DOCSLIB.ORG

AAPOR 74Th Annual Conference WAPOR 72Nd Annual Conference Conference Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AAPOR 74Th Annual Conference WAPOR 72Nd Annual Conference Conference Program Conference Program AAPOR 74th WAPOR 72nd Annual Conference Annual Conference May 16-19, 2019 May 19-21, 2019 Sheraton Centre Toronto Hotel Chelsea Hotel Toronto Toronto, Ontario, Canada Toronto, Ontario, Canada www.aapor.org/conference #AAPOR Improving Lives Through Research® Data to Discovery. Discovery to Solutions. Come meet our survey research experts in the exhibit hall Proud to be an AAPOR Sustaining Sponsor Westat offers innovative professional services www.westat.com to help clients improve outcomes in health, education, social policy, and transportation. We are dedicated to improving lives An Employee-Owned Research Corporation® through research. Improving Lives Through Research® 74th Annual Conference 3 Table of Contents Conference App 4 Saturday, May 18 2019 Webinar Series 4 Saturday -at-a-Glance 84 – 86 General Conference Information 5 Saturday Schedule of Events 87 – 116 Highlights 6 – 7 AAPOR’s Commitment to Diversity 8 Sunday, May 19 AAPOR’s Conduct Statement 8 Sunday -at-a-Glance 117 – 118 Things to Do, Places to Go: Social Activities 10 Sunday Schedule of Events 119 – 131 AAPOR Executive Council 11 – 13 Data to Discovery. Chapter Presidents 14 AAPOR Advertisements 132 – 147 Discovery to Solutions. Past Presidents 15 Index 148 – 157 Executive Office Staff 15 Sponsor and Exhibitor Directory 158 – 165 Honorary Life Members 16 Meeting Room Floor Plans 166 Committees/Task Forces 17 – 24 Notes Page 194 Award Winners 25 – 28 Come meet our survey Committee Meetings 29 WAPOR Council 167 Social Activities Schedule 30 WAPOR Day-at-a-Glance 167 – 169 research experts in AAPOR Schedule of Events 31 – 32 WAPOR Schedule of Events 170 – 188 AAPOR Conference Sponsors 33 - 34 WAPOR Conference Sponsors 190 the exhibit hall AAPOR Exhibitor Listing 35 WAPOR Advertisements 189 – 193 AAPOR Advertiser Index 35 AAPOR Exhibit Hall Floor Plan 36 AAPOR Donors 37 Upcoming Events 39 Proud to be an AAPOR Sustaining Sponsor Wednesday, May 15 Wednesday-at-a-Glance 38 Wednesday Schedule of Events 38 – 39 Save the Date – AAPOR Future Conferences 39 Thursday, May 16 Westat offers innovative professional services www.westat.com Thursday -at-a-Glance 40 Thursday Schedule of Events 41 – 53 to help clients improve outcomes in health, education, social policy, and transportation. Friday, May 17 We are dedicated to improving lives An Employee-Owned Research Corporation® Friday -at-a-Glance 54 – 56 through research. Friday Schedule of Events 57 – 83 www.aapor.org/conference #AAPOR Conference Program 4 74th Annual Conference About AAPOR Founded in 1947, the American 2019 Webinar Series Association for Public Opinion Research is Sponsored by the leading association of public opinion and survey research professionals. June 20, 2019, 12 - 1:30 p.m. CST Text Messaging How-To The AAPOR community includes Jenny Marlar, Gallup producers and users of survey data from a July 11, 2019, 12 - 1:30 p.m. CST variety of disciplines. Our members span GIS for Surveys a range of interests including election Ned English, NORC at the University of Chicago polling, market research, statistics, research methodology, health related data August 22, 2019, 12 - 1:30 p.m. CST Transparency and Reproducibility in Social Science Research collection and education. Jeremy Freese, Stanford University Membership in AAPOR is all about September 10, 2019, 12 - 1:30 p.m. CST opportunity – the opportunity to learn AAPOR Task Force on Mixed Mode Report from a diverse group of leaders in the Committee survey and public opinion research field, October 10, 2019, 12 - 1:30 p.m. CST the opportunity to network and exchange Professional Development: knowledge and the opportunity to improve Career Transitions in the World of Survey Research how survey research is conducted and Claudia Deane, Pew Research Center Mandy Sha, Independent Consultant disseminated. Matt Jans, ICF International November 14, 2019, 12 - 1:30 p.m. CST Data Collection with Apps, Sensors, and Wearables Florian Keusch, University of Mannheim Conference App Frauke Kreuter, University of Maryland, University of Mannheim, Institute for Employment Research Please check out the new AAPOR Conference App. With this app you will December 12, 2019, 12 - 1:30 p.m. CST get up-to-date session changes in your Natural Language Processing for Social Scientists Patrick van Kessel, Pew Research