South Taranaki District Council Nukumaru Station Road Extension

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

South Taranaki District Council Nukumaru Station Road Extension Appendix 5: Technical Report: Traffic Assessment Report, Traffic Design Group Appendix 5: Technical Report: Nukumaru Station Road Extension | Notice of Requirement and Assessment of Environmental Effects South Taranaki District Council Nukumaru Station Road Extension Traffic Assessment Report March 2017 TDG Ref: 14432 stdc nukumaru station rd extn tar.docx South Taranaki District Council Nukumaru Station Road Extension Traffic Assessment Report Quality Assurance Statement Prepared by: Cobus de Kock Associate Reviewed by: Mark Georgeson Director Approved for Issue by: Mark Georgeson Director Status: Final Date: 22 March 2017 PO Box 30-721, Lower Hutt 5040 New Zealand P: +64 4 569 8497 www.tdg.co.nz 22 March 2017 14432 STDC Nukumaru Station Rd Extn TAR South Taranaki District Council, Nukumaru Station Road Extension Traffic Assessment Report Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Existing Transport Network .......................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Locality ................................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Existing Traffic Patterns and Distribution ........................................................................... 3 2.3 Road Safety Record ............................................................................................................. 5 3. Nukumaru Station Road Extension ............................................................................................... 7 3.1 Proposed New Alignment ................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Expected Travel Patterns & Traffic Redistribution ............................................................. 8 3.3 Intersection with State Highway 3 ...................................................................................... 9 3.4 Intersection at Waiinu Beach Road .................................................................................. 10 3.5 Railway Level Crossing ...................................................................................................... 12 4. Travel Times and Distances ......................................................................................................... 15 4.1 Waiinu Beach Road ........................................................................................................... 15 4.2 Nukumaru Station Road ................................................................................................... 15 4.3 Travel Times ...................................................................................................................... 16 5. Railway Level Crossings ............................................................................................................... 17 6. Assessment of Traffic Outcomes ................................................................................................ 18 6.1 Network Resilience ........................................................................................................... 18 6.2 Road Safety ....................................................................................................................... 18 6.3 Travel Time and Distance ................................................................................................. 18 7. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 19 Appendix A 1 ALCAM Risk Reports for Existing Level Crossings 1 Appendix B 2 KiwiRail Risk Reports for Changed Level Crossings 2 Appendix C 3 LCSIA Report for Nukumaru Station Road 3 22 March 2017 14432 STDC Nukumaru Station Rd Extn TAR South Taranaki District Council, Nukumaru Station Road Extension Traffic Assessment Report Page 1 1. Introduction TDG has been appointed by South Taranaki District Council to provide traffic and transport consultancy services in relation to the proposed extension of Nukumaru Station Road in the South Taranaki District. The purpose of the proposed extension is to provide assured access to Waiinu Beach Road south of the Lime Works Bridge; this includes access to Silver Fern Farms, Richard Alexander Quarry, the surrounding farms and the Waiinu Beach settlement. This report summarises the