Chairman Payne, Ranking Member Crawford, and Members of this SubcommiFee. Thank you for inviting me to testify at this hearing on behalf of Amtrak. My name is William Flynn, and I am Amtrak’s Chief Executive Officer. I am particularly honored to be representing Amtrak at this hearing. It takes place six days after Pres- ident Biden traveled to Philadelphia to join us in celebrating Amtrak’s fiftieth anniversary. The American Jobs Plan he has proposed, which would provide $^S billion for Amtrak and high- speed and intercity passenger rail, is an important first step in developing an improved passenger rail system that would enhance mobility by serving more communities; provide more frequent and more equitable service; generate significant economic benefits; and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Amtrak has accomplished a great deal since we began service on May T, T\UT with a mandate to transform unprofitable intercity passenger rail services operated by private railroads into “a modern, efficient intercity railroad passenger service”1 – with an initial appropriation of only $YS million.
    [Show full text]
  • BNSF Railway Company Leased Lines and Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries
    BNSF Railway Company Leased Lines and Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries Class I Railroad Annual Report To the Surface Transportation Board For the Year Ending December 31, 2017 ACAA-R1 BNSF Railway Company 2650 Lou Menk Drive Fort Worth, Texas 76131 ANNUAL REPORT OF BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY TO THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 Name, official title, telephone number, and office address of officer in charge of correspondence with the Board regarding this report. (Name) Jon I. Stevens (Title) Vice President & Controller (Telephone number) (817) 352-4975 (Area (Area Code) code) (Telephone (Telephone Number) number) (Office address) 2650 Lou Menk Drive, Fort Worth, Texas 76131 (Street and number, City, State, and ZIP code) NOTICE 1. This report is required for every class I railroad operating within the United States. Three copies of this Annual Report should be completed. Two of the copies must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration, 395 E Street, S.W. Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20423, by March 31 of the year following that for which the report is made. One copy should be retained by the carrier. 2. Every inquiry must be definitely answered. Where the word "none" truly and completely states the fact, it should be given as the answer. If any inquiry is inapplicable, the words "not applicable" should be used. 3. Wherever the space provided in the schedules in insufficient to permit a full and complete statement of the requested information, inserts should be prepared and appropriately identified by the number of the schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • Host Railroad Report Card &
    Host Railroad Report Card & FAQ 1) What is a “host railroad”? Most of Amtrak’s network is on tracks owned, maintained, and dispatched by highly-profitable freight railroads, known as “host” railroads where Amtrak uses their tracks. Most of the trains on these rail lines are the freight railroads’ own freight trains. Because the freight railroads make all dispatching decisions about which trains have priority in using the rail line, the freight railroads have a tremendous amount of influence over Amtrak’s operations on their lines. Prior to Amtrak’s creation in 1971, the privately-owned railroads had a common carrier obligation to operate passenger trains themselves – an obligation that dated back to when the railroads were built in the 1800s. Because the railroads were losing money on their passenger trains, Congress created Amtrak and relieved the private railroads of their obligation to operate passenger trains. A very important part of the deal was that Amtrak would still have access to the railroads’ lines in order to operate passenger trains. Every year Amtrak pays host railroads $142 million for using their tracks and other resources needed to operate Amtrak trains. 2) What distinguishes hosts with good Amtrak performance? Hosts typically achieve good Amtrak performance through a combination of: a) Commitment to providing quality service for Amtrak’s passengers, b) An active partnership with Amtrak, where both sides work cooperatively and the hosts respect Federal law which protects the rights of our nation’s passengers, and c) A well-disciplined operation that benefits both Amtrak and freight customers alike. 3) What does “Delays per 10,000 train miles” mean? It is a measure of how much delay each host railroad causes to Amtrak trains.
    [Show full text]
  • Railroads and Harbors
    ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") Cornucopia Superior Red Lake Detail MINNESOTA "x Cliff "x Port Wing Superior Bayfield "x Wisconsin "x !5 White Pine Mine !5 Superior "x !5 "x La Pointe !5 !5!5 Washburn !5 !5 !5 "x !5 Saxon Harbor "x!5 Ashland !5 Bergland "x Railroads !5 Hawthorne !5 North Ironwood Marengo !5 Junction !5 Sauntry BAYFIELD DOUGLAS !5 Mellen & Harbors !5 Gordon IRON MICHIGAN Channing !5 !5 Glidden ASHLAND 2021 VILAS Hayward !5 Butternut Springbrook !5 ") !5 !5 Park Falls !5 Tipler Trego !5 BURNETT SAWYER !5 Fifield FOREST !5 FLORENCE Quinnesec Escanaba ") Spooner !5 !5 Hermansville !5 PRICE Kingsford !5 Laona Jct. Niagara !5 WASHBURN Weirgor !5 !5 Phillips Dunbar !5 !5 ONEIDA Argonne Cavour Powers !5 !5 !5 !5 Exeland !5 !5 !5 Pembine Rhinelander Goodman Tripoli !5 !5 BARRON RUSK Catawba !5 Crandon !5 Laona Beecher Hawkins !5 !5 Lake Rice Lake !5 !5 !5 Tony !5 Bradley Heafford Jct !5 Amberg Bruce !5 Prentice POLK Almena !5 !5 !5 Tomahawk MARINETTE Barron !5 Detroit !5 !5 !5 Ladysmith !5 Wisconsin Harbor !5 Dresser !5 !5 Osceola Poskin Cameron Conrath Dam Wausaukee "x !5 !5 MICHIGAN Sheldon !5 "x Chetek Sister Bay Northport LINCOLN LANGLADE Crivitz !5 "x Withrow !5 New Auburn TAYLOR Somerset New Richmond !5 !5 !5 CHIPPEWA !5 Gilman Merrill !5 !5 Medford !5 Menominee !5 Bloomer !5 Pound !5 "x Boyceville !5 OCONTO !5 ST CROIX !5 !5 Wheeler Stetsonville Coleman !5 Marinette Colfax !5 Brokaw Peshtigo ") !5 !5 !5 Chippewa !5 Falls Norma Cadott MARATHON MENOMINEE Hudson !5 !5 !5 Owen !5 Lena !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 !5 Abbotsford Sturgeon Minneapolis HammondBaldwin !5 !5 Wausau !5 Kelly Gillett Oconto Bay WoodvilleWilson Knapp Stanley Withee !5 !5 !5 "x St.
    [Show full text]