Center calendar, so you won’t have to worry about missing a session. Link up with your friends ahead of time to share information and schedules, message each other and even set up meetings. Download the native app for your Android or Apple device or bookmark the Web app on your computer or Windows or Blackberry device. Go to www.aapor.org/conference for more information. Conference Program www.aapor.org/conference #AAPOR 72nd Annual Conference 5 General Conference Information AAPOR Information AAPOR Exhibit Hall Hours AAPOR General Registration Hours: Thursday, May 16 3:30 p.m. – 4:30 p.m. Wednesday, May 15 1:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. Friday, May 17 7:00 a.m. – 8:00 a.m. Thursday, May 16 7:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. 9:30 a.m. – 10:00 a.m. 11:45 a.m. – 12:45 p.m. Friday, May 17 7:30 a.m. – 4:30 p.m. 3:15 p.m. – 4:15 p.m. Saturday, May 18 7:30 a.m. – 3:00 p.m. Saturday, May 18 7:00 a.m. – 8:00 a.m. Sunday, May 19 8:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. 9:30 a.m. – 10:00 a.m. 12:45 p.m. – 1:45 p.m. The AAPOR Registration Desk is located in the Grand Ballroom Foyer on the Lower Concourse Level of the hotel. AAPOR WiFi We are pleased to be able to provide WiFi in all of the meeting AAPOR Badges conference rooms this year! Participation in the annual conference is limited to registered attendees. The official conference badge is required for admission to all sessions, social activities and the exhibit hall. Amenities & Services for Families Stop by the registration desk for changes to your badge. Private Office, Concourse Level A room has been set aside for parents in need of a private space to care for their infants. Power and refrigerator will be AAPOR Speaker Materials provided. Presenters who plan to use PowerPoint® (or similar software) Wednesday, May 15 1:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. must bring their presentation on a flash drive to the AV technician in the speaker ready room at least 24 hours prior Thursday, May 16 7:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. to their session. The presentations will be loaded onto the Friday, May 17 7:00 a.m. – 6:00 p.m. computer in the designated meeting room. Please plan on arriving at the session room at least 15 minutes prior to the Saturday, May 18 7:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. start of the session. Sunday, May 19 7:00 a.m. – Noon Conference Materials The final program and abstracts are available on the conference website www.aapor.org/conference. AAPOR Messages A message board will be maintained in the registration area during registration hours. www.aapor.org/conference #AAPOR Conference Program 6 74th Annual Conference Highlights Education – AAPOR Short Courses New Member & All Chapter Welcome Reception Eight in-depth short courses are offered to enhance your Thursday, May 16, 6:30 p.m. – 9:00 p.m. learning experience. These in-depth, half-day courses are Grand Ballroom Foyer taught by well-known experts in the survey research field and Touching base with colleagues and old friends is what this cover topics that affect our ever-changing industry. party is all about! Sponsor, exhibitor, first-time attendee or Course 1: Fundamentals! Learning the Basics of Qualitative old hand, this is your opportunity to start the conference on Data Analysis the right foot. Balance the intensity of AAPOR educational Course 2: Advances in Address Based Sampling sessions with the satisfaction of meeting colleagues who share your interests. Take a moment to visit your chapter colleagues Course 3: Augmenting Surveys with Data from and share insights from what you’ve learned. Smartphone Sensors and Apps: Best Practices Course 4: The World-Wide Challenge of Developing Effective Web-Push Survey Methods Presidential Address and Luncheon Course 5: Adaptive Survey Design Friday, May 17, 12:45 p.m. – 1:45 p.m. Grand Ballroom Course 6: Interactive Survey Data: Creating Captivating Data Visualizations in R Shiny Join fellow attendees for lunch on Friday and an insightful Sponsored by: Presidential Address from AAPOR President David Dutwin. Course 7: Cognition, Communication, and Self-Report Across Cultures Student & Early Career Professionals Meet-up Course 8: Let’s Learn about (Machine) Learning! Friday, May 17, 5:45 p.m. An Introduction to Machine Learning for Meet in Hotel Lobby Survey Researchers Join members of the AAPOR Membership & Chapter Relations There is still time to register for a short course. Committee for a dinner