assessment undertaken of the traffic and transport related features and effects that the extension of Nukumaru Station Road to Waiinu Beach Road will have on the road network, road safety, railway level crossings, travel times and distances, and network resilience. This report identifies that the local transport network will not be adversely affected by the addition of a new access road to the Waiinu Beach settlement and surrounding areas. It further concludes that the quantum of traffic, both existing and reassigned following construction of the new road, is so low that the roads, intersections and railway level crossings, if designed to specified standards as proposed, will perform efficiently and safely. The proposed new road will have an effect on travel times and distances in a positive manner for some traffic to and from the south and, importantly, will provide a new route that is not reliant on the Lime Works Bridge. 22 March 2017 14432 STDC Nukumaru Station Rd Extn TAR South Taranaki District Council, Nukumaru Station Road Extension Traffic Assessment Report Page 2 2. Existing Transport Network 2.1 Locality Waiinu Beach Road is classified in the Operative District Plan as an Arterial Road (coloured blue in Figure 1 below) that connects the Waitotara and Waiinu Beach communities. This road serves as the only access road to Silver Fern Farms, Richard Alexander Quarry, the surrounding farms and the Waiinu Beach settlement. Waiinu Beach Road connects to State Highway 3 by means of Ihupuku Street, at a Stop controlled intersection. By comparison, Nukumaru Station Road, to the south, is a local rural cul-de-sac serving few rural properties. Figure 1: Road Hierarchy Form Waitotara, Waiinu Beach Road runs on the western bank of the Waitotara River for approximately 3.5km, beyond which it then crosses the river at the Lime Works Bridge and continues south towards Waiinu Beach, as shown in Figure 2. Waiinu Beach Road has a level crossing over the railway line at Waitotara station and a posted open road speed limit south from Waitotara’s suburban edge. 22 March 2017 14432 STDC Nukumaru Station Rd Extn TAR South Taranaki District Council, Nukumaru Station Road Extension Traffic Assessment Report Page 3 Figure 2: Waiinu Beach Road Locality 2.2 Existing Traffic Patterns and Distribution 2.2.1 Traffic Volumes on SH3 Existing traffic volume data for State Highway 3 is provided by the NZTA Waitotara Telemetry counting station, which is located to the south of Waitotara. The annual average daily traffic (AADT) volume for 2015 was 3732 vehicles per day with a 17.3% heavy vehicle percentage, as shown in Figure 3. Figure 3: State Highway 3 AADT east of Waitotara (NZTA) The detailed average daily and average hourly traffic information, as provided by the NZTA Telemetry station, is shown in Figure 4. The average weekday hourly peak traffic is 310 22 March 2017 14432 STDC Nukumaru Station Rd Extn TAR South Taranaki District Council, Nukumaru Station Road Extension Traffic Assessment Report Page 4 vehicles per hour, for both directions combined, and occurs between 16:00 and 17:00. The average hourly heavy vehicle peak of 54 vehicles occurs between 11:00 and 12:00. Figure 4: Avery State Highway 3 Volumes East of Waitotara (NZTA) 2.2.2 Traffic Volumes on Waiinu Beach Road To inform this assessment, South Taranaki District Council made available MetroCount traffic data from counts carried out between 2001 to 2016 along Waiinu Beach Road (and Ihupuku Street), from State Highway 3 to Waiinu Beach. From this data, and at busier times of the year, it is assessed that the typical average daily vehicle traffic flows along Waiinu Beach Road are: at Waitotara, between SH3 & Kells Street Intersection: 700 vehicles per day; beyond Waitotara towards Waiinu Beach : 500 vehicles per day; to and from Silver Fern Farms: 330 vehicles per day; 22 March 2017 14432 STDC Nukumaru Station Rd Extn TAR South Taranaki District Council, Nukumaru Station Road Extension Traffic Assessment Report Page 5 to and from Richard Alexander Quarry: 20 vehicles per day; and to and from Waiinu Beach: 150 vehicles per day. The traffic composition that continues south from Waitotara is estimated to have a heavy vehicle percentage in the order of 20%. These volumes (for light and heavy vehicles combined) fluctuate through the year as the travel patterns are heavily influenced by seasonal trends, particularly in relation to Silver Fern Farms which has its peak production season between November and March, and also in relation to the Waiinui Beach settlement which is similarly more busy during the summer periods. 2.2.3 Traffic Distribution The observed vehicle split at the existing State Highway 3 intersection in Waitotara is 80% south towards Whanganui and 20% north towards Hawera. Silver Fern Farms accounts for the majority of traffic in the area, with their workforce having a corresponding 85/15 south/north split. In terms of the heavy vehicle component of the Farms activity, most incoming livestock is received from the north, with outgoing
Recommended publications
  • Zone Council Community Board 1 Far North District Council Te Hiku Bay
    Zone Council Community Board 1 Far North District Council Te Hiku Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Kaikohe-Hokianga 2 Opotiki District Council Coast Otorohanga District Council Kawhia Otorohanga Rotorua District Council Rotorua Lakes South Waikato District Council Tirau Taupo District Council Turangi-Tongariro Thames-Coromandel District Council Coromandel-Colville Mercury Bay Tairua-Pauanui Thames Whangamate Waikato District Council Huntly Community Board Ngaruawahia Community Board Onewhero-Tuakau Community Board Raglan Communtiy Board Taupiri Community Board Waipa District Council Cambridge Te Awamutu Western Bay of Plenty District Council Katikati Community Board Maketu Community Board Omokoroa Community Board Te Puke Community Board Waihi Beach Community Board Whakatane District Council Murupara Ohope Beach Rangitaiki Taneatua Whakatane 3 Hastings District Council Rural Community Board Horowhenua District Council Foxton New Plymouth District Council Clifton Inglewood Kaitake Waitara Rangitiki District Council Ratana Community Board Taihape Community Board Ruapehu District Council National Park Waimarino-Waiouru South Taranaki District Council Egmont Plains Eltham Hawera-Normanby Patea Tararua District Council Dannevirke Eketahuna Wanganui District Council Wanganui Rural 4 Hutt City Council Eastbourne Community Board Petone Community Board Wainuiomata Community Board Kapiti Coast District Council Otaki Paraparaumu/Raumati Waikanae Paekakariki South Wairarapa District Council Featherston Greytown Martinborough Wellington City Council Makara-Ohariu
    [Show full text]
  • The Decision in New Health New Zealand Inc V South Taranaki District Council
    161 A DECAY OF RIGHTS: THE DECISION IN NEW HEALTH NEW ZEALAND INC V SOUTH TARANAKI DISTRICT COUNCIL Rose Louise Goss* The decision in New Health New Zealand Inc v South Taranaki District Council is the most recent legal development in the New Zealand debate about fluoridation of public water supplies. That decision centred on the interpretation of s 11 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, the right to refuse medical treatment. The Court held that the fluoridation in question was legal, and reached a limited definition of medical treatment that did not encompass fluoridation. This article analyses the reasoning leading to that interpretation, concluding that the decision is problematic and that the definition of s 11 needs to be remedied. The use of the wording of s 11 to limit the definition of medical treatment was inappropriate, as was the policy reasoning used to support that limitation. The structure of the reasoning exacerbated these issues and adhered too closely to the reasoning in United States cases. Furthermore, the application of a de minimis threshold was conducted without adequate scrutiny, and such a threshold should not be applied to s 11. I INTRODUCTION In Texas and Colorado in the 1900s, a peculiar phenomenon of stained teeth became noticeable and was referred to as both "Texas Teeth" and "Colorado Brown Stain".1 Investigations soon revealed that the stained teeth, while unsightly, were also more resistant to dental caries.2 Further analysis revealed that the cause of both the resistance and the staining was fluoride. The benefits of fluoride were soon acknowledged by public health authorities and fluoride was added to public water supplies.3 Fluoride has since become a common additive to water supplies worldwide.4 * Article submitted as part of the LLB(Hons) programme at Victoria University of Wellington.