meet-up Friday night at 6:00 p.m. Meet Sign up at the registration desk. and mingle with other students and early career professionals For course descriptions see pages 38 - 39, 41 - 42 and 119. and take an opportunity to explore the city a bit. After dinner, we’ll have a bar crawl to continue the fun! Stay tuned for more details, and we hope you can make it for at least some of the Kickoff General Session: evening’s events! Conducting a Census in the Digital Age Meet in the hotel lobby at 5:45 p.m. and we’ll head offsite for Thursday, May 16, 2:00 p.m. – 3:30 p.m. an informal dinner. Grand Ballroom Session: Opening General Session Session Type: General Session Sunshine Hillygus, Duke University; James Treat, U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hybrid Online Audience Measurement Calculations Are Only As Good As the Input Data Quality
    People First: A User-Centric Hybrid Online Audience by John Brauer, Manager, Product Leadership, Measurement Model Nielsen Overview As with any media measurement methodology, hybrid online audience measurement calculations are only as good as the input data quality. Hybrid online audience measurement goes beyond a single metric to forecast online audiences more accurately by drawing on multiple data sources. The open question for online publishers and advertisers is, ‘Which hybrid audience measurement model provides the most accurate measure?’ • User-centric online hybrid models rely exclusively on high quality panel data for audience measurement calculations, then project activity to all sites informed by consumer behavior patterns on tagged sites • Site-centric online hybrid models depend on cookies for audience calculations, subject to the inherent weaknesses of cookie data that cannot tie directly to unique individuals and their valuable demographic information • Both hybrid models assume that panel members are representative of the universe being measured and comprise a base large enough to provide statistical reliability, measured in a way that accurately captures behavior • The site-centric hybrid model suffers from the issue of inaccurately capturing unique users as a result of cookie deletion and related activities that can result in audience measurement estimates different than the actual number • Rapid uptake of new online access devices further exacerbates site-centric cookie data tracking issues (in some cases overstating unique browsers by a factor of five) by increasing the likelihood of one individual representing multiple cookies Only the user-centric hybrid model enables a fair comparison of audiences across all web sites, avoids the pitfall of counting multiple cookies versus unique users, and employs a framework that anticipates future changes such as additional data sets and access devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B: Religious Demography of Sub-Saharan Africa
    Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life / Islam and Christianity in Sub-Saharan Africa Appendix B: Religious Demography of Sub-Saharan Africa This appendix provides statistical estimates for the distribution of Christians, Muslims and other religious groups in the 19 countries surveyed by the Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life. In addition to the Pew Forum’s 2009 data, results are shown from national censuses, demographic and health surveys, and other general population surveys. Sources National censuses are the best starting point for the distribution of religious adherents because they generally cover the entire population. Some censuses, such as South Africa’s, even provide layers of detail under the major religious traditions. Censuses, however, can be affected by methodological decisions, political bias and social concerns that affect how the data are managed and whether respondents feel free to be truthful. In the absence of reliable census data on religion, Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS)1 provide nationally representative data on religion that is highly regarded by experts. The DHS usually sample at least 7,000 households and are often repeated at multiple time points. The DHS generally survey people ages 15 to 49 and oversample (and sometimes only sample) women. This is a limitation, since religious adherence differs, albeit slightly, by sex and age. General population surveys such as those by the Pew Global Attitudes Project and Afrobarometer also provide valuable information on the percentage of the population belonging to major religious groups.2 Because general population surveys typically involve 1,000 to 2,000 respondents, however, they cannot provide accurate detail on the size of small religious groups.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Image Plummets Internationally As Most Say Country Has Handled Coronavirus Badly Ratings for Trump Remain Poor
    FOR RELEASE SEPTEMBER 15, 2020 U.S. Image Plummets Internationally as Most Say Country Has Handled Coronavirus Badly Ratings for Trump remain poor BY Richard Wike, Janell Fetterolf and Mara Mordecai FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES: Richard Wike, Director, Global Attitudes Research Stefan S. Cornibert, Communications Manager 202.419.4372 www.pewresearch.org RECOMMENDED CITATION Pew Research Center, September, 2020, “U.S. Image Plummets Internationally as Most Say Country Has Handled Coronavirus Badly” 1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. It does not take policy positions. The Center conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, content analysis and other data-driven social science research. It studies U.S. politics and policy; journalism and media; internet, science and technology; religion and public life; Hispanic trends; global attitudes and trends; and U.S. social and demographic trends. All of the Center’s reports are available at www.pewresearch.org. Pew Research Center is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts, its primary funder. © Pew Research Center 2020 www.pewresearch.org 2 PEW RESEARCH CENTER How we did this This analysis focuses on public opinion of the United States in 13 countries in North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. Views of the U.S. and its president are examined in the context of long-term trend data. The report also examines how people in other countries perceive America’s handling of the coronavirus outbreak and how those perceptions compare to ratings for their own country, the World Health Organization, the European Union and China.
    [Show full text]
  • Questionnaire Design Guidelines for Establishment Surveys
    Journal of Official Statistics, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2010, pp. 43–85 Questionnaire Design Guidelines for Establishment Surveys Rebecca L. Morrison1, Don A. Dillman2, and Leah M. Christian3 Previous literature has shown the effects of question wording or visual design on the data provided by respondents. However, few articles have been published that link the effects of question wording and visual design to the development of questionnaire design guidelines. This article proposes specific guidelines for the design of establishment surveys within statistical agencies based on theories regarding communication and visual perception, experimental research on question wording and visual design, and findings from cognitive interviews with establishment survey respondents. The guidelines are applicable to both paper and electronic instruments, and cover such topics as the phrasing of questions, the use of space, the placement and wording of instructions, the design of answer spaces, and matrices. Key words: Visual design; question wording; cognitive interviews. 1. Introduction In recent years, considerable effort has been made to develop questionnaire construction guidelines for how questions should appear in establishment surveys. Examples include guidelines developed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (2006) and Statistics Norway (Nøtnæs 2006). These guidelines have utilized the rapidly emerging research on how the choice of survey mode, question wording, and visual layout influence respondent answers, in order to improve the quality of responses and to encourage similarity of construction when more than one survey data collection mode is used. Redesign efforts for surveys at the Central Bureau of Statistics in the Netherlands (Snijkers 2007), Statistics Denmark (Conrad 2007), and the Office for National Statistics in the United Kingdom (Jones et al.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Image Abroad Rebounds With