    [Show full text]
  • Rārangitake Take Kaunihera Council Agenda
    Ordinary Council Meeting - Cover Rārangitake take Kaunihera Council Agenda Monday 2 November 2020, 7pm Council Chambers, Albion Street, Hāwera 1 Ordinary Council Meeting - Governance Information Phil Nixon Robert Northco� Andy Beccard Mark Bellringer Gary Brown Mayor Deputy Mayor Councillor Councillor Councillor Celine Filbee Aarun Langton Steff y Mackay Jack Rangiwahia Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor Diana Reid Bryan Roach Brian Rook Chris Young Councillor Councillor Councillor Councillor 2 Ordinary Council Meeting - Agenda Ordinary Council Meeting Monday 2 November 2020 at 7.00 pm 1. Matakore / Apologies 2. Tīmatanga Kōrero / Opening Remark 2.1 Deputy Mayor Robert Northcott 3. Whakatakoto Kaupapa Whānui, Whakaaturanga hoki / Open Forum and Presentations 3.1 Venture Taranaki 4. Whakaaetia ngā Menīti / Confirmation of Minutes 4.1 Ordinary Council 21 September 2020 ........................................................................... Page 8 5. Ngā Menīti Komiti me ngā Poari / Committee and Board Minutes 5.1 Extraordinary Environment and Hearings Committee 23 September 2020 ......................... Page 20 5.2 Eltham-Kaponga Community Board 5 October 2020 ........................................................... Page 26 5.3 Te Hāwera Community Board 5 October 2020 ..................................................................... Page 32 5.4 Taranaki Coastal Community Board 6 October 2020 ........................................................... Page 39 5.5 Pātea Community Board 7 October 2020 ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Notes Subscription Agreement)
    Amendment and Restatement Deed (Notes Subscription Agreement) PARTIES New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency Limited Issuer The Local Authorities listed in Schedule 1 Subscribers 3815658 v5 DEED dated 2020 PARTIES New Zealand Local Government Funding Agency Limited ("Issuer") The Local Authorities listed in Schedule 1 ("Subscribers" and each a "Subscriber") INTRODUCTION The parties wish to amend and restate the Notes Subscription Agreement as set out in this deed. COVENANTS 1. INTERPRETATION 1.1 Definitions: In this deed: "Notes Subscription Agreement" means the notes subscription agreement dated 7 December 2011 (as amended and restated on 4 June 2015) between the Issuer and the Subscribers. "Effective Date" means the date notified by the Issuer as the Effective Date in accordance with clause 2.1. 1.2 Notes Subscription Agreement definitions: Words and expressions defined in the Notes Subscription Agreement (as amended by this deed) have, except to the extent the context requires otherwise, the same meaning in this deed. 1.3 Miscellaneous: (a) Headings are inserted for convenience only and do not affect interpretation of this deed. (b) References to a person include that person's successors, permitted assigns, executors and administrators (as applicable). (c) Unless the context otherwise requires, the singular includes the plural and vice versa and words denoting individuals include other persons and vice versa. (d) A reference to any legislation includes any statutory regulations, rules, orders or instruments made or issued pursuant to that legislation and any amendment to, re- enactment of, or replacement of, that legislation. (e) A reference to any document includes reference to that document as amended, modified, novated, supplemented, varied or replaced from time to time.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of the South Taranaki District
    The Impact of Big Box Retailing on the Future of Rural SME Retail Businesses: A Case Study of the South Taranaki District Donald McGregor Stockwell A thesis submitted to Auckland University of Technology in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy 2009 Institute of Public Policy Primary Supervisor Dr Love Chile TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ATTESTATION OF AUTHORSHIP ........................................................................ 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................................................................ 8 ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY ................................ 10 CHAPTER TWO: GEOGRAPHICAL AND HISTORICAL BACKGROUND TO THE TARANAKI REGION................................................................................................ 16 2.1 Location and Geographical Features of the Taranaki Region ............................. 16 2.2 A Brief Historical Background to the Taranaki Region ...................................... 22 CHAPTER THREE: MAJOR DRIVERS OF THE SOUTH TARANAKI ECONOMY ......................... 24 3.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 24 3.2 The Processing Sector Associated with the Dairy Industry ................................ 25 3.3 Oil and Gas Industry in the South Taranaki District ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • HRE05002-038.Pdf(PDF, 152