    FOR RELEASE JUNE 10, 2021 America’s Image Abroad Rebounds With Transition From Trump to Biden But many raise concerns about health of U.S. political system BY Richard Wike, Jacob Poushter, Laura Silver, Janell Fetterolf and Mara Mordecai FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES: Richard Wike, Director, Global Attitudes Research Stefan Cornibert, Communications Manager 202.419.4372 www.pewresearch.org RECOMMENDED CITATION Pew Research Center, June, 2021, “America’s Image Abroad Rebounds With Transition From Trump to Biden” 1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. It does not take policy positions. The Center conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, content analysis and other data-driven social science research. It studies U.S. politics and policy; journalism and media; internet, science and technology; religion and public life; Hispanic trends; global attitudes and trends; and U.S. social and demographic trends. All of the Center’s reports are available at www.pewresearch.org. Pew Research Center is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts, its primary funder. © Pew Research Center 2021 www.pewresearch.org 2 PEW RESEARCH CENTER How we did this This analysis focuses on public opinion of the United States in 16 advanced economies in North America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. Views of the U.S. and its president are examined in the context of long-term trend data. The report also explores how people view President Joe Biden’s proposed policies and characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Esomar/Grbn Guideline for Online Sample Quality
    ESOMAR/GRBN GUIDELINE FOR ONLINE SAMPLE QUALITY ESOMAR GRBN ONLINE SAMPLE QUALITY GUIDELINE ESOMAR, the World Association for Social, Opinion and Market Research, is the essential organisation for encouraging, advancing and elevating market research: www.esomar.org. GRBN, the Global Research Business Network, connects 38 research associations and over 3500 research businesses on five continents: www.grbn.org. © 2015 ESOMAR and GRBN. Issued February 2015. This Guideline is drafted in English and the English text is the definitive version. The text may be copied, distributed and transmitted under the condition that appropriate attribution is made and the following notice is included “© 2015 ESOMAR and GRBN”. 2 ESOMAR GRBN ONLINE SAMPLE QUALITY GUIDELINE CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE ................................................................................................... 4 2 DEFINITIONS .............................................................................................................................. 4 3 KEY REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................................ 6 3.1 The claimed identity of each research participant should be validated. .................................................. 6 3.2 Providers must ensure that no research participant completes the same survey more than once ......... 8 3.3 Research participant engagement should be measured and reported on ............................................... 9 3.4 The identity and personal
    [Show full text]
  • Danish Meteorological Institute Ministry for Climate and Energy
    Danish Meteorological Institute Ministry for Climate and Energy Danish Climate Centre Report 09-06 Vorticity Area Index: comparing ERA40 values with NCEP Peter Thejll www.dmi.dk/dmi/dkc09-06Copenhagen 2009 page 1 of 17 Danish Meteorological Institute Danish Climate Centre Report 09-06 Colophone Serial title: Danish Climate Centre Report 09-06 Title: Vorticity Area Index: comparing ERA40 values with NCEP Subtitle: Authors: Peter Thejll Other Contributers: Responsible Institution: Danish Meteorological Institute Language: English Keywords: solar-terrestrial physics, vorticity Url: www.dmi.dk/dmi/dkc09-06 ISSN: 1399-1388 ISBN: 978-87-7478-582-8 Version: 1 Website: www.dmi.dk Copyright: Danish Meteorological Institute www.dmi.dk/dmi/dkc09-06 page 2 of 17 Danish Meteorological Institute Danish Climate Centre Report 09-06 Contents Colophone . ........................................ 2 1 Dansk resumé 4 2 Abstract 5 3 Introduction 6 4 Relative vorticity 6 5VAI 7 6 Discussion 7 7 References 15 7.1 Previous reports . ................................. 17 www.dmi.dk/dmi/dkc09-06 page 3 of 17 Danish Meteorological Institute Danish Climate Centre Report 09-06 1. Dansk resumé Værdier for vorticity area index (VAI) udregnet på grundlag af re-analysedata fra NCEP/NCAR, i USA, sammenlignes med VAI data udregnet på grundlag af den europæiske re-analyse ERA40. VAI anvendes i analysen af solens mulige indvirkning på dannelsen af lavtryk. De udledte værdier for VAI kan bruges i evalueringen af eksterne forcerinsgmekanismer såsom Brian Tinsley’s hypotese om det elektriske kredsløbs rolle i de mikrofysiske processer omkring skydannelse [Tinsley, 1996], [Zhou and Tinsley, 2007], [Burns et al., 2008], [Kniveton et al., 2008].
    [Show full text]
  • EFAMRO / ESOMAR Position Statement on the Proposal for an Eprivacy Regulation —
    EFAMRO / ESOMAR Position Statement on the Proposal for an ePrivacy Regulation — April 2017 EFAMRO/ESOMAR Position Statement on the Proposal for an ePrivacy Regulation April 2017 00. Table of contents P3 1. About EFAMRO and ESOMAR 2. Key recommendations P3 P4 3. Overview P5 4. Audience measurement research P7 5. Telephone and online research P10 6. GDPR framework for research purposes 7. List of proposed amendments P11 a. Recitals P11 b. Articles P13 2 EFAMRO/ESOMAR Position Statement on the Proposal for an ePrivacy Regulation April 2017 01. About EFAMRO and ESOMAR This position statement is submitted In particular our sector produces research on behalf of EFAMRO, the European outcomes that guide decisions of public authorities (e.g. the Eurobarometer), the non- Research Federation, and ESOMAR, profit sector including charities (e.g. political the World Association for Data, opinion polling), and business (e.g. satisfaction Research and Insights. In Europe, we surveys, product improvement research). represent the market, opinion and In a society increasingly driven by data, our profession ensures the application of appropriate social research and data analytics methodologies, rigour and provenance controls sectors, accounting for an annual thus safeguarding access to quality, relevant, turnover of €15.51 billion1. reliable, and aggregated data sets. These data sets lead to better decision making, inform targeted and cost-effective public policy, and 1 support economic development - leading to ESOMAR Global Market Research 2016 growth and jobs. 02. Key Recommendations We support the proposal for an ePrivacy Amendment of Article 8 and Recital 21 to enable Regulation to replace the ePrivacy Directive as research organisations that comply with Article this will help to create a level playing field in a true 89 of the General Data Protection Regulation European Digital Single Market whilst increasing (GDPR) to continue conducting independent the legal certainty for organisations operating in audience measurement research activities for different EU member states.
    [Show full text]
  • Esomar Guideline on Social Media Research
    ESOMAR GUIDELINE ON SOCIAL MEDIA RESEARCH World Research Codes and Guidelines 1 | World Research Codes and Guidelines All ESOMAR world research codes and guidelines, including latest updates, are available online at www.esomar.org © 2011 ESOMAR. All rights reserved. Issued July 2011 No part of this publication may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means, or translated, without the prior permission in writing of ESOMAR. ESOMAR codes and guidelines are drafted in English and the English texts are the definitive versions. 2 | World Research Codes and Guidelines ESOMAR GUIDELINE ON SOCIAL MEDIA RESEARCH CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Scope 3 1.2 Definitions 3 2. KEY PRINCIPLES 4 2.1 Distinguishing market, social and opinion research as a purpose 4 2.2 Conforming to law 5 2.3 Consent and notification 6 2.4 Protecting identifiable data 6 2.5 Ensuring no harm 7 2.6 Children 7 2.7 Reputation of the industry 8 2.8 Reporting 8 3. SOME SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS 8 FOR CERTAIN SOCIAL MEDIA 3.1 Defining social media areas 8 3.2 Private social media areas issues 8 3.3 Market research social media areas issues 9 4. FURTHER INFORMATION 9 Appendix 1: Key fundamentals of the ICC/ESOMAR Code 10 Appendix 2: Contract/Policy advice with sub-contractors/third party suppliers of SMR 10 3 | World Research Codes and Guidelines 1. INTRODUCTION The evolution of social media in recent years has changed the way that hundreds of millions of people share information about themselves around the world. The concept of consumers generating their own content on the internet has become ubiquitous.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Tables