    Appendix S: Parties Notified List of tables Table S1: Government departments and Crown agencies notified ........................... 837 Table S2: Interested parties notified .......................................................................... 840 Table S3: Interested Māori parties ............................................................................ 847 Table S1: Government departments and Crown agencies notified Job Title Organisation City Manager Biosecurity Greater Wellington - The Regional Council Masterton 5915 Environment Health Officer Wairoa District Council Wairoa 4192 Ministry of Research, Science & Wellington 6015 Technology (MoRST) Manager, Animal Containment AgResearch Limited Hamilton 2001 Facility Group Manager, Legal AgResearch Limited Hamilton Policy Analyst Human Rights Commission Auckland 1036 Management, Monitoring & Ministry of Pacific Island Affairs Wellington 6015 Governance Fish & Game Council of New Zealand Wellington 6032 Engineer Land Transport Safety Authority Wellington 6015 Senior Fisheries Officer Fish & Game Eastern Region Rotorua 3220 Adviser Ministry of Research, Science & Wellington 6015 Technology (MoRST) Programme Manager Environment Waikato Hamilton 2032 Biosecurity Manager Environment Southland Invercargill 9520 Dean of Science and University of Waikato Hamilton 3240 Technology Director National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Wellington 6041 Research Limited (NIWA) Chief Executive Officer Horticulture and Food Research Institute Auckland 1020 (HortResearch Auckland) Team Leader Regulatory
    [Show full text]
  • South Taranaki District Council Opunake Wastewater Treatment System Monitoring Programme Annual Report 2012-2013 Technical Report 2013-18
    South Taranaki District Council Opunake Wastewater Treatment System Monitoring Programme Annual Report 2012-2013 Technical Report 2013-18 ISSN: 0114-8184 (Print) ISSN: 1178-1467 (Online) Taranaki Regional Council Document:1231555 (Word) Private Bag 713 Document:1240720 (Pdf) STRATFORD September 2013 Executive summary The South Taranaki District Council operates the Opunake Wastewater Treatment System located to the west of Opunake, in the Heimama catchment, and holds resource consents to allow it to discharge treated wastewater to land and natural water, and (coastal permit) to discharge comminuted wastewater via an ocean outfall into the Tasman Sea. The consent to discharge treated wastewater to land allows for a limited discharge to natural water in recognition of improved reticulation to capture highly treated overland flow and discharge this in a controlled manner. The coastal permit was renewed in August 2004 for a period of 14 years. A consent is also held to place and maintain the outfall within the coastal marine area at Middleton Bay. This report for the period July 2012-June 2013 describes the monitoring programme implemented by the Taranaki Regional Council to assess the environmental performance during the period under review, and the results and effects of the consent holder’s activities. South Taranaki District Council holds three resource consents, which include a total of 32 special conditions setting out the requirements that the South Taranaki District Council must satisfy in respect of the Opunake Wastewater Treatment Plant. The Council’s monitoring programme included four inspections, physicochemical and bacteriological sampling of wastewaters, bacteriological surveys of the coastal receiving waters, and recreational bacteriological surveys of the receiving waters of the Tasman Sea (at Opunake Beach and Middleton Bay).
    [Show full text]
  • CB List by Zone and Council