    1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER Additional tables Near-universal awareness of the census Have you ever heard of the United States census, or have you not heard of this? (%) Yes, have Yes, after No, have heard description* not heard All U.S. adults 95 3 2 Men 96 2 2 Women 93 4 3 Ages 18-29 86 7 6 30-49 94 3 2 50-64 98 <0.5 1 65+ 100 <0.5 <0.5 White 98 1 1 Black 91 3 7 Hispanic 89 7 5 High school or less 92 4 4 Some college 96 2 2 Bachelor’s degree+ 97 2 1 Family income <$30,000 90 5 5 $30,000-$74,999 95 3 2 $75,000+ 98 1 <0.5 Republican/Lean Rep 96 2 1 Democrat/Lean Dem 94 3 3 *Respondents who said they had not heard of the United States census or did not answer the question were asked, “The census is the count of all people who live in the United States. Have you ever heard of that before, or have you not heard of that?” Note: Share of respondents who didn’t offer an answer to the follow- up question not shown. Figures may not add to 100% due to rounding. Whites and blacks include those who report being only one race and are non-Hispanic. Hispanics are of any race. Data for Asians and other racial and ethnic groups are included in the total but are not shown separately due to small sample size. “Some college” includes those with an associate degree and those who attended college but did not obtain a degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Solvay 224 Avenue Louise 1050 Brussels
    Mobilise! Incorporating Mobile Phones in Social and Policy-oriented Surveys ALEC M GALLUP FUTURE OF 1SURVEY RESEARCH FORUM 14 October, 2009 Hôtel Solvay 224 Avenue Louise 1050 Brussels % Dear Attendee, Mobile phones have had a remarkable impact on the world in a relatively short period of time. In all surveys, the overriding consideration is to reach all members of the public, young or old, male or female, employed or self- employed. In the nineties, fixed-line telephone coverage reached almost saturation point, but times are changing. In Europe, countries such as Finland and the Czech Republic now have a majority of citizens who are "mobile-only". Furthermore, as mobile phone ownership and usage is currently higher among certain groups, such as younger members of the population, the potential arises for mobile-phone non- coverage bias. This was a topic widely debated during the 2004 US Presidential election. Further discussion and research on the topic is vital. That's why Gallup has brought together the world's leading experts to thrash out issues that will undoubtedly impact the future of social research. Earlier this year, we were saddened by the death of Alec Gallup, a consummate polling professional who served the company for 60 years. If he was still with us, he would be watching the increase of the mobile-phone population with interest. Alec Gallup understood polling from A to Z and he knew that that the future of survey research depended on methodologies that would continue to give an equal opportunity of being polled … to all members of the public Bi-annual series of seminars: Future of Surveys We would therefore like to welcome you to "The 1st Alec Gallup Future of Survey Research Forum: Incorporating Mobile Phones in Social and Policy-oriented Surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • Rating the Audience: the Business of Media
    Balnaves, Mark, Tom O'Regan, and Ben Goldsmith. "Bibliography." Rating the Audience: The Business of Media. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2011. 256–267. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 2 Oct. 2021. <>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 2 October 2021, 14:23 UTC. Copyright © Mark Balnaves, Tom O'Regan and Ben Goldsmith 2011. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. Bibliography Adams, W.J. (1994), ‘Changes in ratings patterns for prime time before, during, and after the introduction of the people meter’, Journal of Media Economics , 7: 15–28. Advertising Research Foundation (2009), ‘On the road to a new effectiveness model: Measuring emotional responses to television advertising’, Advertising Research Foundation, http://www.thearf.org [accessed 5 July 2011]. Andrejevic, M. (2002), ‘The work of being watched: Interactive media and the exploitation of self-disclosure’, Critical Studies in Media Communication , 19(2): 230–48. Andrejevic, M. (2003), ‘Tracing space: Monitored mobility in the era of mass customization’, Space and Culture , 6(2): 132–50. Andrejevic, M. (2005), ‘The work of watching one another: Lateral surveillance, risk, and governance’, Surveillance and Society , 2(4): 479–97. Andrejevic, M. (2006), ‘The discipline of watching: Detection, risk, and lateral surveillance’, Critical Studies in Media Communication , 23(5): 392–407. Andrejevic, M. (2007), iSpy: Surveillance and Power in the Interactive Era , Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. Andrews, K. and Napoli, P.M. (2006), ‘Changing market information regimes: a case study of the transition to the BookScan audience measurement system in the US book publishing industry’, Journal of Media Economics , 19(1): 33–54.
    [Show full text]