    ZONE COUNCIL COMMUNITY BOARD 1 Far North District Council Te Hiku Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Kaikohe-Hokianga 2 Matamata-Piako District Council Matamata Morrinsville Te Aroha Opotiki District Council Coast Otorohanga District Council Kawhia Otorohanga Rotorua District Council Rotorua Lakes South Waikato District Council Tirau (names only – no contact details) Taupo District Council Turangi- Tongariro Thames-Coromandel District Council Coromandel-Colville Mercury Bay Tairua-Pauanui Thames Whangamata Waikato District Council Huntly Community Board Ngaruawahia Community Board Onewhero -Tuakau Community Board Raglan Community Board Taupiri Community Board Waipa District Council Cambridge (names only – no contact details) Te Awamutu (names only – no contact details) Western Bay of Plenty District Council Katikati Community Board Maketu Community Board Omokoroa Community Board Te Puke Community Board Waihi Beach Community Board Whakatane District Council Murupara Ohope Beach Rangitaiki Taneatua Whakatane 3 Hastings District Council Rural Community Board Horowhenua District Council Foxton New Plymouth District Council Clifton Inglewood Kaitake Waitara Rangitikei District Council Ratana Community Board Taihape Community Board Ruapehu District Council National Park Waimarino-Waiouru South Taranaki District Council Egmont Plains Eltham Hawera-Normanby Patea Tararua District Council Dannevirke Eketahuna Wanganui District Council Wanganui Rural (go to ‘about council/community board’) 4 Hutt City Council Eastbourne Community Board Petone Community Board
    [Show full text]
  • Three Waters
    FOR DECISION MŌ TE WHAKATAUNGA TO Mayor and Councillors AUTHOR Adrian de Laborde Group Manager Engineering Services FILE REFERENCE Document: 2807302 Appendix A: Three Waters Reform Programme M2807311 Appendix B: 3 Waters Stimulus Funding Agreement M2807309 Appendix C: Simpson Grierson Advice SOLGM on MOU M2807308 Appendix D: Notional Funding Allocations M2807307 Appendix E: Eater Stimulus Delivery Plan M2807305 Appendix F: Grant Funding Guidance M2807248 PORTFOLIO HOLDER/S Councillor Ross Harris 3 Waters portfolio MEETING DATE 12 August 2020 SUBJECT Department of Internal Affairs 3-Waters Review Memorandum of Understanding SUMMARY | TE WHAKARĀPOPOTANGA This report provides an update on the Governments reform programme for 3 Waters and seeks approval for the Council to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Crown. The decision is not considered to be a significant decision. Whaarangi 1 | 8 M 2807302 RECOMMENDATION | TE WHAIKUPU THAT the report be received. THAT the Council agrees to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Crown, thus agreeing to participate in the initial stage of a central/local government three waters service delivery reform programme THAT the Council authorise the Chief Executive to enter into the Funding Agreement, to accept a grant from the Crown to spend on operating and/or capital expenditure relating to three waters infrastructure and service delivery THAT the Council considers these decisions to be insignificant under its Significance and Engagement Policy 2017. THAT the Council informs the community that the Memorandum of Understanding has been entered into. 1 PURPOSE | TE ARONGA This report provides an update to the Council on the Government’s progress on the reform of 3-Waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Voter Turnout Statistics for Local Authorities Using Fpp for the 2013 Elections
    VOTER TURNOUT STATISTICS FOR LOCAL AUTHORITIES USING FPP FOR THE 2013 ELECTIONS Total Overall Electoral voters turnout Area Authority ward Type system (N) (%) ASHBURTON DISTRICT ASHBURTON DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 6,810 53.3% AUCKLAND AUCKLAND COUNCIL All CC FPP 292,790 34.9% BAY OF PLENTY REGION BAY OF PLENTY REGIONAL COUNCIL All RC FPP 78,938 41.0% BULLER DISTRICT BULLER DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 3,694 62.4% CARTERTON DISTRICT CARTERTON DISTRICT COUNCIL AT LARGE DC FPP 2,880 45.7% CENTRAL HAWKE'S BAY DISTRICT CENTRAL HAWKE'S BAY DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 5,151 55.2% CENTRAL OTAGO DISTRICT CENTRAL OTAGO DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 6,722 52.9% CHATHAM ISLANDS DISTRICT CHATHAM ISLANDS TERRITORY COUNCIL AT LARGE DC FPP CHRISTCHURCH CITY CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL All CC FPP 103,467 42.9% CLUTHA DISTRICT CLUTHA DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 2,707 59.8% FAR NORTH DISTRICT FAR NORTH DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 18,308 48.9% GISBORNE DISTRICT GISBORNE DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 14,272 48.3% GORE DISTRICT GORE DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 3720 41.7% GREY DISTRICT GREY DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 3,193 45.3% HAMILTON CITY HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL All CC FPP 37,276 38.3% HASTINGS DISTRICT HASTINGS DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 19,927 47.8% HAURAKI DISTRICT HAURAKI DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 5,375 40.4% HAWKE'S BAY REGION HAWKE'S BAY REGIONAL COUNCIL All RC FPP 51,524 47.7% HOROWHENUA DISTRICT HOROWHENUA DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 11,700 52.9% HURUNUI DISTRICT HURUNUI DISTRICT COUNCIL All DC FPP 1,327 44.7% HUTT CITY HUTT CITY COUNCIL All CC FPP
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Trust Grants 2Nd Quarter 2021
    Southern Trust Grants 2nd Quarter 2021 The Southern Trust acknowledges the hard work of all its venue operators in the raising of these funds. 24-7 YouthWork Trust 20000 Alexandra District Museum Incorporated 10137 AllStars MarchingTeams 1500 Andersons Bay Basketball Club 2000 Andersons Bay Community Kindergarten Inc 1900 Anxiety New Zealand Trust 18000 ÅŒTAUTAHI ROLLERS INCORPORATED 800 Aoraki Rugby League incorporated 8000 Aotea Sports Club Incorporated 40000 Apanui School 40000 Arohanui Hospice Service Trust 25038 Art For Life Trust 10000 Artistic Swimming NZ (Inc) 1500 Arts Integrated Trust 5000 Athletics New Zealand (Incorporated) 38750 Athletics Taranaki Incorporated 3025 Awakeri School 28186 Badminton Canterbury Incorporated 5000 Basketball Otago Incorporated 20000 Bay of Plenty Badminton Association Incorporated 20000 Bay of Plenty Hockey Association Incorporated 10000 Bay of Plenty Symphonia Incorporated 3374 Beaconsfield School 5000 Belfast Community Network Incorporated 6000 Big Brothers Big Sisters of Christchurch 8000 Big Brothers Big Sisters of Eastern Bay of Plenty 22230 Big Brothers Big Sisters of Rotorua 10000 Big Brothers Big Sisters of Taranaki 18480 Bike Taupo Advocacy Group Incorporated 4959 Birthright Canterbury Trust 10000 BMX New Zealand Incorporated 19764 Bowls Canterbury Incorporated 1915 Bowls Dunedin Incorporated 3000 Brass Band Association of New Zealand Incorporated 2200 Cancer Society Of New Zealand Taranaki Centre Incorporated 16900 Cansail Charitable Trust 7000 Cantabrian Rugby Football Club Incorporated 2440 Canterbury Boxing Association Incorporated 5000 Canterbury Brain Collective Limited 29500 Canterbury Repertory Theatre Society Incorporated 1350 Canterbury Youth Workers Collective Incorporated 3000 Carers New Zealand 10000 Carisbrook School 3000 Caversham bowling Club Incorporated 4000 CCS DISABILITY ACTION SOUTHLAND INCORPORATED 13400 Page 1 of 7 Southern Trust Grants 2nd Quarter 2021 The Southern Trust acknowledges the hard work of all its venue operators in the raising of these funds.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Coastal Areas of Local Or Regional Significance in the Taranaki Region
    Inventory of coastal areas of local or regional significance in the Taranaki region Summary and discussion Taranaki Regional Council Private Bag 713 Stratford January 2004 Executive summary • The purpose of this report is to summarise key facts on the ‘state’ and pressures affecting public use of and access to areas identified in the Inventory of Coastal Areas of Local or Regional Significance in the Taranaki Region (‘the Inventory’). National issues and initiatives of relevance to coastal use and access are also discussed. • The Inventory identifies coastal areas in Taranaki that have local or regionally significant values. The Inventory describes these values, presents information on land tenure and provides a rating of the status of public access to these sites as excellent, good or poor. • The Taranaki region has a long 263-kilometre coastline comprising of stunning vistas with beautiful sea and landscapes, beaches and sites of natural, historical or recreational interest. • Sixty-nine sites have been identified in an Inventory of Coastal Areas of Local or Regional Significance as having local or regionally significant values including scenic, amenity, recreational, ecological, cultural and historical values. Collectively these areas represent 33% of the Taranaki coastline. • Over 95% of the coastal areas of local or regional significance identified in the Inventory are wholly or partly publicly owned. • Forty (or 58%) of the coastal areas of local or regional significance identified in the Inventory have good or excellent public access while 29 (or 42%) of the sites were rated as having poor public access. • Four factors are identified as limiting coastal public access. These being physical constraints, the need to safeguard associated values, lack of legal access and poorly defined legal access.
    [Show full text]